心理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (7): 772-778.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00772 cstr: 32110.14.2022.00772
收稿日期:
2021-09-07
发布日期:
2022-05-16
出版日期:
2022-07-25
基金资助:
ZHU Lei(), SAI Xueying, Mulati Jiadela
Received:
2021-09-07
Online:
2022-05-16
Published:
2022-07-25
摘要:
许多证据表明权力在大脑中是以垂直空间来进行表征的, 具体而言为言语和视觉空间编码。前人研究发现两种编码具有情境依赖性, 即当前任务决定了激活哪种编码。一般的词类判断任务主要依赖于言语编码。然而仍不确定的是, 当排除言语空间编码后, 词类判断任务能否激活视觉空间编码。本研究拟借助双任务范式探讨此问题。实验结果发现单任务条件下出现权力-空间交互, 并且双任务条件下, 这一交互只受到视觉空间次要任务的干扰。这说明, 词类判断任务也可依赖视觉空间编码, 并进一步支持了权力空间表征的情境依赖性。
中图分类号:
朱磊, 赛雪莹, 贾德拉·木拉提. (2022). 次要任务对词类判断任务中权力空间表征激活的影响. 心理学报, 54(7), 772-778.
ZHU Lei, SAI Xueying, Mulati Jiadela. (2022). The effect of secondary task on power-space interactions during the performance of a semantic category judgment task. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(7), 772-778.
权力词 | 权力大 | 权力小 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
按键上M (SD) | 按键下M (SD) | 按键上M (SD) | 按键下M (SD) | |
单任务 | 814 (82) | 959 (132) | 970 (119) | 882 (88) |
视觉-双任务 | 1084 (197) | 1065 (222) | 1088 (219) | 1073 (195) |
言语-双任务 | 1053 (199) | 1186 (228) | 1238 (267) | 1106 (227) |
表1 各条件下权力词的平均反应时(单位:ms)
权力词 | 权力大 | 权力小 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
按键上M (SD) | 按键下M (SD) | 按键上M (SD) | 按键下M (SD) | |
单任务 | 814 (82) | 959 (132) | 970 (119) | 882 (88) |
视觉-双任务 | 1084 (197) | 1065 (222) | 1088 (219) | 1073 (195) |
言语-双任务 | 1053 (199) | 1186 (228) | 1238 (267) | 1106 (227) |
变量 | F | p | ηp2 |
---|---|---|---|
任务 | 25.25 | < 0.001*** | 0.52 |
权力 | 15.47 | 0.001** | 0.40 |
按键 | 0.22 | 0.645 | 0.01 |
任务×权力 | 2.36 | 0.106 | 0.09 |
任务×按键 | 3.79 | 0.030* | 0.14 |
权力×按键 | 41.82 | <0.001*** | 0.65 |
任务×权力×按键 | 30.74 | <0.001*** | 0.57 |
表2 方差分析结果
变量 | F | p | ηp2 |
---|---|---|---|
任务 | 25.25 | < 0.001*** | 0.52 |
权力 | 15.47 | 0.001** | 0.40 |
按键 | 0.22 | 0.645 | 0.01 |
任务×权力 | 2.36 | 0.106 | 0.09 |
任务×按键 | 3.79 | 0.030* | 0.14 |
权力×按键 | 41.82 | <0.001*** | 0.65 |
任务×权力×按键 | 30.74 | <0.001*** | 0.57 |
[1] |
Anderson, M. L. (2010). Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 245-266.
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000853 pmid: 20964882 |
[2] |
Baddeley, A. D. (1996). The fractionation of working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 93, 13468-13472.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13468 URL |
[3] |
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577-660.
pmid: 11301525 |
[4] |
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Cognitive and neural contributions to understanding the conceptual system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 91-95.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00555.x URL |
[5] |
Barsalou, L. W. (2016). On Staying Grounded and Avoiding Quixotic Dead Ends. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1122-1142.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1028-3 URL |
[6] |
Chiao, J. Y. (2010). Neural basis of social status hierarchy across species. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20(6), 803-809.
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.08.006 pmid: 20850964 |
[7] |
Chiao, J. Y., Harada, T., Oby, E. R., Li, Z., Parrish, T., & Bridge, D. J. (2009). Neural representations of social status hierarchy in human inferior parietal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 354-363.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.023 pmid: 18992759 |
[8] |
Dai, Q., & Zhu, L. (2018). Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of power-space interactions. Consciousness and Cognition, 63(April),151-160.
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.05.003 URL |
[9] |
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371 URL |
[10] |
Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two- digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 626-641.
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.626 URL |
[11] |
Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487-506.
doi: 10.1080/02643290244000239 URL |
[12] |
Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From Power to Action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453-466.
pmid: 14498782 |
[13] |
Gevers, W., Santens, S., Dhooge, E., Chen, Q., van den Bossche, L., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2010). Verbal-Spatial and Visuospatial Coding of Number-Space Interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 180-190.
doi: 10.1037/a0017688 URL |
[14] | Gibbs, R. W. (Ed). (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press. |
[15] |
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1-55.
pmid: 10096994 |
[16] |
Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 435-448.
pmid: 15928716 |
[17] |
Jiang, T., Sun, L., & Zhu, L. (2015). The influence of vertical motor responses on explicit and incidental processing of power words. Consciousness and Cognition, 34, 33-42.
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.02.018 URL |
[18] |
Jiang, T., & Zhu, L. (2015). Is power-space a continuum? Distance effect during power judgments. Consciousness and Cognition, 37, 8-15.
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.08.002 URL |
[19] |
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, Approach, and Inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265-284.
pmid: 12747524 |
[20] | Lakoff, G. (Ed). (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
[21] |
Leshinskaya, A., & Caramazza, A. (2016). For a cognitive neuroscience of concepts: Moving beyond the grounding issue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 991-1001.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0870-z URL |
[22] |
Longe, O., Randall, B., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2007). Grammatical categories in the brain: The role of morphological structure. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1812-1820.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl099 pmid: 17060365 |
[23] |
Lu, L., Schubert, T. W., & Zhu, L. (2017). The spatial representation of power in children. Cognitive processing, 18(4), 375-385.
doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0814-9 URL |
[24] |
Machery, E. (2016). The amodal brain and the offloading hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1090-1095.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0878-4 URL |
[25] | Mahon, B. Z. (2015). What is embodied about cognition?. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 420-429. |
[26] |
Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102, 59-70.
doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.004 URL |
[27] |
Martin, A. (2016). GRAPES—Grounding representations in action, perception, and emotion systems: How object properties and categories are represented in the human brain. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 979-990.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0842-3 URL |
[28] |
Mason, M., Magee, J. C., & Fiske, S. T. (2014). Neural substrates of social status inference: Roles of medial prefrontal cortex and superior temporal sulcus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 1131-1140.
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00553 URL |
[29] |
Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15, 243-247.
doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00659.x URL |
[30] | Paivio, A. (Ed). (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press. |
[31] |
Perani, D., Cappa, S. F., Schnur, T., Tettamanti, M., Collina, S., Rosa, M. M., & Fazio, F. (1999). The neural correlates of verb and noun processing—A PET study. Brain, 122, 2337-2344.
doi: 10.1093/brain/122.12.2337 URL |
[32] |
Schubert, T. W. (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1-21.
pmid: 16060739 |
[33] | Tomasino, B., & Rumiati, R. I. (2013). At the mercy of strategies: The role of motor representations in language understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(27), 1-13. |
[34] |
Wang, X., Han, Z., He, Y., Caramazza, A., Song, L., & Bi, Y. (2013). Where color rests: Spontaneous brain activity of bilateral fusiform and lingual regions predicts object color knowledge performance. NeuroImage, 76, 252-263.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.010 URL |
[35] | Wu, X., Yu, H., Li, X., & Zhu, L. (submitted). Visuospatial or verbal-spatial codes? The different effect of two secondary tasks on the power-space associations during a semantic categorizing task. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. |
[36] |
Zhang, P., Schubert, T. W., & Zhu, L. (2019). The effect of secondary task on the association between power and space. Social Cognition, 37(1), 1-17.
doi: 10.1521/soco.2019.37.1.1 URL |
[1] | 华山, 姜欣桐, 高扬震宇, 穆妍, 杜忆. 音乐训练与音乐素养对共情能力的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(4): 544-558. |
[2] | 张环, 秦锡权, 刘雨, 林琳, 吴捷. 不同强度趋近动机积极情绪对基于语义关联性错误记忆的影响及其神经机制[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(3): 349-362. |
[3] | 张俐娟, 江妍雪, 马建平, 崔博洋, 张锦坤. 提取难度对困难材料提取练习效应的促进作用:来自行为和fNIRS的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(3): 363-379. |
[4] | 谢晓玲, 潘文谊, 张纯纯, 林静远, 李红. 连续反馈影响主导感的心理与脑电机制[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(3): 380-397. |
[5] | 李春好, 刘荣媛, 刘远豪. 经典和对偶共结果效应对前景集结果区间的依赖性:基于概率权重的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(3): 398-414. |
[6] | 连浩敏, 张倩, 谷雪敏, 李寿欣. 持续性视觉注意对视觉工作记忆项目优先加工的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(2): 191-206. |
[7] | 史滋福, 夏笔奇, 刘欣, 陈火红, 靳紫阳, 彭玲艺. 时间预测中的任务分解效应:未来边界和思维焦点的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(2): 207-217. |
[8] | 郝磊, 许天委, 周文龙, 杨杰, 彭思雅, 刘明兰, 徐家华, 王延培, 谭淑平, 高家红, 贺永, 陶沙, 董奇, 秦绍正. 多种情感与认知任务驱动下大脑可泛化神经表征的发育模式[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(2): 218-231. |
[9] | 孙岩, 王艺锦, 侯沛雨, 冯雪, 兰帆. 抑郁倾向对自我关注重评和情境关注重评影响的脑网络研究[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(2): 232-246. |
[10] | 夏莲香, 刘凯歌, 李新宇, 叶群. 编码方式与叙事连贯性调节情绪对时间顺序记忆的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(1): 1-17. |
[11] | 俞梦霞, 宋宜颖, 刘嘉. 实地导航训练提高大脑功能连接模式稳定性[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(12): 1661-1675. |
[12] | 赵文博, 曹宇琪, 徐木子, 杨春亮, 罗良. 学习判断对虚假记忆的反应性效应[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(12): 1691-1705. |
[13] | 王铖铖, 赵宇飞, 盛缨莹, 赵庆柏, 肖梦施, 韩磊. 数字SNARC效应的发生阶段[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(12): 1706-1717. |
[14] | 李想, 贾丽娜, 魏士琳, 陈俊涛, 夏尧远, 王芹, 金花. 运动特征对抽象动词具身表征的影响:来自fMRI及EMG的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(12): 1718-1733. |
[15] | 梁菲菲, 刘瑛, 贺斐, 冯琳琳, 王峥, 白学军. 中文阅读伴随词汇学习中的视觉复杂性效应:基于笔画数和词长的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(12): 1734-1750. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||