内隐序列学习表征机制探究：眼动证据

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00779

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

内隐序列学习的表征机制是内隐学习研究领域的基本问题, 还存在争议。采用眼动追踪技术, 通过3个实验探讨内隐序列学习的表征机制。结果发现, 知觉序列混合眼跳和反应序列混合眼跳条件下发生序列学习; 朝向眼跳和反向眼跳条件下发生序列学习; 有、无分心反向眼跳下发生序列学习, 两者序列学习量差异不显著。整个研究表明, 内隐序列学习的表征依赖于序列信息。

关键词: 序列学习, 表征, 反向眼跳, 混合眼跳, 眼动

Abstract:

The representational mechanism of implicit sequence learning is one of the basic problems in the field of implicit learning, and it remains unclear. Three key theories have been proposed to demonstrate the representational mechanism of implicit sequence learning: stimulus-stimulus association learning (S-S), response-response association learning (R-R), and stimulus-response association learning (S-R). Most studies of implicit sequence learning employed reaction time as a dependent variable to investigate the representational mechanism. However, using reaction time directly in the model may not be ideal as the measured reaction time has several limitations that may confuse the results. For example, the baseline of reaction time may vary across different age groups. In order to overcome the shortcomings of reaction time, the present research applied an eye movement tracking technique and used the saccadic response time as the dependent variable.

In the current study, prosaccade and antisaccade trials in single or mixed tasks were investigated with eye movements, which were recorded using an EyeLink 1000 plus eye-tracker (SR Research inc., Canada). In a prosaccade trial, the subject was asked to look towards a newly appearing target, while in an antisaccade trial, a saccade of the subject to the location opposite to the appeared target was required. Three sets of experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1, forty (40) college students completed the mixed tasks which included both the prosaccade tasks (red target) and the antisaccade tasks (green target). The participants were randomly assigned to a stimulus sequence group (i.e. stimulus followed the sequence) or a response sequence group (i.e. response followed the sequence). In Experiment 2, thirty-eight (38) college students completed either the prosaccade tasks or antisaccade tasks by the instruction of experiment 2. In Experiment 3, two distractors which had one of the same features as the target (color/shape) were added in the trial.Thirty-eight (38) college students completed the distractor task or the no distractor task.

The results showed that: (1) In the mixed saccadic tasks, there was implicit sequence learning in the stimulus sequence condition and in the response sequence condition; (2) in the single saccadic tasks, there was implicit sequence learning in the prosaccade condition and in the antisaccade condition. However, significant difference in the sequence learning scores between the mixed saccadic tasks and the single saccadic tasks was observed; (3) in the distractor tasks, there was implicit sequence learning in the distractor task condition and in the no distractor task condition.

The results of the current three experiments indicate that the representational mechanism of implicit sequence learning includes learning of multiple sequences: stimulus-stimulus associations learning (S-S); response-response associations learning (R-R); and stimulus-response associations learning (S-R).

Key words: sequence learning, representation, antisaccade, mixed saccade, eye movements

中图分类号:

B842

卢张龙, 刘梦娜, 刘玉洁, 马盼盼, 张瑞平. (2022). 内隐序列学习表征机制探究：眼动证据. 心理学报, 54(7), 779-788.

LU Zhanglong, LIU Mengna, LIU Yujie, MA Panpan, ZHANG Ruiping. (2022). Exploring the representational mechanism of implicit sequence learning: Evidence from eye movements. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(7), 779-788.

图/表 5

图1 序列反应时任务流程图

图2 知觉序列和反应序列混合眼跳条件下的眼跳反应时

图3 朝向眼跳和反向眼跳条件下的眼跳反应时

图4 有分心反向眼跳和无分心反向眼跳条件下的眼跳反应时

图5 序列学习三元表征模型

参考文献 42

[1]	Cleeremans, A., Allakhverdov, V., & Kuvaldina, M. (2019). Implicit learning: 50 years on. Hove: Routledge.
[2]	Cleeremans, A., & Jiménez, L. (2002). Implicit learning and consciousness: A graded, dynamic perspective. In R. M. French & A. Cleeremans (Eds.), Implicit learning and Consciousness: An empirical, philosophical and computational consensus in the making (pp. 1-40). Psychology Press: Sussex BN3 2FA.
[3]	Coomans, D., Deroost, N., Vandenbossche, J., van den Bussche, E., & Soetens, E. (2012). Visuospatial perceptual sequence learning and eye movements. Experimental Psychology, 59 (5), 279-285. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000155 pmid: 22617313
[4]	Dai, H., Zhu, C. L., & Liu, D. Z. (2018). Is implicit knowledge abstract? Evidence from implicit sequence learning transfer. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50(9), 965-974. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00965 URL
	[戴惠, 朱传林, 刘电芝. (2018). 内隐知识具有抽象性吗?来自内隐序列学习迁移的证据. 心理学报, 50(9), 965-974.]
[5]	Deroost, N., & Coomans, D. (2018). Is sequence awareness mandatory for perceptual sequence learning: An assessment using a pure perceptual sequence learning design. Acta Psychologica, 183, 58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.01.002 URL
[6]	Deroost, N., Vandenbossche, J., Zeischka, P., Coomans, D., & Soetens, E. (2012). Cognitive control: A role for implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1243-1258.
[7]	Fu, Q, F., Sun, H, M., Dienes, Z., & Fu, X. L. (2018). Implicit sequence learning of chunking and abstract structures. Consciousness and Cognition, 62, 42-56. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.04.010 URL
[8]	Goschke, T. (1998). Implicit learning of perceptual and motor sequences:Evidence for independent learning systems. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 401-444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
[9]	Goschke, T., & Bolte, A. (2012). On the modularity of implicit sequence learning: Independent acquisition of spatial, symbolic, and manual sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 284-320. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.04.002 pmid: 22621762
[10]	Guan, S. Y., & Guo, X. Y. (2016). Knowledge acquistion and the conscious state of knowledge in implicit learning. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 14(2), 191-201.
	[关守义, 郭秀艳. (2016). 内隐学习中的知识习得及其无意识性测量. 心理与行为研究, 14(2), 191-201.]
[11]	Guo, X. Y. (2003). Implicit learning. Shanghai, China: East China Normal University Press.
	[郭秀艳. (2003). 内隐学习. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.]
[12]	Guo, X. Y., Jiang, S., & Gong, R. (2008). Event-related potential studies in sequence learning. Journal of Psychological Science, 31(2), 404-407.
	[郭秀艳, 姜珊, 龚嵘. (2008). 序列学习的ERP研究综述. 心理科学, 31(2), 404-407.]
[13]	Haider, H., Eberhardt, K., Esser, S. & Rose, M. (2014). Implicit visual learning: How the task set modulates learning by determining the stimulus-response binding. Consciousness and Cognition, 26, 145-161. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.03.005 pmid: 24747993
[14]	Haider, H., Eberhardt, K., Kunde, A. & Rose, M. (2013). Implicit visual learning and the expression of learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(1), 82-98. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.11.003 pmid: 23262254
[15]	Hoffmann, J., Martin, C., & Schilling, A. (2003). Unique transitions between stimulus and responses in SRT tasks: Evidence for the primacy of response predictions. Psychological Research, 67(3), 160-173. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0117-2 URL
[16]	Howard, J. H., Jr., Howard, D. V, Dennis, N, A. & Kelly, A. J. (2008). Implicit learning of predictive relationships in three-element visual sequences by young and old adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1139-1157. doi: 10.1037/a0012797 URL
[17]	Jablonowski, J., Taesler, P., Fu, Q., & Rose, M. (2018). Implicit acoustic sequence learning recruits the hippocampus. Plos One, 13, e0209590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209590 URL
[18]	Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90025-F URL
[19]	Jiang, S., Guo, X. Y., Yang, J., & Ma, W. D. (2014). Implicit learning and transfer effect of tonal nonadjacent rule. Psychological Exploration, 34(5), 416-422.
	[姜珊, 郭秀艳, 杨靖, 马闻笛. (2014). 汉语声调远距离规则的内隐学习及其迁移效应, 心理学探新, 34(5), 416-422.]
[20]	Kavakci, M., & Dollaghan, C. (2019). A new method for studying statistical learning in young children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(7), 2483-2490. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0165
[21]	Kinder, A., Rolfs, M., & Kliegl, R. (2008). Sequence learning at optimal stimulus-response mapping: Evidence from a serial reaction time task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(2), 203-209. doi: 10.1080/17470210701557555 URL
[22]	Koch, F. S., Sundqvist, A., Thornberg, U. B., Nyberg, S., Lum, J. A. G., Ullman, M. T., … Heimann, M. (2020). Procedural memory in infancy: Evidence from implicit sequence learning in an eye-tracking paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 191, 104733. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104733 URL
[23]	Lu, Z. L. (2021). The application of eye-movement technique in the study of sequence learning. Psychological Research, 14(6), 512-517.
	[卢张龙. (2021). 眼动记录法在序列学习研究中的应用. 心理研究, 14(6), 512-517.]
[24]	Lu, Z. L., Huang, L. J. Q., & Li, X. Y. (2018). An experimental study on relationship between subliminal emotion and implicit sequence learning: Evidence from eye movements. International Journal of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 1-6. doi: 10.11648/j.ijpbs.20180301.11 URL
[25]	Lu, Z. L., & Li, X. Y. (2018). An eye movement study on the relationship between multiple implicit sequence learning and attention. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 7(1), 8-13. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20180701.13 URL
[26]	Lu, Z. L., Lv, Y., & Bai, X. J. (2011). Attention load has no effect on implicit sequence learning: An eye movement study. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 9(3), 214-218.
	[卢张龙, 吕勇, 白学军. (2011). 内隐序列学习不受注意负荷的影响:来自眼动的证据, 心理与行为研究, 9(3), 214-218.]
[27]	Lv, Y., Hu, W., Wu, G. L., & Shen, D. L. (2008). An experimental study on implicit and explicit learning representations in a serial reaction time task. Journal of Psychological Science, 31(4), 770-773.
	[吕勇, 胡伟, 吴国来, 沈德立. (2008). 序列反应时任务中内隐和外显学习表征方式的实验研究. 心理科学, 31, 770-773.]
[28]	Marcus, D. J., Karatekin, C., & Markiewicz, S. (2006). Oculomotor evidence of sequence learning on the serial reaction time task. Memory & Cognition, 34, 420-432. doi: 10.3758/BF03193419 URL
[29]	Németh, D., Hallgató, E., Janacsek, K., Sándor, T., & Londe, Z. (2009). Perceptual and motor factors of implicit skill learning. Neuroreport, 20, 1654-1658. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328333ba08 URL
[30]	Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 1-32. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8 URL
[31]	Röttger, E., Haider, H., Zhao, F., & Gaschler, R. (2019). Implicit sequence learning despite multitasking: The role of across-task predictability. Psychological Research, 83, 526-543. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0920-4 pmid: 28951973
[32]	Schumacher, E. H., Cookson, S. L., Smith, D. M., Nguyen, T. V. N., Sultan, Z., Reuben, K. E., & Hazeltine, E. (2018). Dual-task processing with identical stimulus and response sets: Assessing the importance of task representation in dual-task interference. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1031. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01031 pmid: 29988541
[33]	Schumacher, E., H., & Schwarb, H. (2009). Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual task conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 270-290. doi: 10.1037/a0015378 URL
[34]	Schwarb, H., & Schumacher, E. H. (2010). Implicit sequence learning is represented by stimulus-response rules. Memory & Cognition, 38, 677-688. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.6.677 URL
[35]	Taesler, P., Jablonowski, J., Fu, Q. F., & Rose, M. (2019). Modeling implicit learning in a cross-modal audio-visual serial reaction time task. Cognitive Systems Research, 54, 154-164. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.10.002 URL
[36]	Tal, A., Bloch, A., Cohen-Dallal, H., Aviv, O., Ashkenazi, S. S., Bar, M., & Vakil, E. (2021). Oculomotor anticipation reveals a multitude of learning processes underlying the serial reaction time task. Scientific Reports, 11, 6190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85842-x URL
[37]	Tal, A., & Vakil, E. (2020). How sequence learning unfolds: Insights from anticipatory eye movements. Cognition, 201(6), 104291. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104291 URL
[38]	Tanaka, K., & Watanabe, K. (2018). Effects of model types in observational learning on implicit sequential learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(7), 1596-1606. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1342672 URL
[39]	Vakil, E., Bloch, A., & Cohen, H. (2017). Anticipation measures of sequence learning: Manual versus oculomotor versions of the serial reaction time task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(3), 579-589. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1172095 URL
[40]	Yan, G. L., & Bai, X. J. (2018). The foundation and application of eye movement technology. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
	[闫国利, 白学军. (2018). 眼动分析技术的基础与应用. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.]
[41]	Yang, H. B., Guo, C., & Liu, D. Z. (2019). Graded consciousness in implicit sequence learning: Evidences form the development and forgetting characteristics of acquired knowledge. Journal of Psychological Science, 42(2), 287-292.
	[杨海波, 郭成, 刘电芝. (2019). 内隐序列学习中的渐进意识: 来自习得知识的发展与遗忘的证据. 心理科学, 42(2), 287-292.]
[42]	Zhang, J. X., Tang, D., Li, Y. L., & Liu, D. Z. (2016). Anti-opposition logic paradigm: An improvement on the opposition logic in implicit artificial grammar learning. Acta Psychologicia Sinica, 48(9), 1130-1142.
	[张剑心, 汤旦, 李莹丽, 刘电芝. (2016). 反向对抗逻辑范式的创立与证实——人工语法PDP对抗逻辑的改进. 心理学报, 48(9), 1130-1142.]