心理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (7): 772-778.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00772
收稿日期:
2021-09-07
出版日期:
2022-07-25
发布日期:
2022-05-16
通讯作者:
朱磊
E-mail:judy1981_81@hotmail.com
基金资助:
ZHU Lei(), SAI Xueying, Mulati Jiadela
Received:
2021-09-07
Online:
2022-07-25
Published:
2022-05-16
Contact:
ZHU Lei
E-mail:judy1981_81@hotmail.com
摘要:
许多证据表明权力在大脑中是以垂直空间来进行表征的, 具体而言为言语和视觉空间编码。前人研究发现两种编码具有情境依赖性, 即当前任务决定了激活哪种编码。一般的词类判断任务主要依赖于言语编码。然而仍不确定的是, 当排除言语空间编码后, 词类判断任务能否激活视觉空间编码。本研究拟借助双任务范式探讨此问题。实验结果发现单任务条件下出现权力-空间交互, 并且双任务条件下, 这一交互只受到视觉空间次要任务的干扰。这说明, 词类判断任务也可依赖视觉空间编码, 并进一步支持了权力空间表征的情境依赖性。
中图分类号:
朱磊, 赛雪莹, 贾德拉·木拉提. (2022). 次要任务对词类判断任务中权力空间表征激活的影响. 心理学报, 54(7), 772-778.
ZHU Lei, SAI Xueying, Mulati Jiadela. (2022). The effect of secondary task on power-space interactions during the performance of a semantic category judgment task. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(7), 772-778.
权力词 | 权力大 | 权力小 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
按键上M (SD) | 按键下M (SD) | 按键上M (SD) | 按键下M (SD) | |
单任务 | 814 (82) | 959 (132) | 970 (119) | 882 (88) |
视觉-双任务 | 1084 (197) | 1065 (222) | 1088 (219) | 1073 (195) |
言语-双任务 | 1053 (199) | 1186 (228) | 1238 (267) | 1106 (227) |
表1 各条件下权力词的平均反应时(单位:ms)
权力词 | 权力大 | 权力小 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
按键上M (SD) | 按键下M (SD) | 按键上M (SD) | 按键下M (SD) | |
单任务 | 814 (82) | 959 (132) | 970 (119) | 882 (88) |
视觉-双任务 | 1084 (197) | 1065 (222) | 1088 (219) | 1073 (195) |
言语-双任务 | 1053 (199) | 1186 (228) | 1238 (267) | 1106 (227) |
变量 | F | p | ηp2 |
---|---|---|---|
任务 | 25.25 | < 0.001*** | 0.52 |
权力 | 15.47 | 0.001** | 0.40 |
按键 | 0.22 | 0.645 | 0.01 |
任务×权力 | 2.36 | 0.106 | 0.09 |
任务×按键 | 3.79 | 0.030* | 0.14 |
权力×按键 | 41.82 | <0.001*** | 0.65 |
任务×权力×按键 | 30.74 | <0.001*** | 0.57 |
表2 方差分析结果
变量 | F | p | ηp2 |
---|---|---|---|
任务 | 25.25 | < 0.001*** | 0.52 |
权力 | 15.47 | 0.001** | 0.40 |
按键 | 0.22 | 0.645 | 0.01 |
任务×权力 | 2.36 | 0.106 | 0.09 |
任务×按键 | 3.79 | 0.030* | 0.14 |
权力×按键 | 41.82 | <0.001*** | 0.65 |
任务×权力×按键 | 30.74 | <0.001*** | 0.57 |
[1] |
Anderson, M. L. (2010). Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 245-266.
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000853 pmid: 20964882 |
[2] |
Baddeley, A. D. (1996). The fractionation of working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 93, 13468-13472.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13468 URL |
[3] |
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577-660.
pmid: 11301525 |
[4] |
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Cognitive and neural contributions to understanding the conceptual system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 91-95.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00555.x URL |
[5] |
Barsalou, L. W. (2016). On Staying Grounded and Avoiding Quixotic Dead Ends. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1122-1142.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1028-3 URL |
[6] |
Chiao, J. Y. (2010). Neural basis of social status hierarchy across species. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20(6), 803-809.
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.08.006 pmid: 20850964 |
[7] |
Chiao, J. Y., Harada, T., Oby, E. R., Li, Z., Parrish, T., & Bridge, D. J. (2009). Neural representations of social status hierarchy in human inferior parietal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 354-363.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.023 pmid: 18992759 |
[8] |
Dai, Q., & Zhu, L. (2018). Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of power-space interactions. Consciousness and Cognition, 63(April),151-160.
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.05.003 URL |
[9] |
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371 URL |
[10] |
Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two- digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 626-641.
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.626 URL |
[11] |
Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487-506.
doi: 10.1080/02643290244000239 URL |
[12] |
Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From Power to Action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453-466.
pmid: 14498782 |
[13] |
Gevers, W., Santens, S., Dhooge, E., Chen, Q., van den Bossche, L., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2010). Verbal-Spatial and Visuospatial Coding of Number-Space Interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 180-190.
doi: 10.1037/a0017688 URL |
[14] | Gibbs, R. W. (Ed). (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press. |
[15] |
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1-55.
pmid: 10096994 |
[16] |
Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 435-448.
pmid: 15928716 |
[17] |
Jiang, T., Sun, L., & Zhu, L. (2015). The influence of vertical motor responses on explicit and incidental processing of power words. Consciousness and Cognition, 34, 33-42.
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.02.018 URL |
[18] |
Jiang, T., & Zhu, L. (2015). Is power-space a continuum? Distance effect during power judgments. Consciousness and Cognition, 37, 8-15.
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.08.002 URL |
[19] |
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, Approach, and Inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265-284.
pmid: 12747524 |
[20] | Lakoff, G. (Ed). (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
[21] |
Leshinskaya, A., & Caramazza, A. (2016). For a cognitive neuroscience of concepts: Moving beyond the grounding issue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 991-1001.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0870-z URL |
[22] |
Longe, O., Randall, B., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2007). Grammatical categories in the brain: The role of morphological structure. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1812-1820.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl099 pmid: 17060365 |
[23] |
Lu, L., Schubert, T. W., & Zhu, L. (2017). The spatial representation of power in children. Cognitive processing, 18(4), 375-385.
doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0814-9 URL |
[24] |
Machery, E. (2016). The amodal brain and the offloading hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1090-1095.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0878-4 URL |
[25] | Mahon, B. Z. (2015). What is embodied about cognition?. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 420-429. |
[26] |
Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102, 59-70.
doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.004 URL |
[27] |
Martin, A. (2016). GRAPES—Grounding representations in action, perception, and emotion systems: How object properties and categories are represented in the human brain. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 979-990.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0842-3 URL |
[28] |
Mason, M., Magee, J. C., & Fiske, S. T. (2014). Neural substrates of social status inference: Roles of medial prefrontal cortex and superior temporal sulcus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 1131-1140.
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00553 URL |
[29] |
Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15, 243-247.
doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00659.x URL |
[30] | Paivio, A. (Ed). (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press. |
[31] |
Perani, D., Cappa, S. F., Schnur, T., Tettamanti, M., Collina, S., Rosa, M. M., & Fazio, F. (1999). The neural correlates of verb and noun processing—A PET study. Brain, 122, 2337-2344.
doi: 10.1093/brain/122.12.2337 URL |
[32] |
Schubert, T. W. (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1-21.
pmid: 16060739 |
[33] | Tomasino, B., & Rumiati, R. I. (2013). At the mercy of strategies: The role of motor representations in language understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(27), 1-13. |
[34] |
Wang, X., Han, Z., He, Y., Caramazza, A., Song, L., & Bi, Y. (2013). Where color rests: Spontaneous brain activity of bilateral fusiform and lingual regions predicts object color knowledge performance. NeuroImage, 76, 252-263.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.010 URL |
[35] | Wu, X., Yu, H., Li, X., & Zhu, L. (submitted). Visuospatial or verbal-spatial codes? The different effect of two secondary tasks on the power-space associations during a semantic categorizing task. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. |
[36] |
Zhang, P., Schubert, T. W., & Zhu, L. (2019). The effect of secondary task on the association between power and space. Social Cognition, 37(1), 1-17.
doi: 10.1521/soco.2019.37.1.1 URL |
[1] | 赵春宇, 郭春彦. 合体字与复合词中联结编码和项目编码的关系[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(4): 513-528. |
[2] | 姜路遥, 李兵兵. 汉语听觉阈下启动效应:来自听觉掩蔽启动范式的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(4): 529-541. |
[3] | 姜英杰, 马潇潇, 姜元涛, 任吉梅, 龙翼婷. 编码后奖赏影响基于议程的学习:奖赏预期和结果的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(4): 542-555. |
[4] | 孙楚, 耿海燕. 自我与他人视角的动态信息加工:一项行为振荡研究[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(2): 224-236. |
[5] | 王小琴, 谈雅菲, 蒙杰, 刘源, 位东涛, 杨文静, 邱江. 情绪调节灵活性对负性情绪的影响:来自经验取样的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(2): 192-209. |
[6] | 郑茜, 张亭亭, 李量, 范宁, 杨志刚. 言语的情绪韵律和情绪语义对听觉去信息掩蔽的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(2): 177-191. |
[7] | 曹海波, 兰泽波, 高峰, 于海涛, 李鹏, 王敬欣. 词素位置概率在中文阅读中的作用:词汇判断和眼动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(2): 159-176. |
[8] | 吴梅红. 老龄化对F0轮廓线索在汉语言语识别去掩蔽作用的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 94-105. |
[9] | 张慢慢, 胡惠兰, 张志超, 李鑫, 汪强, 白学军, 臧传丽. 预测性对快速读者和慢速读者词汇加工的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 79-93. |
[10] | 陈旭燕, 李鹏, 闫志英. 焦虑对重量感知判断的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 66-78. |
[11] | 黄昕杰, 张弛, 万华根, 张灵聪. 情绪效价可预测性对时间捆绑效应的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 36-44. |
[12] | 陈悦源, 方卫宁, 郭北苑, 鲍海峰. 作业中断对任务绩效的影响及心理疲劳的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 22-35. |
[13] | 李妍, 程竞暄, 喻婧. 老年人情景记忆更新的改变:竞争记忆的回溯性干扰[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 106-116. |
[14] | 胡晓斐, 汪嘉维, 刘涵宇, 宋晓蕾. 听觉刺激对虚拟环境中空间压缩的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 1-8. |
[15] | 陈幼贞, 张曼曼, 林秋蓉. 认知负荷与编码方式影响小学数学学业不良生的前瞻记忆及其成分[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(12): 1491-1502. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||