心理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (7): 828-849.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00828
收稿日期:
2021-04-06
发布日期:
2022-05-16
出版日期:
2022-07-25
通讯作者:
陈建文
E-mail:chenjianwen@hust.edu.cn
基金资助:
LIAO Youguo1,2, CHEN Jianwen2(), ZHANG Yan2, PENG Cong2
Received:
2021-04-06
Online:
2022-05-16
Published:
2022-07-25
Contact:
CHEN Jianwen
E-mail:chenjianwen@hust.edu.cn
摘要:
本研究采用元分析技术探讨儿童青少年同伴侵害与内化问题的纵向关系, 检验人际风险模型、症状驱动模型与相互作用模型在两者关系中的适用性。共纳入89篇文献, 包含99个独立效应量, 涉及被试70598人。随机效应模型分析结果表明, 同伴侵害可以预测内化问题(β = 0.097, 95% CI [0.083, 0.110]), 内化问题对同伴侵害也存在预测作用(β = 0.119, 95% CI [0.104, 0.135]), 结果支持同伴侵害与内化问题的相互作用模型。同伴侵害对内化问题的预测作用中, 年龄与侵害类型存在调节效应, 测量时间间隔、侵害类型、评定方式与问题类型在内化问题对同伴侵害的预测中起调节作用, 中西文化类型在两者相互预测模型中均不存在调节作用, 各调节因素在同伴侵害及其亚类型外显侵害、关系侵害与内化问题双向关系中的作用基本一致。
中图分类号:
廖友国, 陈建文, 张妍, 彭聪. (2022). 儿童青少年同伴侵害与内化问题的双向关系: 纵向研究的元分析. 心理学报, 54(7), 828-849.
LIAO Youguo, CHEN Jianwen, ZHANG Yan, PENG Cong. (2022). The reciprocal relationship between peer victimization and internalizing problems in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(7), 828-849.
第一作者 | 年份 | 文化背景 | 样本量 | 均龄 | 时间间隔(年) | PV评定 | IP评定 | 侵害类型 | rPV, IP | PV→IPa | IP→PVa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adrian | 2019 | 美国 | 287 | — | 0.33 | 自评 | 自评 | 3, 4, 5 | 0.34 | 0.13 | — |
Arora | 2020 | 美国 | 232 | 12.96 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 2, 3 | 0.53 | 0.28 | — |
Barchia | 2010 | 澳大利亚 | 1167 | 13.30 | 0.67 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 2, 3 | 0.41 | 0.07 | 0.12 |
Boivin | 1995 | 加拿大 | 567 | 10.83 | 1.00 | 同学 | 自评 | 0 | 0.45 | 0.07 | 0.09 |
Brown | 2016 | 美国 | 294 | 8.71 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 2, 3, 4 | 0.37 | — | 0.20 |
Burke | 2017 | 瑞士 | 837 | 13.20 | 0.50 | 自评 | 自评 | 0 | 0.24 | 0.06 | 0.09 |
Chen | 2021 | 中国 | 1987 | 12.32 | 0.50 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 2, 3 | 0.55 | 0.08 | 0.11 |
Cooley | 2020 | 美国 | 464 | 8.64 | 0.50 | 自评 | 自评 | 0 | 0.43 | 0.16 | — |
Cooley | 2017 | 美国 | 228 | 8.32 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 3 | 0.36 | — | 0.16 |
Desjardins | 2011 | 加拿大 | 580 | 15.50 | 2.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 3 | 0.30 | 0.03 | 0.36 |
Dill | 2004 | 美国 | 296 | — | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 2, 3, 5 | 0.39 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
Doyle | 2016 | 美国 | 437 | — | 0.50 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 2, 3 | 0.38 | 0.07 | 0.24 |
Drazdowski | 2019 | 美国 | 317 | 12.10 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 3, 4 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.17 |
Ehrlich | 2017 | 美国 | 692 | 15.62 | 0.25 | 自评 | 自评 | 3, 4, 5 | 0.29 | — | 0.11 |
Erath | 2016 | 美国 | 123 | 12.03 | 0.83 | 自评 | 自评 | 0 | 0.57 | 0.28 | — |
Forbes | 2019 | 澳大利亚 | 4169 | 10.30 | 2.00 | 综合 | 综合 | 1, 3, 5 | 0.53 | 0.13 | 0.09 |
Fox | 2021 | 美国 | 178 | 9.58 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 2, 3 | 0.43 | 0.11 | — |
Gibb | 2012 | 美国 | 100 | 9.97 | 0.17 | 自评 | 自评 | 3, 4 | 0.45 | 0.07 | 0.20 |
Griese | 2014 | 美国 | 511 | 10.62 | 1.00 | 同学 | 自评 | 3, 4 | 0.34 | 0.09 | — |
Hanish | 2002 | 美国 | 1469 | — | 2.00 | 同学 | 教师 | 0 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.04 |
Healy | 2018 | 澳大利亚 | 111 | 8.72 | 0.75 | 自评 | 父母 | 1, 2, 3 | -0.09 | -0.01 | 0.21 |
Helms | 2015 | 美国 | 313 | 17.13 | 1.00 | 同学 | 自评 | 1, 3 | 0.01 | 0.07 | — |
Henrich | 2014 | 以色列 | 1081 | 11.00 | 1.00 | 自评 | 父母 | 1, 2, 3 | 0.16 | 0.05 | — |
Herzig | 2011 | 美国 | 286 | 13.51 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 3, 4 | 0.43 | 0.10 | 0.07 |
Hodges | 1999 | 美国 | 173 | 11.30 | 1.00 | 同学 | 同学 | 0 | 0.69 | 0.12 | 0.17 |
Hodges | 1999 | 加拿大 | 393 | 10.00 | 1.00 | 同学 | 教师 | 0 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.08 |
Irwin | 2019 | 加拿大 | 396 | 11.80 | 0.50 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 2, 3, 5 | 0.46 | 0.06 | 0.18 |
Isaacs | 2008 | 芬兰 | 177 | — | 8.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 0 | 0.10 | 0.23 | — |
Kawabata | 2017 | 日本 | 528 | — | 1年内 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 3 | 0.40 | 0.03 | 0.10 |
Knoble | 2015 | 美国 | 302 | 11.90 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 0 | 0.43 | — | 0.23 |
Knoble | 2015 | 美国 | 291 | 11.90 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 0 | 0.29 | — | 0.06 |
Kochel | 2017 | 美国 | 483 | 11.10 | 1.00 | 同学 | 父母 | 1, 2, 3, 5 | 0.41 | 0.12 | 0.18 |
Kochel | 2012 | 美国 | 380 | 9.93 | 1.00 | 自评 | 父母 | 1, 2, 3, 5 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.13 |
Kochel | 2020 | 美国 | 230 | 9.48 | 0.50 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 2, 3, 5 | 0.50 | 0.03 | 0.14 |
Krygsman | 2019 | 加拿大 | 464 | 12.00 | 1.00 | 同学 | 自评 | 0 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.03 |
Krygsman | 2017 | 加拿大 | 703 | 11.91 | 1.00 | 自评 | 同学 | 1, 2, 3, 5 | 0.21 | 0.08 | 0.11 |
Landoll | 2012 | 美国 | 941 | 15.80 | 0.13 | 自评 | 自评 | 0 | 0.33 | 0.12 | 0.08 |
Leadbeater | 2014 | 加拿大 | 578 | 15.52 | 2.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 3 | 0.29 | 0.01 | 0.11 |
Leeuwis | 2015 | 荷兰 | 330 | 11.20 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 3 | 0.44 | 0.11 | 0.05 |
Lepore | 2019 | 美国 | 986 | 12.81 | 0.50 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 3, 4 | 0.40 | 0.15 | — |
Liu | 2018 | 中国 | 945 | 10.16 | 1.00 | 同学 | 自评 | 3, 4 | 0.20 | 0.11 | 0.04 |
Loukas | 2013 | 美国 | 227 | 11.69 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 3, 4 | 0.52 | 0.22 | — |
Loukas | 2013 | 美国 | 263 | 11.69 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 3, 4 | 0.47 | 0.19 | — |
Machmutow | 2012 | 瑞士 | 765 | 13.18 | 0.50 | 自评 | 自评 | 5 | 0.27 | 0.08 | 0.11 |
McConnell | 2018 | 美国 | 123 | 12.03 | 0.83 | 教师 | 自评 | 0 | 0.22 | 0.12 | — |
McLaughlin | 2009 | 美国 | 1065 | — | 0.58 | 自评 | 自评 | 3, 4, 5 | 0.30 | 0.12 | 0.08 |
Mlawer | 2019 | 美国 | 1264 | 10.10 | 0.58 | 自评 | 教师 | 1, 2, 3 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.04 |
Morabito | 2021 | 美国 | 317 | 12.42 | 2.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 3, 4 | 0.37 | 0.03 | 0.15 |
Mulder | 2017 | 荷兰 | 748 | 12.00 | 0.50 | 同学 | 自评 | 0 | 0.31 | 0.02 | 0.05 |
Mulder | 2017 | 荷兰 | 755 | 12.00 | 0.50 | 同学 | 自评 | 0 | 0.25 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
Noret | 2021 | 英国 | 533 | 12.56 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 3, 5 | 0.41 | 0.33 | 0.12 |
表1 纳入元分析原始研究的基本资料
第一作者 | 年份 | 文化背景 | 样本量 | 均龄 | 时间间隔(年) | PV评定 | IP评定 | 侵害类型 | rPV, IP | PV→IPa | IP→PVa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adrian | 2019 | 美国 | 287 | — | 0.33 | 自评 | 自评 | 3, 4, 5 | 0.34 | 0.13 | — |
Arora | 2020 | 美国 | 232 | 12.96 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 2, 3 | 0.53 | 0.28 | — |
Barchia | 2010 | 澳大利亚 | 1167 | 13.30 | 0.67 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 2, 3 | 0.41 | 0.07 | 0.12 |
Boivin | 1995 | 加拿大 | 567 | 10.83 | 1.00 | 同学 | 自评 | 0 | 0.45 | 0.07 | 0.09 |
Brown | 2016 | 美国 | 294 | 8.71 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 2, 3, 4 | 0.37 | — | 0.20 |
Burke | 2017 | 瑞士 | 837 | 13.20 | 0.50 | 自评 | 自评 | 0 | 0.24 | 0.06 | 0.09 |
Chen | 2021 | 中国 | 1987 | 12.32 | 0.50 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 2, 3 | 0.55 | 0.08 | 0.11 |
Cooley | 2020 | 美国 | 464 | 8.64 | 0.50 | 自评 | 自评 | 0 | 0.43 | 0.16 | — |
Cooley | 2017 | 美国 | 228 | 8.32 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 3 | 0.36 | — | 0.16 |
Desjardins | 2011 | 加拿大 | 580 | 15.50 | 2.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 3 | 0.30 | 0.03 | 0.36 |
Dill | 2004 | 美国 | 296 | — | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 2, 3, 5 | 0.39 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
Doyle | 2016 | 美国 | 437 | — | 0.50 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 2, 3 | 0.38 | 0.07 | 0.24 |
Drazdowski | 2019 | 美国 | 317 | 12.10 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 3, 4 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.17 |
Ehrlich | 2017 | 美国 | 692 | 15.62 | 0.25 | 自评 | 自评 | 3, 4, 5 | 0.29 | — | 0.11 |
Erath | 2016 | 美国 | 123 | 12.03 | 0.83 | 自评 | 自评 | 0 | 0.57 | 0.28 | — |
Forbes | 2019 | 澳大利亚 | 4169 | 10.30 | 2.00 | 综合 | 综合 | 1, 3, 5 | 0.53 | 0.13 | 0.09 |
Fox | 2021 | 美国 | 178 | 9.58 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 2, 3 | 0.43 | 0.11 | — |
Gibb | 2012 | 美国 | 100 | 9.97 | 0.17 | 自评 | 自评 | 3, 4 | 0.45 | 0.07 | 0.20 |
Griese | 2014 | 美国 | 511 | 10.62 | 1.00 | 同学 | 自评 | 3, 4 | 0.34 | 0.09 | — |
Hanish | 2002 | 美国 | 1469 | — | 2.00 | 同学 | 教师 | 0 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.04 |
Healy | 2018 | 澳大利亚 | 111 | 8.72 | 0.75 | 自评 | 父母 | 1, 2, 3 | -0.09 | -0.01 | 0.21 |
Helms | 2015 | 美国 | 313 | 17.13 | 1.00 | 同学 | 自评 | 1, 3 | 0.01 | 0.07 | — |
Henrich | 2014 | 以色列 | 1081 | 11.00 | 1.00 | 自评 | 父母 | 1, 2, 3 | 0.16 | 0.05 | — |
Herzig | 2011 | 美国 | 286 | 13.51 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 3, 4 | 0.43 | 0.10 | 0.07 |
Hodges | 1999 | 美国 | 173 | 11.30 | 1.00 | 同学 | 同学 | 0 | 0.69 | 0.12 | 0.17 |
Hodges | 1999 | 加拿大 | 393 | 10.00 | 1.00 | 同学 | 教师 | 0 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.08 |
Irwin | 2019 | 加拿大 | 396 | 11.80 | 0.50 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 2, 3, 5 | 0.46 | 0.06 | 0.18 |
Isaacs | 2008 | 芬兰 | 177 | — | 8.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 0 | 0.10 | 0.23 | — |
Kawabata | 2017 | 日本 | 528 | — | 1年内 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 3 | 0.40 | 0.03 | 0.10 |
Knoble | 2015 | 美国 | 302 | 11.90 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 0 | 0.43 | — | 0.23 |
Knoble | 2015 | 美国 | 291 | 11.90 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 0 | 0.29 | — | 0.06 |
Kochel | 2017 | 美国 | 483 | 11.10 | 1.00 | 同学 | 父母 | 1, 2, 3, 5 | 0.41 | 0.12 | 0.18 |
Kochel | 2012 | 美国 | 380 | 9.93 | 1.00 | 自评 | 父母 | 1, 2, 3, 5 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.13 |
Kochel | 2020 | 美国 | 230 | 9.48 | 0.50 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 2, 3, 5 | 0.50 | 0.03 | 0.14 |
Krygsman | 2019 | 加拿大 | 464 | 12.00 | 1.00 | 同学 | 自评 | 0 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.03 |
Krygsman | 2017 | 加拿大 | 703 | 11.91 | 1.00 | 自评 | 同学 | 1, 2, 3, 5 | 0.21 | 0.08 | 0.11 |
Landoll | 2012 | 美国 | 941 | 15.80 | 0.13 | 自评 | 自评 | 0 | 0.33 | 0.12 | 0.08 |
Leadbeater | 2014 | 加拿大 | 578 | 15.52 | 2.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 3 | 0.29 | 0.01 | 0.11 |
Leeuwis | 2015 | 荷兰 | 330 | 11.20 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 3 | 0.44 | 0.11 | 0.05 |
Lepore | 2019 | 美国 | 986 | 12.81 | 0.50 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 3, 4 | 0.40 | 0.15 | — |
Liu | 2018 | 中国 | 945 | 10.16 | 1.00 | 同学 | 自评 | 3, 4 | 0.20 | 0.11 | 0.04 |
Loukas | 2013 | 美国 | 227 | 11.69 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 3, 4 | 0.52 | 0.22 | — |
Loukas | 2013 | 美国 | 263 | 11.69 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 3, 4 | 0.47 | 0.19 | — |
Machmutow | 2012 | 瑞士 | 765 | 13.18 | 0.50 | 自评 | 自评 | 5 | 0.27 | 0.08 | 0.11 |
McConnell | 2018 | 美国 | 123 | 12.03 | 0.83 | 教师 | 自评 | 0 | 0.22 | 0.12 | — |
McLaughlin | 2009 | 美国 | 1065 | — | 0.58 | 自评 | 自评 | 3, 4, 5 | 0.30 | 0.12 | 0.08 |
Mlawer | 2019 | 美国 | 1264 | 10.10 | 0.58 | 自评 | 教师 | 1, 2, 3 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.04 |
Morabito | 2021 | 美国 | 317 | 12.42 | 2.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 3, 4 | 0.37 | 0.03 | 0.15 |
Mulder | 2017 | 荷兰 | 748 | 12.00 | 0.50 | 同学 | 自评 | 0 | 0.31 | 0.02 | 0.05 |
Mulder | 2017 | 荷兰 | 755 | 12.00 | 0.50 | 同学 | 自评 | 0 | 0.25 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
Noret | 2021 | 英国 | 533 | 12.56 | 1.00 | 自评 | 自评 | 1, 3, 5 | 0.41 | 0.33 | 0.12 |
指标 | 模型 | 研究数 | 异质性 | Tau-squared | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q值 | df (Q) | p-value | I-squared | Tau Squared | SE | Variance | Tau | |||
PV→IP | 随机模型 | 89 | 221.673 | 88 | <0.001 | 60.302 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.047 |
IP→PV | 随机模型 | 79 | 260.104 | 78 | <0.001 | 70.012 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.055 |
表2 同伴侵害与内化问题相互预测关系效应值的异质性检验结果
指标 | 模型 | 研究数 | 异质性 | Tau-squared | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q值 | df (Q) | p-value | I-squared | Tau Squared | SE | Variance | Tau | |||
PV→IP | 随机模型 | 89 | 221.673 | 88 | <0.001 | 60.302 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.047 |
IP→PV | 随机模型 | 79 | 260.104 | 78 | <0.001 | 70.012 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.055 |
指标 | 研究数 | 效应值及95%置信区间 | 双尾检验 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
点估计 | 下限 | 上限 | Z值 | p | ||
PV→IP | 89 | 0.097 | 0.083 | 0.110 | 14.012 | <0.001 |
IP→PV | 79 | 0.119 | 0.104 | 0.135 | 15.068 | <0.001 |
表3 同伴侵害与内化问题关系的随机模型分析
指标 | 研究数 | 效应值及95%置信区间 | 双尾检验 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
点估计 | 下限 | 上限 | Z值 | p | ||
PV→IP | 89 | 0.097 | 0.083 | 0.110 | 14.012 | <0.001 |
IP→PV | 79 | 0.119 | 0.104 | 0.135 | 15.068 | <0.001 |
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 95% CI | 双尾检验 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB | df | p | 点估计 | 下限 | 上限 | Z值 | p | |||
文化类型 | 1.198 | 1 | 0.274 | 中国 | 16 | 0.086 | 0.065 | 0.108 | 7.893 | <0.001 |
西方 | 72 | 0.101 | 0.085 | 0.118 | 12.097 | <0.001 | ||||
年龄 | 4.246 | 1 | 0.039 | 12岁以下 | 45 | 0.113 | 0.094 | 0.133 | 11.521 | <0.001 |
12岁及以上 | 41 | 0.085 | 0.066 | 0.104 | 8.898 | <0.001 | ||||
测量时间间隔 | 0.938 | 1 | 0.333 | 1年以内 | 37 | 0.088 | 0.071 | 0.105 | 10.151 | <0.001 |
1年及以上 | 51 | 0.101 | 0.081 | 0.120 | 9.978 | <0.001 | ||||
侵害类型 | 7.680 | 1 | 0.006 | 外显侵害 | 28 | 0.059 | 0.043 | 0.074 | 7.432 | <0.001 |
关系侵害 | 28 | 0.090 | 0.074 | 0.106 | 11.147 | <0.001 | ||||
评定方式 | 1.681 | 1 | 0.195 | 相同评定者 | 54 | 0.095 | 0.077 | 0.113 | 10.476 | <0.001 |
不同评定者 | 12 | 0.069 | 0.033 | 0.105 | 3.732 | <0.001 | ||||
问题类型 | 5.647 | 3 | 0.130 | 内化问题 | 17 | 0.110 | 0.080 | 0.141 | 7.021 | <0.001 |
抑郁 | 64 | 0.092 | 0.075 | 0.110 | 10.153 | <0.001 | ||||
焦虑 | 22 | 0.070 | 0.049 | 0.090 | 6.667 | <0.001 | ||||
孤独感 | 6 | 0.102 | 0.057 | 0.146 | 4.470 | <0.001 |
表4 同伴侵害对内化问题预测关系的随机模型分析
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 95% CI | 双尾检验 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB | df | p | 点估计 | 下限 | 上限 | Z值 | p | |||
文化类型 | 1.198 | 1 | 0.274 | 中国 | 16 | 0.086 | 0.065 | 0.108 | 7.893 | <0.001 |
西方 | 72 | 0.101 | 0.085 | 0.118 | 12.097 | <0.001 | ||||
年龄 | 4.246 | 1 | 0.039 | 12岁以下 | 45 | 0.113 | 0.094 | 0.133 | 11.521 | <0.001 |
12岁及以上 | 41 | 0.085 | 0.066 | 0.104 | 8.898 | <0.001 | ||||
测量时间间隔 | 0.938 | 1 | 0.333 | 1年以内 | 37 | 0.088 | 0.071 | 0.105 | 10.151 | <0.001 |
1年及以上 | 51 | 0.101 | 0.081 | 0.120 | 9.978 | <0.001 | ||||
侵害类型 | 7.680 | 1 | 0.006 | 外显侵害 | 28 | 0.059 | 0.043 | 0.074 | 7.432 | <0.001 |
关系侵害 | 28 | 0.090 | 0.074 | 0.106 | 11.147 | <0.001 | ||||
评定方式 | 1.681 | 1 | 0.195 | 相同评定者 | 54 | 0.095 | 0.077 | 0.113 | 10.476 | <0.001 |
不同评定者 | 12 | 0.069 | 0.033 | 0.105 | 3.732 | <0.001 | ||||
问题类型 | 5.647 | 3 | 0.130 | 内化问题 | 17 | 0.110 | 0.080 | 0.141 | 7.021 | <0.001 |
抑郁 | 64 | 0.092 | 0.075 | 0.110 | 10.153 | <0.001 | ||||
焦虑 | 22 | 0.070 | 0.049 | 0.090 | 6.667 | <0.001 | ||||
孤独感 | 6 | 0.102 | 0.057 | 0.146 | 4.470 | <0.001 |
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 95% CI | 双尾检验 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB | df | p | 点估计 | 下限 | 上限 | Z值 | p | |||
文化类型 | 1.616 | 1 | 0.204 | 中国 | 13 | 0.098 | 0.059 | 0.136 | 5.014 | <0.001 |
西方 | 65 | 0.125 | 0.107 | 0.142 | 14.089 | <0.001 | ||||
年龄 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.986 | 12岁以下 | 41 | 0.114 | 0.092 | 0.137 | 9.845 | <0.001 |
12岁及以上 | 34 | 0.115 | 0.093 | 0.136 | 10.629 | <0.001 | ||||
测量时间间隔 | 5.699 | 1 | 0.017 | 1年以内 | 33 | 0.100 | 0.087 | 0.113 | 15.445 | <0.001 |
1年及以上 | 46 | 0.120 | 0.110 | 0.130 | 23.672 | <0.001 | ||||
侵害类型 | 16.176 | 1 | 0.000 | 外显侵害 | 22 | 0.082 | 0.065 | 0.099 | 9.461 | <0.001 |
关系侵害 | 23 | 0.131 | 0.114 | 0.148 | 14.929 | <0.001 | ||||
评定方式 | 5.351 | 1 | 0.021 | 相同评定者 | 50 | 0.141 | 0.122 | 0.159 | 14.966 | <0.001 |
不同评定者 | 10 | 0.076 | 0.024 | 0.128 | 2.868 | <0.001 | ||||
问题类型 | 17.651 | 3 | 0.001 | 内化问题 | 15 | 0.083 | 0.060 | 0.106 | 7.031 | <0.001 |
抑郁 | 54 | 0.126 | 0.106 | 0.145 | 12.733 | <0.001 | ||||
焦虑 | 23 | 0.061 | 0.036 | 4.698 | 4.698 | <0.001 | ||||
孤独感 | 5 | 0.079 | 0.021 | 0.179 | 1.545 | <0.001 |
表5 内化问题对同伴侵害预测关系的随机模型分析
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 95% CI | 双尾检验 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB | df | p | 点估计 | 下限 | 上限 | Z值 | p | |||
文化类型 | 1.616 | 1 | 0.204 | 中国 | 13 | 0.098 | 0.059 | 0.136 | 5.014 | <0.001 |
西方 | 65 | 0.125 | 0.107 | 0.142 | 14.089 | <0.001 | ||||
年龄 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.986 | 12岁以下 | 41 | 0.114 | 0.092 | 0.137 | 9.845 | <0.001 |
12岁及以上 | 34 | 0.115 | 0.093 | 0.136 | 10.629 | <0.001 | ||||
测量时间间隔 | 5.699 | 1 | 0.017 | 1年以内 | 33 | 0.100 | 0.087 | 0.113 | 15.445 | <0.001 |
1年及以上 | 46 | 0.120 | 0.110 | 0.130 | 23.672 | <0.001 | ||||
侵害类型 | 16.176 | 1 | 0.000 | 外显侵害 | 22 | 0.082 | 0.065 | 0.099 | 9.461 | <0.001 |
关系侵害 | 23 | 0.131 | 0.114 | 0.148 | 14.929 | <0.001 | ||||
评定方式 | 5.351 | 1 | 0.021 | 相同评定者 | 50 | 0.141 | 0.122 | 0.159 | 14.966 | <0.001 |
不同评定者 | 10 | 0.076 | 0.024 | 0.128 | 2.868 | <0.001 | ||||
问题类型 | 17.651 | 3 | 0.001 | 内化问题 | 15 | 0.083 | 0.060 | 0.106 | 7.031 | <0.001 |
抑郁 | 54 | 0.126 | 0.106 | 0.145 | 12.733 | <0.001 | ||||
焦虑 | 23 | 0.061 | 0.036 | 4.698 | 4.698 | <0.001 | ||||
孤独感 | 5 | 0.079 | 0.021 | 0.179 | 1.545 | <0.001 |
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 95% CI | 双尾检验 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB | df | p | 点估计 | 下限 | 上限 | Z值 | p | |||
文化类型 | 0.689 | 1 | 0.406 | 中国 | 4 | 0.051 | 0.014 | 0.088 | 2.686 | 0.007 |
西方 | 23 | 0.071 | 0.040 | 0.102 | 4.502 | <0.001 | ||||
年龄 | 0.055 | 1 | 0.815 | 12岁以下 | 10 | 0.067 | 0.023 | 0.110 | 2.971 | 0.003 |
12岁及以上 | 17 | 0.060 | 0.026 | 0.093 | 3.496 | <0.001 | ||||
测量时间间隔 | 0.080 | 1 | 0.778 | 1年以内 | 10 | 0.059 | 0.016 | 0.102 | 2.675 | 0.007 |
1年及以上 | 18 | 0.066 | 0.034 | 0.099 | 4.033 | <0.001 | ||||
评定方式 | 0.800 | 1 | 0.371 | 相同评定者 | 21 | 0.070 | 0.040 | 0.101 | 4.489 | <0.001 |
不同评定者 | 4 | 0.040 | 0.021 | 0.100 | 1.289 | 0.198 | ||||
问题类型 | 1.055 | 3 | 0.788 | 内化问题 | 7 | 0.048 | -0.001 | 0.097 | 1.925 | 0.054 |
抑郁 | 17 | 0.051 | 0.016 | 0.086 | 2.879 | 0.004 | ||||
焦虑 | 9 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.013 | 2.420 | 0.016 | ||||
孤独感 | 2 | 0.028 | 0.028 | -0.026 | 1.025 | 0.305 |
表6 外显侵害对内化问题预测关系的随机模型分析
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 95% CI | 双尾检验 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB | df | p | 点估计 | 下限 | 上限 | Z值 | p | |||
文化类型 | 0.689 | 1 | 0.406 | 中国 | 4 | 0.051 | 0.014 | 0.088 | 2.686 | 0.007 |
西方 | 23 | 0.071 | 0.040 | 0.102 | 4.502 | <0.001 | ||||
年龄 | 0.055 | 1 | 0.815 | 12岁以下 | 10 | 0.067 | 0.023 | 0.110 | 2.971 | 0.003 |
12岁及以上 | 17 | 0.060 | 0.026 | 0.093 | 3.496 | <0.001 | ||||
测量时间间隔 | 0.080 | 1 | 0.778 | 1年以内 | 10 | 0.059 | 0.016 | 0.102 | 2.675 | 0.007 |
1年及以上 | 18 | 0.066 | 0.034 | 0.099 | 4.033 | <0.001 | ||||
评定方式 | 0.800 | 1 | 0.371 | 相同评定者 | 21 | 0.070 | 0.040 | 0.101 | 4.489 | <0.001 |
不同评定者 | 4 | 0.040 | 0.021 | 0.100 | 1.289 | 0.198 | ||||
问题类型 | 1.055 | 3 | 0.788 | 内化问题 | 7 | 0.048 | -0.001 | 0.097 | 1.925 | 0.054 |
抑郁 | 17 | 0.051 | 0.016 | 0.086 | 2.879 | 0.004 | ||||
焦虑 | 9 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.013 | 2.420 | 0.016 | ||||
孤独感 | 2 | 0.028 | 0.028 | -0.026 | 1.025 | 0.305 |
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 95% CI | 双尾检验 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB | df | p | 点估计 | 下限 | 上限 | Z值 | p | |||
文化类型 | 1.805 | 1 | 0.179 | 中国 | 4 | 0.046 | 0.019 | 0.111 | 1.383 | 0.167 |
西方 | 23 | 0.096 | 0.063 | 0.129 | 5.659 | <0.001 | ||||
年龄 | 0.679 | 1 | 0.410 | 12岁以下 | 9 | 0.105 | 0.057 | 0.152 | 4.322 | <0.001 |
12岁及以上 | 18 | 0.079 | 0.041 | 0.118 | 4.078 | <0.001 | ||||
测量时间间隔 | 1.998 | 1 | 0.157 | 1年以内 | 9 | 0.118 | 0.061 | 0.174 | 4.044 | <0.001 |
1年及以上 | 19 | 0.071 | 0.042 | 0.101 | 4.715 | <0.001 | ||||
评定方式 | 0.561 | 1 | 0.454 | 相同评定者 | 22 | 0.093 | 0.060 | 0.127 | 5.459 | <0.001 |
不同评定者 | 6 | 0.069 | 0.017 | 0.122 | 2.607 | 0.009 | ||||
问题类型 | 0.668 | 3 | 0.881 | 内化问题 | 6 | 0.071 | 0.022 | 0.120 | 2.830 | 0.005 |
抑郁 | 18 | 0.076 | 0.041 | 0.111 | 4.247 | <0.001 | ||||
焦虑 | 9 | 0.059 | -0.009 | 0.127 | 1.713 | 0.087 | ||||
孤独感 | 2 | 0.089 | 0.048 | 0.130 | 4.252 | <0.001 |
表7 关系侵害对内化问题预测关系的随机模型分析
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 95% CI | 双尾检验 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB | df | p | 点估计 | 下限 | 上限 | Z值 | p | |||
文化类型 | 1.805 | 1 | 0.179 | 中国 | 4 | 0.046 | 0.019 | 0.111 | 1.383 | 0.167 |
西方 | 23 | 0.096 | 0.063 | 0.129 | 5.659 | <0.001 | ||||
年龄 | 0.679 | 1 | 0.410 | 12岁以下 | 9 | 0.105 | 0.057 | 0.152 | 4.322 | <0.001 |
12岁及以上 | 18 | 0.079 | 0.041 | 0.118 | 4.078 | <0.001 | ||||
测量时间间隔 | 1.998 | 1 | 0.157 | 1年以内 | 9 | 0.118 | 0.061 | 0.174 | 4.044 | <0.001 |
1年及以上 | 19 | 0.071 | 0.042 | 0.101 | 4.715 | <0.001 | ||||
评定方式 | 0.561 | 1 | 0.454 | 相同评定者 | 22 | 0.093 | 0.060 | 0.127 | 5.459 | <0.001 |
不同评定者 | 6 | 0.069 | 0.017 | 0.122 | 2.607 | 0.009 | ||||
问题类型 | 0.668 | 3 | 0.881 | 内化问题 | 6 | 0.071 | 0.022 | 0.120 | 2.830 | 0.005 |
抑郁 | 18 | 0.076 | 0.041 | 0.111 | 4.247 | <0.001 | ||||
焦虑 | 9 | 0.059 | -0.009 | 0.127 | 1.713 | 0.087 | ||||
孤独感 | 2 | 0.089 | 0.048 | 0.130 | 4.252 | <0.001 |
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 95% CI | 双尾检验 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB | df | p | 点估计 | 下限 | 上限 | Z值 | p | |||
文化类型 | 17.294 | 1 | 0.000 | 中国 | 2 | 0.172 | 0.137 | 0.208 | 9.267 | <0.001 |
西方 | 19 | 0.069 | 0.036 | 0.102 | 4.081 | <0.001 | ||||
年龄 | 0.310 | 1 | 0.578 | 12岁以下 | 7 | 0.093 | 0.019 | 0.167 | 2.459 | 0.014 |
12岁及以上 | 14 | 0.070 | 0.031 | 0.114 | 3.572 | <0.001 | ||||
测量时间间隔 | 12.770 | 1 | 0.000 | 1年以内 | 10 | 0.033 | 0.002 | 0.063 | 2.091 | 0.037 |
1年及以上 | 12 | 0.124 | 0.085 | 0.163 | 6.102 | <0.001 | ||||
评定方式 | 0.694 | 1 | 0.405 | 相同评定者 | 17 | 0.085 | 0.046 | 0.124 | 4.284 | <0.001 |
不同评定者 | 2 | 0.168 | 0.024 | 0.360 | 1.718 | 0.086 | ||||
问题类型 | 27.100 | 3 | 0.000 | 内化问题 | 7 | 0.059 | 0.024 | 0.094 | 3.328 | 0.001 |
抑郁 | 12 | 0.097 | 0.057 | 0.138 | 4.702 | <0.001 | ||||
焦虑 | 8 | 0.037 | -0.033 | 0.107 | 1.025 | 0.305 | ||||
孤独感 | 1 | 0.203 | 0.156 | 0.249 | 8.515 | <0.001 |
表8 内化问题对外显侵害预测关系的随机模型分析
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 95% CI | 双尾检验 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB | df | p | 点估计 | 下限 | 上限 | Z值 | p | |||
文化类型 | 17.294 | 1 | 0.000 | 中国 | 2 | 0.172 | 0.137 | 0.208 | 9.267 | <0.001 |
西方 | 19 | 0.069 | 0.036 | 0.102 | 4.081 | <0.001 | ||||
年龄 | 0.310 | 1 | 0.578 | 12岁以下 | 7 | 0.093 | 0.019 | 0.167 | 2.459 | 0.014 |
12岁及以上 | 14 | 0.070 | 0.031 | 0.114 | 3.572 | <0.001 | ||||
测量时间间隔 | 12.770 | 1 | 0.000 | 1年以内 | 10 | 0.033 | 0.002 | 0.063 | 2.091 | 0.037 |
1年及以上 | 12 | 0.124 | 0.085 | 0.163 | 6.102 | <0.001 | ||||
评定方式 | 0.694 | 1 | 0.405 | 相同评定者 | 17 | 0.085 | 0.046 | 0.124 | 4.284 | <0.001 |
不同评定者 | 2 | 0.168 | 0.024 | 0.360 | 1.718 | 0.086 | ||||
问题类型 | 27.100 | 3 | 0.000 | 内化问题 | 7 | 0.059 | 0.024 | 0.094 | 3.328 | 0.001 |
抑郁 | 12 | 0.097 | 0.057 | 0.138 | 4.702 | <0.001 | ||||
焦虑 | 8 | 0.037 | -0.033 | 0.107 | 1.025 | 0.305 | ||||
孤独感 | 1 | 0.203 | 0.156 | 0.249 | 8.515 | <0.001 |
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 95% CI | 双尾检验 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB | df | p | 点估计 | 下限 | 上限 | Z值 | p | |||
文化类型 | 1.598 | 1 | 0.206 | 中国 | 2 | 0.171 | 0.135 | 0.207 | 9.204 | <0.001 |
西方 | 20 | 0.132 | 0.081 | 0.181 | 5.083 | <0.001 | ||||
年龄 | 0.158 | 1 | 0.691 | 12岁以下 | 6 | 0.125 | 0.048 | 0.201 | 3.188 | <0.001 |
12岁及以上 | 16 | 0.145 | 0.089 | 0.201 | 5.087 | <0.001 | ||||
测量时间间隔 | 5.290 | 1 | 0.021 | 1年以内 | 10 | 0.089 | 0.053 | 0.125 | 4.787 | <0.001 |
1年及以上 | 13 | 0.171 | 0.111 | 0.230 | 5.523 | <0.001 | ||||
评定方式 | 2.101 | 1 | 0.147 | 相同评定者 | 19 | 0.142 | 0.095 | 0.188 | 5.966 | <0.001 |
不同评定者 | 2 | 0.218 | 0.126 | 0.311 | 4.625 | <0.001 | ||||
问题类型 | 11.372 | 3 | 0.000 | 内化问题 | 6 | 0.073 | 0.034 | 0.112 | 3.697 | <0.001 |
抑郁 | 14 | 0.171 | 0.116 | 0.227 | 6.046 | <0.001 | ||||
焦虑 | 9 | 0.089 | 0.024 | 0.154 | 2.698 | 0.007 | ||||
孤独感 | 1 | 0.151 | 0.104 | 0.198 | 6.348 | <0.001 |
表9 内化问题对关系侵害预测关系的随机模型分析
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 95% CI | 双尾检验 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB | df | p | 点估计 | 下限 | 上限 | Z值 | p | |||
文化类型 | 1.598 | 1 | 0.206 | 中国 | 2 | 0.171 | 0.135 | 0.207 | 9.204 | <0.001 |
西方 | 20 | 0.132 | 0.081 | 0.181 | 5.083 | <0.001 | ||||
年龄 | 0.158 | 1 | 0.691 | 12岁以下 | 6 | 0.125 | 0.048 | 0.201 | 3.188 | <0.001 |
12岁及以上 | 16 | 0.145 | 0.089 | 0.201 | 5.087 | <0.001 | ||||
测量时间间隔 | 5.290 | 1 | 0.021 | 1年以内 | 10 | 0.089 | 0.053 | 0.125 | 4.787 | <0.001 |
1年及以上 | 13 | 0.171 | 0.111 | 0.230 | 5.523 | <0.001 | ||||
评定方式 | 2.101 | 1 | 0.147 | 相同评定者 | 19 | 0.142 | 0.095 | 0.188 | 5.966 | <0.001 |
不同评定者 | 2 | 0.218 | 0.126 | 0.311 | 4.625 | <0.001 | ||||
问题类型 | 11.372 | 3 | 0.000 | 内化问题 | 6 | 0.073 | 0.034 | 0.112 | 3.697 | <0.001 |
抑郁 | 14 | 0.171 | 0.116 | 0.227 | 6.046 | <0.001 | ||||
焦虑 | 9 | 0.089 | 0.024 | 0.154 | 2.698 | 0.007 | ||||
孤独感 | 1 | 0.151 | 0.104 | 0.198 | 6.348 | <0.001 |
*元分析用到的参考文献 | |
[1] |
* Adrian, M., Jenness, J. L., Kuehn, K. S., Smith, M. R., & McLaughlin, K. A. (2019). Emotion regulation processes linking peer victimization to anxiety and depression symptoms in adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 31(3), 999-1009.
doi: 10.1017/S0954579419000543 pmid: 31097052 |
[2] |
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 27-51.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231 URL |
[3] |
* Arora, P. G., Wheeler, L. A., Fisher, S., Restituyo, M., & Barnes-Najor, J. (2020). A longitudinal examination of peer victimization on depressive symptoms among Asian American school-aged youth. School Mental Health, 12(4), 732-742.
doi: 10.1007/s12310-020-09383-w URL |
[4] |
* Barchia, K., & Bussey, K. (2010). The psychological impact of peer victimization: Exploring social-cognitive mediators of depression. Journal of Adolescence, 33(5), 615-623.
doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.12.002 URL |
[5] |
Barzilay, S., Klomek, A. B., Apter, A., Carli, V., Wasserman, C., Hadlaczky, G., … Kereszteny, A. (2017). Bullying victimization and suicide ideation and behavior among adolescents in Europe: A 10-country study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 61(2), 179-186.
doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.02.002 URL |
[6] |
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
pmid: 7777651 |
[7] |
Bauminger, N., & Kasari, C. (2000). Loneliness and friendship in high-functioning children with autism. Child Development, 71(2), 447-456.
pmid: 10834476 |
[8] |
Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18(2), 117-127.
doi: 10.1002/1098-2337(1992)18:2<117::AID-AB2480180205>3.0.CO;2-3 URL |
[9] |
* Boivin, M., Hymel, S., & Bukowski, W. M. (1995). The roles of social withdrawal, peer rejection, and victimization by peers in predicting loneliness and depressed mood in childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 7(4), 765-785.
doi: 10.1017/S0954579400006830 URL |
[10] |
Bouman, T., van der Meulen, M., Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., Vermande, M. M., & Aleva, E. A. (2012). Peer and self-reports of victimization and bullying: Their differential association with internalizing problems and social adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 50(6), 759-774.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2012.08.004 pmid: 23245499 |
[11] |
Branson, C. E., & Cornell, D. G. (2009). A comparison of self and peer reports in the assessment of middle school bullying. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 25(1), 5-27.
doi: 10.1080/15377900802484133 URL |
[12] | Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. Handbook of child psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
[13] |
* Brown, S., & Fite, P. J. (2016). Stressful life events predict peer victimization: Does anxiety account for this link? Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(8), 2616-2625.
doi: 10.1007/s10826-016-0428-3 URL |
[14] |
* Burke, T., Sticca, F., & Perren, S. (2017). Everything’s gonna be alright! The longitudinal interplay among social support, peer victimization, and depressive symptoms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(9), 1999-2014.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0653-0 URL |
[15] |
Cao, Y. M., Wang, M. P., Cao, C., Ji, L. Q., & Zhang, W. X. (2017). The interaction between dopamine D2 receptor gene TaqIA polymorphim and peer victimization on early adolescent depression. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(1), 28-39.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00028 URL |
[曹衍淼, 王美萍, 曹丛, 纪林芹, 张文新. (2017). DRD2基因TaqIA多态性与同伴侵害对青少年早期抑郁的交互作用. 心理学报, 49(1), 28-39.] | |
[16] |
Carthy, T., Horesh, N., Apter, A., Edge, M. D., & Gross, J. J. (2010). Emotional reactivity and cognitive regulation in anxious children. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(5), 384-393.
doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.12.013 pmid: 20089246 |
[17] |
Casper, D. M., & Card, N. A. (2017). Overt and relational victimization: A meta-analytic review of their overlap and associations with social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 88(2), 466-483.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.12621 URL |
[18] |
Chang, S. M., Guo, M. Y., Wang, J. M., Wang, L. X., & Zhang, W. X. (2020). The influence of school assets on the development of well-being during early adolescence: Longitudinal mediating effect of intentional self-regulation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(7), 874-885.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00874 URL |
[常淑敏, 郭明宇, 王靖民, 王玲晓, 张文新. (2020). 学校资源对青少年早期幸福感发展的影响: 意向性自我调节的纵向中介作用. 心理学报, 52(7), 874-885.] | |
[19] |
Chen, L., Zhang, W., Ji, L., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2019). Developmental trajectories of Chinese adolescents’ relational aggression: Associations with changes in social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 90(6), 2153-2170.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.13090 URL |
[20] |
* Chen, Y., Zhu, J., & Zhang, W. (2021). Reciprocal longitudinal relations between peer victimization and mobile phone addiction: The explanatory mechanism of adolescent depression. Journal of Adolescence, 89, 1-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.03.003 URL |
[21] | Chen, Z. X., Feng, Y. X., Song, W. L., & Li, X. (2021). The relationship of parent-child separation, peer victimization and depression in adolescents: A longitudinal study. Psychological Development and Education, 37(3), 429-438. |
[陈子循, 冯映雪, 宋文莉, 刘霞. (2021). 亲子分离与青少年同伴侵害和抑郁的关系: 一项追踪研究. 心理发展与教育, 37(3), 429-438.] | |
[22] | * Cooley, J. L., Blossom, J. B., Tampke, E. C., & Fite, P. J. (2020). Emotion regulation attenuates the prospective links from peer victimization to internalizing symptoms during middle childhood. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 53, 1-10. |
[23] |
* Cooley, J. L., Frazer, A. L., Fite, P. J., Brown, S., & DiPierro, M. (2017). Anxiety symptoms as a moderator of the reciprocal links between forms of aggression and peer victimization in middle childhood. Aggressive Behavior, 43(5), 450-459.
doi: 10.1002/ab.21703 pmid: 28217970 |
[24] |
Crick, N. R., & Bigbee, M. A. (1998). Relational and overt victimization: A multi-informant approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 337-347.
pmid: 9583337 |
[25] |
* Desjardins, T. L., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2011). Relational victimization and depressive symptoms in adolescence: Moderating effects of mother, father, and peer emotional support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(5), 531-544.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-010-9562-1 pmid: 20577897 |
[26] |
* Dill, E. J., Vernberg, E. M., Fonagy, P., Twemlow, S. W., & Gamm, B. K. (2004). Negative affect in victimized children: The roles of social withdrawal, peer rejection, and attitudes toward bullying. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32(2), 159-173.
doi: 10.1023/B:JACP.0000019768.31348.81 URL |
[27] | Dong, J. M., Zhou, C., Hou, Y. N., Zhao, L., & Wei, S. H. (2020). The relationship between peer victimization and aggression in stay-behind junior secondary school students: A chain multiple mediation model. Psychological Development and Education, 36(5), 615-623. |
[董及美, 周晨, 侯亚楠, 赵蕾, 魏淑华. (2020). 留守初中生同伴侵害与攻击性的关系: 链式多重中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 36(5), 615-623.] | |
[28] |
* Doyle, S. T., & Sullivan, T. N. (2016). Longitudinal relations between peer victimization, emotion dysregulation, and internalizing symptoms among early adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 37(2), 165-191.
doi: 10.1177/0272431615594458 URL |
[29] | * Drazdowski, T. K., Kliewer, W. L., Farrell, A., Sullivan, T., Roberson-Nay, R., & Jäggi, L. (2019). A longitudinal study of the bidirectional relations between anxiety symptoms and peer victimization in urban adolescents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 36(13-14), NP7183-NP7205. |
[30] |
Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1997). Meta-analysis: Potentials and promise. BMJ, 315(7119), 1371-1374.
pmid: 9432250 |
[31] | * Ehrlich, C. J. (2017). Peer victimization and adolescents’ academic functioning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Miami. |
[32] | * Erath, S. A., Su, S., & Tu, K. M. (2016). Electrodermal reactivity moderates the prospective association between peer victimization and depressive symptoms in early adolescence. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 47(6), 992-1003. |
[33] | Eslea, M., Menesini, E., Morita, Y., O’ Moore, M., Mora-Merchán, J. A., Pereira, B., & Smith, P. K. (2004). Friendship and loneliness among bullies and victims: Data from seven countries. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 30(1), 71-83. |
[34] |
* Forbes, M. K., Fitzpatrick, S., Magson, N. R., & Rapee, R. M. (2019). Depression, anxiety, and peer victimization: Bidirectional relationships and associated outcomes transitioning from childhood to adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(4), 692-702.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0922-6 URL |
[35] | * Fox, J. K., Ryan, J. L., Burch, J. M., & Halpern, L. F. (2021). The role of parental overcontrol in the relationship between peer victimization, social threat cognitions, and social anxiety in school-age children. School Mental Health. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-021-09466-2 |
[36] |
Garandeau, C. F., Lee, I. A., & Salmivalli, C. (2018). Decreases in the proportion of bullying victims in the classroom: Effects on the adjustment of remaining victims. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42(1), 64-72.
doi: 10.1177/0165025416667492 URL |
[37] | * Gibb, B. E., Stone, L. B., & Crossett, S. E. (2012). Peer victimization and prospective changes in children’s inferential styles. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 41(5), 561-569. |
[38] |
Gini, G., Holt, M., Pozzoli, T., & Marino, C. (2020). Victimization and somatic problems: The role of class victimization levels. Journal of School Health, 90(1), 39-46.
doi: 10.1111/josh.12844 URL |
[39] |
* Griese, E. R., & Buhs, E. S. (2014). Prosocial behavior as a protective factor for children’s peer victimization. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(7), 1052-1065.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-0046-y pmid: 24150542 |
[40] |
Gromann, P. M., Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., Pronk, J., & Krabbendam, L. (2013). Self-perception but not peer reputation of bullying victimization is associated with non- clinical psychotic experiences in adolescents. Psychological Medicine, 43(4), 781-787.
doi: 10.1017/S003329171200178X pmid: 22895003 |
[41] |
Guo, H. Y., Chen, L. H., Ye, Z., Pan, J., & Lin, D. H. (2017). Characteristics of peer victimization and the bidirectional relationship between peer victimization and internalizing problems among rural-to-urban migrant children in China: A longitudinal study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(3), 336-348.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00336 URL |
[郭海英, 陈丽华, 叶枝, 潘瑾, 林丹华. (2017). 流动儿童同伴侵害的特点及与内化问题的循环作用关系: 一项追踪研究. 心理学报, 49(3), 336-348.] | |
[42] |
* Hanish, L. D., & Guerra, N. G. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of patterns of adjustment following peer victimization. Development and Psychopathology, 14(1), 69-89.
pmid: 11893095 |
[43] | Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 41(4), 441-455. |
[44] | * Healy, K. L., & Sanders, M. R. (2018). Mechanisms through which supportive relationships with parents and peers mitigate victimization, depression and internalizing problems in children bullied by peers. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 49(5), 800-813. |
[45] | * Helms, S. W., Gallagher, M., Calhoun, C. D., Choukas-Bradley, S., Dawson, G. C., & Prinstein, M. J. (2015). Intrinsic religiosity buffers the longitudinal effects of peer victimization on adolescent depressive symptoms. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44(3), 471-479. |
[46] |
* Henrich, C. C., & Shahar, G. (2014). Moderators of the effect of peer victimization during fifth grade on subsequent symptoms of (anxious) depression: The roles of engagement in bullying and baseline symptomatology. Prevention Science, 15(6), 888-896.
doi: 10.1007/s11121-013-0456-9 URL |
[47] | * Herzig, K. A. (2011). A reciprocal model of peer victimization and psychosocial functioning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut. |
[48] |
Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557-560.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 URL |
[49] |
* Hodges, E. V., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1999). The power of friendship: Protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 94-101.
pmid: 9923467 |
[50] |
* Hodges, E. V., & Perry, D. G. (1999). Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimization by peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 677-685.
pmid: 10234851 |
[51] |
Huang, L., Liang, K., Jiang, W., Huang, Q., Gong, N., & Chi, X. (2021). Prevalence and correlates of mental health problems among Chinese adolescents with frequent peer victimization experiences. Children, 8(5), 403.
doi: 10.3390/children8050403 URL |
[52] |
Huitsing, G., & Veenstra, R. (2012). Bullying in classrooms: Participant roles from a social network perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 38(6), 494-509.
doi: 10.1002/ab.21438 pmid: 22833443 |
[53] |
* Irwin, A., Li, J., Craig, W., & Hollenstein, T. (2019). The role of shame in the relation between peer victimization and mental health outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(1), 156-181.
doi: 10.1177/0886260516672937 URL |
[54] |
* Isaacs, J., Hodges, E. V., & Salmivalli, C. (2008). Long-term consequences of victimization by peers: A follow-up from adolescence to young adulthood. International Journal of Developmental Science, 2(4), 387-397.
doi: 10.3233/DEV-2008-2404 URL |
[55] | Iyer-Eimerbrink, P. A., & Jensen-Campbell, L. A. (2019). The long-term consequences of peer victimization on physical and psychological health: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 24(4), 1-20. |
[56] | Ji, L. Q., Chen, L., Xu, F. Z., Zhao, S. Y., & Zhang, W. X. (2011). A longitudinal analysis of the association between peer victimization and patterns of psychosocial adjustment during middle and late childhood. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43(10), 1151-1162. |
[纪林芹, 陈亮, 徐夫真, 赵守盈, 张文新. (2011). 童年中晚期同伴侵害对儿童心理社会适应影响的纵向分析. 心理学报, 43(10), 1151-1162.] | |
[57] | Ji, L. Q., Pan, B., Wang, C. Y., Lou, P., Chen, L., & Zhang, W. X. (2018). A cross-lagged analysis of associations between peer rejection, peer victimization and depression in early adolescence. Journal of Psychological Science, 41(3), 579-585. |
[纪林芹, 潘斌, 王春燕, 娄萍, 陈亮, 张文新. (2018). 青少年早期同伴拒绝、同伴侵害与抑郁的关系: 交叉滞后分析. 心理科学, 41(3), 579-585.] | |
[58] |
Juvonen, J., & Graham, S. (2014). Bullying in schools: The power of bullies and the plight of victims. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 159-185.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115030 URL |
[59] |
Kawabata, Y. (2020). Measurement of peer and friend relational and physical victimization among early adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 82, 82-85.
doi: S0140-1971(20)30074-9 pmid: 32653767 |
[60] | * Kawabata, Y., & Onishi, A. (2017). Moderating effects of relational interdependence on the association between peer victimization and depressive symptoms. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 48(2), 214-224. |
[61] | * Knoble, N. B. (2015). Adolescent self-regulation and the influence of peer victimization: Examining dynamic interactions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oregon. |
[62] |
* Kochel, K. P., Bagwell, C. L., Ladd, G. W., & Rudolph, K. D. (2017). Do positive peer relations mitigate transactions between depressive symptoms and peer victimization in adolescence? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 51, 44-54.
doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2017.04.003 pmid: 29104337 |
[63] |
* Kochel, K. P., Ladd, G. W., & Rudolph, K. D. (2012). Longitudinal associations among youth depressive symptoms, peer victimization, and low peer acceptance: An interpersonal process perspective. Child Development, 83(2), 637-650.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01722.x pmid: 22313098 |
[64] |
* Kochel, K. P., & Rafferty, D. (2020). Prospective associations between children’s depressive symptoms and peer victimization: The role of social helplessness. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 38(1), 15-30.
doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12301 pmid: 31490572 |
[65] |
* Krygsman, A. L., & Vaillancourt, T. (2017). Longitudinal associations between depression symptoms and peer experiences: Evidence of symptoms-driven pathways. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 51, 20-34.
doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2017.05.003 URL |
[66] |
* Krygsman, A. L., & Vaillancourt, T. (2019). Peer victimization and depression symptoms: The moderating role of gender non-normative aggression and school transition. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(9), 2531-2542.
doi: 10.1007/s10826-018-1119-z |
[67] | * Landoll, R. R. (2012). The new frontier of peer victimization: Prospective associations between adolescents’ on-line peer victimization and internalizing symptoms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Miami. |
[68] |
Lang, P. J., Davis, M., & Öhman, A. (2000). Fear and anxiety: Animal models and human cognitive psychophysiology. Journal of Affective Disorders, 61(3), 137-159.
pmid: 11163418 |
[69] |
* Leadbeater, B. J., Thompson, K., & Sukhawathanakul, P. (2014). It gets better or does it? Peer victimization and internalizing problems in the transition to young adulthood. Development and Psychopathology, 26(3), 675-688.
doi: 10.1017/S0954579414000315 pmid: 25047291 |
[70] |
* Leeuwis, F. H., Koot, H. M., Creemers, D. H., & van Lier, P. A. (2015). Implicit and explicit self-esteem discrepancies, victimization and the development of late childhood internalizing problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(5), 909-919.
doi: 10.1007/s10802-014-9959-5 pmid: 25403344 |
[71] | Lei, L. L., Ran, G. M., Zhang, Q., Mi, Q. W., & Chen, X. (2020). The associations between parenting styles and anxiety in preschool-age children: A three-level meta-analysis. Psychological Development and Education, 36(3), 329-340. |
[雷丽丽, 冉光明, 张琪, 米倩文, 陈旭. (2020). 父母教养方式与幼儿焦虑关系的三水平元分析. 心理发展与教育, 36(3), 329-340.] | |
[72] |
* Lepore, S. J., & Kliewer, W. (2019). Social intelligence attenuates association between peer victimization and depressive symptoms among adolescents. Psychology of Violence, 9(6), 644-652.
doi: 10.1037/vio0000234 URL |
[73] | Lin, C. D. (2018). Developmental psychology. Beijing, China: People’s Education Press. |
[林崇德. (2018). 发展心理学. 北京: 人民教育出版社.] | |
[74] | Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (Eds). (2001). Practical meta analysis. Califrnia: SAGE Publications. |
[75] | Li, T. F. (2017). The longitudinal associations between peer victimization and achievement, problem behavior in early adolescence: Moderating role of number of friends (Unpublished master’s thesis). Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China. |
[李腾飞. (2017). 青少年早期同伴侵害与学习成绩、问题行为的关系: 朋友数量的调节作用 (硕士学位论文). 山东师范大学, 济南.] | |
[76] |
* Liu, J. S., Bullock, A., Coplan, R. J., Chen, X., Li, D., & Zhou, Y. (2018). Developmental cascade models linking peer victimization, depression, and academic achievement in Chinese children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 47-63.
doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12212 URL |
[77] | Liu, J. S., & Zhao, Y. (2013). Predictive relation between peer victimization and behavior problem: A two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Psychological Science, 36(3), 632-637. |
[刘俊升, 赵燕. (2013). 童年中期受欺负与问题行为之关系: 一项两年纵向研究. 心理科学, 36(3), 632-637.] | |
[78] |
Liu, X. W., Pan, B., Chen, L., Li, T. F., Ji, L. Q., & Zhang, W. X. (2021). Healthy context paradox in the association between bullying victimization and externalizing problems: The mediating role of hostile attribution bias. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(2), 170-181.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00170 URL |
[刘晓薇, 潘斌, 陈亮, 李腾飞, 纪林芹, 张文新. (2021). 受欺负与青少年外化问题关系的“健康环境悖论”: 敌意性归因的中介作用. 心理学报, 53(2), 170-181.] | |
[79] |
* Loukas, A., & Pasch, K. E. (2013). Does school connectedness buffer the impact of peer victimization on early adolescents’ subsequent adjustment problems? The Journal of Early Adolescence, 33(2), 245-266.
doi: 10.1177/0272431611435117 URL |
[80] | Lou, P. (2019). The effect of negative peer relationships on depression and the role of social self-concept during middle and late childhood (Unpublished master’s thesis). Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China. |
[娄萍. (2019). 童年中晚期消极同伴关系与抑郁的关系以及社交自我概念的作用 (硕士学位论文). 山东师范大学, 济南.] | |
[81] |
Luchetti, S., & Rapee, R. M. (2014). Liking and perceived probability of victimization of peers displaying behaviors characteristic of anxiety and depression. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 5(2), 212-223.
doi: 10.5127/jep.036913 URL |
[82] |
* Machmutow, K., Perren, S., Sticca, F., & Alsaker, F. D. (2012). Peer victimization and depressive symptoms: Can specific coping strategies buffer the negative impact of cybervictimization? Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17(3), 403-420.
doi: 10.1080/13632752.2012.704310 URL |
[83] |
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224 URL |
[84] |
* McConnell, L. M., & Erath, S. A. (2018). Affiliation value and extracurricular commitment moderate associations between peer victimization and depression. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 58, 49-56.
doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2018.08.006 URL |
[85] |
* McLaughlin, K. A., Hatzenbuehler, M. L., & Hilt, L. M. (2009). Emotion dysregulation as a mechanism linking peer victimization to internalizing symptoms in adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(5), 894-904.
doi: 10.1037/a0015760 pmid: 19803569 |
[86] |
McLeod, B. D., Weisz, J. R., & Wood, J. J. (2007). Examining the association between parenting and childhood depression: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 27(8), 986-1003.
pmid: 17449154 |
[87] |
* Mlawer, F., Hubbard, J. A., Bookhout, M. K., Moore, C. C., Docimo, M. A., Swift, L. E., & Grassetti, S. N. (2019). Bidirectional relations between internalizing symptoms and peer victimization in late childhood. Social Development, 28(4), 942-959.
doi: 10.1111/sode.12371 |
[88] | * Morabito, D. M., Burani, K., & Hajcak, G. (2021). Depressive symptoms prospectively predict peer victimization: A longitudinal study among adolescent females. Child Psychiatry & Human Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-020-01100-7 |
[89] |
* Mulder, S. F., Hutteman, R., & van Aken, M. A. (2017). Predictive effects of social anxiety on increases in future peer victimization for a community sample of middle-school youth. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(5), 588-596.
doi: 10.1177/0165025416662344 URL |
[90] |
Mynard, H., & Joseph, S. (2000). Development of the multidimensional peer-victimization scale. Aggressive Behavior, 26(2), 169-178.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(2000)26:2<169::AID-AB3>3.0.CO;2-A URL |
[91] |
Noret, N., Hunter, S. C., & Rasmussen, S. (2018). The relationship between peer victimization, cognitive appraisals, and adjustment: A systematic review. Journal of School Violence, 17(4), 451-471.
doi: 10.1080/15388220.2017.1423492 URL |
[92] |
* Noret, N., Hunte, S. C., & Rasmussen, S. (2021). The role of cognitive appraisals in the relationship between peer- victimization and depressive symptomatology in adolescents: A longitudinal study. School Mental Health, 13(3), 548-560.
doi: 10.1007/s12310-021-09414-0 URL |
[93] |
Nylund, K., Bellmore, A., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2007). Subtypes, severity, and structural stability of peer victimization: What does latent class analysis say? Child Development, 78(6), 1706-1722.
pmid: 17988316 |
[94] | Oncioiu, S. I., Orri, M., Boivin, M., Geoffroy, M. -C., Arseneault, L., Brendgen, M., … Tremblay, R. E. (2020). Early childhood factors associated with peer victimization trajectories from 6 to 17 years of age. Pediatrics, 145(5), 1-10. |
[95] |
Pagano, M. E., Cassidy, L. J., Little, M., Murphy, J. M., & Jellinek, A. M. S. (2000). Identifying psychosocial dysfunction in School-Age children: The pediatric symptom checklist as a Self-Report measure. Psychology in the Schools, 37(2), 91-106.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(200003)37:2%3C91::AID-PITS1%3E3.0.CO;2-3 pmid: 22328794 |
[96] | * Pan, Y., Yang, C., Liu, G., Chan, M., Liu, C., & Zhang, D. (2020). Peer victimization and problem behaviors: The roles of self-esteem and parental attachment among Chinese adolescents. Child Development, 91(4), 968-983. |
[97] |
* Perren, S., Ettekal, I., & Ladd, G. (2013). The impact of peer victimization on later maladjustment: Mediating and moderating effects of hostile and self-blaming attributions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(1), 46-55.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02618.x URL |
[98] |
* Perron, A., Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Côté, S. M., Tremblay, R. E., & Boivin, M. (2012). Moderating effects of team sports participation on the link between peer victimization and mental health problems. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 5(2), 107-115.
doi: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2012.08.006 URL |
[99] | Pontes, N. M., Ayres, C. G., Lewandowski, C., & Pontes, M. C. (2018). Trends in bullying victimization by gender among US high school students. Research in Nursing & Health, 41(3), 243-251. |
[100] |
Pouwels, J. L., Souren, P. M., Lansu, T. A., & Cillessen, A. H. (2016). Stability of peer victimization: A meta-analysis of longitudinal research. Developmental Review, 40, 1-24.
doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.01.001 URL |
[101] | * Rao, M. A. (2013). Peer victimization and substance use in early adolescence: Longitudinal analyses of risk and protective factors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois. |
[102] |
Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., Boelen, P. A., van der Schoot, M., & Telch, M. J. (2011). Prospective linkages between peer victimization and externalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 37(3), 215-222.
doi: 10.1002/ab.20374 pmid: 21433031 |
[103] |
Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., & Telch, M. J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34(4), 244-252.
doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.07.009 URL |
[104] | * Rodriguez, J. H., Gregus, S. J., Craig, J. T., Pastrana, F. A., & Cavell, T. A. (2020). Anxiety sensitivity and children’s risk for both internalizing problems and peer victimization experiences. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 51(2), 174-186. |
[105] | Rudolph, K. D., Flynn, M., & Abaied, J. L. (2008). A developmental perspective on interpersonal theories of youth depression. In J. R. Z. Abela & B. L. Hankin (Eds.), Handbook of depression in children and adolescents (pp. 79-102). New York: The Guilford Press. |
[106] |
* Rudolph, K. D., Troop-Gordon, W., & Granger, D. A. (2011). Individual differences in biological stress responses moderate the contribution of early peer victimization to subsequent depressive symptoms. Psychopharmacology, 214(1), 209-219.
doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1879-7 pmid: 20505926 |
[107] |
* Saint-Georges, Z., & Vaillancourt, T. (2019). The temporal sequence of depressive symptoms, peer victimization, and self-esteem across adolescence: Evidence for an integrated self-perception driven model. Development and Psychopathology, 32(3), 975-984.
doi: 10.1017/S0954579419000865 URL |
[108] |
Sameroff, A. J., & Mackenzie, M. J. (2003). Research strategies for capturing transactional models of development: The limits of the possible. Development and Psychopathology, 15(3), 613-640.
pmid: 14582934 |
[109] |
* Santo, J. B., Martin-Storey, A., Recchia, H., & Bukowski, W. M. (2018). Self-continuity moderates the association between peer victimization and depressed affect. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 28(4), 875-887.
doi: 10.1111/jora.12372 URL |
[110] |
* Schacter, H. L., & Juvonen, J. (2017). Depressive symptoms, friend distress, and self-blame: Risk factors for adolescent peer victimization. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 51, 35-43.
doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2017.02.005 pmid: 29056807 |
[111] |
Schmidt, F. L., Oh, I. S., & Hayes, T. L. (2009). Fixed-versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: Model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62(1), 97-128.
doi: 10.1348/000711007X255327 URL |
[112] |
Scholte, R. H., Burk, W. J., & Overbeek, G. (2013). Divergence in self-and peer-reported victimization and its association to concurrent and prospective adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(12), 1789-1800.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9896-y pmid: 23315212 |
[113] |
Schwartz, D., Chang, L., & Farver, J. M. (2001). Correlates of victimization in Chinese children’s peer groups. Developmental Psychology, 37(4), 520-532.
pmid: 11444487 |
[114] | * Schwartz, D., Lansford, J. E., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (2015). Peer victimization during middle childhood as a lead indicator of internalizing problems and diagnostic outcomes in late adolescence. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44(3), 393-404. |
[115] |
Sentse, M., Kiuru, N., Veenstra, R., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). A social network approach to the interplay between adolescents’ bullying and likeability over time. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(9), 1409-1420.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0129-4 URL |
[116] |
* Sentse, M., Prinzie, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2017). Testing the direction of longitudinal paths between victimization, peer rejection, and different types of internalizing problems in adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 45(5), 1013-1023.
doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0216-y URL |
[117] |
* Shapero, B. G., Hamilton, J. L., Liu, R. T., Abramson, L. Y., & Alloy, L. B. (2013). Internalizing symptoms and rumination: The prospective prediction of familial and peer emotional victimization experiences during adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 36(6), 1067-1076.
doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.08.011 URL |
[118] |
* Siegel, R. S., La Greca, A. M., & Harrison, H. M. (2009). Peer victimization and social anxiety in adolescents: Prospective and reciprocal relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(8), 1096-1109.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9392-1 URL |
[119] |
Sowislo, J. F., & Orth, U. (2013). Does low self-esteem predict depression and anxiety? A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 1-28.
doi: 10.1037/a0029321 URL |
[120] |
* Spence, S. H., de Young, A., Toon, C., & Bond, S. (2009). Longitudinal examination of the associations between emotional dysregulation, coping responses to peer provocation, and victimization in children. Australian Journal of Psychology, 61(3), 145-155.
doi: 10.1080/00049530802259076 URL |
[121] |
* Storch, E. A., Masia-Warner, C., Crisp, H., & Klein, R. G. (2005). Peer victimization and social anxiety in adolescence: A prospective study. Aggressive Behavior, 31(5), 437-452.
doi: 10.1002/ab.20093 URL |
[122] |
* Sugimura, N., Berry, D., Troop-Gordon, W., & Rudolph, K. D. (2017). Early social behaviors and the trajectory of peer victimization across the school years. Developmental Psychology, 53(8), 1447-1461.
doi: 10.1037/dev0000346 pmid: 28557475 |
[123] | Sun, X. J., Deng, X. P., Zhao, Y. T., & Zhang, X. K. (2019). Peer selection or peer influence process in adolescent aggression: Meta-analysis of longitudinal social network analysis. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27(3), 546-553. |
[孙晓娟, 邓小平, 赵悦彤, 张向葵. (2019). 青少年攻击行为的同伴选择与影响效应: 基于纵向社会网络的元分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 27(3), 546-553.] | |
[124] |
* Sweeting, H., Young, R., West, P., & Der, G. (2006). Peer victimization and depression in early-mid adolescence: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 577-594.
doi: 10.1348/000709905X49890 URL |
[125] |
Tepper, P., Liu, X., Guo, C., Zhai, J., Liu, T., & Li, C. (2008). Depressive symptoms in Chinese children and adolescents: Parent, teacher, and self reports. Journal of Affective Disorders, 111(2), 291-298.
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.03.013 URL |
[126] | * Tran, C. V., Cole, D. A., & Weiss, B. (2012). Testing reciprocal longitudinal relations between peer victimization and depressive symptoms in young adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 41(3), 353-360. |
[127] |
* Troop-Gordon, W., & Gerardy, H. (2012). Parents’ beliefs about peer victimization and children’s socio-emotional development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33(1), 40-52.
doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2011.10.001 URL |
[128] | * Troop-Gordon, W., Rudolph, K. D., Sugimura, N., & Little, T. D. (2015). Peer victimization in middle childhood impedes adaptive responses to stress: A pathway to depressive symptoms. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44(3), 432-445. |
[129] |
* Troop-Gordon, W., & Unhjem, L. (2018). Is preventing peer victimization sufficient? The role of prosocial peer group treatment in children’s socioemotional development. Social Development, 27(3), 619-635.
doi: 10.1111/sode.12283 URL |
[130] | Ttofi, M. M., Farrington, D. P., Lösel, F., & Loeber, R. (2011). Do the victims of school bullies tend to become depressed later in life? A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 3(2), 63-73. |
[131] |
* Vaillancourt, T., Duku, E., Becker, S., Schmidt, L. A., Nicol, J., Muir, C., & MacMillan, H. (2011). Peer victimization, depressive symptoms, and high salivary cortisol predict poorer memory in children. Brain and Cognition, 77(2), 191-199.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.06.012 pmid: 21855200 |
[132] |
van Geel, M., Goemans, A., Zwaanswijk, W., Gini, G., & Vedder, P. (2018). Does peer victimization predict low self-esteem, or does low self-esteem predict peer victimization? Meta- analyses on longitudinal studies. Developmental Review, 49, 31-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2018.07.001 URL |
[133] |
* van Lier, P. A., Vitaro, F., Barker, E. D., Brendgen, M., Tremblay, R. E., & Boivin, M. (2012). Peer victimization, poor academic achievement, and the link between childhood externalizing and internalizing problems. Child Development, 83(5), 1775-1788.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01802.x pmid: 22716904 |
[134] |
* Visconti, K. J., & Troop-Gordon, W. (2010). Prospective relations between children’s responses to peer victimization and their socioemotional adjustment. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31(4), 261-272.
doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2010.05.003 URL |
[135] | * Wang, C. X. (2011). A longitudinal investigation of peer victimization, self-esteem, depression, and anxiety among adolescents: A test of cognitive diathesis-stress theory (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nebraska. |
[136] |
* Wang, J. M., Duong, M., Schwartz, D., Chang, L., & Luo, T. (2014). Interpersonal and personal antecedents and consequences of peer victimization across middle childhood in Hong Kong. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(11), 1934-1945.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-0050-2 URL |
[137] | Wang, J. P., Yu, C. F., Zhen, S. J., & Zeng, S. Q. (2020). Peer victimization and adolescent aggressive behavior: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences), 4, 60-69. |
[王建平, 喻承甫, 甄霜菊, 曾姝倩. (2020). 同伴侵害与青少年攻击行为——心理需求满足与意向性自我调节的作用. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 4, 60-69.] | |
[138] | Wang, X., Chen, L., Pan, B., Li, X. L., Zhang, J., & Zhang, W. X. (2021). Forms and functions of aggression: Reliability and validity of Little’s Aggression Inventory among Chinese middle school students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29(3), 523-528. |
[王昕, 陈亮, 潘斌, 李雪琳, 张洁, 张文新. (2021). 基于功能与形式的攻击分类: 利特尔攻击量表在中国初中生中的信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 29(3), 523-528.] | |
[139] |
Wu, L., Zhang, D., Su, Z., & Hu, T. (2015). Peer victimization among children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review of links to emotional maladjustment. Clinical Pediatrics, 54(10), 941-955.
doi: 10.1177/0009922814567873 URL |
[140] | Xiong, L. (2007). A study on the relationship of peer victimization, depression, and academic achievement in middle childhood (Unpublished master’s thesis). Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China. |
[熊莉. (2007). 童年中期受欺负、抑郁与学业成就的关系研究 (硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.] | |
[141] | Xu, F. Z., Zhang, L. L., Wei, X., Zhang, W. X., Chen, L., Ji, L. Q., & Chen, X. Y. (2015). The stability of internalizing problem and its relation to maternal parenting during early adolescence. Psychological Development and Education, 31(2), 204-211. |
[徐夫真, 张玲玲, 魏星, 张文新, 陈亮, 纪林芹, 陈欣银. (2015). 青少年早期内化问题的稳定性及其与母亲教养的关系. 心理发展与教育, 31(2), 204-211.] | |
[142] | Yang, C. C., Bian, Y. F., Chen, X. Y., & Wang, L. (2016). Gender difference between peer victimization, peer rejection and problems in adolescence: A cross-lagged analysis. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24(4), 631-635. |
[杨晨晨, 边玉芳, 陈欣银, 王莉. (2016). 初中生同伴侵害、同伴拒绝与问题行为关系的性别差异: 交叉滞后分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(4), 631-635.] | |
[143] | Yang, D. H., Wang, Y., & Dong, Q. (2000). Depression and anxiety of secondary school students: Structure and development. Psychological Development and Education, 16(3), 12-17. |
[阳德华, 王耘, 董奇. (2000). 初中生的抑郁与焦虑: 结构与发展特点. 心理发展与教育, 16(3), 12-17.] | |
[144] | Yang, X. X., Chen, L., Cao, Y. M., Bi, X. W., Chen, G. H., & Zhang, W. X. (2020). Peer victimization during early adolescence: Person centered analysis. Psychological Development and Education, 36(2), 146-156. |
[杨晓霞, 陈亮, 曹衍淼, 毕馨文, 陈光辉, 张文新. (2020). 青少年早期同伴侵害的亚类别及其稳定性: 个体定向的分析. 心理发展与教育, 36(2), 146-156.] | |
[145] |
Yap, M. B. H., & Jorm, A. F. (2015). Parental factors associated with childhood anxiety, depression, and internalizing problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 175, 424-440.
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.050 URL |
[146] |
Ye, J., & Zhang, S. F. (2018). Relationship between resilience and well-being in elders: A systematic review and meta- analysis. Advances in Psychological Science, 29(2), 202-217.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.00202 URL |
[叶静, 张戌凡. (2018). 老年人心理韧性与幸福感的关系: 一项元分析. 心理科学进展, 29(2), 202-217.] | |
[147] | * Yeung, R. S. (2010). Understanding the course of peer victimization and internalizing problems among adolescents: Building strength through parent, friend, and dating partner emotional (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Victoria. |
[148] |
* Yeung, R. S., & Leadbeater, B. (2010). Adults make a difference: The protective effects of parent and teacher emotional support on emotional and behavioral problems of peer- victimized adolescents. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(1), 80-98.
doi: 10.1002/jcop.20353 URL |
[149] |
* Yeung Thompson, R. S., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2013). Peer victimization and internalizing symptoms from adolescence into young adulthood: Building strength through emotional support. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(2), 290-303.
pmid: 27307688 |
[150] | Yu, G. L., Li, J. L., & Wang, Q. (2018). Ecological systems theory and adolescents’ mental health education. Educational Research, 39(3), 110-117. |
[俞国良, 李建良, 王勍. (2018). 生态系统理论与青少年心理健康教育. 教育研究, 39(3), 110-117.] | |
[151] | Yun, I. (2008). Wengu zhisxin: Review the old and know the new. Asia Pacific Journal of Police & Criminal Justice, 6(1), 3-23. |
[152] |
* Zapolski, T. C., Rowe, A. T., Fisher, S., Hensel, D. J., & Barnes-Najor, J. (2018). Peer victimization and substance use: Understanding the indirect effect of depressive symptomatology across gender. Addictive Behaviors, 84, 160-166.
doi: S0306-4603(18)30293-4 pmid: 29698871 |
[153] | Zhang, W. X., & Chen, G. H. (2009). Developmental contextualism: An instance of development system theories. Advances in Psychological Science, 17(4), 736-744. |
[张文新, 陈光辉. (2009). 发展情境论——一种新的发展系统理论. 心理科学进展, 17(4), 736-744.] | |
[154] |
Zhang, W. X., Chen, L., Ji, L. Q., Zhang, L. L., Chen, G. H., & Wang, S. Q. (2009). Physical and relational victimization, and children’s emotional adjustment in middle childhood. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41(5), 433-443.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2009.00433 URL |
[张文新, 陈亮, 纪林芹, 张玲玲, 陈光辉, 王姝琼. (2009). 童年中期身体侵害、关系侵害与儿童的情绪适应. 心理学报, 41(5), 433-443.] | |
[155] |
Zhang, X., Chen, H. C., Zhang, G. F., Zhou, B. F., & Wu, W. (2008). A dynamic interaction model of parent-child relationship and problem behavior: A follow-up study in early childhood. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 40(5), 571-582.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2008.00571 URL |
[张晓, 陈会昌, 张桂芳, 周博芳, 吴巍. (2008). 亲子关系与问题行为的动态相互作用模型: 对儿童早期的追踪研究. 心理学报, 40(5), 571-582.] | |
[156] |
Zhang, Y. L., Li, S., & Yu, G. L. (2020). The relationship between loneliness and mobile phone addiction: A meta-analysis. Advances in Psychological Science, 28(11), 1836-1852.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.01836 URL |
[张亚利, 李森, 俞国良. (2020). 孤独感和手机成瘾的关系: 一项元分析. 心理科学进展, 28(11), 1836-1852.] | |
[157] | Zhao, D. M., & Zhou, Z. K. (2010). Aggressive behaviors in children’s experiences with peer: Culture chracteristics and gender differences. Journal of Psychological Science, 33(1), 144-146. |
[赵冬梅, 周宗奎. (2010). 儿童同伴交往中的攻击行为: 文化和性别特征. 心理科学, 33(1): 144-146.] | |
[158] | Zhou, Z. K., Zhao, D. M., Sun, X. J., & Ding, X. F. (2006). Children’s experiences with peers and loneliness: A two- year longitudinal study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38(5), 743-750. |
[周宗奎, 赵冬梅, 孙晓军, 定险峰. (2006). 儿童的同伴交往与孤独感: 一项2年纵向研究. 心理学报, 38(5), 743-750.] |
[1] | 陈诗韵, 屈笛扬, 卜禾, 梁凯欣, 张沛超, 迟新丽. 迷“网”的少年:网瘾风险青少年的症状演化*[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(9): 1465-1476. |
[2] | 孟现鑫, 俞德霖, 陈怡静, 张玲, 傅小兰. 儿童期创伤与共情的关系:一项三水平元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(8): 1285-1300. |
[3] | 肖家乐, 申子姣, 李晓燕, 林丹华. 同伴侵害变化轨迹及其与抑郁情绪和外化问题的关系:共同增强还是风险易感[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(6): 978-993. |
[4] | 李超平, 孟雪, 胥彦, 蓝媛美. 家庭支持型主管行为对员工的影响与作用机制:基于元分析的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(2): 257-271. |
[5] | 靳娟娟, 邵蕾, 黄潇潇, 张亚利, 俞国良. 社会排斥与攻击的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(12): 1979-1996. |
[6] | 孙亚茹, 刘泽军, 段亚杰, 陈宁, 刘伟. 协作如何减少记忆错误:一项元分析研究[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(11): 1780-1792. |
[7] | 陈必忠, 黄璇, 牛更枫, 孙晓军, 蔡志慧. 学步期至青年期社交焦虑的发展轨迹和稳定性:一项基于纵向研究的三水平元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(10): 1637-1652. |
[8] | 段文婷, 孙启武, 王铭, 吴才智, 陈真珍. 青少年早期亲社会行为倾向、内化问题和外化问题发展级联的个体内分析[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(7): 813-827. |
[9] | 蓝媛美, 李超平, 王佳燕, 孟雪. 员工跨界行为的收益与代价:元分析的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(6): 665-683. |
[10] | 司继伟, 郭凯玥, 赵晓萌, 张明亮, 李红霞, 黄碧娟, 徐艳丽. 小学儿童数学焦虑的潜在类别转变及其父母教育卷入效应:3年纵向考察[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(4): 355-370. |
[11] | 梁一鸣, 杨璐溪, 席居哲, 刘正奎. 睡眠问题在创伤后应激障碍各症状间的独特作用:基于交叉滞后网络分析模型[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(10): 1206-1215. |
[12] | 辛素飞, 梁鑫, 盛靓, 赵智睿. 我国内地教师主观幸福感的变迁(2002~2019):横断历史研究的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(8): 875-889. |
[13] | 张文芸, 李晓云, 姚俊杰, 叶倩, 彭微微. 自闭症谱系障碍个体的疼痛敏感性异常:来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(6): 613-628. |
[14] | 张亚利, 李森, 俞国良. 社交媒体使用与错失焦虑的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(3): 273-290. |
[15] | 张丽华, 朱贺. 自恋与攻击性关系的元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(11): 1228-1243. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||