心理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2): 141-153.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00141
收稿日期:
2020-09-23
发布日期:
2021-12-24
出版日期:
2022-02-25
通讯作者:
王争艳
E-mail:wangzhengyan@cnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
ZHANG Qing1,2,3, WANG Zhengyan1()
Received:
2020-09-23
Online:
2021-12-24
Published:
2022-02-25
Contact:
WANG Zhengyan
E-mail:wangzhengyan@cnu.edu.cn
摘要:
为同时探究外部因素与内部因素对学步儿执行功能的影响, 对163对母婴进行追踪测量。婴儿6个月时根据母婴自由互动录像编码母亲敏感性; 使用最长注视时长范式测量婴儿注意特征; 使用母亲报告的《婴儿行为问卷—修订短版》测量婴儿气质; 24个月时使用多位置寻找任务、形状Stroop任务、逆转分类任务、延迟满足任务测量学步儿执行功能。结果发现:(1)婴儿6个月最长注视时长能够显著正向预测24个月的多位置寻找与延迟满足任务得分。(2)母亲敏感性能够正向预测气质外向性低的婴儿24个月时的逆转分类任务表现, 对气质外向性高的婴儿24个月时的逆转分类任务表现的预测不显著。(3)母亲敏感性能够正向预测最长注视时长更长的婴儿24个月时的形状Stroop任务得分; 负向预测最长注视时长更短的婴儿24个月时的形状Stroop任务得分。研究发现了针对不同特征的婴儿, 母亲的养育敏感性对学步儿执行功能影响的差异, 这对早期教育应该如何“因材施教”有所启示。
中图分类号:
张青, 王争艳. (2022). 母亲敏感性与婴儿气质、注意对学步儿执行功能影响的交互作用:一项两年的追踪研究. 心理学报, 54(2), 141-153.
ZHANG Qing, WANG Zhengyan. (2022). The interplay of maternal sensitivity and infant temperament and attention in predicting toddlers’ executive function: A two-year longitudinal study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(2), 141-153.
变量 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. T1母亲敏感性 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
2. T1外向性 | 0.01 | 1.00 | |||||||||||
3. T1消极情绪性 | -0.12 | 0.18* | 1.00 | ||||||||||
4. T1调节性 | 0.04 | 0.52** | -0.23** | 1.00 | |||||||||
5. T1最长注视时长 | 0.18* | 0.06 | -0.01 | 0.14 | 1.00 | ||||||||
6. T2多位置寻找任务 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.17* | 1.00 | |||||||
7. T2形状Stroop任务 | -0.02 | -0.07 | -0.04 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 1.00 | ||||||
8. T2逆转分类任务 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.05 | -0.04 | -0.01 | -0.01 | 0.03 | 1.00 | |||||
9. T2延迟满足任务 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.22* | 0.03 | -0.04 | 0.03 | 1.00 | ||||
10. T2日龄 | 0.01 | -0.12 | -0.03 | -0.17* | -0.10 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.10 | -0.13 | 1.00 | |||
11. T2语言 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.03 | -0.09 | -0.00 | 0.22* | 0.03 | 0.15+ | 0.05 | 1.00 | ||
12. T2母亲受教育水平 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.15+ | 0.07 | 0.15+ | 0.16+ | 0.06 | -0.02 | 1.00 | |
13. T2父亲受教育水平 | 0.07 | -0.09 | -0.09 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.17+ | 0.11 | 0.22* | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.51** | 1.00 |
M | 0.37 | 4.6 | 3.32 | 5.05 | 13.65 | 8.38 | 5.6 | 0.48 | 66.45 | 754.67 | 502.41 | 4.14 | 4.17 |
SD | 0.2 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 3.44 | 3.44 | 3.78 | 0.33 | 71.21 | 30.92 | 251.43 | 0.81 | 0.82 |
N | 153 | 153 | 153 | 153 | 145 | 151 | 140 | 138 | 150 | 163 | 154 | 149 | 154 |
表1 主要变量的描述性统计与相关分析表
变量 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. T1母亲敏感性 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
2. T1外向性 | 0.01 | 1.00 | |||||||||||
3. T1消极情绪性 | -0.12 | 0.18* | 1.00 | ||||||||||
4. T1调节性 | 0.04 | 0.52** | -0.23** | 1.00 | |||||||||
5. T1最长注视时长 | 0.18* | 0.06 | -0.01 | 0.14 | 1.00 | ||||||||
6. T2多位置寻找任务 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.17* | 1.00 | |||||||
7. T2形状Stroop任务 | -0.02 | -0.07 | -0.04 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 1.00 | ||||||
8. T2逆转分类任务 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.05 | -0.04 | -0.01 | -0.01 | 0.03 | 1.00 | |||||
9. T2延迟满足任务 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.22* | 0.03 | -0.04 | 0.03 | 1.00 | ||||
10. T2日龄 | 0.01 | -0.12 | -0.03 | -0.17* | -0.10 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.10 | -0.13 | 1.00 | |||
11. T2语言 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.03 | -0.09 | -0.00 | 0.22* | 0.03 | 0.15+ | 0.05 | 1.00 | ||
12. T2母亲受教育水平 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.15+ | 0.07 | 0.15+ | 0.16+ | 0.06 | -0.02 | 1.00 | |
13. T2父亲受教育水平 | 0.07 | -0.09 | -0.09 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.17+ | 0.11 | 0.22* | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.51** | 1.00 |
M | 0.37 | 4.6 | 3.32 | 5.05 | 13.65 | 8.38 | 5.6 | 0.48 | 66.45 | 754.67 | 502.41 | 4.14 | 4.17 |
SD | 0.2 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 3.44 | 3.44 | 3.78 | 0.33 | 71.21 | 30.92 | 251.43 | 0.81 | 0.82 |
N | 153 | 153 | 153 | 153 | 145 | 151 | 140 | 138 | 150 | 163 | 154 | 149 | 154 |
变量 | 第一层 | 第二层 | 第三层 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | t | p | β | t | p | β | t | p | |
儿童日龄 | 0.11 | 1.18 | 0.24 | 0.12 | 1.26 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 1.42 | 0.16 |
父亲受教育水平 | -0.02 | -0.17 | 0.87 | -0.02 | -0.19 | 0.85 | -0.03 | -0.27 | 0.79 |
母亲受教育水平 | 0.15 | 1.36 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 1.31 | 0.19 | 0.14 | 1.31 | 0.19 |
词汇表达 | 0.03 | 0.33 | 0.75 | 0.02 | 0.20 | 0.84 | -0.001 | -0.01 | 0.99 |
母亲敏感性 | 0.07 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.04 | 0.48 | 0.64 | |||
外向性 | 0.04 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.87 | |||
母亲敏感性×外向性 | -0.19 | -2.05* | 0.04 | ||||||
R2 | 0.031 | 0.037 | 0.072 | ||||||
ΔR2 | 0.031 | 0.006 | 0.035 |
表2 母亲敏感性与气质外向性对逆转分类任务表现的预测作用
变量 | 第一层 | 第二层 | 第三层 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | t | p | β | t | p | β | t | p | |
儿童日龄 | 0.11 | 1.18 | 0.24 | 0.12 | 1.26 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 1.42 | 0.16 |
父亲受教育水平 | -0.02 | -0.17 | 0.87 | -0.02 | -0.19 | 0.85 | -0.03 | -0.27 | 0.79 |
母亲受教育水平 | 0.15 | 1.36 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 1.31 | 0.19 | 0.14 | 1.31 | 0.19 |
词汇表达 | 0.03 | 0.33 | 0.75 | 0.02 | 0.20 | 0.84 | -0.001 | -0.01 | 0.99 |
母亲敏感性 | 0.07 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.04 | 0.48 | 0.64 | |||
外向性 | 0.04 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.87 | |||
母亲敏感性×外向性 | -0.19 | -2.05* | 0.04 | ||||||
R2 | 0.031 | 0.037 | 0.072 | ||||||
ΔR2 | 0.031 | 0.006 | 0.035 |
变量 | 第一层 | 第二层 | 第三层 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | t | p | β | t | p | β | t | p | |
儿童日龄 | 0.07 | 0.67 | 0.50 | 0.07 | 0.70 | 0.49 | 0.06 | 0.59 | 0.56 |
父亲受教育水平 | 0.06 | 0.49 | 0.63 | 0.06 | 0.51 | 0.61 | 0.08 | 0.66 | 0.51 |
母亲受教育水平 | -0.03 | -0.27 | 0.79 | -0.03 | -0.26 | 0.80 | -0.06 | -0.52 | 0.61 |
词汇表达 | 0.20 | 2.06 | 0.04 | 0.23 | 2.22 | 0.03 | 0.20* | 2.00 | 0.05 |
母亲敏感性 | -0.06 | -0.61 | 0.54 | -0.004 | -0.04 | 0.97 | |||
最长注视时长 | 0.08 | 0.77 | 0.44 | -0.10 | -0.76 | 0.45 | |||
母亲敏感性×最长注视时长 | 0.28 | 2.27* | 0.03 | ||||||
R2 | 0.049 | 0.057 | 0.106 | ||||||
ΔR2 | 0.049 | 0.008 | 0.049 |
表3 母亲敏感性与婴儿最长注视时长对形状Stroop任务表现的预测
变量 | 第一层 | 第二层 | 第三层 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | t | p | β | t | p | β | t | p | |
儿童日龄 | 0.07 | 0.67 | 0.50 | 0.07 | 0.70 | 0.49 | 0.06 | 0.59 | 0.56 |
父亲受教育水平 | 0.06 | 0.49 | 0.63 | 0.06 | 0.51 | 0.61 | 0.08 | 0.66 | 0.51 |
母亲受教育水平 | -0.03 | -0.27 | 0.79 | -0.03 | -0.26 | 0.80 | -0.06 | -0.52 | 0.61 |
词汇表达 | 0.20 | 2.06 | 0.04 | 0.23 | 2.22 | 0.03 | 0.20* | 2.00 | 0.05 |
母亲敏感性 | -0.06 | -0.61 | 0.54 | -0.004 | -0.04 | 0.97 | |||
最长注视时长 | 0.08 | 0.77 | 0.44 | -0.10 | -0.76 | 0.45 | |||
母亲敏感性×最长注视时长 | 0.28 | 2.27* | 0.03 | ||||||
R2 | 0.049 | 0.057 | 0.106 | ||||||
ΔR2 | 0.049 | 0.008 | 0.049 |
图2 最长注视时长调节母亲敏感性与形状Stroop任务得分的显著区间 注: 黑色点划线为简单斜率值, 即母亲敏感性对24个月形状Stroop任务的预测效应; 上下两条红色曲线分别为95%置信区间上限与下限(置信区间上下限不包含0的区间为显著性区间); 蓝色虚线为x = -0.74, x = 1.93。
[1] | Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. |
[2] | Bell, M. A., Wolfe, C., & Adkins-Friedman, D. (2007). Frontal lobe development during infancy and childhood. Human Behavior, Learning, and the Developing Brain: Typical Development. |
[3] |
Bernier, A., Carlson, S. M., Deschênes, M., & Matte-Gagné, C. (2012). Social factors in the development of early executive functioning: A closer look at the caregiving environment. Developmental Science, 15(1), 12-24.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01093.x pmid: 22251288 |
[4] |
Bernier, A., Carlson, S. M., & Whipple, N. (2010). From external regulation to self-regulation: Early parenting precursors of young children’s executive functioning. Child Development, 81(1), 326-339.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01397.x pmid: 20331670 |
[5] |
Blair, C., & Raver, C. C. (2015). School readiness and self-regulation: A developmental psychobiological approach. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 711-731.
doi: 10.1146/psych.2015.66.issue-1 URL |
[6] | Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London: Tavistock. |
[7] |
Carlson, S. M., Mandell, D. J. & Williams, L. (2004). Executive function and theory of mind: Stability and prediction from ages 2 to 3. Developmental Psychology, 40(6), 1105-1122.
doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1105 URL |
[8] |
Casalin, S., Luyten, P., Vliegen, N., & Meurs, P. (2012). The structure and stability of temperament from infancy to toddlerhood: A one-year prospective study. Infant Behavior and Development, 35(1), 94-108.
doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.08.004 pmid: 21962396 |
[9] |
Cheng, N., Lu, S., Archer, M., & Wang, Z. (2017). Quality of maternal parenting of 9-month-old infants predicts executive function performance at 2 and 3 years of age. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2293.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02293 URL |
[10] |
Chugani, H. T., Behen, M. E., Muzik, O., Juhász, C., Nagy, F., & Chugani, D. C. (2001). Local brain functional activity following early deprivation: A study of postinstitutionalized Romanian orphans. Neuroimage, 14(6), 1290-1301.
pmid: 11707085 |
[11] | Cicchetti, D., & Cohen, D. J. (2015). The development of the prefrontal cortex: The maturation of neurotransmitter systems and their interactions. In Developmental Psychopathology, (Second Edition). |
[12] |
Clark, C. A. C., Chevalier, N., Nelson, J. M., James, T. D., & Espy, K. A.. (2016). I. executive control in early childhood: Executive control in early childhood. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 81(4), 7-29.
doi: 10.1111/mono.12268 pmid: 27943323 |
[13] |
Colombo, J. (1995). On the neural mechanisms underlying developmental and individual differences in visual fixation in infancy: Two hypotheses. Developmental Review, 15(2), 97-135.
doi: 10.1006/drev.1995.1005 URL |
[14] |
Colombo, J. (2001). The development of visual attention in infancy. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 337-367
pmid: 11148309 |
[15] | Colombo, J., Kapa, L., & Curtindale, L. (2010). Varieties of attention in infancy. In L. M. Oakes, C. H. Cashon, M. Casasola, & D. H. Rakison (Eds.), Infant perception and cognition: Recent advances, emerging theories, and future directions (pp.3-26). New York: Oxford University Press. |
[16] |
Colombo, J., Mitchell, D. W., Coldren, J. T., & Freeseman, L. J. (1991). Individual differences in infant visual attention: Are short lookers faster processors or feature processors?. Child Development, 62(6), 1247-1257.
pmid: 1786713 |
[17] |
Conway, A., & Stifter, C. A. (2012). Longitudinal antecedents of executive function in preschoolers. Child Development, 83(3), 1022-1036.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01756.x pmid: 22469209 |
[18] | Cuevas, K., & Bell, M. A. (2014). Infant attention and early childhood executive function. Child Development, 85(2), 397-404. |
[19] |
Cuevas, K., Deater-Deckard, K., Kim-Spoon, J., Watson, A. J., Morasch, K. C., & Bell, M. A. (2014). What’s mom got to do with it? Contributions of maternal executive function and caregiving to the development of executive function across early childhood. Developmental Science, 17(2), 224-238.
doi: 10.1111/desc.2014.17.issue-2 URL |
[20] |
de Bellis, M. D. (2001). Developmental traumatology: The psychobiological development of maltreated children and its implications for research, treatment, and policy. Development and Psychopathology, 13(3), 539-564.
pmid: 11523847 |
[21] | Devine, R. T., Ribner, A., & Hughes, C. (2019). Measuring and predicting individual differences in executive functions at 14 Months: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 90(5), e618-e636. |
[22] | Diamond, A. (2002). Normal development of prefrontal cortex from birth to young adulthood:Cognitive functions, anatomy, and biochemistry. In D. Stuss & R. Knight (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe function (pp.466-503). New York: Oxford. |
[23] |
Frick, M. A., Forslund, T., & Brocki, K. C. (2019). Does child verbal ability mediate the relationship between maternal sensitivity and later self-regulation? A longitudinal study from infancy to 4 years. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 60(2), 97-105.
doi: 10.1111/sjop.2019.60.issue-2 URL |
[24] |
Frick, M. A., Forslund, T., Fransson, M., Johansson, M., Bohlin, G., & Brocki, K. C. (2018). The role of sustained attention, maternal sensitivity, and infant temperament in the development of early self-regulation. British Journal of Psychology, 109(2), 277-298.
doi: 10.1111/bjop.2018.109.issue-2 URL |
[25] |
Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008). Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 31-60
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.31 URL |
[26] |
Gartstein, M. A., & Rothbart, M. K. (2003). Studying infant temperament via the Revised Infant Behavior Questionnaire. Infant Behavior and Development, 26(1), 64-86.
doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00169-8 URL |
[27] | Gunnar, M. R., & Vazquez, D. (2006). Stress neurobiology and developmental psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Vol 2. Developmental Neuroscience (2nd ed.; pp. 533-577). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley |
[28] |
Guy, M. W., Reynolds, G. D., & Zhang, D. (2013). Visual attention to global and local stimulus properties in 6-month- old infants: Individual differences and event-related potentials. Child Development, 84(4), 1392-1406.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.12053 URL |
[29] |
Hendry, A., Jones, E. J. H., & Charman, T. (2016). Executive function in the first three years of life: Precursors, predictors and patterns. Developmental Review, 42, 1-33.
doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.005 URL |
[30] |
Holochwost, S. J., Gariépy, J.-L., Propper, C. B., Gardner-Neblett, N., Volpe, V., Neblett, E., & Mills-Koonce, W. R. (2016). Sociodemographic risk, parenting, and executive functions in early childhood: The role of ethnicity. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 537-549.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.02.001 URL |
[31] |
Johansson, M., Marciszko, C., Brocki, K., & Bohlin, G. (2016). Individual differences in early executive functions: A longitudinal study from 12 to 36 months. Infant and Child Development, 25(6), 533-549.
doi: 10.1002/icd.v25.6 URL |
[32] |
Kim, S., & Kochanska, G. (2012). Child temperament moderates effects of parent-child mutuality on self-regulation: A relationship-based path for emotionally negative infants. Child Development, 83(4), 1275-1289.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.2012.83.issue-4 URL |
[33] |
Kochanska, G., Murray, K. T., & Harlan, E. T. (2000). Effortful control in early childhood: Continuity and change, antecedents, and implications for social development. Developmental Psychology, 36(2), 220-232.
pmid: 10749079 |
[34] |
Komsi, N., Räikkönen, K., Pesonen, A.-K., Heinonen, K., Keskivaara, P., Järvenpää, A.-L., & Strandberg, T. E. (2006). Continuity of temperament from infancy to middle childhood. Infant Behavior and Development, 29(4), 494-508.
doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.05.002 URL |
[35] |
Kraybill, J. H., & Bell, M. A. (2013). Infancy predictors of preschool and post-kindergarten executive function. Developmental Psychobiology, 55(5), 530-538.
doi: 10.1002/dev.21057 pmid: 22692790 |
[36] | Leerkes, E. M., Blankson, A. N., O'Brien, M., Calkins, S. D., & Marcovitch, S. (2011). The relation of maternal emotional and cognitive support during problem solving to pre-academic skills in preschoolers. Infant & Child Development, 20(6), 353-370. |
[37] | Lewis, C., & Carpendale, J. I. (2009). Introduction: Links between social interaction and executive function. New directions for child and adolescent development, 2009(123), 1-15. |
[38] |
Lin, Q., Wang, Z. Y., Lu, S., Liang, X., He, Q., Wang, Z., & Hu, R. S. (2014). Internal working models of toddlers: A bridge from maternal sensitivity to toddlers’ attachment Behaviors. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(3), 353-366.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.00353 URL |
[ 林青, 王争艳, 卢珊, 梁熙, 贺琼, 王朝, 胡若时. (2014). 从母亲的敏感性到学步儿的依恋安全性:内部工作模式的桥梁作用. 心理学报, 46(3), 353-366.] | |
[39] | Luria, A. R. (1966). Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic Books. |
[40] |
Miller, S. E., & Marcovitch, S. (2015). Examining executive function in the second year of life: Coherence, stability, and relations to joint attention and language. Developmental Psychology, 51(1), 101-114.
doi: 10.1037/a0038359 URL |
[41] | Moran, G., Pederson, D. R., & Tarabulsy, G. M. (2011). Becoming sensitive to sensitivity:Lessons learned from the development of the Maternal Behavior Q-Sort. In D.W. Davis & C. Logdson (Eds.), Maternal sensitivity: A critical review for practitioners. Haupauge, NY: Nova Publishers |
[42] | Nigg, J. T. (2016). Annual research review: On the relations among self-regulation, self-control, executive functioning, effortful control, cognitive control, impulsivity, risk-taking, and inhibition for developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 58(4), 361-383. |
[43] |
Noble, K. G., Norman, M. F., & Farah, M. J. (2005). Neurocognitive correlates of socioeconomic status in kindergarten children. Developmental Science, 8(1), 74-87.
doi: 10.1111/desc.2005.8.issue-1 URL |
[44] | Pederson, D. R., Moran, G., & Bento, S. (2009). Assessing maternal sensitivity and the quality of mother-infant interactions using The Maternal Behavior Q-Sort (MBQS). Pederson-Moran MBQS Manual. (unpublished manuscript). Western University at Ontario, Canada. |
[45] |
Putnam, S. P., Rothbart, M. K., & Gartstein, M. A. (2008). Homotypic and heterotypic continuity of fine-grained temperament during infancy, toddlerhood, and early childhood. Infant and Child Development, 17(4), 387-405.
doi: 10.1002/icd.v17:4 URL |
[46] |
Raikes, H. A., Robinson, J. L., Bradley, R. H., Raikes, H. H., & Ayoub, C. C. (2007). Developmental trends in self-regulation among low-income toddlers. Social Development, 16(1), 128-149.
doi: 10.1111/sode.2007.16.issue-1 URL |
[47] |
Richards, J. E., & Casey, B. J. (1991). Heart rate variability during attention phases in young infants. Psychophysiology, 28(1), 43-53.
pmid: 1886963 |
[48] |
Rochette, È., & Bernier, A. (2016). Parenting and preschoolers’ executive functioning: A case of differential susceptibility? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(2), 151-161.
doi: 10.1177/0165025414557370 URL |
[49] |
Rose, S. A., & Feldman, J. F. (1997). Memory and speed: Their role in the relation of infant information processing to later IQ. Child Development, 68, 630-641.
pmid: 9306643 |
[50] |
Rothbart, M. K. (1981). Measurement of temperament in infancy. Child Development, 52(2), 569-578.
doi: 10.2307/1129176 URL |
[51] | Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Temperament, development, and personality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 207-212. |
[52] | Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., & Evans, D. E. (2000). Temperament and personality: Origins and outcomes. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 78(1), 122-135. |
[53] | Rothbart, M. K., Ellis, L. K., & Posner, M. I. (2013). Temperament and self-regulation. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation, second edition: Research, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford Press. |
[54] | Sigman, M., Cohen, S. E., & Beckwith, L. (1997). Why does infant attention predict adolescent intelligence?. Infant Behavior & Development, 20(2), 133-140. |
[55] |
Suor, J. H., Sturge-Apple, M. L., Davies, P. T., & Jones- Gordils, H. R. (2019). The interplay between parenting and temperament in associations with children's executive function. Journal of family psychology, 33(7), 841-850.
doi: 10.1037/fam0000558 URL |
[56] |
Towe-Goodman, N. R., Willoughby, M., Blair, C., Gustafsson, H. C., Mills-koonce, W. R., & Cox, M. J. (2014). Fathers’ sensitive parenting and the development of early executive functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(6), 867-876.
doi: 10.1037/a0038128 pmid: 25347539 |
[57] | Tardif, T., Fletcher, P., Zhang, Z. X., & Liang, W. L. (2008). Chinese Communicative Development Inventories (Putonghua and Cantonese versions): User's Guide and Manual. Beijing, China: Peking University Medical Press. |
[ Twila, Tardif. (2008). 汉语沟通发展量表使用手册: 普通话及广东话版本. 北京大学医学出版社.] | |
[58] | Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. |
[59] |
Wiebe, S. A., Espy, K. A., & Charak, D. (2008). Using confirmatory factor analysis to understand executive control in preschool children: I. Latent structure. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 575-587
doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.575 URL |
[60] |
Wiebe, S. A., Sheffield, T., Nelson, J. M., Clark, C. A., Chevalier, N., & Espy, K. A. (2011). The structure of executive function in 3-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(3), 436-452.
doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.008 URL |
[61] | Wu, H. Z., & Wang, M. Y. (2015). The Developmental Characteristics of Executive Functions and the Influence of Verbal Ability on Children Aged 2 to 3. 5 Years Old. Psychological Development and Education, 31(6), 654-660. |
[ 吴慧中, 王明怡. (2015). 2-3.5岁岁儿童执行功能发展特点及其言语能力的影响. 心理发展与教育, 31(6), 654-660.] | |
[62] | Zelazo, P. D. (2013). Developmental psychology:A new synthesis. In P. D. Zelazo (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of developmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 3-12). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. |
[1] | 庞超, 陈颜璋, 王莉, 杨喜端, 贺雅, 李芷莹, 欧阳小钰, 傅世敏, 南威治. 客体信息在视觉工作记忆编码和维持阶段的不同注意选择模式[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(9): 1397-1410. |
[2] | 李海峰, 林世卿, 万博温. 价值导向的注意刷新及其机制[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(8): 1234-1242. |
[3] | 高玉林, 唐晓雨, 刘思宇, 王爱君, 张明. 内源性空间线索有效性对老年人视听觉整合的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(5): 671-684. |
[4] | 祝孝亮, 赵鑫. 执行功能在不同年级儿童数学能力中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(5): 696-710. |
[5] | 卓利楠, 曾祥玉, 吴冰, 牛荣荣, 于萍, 王玮文. 内侧前额皮层−伏隔核环路在决策冲动中的作用:基于动物模型的研究[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(4): 556-571. |
[6] | 尹华站, 张丽, 刘鹏玉, 李丹. 负性情绪的动机维度对时距知觉的影响:注意控制和注意偏向的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(12): 1917-1931. |
[7] | 张航, 王婷, 冯晓慧, 韦义平, 张积家. 铜鼓经验对壮族鼓手的节奏知觉和执行功能的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(11): 1762-1779. |
[8] | 陈悦源, 方卫宁, 郭北苑, 鲍海峰. 作业中断对任务绩效的影响及心理疲劳的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 22-35. |
[9] | 孙博, 曾宪卿, 许恺煜, 谢韵婷, 傅世敏. 情绪面孔的意识神经相关物及其无意识自动加工:来自事件相关电位的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(8): 867-880. |
[10] | 彭宇彬, 宛小昂. 视觉搜索中风味引发对关联颜色的注意偏向[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(7): 736-747. |
[11] | 闫驰, 高云飞, 胡赛赛, 宋方兴, 王勇慧, 赵晶晶. 目光注视线索对客体注意的影响及作用机制[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(7): 748-760. |
[12] | 周子暖, 陈颜璋, 傅世敏. 预期对注意的影响受制于被预期主体是目标还是分心物[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(3): 221-235. |
[13] | 郑思琦, 孟迎芳, 黄发杰. 目标决策还是动作诱发?动作反应对注意促进效应的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(11): 1325-1339. |
[14] | 李婉悦, 刘燊, 韩尚锋, 张林, 徐强. 特质焦虑在面部表情前注意加工阶段的影响:来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(1): 1-11. |
[15] | 张妮, 刘文, 刘方, 郭鑫. 8~12岁儿童抑郁与认知重评的关系:悲伤面孔注意偏向的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(1): 25-39. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||