心理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2): 154-167.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00154
收稿日期:
2021-03-17
发布日期:
2021-12-24
出版日期:
2022-02-25
通讯作者:
陈文锋
E-mail:wchen@ruc.edu.cn
基金资助:
WANG Dan, WANG Dianhui, CHEN Wenfeng()
Received:
2021-03-17
Online:
2021-12-24
Published:
2022-02-25
Contact:
CHEN Wenfeng
E-mail:wchen@ruc.edu.cn
摘要:
恶意创造力因其独特的“危害性”而与一般创造力有所区分。积极的人格特质如心理韧性由于可以促进一般创造力但对恶意有所抑制, 故其对恶意创造力的影响尚不清楚。通过2个研究考察心理韧性与恶意创造力的关系及其作用机制, 以及心理韧性与应激对恶意创造力的共同作用。结果表明:心理韧性水平能够显著负向预测青少年的恶意创造性行为, 且主要通过积极应对方式对恶意创造性行为起作用; 心理韧性对恶意创造性行为的影响也会受到应激环境的调节, 即相对于非应激条件, 应激条件下削弱了积极应对方式对恶意创造性行为的抑制作用。这些结果表明有必要注重培养青少年的心理韧性以抵御外界环境的不良影响, 并正确引导其创造力的发展。
中图分类号:
王丹, 王典慧, 陈文锋. (2022). 青少年心理韧性与恶意创造性行为倾向的关系. 心理学报, 54(2), 154-167.
WANG Dan, WANG Dianhui, CHEN Wenfeng. (2022). The relationship between adolescents’ resilience and their malevolent creative behaviors. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(2), 154-167.
变量 | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 心理韧性 | 57.60 | 14.41 | 1 | |||
2. 积极应对方式 | 22.05 | 5.88 | 0.85*** | 1 | ||
3. 消极应对方式 | 9.44 | 3.59 | -0.82*** | -0.78** | 1 | |
4. 恶意创造性行为 | 12.08 | 4.14 | -0.64*** | -0.65*** | 0.63*** | 1 |
表1 心理韧性、应对方式和恶意创造性行为的相关矩阵
变量 | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 心理韧性 | 57.60 | 14.41 | 1 | |||
2. 积极应对方式 | 22.05 | 5.88 | 0.85*** | 1 | ||
3. 消极应对方式 | 9.44 | 3.59 | -0.82*** | -0.78** | 1 | |
4. 恶意创造性行为 | 12.08 | 4.14 | -0.64*** | -0.65*** | 0.63*** | 1 |
回归方程 | 整体拟合指数 | 回归系数显著性 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
结果变量 | 预测变量 | R | R2 | F | β | t |
积极应对 | 0.86 | 0.74 | 342.02 | |||
性别 | 0.11 | 4.16*** | ||||
年龄 | -0.02 | -0.90 | ||||
心理韧性 | 0.84 | 30.72*** | ||||
消极应对 | 0.82 | 0.68 | 251.99 | |||
性别 | -0.15 | 0.22 | ||||
年龄 | 0.05 | 0.70 | ||||
心理韧性 | -0.21 | -26.97*** | ||||
恶意创造力 | 0.73 | 0.53 | 79.57 | |||
性别 | 0.05 | 1.44 | ||||
年龄 | -0.02 | -0.58 | ||||
心理韧性 | -0.20 | -2.69 | ||||
积极应对 | -0.56 | -7.90*** | ||||
消极应对 | 0.17 | 0.08* |
表2 变量间的回归分析
回归方程 | 整体拟合指数 | 回归系数显著性 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
结果变量 | 预测变量 | R | R2 | F | β | t |
积极应对 | 0.86 | 0.74 | 342.02 | |||
性别 | 0.11 | 4.16*** | ||||
年龄 | -0.02 | -0.90 | ||||
心理韧性 | 0.84 | 30.72*** | ||||
消极应对 | 0.82 | 0.68 | 251.99 | |||
性别 | -0.15 | 0.22 | ||||
年龄 | 0.05 | 0.70 | ||||
心理韧性 | -0.21 | -26.97*** | ||||
恶意创造力 | 0.73 | 0.53 | 79.57 | |||
性别 | 0.05 | 1.44 | ||||
年龄 | -0.02 | -0.58 | ||||
心理韧性 | -0.20 | -2.69 | ||||
积极应对 | -0.56 | -7.90*** | ||||
消极应对 | 0.17 | 0.08* |
变量 | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 心理韧性 | 58.86 | 14.98 | 1 | |||
2. 积极应对方式 | 22.45 | 5.92 | 0.85** | 1 | ||
3. 消极应对方式 | 9.16 | 3.40 | -0.79** | -0.75** | 1 | |
4. 恶意创造性行为 | 11.80 | 3.50 | -0.62** | -0.55** | 0.48** | 1 |
表3 心理韧性、应对方式和恶意创造性行为的相关矩阵
变量 | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 心理韧性 | 58.86 | 14.98 | 1 | |||
2. 积极应对方式 | 22.45 | 5.92 | 0.85** | 1 | ||
3. 消极应对方式 | 9.16 | 3.40 | -0.79** | -0.75** | 1 | |
4. 恶意创造性行为 | 11.80 | 3.50 | -0.62** | -0.55** | 0.48** | 1 |
变量 | 非应激组 | 应激组 | |
---|---|---|---|
前测 | 后测 | ||
抑郁 | 3.51 ± 2.41 | 3.51 ± 2.29 | 4.82 ± 2.90 |
焦虑 | 3.98 ± 2.41 | 4.02 ± 2.55 | 6.13 ± 3.12 |
压力 | 5.72 ± 2.70 | 5.71 ± 2.62 | 7.59 ± 2.84 |
表4 非应激组及应激组前后测抑郁、焦虑和压力的均值和标准差(M ± SD)
变量 | 非应激组 | 应激组 | |
---|---|---|---|
前测 | 后测 | ||
抑郁 | 3.51 ± 2.41 | 3.51 ± 2.29 | 4.82 ± 2.90 |
焦虑 | 3.98 ± 2.41 | 4.02 ± 2.55 | 6.13 ± 3.12 |
压力 | 5.72 ± 2.70 | 5.71 ± 2.62 | 7.59 ± 2.84 |
回归方程 | 整体拟合指数 | 回归系数 显著性 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
结果变量 | 预测变量 | R | R2 | F | β | t |
积极应对方式 | 0.86 | 0.73 | 329.87 | |||
性别 | 0.87** | 3.46 | ||||
年龄 | -0.06 | -0.77 | ||||
心理韧性 | 0.34** | 38.93*** | ||||
应激 | -0.09 | -0.37 | ||||
心理韧性×应激 | -0.02 | -1.32 | ||||
消极应对方式 | 0.81 | 0.66 | 233.03 | |||
性别 | -0.13 | 0.77 | ||||
年龄 | -0.01 | -0.04 | ||||
心理韧性 | -0.20 | -33.31*** | ||||
应激 | 0.12 | 0.69 | ||||
心理韧性×应激 | 0.03 | 2.66** | ||||
恶意创造性行为 | 0.69 | 0.48 | 79.47 | |||
性别 | 0.07 | 0.26 | ||||
年龄 | -0.04 | -0.55 | ||||
心理韧性 | -0.09 | -5.45*** | ||||
积极应对 | -0.28 | -6.92*** | ||||
消极应对 | -0.14 | -0.56 | ||||
应激 | -0.13 | -0.51 | ||||
积极应对×应激 | 0.36 | 4.43** | ||||
消极应对×应激 | -0.10 | -0.87 |
表5 有调节的中介模型检验
回归方程 | 整体拟合指数 | 回归系数 显著性 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
结果变量 | 预测变量 | R | R2 | F | β | t |
积极应对方式 | 0.86 | 0.73 | 329.87 | |||
性别 | 0.87** | 3.46 | ||||
年龄 | -0.06 | -0.77 | ||||
心理韧性 | 0.34** | 38.93*** | ||||
应激 | -0.09 | -0.37 | ||||
心理韧性×应激 | -0.02 | -1.32 | ||||
消极应对方式 | 0.81 | 0.66 | 233.03 | |||
性别 | -0.13 | 0.77 | ||||
年龄 | -0.01 | -0.04 | ||||
心理韧性 | -0.20 | -33.31*** | ||||
应激 | 0.12 | 0.69 | ||||
心理韧性×应激 | 0.03 | 2.66** | ||||
恶意创造性行为 | 0.69 | 0.48 | 79.47 | |||
性别 | 0.07 | 0.26 | ||||
年龄 | -0.04 | -0.55 | ||||
心理韧性 | -0.09 | -5.45*** | ||||
积极应对 | -0.28 | -6.92*** | ||||
消极应对 | -0.14 | -0.56 | ||||
应激 | -0.13 | -0.51 | ||||
积极应对×应激 | 0.36 | 4.43** | ||||
消极应对×应激 | -0.10 | -0.87 |
[1] |
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 27-51.
doi: 10.1146/psych.2002.53.issue-1 URL |
[2] |
Arnsten, A. F. (2009). Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 10(6), 410-422.
doi: 10.1038/nrn2648 pmid: 19455173 |
[3] |
Baas, M., Roskes, M., Koch, S., Cheng, Y., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2019). Why social threat motivates malevolent creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(11), 1590-1602.
doi: 10.1177/0146167219838551 URL |
[4] |
Bonetto, E., Pichot, N., Pavani, J.-B., & Adam-Troïan, J. (2020). Creative individuals are social risk-takers: Relationships between creativity, social risk-taking and fear of negative evaluations. Creativity. Theories - Research - Applications, 7(2), 309-320.
doi: 10.2478/ctra-2020-0016 URL |
[5] |
Byron, K., Khazanchi, S., & Nazarian, D. (2010). The relationship between stressors and creativity: A meta-analysis examining competing theoretical models. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 201-212.
doi: 10.1037/a0017868 URL |
[6] |
Campbell-Sills, L., Cohan, S. L., & Stein, M. B. (2006). Relationship of resilience to personality, coping, and psychiatric symptoms in young adults. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(4), 585-599.
pmid: 15998508 |
[7] |
Cheng, R., Lu, K. L., & Hao, N. (2021). The effect of anger on malevolent creativity and strategies for its emotion regulation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(8), 847-860.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00847 URL |
[ 程瑞, 卢克龙, 郝宁. (2021). 愤怒情绪对恶意创造力的影响及调节策略. 心理学报, 53(8), 847-860.] | |
[8] |
Clark, K., & James, K. (1999). Justice and positive and negative creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 311-320.
doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1204_9 URL |
[9] | Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Runco, M. A. (Eds.). (2010). The dark side of creativity. Cambridge university press. |
[10] |
Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 105-115.
doi: 10.1080/10400410802059424 URL |
[11] | Duan, H., Wang, X., Hu, W., & Kounios, J. (2019). Effects of acute stress on divergent and convergent problem-solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 26(1), 68-86. |
[12] |
Forgeard, M. J. C. (2013). Perceiving benefits after adversity: The relationship between self-reported posttraumatic growth and creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 245-264.
doi: 10.1037/a0031223 URL |
[13] |
Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300-319.
pmid: 21850154 |
[14] |
Fumagalli, M., & Priori, A. (2012). Functional and clinical neuroanatomy of morality. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 135(7), 2006-2021.
doi: 10.1093/brain/awr334 URL |
[15] |
Genet, J. J., & Siemer, M. (2011). Flexible control in processing affective and non-affective material predicts individual differences in trait resilience. Cognition and Emotion, 25(2), 380-388.
doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.491647 URL |
[16] |
Gill, P., Horgan, J., Hunter, S. T., & Cushenbery, L. D. (2013). Malevolent creativity in terrorist organizations. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(2), 125-151.
doi: 10.1002/jocb.28 URL |
[17] |
Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 102(3), 445-459.
doi: 10.1037/a0026406 URL |
[18] |
Gino, F., & Wiltermuth, S. S. (2014). Evil genius? How dishonesty can lead to greater creativity. Psychological Science, 25(4), 973-981.
doi: 10.1177/0956797614520714 URL |
[19] | Gong, Z., & Liu, C. (2016). Malevolent creativity: Concept, measurement, influence factors and future research. Journal of Psychological Science, 39(1), 63-68. |
[ 贡喆, 刘昌. (2016). 恶意创造力: 概念、测量方法、影响因素以及研究展望. 心理科学, 39(1), 63-68.] | |
[20] | Hao, N., Tang, M., Yang, J., Wang, Q., & Runco, M. A. (2016). A new tool to measure malevolent creativity: The malevolent creativity behavior scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 682. |
[21] |
Harris, D. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2015). Fast and furious: The influence of implicit aggression, premeditation, and provoking situations on malevolent creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9( 1), 54-64.
doi: 10.1037/a0038499 URL |
[22] | Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press. |
[23] |
Herrman, H., Stewart, D. E., Diaz-Granados, N., Berger, E. L., Jackson, B., & Yuen, T. (2011). What is resilience? The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56(5), 258-265.
doi: 10.1177/070674371105600504 URL |
[24] |
Hildebrandt, L. K., McCall, C., Engen, H. G., & Singer, T. (2016). Cognitive flexibility, heart rate variability, and resilience predict fine-grained regulation of arousal during prolonged threat. Psychophysiology, 53(6), 880-890.
doi: 10.1111/psyp.12632 pmid: 26899260 |
[25] | Hook, J. N., Smith, C. A., & Valentiner, D. P. (2008). A short-form of the Personal Report of Confidence as a Speaker. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(6), 1306-1313. |
[26] |
Hsu, Y. (2019). Advanced understanding of imagination as the mediator between five-factor model and creativity. The Journal of Psychology, 153(3), 307-326.
doi: 10.1080/00223980.2018.1521365 URL |
[27] |
Hunter, A. J., & Chandler, G. E. (1999). Adolescent resilience. IMAGE: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 31(3), 243-247.
doi: 10.1111/jnu.1999.31.issue-3 URL |
[28] |
Ionescu, T. (2012). Exploring the nature of cognitive flexibility. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 190-200.
doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.11.001 URL |
[29] |
Isen, A. M., Johnson, M. M., Mertz, E., & Robinson, G. F. (1985). The influence of positive affect on the unusualness of word associations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1413.
pmid: 4020605 |
[30] |
Jenkins, A. (2005). Creativity and resilience in the african american experience. The Humanistic Psychologist, 33(1), 25-32.
doi: 10.1207/s15473333thp3301_3 URL |
[31] |
Jiang, C., & Rau, P. P. (2017). The detrimental effect of acute stress on response inhibition when exposed to acute stress: An event-related potential analysis. Neuroreport, 28(14), 922-928.
doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000859 URL |
[32] |
Jia, X., Wang, Q., & Lin, L. (2020). The relationship between childhood neglect and malevolent creativity: The mediating effect of the dark triad personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 613695.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613695 URL |
[33] | Jin, X., Xiong, M., & Wang, H. L. (2016). The Relationship between replying style and guizhou province rural high school students' resilience. China Journal of Health Psychology, 24(9), 1413-1418. |
[ 金雪, 熊敏, 王洪礼. (2016). 贵州农村高中生应对方式与心理韧性的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志, 24(9), 1413-1418.] | |
[34] |
Käckenmester, W., Bott, A., & Wacker, J. (2019). Openness to experience predicts dopamine effects on divergent thinking. Personality Neuroscience, 2, e3.
doi: 10.1017/pen.2019.3 URL |
[35] |
Kinsley, C. H., Bales, K. L., Bardi, M., & Stolzenberg, D. S. (2015). Reproductive experiential regulation of cognitive and emotional resilience. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 58, 92-106.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.05.015 pmid: 26092267 |
[36] |
Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K. M., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1993). The ‘Trier Social Stress Test’ - A tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology, 28(1-2), 76-81.
doi: 10.1159/000118991 URL |
[37] |
Knight, B. G., Maines, M. L., & Robinson, G. S. (2002). The effects of sad mood on memory in older adults: A test of the mood congruence effect. Psychology and Aging, 17(4), 653.
pmid: 12507361 |
[38] | Kumpfer, K. L. (2002). Factors and processes contributing to resilience. In Resilience and Development (pp. 179-224). Springer, Boston, MA. |
[39] |
Lee, S. A., & Dow, G. T. (2011). Malevolent creativity: Does personality influence malicious divergent thinking? Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 73-82.
doi: 10.1080/10400419.2011.571179 URL |
[40] | Liang, Y. M., & Liu, Z. K. (2017). Resilience moderating the relationship between trauma and creativity [Abstract]. In Chinese Psychological Society (Ed.), The 20th National Psychology Conference - Abstracts of Psychology and National Mental Health (pp.924-925). |
[ 梁一鸣, 刘正奎. (2017). 心理韧性在创伤程度对创造力影响中的调节作用. 见: 中国心理学会(编). 第二十届全国心理学学术会议--心理学与国民心理健康摘要集(pp.924-925).] | |
[41] | Li, C. N., Sun, C. C., Xu, E. Z., Gu, J. J., & Zhang, Q. Y. (2017). The influence of coping strategies and pressure on social adjustment in secondary school students: Longitudinal mediation models. Psychological Development and Education, 33(2), 172-182. |
[ 李彩娜, 孙翠翠, 徐恩镇, 顾娇娇, 张庆垚. (2017). 初中生应对方式、压力对社会适应的影响:纵向中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 33(2), 172-182.] | |
[42] |
Liston, C., McEwen, B. S., & Casey, B. J. (2009). Psychosocial stress reversibly disrupts prefrontal processing and attentional control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(3), 912-917.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807041106 URL |
[43] |
Liu, X., Liao, H., Derfler-Rozin, R., Zheng, X., Wee, E. X. M., & Qiu, F. (2020). In line and out of the box: How ethical leaders help offset the negative effect of morality on creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(12), 1447-1465.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000489 URL |
[44] |
Lovelace, J. B., & Hunter, S. T. (2013). Charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders’ influence on subordinate creative performance across the creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 25(1), 59-74.
doi: 10.1080/10400419.2013.752228 URL |
[45] | Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales (2nd. ed.). Sydney: Psychology Foundation. |
[46] | Luo, Y. J., Lin, W. J., Wu, J. H., & Qin, S. Z. (2013). Cognitive neuroscience of stress. Progress in Physiology, 44(5), 345-353. |
[ 罗跃嘉, 林婉君, 吴健辉, 秦绍正. (2013). 应激的认知神经科学研究. 生理科学进展, 44(5), 345-353.] | |
[47] |
Mai, K. M., Ellis, A. P. J., & Welsh, D. T. (2015). The gray side of creativity: Exploring the role of activation in the link between creative personality and unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 76-85.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.05.004 URL |
[48] |
Moll, J., & de Oliveira-Souza, R. (2007). Moral judgments, emotions and the utilitarian brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(8), 319-321.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.001 URL |
[49] | Moussa, M. T., Lovibond, P. F., & Laube, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the 21-item depression anxiety stress scales (DASS21). Sydney, NSW: Transcultural Mental Health Centre. Cumberland Hospital. |
[50] | Perchtold-Stefan, C. M., Fink, A., Rominger, C., & Papousek, I. (2020). Creative, antagonistic, and angry? Exploring the roots of malevolent creativity with a real world idea generation task. The Journal of Creative Behavior. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.484 |
[51] |
Petrou, P., van der Linden, D., & Salcescu, O. C. (2020). When breaking the rules relates to creativity: The role of creative problem-solving demands and organizational constraints. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 54(1), 184-195.
doi: 10.1002/jocb.v54.1 URL |
[52] | Qiao, X. N. (2019). Neural correlates of malevolent creativity (Unpublished master’s thesis). East China Normal University. |
[ 乔熙诺. (2019). 恶意创造力的神经基础初探 (硕士学位论文). 华东师范大学.] | |
[53] |
Ram, D., Chandran, S., Sadar, A., & Gowdappa, B. (2019). Correlation of cognitive resilience, cognitive flexibility and impulsivity in attempted suicide. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 41(4), 362-367.
doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_189_18 URL |
[54] | Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305-310. |
[55] |
Richardson, G. E. (2002). The metatheory of resilience and resiliency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 307-321.
pmid: 11836712 |
[56] |
Ritter, S. M., & Ferguson, S. (2017). Happy creativity: Listening to happy music facilitates divergent thinking. PLoS One, 12(9), e0182210.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182210 URL |
[57] |
Runco, M. A., Noble, E. P., Reiter-Palmon, R., Acar, S., Ritchie, T., & Yurkovich, J. M. (2011). The genetic basis of creativity and ideational fluency. Creativity Research Journal, 23(4), 376-380.
doi: 10.1080/10400419.2011.621859 URL |
[58] | Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 393-400. |
[59] |
Segerstrom, S. C., & Miller, G. E. (2004). Psychological stress and the human immune system: A meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry. Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 601-630.
pmid: 15250815 |
[60] |
Segovia, F., Moore, J. L., Linnville, S. E., Hoyt, R. E., & Hain, R. E. (2012). Optimism predicts resilience in repatriated prisoners of war: A 37-year longitudinal study. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 25(3), 330-336.
doi: 10.1002/jts.21691 URL |
[61] | Soltani, E., Shareh, H., Bahrainian, A., & Farmani, A. (2013). The mediating role of cognitive flexibility in correlation of coping styles and resilience with depression. Pajoohandeh Journal, 18(2), 88-96. |
[62] |
Starcke, K., Wiesen, C., Trotzke, P., & Brand, M. (2016). Effects of acute laboratory stress on executive functions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 461.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00461 pmid: 27065926 |
[63] | Tang, D., & Wen, Z. L. (2020). Statistical approaches for testing common method bias: Problems and suggestions. Journal of Psychological Science, 43(1), 215-223. |
[ 汤丹丹, 温忠麟. (2020). 共同方法偏差检验: 问题与建议. 心理科学, 43(1), 215-223.] | |
[64] |
Teichner, W. H., Arees, E., & Reilly, R. (1963). Noise and human performances: A psychophysiological approach. Ergonomics, 6(1), 83-97.
doi: 10.1080/00140136308930678 URL |
[65] | Weidong, J., Guangyao, L., Hua, T., Ruohong, C., & Qian, Y. (2013). 403-Relationship between resilience and social support, coping style of children in middle school. European Psychiatry, 28(S1), 1-1. |
[66] | Wo, J., Wang, Z., Liu, C., & Lin, C. (2009). Development of creativity: The evidence from Chinese adolescents. Journal of Psychological Science, 32(3), 535-539. |
[ 沃建中, 王烨晖, 刘彩梅, 林崇德. (2009). 青少年创造力的发展研究. 心理科学, 32(3), 535-539.] | |
[67] | Xie, Y. N. (1998). Reliability and validity of the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 6(2), 114-115. |
[ 解亚宁. (1998). 简易应对方式量表信度和效度的初步研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 6(2), 114-115.] | |
[68] |
Xiong, H. X., Zhang, J., Ye, B. J., Zhang, X., & Sun, P. Z. (2012). Common method variance effects and the models of statistical approaches for controlling It. Advances in Psychological Science, 20(5), 757-769.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2012.00757 URL |
[ 熊红星, 张璟, 叶宝娟, 郑雪, 孙配贞. (2012). 共同方法变异的影响及其统计控制途径的模型分析. 心理科学进展, 20(5), 757-769.] | |
[69] | Xu, W. W., Yang, G., Zhu, M. R., Chen, J. T., & Li, W. F. (2019). Effect of psychological resilience on creativity:The mediating role of cognitive flexibility. China Journal of Health Psychology, 27(12), 1885-1890. |
[ 许为卫, 杨光, 朱梦茹, 陈井婷, 李文福. (2019). 心理韧性与大学生创造性的关系--认知灵活性的中介作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 27(12), 1885-1890.] | |
[70] | Yu, X. N., & Zhang, J. X. (2007). A comparison between the Chinese Version of Ego-Resiliency Scale and Connor- Davidson Resilience Scale. Journal of Psychological Science, 30(5), 1169-1171. |
[ 于肖楠, 张建新. (2007). 自我韧性量表与Connor-Davidson韧性量表的应用比较. 心理科学, 30(5), 1169-1171.] | |
[71] | Zhang, F., Liu, Z., Ma, Z., & Hou, Q. (2016). Application of the short version of depression-anxiety-stress scale to stress assessment on students after earthquake. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science, 25(1), 82-85. |
[ 张芳, 刘正奎, 马珠江, 侯倩茜. (2016). 抑郁焦虑压力量表精简版在震后青少年应激评估中的应用. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 25(1), 82-85.] | |
[72] |
Zhu, L., Jenkins, A. C., Set, E., Scabini, D., Knight, R. T., Chiu, P. H., ... Hsu, M. (2014). Damage to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects tradeoffs between honesty and self-interest. Natural Neuroscience, 17(10), 1319-1321.
doi: 10.1038/nn.3798 URL |
[1] | 张玮玮, 陈逸群, 朱莉琪. “近朱者赤”:同伴捐赠决策信息对青少年亲社会行为的影响及公正世界信念的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(9): 1453-1464. |
[2] | 胡月琴, 王理中, 陈钢, 甘怡群. CSF3R和行动控制对应激与健康饮食关系的调节作用:应激影响健康行为的个体化模型的初步证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(9): 1489-1500. |
[3] | 李为, 边子茗, 陈曦梅, 王俊杰, 罗一君, 刘永, 宋诗情, 高笑, 陈红. 9~12岁儿童应激与额颞区的关联: 来自多模态脑影像的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(4): 572-587. |
[4] | 曹衍淼, 方惠慈, 朱欣悦, 纪林芹, 张文新. BDNF基因、同伴关系与青少年早期抑郁:基于动态发展视角[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(10): 1620-1636. |
[5] | 王霈珊, 古若雷, 张亮. 急性应激与风险倾向:兴奋易感性的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 45-54. |
[6] | 胡义秋, 曾子豪, 彭丽仪, 王宏才, 刘双金, 杨琴, 方晓义. 亲子关系和父母教育卷入对青少年抑郁、自伤和自杀意念的影响:挫败感和人生意义感的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 129-141. |
[7] | 侯晴晴, 郭明宇, 王玲晓, 吕辉, 常淑敏. 学校资源与早期青少年心理社会适应的关系:一项潜在转变分析[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(8): 917-930. |
[8] | 廖友国, 陈建文, 张妍, 彭聪. 儿童青少年同伴侵害与内化问题的双向关系: 纵向研究的元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(7): 828-849. |
[9] | 王文超, 原昊, 伍新春. 灾后中小学生创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症状的共存模式[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(12): 1503-1516. |
[10] | 梁一鸣, 杨璐溪, 席居哲, 刘正奎. 睡眠问题在创伤后应激障碍各症状间的独特作用:基于交叉滞后网络分析模型[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(10): 1206-1215. |
[11] | 赖丽足, 任志洪, 颜懿菲, 牛更枫, 赵春晓, 罗梅, 张琳. 共情的双刃剑效应:COVID-19心理热线咨询师的继发性创伤应激和替代性创伤后成长[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(9): 992-1002. |
[12] | 程瑞, 卢克龙, 郝宁. 愤怒情绪对恶意创造力的影响及调节策略[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(8): 847-860. |
[13] | 李俊娇, 陈伟, 胡琰健, 曹杨婧文, 郑希付. 预期错误与急性应激对不同强度恐惧记忆提取消退的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(6): 587-602. |
[14] | 黄垣成, 赵清玲, 李彩娜. 青少年早期抑郁和自伤的联合发展轨迹:人际因素的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 515-526. |
[15] | 何晓丽, 袁小龙, 胡铭, 周丽晨. 父母元情绪理念与青少年问题行为:迷走神经的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(8): 971-981. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||