心理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2): 122-140.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00122
收稿日期:
2021-03-22
发布日期:
2021-12-24
出版日期:
2022-02-25
通讯作者:
孙红月
E-mail:sunhy@shnu.edu.cn;sunhy1215@126.com
基金资助:
JIANG Yuanping1, JIANG Chengming2, HU Tianyi1, SUN Hongyue1()
Received:
2021-03-22
Online:
2021-12-24
Published:
2022-02-25
Contact:
SUN Hongyue
E-mail:sunhy@shnu.edu.cn;sunhy1215@126.com
摘要:
跨期决策的研究表明, 积极情绪和消极情绪状态下的跨期决策行为存在显著差异。本研究从单维占优模型的角度, 揭示情绪影响跨期决策的过程机制。实验1通过诱发被试的积极和消极情绪, 发现积极情绪下被试的时间折扣率更低, 有更强的选择延迟选项的倾向。实验2运用“模拟天平任务”测量了跨期决策时的维度间差异比较, 检验单维占优模型对情绪影响跨期决策的解释性。结果发现, 维度间差异比较在情绪对跨期决策的影响中起中介作用。实验3a和实验3b分别运用时间和金钱启动策略操纵维度间差异比较过程, 再次验证单维占优模型的解释作用。 结果发现, 情绪对跨期决策的效应随着时间和金钱的启动而消失, 进一步支持了维度间差异比较的中介作用。本研究从决策过程的角度, 揭示了情绪影响跨期决策的心理机制, 并进一步为单维占优模型对跨期决策行为的解释性增加了支持性证据。
中图分类号:
蒋元萍, 江程铭, 胡天翊, 孙红月. (2022). 情绪对跨期决策的影响:来自单维占优模型的解释. 心理学报, 54(2), 122-140.
JIANG Yuanping, JIANG Chengming, HU Tianyi, SUN Hongyue. (2022). Effects of emotion on intertemporal decision-making: Explanation from the single dimension priority model. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(2), 122-140.
延迟金额 | 延迟时间 | 情绪组别 | M | SD | N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
100元 | 10天 | 积极组 | 0.068 | 0.083 | 37 |
消极组 | 0.096 | 0.163 | 36 | ||
中性组 | 0.072 | 0.082 | 37 | ||
30天 | 积极组 | 0.032 | 0.050 | 37 | |
消极组 | 0.045 | 0.061 | 36 | ||
中性组 | 0.042 | 0.061 | 37 | ||
90天 | 积极组 | 0.014 | 0.018 | 37 | |
消极组 | 0.020 | 0.027 | 36 | ||
中性组 | 0.014 | 0.018 | 37 | ||
180天 | 积极组 | 0.008 | 0.009 | 37 | |
消极组 | 0.013 | 0.015 | 36 | ||
中性组 | 0.010 | 0.012 | 37 | ||
360天 | 积极组 | 0.005 | 0.007 | 37 | |
消极组 | 0.010 | 0.009 | 36 | ||
中性组 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 37 | ||
1000元 | 10天 | 积极组 | 0.064 | 0.148 | 37 |
消极组 | 0.343 | 0.333 | 36 | ||
中性组 | 0.075 | 0.085 | 37 | ||
30天 | 积极组 | 0.024 | 0.053 | 37 | |
消极组 | 0.088 | 0.112 | 36 | ||
中性组 | 0.030 | 0.037 | 37 | ||
90天 | 积极组 | 0.010 | 0.019 | 37 | |
消极组 | 0.032 | 0.037 | 36 | ||
中性组 | 0.010 | 0.013 | 37 | ||
180天 | 积极组 | 0.008 | 0.014 | 37 | |
消极组 | 0.016 | 0.018 | 36 | ||
中性组 | 0.007 | 0.009 | 37 | ||
360天 | 积极组 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 37 | |
消极组 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 36 | ||
中性组 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 37 |
表1 不同情绪组别、延迟金额和延迟时间下时间折扣率的描述统计(N = 110)
延迟金额 | 延迟时间 | 情绪组别 | M | SD | N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
100元 | 10天 | 积极组 | 0.068 | 0.083 | 37 |
消极组 | 0.096 | 0.163 | 36 | ||
中性组 | 0.072 | 0.082 | 37 | ||
30天 | 积极组 | 0.032 | 0.050 | 37 | |
消极组 | 0.045 | 0.061 | 36 | ||
中性组 | 0.042 | 0.061 | 37 | ||
90天 | 积极组 | 0.014 | 0.018 | 37 | |
消极组 | 0.020 | 0.027 | 36 | ||
中性组 | 0.014 | 0.018 | 37 | ||
180天 | 积极组 | 0.008 | 0.009 | 37 | |
消极组 | 0.013 | 0.015 | 36 | ||
中性组 | 0.010 | 0.012 | 37 | ||
360天 | 积极组 | 0.005 | 0.007 | 37 | |
消极组 | 0.010 | 0.009 | 36 | ||
中性组 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 37 | ||
1000元 | 10天 | 积极组 | 0.064 | 0.148 | 37 |
消极组 | 0.343 | 0.333 | 36 | ||
中性组 | 0.075 | 0.085 | 37 | ||
30天 | 积极组 | 0.024 | 0.053 | 37 | |
消极组 | 0.088 | 0.112 | 36 | ||
中性组 | 0.030 | 0.037 | 37 | ||
90天 | 积极组 | 0.010 | 0.019 | 37 | |
消极组 | 0.032 | 0.037 | 36 | ||
中性组 | 0.010 | 0.013 | 37 | ||
180天 | 积极组 | 0.008 | 0.014 | 37 | |
消极组 | 0.016 | 0.018 | 36 | ||
中性组 | 0.007 | 0.009 | 37 | ||
360天 | 积极组 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 37 | |
消极组 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 36 | ||
中性组 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 37 |
类型 | 题目 | |
---|---|---|
问题1:小金额即刻选项 | A 现在获得60元 | B 30天后获得100元 |
问题2:小金额非即刻选项 | A 8周后获得400元 | B 16周后获得600元 |
问题3:大金额非即刻选项 | A 2年后获得6600元 | B 4年后获得10000元 |
问题4:大金额即刻选项 | A 现在获得640元 | B 6个月后获得1000元 |
表2 跨期决策题目
类型 | 题目 | |
---|---|---|
问题1:小金额即刻选项 | A 现在获得60元 | B 30天后获得100元 |
问题2:小金额非即刻选项 | A 8周后获得400元 | B 16周后获得600元 |
问题3:大金额非即刻选项 | A 2年后获得6600元 | B 4年后获得10000元 |
问题4:大金额即刻选项 | A 现在获得640元 | B 6个月后获得1000元 |
图4 中介模型:a是X对M的作用, b是M对Y的作用, c是X对Y的总作用, c′是X对Y的直接作用。问题1:a1 = -0.40*, SE = 0.19、b1 = 0.90***, SE = 0.04、c1 = -0.37, SE = 0.19、c′1 = -0.01, SE = 0.09; 问题2:a2 = -0.46*, SE = 0.19、b2 = 0.88***, SE = 0.05、c2 = -0.49*, SE = 0.19、c′2 = -0.08, SE = 0.09; 问题3:a3 = -0.69***, SE = 0.19、b3 = 0.88***, SE = 0.04、c3 = -0.77***, SE = 0.18、c′3 = -0.16, SE = 0.09; 问题4:a4 = -0.67***, SE = 0.19、b4 = 0.92***, SE = 0.05、c4 = -0.53**, SE = 0.19、c′4 = 0.09, SE = 0.09 注:*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, 下同。
预测变量 | 结果变量:跨期选择偏好 | 结果变量:维度间差异比较 | 结果变量:跨期选择偏好 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | t | β | SE | t | β | SE | t | ||
问题1 | 性别 | -0.07 | 0.21 | -0.72 | -0.11 | 0.20 | -0.56 | -0.05 | 0.12 | -0.42 |
年龄 | 0.22 | 0.07 | 2.22* | 0.10 | 0.07 | 1.51 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.63 | |
情绪效价 | -0.13 | 0.20 | -1.33 | -0.91 | 0.28 | -3.21** | -0.12 | 0.12 | -1.07 | |
时间启动 | -2.12 | 0.58 | -3.66*** | |||||||
情绪效价×时间启动 | 1.26 | 0.37 | 3.42*** | |||||||
维度间差异比较 | 0.81 | 0.06 | 13.83*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.08 | 0.18 | 0.68 | |||||||
F | 2.81* | 4.26** | 53.86*** | |||||||
问题2 | 性别 | -0.07 | 0.21 | -0.67 | -0.20 | 0.20 | -1.01 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.07 |
年龄 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 1.07 | -0.09 | 0.07 | -1.33 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 1.31 | |
情绪效价 | -0.22 | 0.20 | -2.25* | -0.88 | 0.28 | -3.17** | -0.12 | 0.12 | -1.05 | |
时间启动 | -1.94 | 0.57 | -3.39** | |||||||
情绪效价×时间启动 | 0.80 | 0.36 | 2.20* | |||||||
维度间差异比较 | 0.80 | 0.06 | 13.87*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.07 | 0.20 | 0.68 | |||||||
F | 2.59 | 5.10*** | 53.76*** | |||||||
问题3 | 性别 | 0.01 | 0.20 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.27 | -0.03 | 0.12 | -0.22 |
年龄 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 2.67** | 0.09 | 0.06 | 1.48 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.84 | |
情绪效价 | -0.32 | 0.18 | -3.53** | -1.13 | 0.27 | -4.27*** | -0.23 | 0.12 | -1.89 | |
时间启动 | -1.93 | 0.54 | -3.56*** | |||||||
情绪效价×时间启动 | 0.99 | 0.35 | 2.88** | |||||||
维度间差异比较 | 0.76 | 0.06 | 12.30*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.20 | 0.28 | 0.68 | |||||||
F | 8.36*** | 7.60*** | 53.41*** | |||||||
问题4 | 性别 | -0.01 | 0.20 | -0.07 | -0.29 | 0.19 | -1.58 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 1.64 |
年龄 | 0.23 | 0.06 | 2.36* | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.56 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 1.56 | |
情绪效价 | -0.28 | 0.19 | -2.99** | -1.33 | 0.26 | -5.03*** | -0.16 | 0.12 | -1.31 | |
时间启动 | -2.48 | 0.54 | -4.58*** | |||||||
情绪效价×时间启动 | 1.37 | 0.34 | 3.97*** | |||||||
维度间差异比较 | 0.76 | 0.06 | 12.02*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.16 | 0.28 | 0.65 | |||||||
F | 6.16** | 7.86*** | 47.32*** |
表3 情绪效价对跨期选择偏好的有调节的中介效应检验
预测变量 | 结果变量:跨期选择偏好 | 结果变量:维度间差异比较 | 结果变量:跨期选择偏好 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | t | β | SE | t | β | SE | t | ||
问题1 | 性别 | -0.07 | 0.21 | -0.72 | -0.11 | 0.20 | -0.56 | -0.05 | 0.12 | -0.42 |
年龄 | 0.22 | 0.07 | 2.22* | 0.10 | 0.07 | 1.51 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.63 | |
情绪效价 | -0.13 | 0.20 | -1.33 | -0.91 | 0.28 | -3.21** | -0.12 | 0.12 | -1.07 | |
时间启动 | -2.12 | 0.58 | -3.66*** | |||||||
情绪效价×时间启动 | 1.26 | 0.37 | 3.42*** | |||||||
维度间差异比较 | 0.81 | 0.06 | 13.83*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.08 | 0.18 | 0.68 | |||||||
F | 2.81* | 4.26** | 53.86*** | |||||||
问题2 | 性别 | -0.07 | 0.21 | -0.67 | -0.20 | 0.20 | -1.01 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.07 |
年龄 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 1.07 | -0.09 | 0.07 | -1.33 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 1.31 | |
情绪效价 | -0.22 | 0.20 | -2.25* | -0.88 | 0.28 | -3.17** | -0.12 | 0.12 | -1.05 | |
时间启动 | -1.94 | 0.57 | -3.39** | |||||||
情绪效价×时间启动 | 0.80 | 0.36 | 2.20* | |||||||
维度间差异比较 | 0.80 | 0.06 | 13.87*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.07 | 0.20 | 0.68 | |||||||
F | 2.59 | 5.10*** | 53.76*** | |||||||
问题3 | 性别 | 0.01 | 0.20 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.27 | -0.03 | 0.12 | -0.22 |
年龄 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 2.67** | 0.09 | 0.06 | 1.48 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.84 | |
情绪效价 | -0.32 | 0.18 | -3.53** | -1.13 | 0.27 | -4.27*** | -0.23 | 0.12 | -1.89 | |
时间启动 | -1.93 | 0.54 | -3.56*** | |||||||
情绪效价×时间启动 | 0.99 | 0.35 | 2.88** | |||||||
维度间差异比较 | 0.76 | 0.06 | 12.30*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.20 | 0.28 | 0.68 | |||||||
F | 8.36*** | 7.60*** | 53.41*** | |||||||
问题4 | 性别 | -0.01 | 0.20 | -0.07 | -0.29 | 0.19 | -1.58 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 1.64 |
年龄 | 0.23 | 0.06 | 2.36* | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.56 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 1.56 | |
情绪效价 | -0.28 | 0.19 | -2.99** | -1.33 | 0.26 | -5.03*** | -0.16 | 0.12 | -1.31 | |
时间启动 | -2.48 | 0.54 | -4.58*** | |||||||
情绪效价×时间启动 | 1.37 | 0.34 | 3.97*** | |||||||
维度间差异比较 | 0.76 | 0.06 | 12.02*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.16 | 0.28 | 0.65 | |||||||
F | 6.16** | 7.86*** | 47.32*** |
预测变量 | 结果变量:跨期选择偏好 | 结果变量:维度间差异比较 | 结果变量:跨期选择偏好 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | t | β | SE | t | β | SE | t | ||
问题1 | 性别 | -0.10 | 0.23 | -0.93 | -0.36 | 0.22 | -1.68 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.49 |
年龄 | -0.06 | 0.07 | -0.59 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 1.13 | -0.05 | 0.04 | -1.28 | |
情绪效价 | -0.10 | 0.21 | -0.98 | -0.58 | 0.29 | -2.02* | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.04 | |
金钱启动 | -0.21 | 0.59 | -0.35 | |||||||
情绪效价×金钱启动 | 0.57 | 0.38 | 1.51 | |||||||
维度间差异比较 | 0.83 | 0.06 | 14.35*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.68 | |||||||
F | 1.03 | 3.70** | 53.86*** | |||||||
问题2 | 性别 | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.67 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.88 | -0.05 | 0.13 | -0.38 |
年龄 | -0.03 | 0.07 | -0.23 | -0.04 | 0.07 | -0.58 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.73 | |
情绪效价 | -0.18 | 0.21 | -1.70 | -0.79 | 0.30 | -2.63* | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.39 | |
金钱启动 | -0.68 | 0.62 | -1.10 | |||||||
情绪效价×金钱启动 | 0.56 | 0.40 | 1.42 | |||||||
维度间差异比较 | 0.83 | 0.06 | 14.54*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.69 | |||||||
F | 0.99 | 1.65 | 55.14*** | |||||||
问题3 | 性别 | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.62 | -0.02 | 0.22 | -0.12 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.85 |
年龄 | 0.22 | 0.07 | 2.08* | 0.18 | 0.07 | 2.66 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.60 | |
情绪效价 | -0.05 | 0.20 | -0.48 | -0.69 | 0.28 | -2.45* | -0.07 | 0.09 | -0.82 | |
金钱启动 | -1.31 | 0.59 | -2.23* | |||||||
情绪效价×金钱启动 | 1.18 | 0.37 | 3.17** | |||||||
维度间差异比较 | 0.89 | 0.04 | 20.36*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.82 | |||||||
F | 2.26 | 4.25** | 112.22*** | |||||||
问题4 | 性别 | 0.09 | 0.23 | 0.87 | 0.16 | 0.23 | 0.69 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.06 |
年龄 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.81 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 1.19 | -0.02 | 0.03 | -0.63 | |
情绪效价 | -0.17 | 0.20 | -1.61 | -0.64 | 0.30 | -2.13* | -0.12 | 0.10 | -1.18 | |
金钱启动 | -1.06 | 0.62 | -1.71 | |||||||
情绪效价×金钱启动 | 0.71 | 0.39 | 1.81 | |||||||
维度间差异比较 | 0.87 | 0.05 | 17.67*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.77 | |||||||
F | 1.58 | 1.73 | 82.92*** |
表4 情绪效价对跨期选择偏好的有调节的中介效应检验
预测变量 | 结果变量:跨期选择偏好 | 结果变量:维度间差异比较 | 结果变量:跨期选择偏好 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | t | β | SE | t | β | SE | t | ||
问题1 | 性别 | -0.10 | 0.23 | -0.93 | -0.36 | 0.22 | -1.68 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.49 |
年龄 | -0.06 | 0.07 | -0.59 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 1.13 | -0.05 | 0.04 | -1.28 | |
情绪效价 | -0.10 | 0.21 | -0.98 | -0.58 | 0.29 | -2.02* | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.04 | |
金钱启动 | -0.21 | 0.59 | -0.35 | |||||||
情绪效价×金钱启动 | 0.57 | 0.38 | 1.51 | |||||||
维度间差异比较 | 0.83 | 0.06 | 14.35*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.68 | |||||||
F | 1.03 | 3.70** | 53.86*** | |||||||
问题2 | 性别 | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.67 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.88 | -0.05 | 0.13 | -0.38 |
年龄 | -0.03 | 0.07 | -0.23 | -0.04 | 0.07 | -0.58 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.73 | |
情绪效价 | -0.18 | 0.21 | -1.70 | -0.79 | 0.30 | -2.63* | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.39 | |
金钱启动 | -0.68 | 0.62 | -1.10 | |||||||
情绪效价×金钱启动 | 0.56 | 0.40 | 1.42 | |||||||
维度间差异比较 | 0.83 | 0.06 | 14.54*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.69 | |||||||
F | 0.99 | 1.65 | 55.14*** | |||||||
问题3 | 性别 | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.62 | -0.02 | 0.22 | -0.12 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.85 |
年龄 | 0.22 | 0.07 | 2.08* | 0.18 | 0.07 | 2.66 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.60 | |
情绪效价 | -0.05 | 0.20 | -0.48 | -0.69 | 0.28 | -2.45* | -0.07 | 0.09 | -0.82 | |
金钱启动 | -1.31 | 0.59 | -2.23* | |||||||
情绪效价×金钱启动 | 1.18 | 0.37 | 3.17** | |||||||
维度间差异比较 | 0.89 | 0.04 | 20.36*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.82 | |||||||
F | 2.26 | 4.25** | 112.22*** | |||||||
问题4 | 性别 | 0.09 | 0.23 | 0.87 | 0.16 | 0.23 | 0.69 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.06 |
年龄 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.81 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 1.19 | -0.02 | 0.03 | -0.63 | |
情绪效价 | -0.17 | 0.20 | -1.61 | -0.64 | 0.30 | -2.13* | -0.12 | 0.10 | -1.18 | |
金钱启动 | -1.06 | 0.62 | -1.71 | |||||||
情绪效价×金钱启动 | 0.71 | 0.39 | 1.81 | |||||||
维度间差异比较 | 0.87 | 0.05 | 17.67*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.77 | |||||||
F | 1.58 | 1.73 | 82.92*** |
[1] |
Aaker, J. L., Rudd, M., & Mogilner, C. (2011). If money does not make you happy, consider time. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(2), 126-130.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2011.01.004 URL |
[2] |
Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1974). Interference in memory for multiple contexts. Memory & Cognition, 2(3), 509-514.
doi: 10.3758/BF03196913 URL |
[3] |
Arieli, A., Ben-Ami, Y., & Rubinstein, A. (2011). Tracking decision makers under uncertainty. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3(4), 68-76.
doi: 10.1257/mic.3.4.68 URL |
[4] | Clore, G. L., Gasper, K., & Garvin, E. (2001). Affect as information. In Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition, (pp.121-144). |
[5] |
DeSteno, D., Li, Y., Dickens, L., & Lerner, J. S. (2014). Gratitude: A tool for reducing economic impatience. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1262-1267.
doi: 10.1177/0956797614529979 pmid: 24760144 |
[6] |
Duan, J. Y., Wu, S. J., & Sun, L. Y. (2017). Do the powerful discount the future less? The effects of power on temporal discounting. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1007.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01007 URL |
[7] |
Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49(8), 709-724.
pmid: 8092614 |
[8] |
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.
doi: 10.3758/BF03193146 URL |
[9] |
Forgas, J. P., & East, R. (2008). On being happy and gullible: Mood effects on skepticism and the detection of deception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1362-1367.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.010 URL |
[10] |
Forgas, J. P., & Moylan, S. (1987). After the movies: Transient mood and social judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13(4), 467-477.
doi: 10.1177/0146167287134004 URL |
[11] |
Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O'donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351-401.
doi: 10.1257/jel.40.2.351 URL |
[12] |
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226.
pmid: 11315248 |
[13] |
Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 351-367.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.351 URL |
[14] |
Gable, P., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2010). The motivational dimensional model of affect: Implications for breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorisation. Cognition and Emotion, 24(2), 322-337.
doi: 10.1080/02699930903378305 URL |
[15] | Guan, S., Cheng, L., Fan, Y., & Li, X. (2015). Myopic decisions under negative emotions correlate with altered time perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 468. |
[16] | Hardisty, D. J., Fox-Glassman, K., Krantz, D., & Weber, E. U. (2011). How to measure discount rates? An experimental comparison of three methods. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 8(3), 236-249. |
[17] | Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: Methodology in the social sciences. Guilford Press, Kindle Edition. |
[18] |
Huang, M. X., Lei, L., & Zhu, H. W. (2016). Money or romance: How should companies lead consumers in we-media sharing? Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48(2), 211-220.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00211 URL |
[ 黄敏学, 雷蕾, 朱华伟. (2016). 谈钱还是谈情: 企业如何引导消费者分享自媒体营销. 心理学报, 48(2), 211-220.] | |
[19] |
Ifcher, J., & Zarghamee, H. (2011). Happiness and time preference: The effect of positive affect in a random-assignment experiment. American Economic Review, 101(7), 3109-3129.
doi: 10.1257/aer.101.7.3109 URL |
[20] | Jiang, D. (2015). The strategies in intertemporal decision- making. (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Zhejiang University, China. |
[ 蒋多. (2015). 跨期决策策略研究 (博士学位论文). 浙江大学.] | |
[21] | Jiang, C. M., & Li, S. (2015). Mediation analysis and the application of bootstrap in mediation analysis. Psychological Exploration, 35(5), 458-463. |
[ 江程铭, 李纾. (2015). 中介分析和自举(Bootstrap)程序应用. 心理学探新, 35(5), 458-463.] | |
[22] |
Jiang, C. M., Liu, H. Z., Cai, X. H., & Li, S. (2016). A process test of priority models of intertemporal choice. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48(1), 59-72.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00059 URL |
[ 江程铭, 刘洪志, 蔡晓红, 李纾. (2016). 跨期选择单维占优模型的过程检验. 心理学报, 48(1), 59-72.] | |
[23] |
Kasser, T., & Sheldon, K. M. (2009). Time affluence as a path toward personal happiness and ethical business practice: Empirical evidence from four studies. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(2), 243-255.
doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9696-1 URL |
[24] |
Keren, G., & Roelofsma, P. (1995). Immediacy and certainty in intertemporal choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(3), 287-297.
doi: 10.1006/obhd.1995.1080 URL |
[25] |
Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (1999). Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(1), 78-87.
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.128.1.78 URL |
[26] |
Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (2), 443-478.
doi: 10.1162/003355397555253 URL |
[27] |
Lee, L., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2009). In search of homo economicus: Cognitive noise and the role of emotion in preference consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 173-187.
doi: 10.1086/597160 URL |
[28] |
Lee, L., Lee, M. P., Bertini, M., Zauberman, G., & Ariely, D. (2015). Money, time, and the stability of consumer preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(2), 184-199.
doi: 10.1509/jmr.10.0386 URL |
[29] |
Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146-159.
pmid: 11474720 |
[30] |
Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 799-823.
doi: 10.1146/psych.2015.66.issue-1 URL |
[31] |
Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., & Weber, E. U. (2013). The financial costs of sadness. Psychological Science, 24(1), 72-79.
doi: 10.1177/0956797612450302 URL |
[32] |
Li, A. M., Peng, Y., Li, B., & Ling, W. Q. (2014). The effects of money priming on pro-social behavior and its decision mechanism. Advances in Psychological Science, 22(5), 845-856.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00845 URL |
[ 李爱梅, 彭元, 李斌, 凌文辁. (2014). 金钱概念启动对亲社会行为的影响及其决策机制. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 845-856.] | |
[33] |
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5-18.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5 URL |
[34] |
Liu, H. Z., Jiang, C. M., Rao, L. L., & Li, S. (2015). Discounting or priority: Which rule dominates the intertemporal choice process? Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(4), 522-532.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00522 URL |
[ 刘洪志, 江程铭, 饶俪琳, 李纾. (2015). “时间折扣”还是 “单维占优”? --跨期决策的心理机制. 心理学报, 47(4), 522-532.] | |
[35] |
Liu, L., Feng, T. Y., Chen, J., & Li, H. (2013). The value of emotion: How does episodic prospection modulate delay discounting? PloS One, 8(11), e81717.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081717 URL |
[36] | Liu, L., Zhao, W. H., & Feng, T. Y. (2012). Cognitive and neural mechanisms of intertemporal choice. Journal of Psychological Science, 35(1), 56-61. |
[ 刘雷, 赵伟华, 冯廷勇. (2012). 跨期选择的认知机制与神经基础. 心理科学, 35(1), 56-61.] | |
[37] |
Liu, W., & Aaker, J. (2008). The happiness of giving: The time-ask effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 543-557.
doi: 10.1086/588699 URL |
[38] |
Li, X. M., & Xie, J. (2012). The influence mechanism of incidental emotions on choice deferral. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(12), 1641-1650.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.01641 URL |
[ 李晓明, 谢佳. (2012). 偶然情绪对延迟选择的影响机制. 心理学报, 44(12), 1641-1650.] | |
[39] |
Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 573-597.
doi: 10.2307/2118482 URL |
[40] |
Luo, S., Ainslie, G., & Monterosso, J. (2014). The behavioral and neural effect of emotional primes on intertemporal decisions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(3), 283-291.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nss132 URL |
[41] |
Mandel, N., & Johnson, E. J. (2002). When web pages influence choice: Effects of visual primes on experts and novices. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 235-245.
doi: 10.1086/341573 URL |
[42] |
Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106(1), 3-19.
pmid: 10197361 |
[43] |
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246-268.
pmid: 7740090 |
[44] |
Mogilner, C. (2010). The pursuit of happiness: Time, money, and social connection. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1348-1354.
doi: 10.1177/0956797610380696 pmid: 20732902 |
[45] |
Mogilner, C., & Aaker, J. (2009). “The time vs. money effect”: Shifting product attitudes and decisions through personal connection. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 277-291.
doi: 10.1086/597161 URL |
[46] |
Muraven, M., Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (1999). Longitudinal improvement of self-regulation through practice: Building self-control strength through repeated exercise. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139(4), 446-457.
doi: 10.1080/00224549909598404 URL |
[47] |
Pham, M. T., Cohen, J. B., Pracejus, J. W., & Hughes, G. D. (2001). Affect monitoring and the primacy of feelings in judgment. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(2), 167-188.
doi: 10.1086/322896 URL |
[48] |
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 URL |
[49] |
Pyone, J. S., & Isen, A. M. (2011). Positive affect, intertemporal choice, and levels of thinking: Increasing consumers' willingness to wait. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 532-543.
doi: 10.1509/jmkr.48.3.532 URL |
[50] |
Quoidbach, J., Dunn, E. W., Petrides, K. V., & Mikolajczak, M. (2010). Money giveth, money taketh away: The dual effect of wealth on happiness. Psychological Science, 21(6), 759-763.
doi: 10.1177/0956797610371963 pmid: 20483819 |
[51] |
Sagristano, M. D., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2002). Time- dependent gambling: Odds now, money later. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(3), 364-376.
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.131.3.364 URL |
[52] |
Samuelson, P. A. (1937). A note on measurement of utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 4(2), 155-161.
doi: 10.2307/2967612 URL |
[53] |
Scholten, M., & Read, D. (2010). The psychology of intertemporal tradeoffs. Psychological Review, 117(3), 925-944.
doi: 10.1037/a0019619 pmid: 20658858 |
[54] |
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513-523.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513 URL |
[55] | She, S. X., Chen, Y., Chen, J., & Yang, F. (2017). The effect of fear on intertemporal choice: An experiment based on recalling emotion. Psychological Exploration, 37(06), 543-548. |
[ 佘升翔, 陈阳, 陈璟, 杨帆. (2017). 恐惧对跨期选择的影响:基于回忆情绪的实验研究. 心理学探新, 37(06), 543-548.] | |
[56] | She, S. X., Zheng, X. W., Zhou, J., & Yang, S. S. (2016). Does fear increase impatience in inter-temporal choice? Evidence from an experiment. Psychological Exploration, 36(01), 25-30. |
[ 佘升翔, 郑小伟, 周劼, 杨姗姗. (2016). 恐惧降低跨期选择的耐心吗? --来自行为实验的证据. 心理学探新, 36(01), 25-30.] | |
[57] |
Song, Y. X., Cheng, Y. H., XieZhou, X. T., Gong, N. Y., & Liu, L. (2021). The influence of anger on delay discounting: The mediating role of certainty and control. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(05), 456-468.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00456 URL |
[ 宋锡妍, 程亚华, 谢周秀甜, 龚楠焰, 刘雷. (2021). 愤怒情绪对延迟折扣的影响:确定感和控制感的中介作用. 心理学报, 53(05), 456-468.] | |
[58] |
Su, L., & Gao, L. L. (2014). Strategy compatibility: The time versus money effect on product evaluation strategies. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 549-556.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2014.04.006 URL |
[59] |
Tice, D. M., Bratslavsky, E., & Baumeister, R. F. (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it!. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 53-67.
pmid: 11195891 |
[60] |
Tong, L. Q., Zheng, Y. H., & Zhao, P. (2013). Is money really the root of all evil? The impact of priming money on consumer choice. Marketing Letters, 24(2), 119-129.
doi: 10.1007/s11002-013-9224-7 URL |
[61] |
Trautmann, S. T., & van de Kuilen, G. (2012). Prospect theory or construal level theory?: Diminishing sensitivity vs. psychological distance in risky decisions. Acta psychologica, 139(1), 254-260.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.08.006 pmid: 22011526 |
[62] |
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403-421.
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403 URL |
[63] |
Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. Science, 314(5802), 1154-1156.
doi: 10.1126/science.1132491 URL |
[64] | Wang, P., & Liu, Y. F. (2009). The effect of mood on intertemporal choice. Psychological Ence, 32(6), 1318-1320. |
[ 王鹏, 刘永芳. (2009). 情绪对跨时选择的影响. 心理科学, 32(6), 1318-1320.] | |
[65] |
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
pmid: 3397865 |
[66] |
Wen, Z. L., & Ye, B. J. (2014). Different methods for testing moderated mediation models: Competitors or backups? Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(5), 714-726.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.00714 URL |
[ 温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 有调节的中介模型检验方法: 竞争还是替补?. 心理学报, 46(5), 714-726.] | |
[67] |
Winterich, K. P., Han, S., & Lerner, J. S. (2010). Now that I’m sad, it’s hard to be mad: The role of cognitive appraisals in emotional blunting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), 1467-1483.
doi: 10.1177/0146167210384710 pmid: 20876386 |
[68] | Yang, X. W., & He, G. B. (2015). Happiness makes people farsighted in intertemporal choice. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 21(3), 242-248. |
[ 杨鑫蔚, 何贵兵. (2015). 主观幸福感对跨期决策的影响. 应用心理学, 21(3), 242-248.] | |
[69] | Ye, Q. L. (2016). The Effect of power and hopefulness on intertemporal choice (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hunan Normal University, China. |
[ 叶秋伶. (2016). 权力和希望对跨期选择的影响 (硕士学位论文). 湖南师范大学.] | |
[70] | Zeelenberg, M., Nelissen, R. M. A., Breugelmans, S. M., & Pieters, R. (2008). On emotion specificity in decision making: Why feeling is for doing. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(1), 18-27. |
[71] | Zhang, W. D., Diao, J., & Schick, C. J. (2004). The cross- cultural measurement of positive and negative affect examining the dimensionality of PANAS. Journal of Psychological Science, (1), 77-79. |
[ 张卫东, 刁静, Schick, C. J. (2004). 正、负性情绪的跨文化心理测量:PANAS维度结构检验. 心理科学, (1), 77-79.] | |
[72] |
Zhou, R. R., & Pham, M. T. (2004). Promotion and prevention across mental accounts: When financial products dictate consumers& investment goals. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 125-135.
doi: 10.1086/383429 URL |
[73] | Zou, J. L., Zhang, X. C., Zhang, H., Yu, L., & Zhou, R. L. (2011). Beyond dichotomy of valence and arousal: Review of the motivational dimensional model of affect. Advances in Psychological Science, 19(9), 1339-1346. |
[ 邹吉林, 张小聪, 张环, 于靓, 周仁来. (2011). 超越效价和唤醒--情绪的动机维度模型述评. 心理科学进展, 19(9), 1339-1346.] |
[1] | 黄元娜, 江程铭, 刘洪志, 李纾. 风险、跨期和空间决策的决策策略共享:眼动和主观判断的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(6): 994-1015. |
[2] | 刘洪志, 杨钘兰, 李秋月, 魏子晗. 跨期决策中的维度差异偏好:眼动证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(4): 612-625. |
[3] | 陈晓宇, 杜媛媛, 刘强. 积极情绪提高背景线索学习的适应性[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(12): 1481-1490. |
[4] | 尹可丽, 兰淼森, 李慧, 赵子文. 仪式动作、象征意义和积极情绪增强控制感:双路径机制[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(1): 54-65. |
[5] | 佘卓霖, 李全, 杨百寅, 杨斌. 工作狂领导对团队绩效的双刃剑作用机制[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(9): 1018-1031. |
[6] | 宋锡妍, 程亚华, 谢周秀甜, 龚楠焰, 刘雷. 愤怒情绪对延迟折扣的影响:确定感和控制感的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 456-468. |
[7] | 杨伟文, 李超平. 资质过剩感对个体绩效的作用效果及机制:基于情绪-认知加工系统与文化情境的元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 527-554. |
[8] | 王盼盼, 何嘉梅. 情景预见对跨期决策的影响机制[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(1): 38-54. |
[9] | 周蕾, 李爱梅, 张磊, 李纾, 梁竹苑. 风险决策和跨期决策的过程比较:以确定效应和即刻效应为例[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(3): 337-352. |
[10] | 王鹏, 王晓田, 高娟, 黎夏岚, 徐静. 适应性时间管理:死亡意识对时间知觉和跨期决策的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(12): 1341-1350. |
[11] | 徐岚, 陈全, 崔楠, 陆凯丽. 享受当下, 还是留待未来?——时间观对跨期决策的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(1): 96-105. |
[12] | 李爱梅, 王海侠, 孙海龙, 熊冠星, 杨韶丽. “长计远虑”的助推效应:怀孕与环境跨期决策 *[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(8): 858-867. |
[13] | 李巧, 刘凤军. 模糊产品展示对产品态度的影响机制[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(3): 349-357. |
[14] | 邢淑芬, 李倩倩, 高鑫, 马园园, 傅锐. 不同睡眠时间参数对学前儿童执行功能的差异化影响[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(11): 1269-1281. |
[15] | 窦凯, 刘耀中, 王玉洁, 聂衍刚. “乐”于合作:感知社会善念诱导合作行为的情绪机制[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(1): 101-114. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||