心理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (11): 1288-1300.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.01288
任志洪1, 赵子仪1, 余香莲2, 赵春晓1, 张琳1, 林羽中3, 张微1()
收稿日期:
2019-12-03
发布日期:
2020-09-22
出版日期:
2020-11-25
通讯作者:
张微
E-mail:zhangwei2008@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
REN Zhihong1, ZHAO Ziyi1, YU Xianglian2, ZHAO Chunxiao1, ZHANG Lin1, LIN Yuzhong3, ZHANG Wei1()
Received:
2019-12-03
Online:
2020-09-22
Published:
2020-11-25
Contact:
ZHANG Wei
E-mail:zhangwei2008@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
摘要:
为考察睾酮素与反社会倾向未成年犯攻击行为的关系,在整合攻击行为生物激素视角和社会认知视角的基础上,探究敌意注意偏向的中介作用与皮质醇的调节作用。对84名未成年犯的激素水平、敌意注意偏向以及攻击行为进行调查。结果显示:(1)敌意注意偏向(注意不稳定性、注意回避)在睾酮素对攻击行为的影响中起完全中介作用;(2)皮质醇调节睾酮素与敌意注意偏向的关系,仅在高皮质醇水平下,敌意注意偏向的中介效应显著。基于生物激素影响攻击行为的中介机制和调节机制,可尝试从增加对敌意刺激的注意回避和提高皮质醇水平两个方面对反社会倾向未成年犯的攻击暴力行为进行干预。
中图分类号:
任志洪, 赵子仪, 余香莲, 赵春晓, 张琳, 林羽中, 张微. (2020). 睾酮素与反社会倾向未成年犯的攻击行为:敌意注意偏向的中介和皮质醇的调节作用. 心理学报, 52(11), 1288-1300.
REN Zhihong, ZHAO Ziyi, YU Xianglian, ZHAO Chunxiao, ZHANG Lin, LIN Yuzhong, ZHANG Wei. (2020). Testosterone and aggressive behavior in juvenile offenders with antisocial tendency: The mediation effect of hostile attention bias and the moderation effect of cortisol. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(11), 1288-1300.
变量 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 年龄 | - | ||||||||||||||||
2 受教育年限 | 0.03 | - | |||||||||||||||
3 睾酮素 | -0.15 | 0.14 | - | ||||||||||||||
4 皮质醇 | -0.02 | 0.04 | 0.41** | - | |||||||||||||
5 AQCV | 0.11 | -0.07 | 0.09 | 0.17 | - | ||||||||||||
6 AQCV-PA | 0.08 | -0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.85** | - | |||||||||||
7 AQCV-VA | 0.14 | -0.09 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.80** | 0.63** | - | ||||||||||
8 AQCV-A | 0.07 | -0.01 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.87** | 0.68** | 0.65** | - | |||||||||
9 AQCV-H | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.22 | 0.78** | 0.48** | 0.55** | 0.61** | - | ||||||||
10 AQCV-SA | 0.18 | -0.33** | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.66** | 0.41** | 0.44** | 0.47** | 0.47** | - | |||||||
11 Dot-BS | -0.04 | -0.20 | -0.01 | -0.10 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.02 | -0.02 | 0.04 | - | ||||||
12 Stroop-BS | -0.05 | -0.06 | 0.16 | -0.18 | -0.16 | -0.23* | -0.05 | -0.19 | -0.05 | -0.05 | -0.02 | - | |||||
13 M-pos | 0.02 | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.01 | -0.06 | -0.04 | -0.18 | -0.02 | 0.02 | -0.08 | 0.17 | 0.17 | - | ||||
14 M-neg | 0.07 | -0.19 | -0.23* | -0.08 | 0.23 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.27* | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.50** | -0.26* | -0.08 | - | |||
15 P-pos | -0.18 | 0.09 | 0.26* | 0.02 | -0.09 | -0.11 | -0.17 | -0.09 | 0.05 | -0.08 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.80** | -0.15 | - | ||
16 P-neg | 0.12 | -0.27* | -0.27* | -0.03 | 0.30** | 0.24* | 0.24* | 0.37** | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.47** | -0.23 | -0.05 | 0.85** | -0.20 | - | |
17 Variability | -0.29* | 0.20 | 0.41** | 0.11 | -0.23* | -0.28* | -0.12 | -0.29* | -0.01 | -0.17 | -0.21 | 0.31** | 0.31** | -0.63** | 0.60** | -0.74** | - |
M (SD) | 17.55 | 3.64 | 29.29 | 901.31 | 73.43 | 19.71 | 12.51 | 13.92 | 15.99 | 11.30 | -19.85 | 3.03 | 77.50 | -96.95 | 159.16 | -202.36 | 55.25 |
0.52 | 3.95 | 7.91 | 213.91 | 19.16 | 7.05 | 3.54 | 4.70 | 5.05 | 3.55 | 32.20 | 22.08 | 51.56 | 64.12 | 114.32 | 148.49 | 29.57 |
表1 研究变量的平均数(M)、标准差(SD)及相关系数
变量 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 年龄 | - | ||||||||||||||||
2 受教育年限 | 0.03 | - | |||||||||||||||
3 睾酮素 | -0.15 | 0.14 | - | ||||||||||||||
4 皮质醇 | -0.02 | 0.04 | 0.41** | - | |||||||||||||
5 AQCV | 0.11 | -0.07 | 0.09 | 0.17 | - | ||||||||||||
6 AQCV-PA | 0.08 | -0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.85** | - | |||||||||||
7 AQCV-VA | 0.14 | -0.09 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.80** | 0.63** | - | ||||||||||
8 AQCV-A | 0.07 | -0.01 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.87** | 0.68** | 0.65** | - | |||||||||
9 AQCV-H | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.22 | 0.78** | 0.48** | 0.55** | 0.61** | - | ||||||||
10 AQCV-SA | 0.18 | -0.33** | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.66** | 0.41** | 0.44** | 0.47** | 0.47** | - | |||||||
11 Dot-BS | -0.04 | -0.20 | -0.01 | -0.10 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.02 | -0.02 | 0.04 | - | ||||||
12 Stroop-BS | -0.05 | -0.06 | 0.16 | -0.18 | -0.16 | -0.23* | -0.05 | -0.19 | -0.05 | -0.05 | -0.02 | - | |||||
13 M-pos | 0.02 | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.01 | -0.06 | -0.04 | -0.18 | -0.02 | 0.02 | -0.08 | 0.17 | 0.17 | - | ||||
14 M-neg | 0.07 | -0.19 | -0.23* | -0.08 | 0.23 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.27* | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.50** | -0.26* | -0.08 | - | |||
15 P-pos | -0.18 | 0.09 | 0.26* | 0.02 | -0.09 | -0.11 | -0.17 | -0.09 | 0.05 | -0.08 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.80** | -0.15 | - | ||
16 P-neg | 0.12 | -0.27* | -0.27* | -0.03 | 0.30** | 0.24* | 0.24* | 0.37** | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.47** | -0.23 | -0.05 | 0.85** | -0.20 | - | |
17 Variability | -0.29* | 0.20 | 0.41** | 0.11 | -0.23* | -0.28* | -0.12 | -0.29* | -0.01 | -0.17 | -0.21 | 0.31** | 0.31** | -0.63** | 0.60** | -0.74** | - |
M (SD) | 17.55 | 3.64 | 29.29 | 901.31 | 73.43 | 19.71 | 12.51 | 13.92 | 15.99 | 11.30 | -19.85 | 3.03 | 77.50 | -96.95 | 159.16 | -202.36 | 55.25 |
0.52 | 3.95 | 7.91 | 213.91 | 19.16 | 7.05 | 3.54 | 4.70 | 5.05 | 3.55 | 32.20 | 22.08 | 51.56 | 64.12 | 114.32 | 148.49 | 29.57 |
预测变量 | 睾酮素对AQCV的预测作用: 注意偏向不稳定性的中介效应检验 | 睾酮素对AQCV-PA的预测作用: 注意偏向不稳定性的中介效应检验 | 睾酮素对AQCV-A的预测作用: 注意偏向不稳定性的中介效应检验 | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
因变量模型(因变量 = AQCV) | 因变量模型(因变量 = AQCV-PA) | 因变量模型(因变量 = AQCV-A) | |||||||||||||||||||
B | β | t | ΔR2 | B | β | t | ΔR2 | B | β | t | ΔR2 | ||||||||||
第一层 | 年龄 | 5.02 | 0.14 | 1.14 | 0.017 | 1.29 | 0.10 | 0.79 | 0.007 | 0.67 | 0.07 | 0.61 | 0.005 | ||||||||
受教育年限 | -0.41 | -0.08 | -0.70 | -0.08 | -0.05 | -0.38 | -0.03 | -0.02 | -0.20 | ||||||||||||
第二层 | 睾酮素 | 0.33 | 0.14 | 1.14 | 0.018 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.76 | 0.008 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.24 | 0.001 | ||||||||
中介变量模型 (因变量 = 注意不稳定性) | 中介变量模型 (因变量 = 注意不稳定性) | 中介变量模型 (因变量 = 注意不稳定性) | |||||||||||||||||||
B | β | t | ΔR2 | B | β | t | ΔR2 | B | β | t | ΔR2 | ||||||||||
第一层 | 年龄 | -14.52 | -0.26 | -2.44* | 0.131** | -14.52 | -0.26 | -2.44* | 0.131** | -14.52 | -0.26 | -2.44* | 0.131** | ||||||||
受教育年限 | 1.14 | 0.15 | 1.45 | 1.14 | 0.15 | 1.45 | 1.14 | 0.15 | 1.45 | ||||||||||||
第二层 | 睾酮素 | 1.28 | 0.34 | 3.24** | 0.113** | 1.28 | 0.34 | 3.24** | 0.113** | 1.28 | 0.34 | 3.24** | 0.113** | ||||||||
因变量模型(因变量 = AQCV) | 因变量模型(因变量 = AQCV-PA) | 因变量模型(因变量 = AQCV-A) | |||||||||||||||||||
B | β | t | ΔR2 | B | β | t | ΔR2 | B | β | t | ΔR2 | ||||||||||
第一层 | 年龄 | 2.24 | 0.06 | 0.50 | 0.017 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.007 | -0.21 | -0.02 | -0.19 | 0.005 | ||||||||
受教育年限 | -0.19 | -0.04 | -0.33 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.29 | ||||||||||||
第二层 | 睾酮素 | 0.58 | 0.24 | 1.90 | 0.083* | 0.19 | 0.21 | 1.70 | 0.100* | 0.10 | 0.16 | 1.28 | 0.108* | ||||||||
注意偏向 不稳定性 | -0.19 | -0.29 | -2.23* | -0.08 | -0.35 | -2.67** | -0.06 | -0.38 | -2.89** | ||||||||||||
注意不稳定性的中介效应分解表 | |||||||||||||||||||||
效应值 | Boot 标准误 | Boot 95% CI | 效应值 | Boot 标准误 | Boot 95% CI | 效应值 | Boot 标准误 | Boot 95% CI | |||||||||||||
直接效应 | 0.58 | 0.34 | [-0.11, 1.26] | 0.19 | 0.11 | [-0.04, 0.42] | 0.10 | 0.08 | [-0.60, 0.24] | ||||||||||||
中介效应 | -0.25 | 0.13 | [-0.56, -0.04] | -0.11 | 0.05 | [-0.24, -0.03] | -0.08 | 0.04 | [-0.16, -0.02] |
表2 睾酮素对攻击水平的预测作用:注意不稳定性的简单中介效应检验
预测变量 | 睾酮素对AQCV的预测作用: 注意偏向不稳定性的中介效应检验 | 睾酮素对AQCV-PA的预测作用: 注意偏向不稳定性的中介效应检验 | 睾酮素对AQCV-A的预测作用: 注意偏向不稳定性的中介效应检验 | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
因变量模型(因变量 = AQCV) | 因变量模型(因变量 = AQCV-PA) | 因变量模型(因变量 = AQCV-A) | |||||||||||||||||||
B | β | t | ΔR2 | B | β | t | ΔR2 | B | β | t | ΔR2 | ||||||||||
第一层 | 年龄 | 5.02 | 0.14 | 1.14 | 0.017 | 1.29 | 0.10 | 0.79 | 0.007 | 0.67 | 0.07 | 0.61 | 0.005 | ||||||||
受教育年限 | -0.41 | -0.08 | -0.70 | -0.08 | -0.05 | -0.38 | -0.03 | -0.02 | -0.20 | ||||||||||||
第二层 | 睾酮素 | 0.33 | 0.14 | 1.14 | 0.018 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.76 | 0.008 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.24 | 0.001 | ||||||||
中介变量模型 (因变量 = 注意不稳定性) | 中介变量模型 (因变量 = 注意不稳定性) | 中介变量模型 (因变量 = 注意不稳定性) | |||||||||||||||||||
B | β | t | ΔR2 | B | β | t | ΔR2 | B | β | t | ΔR2 | ||||||||||
第一层 | 年龄 | -14.52 | -0.26 | -2.44* | 0.131** | -14.52 | -0.26 | -2.44* | 0.131** | -14.52 | -0.26 | -2.44* | 0.131** | ||||||||
受教育年限 | 1.14 | 0.15 | 1.45 | 1.14 | 0.15 | 1.45 | 1.14 | 0.15 | 1.45 | ||||||||||||
第二层 | 睾酮素 | 1.28 | 0.34 | 3.24** | 0.113** | 1.28 | 0.34 | 3.24** | 0.113** | 1.28 | 0.34 | 3.24** | 0.113** | ||||||||
因变量模型(因变量 = AQCV) | 因变量模型(因变量 = AQCV-PA) | 因变量模型(因变量 = AQCV-A) | |||||||||||||||||||
B | β | t | ΔR2 | B | β | t | ΔR2 | B | β | t | ΔR2 | ||||||||||
第一层 | 年龄 | 2.24 | 0.06 | 0.50 | 0.017 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.007 | -0.21 | -0.02 | -0.19 | 0.005 | ||||||||
受教育年限 | -0.19 | -0.04 | -0.33 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.29 | ||||||||||||
第二层 | 睾酮素 | 0.58 | 0.24 | 1.90 | 0.083* | 0.19 | 0.21 | 1.70 | 0.100* | 0.10 | 0.16 | 1.28 | 0.108* | ||||||||
注意偏向 不稳定性 | -0.19 | -0.29 | -2.23* | -0.08 | -0.35 | -2.67** | -0.06 | -0.38 | -2.89** | ||||||||||||
注意不稳定性的中介效应分解表 | |||||||||||||||||||||
效应值 | Boot 标准误 | Boot 95% CI | 效应值 | Boot 标准误 | Boot 95% CI | 效应值 | Boot 标准误 | Boot 95% CI | |||||||||||||
直接效应 | 0.58 | 0.34 | [-0.11, 1.26] | 0.19 | 0.11 | [-0.04, 0.42] | 0.10 | 0.08 | [-0.60, 0.24] | ||||||||||||
中介效应 | -0.25 | 0.13 | [-0.56, -0.04] | -0.11 | 0.05 | [-0.24, -0.03] | -0.08 | 0.04 | [-0.16, -0.02] |
预测变量 | 睾酮素对AQCV的预测作用: 有调节的中介模型检验 | 睾酮素对AQCV-PA的预测作用: 有调节的中介模型检验 | 睾酮素对AQCV-A的预测作用: 有调节的中介模型检验 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
中介变量模型 (因变量 = 注意不稳定性) | 中介变量模型 (因变量 = 注意不稳定性) | 中介变量模型 (因变量 = 注意不稳定性) | |||||||||||||||||
B | β | t | ΔR2 | B | β | t | ΔR2 | B | β | t | ΔR2 | ||||||||
第一层 | 年龄 | -12.92 | -0.23 | -2.27* | 0.131** | -12.92 | -0.23 | -2.27* | 0.131** | -12.92 | -0.23 | -2.27* | 0.131** | ||||||
受教育年限 | 0.98 | 0.13 | 1.30 | 0.98 | 0.13 | 1.30 | 0.98 | 0.13 | 1.30 | ||||||||||
第二层 | 睾酮素 | 1.38 | 0.37 | 3.35** | 0.116** | 1.38 | 0.37 | 3.35** | 0.116** | 1.38 | 0.37 | 3.35** | 0.116** | ||||||
皮质醇 | -0.01 | -0.04 | -0.40 | -0.01 | -0.04 | -0.40 | -0.01 | -0.04 | -0.40 | ||||||||||
第三层 | 睾酮素×皮质醇 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3.00** | 0.088** | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3.00** | 0.088** | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3.00** | 0.088** | ||||||
因变量模型(因变量 = AQCV) | 因变量模型(因变量 = AQCV-PA) | 因变量模型(因变量 = AQCV-A) | |||||||||||||||||
B | β | t | ΔR2 | B | β | t | ΔR2 | B | β | t | ΔR2 | ||||||||
第一层 | 年龄 | 2.02 | 0.06 | 0.45 | 0.017 | 0.04 | 0.00 | .025 | 0.007 | -0.27 | -0.03 | -0.24 | 0.005 | ||||||
受教育年限 | -0.18 | -0.04 | -0.31 | 0.01 | 0.01 | .065 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.31 | ||||||||||
第二层 | 注意不稳定性 | -0.19 | -0.30 | -2.1* | 0.103 | -0.09 | -0.39 | -2.77** | 0.101 | -0.06 | -0.38 | -2.76** | 0.131* | ||||||
睾酮素 | 0.42 | 0.17 | 1.26 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 1.57 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.68 | ||||||||||
皮质醇 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 1.35 | ||||||||||
第三层 | 睾酮素×皮质醇 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.22 | 0.001 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.86 | 0.010 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.36 | 0.002 | ||||||
皮质醇 | 在皮质醇的不同水平上注意不稳定性的中介效应 | ||||||||||||||||||
效应值 | Boot 标准误 | Boot 95% CI | 效应值 | Boot 标准误 | Boot 95% CI | 效应值 | Boot 标准误 | Boot 95% CI | |||||||||||
687.40 (M - SD) | -0.07 | 0.13 | [-0.37, 0.13] | -0.03 | 0.05 | [-0.16, 0.05] | -0.02 | 0.03 | [-0.10, 0.04] | ||||||||||
901.31 (M) | -0.27 | 0.13 | [-0.61, -0.59] | -0.12 | 0.05 | [-0.25, -0.03] | -0.09 | 0.04 | [-0.18, -0.03] | ||||||||||
1115.22 (M + SD) | -0.47 | 0.22 | [-1.02, -0.12] | -0.21 | 0.08 | [-0.40, -0.07] | -0.15 | 0.06 | [-0.29, -0.05] |
表3 睾酮素对攻击水平的预测作用:有调节的中介效应检验
预测变量 | 睾酮素对AQCV的预测作用: 有调节的中介模型检验 | 睾酮素对AQCV-PA的预测作用: 有调节的中介模型检验 | 睾酮素对AQCV-A的预测作用: 有调节的中介模型检验 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
中介变量模型 (因变量 = 注意不稳定性) | 中介变量模型 (因变量 = 注意不稳定性) | 中介变量模型 (因变量 = 注意不稳定性) | |||||||||||||||||
B | β | t | ΔR2 | B | β | t | ΔR2 | B | β | t | ΔR2 | ||||||||
第一层 | 年龄 | -12.92 | -0.23 | -2.27* | 0.131** | -12.92 | -0.23 | -2.27* | 0.131** | -12.92 | -0.23 | -2.27* | 0.131** | ||||||
受教育年限 | 0.98 | 0.13 | 1.30 | 0.98 | 0.13 | 1.30 | 0.98 | 0.13 | 1.30 | ||||||||||
第二层 | 睾酮素 | 1.38 | 0.37 | 3.35** | 0.116** | 1.38 | 0.37 | 3.35** | 0.116** | 1.38 | 0.37 | 3.35** | 0.116** | ||||||
皮质醇 | -0.01 | -0.04 | -0.40 | -0.01 | -0.04 | -0.40 | -0.01 | -0.04 | -0.40 | ||||||||||
第三层 | 睾酮素×皮质醇 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3.00** | 0.088** | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3.00** | 0.088** | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3.00** | 0.088** | ||||||
因变量模型(因变量 = AQCV) | 因变量模型(因变量 = AQCV-PA) | 因变量模型(因变量 = AQCV-A) | |||||||||||||||||
B | β | t | ΔR2 | B | β | t | ΔR2 | B | β | t | ΔR2 | ||||||||
第一层 | 年龄 | 2.02 | 0.06 | 0.45 | 0.017 | 0.04 | 0.00 | .025 | 0.007 | -0.27 | -0.03 | -0.24 | 0.005 | ||||||
受教育年限 | -0.18 | -0.04 | -0.31 | 0.01 | 0.01 | .065 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.31 | ||||||||||
第二层 | 注意不稳定性 | -0.19 | -0.30 | -2.1* | 0.103 | -0.09 | -0.39 | -2.77** | 0.101 | -0.06 | -0.38 | -2.76** | 0.131* | ||||||
睾酮素 | 0.42 | 0.17 | 1.26 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 1.57 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.68 | ||||||||||
皮质醇 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 1.35 | ||||||||||
第三层 | 睾酮素×皮质醇 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.22 | 0.001 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.86 | 0.010 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.36 | 0.002 | ||||||
皮质醇 | 在皮质醇的不同水平上注意不稳定性的中介效应 | ||||||||||||||||||
效应值 | Boot 标准误 | Boot 95% CI | 效应值 | Boot 标准误 | Boot 95% CI | 效应值 | Boot 标准误 | Boot 95% CI | |||||||||||
687.40 (M - SD) | -0.07 | 0.13 | [-0.37, 0.13] | -0.03 | 0.05 | [-0.16, 0.05] | -0.02 | 0.03 | [-0.10, 0.04] | ||||||||||
901.31 (M) | -0.27 | 0.13 | [-0.61, -0.59] | -0.12 | 0.05 | [-0.25, -0.03] | -0.09 | 0.04 | [-0.18, -0.03] | ||||||||||
1115.22 (M + SD) | -0.47 | 0.22 | [-1.02, -0.12] | -0.21 | 0.08 | [-0.40, -0.07] | -0.15 | 0.06 | [-0.29, -0.05] |
预测变量 | 中介变量模型 (因变量 = 负向峰值TL-BS) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | β | t | ΔR2 | |||||
第一层 | 年龄 | 17.60 | 0.06 | 0.56 | 0.088* | |||
受教育年限 | -8.46 | -0.22 | -2.04* | |||||
第二层 | 睾酮素 | -4.88 | -0.26 | -2.13* | 0.053 | |||
皮质醇 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.60 | |||||
第三层 | 睾酮素×皮质醇 | -0.02 | -0.27 | -2.51* | 0.074** | |||
因变量模型(因变量 = AQCV-VA) | ||||||||
B | β | t | ΔR2 | |||||
第一层 | 年龄 | 1.10 | 0.17 | 1.40 | 0.034 | |||
受教育年限 | -0.02 | -0.03 | -0.22 | |||||
第二层 | 负向峰值TL-BS | 0.01 | 0.25 | 1.93 | 0.075 | |||
睾酮素 | 0.08 | 0.18 | 1.33 | |||||
皮质醇 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.14 | |||||
第三层 | 睾酮素×皮质醇 | 0.00 | -0.01 | -0.10 | 0.000 | |||
皮质醇 | 在皮质醇的不同水平上负向峰值 TL-BS的中介效应 | |||||||
效应值 | Boot标准误 | Boot 95% CI | ||||||
687.40 (M - SD) | -0.001 | 0.03 | [-0.06, 0.05] | |||||
901.31 (M) | -0.03 | 0.02 | [-0.08, -0.06] | |||||
1115.22 (M + SD) | -0.06 | 0.03 | [-0.14, -0.01] |
表4 睾酮素对言语攻击的预测作用:有调节的中介模型检验
预测变量 | 中介变量模型 (因变量 = 负向峰值TL-BS) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | β | t | ΔR2 | |||||
第一层 | 年龄 | 17.60 | 0.06 | 0.56 | 0.088* | |||
受教育年限 | -8.46 | -0.22 | -2.04* | |||||
第二层 | 睾酮素 | -4.88 | -0.26 | -2.13* | 0.053 | |||
皮质醇 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.60 | |||||
第三层 | 睾酮素×皮质醇 | -0.02 | -0.27 | -2.51* | 0.074** | |||
因变量模型(因变量 = AQCV-VA) | ||||||||
B | β | t | ΔR2 | |||||
第一层 | 年龄 | 1.10 | 0.17 | 1.40 | 0.034 | |||
受教育年限 | -0.02 | -0.03 | -0.22 | |||||
第二层 | 负向峰值TL-BS | 0.01 | 0.25 | 1.93 | 0.075 | |||
睾酮素 | 0.08 | 0.18 | 1.33 | |||||
皮质醇 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.14 | |||||
第三层 | 睾酮素×皮质醇 | 0.00 | -0.01 | -0.10 | 0.000 | |||
皮质醇 | 在皮质醇的不同水平上负向峰值 TL-BS的中介效应 | |||||||
效应值 | Boot标准误 | Boot 95% CI | ||||||
687.40 (M - SD) | -0.001 | 0.03 | [-0.06, 0.05] | |||||
901.31 (M) | -0.03 | 0.02 | [-0.08, -0.06] | |||||
1115.22 (M + SD) | -0.06 | 0.03 | [-0.14, -0.01] |
[1] |
Archer, J.(2006). Testosterone and human aggression: An evaluation of the challenge hypothesis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(3), 319-345.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.12.007 URL pmid: 16483890 |
[2] |
Boksem, M. A., Mehta P. H., Van den Bergh, B., van Son, V., Trautmann, S. T., Roelofs, K., ... Sanfey, A. G.(2013). Testosterone inhibits trust but promotes reciprocity. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2306-2314.
URL pmid: 24071565 |
[3] |
Bos, P. A., Panksepp, J., Bluthé, R. M., & van Honk, J.(2012). Acute effects of steroid hormones and neuropeptides on human social-emotional behavior: A review of single administration studies. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 33(1), 17-35.
URL pmid: 21256859 |
[4] |
Brooks, J. H., & Reddon, J. R.(1996). Serum testosterone in violent and nonviolent young offenders. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 52(4), 475-483.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199607)52:4<475::AID-JCLP14>3.0.CO;2-D URL pmid: 8842886 |
[5] |
Buades‐Rotger, M., & Krämer, U. M.(2018). From words to action: Implicit attention to antisocial semantic cues predicts aggression and amygdala reactivity to angry faces in healthy young women. Aggressive Behavior, 44(6), 624-637.
URL pmid: 30141188 |
[6] |
Carré, J. M., & Archer, J.(2018). Testosterone and human behavior: The role of individual and contextual variables. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 149-153.
URL pmid: 29279215 |
[7] | Clarke-McLean, J. G.(1996). Social networks among incarcerated juvenile offenders. Social Development, 5(2), 203-217. |
[8] | Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A.(1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74-101. |
[9] | Dabbs, J. M., Carr, T. S., Frady, R. L., & Riad, J. K.(1995). Testosterone, crime, and misbehavior among 692 male prison inmates. Personality and Individual Differences, 18(5), 627-633. |
[10] | Dekkers, T. J., van Rentergem, J. A. A., Meijer, B., Popma, A., Wagemaker, E., & Huizenga, H. M.(2019). A meta- analytical evaluation of the dual-hormone hypothesis: Does cortisol moderate the relationship between testosterone and status, dominance, risk taking, aggression, and psychopathy? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 96, 250-271. |
[11] |
Denson, T. F., Ronay, R., von Hippel W., & Schira, M. M.(2013). Endogenous testosterone and cortisol modulate neural responses during induced anger control. Social Neuroscience, 8(2), 165-177.
URL pmid: 19101845 |
[12] |
Domes, G., Mense, J., Vohs, K., & Habermeyer, E.(2013). Offenders with antisocial personality disorder show attentional bias for violence-related stimuli. Psychiatry Research, 209(1), 78-84.
URL pmid: 23261185 |
[13] | Dreher, J. C., Dunne, S., Pazderska, A., Frodl, T., Nolan, J. J., & O'Doherty, J. P.(2016). Testosterone causes both prosocial and antisocial status-enhancing behaviors in human males . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(41), 11633-11638. |
[14] |
Eisenegger, C., Haushofer, J., & Fehr, E.(2011). The role of testosterone in social interaction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(6), 263-271.
URL pmid: 21616702 |
[15] | Fernàndez-Castillo, N., & Cormand, B (2016). Aggressive behavior in humans: Genes and pathways identified through association studies. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 171(5), 676-696. |
[16] | Gross, J. J.(2001). Emotion regulation in adulthood: Timing is everything. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 214-219. |
[17] | Grotzinger, A. D., Mann, F. D., Patterson, M. W., Tackett, J. L., Tucker-Drob, E. M., & Harden, K. P.(2018). Hair and salivary testosterone, hair cortisol, and externalizing behaviors in adolescents. Psychological Science, 29(5), 688-699. |
[18] | Guan, M., Liao, Y., Ren, H., Wang, X., Yang, Q., Liu, X., & Wang, W.(2015). Impaired response inhibition in juvenile delinquents with antisocial personality characteristics: A preliminary ERP study in a Go/Nogo task. Neuroscience Letters, 603, 1-5. |
[19] | Hakamata, Y., Lissek, S., Bar-Haim, Y., Britton, J. C., Fox, N. A., Leibenluft, E., ... Pine, D. S.(2010). Attention bias modification treatment: A meta-analysis toward the establishment of novel treatment for anxiety. Biological Psychiatry, 68(11), 982-990. |
[20] | Hayes, A. F.(2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation,moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf |
[21] | Huesmann, L. R.(2018). An integrative theoretical understanding of aggression: A brief exposition. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 119-124. |
[22] |
Knight, E. L., Sarkar, A., Prasad, S., & Mehta, P. H.(2020). Beyond the challenge hypothesis: The emergence of the dual-hormone hypothesis and recommendations for future research. Hormones and Behavior, 123, 104657.
URL pmid: 31863735 |
[23] |
Kuckertz, J. M., & Amir, N.(2015). Attention bias modification for anxiety and phobias: Current status and future directions. Current Psychiatry Reports, 17(2), 9.
URL pmid: 25620791 |
[24] | Laue, C., Griffey, M., Lin, P. I., Wallace, K., van der Schoot M., Horn, P., ... Barzman, D.(2018). Eye gaze patterns associated with aggressive tendencies in adolescence. Psychiatric Quarterly, 89(3), 747-756. |
[25] | Lee, A. H., & DiGiuseppe, R.(2018). Anger and aggression treatments: A review of meta-analyses. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 65-74. |
[26] | Li, X. Y., Fei, L. P., Zhang, Y. L., Nun, Y. J., Tong, Y. S., & Yang, S. J.(2011). Development, reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Buss & Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Chinese Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 37(10), 607-613. |
[ 李献云, 费立鹏, 张亚利, 牛雅娟, 童永胜, 杨少杰.(2011). Buss和Perry攻击问卷中文版的修订和信效度. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 37(10), 607-613.] | |
[27] |
Lievaart, M., Huijding, J., van der Veen, F. M., Hovens, J. E., & Franken, I. H. A.(2017). The impact of angry rumination on anger-primed cognitive control. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 54, 135-142.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.07.016 URL pmid: 27494341 |
[28] | Lu, Q., Guo, K. Y., Zhang, M., Zhang, X. B., Hu, F. Q., & Yang, J. L.(2018). Chinese juvenile delinquency research report 2017: Based on a comparative study of juvenile offenders and other groups. Juvenile Delinquency, 219(6), 31-45. |
[ 路琦, 郭开元, 张萌, 张晓冰, 胡发清, 杨江澜.(2018). 2017年我国未成年人犯罪研究报告——基于未成年犯与其他群体的比较研究. 青少年犯罪问题, 219(6), 31-45.] | |
[29] | Manning, K. E.(2019). Seeing red? A systematic review of the evidence for attentional biases to threat-relevant stimuli in propensity to reactive aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 50, 101359. |
[30] |
Mehta, P. H., & Josephs, R. A.(2010). Testosterone and cortisol jointly regulate dominance: Evidence for a dual- hormone hypothesis. Hormones and Behavior, 58(5), 898-906.
URL pmid: 20816841 |
[31] |
Miller, N. V., & Johnston, C.(2019). Social threat attentional bias in childhood: Relations to aggression and hostile intent attributions. Aggressive Behavior, 45(3), 245-254.
URL pmid: 30635910 |
[32] |
Montoya, E. R., Terburg, D D., Bos, P. A., & van Honk, J. (2012). Testosterone, cortisol, and serotonin as key regulators of social aggression: A review and theoretical perspective. Motivation and Emotion, 36(1), 65-73.
URL pmid: 22448079 |
[33] |
O'Neal, C. R., Brotman, L. M., Huang, K. Y., Gouley, K. K., Kamboukos, D., Calzada, E. J., & Pine, D. S.(2010). Understanding relations among early family environment, cortisol response, and child aggression via a prevention experiment. Child Development, 81(1), 290-305.
URL pmid: 20331668 |
[34] |
Panagiotidis, D., Clemens, B., Habel, U., Schneider, F., Schneider, I., Wagels, L., & Votinov, M.(2017). Exogenous testosterone in a non-social provocation paradigm potentiates anger but not behavioral aggression. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 27(11), 1172-1184.
URL pmid: 28939164 |
[35] |
Panizzon, M. S., Hauger, R. L., Xian, H., Jacobson, K., Lyons M. J., Franz, C. E., & Kremen, W. S.(2018). Interactive effects of testosterone and cortisol on hippocampal volume and episodic memory in middle-aged men. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 91, 115-122.
URL pmid: 29547742 |
[36] | Popma, A., Vermeiren, R., Geluk, C. A., Rinne, T., van den Brink W., Knol, D. L., ... Doreleijers, T. A.(2007). Cortisol moderates the relationship between testosterone and aggression in delinquent male adolescents. Biological Psychiatry, 61(3), 405-411. |
[37] |
Prasad, S., Knight, E. L., & Mehta, P. H.(2019). Basal testosterone's relationship with dictator game decision-making depends on cortisol reactivity to acute stress: A dual-hormone perspective on dominant behavior during resource allocation. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 101, 150-159.
URL pmid: 30463044 |
[38] |
Radke, S., Volman, I., Mehta P., van Son, V., Enter, D., Sanfey, A., ... Roelofs, K.(2015). Testosterone biases the amygdala toward social threat approach. Science Advances, 1(5), e1400074.
URL pmid: 26601187 |
[39] | Rosell, D. R., & Siever, L. J.(2015). The neurobiology of aggression and violence. CNS Spectrums, 20(3), 254-279. |
[40] |
Roy, A. K., Vasa, R. A., Bruck, M., Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., Sweeney, M., CAMS Team.(2008). Attention bias toward threat in pediatric anxiety disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 47(10), 1189-1196.
URL pmid: 18698266 |
[41] |
Smillie, L. D., Pickering, A. D., & Jackson, C. J.(2006). The new reinforcement sensitivity theory: Implications for personality measurement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 320-335.
URL pmid: 17201591 |
[42] | Terburg, D., & van Honk, J.(2013). Approach-avoidance versus dominance-submissiveness: A multilevel neural framework on how testosterone promotes social status. Emotion Review, 5(3), 296-302. |
[43] |
Terburg, D., Aarts, H., & van Honk, J. (2012). Testosterone affects gaze aversion from angry faces outside of conscious awareness. Psychological Science, 23(5), 459-463.
URL pmid: 22477106 |
[44] |
Terburg, D., Morgan, B., & van Honk, J.(2009). The testosterone-cortisol ratio: A hormonal marker for proneness to social aggression. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 32(4), 216-223.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.04.008 URL pmid: 19446881 |
[45] | Tremblay, R. E.(1998). Testosterone, physical aggression, dominance, and physical development in early adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22(4), 753-777. |
[46] |
van Peer, J. M., Enter, D., van Steenbergen, H., Spinhoven, P., & Roelofs, K.(2017). Exogenous testosterone affects early threat processing in socially anxious and healthy women. Biological Psychology, 129, 82-89.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.08.003 URL pmid: 28811112 |
[47] |
Vasquez, E. A., Pedersen, W. C., Bushman, B. J., Kelley, N. J., Demeestere, P., & Miller, N.(2013). Lashing out after stewing over public insults: The effects of public provocation, provocation intensity, and rumination on triggered displaced aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 39(1), 13-29.
doi: 10.1002/ab.21453 URL pmid: 23042637 |
[48] |
Wibral, M., Dohmen, T., Klingmüller, D., Weber, B., & Falk, A.(2012). Testosterone administration reduces lying in men. PloS One, 7(10), e46774.
URL pmid: 23071635 |
[49] |
Wilkowski, B. M., & Robinson, M. D.(2010). The anatomy of anger: An integrative cognitive model of trait anger and reactive aggression. Journal of Personality, 78(1), 9-38.
URL pmid: 20433611 |
[50] | Yang, B., Xiao, Y. Q., Lai, L., & Wu, M. X.(2018). Evidence- based modification of juvenile violent delinquency. Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Research, 1, 32-42. |
[ 杨波, 肖玉琴, 赖琳, 吴明霞.(2018). 未成年暴力犯的询证矫正. 预防青少年犯罪研究, 1, 32-42.] | |
[51] | Zvielli, A., Bernstein, A., & Koster, E. H.(2015). Temporal dynamics of attentional bias. Clinical Psychological Science, 3(5), 772-788. |
[1] | 林小楠, 曹衍淼, 张文新, 纪林芹. 多巴胺系统多基因与青少年攻击行为的U型关系:母亲消极教养的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(4): 588-599. |
[2] | 尹华站, 张丽, 刘鹏玉, 李丹. 负性情绪的动机维度对时距知觉的影响:注意控制和注意偏向的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(12): 1917-1931. |
[3] | 靳娟娟, 邵蕾, 黄潇潇, 张亚利, 俞国良. 社会排斥与攻击的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(12): 1979-1996. |
[4] | 王霈珊, 古若雷, 张亮. 急性应激与风险倾向:兴奋易感性的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 45-54. |
[5] | 彭宇彬, 宛小昂. 视觉搜索中风味引发对关联颜色的注意偏向[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(7): 736-747. |
[6] | 张妮, 刘文, 刘方, 郭鑫. 8~12岁儿童抑郁与认知重评的关系:悲伤面孔注意偏向的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(1): 25-39. |
[7] | 侯娟, 朱英格, 方晓义. 手机成瘾与抑郁:社交焦虑和负性情绪信息注意偏向的多重中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(4): 362-373. |
[8] | 华艳, 李明霞, 王巧婷, 冯彩霞, 张晶. 左侧眶额皮层在自动情绪调节下注意选择中的作用:来自经颅直流电刺激的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(9): 1048-1056. |
[9] | 雷怡, 夏琦, 莫志凤, 李红. 面孔可爱度和客观熟悉度对婴儿面孔注意偏向效应的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(7): 811-822. |
[10] | 胡娜, 陈安涛, 王宴庆, 李晴, 许珍珍, 龙泉杉. 急性应激损伤错误监控与错误后调整[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(2): 162-172. |
[11] | 刘静远, 李虹. 状态焦虑对时距知觉的影响:认知评价和注意偏向有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(7): 747-758. |
[12] | 黄潇潇, 张宝山, 张媛, 麻雨婷. 元刻板印象对随迁儿童攻击行为的效应及挫折感的中介作用 *[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(4): 484-496. |
[13] | 彭惠妮, 吴健辉, 孙小方, 关青, 罗跃嘉. 特质焦虑对急性心理性应激反应的预测 *[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 997-1006. |
[14] | 金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 乌云特娜, 金祥忠. 暴力环境接触对大学生网络攻击行为的影响:反刍思维与网络道德的作用 *[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 1051-1060. |
[15] | 袁小钧, 崔晓霞, 曹正操, 阚红, 王晓, 汪亚珉. 虚拟仿真场景中威胁性视觉刺激搜索的注意偏向效应 *[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(6): 622-636. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||