心理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (4): 588-599.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.00588
收稿日期:
2022-03-17
发布日期:
2022-12-30
出版日期:
2023-04-25
通讯作者:
纪林芹
E-mail:sdjlq@126.com
基金资助:
LIN Xiaonan, CAO Yanmiao, ZHANG Wenxin, JI Linqin()
Received:
2022-03-17
Online:
2022-12-30
Published:
2023-04-25
Contact:
JI Linqin
E-mail:sdjlq@126.com
摘要:
多巴胺活性与攻击相关的脑功能活动呈倒U型关系。本研究对1044名汉族青少年(初次测评时M age=13.32 ± 0.49岁, 50.2%女生)的攻击行为进行间隔一年的两次测评, 采用多基因累积分范式考察多巴胺系统的多基因功能积分与青少年攻击行为间的关系以及母亲消极教养的调节作用。结果发现, 多巴胺系统多基因累积分二次项与母亲消极教养交互影响两个时间点的青少年攻击行为:在较高母亲消极教养条件下, 携带较多或较少低多巴胺活性相关等位基因的青少年表现出高水平的攻击行为, 呈U型关系; 在较低母亲消极教养条件下, 多基因累积分二次项与青少年的攻击行为关系不显著。本研究为多巴胺系统基因的联合效应与母亲消极教养调节青少年攻击行为的基因作用机制提供证据。
中图分类号:
林小楠, 曹衍淼, 张文新, 纪林芹. (2023). 多巴胺系统多基因与青少年攻击行为的U型关系:母亲消极教养的调节作用. 心理学报, 55(4), 588-599.
LIN Xiaonan, CAO Yanmiao, ZHANG Wenxin, JI Linqin. (2023). The U-shaped relationship between dopaminergic genes and adolescent aggressive behavior: The moderating role of maternal negative parenting. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 55(4), 588-599.
变量 | M | SD | 性别a | 多基因 累积分 | 消极 教养 | T1 攻击 | T2 攻击 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别 | — | — | 1 | ||||
多基因累积分 | — | — | −0.02 | 1 | |||
消极教养 | 0.99 | 0.48 | 0.11*** | 0.03 | 1 | ||
T1攻击 | −0.12 | 0.68 | 0.22*** | −0.02 | 0.12*** | 1 | |
T2攻击 | −0.09 | 0.71 | 0.20*** | −0.01 | 0.12*** | 0.76*** | 1 |
表1 描述统计与相关系数
变量 | M | SD | 性别a | 多基因 累积分 | 消极 教养 | T1 攻击 | T2 攻击 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别 | — | — | 1 | ||||
多基因累积分 | — | — | −0.02 | 1 | |||
消极教养 | 0.99 | 0.48 | 0.11*** | 0.03 | 1 | ||
T1攻击 | −0.12 | 0.68 | 0.22*** | −0.02 | 0.12*** | 1 | |
T2攻击 | −0.09 | 0.71 | 0.20*** | −0.01 | 0.12*** | 0.76*** | 1 |
变量 | ΔR2 | 第一层 | 第二层 | 第三层 | 第四层 | 第五层 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | ||
性别 | 0.05*** | 0.22 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.22 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 |
NP | 0.01** | 0.10 | 0.002 | 0.10 | 0.002 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.03 | 0.38 | ||
MGPS | −0.03 | 0.36 | −0.03 | 0.37 | −0.03 | 0.31 | −0.04 | 0.21 | |||
MGPS×NP | 0.00 | −0.01 | 0.70 | −0.02 | 0.60 | −0.05 | 0.15 | ||||
MGPS2 | 0.001 | 0.04 | 0.22 | 0.03 | 0.42 | ||||||
MGPS2×NP | 0.007** | 0.11 | 0.006 |
表2 多基因累积分与母亲消极教养对T1攻击行为的影响
变量 | ΔR2 | 第一层 | 第二层 | 第三层 | 第四层 | 第五层 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | ||
性别 | 0.05*** | 0.22 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.22 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 |
NP | 0.01** | 0.10 | 0.002 | 0.10 | 0.002 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.03 | 0.38 | ||
MGPS | −0.03 | 0.36 | −0.03 | 0.37 | −0.03 | 0.31 | −0.04 | 0.21 | |||
MGPS×NP | 0.00 | −0.01 | 0.70 | −0.02 | 0.60 | −0.05 | 0.15 | ||||
MGPS2 | 0.001 | 0.04 | 0.22 | 0.03 | 0.42 | ||||||
MGPS2×NP | 0.007** | 0.11 | 0.006 |
变量 | ΔR2 | 第一层 | 第二层 | 第三层 | 第四层 | 第五层 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | ||
性别 | 0.04*** | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.20 | <0.001 | 0.19 | <0.001 | 0.20 | <0.001 | 0.19 | <0.001 |
NP | 0.01** | 0.10 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.004 | 0.03 | 0.38 | ||
MGPS | −0.02 | 0.57 | −0.02 | 0.56 | −0.02 | 0.44 | −0.03 | 0.31 | |||
MGPS×NP | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.81 | <0.001 | 0.99 | −0.03 | 0.39 | ||||
MGPS2 | 0.004* | 0.06 | 0.048 | 0.05 | 0.12 | ||||||
MGPS2×NP | 0.006* | 0.11 | 0.01 |
表3 多基因累积分与母亲消极教养对T2攻击行为的影响
变量 | ΔR2 | 第一层 | 第二层 | 第三层 | 第四层 | 第五层 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | ||
性别 | 0.04*** | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.20 | <0.001 | 0.19 | <0.001 | 0.20 | <0.001 | 0.19 | <0.001 |
NP | 0.01** | 0.10 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.004 | 0.03 | 0.38 | ||
MGPS | −0.02 | 0.57 | −0.02 | 0.56 | −0.02 | 0.44 | −0.03 | 0.31 | |||
MGPS×NP | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.81 | <0.001 | 0.99 | −0.03 | 0.39 | ||||
MGPS2 | 0.004* | 0.06 | 0.048 | 0.05 | 0.12 | ||||||
MGPS2×NP | 0.006* | 0.11 | 0.01 |
变量 | ΔR2 | 第一层 | 第二层 | 第三层 | 第四层 | 第五层 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | ||
COMT Val158Met | |||||||||||
性别 | 0.05*** | 0.22 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 |
NP | 0.01** | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.07 | 0.13 | ||
COMT | 0.01 | 0.72 | 0.01 | 0.71 | 0.04 | 0.34 | 0.04 | 0.34 | |||
COMT×NP | 0.00 | −0.01 | 0.82 | −0.004 | 0.90 | −0.04 | 0.46 | ||||
COMT2 | 0.001 | −0.04 | 0.31 | −0.05 | 0.27 | ||||||
COMT2×NP | 0.001 | 0.05 | 0.38 | ||||||||
DRD2 rs1799978 | |||||||||||
性别 | 0.05*** | 0.22 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 |
NP | 0.01** | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.05 | ||
DRD2 | −0.04 | 0.16 | −0.04 | 0.16 | −0.07 | 0.16 | −0.07 | 0.16 | |||
DRD2×NP | 0.00 | −0.01 | 0.72 | −0.01 | 0.71 | −0.02 | 0.73 | ||||
DRD22 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.50 | 0.03 | 0.50 | ||||||
DRD22×NP | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.91 | ||||||||
DAT1 rs27072 | |||||||||||
性别 | 0.05*** | 0.22 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 |
NP | 0.01** | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.05 | 0.27 | ||
DAT1 | −0.02 | 0.50 | −0.02 | 0.50 | −0.02 | 0.64 | −0.02 | 0.63 | |||
DAT1×NP | 0.00 | −0.01 | 0.81 | −0.01 | 0.81 | 0.02 | 0.56 | ||||
DAT12 | 0.00 | 0.001 | 0.97 | 0.002 | 0.96 | ||||||
DAT12×NP | 0.002 | 0.07 | 0.19 |
表S1 单基因与母亲消极教养对T1攻击行为的影响
变量 | ΔR2 | 第一层 | 第二层 | 第三层 | 第四层 | 第五层 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | ||
COMT Val158Met | |||||||||||
性别 | 0.05*** | 0.22 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 |
NP | 0.01** | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.07 | 0.13 | ||
COMT | 0.01 | 0.72 | 0.01 | 0.71 | 0.04 | 0.34 | 0.04 | 0.34 | |||
COMT×NP | 0.00 | −0.01 | 0.82 | −0.004 | 0.90 | −0.04 | 0.46 | ||||
COMT2 | 0.001 | −0.04 | 0.31 | −0.05 | 0.27 | ||||||
COMT2×NP | 0.001 | 0.05 | 0.38 | ||||||||
DRD2 rs1799978 | |||||||||||
性别 | 0.05*** | 0.22 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 |
NP | 0.01** | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.05 | ||
DRD2 | −0.04 | 0.16 | −0.04 | 0.16 | −0.07 | 0.16 | −0.07 | 0.16 | |||
DRD2×NP | 0.00 | −0.01 | 0.72 | −0.01 | 0.71 | −0.02 | 0.73 | ||||
DRD22 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.50 | 0.03 | 0.50 | ||||||
DRD22×NP | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.91 | ||||||||
DAT1 rs27072 | |||||||||||
性别 | 0.05*** | 0.22 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 |
NP | 0.01** | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.05 | 0.27 | ||
DAT1 | −0.02 | 0.50 | −0.02 | 0.50 | −0.02 | 0.64 | −0.02 | 0.63 | |||
DAT1×NP | 0.00 | −0.01 | 0.81 | −0.01 | 0.81 | 0.02 | 0.56 | ||||
DAT12 | 0.00 | 0.001 | 0.97 | 0.002 | 0.96 | ||||||
DAT12×NP | 0.002 | 0.07 | 0.19 |
变量 | ΔR2 | 第一层 | 第二层 | 第三层 | 第四层 | 第五层 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | ||
COMT Val158Met | |||||||||||
性别 | 0.04*** | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.20 | <0.001 | 0.19 | <0.001 | 0.19 | <0.001 | 0.19 | <0.001 |
NP | 0.01** | 0.09 | 0.004 | 0.09 | 0.007 | 0.09 | 0.007 | 0.07 | 0.12 | ||
COMT | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.18 | |||
COMT×NP | 0.001 | 0.03 | 0.30 | 0.03 | 0.28 | 0.02 | 0.75 | ||||
COMT2 | 0.00 | −0.02 | 0.58 | −0.03 | 0.54 | ||||||
COMT2×NP | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.58 | ||||||||
DRD2 rs1799978 | |||||||||||
性别 | 0.04*** | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.20 | <0.001 | 0.19 | <0.001 | 0.19 | <0.001 | 0.19 | <0.001 |
NP | 0.01** | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.08 | 0.08 | ||
DRD2 | −0.04 | 0.16 | −0.04 | 0.16 | −0.05 | 0.29 | −0.05 | 0.28 | |||
DRD2×NP | 0.001 | −0.03 | 0.31 | −0.03 | 0.30 | −0.05 | 0.32 | ||||
DRD22 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.83 | 0.01 | 0.83 | ||||||
DRD22×NP | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.69 | ||||||||
DAT1 rs27072 | |||||||||||
性别 | 0.04*** | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.20 | <0.001 | 0.20 | <0.001 | 0.20 | <0.001 | 0.20 | <0.001 |
NP | 0.01** | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.10 | 0.002 | 0.04 | 0.33 | ||
DAT1 | −0.04 | 0.27 | −0.04 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 0.60 | 0.02 | 0.61 | |||
DAT1×NP | 0.00 | −0.002 | 0.94 | −0.004 | 0.89 | 0.03 | 0.42 | ||||
DAT12 | 0.004 | 0.08 | 0.054 | 0.08 | 0.051 | ||||||
DAT12×NP | 0.002 | 0.08 | 0.13 |
表S2 单基因与母亲消极教养对T2攻击行为的影响
变量 | ΔR2 | 第一层 | 第二层 | 第三层 | 第四层 | 第五层 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | ||
COMT Val158Met | |||||||||||
性别 | 0.04*** | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.20 | <0.001 | 0.19 | <0.001 | 0.19 | <0.001 | 0.19 | <0.001 |
NP | 0.01** | 0.09 | 0.004 | 0.09 | 0.007 | 0.09 | 0.007 | 0.07 | 0.12 | ||
COMT | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.18 | |||
COMT×NP | 0.001 | 0.03 | 0.30 | 0.03 | 0.28 | 0.02 | 0.75 | ||||
COMT2 | 0.00 | −0.02 | 0.58 | −0.03 | 0.54 | ||||||
COMT2×NP | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.58 | ||||||||
DRD2 rs1799978 | |||||||||||
性别 | 0.04*** | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.20 | <0.001 | 0.19 | <0.001 | 0.19 | <0.001 | 0.19 | <0.001 |
NP | 0.01** | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.08 | 0.08 | ||
DRD2 | −0.04 | 0.16 | −0.04 | 0.16 | −0.05 | 0.29 | −0.05 | 0.28 | |||
DRD2×NP | 0.001 | −0.03 | 0.31 | −0.03 | 0.30 | −0.05 | 0.32 | ||||
DRD22 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.83 | 0.01 | 0.83 | ||||||
DRD22×NP | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.69 | ||||||||
DAT1 rs27072 | |||||||||||
性别 | 0.04*** | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.20 | <0.001 | 0.20 | <0.001 | 0.20 | <0.001 | 0.20 | <0.001 |
NP | 0.01** | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.10 | 0.002 | 0.04 | 0.33 | ||
DAT1 | −0.04 | 0.27 | −0.04 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 0.60 | 0.02 | 0.61 | |||
DAT1×NP | 0.00 | −0.002 | 0.94 | −0.004 | 0.89 | 0.03 | 0.42 | ||||
DAT12 | 0.004 | 0.08 | 0.054 | 0.08 | 0.051 | ||||||
DAT12×NP | 0.002 | 0.08 | 0.13 |
变量 | ΔR2 | 第一层 | 第二层 | 第三层 | 第四层 | 第五层 | 95% CIa | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | |||
子样本1 | ||||||||||||
性别 | 0.05*** | 0.22 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | [0.14, 0.35] |
NP | 0.004 | 0.06 | 0.19 | 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.06 | 0.20 | −0.01 | 0.81 | [−0.08, 0.06] | ||
MGPS | 0.001 | 0.98 | 0.001 | 0.99 | 0.001 | 0.99 | −0.02 | 0.75 | [−0.06, 0.05] | |||
MGPS×NP | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.79 | 0.01 | 0.79 | −0.01 | 0.84 | [−0.07, 0.05] | ||||
MGPS2 | 0.00 | 0.002 | 0.96 | −0.02 | 0.66 | [−0.05, 0.03] | ||||||
MGPS2×NP | 0.01* | 0.13 | 0.03 | [0.005, 0.10] | ||||||||
子样本2 | ||||||||||||
性别 | 0.05*** | 0.23 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.22 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | [0.18, 0.40] |
NP | 0.02* | 0.12 | 0.005 | 0.12 | 0.004 | 0.12 | 0.005 | 0.06 | 0.20 | [−0.03, 0.11] | ||
MGPS | −0.05 | 0.24 | −0.05 | 0.26 | −0.06 | 0.18 | −0.06 | 0.15 | [−0.10, 0.02] | |||
MGPS×NP | 0.001 | −0.03 | 0.47 | −0.04 | 0.40 | −0.07 | 0.17 | [−0.11, 0.01] | ||||
MGPS2 | 0.004 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.19 | [−0.01, 0.07] | ||||||
MGPS2×NP | 0.006+ | 0.11 | 0.059 | [−0.001, 0.08] |
表S3 多基因累积分与母亲消极教养对T1攻击行为的影响
变量 | ΔR2 | 第一层 | 第二层 | 第三层 | 第四层 | 第五层 | 95% CIa | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | |||
子样本1 | ||||||||||||
性别 | 0.05*** | 0.22 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | [0.14, 0.35] |
NP | 0.004 | 0.06 | 0.19 | 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.06 | 0.20 | −0.01 | 0.81 | [−0.08, 0.06] | ||
MGPS | 0.001 | 0.98 | 0.001 | 0.99 | 0.001 | 0.99 | −0.02 | 0.75 | [−0.06, 0.05] | |||
MGPS×NP | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.79 | 0.01 | 0.79 | −0.01 | 0.84 | [−0.07, 0.05] | ||||
MGPS2 | 0.00 | 0.002 | 0.96 | −0.02 | 0.66 | [−0.05, 0.03] | ||||||
MGPS2×NP | 0.01* | 0.13 | 0.03 | [0.005, 0.10] | ||||||||
子样本2 | ||||||||||||
性别 | 0.05*** | 0.23 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.22 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | [0.18, 0.40] |
NP | 0.02* | 0.12 | 0.005 | 0.12 | 0.004 | 0.12 | 0.005 | 0.06 | 0.20 | [−0.03, 0.11] | ||
MGPS | −0.05 | 0.24 | −0.05 | 0.26 | −0.06 | 0.18 | −0.06 | 0.15 | [−0.10, 0.02] | |||
MGPS×NP | 0.001 | −0.03 | 0.47 | −0.04 | 0.40 | −0.07 | 0.17 | [−0.11, 0.01] | ||||
MGPS2 | 0.004 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.19 | [−0.01, 0.07] | ||||||
MGPS2×NP | 0.006+ | 0.11 | 0.059 | [−0.001, 0.08] |
变量 | ΔR2 | 第一层 | 第二层 | 第三层 | 第四层 | 第五层 | 95% CIa | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | |||
子样本1 | ||||||||||||
性别 | 0.04*** | 0.19 | <0.001 | 0.18 | <0.001 | 0.18 | <0.001 | 0.18 | <0.001 | 0.18 | <0.001 | [0.11, 0.34] |
NP | 0.005 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.001 | 0.99 | [−0.07, 0.07] | ||
MGPS | 0.001 | 0.98 | −0.001 | 0.98 | −0.003 | 0.95 | −0.02 | 0.73 | [−0.07, 0.05] | |||
MGPS×NP | 0.001 | 0.04 | 0.41 | 0.03 | 0.50 | 0.01 | 0.79 | [−0.06, 0.07] | ||||
MGPS2 | 0.002 | 0.04 | 0.39 | 0.02 | 0.67 | [−0.04, 0.06] | ||||||
MGPS2×NP | 0.007+ | 0.11 | 0.06 | [−0.002, 0.10] | ||||||||
子样本2 | ||||||||||||
性别 | 0.05*** | 0.22 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.22 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | [0.18, 0.41] |
NP | 0.01* | 0.11 | 0.008 | 0.12 | 0.007 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.31 | [−0.03, 0.11] | ||
MGPS | −0.03 | 0.45 | −0.03 | 0.47 | −0.04 | 0.33 | −0.05 | 0.28 | [−0.09, 0.03] | |||
MGPS×NP | 0.00 | −0.02 | 0.70 | −0.02 | 0.59 | −0.06 | 0.20 | [−0.10, 0.02] | ||||
MGPS2 | 0.006+ | 0.08 | 0.064 | 0.07 | 0.10 | [−0.01, 0.08] | ||||||
MGPS2×NP | 0.007+ | 0.11 | 0.056 | [−0.001, 0.08] |
表S4 多基因累积分与母亲消极教养对T2攻击行为的影响
变量 | ΔR2 | 第一层 | 第二层 | 第三层 | 第四层 | 第五层 | 95% CIa | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | |||
子样本1 | ||||||||||||
性别 | 0.04*** | 0.19 | <0.001 | 0.18 | <0.001 | 0.18 | <0.001 | 0.18 | <0.001 | 0.18 | <0.001 | [0.11, 0.34] |
NP | 0.005 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.001 | 0.99 | [−0.07, 0.07] | ||
MGPS | 0.001 | 0.98 | −0.001 | 0.98 | −0.003 | 0.95 | −0.02 | 0.73 | [−0.07, 0.05] | |||
MGPS×NP | 0.001 | 0.04 | 0.41 | 0.03 | 0.50 | 0.01 | 0.79 | [−0.06, 0.07] | ||||
MGPS2 | 0.002 | 0.04 | 0.39 | 0.02 | 0.67 | [−0.04, 0.06] | ||||||
MGPS2×NP | 0.007+ | 0.11 | 0.06 | [−0.002, 0.10] | ||||||||
子样本2 | ||||||||||||
性别 | 0.05*** | 0.22 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.22 | <0.001 | 0.21 | <0.001 | [0.18, 0.41] |
NP | 0.01* | 0.11 | 0.008 | 0.12 | 0.007 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.31 | [−0.03, 0.11] | ||
MGPS | −0.03 | 0.45 | −0.03 | 0.47 | −0.04 | 0.33 | −0.05 | 0.28 | [−0.09, 0.03] | |||
MGPS×NP | 0.00 | −0.02 | 0.70 | −0.02 | 0.59 | −0.06 | 0.20 | [−0.10, 0.02] | ||||
MGPS2 | 0.006+ | 0.08 | 0.064 | 0.07 | 0.10 | [−0.01, 0.08] | ||||||
MGPS2×NP | 0.007+ | 0.11 | 0.056 | [−0.001, 0.08] |
[1] |
Achterberg, M., van Duijvenvoorde, A. C., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Crone, E. A. (2020). Longitudinal changes in DLPFC activation during childhood are related to decreased aggression following social rejection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(15), 8602-8610.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915124117 URL |
[2] |
Albaugh, M. D., Harder, V. S., Althoff, R. R., Rettew, D. C., Ehli, E. A., Lengyel-Nelson, T., ... Hudziak, J. J. (2010). COMT Val158Met genotype as a risk factor for problem behaviors in youth. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 49(8), 841-849.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.015 URL |
[3] |
Ansary, N. S., McMahon, T. J., & Luthar, S. S. (2017). Trajectories of emotional-behavioral difficulty and academic competence: A 6-year, person-centered, prospective study of affluent suburban adolescents. Development and Psychopathology, 29(1), 215-234.
doi: 10.1017/S0954579416000110 pmid: 26899949 |
[4] |
Arnsten, A. F. (2009). Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(6), 410-422.
doi: 10.1038/nrn2648 pmid: 19455173 |
[5] |
Avinun, R., Nevo, A., Radtke, S. R., Brigidi, B. D., & Hariri, A. R. (2020). Divergence of an association between depressive symptoms and a dopamine polygenic score in Caucasians and Asians. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 270(2), 229-235.
doi: 10.1007/s00406-019-01040-x pmid: 31289926 |
[6] |
Beauchaine, T. P., Gatzke-Kopp, L. M., & Mead, H. K. (2007). Polyvagal theory and developmental psychopathology: Emotion dysregulation and conduct problems from preschool to adolescence. Biological Psychology, 74(2), 174-184.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.08.008 pmid: 17045726 |
[7] |
Bertolino, A., Fazio, L., Di Giorgio, A., Blasi, G., Romano, R., Taurisano, P., ... Sadee, W. (2009). Genetically determined interaction between the dopamine transporter and the D2 receptor on prefronto-striatal activity and volume in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(4), 1224-1234.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4858-08.2009 pmid: 19176830 |
[8] | Cao, C., & Rijlaarsdam, J. (2022). Childhood parenting and adolescent internalizing and externalizing symptoms: Moderation by multilocus hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis-related genetic variation. Development and Psychopathology, Advanced online publication. |
[9] |
Cao, Y, M., & Zhang, W. X. (2019). The influence of dopaminergic genetic variants and maternal parenting on adolescent depressive symptoms: A multilocus genetic study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51, 1102-1115.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.01102 URL |
[曹衍淼, 张文新. (2019). 多巴胺系统基因与母亲教养行为对青少年抑郁的影响: 一项多基因研究. 心理学报, 51, 1102-1115.] | |
[10] |
Cardon, L. R., & Palmer, L. J. (2003). Population stratification and spurious allelic association. Lancet, 361(9357), 598-604.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12520-2 pmid: 12598158 |
[11] |
Chen, J., Lipska, B. K., Halim, N., Ma, Q. D., Matsumoto, M., Melhem, S., ... Weinberger, D. R. (2004). Functional analysis of genetic variation in catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT): Effects on mRNA, protein, and enzyme activity in postmortem human brain. American Journal of Human Genetics, 75(5), 807-821.
doi: 10.1086/425589 pmid: 15457404 |
[12] |
Chen, L., Zhang, W., Ji, L., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2019). Developmental trajectories of Chinese adolescents’ relational aggression: Associations with changes in social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 90(6), 2153-2170.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.v90.6 URL |
[13] |
Chen, X., Liu, M., Li, B., Cen, G., Chen, H., & Wang, L. (2000). Maternal authoritative and authoritarian attitudes and mother-child interactions and relationships in urban China. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24(1), 119-126.
doi: 10.1080/016502500383557 URL |
[14] |
Chester, D. S., & DeWall, C. N. (2016). The pleasure of revenge: Retaliatory aggression arises from a neural imbalance toward reward. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(7), 1173-1182.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv082 pmid: 26117504 |
[15] | Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. |
[16] |
Collins, L. M. (2006). Analysis of longitudinal data: The Integration of Theoretical Model, Temporal Design, and Statistical Model. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 505-528.
pmid: 16318605 |
[17] |
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710-722.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00900.x pmid: 7789197 |
[18] |
Davies, P., Cicchetti, D., & Hentges, R. F. (2015). Maternal unresponsiveness and child disruptive problems: The interplay of uninhibited temperament and dopamine transporter genes. Child Development, 86(1), 63-79.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.12281 pmid: 25130210 |
[19] |
Davies, P. T., Pearson, J. K., Cicchetti, D., Martin, M. J., & Cummings, E. M. (2019). Emotional insecurity as a mediator of the moderating role of dopamine genes in the association between interparental conflict and youth externalizing problems. Development and Psychopathology, 31(3), 1111-1126.
doi: 10.1017/S0954579419000634 pmid: 31057130 |
[20] |
Dormann, C., & Griffin, M. A. (2015). Optimal time lags in panel studies. Psychological Methods, 20(4), 489-505.
doi: 10.1037/met0000041 pmid: 26322999 |
[21] |
Estévez, E., Jiménez, T. I., & Moreno, D. (2018). Aggressive behavior in adolescence as a predictor of personal, family, and school adjustment problems. Psicothema, 30(1), 66-73.
doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.294 pmid: 29363473 |
[22] |
Evans, M. G. (1985). A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(3), 305-323.
doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(85)90002-0 URL |
[23] |
Fan, X. H., Fang, X. Y., Liu, Y., Lin, X. Y., & Yuan, X. J. (2012). The effect of social support and social identity on the relationship between perceived discrimination and socio-cultural adjustment among Chinese migrant children. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(5), 647-663.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.00647 URL |
[范兴华, 方晓义, 刘杨, 蔺秀云, 袁晓娇. (2012). 流动儿童歧视知觉与社会文化适应: 社会支持和社会认同的作用. 心理学报, 44(5), 647-663.] | |
[24] |
Ganiban, J. M., Liu, C., Zappaterra, L., An, S., Natsuaki, M. N., Neiderhiser, J. M., ... Leve, L. D. (2021). Gene × environment interactions in the development of preschool effortful control, and its implications for childhood externalizing behavior. Behavior Genetics, 51(5), 448-462.
doi: 10.1007/s10519-021-10073-9 pmid: 34160711 |
[25] |
Gard, A. M., Hein, T. C., Mitchell, C., Brooks-Gunn, J., McLanahan, S. S., Monk, C. S., & Hyde, L. W. (2022). Prospective longitudinal associations between harsh parenting and corticolimbic function during adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 34(3), 981-996.
doi: 10.1017/S0954579420001583 URL |
[26] |
Gatzke-Kopp, L. M. (2011). The canary in the coalmine: The sensitivity of mesolimbic dopamine to environmental adversity during development. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(3), 794-803.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.09.013 URL |
[27] |
Genis-Mendoza, A. D., López-Narvaez, M. L., Tovilla-Zárate, C. A., Sarmiento, E., Chavez, A., Martinez-Magaña, J. J., ... Nicolini, H. (2018). Association between polymorphisms of the DRD2 and ANKK1 genes and suicide attempt: A preliminary case-control study in a Mexican population. Neuropsychobiology, 76(4), 193-198.
doi: 10.1159/000490071 URL |
[28] |
Gershoff, E. T. (2002). Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 539-579.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.539 pmid: 12081081 |
[29] | Goulter, N., McMahon, R. J., Pasalich, D. S., & Dodge, K. A. (2020). Indirect effects of early parenting on adult antisocial outcomes via adolescent conduct disorder symptoms and callous-unemotional traits. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 49(6), 930-942. |
[30] |
Haans, R. F., Pieters, C., & He, Z. L. (2016). Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U- and inverted U- shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1177-1195.
doi: 10.1002/smj.2016.37.issue-7 URL |
[31] |
Harden, K. P., Patterson, M. W., Briley, D. A., Engelhardt, L. E., Kretsch, N., Mann, F. D., ... Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2015). Developmental changes in genetic and environmental influences on rule-breaking and aggression: Age and pubertal development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56(12), 1370-1379.
doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12419 URL |
[32] | Hasan, A., & Afzal, M. (2019). Gene and environment interplay in cognition: Evidence from twin and molecular studies, future directions and suggestions for effective candidate gene × environment (cG×E) research. Multiple Sclerosis & Related Disorders, 33, 121-130. |
[33] |
Hygen, B. W., Belsky, J., Stenseng, F., Lydersen, S., Guzey, I. C., & Wichstrøm, L. (2015). Child exposure to serious life events, COMT, and aggression: Testing differential susceptibility theory. Developmental Psychology, 51(8), 1098-1104.
doi: 10.1037/dev0000020 pmid: 26053146 |
[34] |
Jones, G., Zammit, S., Norton, N., Hamshere, M. L., Jones, S. J., Milham, C., ... Owen, M. J. (2001). Aggressive behaviour in patients with schizophrenia is associated with catechol-O-methyltransferase genotype. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 179(4), 351-355.
doi: 10.1192/bjp.179.4.351 URL |
[35] |
Kochanska, G., Kim, S., Barry, R. A., & Philibert, R. A. (2011). Children’s genotypes interact with maternal responsive care in predicting children’s competence: Diathesis-stress or differential susceptibility? Development and Psychopathology, 23(2), 605-616.
doi: 10.1017/S0954579411000071 pmid: 23786699 |
[36] |
Lotta, T., Vidgren, J., Tilgmann, C., Ulmanen, I., Melén, K., Julkunen, I., & Taskinen, J. (1995). Kinetics of human soluble and membrane-bound catechol O-methyltransferase: A revised mechanism and description of the thermolabile variant of the enzyme. Biochemistry, 34(13), 4202-4210.
doi: 10.1021/bi00013a008 pmid: 7703232 |
[37] |
Manolio, T. A., Collins, F. S., Cox, N. J., Goldstein, D. B., Hindorff, L. A., Hunter, D. J., ... Visscher, P. M. (2009). Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature, 461(7265), 747-753.
doi: 10.1038/nature08494 |
[38] | Marcot, B. G., & Hanea, A. M. (2021). What is an optimal value of kink-fold cross-validation in discrete Bayesian network analysis? Computational Statistics, 36(3), 2009-2031. |
[39] |
Mehari, K. R., Waasdorp, T. E., & Leff, S. S. (2019). Measuring relational and overt aggression by peer report: A comparison of peer nominations and peer ratings. Journal of School Violence, 18(3), 362-374.
doi: 10.1080/15388220.2018.1504684 pmid: 31462897 |
[40] |
Meyer, B. M., Huemer, J., Rabl, U., Boubela, R. N., Kalcher, K., Berger, A., ... Pezawas, L. (2016). Oppositional COMT Val158Met effects on resting state functional connectivity in adolescents and adults. Brain Structure and Function, 221(1), 103-114.
doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0895-5 pmid: 25319752 |
[41] |
Naneix, F., Marchand, A. R., Di Scala, G., Pape, J. R., & Coutureau, E. (2012). Parallel maturation of goal-directed behavior and dopaminergic systems during adolescence. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(46), 16223-16232.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3080-12.2012 pmid: 23152606 |
[42] |
Nikolova, Y. S., Ferrell, R. E., Manuck, S. B., & Hariri, A. R. (2011). Multilocus genetic profile for dopamine signaling predicts ventral striatum reactivity. Neuropsychopharmacology, 36(9), 1940-1947.
doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.82 pmid: 21593733 |
[43] |
Padmanabhan, A., & Luna, B. (2014). Developmental imaging genetics: Linking dopamine function to adolescent behavior. Brain and Cognition, 89, 27-38.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.09.011 pmid: 24139694 |
[44] |
Pinsonneault, J. K., Han, D. D., Burdick, K. E., Kataki, M., Bertolino, A., Malhotra, A. K., ... Sadee, W. (2011). Dopamine transporter gene variant affecting expression in human brain is associated with bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology, 36(8), 1644-1655.
doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.45 pmid: 21525861 |
[45] |
Raine, A. (2008). From genes to brain to antisocial behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(5), 323-328.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00599.x URL |
[46] |
Robbins, T. W., & Arnsten, A. F. (2009). The neuropsychopharmacology of fronto-executive function: Monoaminergic modulation. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 32, 267-287.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135535 pmid: 19555290 |
[47] |
Roisman, G. I., Newman, D. A., Fraley, R. C., Haltigan, J. D., Groh, A. M., & Haydon, K. C. (2012). Distinguishing differential susceptibility from diathesis-stress: Recommendations for evaluating interaction effects. Development and Psychopathology, 24(2), 389-409.
doi: 10.1017/S0954579412000065 pmid: 22559121 |
[48] |
Romeo, R. D. (2017). The impact of stress on the structure of the adolescent brain: Implications for adolescent mental health. Brain Research, 1654(Pt B),185-191.
doi: S0006-8993(16)30148-2 pmid: 27021951 |
[49] |
Rosell, D. R., & Siever, L. J. (2015). The neurobiology of aggression and violence. CNS Spectrums, 20(3), 254-279.
doi: 10.1017/S109285291500019X pmid: 25936249 |
[50] |
Sadeh, N., Spielberg, J. M., Logue, M. W., Hayes, J. P., Wolf, E. J., McGlinchey, R. E., ... Miller, M. W. (2019). Linking genes, circuits, and behavior: Network connectivity as a novel endophenotype of externalizing. Psychological Medicine, 49(11), 1905-1913.
doi: 10.1017/S0033291718002672 pmid: 30207258 |
[51] |
Seamans, J. K., & Yang, C. R. (2004). The principal features and mechanisms of dopamine modulation in the prefrontal cortex. Progress in Neurobiology, 74(1), 1-58.
pmid: 15381316 |
[52] | Shanahan, M. J., & Hofer, S. M. (2005). Social context in gene-environment interactions: Retrospect and prospect. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60(1), 65-76. |
[53] |
Stocker, C. M., Masarik, A. S., Widaman, K. F., Reeb, B. T., Boardman, J. D., Smolen, A., ... Conger, K. J. (2017). Parenting and adolescents’ psychological adjustment: Longitudinal moderation by adolescents’ genetic sensitivity. Development and Psychopathology, 29(4), 1289-1304.
doi: 10.1017/S0954579416001310 pmid: 28027713 |
[54] | Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using Multivariate Statistics (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. |
[55] |
Thibodeau, E. L., Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (2015). Child maltreatment, impulsivity, and antisocial behavior in African-American children: Moderation effects from a cumulative dopaminergic gene index. Development and Psychopathology, 27(4 Pt 2), 1621-1636.
doi: 10.1017/S095457941500098X pmid: 26535948 |
[56] |
Tian, T., Qin, W., Liu, B., Jiang, T., & Yu, C. (2013). Functional connectivity in healthy subjects is nonlinearly modulated by the COMT and DRD2 polymorphisms in a functional system-dependent manner. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(44), 17519-17526.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2163-13.2013 pmid: 24174684 |
[57] |
Tielbeek, J. J., Al-Itejawi, Z., Zijlmans, J., Polderman, T. J., Buckholtz, J. W., & Popma, A. (2018). The impact of chronic stress during adolescence on the development of aggressive behavior: A systematic review on the role of the dopaminergic system in rodents. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 91, 187-197.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.10.009 URL |
[58] |
Tomlinson, R. C., Hyde, L. W., Dotterer, H. L., Klump, K. L., & Burt, S. A. (2022). Parenting moderates the etiology of callous-unemotional traits in middle childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63(8), 912-920.
doi: 10.1111/jcpp.v63.8 URL |
[59] |
Toth, B. (2022). Differential dopamine dynamics in adolescents and adults. Journal of Neuroscience, 42(14), 2853-2855.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2492-21.2022 pmid: 35387880 |
[60] |
Tottenham, N., & Galván, A. (2016). Stress and the adolescent brain: Amygdala-prefrontal cortex circuitry and ventral striatum as developmental targets. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 70, 217-227.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.030 URL |
[61] |
Tunbridge, E. M., Harrison, P. J., & Weinberger, D. R. (2006). Catechol-O-methyltransferase, cognition, and psychosis: Val158 Met and beyond. Biological Psychiatry, 60(2), 141-151.
pmid: 16476412 |
[62] |
van Goozen, S. H. M., Langley, K., Northover, C., Hubble, K., Rubia, K., Schepman, K., ... Thapar, A. (2016). Identifying mechanisms that underlie links between COMT genotype and aggression in male adolescents with ADHD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(4), 472-480.
doi: 10.1111/jcpp.2016.57.issue-4 URL |
[63] | Vrantsidis, D. M., Clark, C. A., Volk, A., Wakschlag, L. S., Espy, K. A., & Wiebe, S. A. (2021). Exploring the interplay of dopaminergic genotype and parental behavior in relation to executive function in early childhood. Development and Psychopathology, Advanced online publication. |
[64] |
Wang, F. M., Chen, J. Q., Xiao, W. Q., Ma, Y. T., & Zhang, M. (2012). Peer physical aggression and its association with aggressive beliefs, empathy, self-control, and cooperation skills among students in a rural town of China. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(16), 3252-3267.
doi: 10.1177/0886260512441256 pmid: 22585113 |
[65] |
Xing, Q., Qian, X., Li, H., Wong, S., Wu, S., Feng, G., ... He, L. (2007). The relationship between the therapeutic response to risperidone and the dopamine D2 receptor polymorphism in Chinese schizophrenia patients. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 10(5), 631-637.
doi: 10.1017/S146114570600719X pmid: 17105675 |
[66] |
Yamaguchi, T., & Lin, D. (2018). Functions of medial hypothalamic and mesolimbic dopamine circuitries in aggression. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 24, 104-112.
doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.06.011 pmid: 30746430 |
[67] | Yu, C., Zhang, J., Zuo, X., Lian, Q., Tu, X., & Lou, C. (2021). Correlations of impulsivity and aggressive behaviours among adolescents in Shanghai, China using bioecological model: Cross-sectional data from Global Early Adolescent Study. BMJ Open, 11(7), e043785. |
[68] |
Zai, C. C., Ehtesham, S., Choi, E., Nowrouzi, B., de Luca, V., Stankovich, L., ... Beitchman, J. H. (2012). Dopaminergic system genes in childhood aggression: Possible role for DRD2. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 13(1), 65-74.
doi: 10.3109/15622975.2010.543431 pmid: 21247255 |
[69] | Zhang, J. P., & Malhotra, A. K. (2011). Pharmacogenetics and antipsychotics: Therapeutic efficacy and side effects prediction. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology, 7(1), 9-37. |
[70] |
Zhang, W., Cao, C., Wang, M., Ji, L., & Cao, Y. (2016). Monoamine oxidase a (MAOA) and catechol-O- methyltransferase (COMT) gene polymorphisms interact with maternal parenting in association with adolescent reactive aggression but not proactive aggression: Evidence of differential susceptibility. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 812-829.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0442-1 URL |
[71] |
Zhang, W., Cao, Y., Wang, M., Ji, L., Chen, L., & Deater- Deckard, K. (2015). The dopamine D2 receptor polymorphism (DRD2 TaqIA) interacts with maternal parenting in predicting early adolescent depressive symptoms: Evidence of differential susceptibility and age differences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(7), 1428-1440.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0297-x pmid: 25941120 |
[72] |
Zhang, W. X., Li, X., Chen, G. H., & Cao, Y. M. (2021). The relationship between positive parenting and adolescent prosocial behaviour: The mediating role of empathy and the moderating role of the oxytocin receptor gene. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(9), 976-991.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00976 URL |
[张文新, 李曦, 陈光辉, 曹衍淼. (2021). 母亲积极教养与青少年亲社会行为: 共情的中介作用与OXTR基因的调节作用. 心理学报, 53(9), 976-991.] | |
[73] |
Zhang, W. X., Wei, X., Ji, L. Q., Chen, L., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2017). Reconsidering parenting in Chinese culture: Subtypes, stability, and change of maternal parenting style during early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(5), 1117-1136.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0664-x pmid: 28357678 |
[1] | 靳娟娟, 邵蕾, 黄潇潇, 张亚利, 俞国良. 社会排斥与攻击的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(12): 1979-1996. |
[2] | 田相娟, 曹衍淼, 张文新. 母亲消极教养、同伴侵害与FKBP5基因对青少年抑郁的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(12): 1407-1420. |
[3] | 任志洪, 赵子仪, 余香莲, 赵春晓, 张琳, 林羽中, 张微. 睾酮素与反社会倾向未成年犯的攻击行为:敌意注意偏向的中介和皮质醇的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(11): 1288-1300. |
[4] | 黄潇潇, 张宝山, 张媛, 麻雨婷. 元刻板印象对随迁儿童攻击行为的效应及挫折感的中介作用 *[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(4): 484-496. |
[5] | 金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 乌云特娜, 金祥忠. 暴力环境接触对大学生网络攻击行为的影响:反刍思维与网络道德的作用 *[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 1051-1060. |
[6] | 侯璐璐, 江琦, 王焕贞, 李长燃. 特质愤怒对攻击行为的影响: 基于综合认知模型的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(12): 1548-1558. |
[7] | 张林;刘燊;徐强;吴晓燕;杨梦圆. 日常环境中的暴力暴露对攻击行为的长期影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(1): 50-59. |
[8] | 于海波;郑晓明;许春燕;晏常丽. 大学生可就业能力与主客观就业绩效:线性与倒U型关系[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(6): 807-822. |
[9] | 王美萍,张文新. COMT基因rs6267多态性与青少年攻击行为的关系:性别与负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2010, 42(11): 1073-1081. |
[10] | 王振宏,郭德俊,游旭群,高培霞. 身体攻击行为学生自主神经活动的情绪唤醒特点[J]. 心理学报, 2007, 39(2): 277-284. |
[11] | 雷雳,王燕,郭伯良,张雷. 班级行为范式对个体行为与受欺负关系影响的多层分析[J]. 心理学报, 2004, 36(05): 563-567. |
[12] | 隋南,陈晶. 药物成瘾行为的脑机制及其研究进展[J]. 心理学报, 2000, 32(2): 235-240. |
[13] | 张倩,郭念锋. 攻击行为儿童大脑半球某些认知特点的研究[J]. 心理学报, 1999, 31(1): 104-110. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||