心理科学进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 108-115.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.00108 cstr: 32111.14.2023.00108
收稿日期:
2020-09-15
出版日期:
2023-01-15
发布日期:
2022-10-13
Received:
2020-09-15
Online:
2023-01-15
Published:
2022-10-13
摘要:
高权力还是低权力的个体更能准确地理解他人的想法和感受?这个问题在人际关系研究领域没有定论。长期以来研究者认为, 高权力者的人际敏感性要弱于低权力者, 但近年来这一观点受到很多的质疑。研究发现, 在特定情况下, 高权力者的人际敏感性可能强于低权力者。虽然目前为止两种“矛盾”的观点都有各自相应的实证结论, 但缺乏理论上的系统解释。通过对当前权力与人际敏感性关系的争议进行梳理, 并以权力对认知的影响为基础, 结合权力通过情绪和动机的作用, 整合形成权力的影响机制, 不仅可以在一定程度上诠释已有的“矛盾”观点, 还可以由此明确未来从个人因素和社会因素出发进一步深入研究两者关系的方向。
中图分类号:
寇东晓, 王晓玉. (2023). 权力对人际敏感性的影响. 心理科学进展 , 31(1), 108-115.
KOU Dongxiao, WANG Xiaoyu. (2023). The influence of power on interpersonal sensitivity. Advances in Psychological Science, 31(1), 108-115.
[1] | Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 83(6), 1362-1377. |
[2] |
Boksem, M. A., Smolders, R., & De Cremer, D. (2012). Social power and approach-related neural activity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(5), 516-520.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsp006 pmid: 19304842 |
[3] |
Chepenik, L. G., Cornew, L. A., & Farah, M. J. (2007). The influence of sad mood on cognition. Emotion, 7(4), 802-811.
pmid: 18039049 |
[4] |
Côté, S., Kraus, M. W., Cheng, B. H., Oveis, C., van der Löwe, I., Lian, H. … Keltner, D.. (2011). Social power facilitates the effect of prosocial orientation on empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 217-232.
doi: 10.1037/a0023171 pmid: 21463075 |
[5] | Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48(6), 621. |
[6] |
Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300-319.
doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300 pmid: 21850154 |
[7] |
Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1068-1074.
pmid: 17201789 |
[8] | Gonzaga, G. C., Keltner, D., & Ward, D. (2008). Power in mixed-sex stranger interactions. Cognition & Emotion, 22, 1555-1568. |
[9] |
Gordon, A. M., & Chen, S. (2013). Does power help or hurt? The moderating role of self-other focus on power and perspective-taking in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(8), 1097-1110.
doi: 10.1177/0146167213490031 pmid: 23748962 |
[10] |
Gruenfeld, D. H, Inesi, M. E., Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 111-127.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.111 pmid: 18605855 |
[11] |
Guinote, A. (2007a). Behaviour variability and the situated focus theory of power. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 256-295.
doi: 10.1080/10463280701692813 URL |
[12] |
Guinote, A. (2007b). Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(5), 685-697.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.06.008 URL |
[13] |
Guinote, A. (2017). How Power Affects People: Activating, Wanting, and Goal Seeking. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 353-381.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044153 URL |
[14] |
Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A., Mast,& M.S. (2006). Recall of nonverbal cues: Exploring a new definition of interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30(4), 141-155.
doi: 10.1007/s10919-006-0013-3 URL |
[15] |
Hildreth, J. A. D., & Anderson, C. (2016). Failure at the top: How power undermines collaborative performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(2), 261-286.
doi: 10.1037/pspi0000045 pmid: 26785063 |
[16] | Isen, A. M. (1987). Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 203-253. |
[17] |
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265-284.
pmid: 12747524 |
[18] |
Kossowska, M., Guinote, A., & Strojny, P. (2016). Power boosts reliance on preferred processing styles. Motivation and Emotion, 40(4), 556-565.
doi: 10.1007/s11031-016-9548-8 URL |
[19] |
Laurin, K., Fitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., Carswell, K. L., vanDellen, M. R., Hofmann, W., & Brown, P. C. (2016). Power and the pursuit of a partner’s goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(6), 840-868.
doi: 10.1037/pspi0000048 URL |
[20] |
Leach, S., & Weick, M. (2018). From grumpy to cheerful (and back): How power impacts mood in and across different contexts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 107-114.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.004 URL |
[21] |
Li, X., Liu, P., Xiao, C., Wang, X., & Li, A. (2020). How does power in organizations promote prosocial behavior? The mediating role of sense of responsibility. Advances in Psychological Science, 28(9), 1586-1598.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.01586 URL |
[22] | Ma, X., Wu, K., & Zhang, E. (2019). The role of social power in neural responses to others’ pain. Frontiers in Psychology, 2320. |
[23] |
Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 158-186.
doi: 10.1177/1088868312472732 pmid: 23348983 |
[24] |
Overbeck, J. R., & Park, B. (2001). When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 549-565.
pmid: 11642345 |
[25] |
Paulmann, S., & Uskul, A. K. (2017). Early and late brain signatures of emotional prosody among individuals with high versus low power. Psychophysiology, 54(4), 555-565.
doi: 10.1111/psyp.12812 pmid: 28026863 |
[26] | Pril, D. M. A. (2017). Toward a better understanding of the interpersonal effects of power: Power decreases interpersonal sensitivity, but not toward people within the power relationship (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Köln, Universität zu Köln. |
[27] |
Quirin, M., Meyer, F., Heise, N., Kuhl, J., Küstermann, E., Strüber, D., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2013). Neural correlates of social motivation: An fMRI study on power versus affiliation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 88(3), 289-295.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.07.003 pmid: 22841755 |
[28] |
Schmid Mast, M., Jonas, K., & Hall, J. A. (2009). Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: The phenomenon and its why and when. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(5), 835-850.
doi: 10.1037/a0016234 pmid: 19857005 |
[29] |
Scholl, A., & Sassenberg, K. (2022). Opening up new avenues for research on social power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 52(3), 133-136.
doi: 10.1111/jasp.12858 URL |
[30] |
Scholl, A., Sassenberg, K., Scheepers, D., Ellemers, N., & de Wit, F. (2017). A matter of focus: Power-holders feel more responsible after adopting a cognitive other-focus, rather than a self-focus. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(1), 89-102.
doi: 10.1111/bjso.12177 pmid: 27900793 |
[31] |
Smith, P. K., & Trope, Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 578-596.
pmid: 16649856 |
[32] |
Smith, P. K., Wigboldus, D. H. J., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2008). Abstract thinking increases one’s sense of power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 378-385.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.12.005 URL |
[33] |
Sturm, R. E., & Antonakis, J. (2014). Interpersonal power. Journal of Management, 41(1), 136-163.
doi: 10.1177/0149206314555769 URL |
[34] |
Tost, L. P., & Johnson, H. H. (2019). The prosocial side of power: How structural power over subordinates can promote social responsibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 152, 25-46.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.04.004 URL |
[35] |
Trivers, R. L. (2017). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35-57.
doi: 10.1086/406755 URL |
[36] |
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463.
doi: 10.1037/a0018963 pmid: 20438233 |
[37] | Uskul, A. K., Paulmann, S., & Weick, M. (2016). Social power and recognition of emotional prosody: High power is associated with lower recognition accuracy than low power. Emotion, 16(1), 11. |
[38] |
van Kleef, G. A., & Lange, J. (2020). How hierarchy shapes our emotional lives: Effects of power and status on emotional experience, expression, and responsiveness. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 148-153.
doi: S2352-250X(19)30080-6 pmid: 31470224 |
[39] |
van Kleef, G. A., Oveis, C., Löwe, I. V. D., Luokogan, A., Goetz, J., & Keltner, D. (2008). Power, distress, and compassion: Turning a blind eye to the suffering of others. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1315-1322.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02241.x pmid: 19121143 |
[1] | 程晓荣, 仇式明, 定险峰, 范炤. 动作如何影响元认知?——基于认知模型和神经机制的探讨[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(3): 425-438. |
[2] | 巩芳颍, 孙逸梵, 贺琴, 石可, 刘伟, 陈宁. 教学互动中师生脑间同步性及其调节因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(3): 452-464. |
[3] | 郭艺, 张连成, 陶莹莹, 朱良昊, 王婷. BDNF是运动促进认知的生物学机制吗?证据、挑战与展望[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(3): 465-476. |
[4] | 夏熠, 张婕, 张火垠, 雷怡, 窦皓然. 焦虑个体趋避冲突失调的认知神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(3): 477-493. |
[5] | 肖瑶, 王雪珂, 冯廷勇. 人类为什么会拖延?基于多模态多组学视角的解读[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(3): 520-536. |
[6] | 高伟, 李艳萍, 黄悦媛, 袁加锦. 目标与情境转换对情绪调节灵活性的作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(2): 202-211. |
[7] | 周爱保, 袁月. 高功能孤独症自我加工的机制与干预[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(2): 212-222. |
[8] | 卫旭华, 焦文颖. 权力接近−抑制行为理论:基于元分析的理论拓展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(2): 274-290. |
[9] | 刘豫, 毕丹丹, 赵凯宾, 史怡明, Hanna Y. Adamseged, 晋争. 儿童挑食行为的认知机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(2): 305-321. |
[10] | 昌思琴, 黄辰, 戴元富, 蒋长好. VR训练对轻度认知障碍老年人认知功能的影响及神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(2): 322-335. |
[11] | 方霞, 潘之禾. 动态序列情境对面部表情知觉的影响和作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(1): 1-10. |
[12] | 吴际, 李会杰. 认知空间映射及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(1): 62-76. |
[13] | 温秀娟, 马毓璟, 谭斯祺, 李芸, 刘文华. 身体还是认知努力的损害?抑郁症努力奖赏动机评估及计算模型应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(1): 107-122. |
[14] | 李兴珊, 张淇玮, 黄林洁琼. 中文词汇语义加工过程的计算模拟与实验验证[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(9): 1379-1392. |
[15] | 贾云丞, 程刚, 丁芳媛, 陈加, 龙女, 陈玉荣, 林楠. 对中性婴儿面孔注意偏向与表情不确定性的关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(9): 1393-1407. |
阅读次数 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
全文 2609
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
摘要 1832
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||