ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 116-126.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.00116

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

死亡提醒对员工绩效的双刃效应:压力交互理论的视角

郑银波1, 李馨1(), 黄华东2, 李斌1, 李爱梅1()   

  1. 1暨南大学管理学院, 广州 510632
    2华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院, 上海 200062
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-06 出版日期:2023-01-15 发布日期:2022-10-13
  • 通讯作者: 李馨,李爱梅 E-mail:starli0813@foxmail.com;tliaim@jnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(71971099);广东省自然科学基金重大项目(2017A030308013);广东省普通高校人文社会科学重点研究基地暨南大学企业发展研究所重点项目(2021MYZD01);广东省社科规划基金一般项目(GD22CGL05);教育部人文社科研究青年基金项目(22YJCZH074)

The double-edged sword effect of mortality cues on employee performance: A perspective of transactional stress theory

ZHENG Yinbo1, LI Xin1(), HUANG Huadong2, LI Bin1, LI Aimei1()   

  1. 1School of Management, Jinan University, Guangdong 510632, China
    2School of Psychology and Cognitive School, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
  • Received:2022-03-06 Online:2023-01-15 Published:2022-10-13
  • Contact: LI Xin,LI Aimei E-mail:starli0813@foxmail.com;tliaim@jnu.edu.cn

摘要:

职场内外部死亡提醒对员工绩效具有双刃效应已得到诸多研究的支持, 但该现象背后的统一理论解释缺乏深入探讨。基于压力交互理论构建的模型指出, 死亡提醒通过压力源认知评估与状态死亡意识的链式中介影响员工绩效。具体而言, 员工对死亡提醒这一压力源的威胁性评估与挑战性评估分别影响其状态死亡焦虑与状态死亡反思, 进而对任务绩效、组织公民行为和反生产行为产生双刃效应。最后, 基于模型梳理了个体资源与情境资源等相关边界条件, 并提出未来可探析死亡提醒双刃效应的过程机制、边界条件以及组织干预策略。

关键词: 死亡提醒, 死亡焦虑, 死亡反思, 压力交互理论, 员工绩效

Abstract:

Mortality cues, ubiquitous inside and outside the workplace, are specific events and experiences that trigger individuals’ death awareness, whose double-edged effect on employee performance has been supported by a body of studies. Existing studies have explained this effect drawing on terror management theory and generativity theory. Studies from the perspective of terror management have indicated that individuals' death anxiety will induce their self-protection motivations, which in turn predicts their work withdrawal behaviors such as absenteeism, turnover, and so on. On the other hand, studies from the perspective of generativity theory have suggested that individuals will actively reflect on their long-term life meaning in the face of mortality cues, and generate prosocial motivations that motivate them to make profound contributions to society, which in turn promotes their positive work behaviors such as helping others in the workplace. However, given that some studies have found that death anxiety has a positive effect on employee performance, and each of the above perspectives focuses on explaining a single effect of mortality cues, previous studies still fail to provide an overarching theoretical explanation for the key question “how and when does mortality cues have a double-edged effect on employee performance?”. Building on the unified perspective of transactional stress theory, this current review systematically sorts out the double-edged effect of mortality cues on employee task performance, organizational behavior, and counterproductive behavior, then analyzes the psychological mechanism and boundary conditions of this double-edged effect. Specifically, mortality cues can be conceptualized as a stressor both impeding and facilitating individuals’ personal goals and well-being, and individual's different cognitive appraisal (i.e., threat-based vs. challenge-based) of mortality-cues-based stressors will produce differential state death awareness (i.e., state death anxiety vs. state death reflection) and work behaviors. When it comes to appraisals of mortality-cues-based stressors, the threat-based appraisal of mortality-cues-based stressors will hinder their task performance and organizational citizenship and cause counterproductive behavior via state death anxiety, and the challenge-based appraisal of mortality-cues-based stressors will facilitate employee’s task performance and organizational citizenship behavior via state death reflection. In addition, this double-edged effect is also moderated by personal resources such as trait death reflection, psychological power, trait mindfulness, and promotion focus, as well as organizational contextual factors such as servant leadership and internal corporate social responsibility. Both personal and organizational contextual resources will strengthen the positive relationship between mortality-cues-based stressors and the challenge-based appraisal of mortality-cues-based stressors, and weaken the positive relationship between mortality-cues-based stressors and the threat-based appraisal of mortality-cues-based stressors. Explaining the double-edged effect of mortality cues from the perspective of transactional stress theory has both theoretical and practical implications. In particular, the perspective of transactional stress theory not only captures the interaction between objective mortality cues and individuals’ subjective cognitive appraisals, but also provides an overarching explanation for the generation of different state death awareness and its subsequent double-edged effects on employee performance. The divergence between death anxiety and employee performance may also be clarified by the theoretical insight that cognitive appraisals of mortality-cues-based stressors are a dynamic process. Practitioners can also conduct some intervention programs based on the above theoretical framework to help employees cope with mortality cues more adaptively. Future research can further explore antecedents and causality in the mechanism of the double-edged effect of mortality cues, testing the theoretical validity of mortality cues as a new type of stressor and clarifying whether the generation of state death awareness depends on cognitive appraisals of mortality-cues-based stressors or not. In addition, future research can also examine whether there are boundary conditions related to cross-domain contextual resources such as family intimacy, and develop more organizational intervention programs ranging long-term mindfulness intervention to short-term nudge strategies.

Key words: mortality cues, death anxiety, death reflection, transactional stress theory, employee performance

中图分类号: