心理科学进展 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (7): 1179-1194.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.01179
收稿日期:
2020-08-21
出版日期:
2021-07-15
发布日期:
2021-05-24
基金资助:
ZHANG Wen1, HU Na2, DING Xuechen1,3(), LI Junyi4()
Received:
2020-08-21
Online:
2021-07-15
Published:
2021-05-24
摘要:
运用元分析法整合探究拒绝敏感性与边缘型人格特征关联的已有实证研究, 旨在分析两者间的关联, 并同时考察可能影响该关联的其他变量。经过文献检索和筛选, 共纳入符合要求的原始文献50篇, 含84个效应量, 总样本量为7400人。同质性检验结果表明, 纳入研究的异质性较高, 故进一步对各影响因素变量进行了亚样本及元回归分析。结果发现, 在不同研究设计类型、被试所处地、样本类型、边缘型人格特征指标、拒绝敏感性测量类型的亚样本下, 二者之间的关联存在一定差异, 其中在横向设计、其他地区样本、混合被试、整体边缘型人格特征、量表法测量时所得的拒绝敏感性与边缘型人格特征间的关联最强; 年龄与女性被试比例对该关联不存在显著影响。未来研究可通过纵向研究进一步揭示二者间的预测方向, 考察拒绝敏感性不同成分与边缘型人格特征间的关联, 并在国内开展探索二者关联的研究。
中图分类号:
张雯, 胡娜, 丁雪辰, 李俊一. (2021). 拒绝敏感性与边缘型人格特征的关联:一项元分析. 心理科学进展 , 29(7), 1179-1194.
ZHANG Wen, HU Na, DING Xuechen, LI Junyi. (2021). The relationship between rejection sensitivity and borderline personality features: A meta-analysis. Advances in Psychological Science, 29(7), 1179-1194.
作者+年份 | 被试量 | 研究 设计 | 被试 所处地 | 被试 类型 | 女性被试比例 | 年龄 M(SD) | 拒绝敏感性 测量工具 | BP特征 指标 | 相关 系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Armenti & Babcock, | 218 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 51.8 | 22.98 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.380 |
Ayduk et al., | 379 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 64.6 | 21.21 (3.57) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.290 |
Ayduk et al., | 104 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 63.5 | 38.88 (2.01) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.430 |
Beeney et al., | 44 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 100 | 29.90 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.455 |
Beeney et al., | 36 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 100 | 31.94 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.143 |
Berenson et al., | 87 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 79.3 | 22.74 (5.57) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.420 |
Berenson et al., | 85 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 76.5 | 33.50 (10.20) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.681 |
Berenson et al., | 80 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 76.3 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.644 |
Berenson et al., | 59 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 72.9 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.133 |
Berenson et al., | 73 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 80.6 | 19.40 (1.32) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.396 |
Berlingo, | 344 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 72.4 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.341 |
Boldero et al., | 101 | 横向 | 其他 | 健康 | 70.3 | 20.64 (4.55) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.630 |
Boldero et al., | 131 | 横向 | 其他 | 健康 | 71 | 20.10 (4.37) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.450 |
Brown, | 206 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | / | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.207 |
Bungert, Koppe, et al., | 40 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 28.95 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.732 |
Bungert, Liebke, et al., | 152 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 27.56 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.760 |
Bungert, Liebke, et al., | 90 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 27.30 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.589 |
Bungert, Liebke, et al., | 77 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 28.30 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.300 |
Bungert, Liebke, et al., | 15 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 29.20 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.620 |
Chesin et al., | 85 | 横向 | 北美 | 临床 | 87.1 | 31.96 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.335 |
de Panfilis et al., | 596 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 75.4 | 21.20 (5.30) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.110 |
de Panfilis et al., | 596 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 75.4 | 21.20 (5.30) | 问卷 | 行为 | -0.200 |
de Panfilis et al., | 562 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 59.3 | 33.70 (11.50) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.230 |
de Panfilis et al., | 562 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 59.3 | 33.70 (11.50) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.430 |
de Panfilis et al., | 562 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 59.3 | 33.70 (11.50) | 问卷 | 行为 | -0.360 |
de Panfilis et al., | 562 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 59.3 | 33.70 (11.50) | 问卷 | 行为 | -0.480 |
Dixon-Gordon et al., | 68 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 100 | 21.68 (5.20) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.630 |
Domsalla et al., | 40 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 28.95 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.732 |
Erbe, | 29 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 100 | 25.42 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.677 |
Euler et al., | 65 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 临床 | 76.9 | 29.40 (9.20) | 问卷 | 自我形象 | 0.420 |
Fertuck et al., | 36 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 72.2 | 30.33 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.493 |
Gardner et al., | 150 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 70 | 26.40 (10.15) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.470 |
Goodman et al., | 133 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 67 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.230 |
Goodman et al., | 133 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 67 | /(/) | 问卷 | 情绪 | 0.370 |
Gutz et al., | 50 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 88 | 26.50 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.330 |
Gutz et al., | 50 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 90 | 25.50 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.692 |
Jobst et al., | 39 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.805 |
Jobst et al., | 39 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 30.13 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.805 |
Koster et al., | 111 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 0 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.450 |
Koster et al., | 144 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 100 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.420 |
Lazarus et al., | 127 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 100 | 19.57 (2.50) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.260 |
Lazarus et al., | 101 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 76 | 30.00 (5.87) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.300 |
Liebke et al., | 56 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 27.13 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.757 |
Masland, | 77 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 72.7 | 31.53 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.510 |
Masland, | 77 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 72.7 | 31.53 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.400 |
Masland, | 77 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 72.7 | 31.53 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.344 |
Meyer et al., | 156 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 72 | 30.20 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.210 |
Meyer et al., | 156 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 72 | 30.20 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.320 |
Miano et al., | 95 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 69 | 19.80 (2.95) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.190 |
Miano et al., | 95 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 69 | 19.80 (2.95) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.140 |
Miano et al., | 95 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 69 | 19.80 (2.95) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.120 |
Peters et al., | 411 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 68 | 19.80 (2.09) | 问卷 | 情绪 | 0.450 |
Peters et al., | 411 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 68 | 19.80 (2.09) | 问卷 | 人际关系 | 0.410 |
Peters et al., | 411 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 68 | 19.80 (2.09) | 问卷 | 自我形象 | 0.450 |
Peters et al., | 411 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 68 | 19.80 (2.09) | 问卷 | 行为 | 0.220 |
Renneberg et al., | 30 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 86.7 | 28.92 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | -0.355 |
Renneberg et al., | 30 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 86.7 | 28.92 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | 0.043 |
Renneberg et al., | 30 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 86.7 | 28.92 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | 0.036 |
Rosenbach & Renneberg, | 193 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 79.3 | 25.00 (5.40) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.530 |
Rosenbach & Renneberg, | 57 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 80.7 | 35.76 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.414 |
Rosenbach & Renneberg, | 60 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 83.3 | 31.75 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.686 |
Sato et al., | 256 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 67.2 | 23.77 (6.67) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.390 |
Sato et al., | 256 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 67.2 | 23.77 (6.67) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.390 |
Seidl et al., | 63 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 64.2 | 40.39 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | -0.043 |
Seidl et al., | 63 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 64.2 | 40.39 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | -0.046 |
Selby et al., | 94 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 78.7 | 18.75 (1.05) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.440 |
Shorey et al., | 98 | 横向 | 北美 | 临床 | 0 | 38.89 (10.60) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.510 |
Skinner, | 147 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 76.9 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.210 |
Sommerfeld & Bitton, | 60 | 横向 | 其他 | 混合 | 60 | 26.41 (6.18) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.720 |
Sommerfeld & Bitton, | 60 | 横向 | 其他 | 混合 | 60 | 26.41 (6.18) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.498 |
Staebler et al., | 26 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 27.27 (7.69) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.320 |
Staebler et al., | 145 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 69.8 | 34.85 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.546 |
Staebler et al., | 102 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 94.1 | 28.81 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.857 |
Strimpfel, | 55 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 49.1 | 15.48 (1.21) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.250 |
Strimpfel, | 55 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 49.1 | 15.48 (1.21) | 问卷 | 情绪 | 0.200 |
Strimpfel, | 55 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 49.1 | 15.48 (1.21) | 问卷 | 人际关系 | 0.470 |
Strimpfel, | 55 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 49.1 | 15.48 (1.21) | 问卷 | 自我形象 | 0.220 |
Strimpfel, | 55 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 49.1 | 15.48 (1.21) | 问卷 | 行为 | -0.050 |
Thome et al., | 72 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 26.70 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.786 |
Tragesser et al., | 121 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 68.6 | 19.17 (1.78) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.340 |
Winter et al., | 60 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 26.12 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.716 |
Winter et al., | 60 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 26.12 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.716 |
Wrege et al., | 68 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 80.9 | 26.73 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | 0.168 |
Zielinski & Veilleux, | 165 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 64.2 | 19.09 (1.14) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.280 |
表1 纳入元分析的原始研究基本信息
作者+年份 | 被试量 | 研究 设计 | 被试 所处地 | 被试 类型 | 女性被试比例 | 年龄 M(SD) | 拒绝敏感性 测量工具 | BP特征 指标 | 相关 系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Armenti & Babcock, | 218 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 51.8 | 22.98 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.380 |
Ayduk et al., | 379 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 64.6 | 21.21 (3.57) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.290 |
Ayduk et al., | 104 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 63.5 | 38.88 (2.01) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.430 |
Beeney et al., | 44 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 100 | 29.90 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.455 |
Beeney et al., | 36 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 100 | 31.94 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.143 |
Berenson et al., | 87 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 79.3 | 22.74 (5.57) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.420 |
Berenson et al., | 85 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 76.5 | 33.50 (10.20) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.681 |
Berenson et al., | 80 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 76.3 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.644 |
Berenson et al., | 59 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 72.9 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.133 |
Berenson et al., | 73 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 80.6 | 19.40 (1.32) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.396 |
Berlingo, | 344 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 72.4 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.341 |
Boldero et al., | 101 | 横向 | 其他 | 健康 | 70.3 | 20.64 (4.55) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.630 |
Boldero et al., | 131 | 横向 | 其他 | 健康 | 71 | 20.10 (4.37) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.450 |
Brown, | 206 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | / | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.207 |
Bungert, Koppe, et al., | 40 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 28.95 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.732 |
Bungert, Liebke, et al., | 152 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 27.56 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.760 |
Bungert, Liebke, et al., | 90 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 27.30 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.589 |
Bungert, Liebke, et al., | 77 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 28.30 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.300 |
Bungert, Liebke, et al., | 15 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 29.20 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.620 |
Chesin et al., | 85 | 横向 | 北美 | 临床 | 87.1 | 31.96 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.335 |
de Panfilis et al., | 596 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 75.4 | 21.20 (5.30) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.110 |
de Panfilis et al., | 596 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 75.4 | 21.20 (5.30) | 问卷 | 行为 | -0.200 |
de Panfilis et al., | 562 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 59.3 | 33.70 (11.50) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.230 |
de Panfilis et al., | 562 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 59.3 | 33.70 (11.50) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.430 |
de Panfilis et al., | 562 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 59.3 | 33.70 (11.50) | 问卷 | 行为 | -0.360 |
de Panfilis et al., | 562 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 59.3 | 33.70 (11.50) | 问卷 | 行为 | -0.480 |
Dixon-Gordon et al., | 68 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 100 | 21.68 (5.20) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.630 |
Domsalla et al., | 40 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 28.95 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.732 |
Erbe, | 29 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 100 | 25.42 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.677 |
Euler et al., | 65 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 临床 | 76.9 | 29.40 (9.20) | 问卷 | 自我形象 | 0.420 |
Fertuck et al., | 36 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 72.2 | 30.33 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.493 |
Gardner et al., | 150 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 70 | 26.40 (10.15) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.470 |
Goodman et al., | 133 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 67 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.230 |
Goodman et al., | 133 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 67 | /(/) | 问卷 | 情绪 | 0.370 |
Gutz et al., | 50 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 88 | 26.50 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.330 |
Gutz et al., | 50 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 90 | 25.50 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.692 |
Jobst et al., | 39 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.805 |
Jobst et al., | 39 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 30.13 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.805 |
Koster et al., | 111 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 0 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.450 |
Koster et al., | 144 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 100 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.420 |
Lazarus et al., | 127 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 100 | 19.57 (2.50) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.260 |
Lazarus et al., | 101 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 76 | 30.00 (5.87) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.300 |
Liebke et al., | 56 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 27.13 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.757 |
Masland, | 77 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 72.7 | 31.53 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.510 |
Masland, | 77 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 72.7 | 31.53 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.400 |
Masland, | 77 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 72.7 | 31.53 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.344 |
Meyer et al., | 156 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 72 | 30.20 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.210 |
Meyer et al., | 156 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 72 | 30.20 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.320 |
Miano et al., | 95 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 69 | 19.80 (2.95) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.190 |
Miano et al., | 95 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 69 | 19.80 (2.95) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.140 |
Miano et al., | 95 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 69 | 19.80 (2.95) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.120 |
Peters et al., | 411 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 68 | 19.80 (2.09) | 问卷 | 情绪 | 0.450 |
Peters et al., | 411 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 68 | 19.80 (2.09) | 问卷 | 人际关系 | 0.410 |
Peters et al., | 411 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 68 | 19.80 (2.09) | 问卷 | 自我形象 | 0.450 |
Peters et al., | 411 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 68 | 19.80 (2.09) | 问卷 | 行为 | 0.220 |
Renneberg et al., | 30 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 86.7 | 28.92 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | -0.355 |
Renneberg et al., | 30 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 86.7 | 28.92 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | 0.043 |
Renneberg et al., | 30 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 86.7 | 28.92 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | 0.036 |
Rosenbach & Renneberg, | 193 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 79.3 | 25.00 (5.40) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.530 |
Rosenbach & Renneberg, | 57 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 80.7 | 35.76 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.414 |
Rosenbach & Renneberg, | 60 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 83.3 | 31.75 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.686 |
Sato et al., | 256 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 67.2 | 23.77 (6.67) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.390 |
Sato et al., | 256 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 67.2 | 23.77 (6.67) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.390 |
Seidl et al., | 63 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 64.2 | 40.39 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | -0.043 |
Seidl et al., | 63 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 64.2 | 40.39 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | -0.046 |
Selby et al., | 94 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 78.7 | 18.75 (1.05) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.440 |
Shorey et al., | 98 | 横向 | 北美 | 临床 | 0 | 38.89 (10.60) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.510 |
Skinner, | 147 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 76.9 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.210 |
Sommerfeld & Bitton, | 60 | 横向 | 其他 | 混合 | 60 | 26.41 (6.18) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.720 |
Sommerfeld & Bitton, | 60 | 横向 | 其他 | 混合 | 60 | 26.41 (6.18) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.498 |
Staebler et al., | 26 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 27.27 (7.69) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.320 |
Staebler et al., | 145 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 69.8 | 34.85 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.546 |
Staebler et al., | 102 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 94.1 | 28.81 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.857 |
Strimpfel, | 55 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 49.1 | 15.48 (1.21) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.250 |
Strimpfel, | 55 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 49.1 | 15.48 (1.21) | 问卷 | 情绪 | 0.200 |
Strimpfel, | 55 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 49.1 | 15.48 (1.21) | 问卷 | 人际关系 | 0.470 |
Strimpfel, | 55 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 49.1 | 15.48 (1.21) | 问卷 | 自我形象 | 0.220 |
Strimpfel, | 55 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 49.1 | 15.48 (1.21) | 问卷 | 行为 | -0.050 |
Thome et al., | 72 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 26.70 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.786 |
Tragesser et al., | 121 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 68.6 | 19.17 (1.78) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.340 |
Winter et al., | 60 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 26.12 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.716 |
Winter et al., | 60 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 26.12 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.716 |
Wrege et al., | 68 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 80.9 | 26.73 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | 0.168 |
Zielinski & Veilleux, | 165 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 64.2 | 19.09 (1.14) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.280 |
变量 | 类别 | 独立样本 | 效应值及95%置信区间 | 双侧检验 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
点估计 | 下限 | 上限 | Z | p | |||
研究设计 | 横向 | 78 | 0.41 | 0.34 | 0.48 | 10.37 | 0.000 |
实验 | 6 | 0.32 | -0.14 | 0.67 | 1.38 | 0.169 | |
被试所处地 | 欧美 | 80 | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.47 | 9.86 | 0.000 |
其他 | 4 | 0.58 | 0.44 | 0.69 | 7.06 | 0.000 | |
样本类型 | 临床 | 3 | 0.43 | 0.32 | 0.53 | 6.94 | 0.000 |
健康 | 42 | 0.29 | 0.20 | 0.38 | 6.08 | 0.000 | |
混合 | 39 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 0.61 | 9.65 | 0.000 | |
BP特征 指标 | 整体 | 71 | 0.45 | 0.39 | 0.50 | 13.82 | 0.000 |
情绪 | 3 | 0.38 | 0.26 | 0.49 | 5.71 | 0.000 | |
人际 | 2 | 0.42 | 0.34 | 0.49 | 9.52 | 0.000 | |
自我 | 3 | 0.40 | 0.28 | 0.51 | 6.06 | 0.000 | |
行为 | 5 | -0.19 | -0.43 | 0.07 | -1.42 | 0.157 | |
拒绝敏感性的 测量类型 | 量表 | 78 | 0.43 | 0.36 | 0.50 | 10.80 | 0.000 |
行为实验 | 6 | -0.02 | -0.15 | 0.12 | -0.26 | 0.795 |
表2 亚样本分析结果
变量 | 类别 | 独立样本 | 效应值及95%置信区间 | 双侧检验 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
点估计 | 下限 | 上限 | Z | p | |||
研究设计 | 横向 | 78 | 0.41 | 0.34 | 0.48 | 10.37 | 0.000 |
实验 | 6 | 0.32 | -0.14 | 0.67 | 1.38 | 0.169 | |
被试所处地 | 欧美 | 80 | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.47 | 9.86 | 0.000 |
其他 | 4 | 0.58 | 0.44 | 0.69 | 7.06 | 0.000 | |
样本类型 | 临床 | 3 | 0.43 | 0.32 | 0.53 | 6.94 | 0.000 |
健康 | 42 | 0.29 | 0.20 | 0.38 | 6.08 | 0.000 | |
混合 | 39 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 0.61 | 9.65 | 0.000 | |
BP特征 指标 | 整体 | 71 | 0.45 | 0.39 | 0.50 | 13.82 | 0.000 |
情绪 | 3 | 0.38 | 0.26 | 0.49 | 5.71 | 0.000 | |
人际 | 2 | 0.42 | 0.34 | 0.49 | 9.52 | 0.000 | |
自我 | 3 | 0.40 | 0.28 | 0.51 | 6.06 | 0.000 | |
行为 | 5 | -0.19 | -0.43 | 0.07 | -1.42 | 0.157 | |
拒绝敏感性的 测量类型 | 量表 | 78 | 0.43 | 0.36 | 0.50 | 10.80 | 0.000 |
行为实验 | 6 | -0.02 | -0.15 | 0.12 | -0.26 | 0.795 |
亚样本 | 变量 | b | SE | 下限 | 上限 | Z | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
横向设计 | 年龄(M) | 0.01 | 0.01 | -0.02 | 0.04 | 0.78 | 0.437 |
年龄(SD) | -0.02 | 0.03 | -0.07 | 0.03 | -0.91 | 0.362 | |
女性被试比例 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.00 | 0.01 | 0.50 | 0.620 | |
欧美地区 | 年龄(M) | 0.01 | 0.01 | -0.02 | 0.04 | 0.89 | 0.374 |
年龄(SD) | -0.03 | 0.03 | -0.08 | 0.02 | -1.04 | 0.297 | |
女性被试比例 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.00 | 0.01 | 0.61 | 0.545 | |
整体 BP特征 | 年龄(M) | 0.01 | 0.01 | -0.01 | 0.02 | 0.55 | 0.580 |
年龄(SD) | 0.01 | 0.02 | -0.03 | 0.04 | 0.33 | 0.741 | |
女性被试比例 | -0.00 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.00 | -0.21 | 0.830 | |
量表法 | 年龄(M) | 0.01 | 0.01 | -0.02 | 0.04 | 0.78 | 0.437 |
年龄(SD) | -0.02 | 0.03 | -0.07 | 0.03 | -0.91 | 0.362 | |
女性被试比例 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.00 | 0.01 | 0.50 | 0.620 |
表3 元回归分析结果
亚样本 | 变量 | b | SE | 下限 | 上限 | Z | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
横向设计 | 年龄(M) | 0.01 | 0.01 | -0.02 | 0.04 | 0.78 | 0.437 |
年龄(SD) | -0.02 | 0.03 | -0.07 | 0.03 | -0.91 | 0.362 | |
女性被试比例 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.00 | 0.01 | 0.50 | 0.620 | |
欧美地区 | 年龄(M) | 0.01 | 0.01 | -0.02 | 0.04 | 0.89 | 0.374 |
年龄(SD) | -0.03 | 0.03 | -0.08 | 0.02 | -1.04 | 0.297 | |
女性被试比例 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.00 | 0.01 | 0.61 | 0.545 | |
整体 BP特征 | 年龄(M) | 0.01 | 0.01 | -0.01 | 0.02 | 0.55 | 0.580 |
年龄(SD) | 0.01 | 0.02 | -0.03 | 0.04 | 0.33 | 0.741 | |
女性被试比例 | -0.00 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.00 | -0.21 | 0.830 | |
量表法 | 年龄(M) | 0.01 | 0.01 | -0.02 | 0.04 | 0.78 | 0.437 |
年龄(SD) | -0.02 | 0.03 | -0.07 | 0.03 | -0.91 | 0.362 | |
女性被试比例 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.00 | 0.01 | 0.50 | 0.620 |
(*表示元分析所纳入的文献) | |
[1] | 丁雪辰, 张田, 邓欣媚, 桑标, 方力, 程琛. (2015). “孤芳自赏”还是“茕茕孑立”:儿童社交淡漠适应功能的文化差异. 心理科学进展, 23(3), 439-447. |
[2] | 郭菲, 雷雳. (2006). 青少年假想观众和个人神话观念的研究述评. 心理科学进展, 14(6), 873-879. |
[3] | 马原啸, 陈旭. (2019). 非安全依恋可塑性的神经机制. 心理科学进展, 27(12), 1967-1979. |
[4] | 邵嵘, 滕召军, 刘衍玲. (2019). 暴力视频游戏对个体亲社会性的影响:一项元分析. 心理科学进展, 27(3), 453-464. |
[5] | 张雯, 周同, 丁雪辰, 周楠. (2020). 儿童拒绝敏感性与自我知觉的关系:一项交叉滞后研究. 心理发展与教育, 36(6), 649-658. |
[6] | 张亚利, 李森, 俞国良. (2019). 自尊与社交焦虑的关系:基于中国学生群体的元分析. 心理科学进展, 27(6), 1005-1018. |
[7] | 张英俊, 樊富珉, 张逸梅. (2017). 高边缘性人格障碍特质者负性沉浸的自我反思倾向. 心理科学, 40(5), 173-179. |
[8] | 郑沁怡, 丁雪辰, 刘影, 万旋傲, 桑标. (2019). 儿童社交自我知觉与抑郁感的关系:拒绝敏感性的中介作用与情绪调节能力的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 27(5), 894-899. |
[9] | 郑沁怡, 胡娜, 丁雪辰. (2020). 拒绝敏感性的影响因素——基于“个人×环境模型”. 应用心理学, 26(1), 83-96. |
[10] | American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association. |
[11] | * Armenti, N. A., & Babcock, J. C. (2018). Borderline personality features, anger, and intimate partner violence: An experimental manipulation of rejection. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(5-6), NP3104-NP3129. |
[12] |
* Ayduk, Ö., Zayas, V., Downey, G., Cole, A. B., Shoda, Y., & Mischel, W. (2008). Rejection sensitivity and executive control: Joint predictors of borderline personality features. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(1), 151-168.
doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.04.002 URL |
[13] |
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
pmid: 7777651 |
[14] | Beeney, J. E., Hallquist, M. N., Clifton, A. D., Lazarus, S. A., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2018). Social disadvantage and borderline personality disorder: A study of social networks. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(1), 62-72. |
[15] | * Beeney, J. E., Levy, K. N., Gatzke-Kopp, L. M., & Hallquist, M. N. (2014). EEG asymmetry in borderline personality disorder and depression following rejection. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5(2), 178-185. |
[16] |
* Berenson, K. R., Downey, G., Rafaeli, E., Coifman, K. G., & Paquin, N. L. (2011). The rejection-rage contingency in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(3), 681-690.
doi: 10.1037/a0023335 pmid: 21500875 |
[17] |
* Berenson, K. R., Gregory, W. E., Glaser, E., Romirowsky, A., Rafaeli, E., Yang, X., & Downey, G. (2016). Impulsivity, rejection sensitivity, and reactions to stressors in borderline personality disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 40(4), 510-521.
pmid: 27616800 |
[18] |
* Berenson, K. R., Gyurak, A., Ayduk, O., Downey, G., Garner, M. J., Mogg, K., ... Pine, D. S. (2009). Rejection sensitivity and disruption of attention by social threat cues. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 1064-1072.
pmid: 20160869 |
[19] |
* Berenson, K. R., Nynaes, O. U. A., Wakschal, E. S., Kapner, L. M., & Sweeney, E. C. (2018). Attributions for rejection and acceptance in young adults with borderline and avoidant personality features. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 37(6), 431-452.
doi: 10.1521/jscp.2018.37.6.431 URL |
[20] | * Berlingo, M. T. (2015). Ostracism and rejection sensitivity: Are the sensitive really sensitive? (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Washington State University. |
[21] |
Bohus, M., Kleindienst, N., Limberger, M. F., Stieglitz, R. D., Domsalla, M., Chapman, A. L., ... Wolf, M. (2009). The short version of the Borderline Symptom List (BSL-23): Development and initial data on psychometric properties. Psychopathology, 42(1), 32-39.
doi: 10.1159/000173701 URL |
[22] |
* Boldero, J. M., Hulbert, C. A., Bloom, L., Cooper, J., Gilbert, F., Mooney, J. L., & Salinger, J. (2009). Rejection sensitivity and negative self-beliefs as mediators of associations between the number of borderline personality disorder features and self-reported adult attachment. Personality and Mental Health, 3(4), 248-262.
doi: 10.1002/pmh.v3:4 URL |
[23] |
Bondü, R., & Richter, P. (2016). Linking forms and functions of aggression in adults to justice and rejection sensitivity. Psychology of Violence, 6(2), 292-302.
doi: 10.1037/a0039200 URL |
[24] | Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Effect sizes based on means. In M. Borenstein, L.V. Hedges, J.P.T. Higgins, & H. R.Rothstein (Eds.), Introduction to meta-analysis (pp.21-32). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
[25] |
Bottesi, G., Tesini, V., Cerea, S., & Ghisi, M. (2018). Are difficulties in emotion regulation and intolerance of uncertainty related to negative affect in borderline personality disorder? Clinical Psychologist, 22(2), 137-147.
doi: 10.1111/cp.12163 URL |
[26] |
Brenchley, K. J. M., & Quinn, D. M. (2016). Weight-based rejection sensitivity: Scale development and implications for well-being. Body Image, 16, 79-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.11.005 pmid: 26760247 |
[27] | * Brown, W. C. (2014). Borderline features, rejection sensitivity, and romantic relationships: A daily diary study of romantic partners (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Missouri-Columbia. |
[28] |
* Bungert, M., Koppe, G., Niedtfeld, I., Vollstädt-Klein, S., Schmahl, C., Lis, S., & Bohus, M. (2015). Pain processing after social exclusion and its relation to rejection sensitivity in borderline personality disorder. PLoS ONE, 10(8), e0133693.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133693 URL |
[29] |
* Bungert, M., Liebke, L., Thome, J., Haeussler, K., Bohus, M., & Lis, S. (2015). Rejection sensitivity and symptom severity in patients with borderline personality disorder: Effects of childhood maltreatment and self-esteem. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 2(1), 4.
doi: 10.1186/s40479-015-0025-x URL |
[30] |
Carlson, E. M., Cox, D. W., Kealy, D., Chapman, A. L., & Ogrodniczuk, J. S. (2020). Social role dysfunction and coping in borderline personality disorder. Personality and Mental Health, 14(2), 227-239.
doi: 10.1002/pmh.1476 pmid: 32056384 |
[31] | Cavicchioli, M., & Maffei, C. (2019). Rejection sensitivity in borderline personality disorder and the cognitive-affective personality system: A meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11(1), 1-12. |
[32] |
Chango, J. M., McElhaney, K. B., Allen, J. P., Schad, M. M., & Marston, E. (2012). Relational stressors and depressive symptoms in late adolescence: Rejection sensitivity as a vulnerability. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40(3), 369-379.
doi: 10.1007/s10802-011-9570-y URL |
[33] |
Chen, X. Y., Fu, R., Liu, J. S., Wang, L., Zarbatany, L., & Ellis, W. (2018). Social sensitivity and social, school, and psychological adjustment among children across contexts. Developmental Psychology, 54(6), 1124-1134.
doi: 10.1037/dev0000496 URL |
[34] |
* Chesin, M., Fertuck, E., Goodman, J., Lichenstein, S., & Stanley, B. (2015). The interaction between rejection sensitivity and emotional maltreatment in borderline personality disorder. Psychopathology, 48(1), 31-35.
doi: 10.1159/000365196 pmid: 25277634 |
[35] |
Daros, A. R., Zakzanis, K. K., & Ruocco, A. C. (2013). Facial emotion recognition in borderline personality disorder. Psychological Medicine, 43(9), 1953-1963.
doi: 10.1017/S0033291712002607 pmid: 23149223 |
[36] |
* de Panfilis, C., Meehan, K. B., Cain, N. M., & Clarkin, J. F. (2016). Effortful control, rejection sensitivity, and borderline personality disorder features in adulthood. Journal of Personality Disorders, 30(5), 595-612.
doi: 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_226 URL |
[37] |
Ding, X. C., Fu, R., Ooi, L. L., Coplan, R. J., Zheng, Q. Y., & Deng, X. M. (2020). Relations between different components of rejection sensitivity and adjustment in Chinese children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 67, 101119.
doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101119 URL |
[38] |
* Dixon-Gordon, K. L., Yiu, A., & Chapman, A. L. (2013). Borderline personality features and emotional reactivity: The mediating role of interpersonal vulnerabilities. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 44(2), 271-278.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.12.001 URL |
[39] |
* Domsalla, M., Koppe, G., Niedtfeld, I., Vollstädt-Klein, S., Schmahl, C., Bohus, M., & Lis, S. (2014). Cerebral processing of social rejection in patients with borderline personality disorder. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(11), 1789-1797.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nst176 pmid: 24273076 |
[40] |
Downey, G., & Feldman, S. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1327-1343.
pmid: 8667172 |
[41] |
Downey, G., Lebolt, A., Rincón, C., & Freitas, A. L. (1998). Rejection sensitivity and children's interpersonal difficulties. Child Development, 69(4), 1074-1091.
pmid: 9768487 |
[42] |
Downey, G., Mougios, V., Ayduk, O., London, B. E., & Shoda, Y. (2004). Rejection sensitivity and the defensive motivational system: Insights from the startle response to rejection cues. Psychological Science, 15(10), 668-673.
doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00738.x URL |
[43] | * Erbe, J. K. (2014). Mental representations, social exclusion, and neurobiological processes in borderline personality disorder: A multi-level study (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). City University of New York. |
[44] |
Eschenbeck, H., Kohlmann, C.-W., & Lohaus, A. (2007). Gender differences in coping strategies in children and adolescents. Journal of Individual Differences, 28(1), 18-26.
doi: 10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.18 URL |
[45] |
* Euler, S., Stöbi, D., Sowislo, J., Ritzler, F., Huber, C. G., Lang, U. E., ... Walter, M. (2018). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism in borderline personality disorder. Psychopathology, 51(2), 110-121.
doi: 10.1159/000486601 URL |
[46] |
Falk, C. F., Heine, S. J., Yuki, M., & Takemura, K. (2009). Why do westerners self-enhance more than east Asians? European Journal of Personality, 23(3), 183-203.
doi: 10.1002/per.715 URL |
[47] |
Fan, V. S., Mahadevan, R., & Leung, J. (2020). Effect of income inequality, community infrastructure and individual stressors on adult depression. Health Promotion International, 36(1), 46-57.
doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa036 URL |
[48] |
* Fertuck, E. A., Grinband, J., & Stanley, B. (2013). Facial trust appraisal negatively biased in borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry Research, 207(3), 195-202.
doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.01.004 URL |
[49] | First, M. B., Gibbon, M., Spitzer, R. L., Benjamin, L. S., & Williams, J. B. W. (1997). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders (SCID-II). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Pub. |
[50] | Foxhall, M., Hamilton‐Giachritsis, C., & Button, K. (2019). The link between rejection sensitivity and borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 289-326. |
[51] |
Gao, S. L., Assink, M., Cipriani, A., & Lin, K. G. (2017). Associations between rejection sensitivity and mental health outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 57, 59-74.
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.08.007 URL |
[52] |
Gardner, A. A., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Modecki, K. L. (2020). A longitudinal model of rejection sensitivity and internalizing symptoms: Testing emotion regulation deficits as a mechanism and outcome of symptoms. Journal of Personality, 88(6), 1045-1057.
doi: 10.1111/jopy.v88.6 URL |
[53] |
* Gardner, K. J., Qualter, P., Stylianou, M., & Robinson, A. J. (2010). Facial affect recognition in non-clinical adults with borderline personality features: The role of effortful control and rejection sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(7), 799-804.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.018 URL |
[54] |
* Goodman, J., Fertuck, E., Chesin, M., Lichenstein, S., & Stanley, B. (2014). The moderating role of rejection sensitivity in the relationship between emotional maltreatment and borderline symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 146-150.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.038 URL |
[55] |
* Gutz, L., Renneberg, B., Roepke, S., & Niedeggen, M. (2015). Neural processing of social participation in borderline personality disorder and social anxiety disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(2), 421-431.
doi: 10.1037/a0038614 pmid: 25603358 |
[56] |
Hay, E. L., & Diehl, M. (2011). Emotion complexity and emotion regulation across adulthood. European Journal of Ageing, 8(3), 157-168.
doi: 10.1007/s10433-011-0191-7 URL |
[57] |
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557-560.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 URL |
[58] |
Jacobs, N., & Harper, B. (2013). The effects of rejection sensitivity on reactive and proactive aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 39(1), 3-12.
doi: 10.1002/ab.21455 URL |
[59] | Jin, Y. C., Li, J. Y., An, J. X., Wu, J., & He, M. C. (2019). The differential victimization associated with depression and anxiety in cross-cultural perspective: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20(4), 560-573. |
[60] |
* Jobst, A., Albert, A., Bauriedl-Schmidt, C., Mauer, M. C., Renneberg, B., Buchheim, A., ... Padberg, F. (2014). Social exclusion leads to divergent changes of oxytocin levels in borderline patients and healthy subjects. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(4), 252-254.
doi: 10.1159/000358526 URL |
[61] | * Jobst, A., Padberg, F., Mauer, M. C., Daltrozzo, T., Bauriedl-Schmidt, C., Sabass, L., ... Buchheim, A. (2016). Lower oxytocin plasma levels in borderline patients with unresolved attachment representations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 125-135. |
[62] |
Jones, T. M., Nurius, P., Song, C., & Fleming, C. M. (2018). Modeling life course pathways from adverse childhood experiences to adult mental health. Child Abuse & Neglect, 80, 32-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.03.005 URL |
[63] |
* Koster, N., de Maat, D. A., Schreur, M., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2018). How borderline personality characteristics affect adolescents’ life satisfaction: The role of rejection sensitivity and social relations. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(5), 594-607.
doi: 10.1080/17405629.2017.1321983 URL |
[64] | * Lazarus, S. A., Scott, L. N., Beeney, J. E., Wright, A. G., Stepp, S. D., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2018). Borderline personality disorder symptoms and affective responding to perceptions of rejection and acceptance from romantic versus nonromantic partners. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(3), 197-206. |
[65] |
* Lazarus, S. A., Southward, M. W., & Cheavens, J. S. (2016). Do borderline personality disorder features and rejection sensitivity predict social network outcomes over time? Personality and Individual Differences, 100, 62-67.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.032 URL |
[66] | Levy, S. R., Ayduk, O., Downey, G., & Leary, M. R. (2001). The role of rejection sensitivity in people’s relationships with significant others and valued social groups. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection (pp.251-290). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. |
[67] | Liebke, L., Bungert, M., Thome, J., Hauschild, S., Gescher, D. M., Schmahl, C., Bohus, M., & Lis, S. (2017). Loneliness, social networks, and social functioning in borderline personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8(4), 349-356. |
[68] |
* Liebke, L., Koppe, G., Bungert, M., Thome, J., Hauschild, S., Defiebre, N., ... Lis, S. (2018). Difficulties with being socially accepted: An experimental study in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 127(7), 670-682.
doi: 10.1037/abn0000373 pmid: 30102052 |
[69] | * Masland, S. R. (2016). Trustworthiness Appraisal in Borderline Personality Disorder(Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Harvard University, Cambridge. |
[70] |
McDonald, K. L., Bowker, J. C., Rubin, K. H., Laursen, B., & Duchene, M. S. (2010). Interactions between rejection sensitivity and supportive relationships in the prediction of adolescents’ internalizing difficulties. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(5), 563-574.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-010-9519-4 URL |
[71] |
Mendoza-Denton, R., Downey, G., Purdie, V. J., Davis, A., & Pietrzak, J. (2002). Sensitivity to status-based rejection: Implications for African American students' college experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 896-918.
pmid: 12374443 |
[72] |
* Meyer, B., Ajchenbrenner, M., & Bowles, D. P. (2005). Sensory sensitivity, attachment experiences, and rejection responses among adults with borderline and avoidant features. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19(6), 641-658.
doi: 10.1521/pedi.2005.19.6.641 URL |
[73] |
* Miano, A., Fertuck, E. A., Arntz, A., & Stanley, B. (2013). Rejection sensitivity is a mediator between borderline personality disorder features and facial trust appraisal. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27(4), 442-456.
doi: 10.1521/pedi_2013_27_096 URL |
[74] | Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. |
[75] |
Murphy, A. M., & Russell, G. (2016). Rejection sensitivity, jealousy, and the relationship to interpersonal aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(13), 2118-2129.
doi: 10.1177/0886260515622572 URL |
[76] |
Park, L. E. (2007). Appearance-based rejection sensitivity: Implications for mental and physical health, affect, and motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(4), 490-504.
doi: 10.1177/0146167206296301 URL |
[77] |
* Peters, J. R., Smart, L. M., & Baer, R. A. (2015). Dysfunctional responses to emotion mediate the cross-sectional relationship between rejection sensitivity and borderline personality features. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29(2), 231-240.
doi: 10.1521/pedi_2014_28_151 URL |
[78] | Pietrzak, J., Downey, G., & Ayduk, Ö. (2005). Rejection sensitivity as an interpersonal vulnerability. In M. W. Baldwin (Ed.), Interpersonal cognition (pp.62-84). New York, NY: Guilford Press. |
[79] |
Ran, G. M., Zhang, Q., & Huang, H. (2018). Behavioral inhibition system and self-esteem as mediators between shyness and social anxiety. Psychiatry Research, 270, 568-573.
doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.10.017 URL |
[80] | * Renneberg, B., Herm, K., Hahn, A., Staebler, K., Lammers, C. H., & Roepke, S. (2012). Perception of social participation in borderline personality disorder. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 19(6), 473-480. |
[81] |
Romero-Canyas, R., Downey, G., Berenson, K., Ayduk, Ö., & Kang, N. J. (2010). Rejection sensitivity and the rejection-hostility link in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality, 78(1), 119-148.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00611.x pmid: 20433615 |
[82] |
* Rosenbach, C., & Renneberg, B. (2014). Rejection sensitivity as a mediator of the relationship between experienced rejection and borderline characteristics. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 176-181.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.032 URL |
[83] |
* Rosenbach, C., & Renneberg, B. (2015). Remembering rejection: Specificity and linguistic styles of autobiographical memories in borderline personality disorder and depression. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 46, 85-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.09.002 URL |
[84] | Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (Eds.). (2006). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
[85] |
* Sato, M., Fonagy, P., & Luyten, P. (2018). Rejection sensitivity and borderline personality disorder features: A mediation model of effortful control and intolerance of ambiguity. Psychiatry Research, 269, 50-55.
doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.024 URL |
[86] |
* Sato, M., Fonagy, P., & Luyten, P. (2020). Rejection sensitivity and borderline personality disorder features: The mediating roles of attachment anxiety, need to belong, and self-criticism. Journal of Personality Disorders, 34(2), 273-288.
doi: 10.1521/pedi_2019_33_397 URL |
[87] |
Sebastian, C. L., Tan, G. C. Y., Roiser, J. P., Viding, E., Dumontheil, I., & Blakemore, S. J. (2011). Developmental influences on the neural bases of responses to social rejection: Implications of social neuroscience for education. Neuroimage, 57(3), 686-694.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.063 URL |
[88] |
* Seidl, E., Padberg, F., Bauriedl-Schmidt, C., Albert, A., Daltrozzo, T., Hall, J., ... Jobst, A. (2020). Response to ostracism in patients with chronic depression, episodic depression and borderline personality disorder a study using Cyberball. Journal of Affective Disorders, 260, 254-262.
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.09.021 URL |
[89] |
* Selby, E. A., Ward, A. C., & Joiner, T. E. (2010). Dysregulated eating behaviors in borderline personality disorder: Are rejection sensitivity and emotion dysregulation linking mechanisms? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 43(7), 667-670.
doi: 10.1002/eat.20761 URL |
[90] |
Sher, L., Rutter, S. B., New, A. S., Siever, L. J., & Hazlett, E. A. (2019). Gender differences and similarities in aggression, suicidal behaviour, and psychiatric comorbidity in borderline personality disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 139(2), 145-153.
doi: 10.1111/acps.2019.139.issue-2 URL |
[91] | * Shorey, R. C., Anderson, S., & Stuart, G. L. (2014). The relation between antisocial and borderline personality symptoms and early maladaptive schemas in a treatment seeking sample of male substance users. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 21(4), 341-351. |
[92] | * Skinner, S. (2014). Repsonses to social rejection: The role of Borderline Personality Disorder traits (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). The University of North Carolina at Greensboro. |
[93] |
* Sommerfeld, E., & Bitton, M. S. (2020). Rejection sensitivity, self-compassion, and aggressive behavior: The role of borderline features as a mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 44-51.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00044 pmid: 32038443 |
[94] |
Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B., Gibbon, M, & First, M. B. (1992). The structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R (SCID) I: History, rationale, and description. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49(8), 624-629.
pmid: 1637252 |
[95] | * Staebler, K., Helbing, E., Rosenbach, C., & Renneberg, B. (2011). Rejection sensitivity and borderline personality disorder. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 18(4), 275-283. |
[96] | * Strimpfel, J. M. (2012). Rejection sensitivity in adolescent offspring of mothers with borderline personality disorder (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Tennessee- Knoxville. |
[97] | Temes, C. M., Frankenburg, F. R., Fitzmaurice, G. M., & Zanarini, M. C. (2019). Deaths by suicide and other causes among patients with borderline personality disorder and personality-disordered comparison subjects over 24 years of prospective follow-up. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 80(1), 18m12436. |
[98] | * Thome, J., Liebke, L., Bungert, M., Schmahl, C., Domes, G., Bohus, M., & Lis, S. (2016). Confidence in facial emotion recognition in borderline personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7(2), 159-168. |
[99] | Torgersen, S. (2012). Epidemiology. In T. A. Widiger (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of personality disorders (pp.186-205). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. |
[100] |
* Tragesser, S. L., Lippman, L. G., Trull, T. J., & Barrett, K. C. (2008). Borderline personality disorder features and cognitive, emotional, and predicted behavioral reactions to teasing. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(6), 1512-1523.
doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.07.003 URL |
[101] |
Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Stucke, T. S. (2002). If you can't join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1058-1069.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1058 URL |
[102] |
Wang, H. Y., Braun, C., & Enck, P. (2017). How the brain reacts to social stress (exclusion) - A scoping review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 80, 80-88.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.05.012 URL |
[103] |
Watson, J., & Nesdale, D. (2012). Rejection sensitivity, social withdrawal, and loneliness in young adults. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(8), 1984-2005.
doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00927.x URL |
[104] |
Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425-452.
pmid: 16968209 |
[105] |
Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K. T., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 748-762.
pmid: 11079239 |
[106] |
Winter, D., Bohus, M., & Lis, S. (2017). Understanding negative self-evaluations in borderline personality disorder - A review of self-related cognitions, emotions, and motives. Current Psychiatry Reports, 19(3), 17.
doi: 10.1007/s11920-017-0771-0 URL |
[107] |
* Winter, D., Koplin, K., & Lis, S. (2015). Can’t stand the look in the mirror? Self-awareness avoidance in borderline personality disorder. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 2(1), 13.
doi: 10.1186/s40479-015-0034-9 URL |
[108] |
* Winter, D., Koplin, K., Schmahl, C., Bohus, M., & Lis, S. (2016). Evaluation and memory of social events in borderline personality disorder: Effects of valence and self-referential context. Psychiatry Research, 240, 19-25.
doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.03.042 URL |
[109] | * Wrege, J. S., Ruocco, A. C., Euler, S., Preller, K. H., Busmann, M., Meya, L., ... Walter, M. (2019). Negative affect moderates the effect of social rejection on frontal and anterior cingulate cortex activation in borderline personality disorder. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 19(5), 1273-1285. |
[110] |
Zanarini, M. C., Vujanovic, A. A., Parachini, E. A., Boulanger, J. L., Frankenburg, F. R., & Hennen, J. (2003). A screening measure for BPD: The McLean screening instrument for borderline personality disorder (MSI-BPD). Journal of Personality Disorders, 17(6), 568-573.
doi: 10.1521/pedi.17.6.568.25355 URL |
[111] |
* Zielinski, M. J., & Veilleux, J. C. (2014). Examining the relation between borderline personality features and social support: The mediating role of rejection sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 235-238.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.005 URL |
[112] |
Zotzmann, Y., van der Linden, D., & Wyrwa, K. (2019). The relation between country differences, cultural values, personality dimensions, and error orientation: An approach across three continents-Asia, Europe, and North America. Safety Science, 120, 185-193.
doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.013 |
[1] | 卫旭华, 焦文颖. 权力接近-抑制行为理论:基于元分析的理论拓展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(2): 274-290. |
[2] | 赵子卿, 余锦婷, 陈嘉彦, 王芸茹, 黄佳, 陈楚侨. 精神病临床高危人群的症状和功能改变:一项系统综述和三水平元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(1): 42-61. |
[3] | 苏涛, 曾浩文, 钟晓琳, 马文聪, 陈修德. 祸福相依:自恋型领导对下属效能双面效应的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(9): 1463-1487. |
[4] | 唐甜, 王雨, 巩芳颍, 石可, 李喜, 刘伟, 陈宁. 家庭教养方式与中国青少年积极发展的关系:系列元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(8): 1302-1314. |
[5] | 孟现鑫, 颜晨, 俞德霖, 高树玲, 傅小兰. 童年创伤与网络成瘾关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(7): 1087-1103. |
[6] | 吴佳桧, 傅海伦. 成就目标定向与学业成绩关系的元分析:自我效能感、学习投入的中介作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(7): 1104-1125. |
[7] | 文思雁, 于旭晨, 金磊, 宫俊如, 张晓函, 孙敬林, 张杉, 吕厚超. 儿童青少年家庭功能障碍与心理健康关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(5): 771-789. |
[8] | 袁悦, 吴志明, 谢秋实. 时间压力对个体工作结果的作用效果: 基于元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(3): 465-485. |
[9] | 尹奎, 迟志康, 董念念, 李培凯, 赵景. 团队反思与团队资源开发、利用及团队结果的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(2): 228-245. |
[10] | 孟现鑫, 陈怡静, 王馨怡, 袁加锦, 俞德霖. 学校联结与抑郁的关系:一项三水平元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(2): 246-263. |
[11] | 韩志伟, 程延园, 任志帅, 王丹阳, 李国静. 工作连通行为与工作−生活冲突的元分析:基于工作−家庭资源模型的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(12): 2031-2049. |
[12] | 诸彦含, 贺彬, 孙蕾. 状态权力感对亲社会行为的影响:一项三水平元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(11): 1786-1799. |
[13] | 蒋建武, 龙晗寰, 胡洁宇. 工作场所人工智能应用对员工影响的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(10): 1621-1639. |
[14] | 刘红艳, 周泳含, 陈艳霞. 次优食品营销干预策略的有效性探究:来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(10): 1640-1658. |
[15] | 康丹, 文敏, 张颖杰. 儿童精细动作技能与数学能力的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(8): 1443-1459. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||