心理科学进展 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7): 1104-1125.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.01104 cstr: 32111.14.2024.01104
收稿日期:
2023-07-11
出版日期:
2024-07-15
发布日期:
2024-05-09
通讯作者:
傅海伦, E-mail: f_hailun@163.com基金资助:
Received:
2023-07-11
Online:
2024-07-15
Published:
2024-05-09
摘要:
成就目标定向是影响学生学业成绩的重要因素, 诸多研究探讨了成就目标定向与学业成绩之间的内在联系, 但二者之间相关性的大小、中介和调节机制仍存有争议。因此当前研究采用元分析方法检验效应量的可靠性、自我效能感和学习投入的中介效应以及一系列调节效应。研究共纳入符合要求的原始文献67篇, 含206个效应量。结果发现:(1)掌握接近目标和表现接近目标与学业成绩呈显著正相关, 而掌握回避目标和表现回避目标与学业成绩呈显著负相关, 且各指标与学业成绩存在稳健的弱相关。(2)成就目标定向与学业成绩的关系受到年龄阶段、测量工具的影响, 不受性别比例、成绩类型的调节。(3)自我效能感和学习投入在成就目标定向对学业成绩影响中发挥着中介作用, 但学习投入的中介作用只存在于中学组, 在大学组学习投入的中介作用不显著。
中图分类号:
吴佳桧, 傅海伦. (2024). 成就目标定向与学业成绩关系的元分析:自我效能感、学习投入的中介作用. 心理科学进展 , 32(7), 1104-1125.
WU Jiahui, FU Hailun. (2024). A meta-analysis of the relationship between achievement goal orientation and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and student engagement. Advances in Psychological Science, 32(7), 1104-1125.
变量关系 | K | r | 95% CI | Z | Qw | p | I2 | T2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAP & AP | 60 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.23 | 15.78 | 261.43*** | < 0.001 | 77.43 | 0.007 |
MVP & AP | 24 | −0.08 | −0.12 | −0.04 | −4.05 | 108.72*** | < 0.001 | 78.85 | 0.007 |
PAP & AP | 60 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 6.87 | 341.69*** | < 0.001 | 82.73 | 0.009 |
PVP & AP | 62 | −0.12 | −0.14 | −0.09 | −9.30 | 266.25*** | < 0.001 | 77.09 | 0.007 |
表1 异质性检验和基于随机效应模型的平均效应
变量关系 | K | r | 95% CI | Z | Qw | p | I2 | T2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAP & AP | 60 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.23 | 15.78 | 261.43*** | < 0.001 | 77.43 | 0.007 |
MVP & AP | 24 | −0.08 | −0.12 | −0.04 | −4.05 | 108.72*** | < 0.001 | 78.85 | 0.007 |
PAP & AP | 60 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 6.87 | 341.69*** | < 0.001 | 82.73 | 0.009 |
PVP & AP | 62 | −0.12 | −0.14 | −0.09 | −9.30 | 266.25*** | < 0.001 | 77.09 | 0.007 |
变量关系 | K | N | r | 95% CI | I2 | 异质性 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qw | df | p | |||||||
MAP & SE | 43 | 16775 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.57 | 92.12 | 533.11*** | 42 | < 0.001 |
MVP & SE | 17 | 7524 | −0.13 | −0.21 | −0.06 | 90.06 | 140.82*** | 16 | < 0.001 |
PAP & SE | 43 | 16937 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.31 | 88.90 | 369.27*** | 42 | < 0.001 |
PVP & SE | 45 | 20492 | −0.15 | −0.18 | −0.12 | 81.16 | 233.56*** | 44 | < 0.001 |
MAP & LE | 37 | 24303 | 0.48 | 0.43 | 0.53 | 91.67 | 420.40*** | 36 | < 0.001 |
MVP & LE | 12 | 7008 | −0.10 | −0.18 | −0.02 | 91.13 | 135.29*** | 11 | < 0.001 |
PAP & LE | 33 | 19764 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.26 | 86.39 | 235.18*** | 32 | < 0.001 |
PVP & LE | 37 | 22190 | −0.13 | −0.19 | −0.08 | 93.37 | 542.64*** | 36 | < 0.001 |
表2 成就目标定向与自我效能感、学习投入的元分析结果
变量关系 | K | N | r | 95% CI | I2 | 异质性 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qw | df | p | |||||||
MAP & SE | 43 | 16775 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.57 | 92.12 | 533.11*** | 42 | < 0.001 |
MVP & SE | 17 | 7524 | −0.13 | −0.21 | −0.06 | 90.06 | 140.82*** | 16 | < 0.001 |
PAP & SE | 43 | 16937 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.31 | 88.90 | 369.27*** | 42 | < 0.001 |
PVP & SE | 45 | 20492 | −0.15 | −0.18 | −0.12 | 81.16 | 233.56*** | 44 | < 0.001 |
MAP & LE | 37 | 24303 | 0.48 | 0.43 | 0.53 | 91.67 | 420.40*** | 36 | < 0.001 |
MVP & LE | 12 | 7008 | −0.10 | −0.18 | −0.02 | 91.13 | 135.29*** | 11 | < 0.001 |
PAP & LE | 33 | 19764 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.26 | 86.39 | 235.18*** | 32 | < 0.001 |
PVP & LE | 37 | 22190 | −0.13 | −0.19 | −0.08 | 93.37 | 542.64*** | 36 | < 0.001 |
指标 | 调节变量 | 类别 | 异质性分析 | 效应量及95%的置信区间 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB | df | p | K | r | 95% | ||||
MAP | 年龄阶段 | 小学 | 20.93 | 2 | 0.000 | 7 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 0.34 |
中学 | 28 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.27 | |||||
大学 | 25 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.17 | |||||
测量工具 | AGQ | 8.72 | 2 | 0.013 | 19 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.25 | |
AGQ-R | 6 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.30 | |||||
PALS | 33 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.23 | |||||
成绩类型 | 课程测验 | 0.90 | 1 | 0.343 | 52 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.24 | |
标准化测验 | 8 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.23 | |||||
MVP | 年龄阶段 | 小学 | 9.84 | 2 | 0.007 | 1 | −0.14 | −0.22 | −0.06 |
中学 | 12 | −0.13 | −0.18 | −0.08 | |||||
大学 | 11 | −0.05 | −0.08 | −0.03 | |||||
测量工具 | AGQ | 6.91 | 2 | 0.032 | 11 | −0.10 | −0.18 | −0.01 | |
AGQ-R | 7 | −0.12 | −0.18 | −0.07 | |||||
PALS | 6 | −0.05 | −0.08 | −0.02 | |||||
成绩类型 | 课程测验 | 1.18 | 1 | 0.277 | 22 | −0.10 | −0.13 | −0.07 | |
标准化测验 | 2 | −0.07 | −0.11 | −0.03 | |||||
PAP | 年龄阶段 | 小学 | 9.57 | 2 | 0.008 | 8 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.22 |
中学 | 28 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.16 | |||||
大学 | 24 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.11 | |||||
测量工具 | AGQ | 30.77 | 2 | 0.000 | 18 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.17 | |
AGQ-R | 7 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.26 | |||||
PALS | 33 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.11 | |||||
成绩类型 | 课程测验 | 0.53 | 1 | 0.467 | 53 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.14 | |
标准化测验 | 7 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.15 | |||||
PVP | 年龄阶段 | 小学 | 8.45 | 2 | 0.015 | 7 | −0.17 | −0.25 | −0.10 |
中学 | 31 | −0.14 | −0.17 | −0.11 | |||||
大学 | 25 | −0.07 | −0.11 | −0.03 | |||||
测量工具 | AGQ | 6.13 | 2 | 0.047 | 21 | −0.13 | −0.17 | −0.09 | |
AGQ-R | 8 | −0.16 | −0.22 | −0.11 | |||||
PALS | 31 | −0.09 | −0.12 | −0.06 | |||||
成绩类型 | 课程测验 | 1.11 | 1 | 0.291 | 54 | −0.12 | −0.15 | −0.09 | |
标准化测验 | 8 | −0.09 | −0.14 | −0.05 |
表3 分类变量的调节效应
指标 | 调节变量 | 类别 | 异质性分析 | 效应量及95%的置信区间 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB | df | p | K | r | 95% | ||||
MAP | 年龄阶段 | 小学 | 20.93 | 2 | 0.000 | 7 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 0.34 |
中学 | 28 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.27 | |||||
大学 | 25 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.17 | |||||
测量工具 | AGQ | 8.72 | 2 | 0.013 | 19 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.25 | |
AGQ-R | 6 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.30 | |||||
PALS | 33 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.23 | |||||
成绩类型 | 课程测验 | 0.90 | 1 | 0.343 | 52 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.24 | |
标准化测验 | 8 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.23 | |||||
MVP | 年龄阶段 | 小学 | 9.84 | 2 | 0.007 | 1 | −0.14 | −0.22 | −0.06 |
中学 | 12 | −0.13 | −0.18 | −0.08 | |||||
大学 | 11 | −0.05 | −0.08 | −0.03 | |||||
测量工具 | AGQ | 6.91 | 2 | 0.032 | 11 | −0.10 | −0.18 | −0.01 | |
AGQ-R | 7 | −0.12 | −0.18 | −0.07 | |||||
PALS | 6 | −0.05 | −0.08 | −0.02 | |||||
成绩类型 | 课程测验 | 1.18 | 1 | 0.277 | 22 | −0.10 | −0.13 | −0.07 | |
标准化测验 | 2 | −0.07 | −0.11 | −0.03 | |||||
PAP | 年龄阶段 | 小学 | 9.57 | 2 | 0.008 | 8 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.22 |
中学 | 28 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.16 | |||||
大学 | 24 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.11 | |||||
测量工具 | AGQ | 30.77 | 2 | 0.000 | 18 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.17 | |
AGQ-R | 7 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.26 | |||||
PALS | 33 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.11 | |||||
成绩类型 | 课程测验 | 0.53 | 1 | 0.467 | 53 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.14 | |
标准化测验 | 7 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.15 | |||||
PVP | 年龄阶段 | 小学 | 8.45 | 2 | 0.015 | 7 | −0.17 | −0.25 | −0.10 |
中学 | 31 | −0.14 | −0.17 | −0.11 | |||||
大学 | 25 | −0.07 | −0.11 | −0.03 | |||||
测量工具 | AGQ | 6.13 | 2 | 0.047 | 21 | −0.13 | −0.17 | −0.09 | |
AGQ-R | 8 | −0.16 | −0.22 | −0.11 | |||||
PALS | 31 | −0.09 | −0.12 | −0.06 | |||||
成绩类型 | 课程测验 | 1.11 | 1 | 0.291 | 54 | −0.12 | −0.15 | −0.09 | |
标准化测验 | 8 | −0.09 | −0.14 | −0.05 |
指标 | 连续变量 | Beta | Standard Error | 95% CI | Z | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAP | 截距 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.01, 0.18 | 2.10 | 0.136 |
性别比例 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05, 0.45 | 2.49 | 0.113 | |
MVP | 截距 | −0.09 | 0.09 | −0.26, 0.08 | −0.11 | 0.300 |
性别比例 | 0.01 | 0.19 | −0.37, 0.39 | 0.05 | 0.957 | |
PAP | 截距 | 0.04 | 0.05 | −0.07, 0.14 | 0.68 | 0.497 |
性别比例 | 0.16 | 0.11 | −0.06, 0.38 | 1.40 | 0.160 | |
PVP | 截距 | -0.15 | 0.05 | −0.24, −0.06 | −3.19 | 0.010 |
性别比例 | 0.08 | 0.10 | −0.12, 0.27 | 0.77 | 0.443 |
表4 连续变量对效应量的元回归分析
指标 | 连续变量 | Beta | Standard Error | 95% CI | Z | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAP | 截距 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.01, 0.18 | 2.10 | 0.136 |
性别比例 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05, 0.45 | 2.49 | 0.113 | |
MVP | 截距 | −0.09 | 0.09 | −0.26, 0.08 | −0.11 | 0.300 |
性别比例 | 0.01 | 0.19 | −0.37, 0.39 | 0.05 | 0.957 | |
PAP | 截距 | 0.04 | 0.05 | −0.07, 0.14 | 0.68 | 0.497 |
性别比例 | 0.16 | 0.11 | −0.06, 0.38 | 1.40 | 0.160 | |
PVP | 截距 | -0.15 | 0.05 | −0.24, −0.06 | −3.19 | 0.010 |
性别比例 | 0.08 | 0.10 | −0.12, 0.27 | 0.77 | 0.443 |
变量 | MAP | MVP | PAP | PVP | SE | LE | AP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAP | — | ||||||
MVP | — | — | |||||
PAP | — | — | — | ||||
PVP | — | — | — | — | |||
SE | 0.47*** | −0.13*** | 0.26*** | −0.15*** | — | ||
LE | 0.44*** | −0.09*** | 0.20*** | −0.13*** | 0.41** | — | |
AP | 0.20*** | −0.08*** | 0.10*** | −0.11*** | 0.33** | 0.20** | — |
表5 成就目标定向、自我效能感、学习投入、学业成绩的相关矩阵
变量 | MAP | MVP | PAP | PVP | SE | LE | AP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAP | — | ||||||
MVP | — | — | |||||
PAP | — | — | — | ||||
PVP | — | — | — | — | |||
SE | 0.47*** | −0.13*** | 0.26*** | −0.15*** | — | ||
LE | 0.44*** | −0.09*** | 0.20*** | −0.13*** | 0.41** | — | |
AP | 0.20*** | −0.08*** | 0.10*** | −0.11*** | 0.33** | 0.20** | — |
中介变量 | a1 | a2 | a3 | b1 | b2 | c' | a1b1 | a2b2 | a1a3b2 | c'' | c |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAP-SE-LE-AP | 0.46 | 0.32 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 0.19 |
MVP-SE-LE-AP | −0.13 | −0.06 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.07 | −0.04 | −0.04 | −0.01 | 0.00 | −0.05 | −0.09 |
PAP-SE-LE-AP | 0.26 | 0.11 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.11 |
PVP-SE-LE-AP | −0.14 | −0.07 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.07 | −0.05 | −0.04 | −0.01 | 0.00 | −0.05 | −0.10 |
表6 自我效能感、学习投入中介效应路径分析
中介变量 | a1 | a2 | a3 | b1 | b2 | c' | a1b1 | a2b2 | a1a3b2 | c'' | c |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAP-SE-LE-AP | 0.46 | 0.32 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 0.19 |
MVP-SE-LE-AP | −0.13 | −0.06 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.07 | −0.04 | −0.04 | −0.01 | 0.00 | −0.05 | −0.09 |
PAP-SE-LE-AP | 0.26 | 0.11 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.11 |
PVP-SE-LE-AP | −0.14 | −0.07 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.07 | −0.05 | −0.04 | −0.01 | 0.00 | −0.05 | −0.10 |
路径系数 | 中学 | 大学 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b21 | b31 | b41 | b32 | b42 | b43 | b21 | b31 | b41 | b32 | b42 | b43 | |
MAP-SE-LE-AP | 0.48*** | 0.31*** | 0.03 | 0.40*** | 0.34*** | 0.06* | 0.44*** | 0.30*** | 0.03 | 0.36*** | 0.23*** | 0.01 |
MVP-SE-LE-AP | −0.14** | −0.06* | −0.03 | 0.40*** | 0.34*** | 0.06* | −0.12** | −0.07* | −0.05 | 0.36*** | 0.23*** | 0.01 |
PAP-SE-LE-AP | 0.25*** | 0.07* | 0.01 | 0.40*** | 0.34*** | 0.06* | 0.24*** | 0.15** | 0.02 | 0.36*** | 0.23*** | 0.01 |
PVP-SE-LE-AP | −0.13** | −0.06* | −0.05 | 0.40*** | 0.34*** | 0.06* | −0.16** | −0.09* | −0.04 | 0.36*** | 0.23*** | 0.01 |
表7 中介模型的年龄阶段比较
路径系数 | 中学 | 大学 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b21 | b31 | b41 | b32 | b42 | b43 | b21 | b31 | b41 | b32 | b42 | b43 | |
MAP-SE-LE-AP | 0.48*** | 0.31*** | 0.03 | 0.40*** | 0.34*** | 0.06* | 0.44*** | 0.30*** | 0.03 | 0.36*** | 0.23*** | 0.01 |
MVP-SE-LE-AP | −0.14** | −0.06* | −0.03 | 0.40*** | 0.34*** | 0.06* | −0.12** | −0.07* | −0.05 | 0.36*** | 0.23*** | 0.01 |
PAP-SE-LE-AP | 0.25*** | 0.07* | 0.01 | 0.40*** | 0.34*** | 0.06* | 0.24*** | 0.15** | 0.02 | 0.36*** | 0.23*** | 0.01 |
PVP-SE-LE-AP | −0.13** | −0.06* | −0.05 | 0.40*** | 0.34*** | 0.06* | −0.16** | −0.09* | −0.04 | 0.36*** | 0.23*** | 0.01 |
编号 | 第一作者及年份 | 样本量 | 年龄阶段 | 性别 比例 | 测量 工具 | 变量关系 | 成绩类型 | 文献质量 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Adkins, | 206 | 大学 | 29.61% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/4/4 |
2 | Antaramian, | 357 | 大学 | 45.94% | AGQ-R | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 4/4/4/4 |
3 | Avci, | 110 | 大学 | 62.73% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7/7 |
4 | Barber, | 270 | 大学 | NA | AGQ | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 标准化测验 | 5/5/5 |
5 | Billotti, | 192 | 中学 | 50.00% | AGQ | MAP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/6/4 |
6 | Bjørnebekk, | 231 | 大学 | 19.48% | AGQ | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 4/5/5/4 |
7 | Blume, | 108 | 中学 | 93.52% | AGQ | PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7 |
8 | Bong, | 375 | 中学 | 0.00% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/6/6 |
9 | Bong, | 647 | 小学 | 55.64% | PALS | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/6/5/6 |
500 | 中学 | 51.00% | PALS | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/6/5/6 | ||
10 | Bong, | 306 | 中学 | 50.98% | AGQ | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/7/6 |
11 | Bubic, | 361 | 中学 | 34.63% | AGQ | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/5/6/7 |
12 | Çakir, | 334 | 中学 | 56.89% | AGQ-R | MVP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7 |
13 | Cao, | 129 | 大学 | 21.71% | AGQ | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7/7/7 |
14 | Carter, | 205 | 大学 | 38.05% | AGQ | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 3/2/3/2 |
15 | Chan, | 1381 | 中学 | 56.92% | AGQ | MAP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7/6 |
16 | Chen, | 508 | 小学 | 58.46% | PALS | PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/6 |
17 | Christian, | 453 | 大学 | 22.96% | PALS | MAP/PAP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/5 |
18 | Curelaru, | 175 | 小学/中学 | 42.86% | PALS | PVP & SE &AP | 标准化测验 | 5 |
19 | D’Lima, | 591 | 大学 | 37.39% | PALS | MAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/6 |
20 | Diseth, | 177 | 大学 | 20.34% | AGQ | MAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/4 |
21 | Diseth, | 229 | 大学 | 33.19% | AGQ | MAP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 4/5/3 |
22 | Ferla, | 512 | 大学 | 13.87% | AGQ | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/7/7 |
23 | Gonida, | 282 | 中学 | 46.10% | PALS | MAP/PAP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/7 |
24 | Guo, | 321 | 小学 | 56.70% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/5/6 |
211 | 小学 | 54.50% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/5/6 | ||
25 | Hunsu, | 171 | 大学 | NA | AGQ | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/5/6 |
26 | Jiang, | 339 | 小学 | 53.69% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/6/6 |
507 | 中学 | 47.93% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/6/6 | ||
27 | Jørgensen Olsen, | 571 | 中学 | 48.69% | AGQ | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 4/5/5/4 |
28 | Kaplan, | 211 | 中学 | 46.45% | PALS | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/5/7/6 |
29 | Karakus, | 98 | 中学 | 45.92% | PALS | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/5/5/4 |
30 | Karlen, | 1215 | 中学 | 43.13% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/7/7 |
31 | Kennedy, | 671 | 大学 | 39.64% | AGQ | MVP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/5/5 |
32 | King, | 588 | 中学 | 42.52% | AGQ-R | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/6/6/6 |
33 | Lau, | 3943 | 小学 | 52.70% | PALS | MAP/PAP & LE &AP | 标准化测验 | 7/7 |
34 | Liem, | 1475 | 中学 | 47.12% | PALS | PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 标准化测验 | 7/5 |
35 | Limpo, | 196 | 中学 | 42.86% | NA | MAP/PAP & SE &AP | 标准化测验 | 4/4 |
36 | Liu, | 2057 | 大学 | NA | PALS | MVP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/7 |
37 | Los, | 315 | 大学 | 37.46% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/5/7 |
38 | Lu, | 316 | 大学 | 48.10% | NA | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7/7 |
39 | Lüftenegger, | 210 | 中学 | 50.48% | AGQ | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7/7 |
40 | Luo, | 1667 | 中学 | 52.73% | AGQ | MAP/MVP/PVP & LE &AP | 标准化测验 | 8/8/8 |
41 | Luo, | 1697 | 中学 | 46.26% | PALS | MAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 标准化测验 | 7/7 |
42 | Luo, | 1939 | 中学 | 53.17% | PALS | MAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 8/8 |
43 | Middleton, | 512 | 中学 | 48.05% | PALS | PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/5 |
44 | Muenks, | 190 | 中学 | 47.37% | AGQ-R | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7/7 |
45 | Ng, | 272 | 大学 | 25.00% | PALS | MAP/PAP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/5 |
46 | Ollfors, | 903 | 中学 | 46.00% | PALS | MAP/PAP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7 |
47 | Omer Shehzad, | 321 | 大学 | 40.50% | AGQ-R | MVP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/4/3 |
48 | Pajares, | 529 | 中学 | 51.80% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7/7 |
49 | Pajares, | 497 | 中学 | 49.70% | PALS | MAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/6 |
50 | Palos, | 254 | 大学 | 20.87% | AGQ | MAP/MVP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7/7 |
51 | Phan, | 276 | 大学 | 44.57% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/7/7 |
52 | Phan, | 290 | 大学 | 38.62% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/6/6 |
53 | Robison, | 722 | 中学 | 46.68% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/5/4 |
54 | Fenollar, | 553 | 大学 | 39.96% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/7/7 |
55 | Sha, | 589 | 中学 | 54.16% | PALS | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/4/5/4 |
56 | Singletary, | 144 | 大学 | 37.50% | AGQ | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 4/5/5/4 |
57 | Strand, | 181 | 大学 | 27.62% | PALS | MAP/PAP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/5 |
58 | Tortorici, | 121 | 小学 | 22.31% | PALS | PAP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 5 |
59 | Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, | 572 | 中学 | 43.53% | AGQ | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 标准化测验 | 6/6/6/6 |
60 | Valkyrie, | 500 | 大学 | 36.60% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 4/5/4 |
61 | Wang, | 535 | 小学 | 47.48% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 标准化测验 | 7/7/6 |
62 | Wang, | 376 | 大学 | 63.30% | AGQ-R | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/5/5/5 |
63 | Wei, | 612 | 中学 | 45.10% | AGQ-R | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 3/3/4/5 |
1075 | 中学 | 51.26% | AGQ-R | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 4/4/5/5 | ||
64 | Wolters, | 525 | 中学 | 48.19% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 标准化测验 | 6/5/5 |
65 | Wolters, | 224 | 中学 | 45.54% | PALS | PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/6 |
66 | Zhou, | 164 | 大学 | 15.85% | AGQ | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7/6/6 |
67 | Zychinski, | 133 | 小学 | 57.89% | PALS | MAP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7 |
附表1 纳入元分析的文献及基本信息
编号 | 第一作者及年份 | 样本量 | 年龄阶段 | 性别 比例 | 测量 工具 | 变量关系 | 成绩类型 | 文献质量 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Adkins, | 206 | 大学 | 29.61% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/4/4 |
2 | Antaramian, | 357 | 大学 | 45.94% | AGQ-R | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 4/4/4/4 |
3 | Avci, | 110 | 大学 | 62.73% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7/7 |
4 | Barber, | 270 | 大学 | NA | AGQ | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 标准化测验 | 5/5/5 |
5 | Billotti, | 192 | 中学 | 50.00% | AGQ | MAP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/6/4 |
6 | Bjørnebekk, | 231 | 大学 | 19.48% | AGQ | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 4/5/5/4 |
7 | Blume, | 108 | 中学 | 93.52% | AGQ | PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7 |
8 | Bong, | 375 | 中学 | 0.00% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/6/6 |
9 | Bong, | 647 | 小学 | 55.64% | PALS | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/6/5/6 |
500 | 中学 | 51.00% | PALS | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/6/5/6 | ||
10 | Bong, | 306 | 中学 | 50.98% | AGQ | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/7/6 |
11 | Bubic, | 361 | 中学 | 34.63% | AGQ | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/5/6/7 |
12 | Çakir, | 334 | 中学 | 56.89% | AGQ-R | MVP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7 |
13 | Cao, | 129 | 大学 | 21.71% | AGQ | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7/7/7 |
14 | Carter, | 205 | 大学 | 38.05% | AGQ | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 3/2/3/2 |
15 | Chan, | 1381 | 中学 | 56.92% | AGQ | MAP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7/6 |
16 | Chen, | 508 | 小学 | 58.46% | PALS | PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/6 |
17 | Christian, | 453 | 大学 | 22.96% | PALS | MAP/PAP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/5 |
18 | Curelaru, | 175 | 小学/中学 | 42.86% | PALS | PVP & SE &AP | 标准化测验 | 5 |
19 | D’Lima, | 591 | 大学 | 37.39% | PALS | MAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/6 |
20 | Diseth, | 177 | 大学 | 20.34% | AGQ | MAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/4 |
21 | Diseth, | 229 | 大学 | 33.19% | AGQ | MAP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 4/5/3 |
22 | Ferla, | 512 | 大学 | 13.87% | AGQ | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/7/7 |
23 | Gonida, | 282 | 中学 | 46.10% | PALS | MAP/PAP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/7 |
24 | Guo, | 321 | 小学 | 56.70% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/5/6 |
211 | 小学 | 54.50% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/5/6 | ||
25 | Hunsu, | 171 | 大学 | NA | AGQ | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/5/6 |
26 | Jiang, | 339 | 小学 | 53.69% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/6/6 |
507 | 中学 | 47.93% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/6/6 | ||
27 | Jørgensen Olsen, | 571 | 中学 | 48.69% | AGQ | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 4/5/5/4 |
28 | Kaplan, | 211 | 中学 | 46.45% | PALS | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/5/7/6 |
29 | Karakus, | 98 | 中学 | 45.92% | PALS | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/5/5/4 |
30 | Karlen, | 1215 | 中学 | 43.13% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/7/7 |
31 | Kennedy, | 671 | 大学 | 39.64% | AGQ | MVP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/5/5 |
32 | King, | 588 | 中学 | 42.52% | AGQ-R | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/6/6/6 |
33 | Lau, | 3943 | 小学 | 52.70% | PALS | MAP/PAP & LE &AP | 标准化测验 | 7/7 |
34 | Liem, | 1475 | 中学 | 47.12% | PALS | PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 标准化测验 | 7/5 |
35 | Limpo, | 196 | 中学 | 42.86% | NA | MAP/PAP & SE &AP | 标准化测验 | 4/4 |
36 | Liu, | 2057 | 大学 | NA | PALS | MVP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/7 |
37 | Los, | 315 | 大学 | 37.46% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/5/7 |
38 | Lu, | 316 | 大学 | 48.10% | NA | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7/7 |
39 | Lüftenegger, | 210 | 中学 | 50.48% | AGQ | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7/7 |
40 | Luo, | 1667 | 中学 | 52.73% | AGQ | MAP/MVP/PVP & LE &AP | 标准化测验 | 8/8/8 |
41 | Luo, | 1697 | 中学 | 46.26% | PALS | MAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 标准化测验 | 7/7 |
42 | Luo, | 1939 | 中学 | 53.17% | PALS | MAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 8/8 |
43 | Middleton, | 512 | 中学 | 48.05% | PALS | PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/5 |
44 | Muenks, | 190 | 中学 | 47.37% | AGQ-R | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7/7 |
45 | Ng, | 272 | 大学 | 25.00% | PALS | MAP/PAP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/5 |
46 | Ollfors, | 903 | 中学 | 46.00% | PALS | MAP/PAP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7 |
47 | Omer Shehzad, | 321 | 大学 | 40.50% | AGQ-R | MVP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/4/3 |
48 | Pajares, | 529 | 中学 | 51.80% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7/7 |
49 | Pajares, | 497 | 中学 | 49.70% | PALS | MAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/6 |
50 | Palos, | 254 | 大学 | 20.87% | AGQ | MAP/MVP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7/7 |
51 | Phan, | 276 | 大学 | 44.57% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/7/7 |
52 | Phan, | 290 | 大学 | 38.62% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/6/6 |
53 | Robison, | 722 | 中学 | 46.68% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/5/4 |
54 | Fenollar, | 553 | 大学 | 39.96% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/7/7 |
55 | Sha, | 589 | 中学 | 54.16% | PALS | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/4/5/4 |
56 | Singletary, | 144 | 大学 | 37.50% | AGQ | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 4/5/5/4 |
57 | Strand, | 181 | 大学 | 27.62% | PALS | MAP/PAP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/5 |
58 | Tortorici, | 121 | 小学 | 22.31% | PALS | PAP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 5 |
59 | Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, | 572 | 中学 | 43.53% | AGQ | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 标准化测验 | 6/6/6/6 |
60 | Valkyrie, | 500 | 大学 | 36.60% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 4/5/4 |
61 | Wang, | 535 | 小学 | 47.48% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 标准化测验 | 7/7/6 |
62 | Wang, | 376 | 大学 | 63.30% | AGQ-R | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 5/5/5/5 |
63 | Wei, | 612 | 中学 | 45.10% | AGQ-R | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 3/3/4/5 |
1075 | 中学 | 51.26% | AGQ-R | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 4/4/5/5 | ||
64 | Wolters, | 525 | 中学 | 48.19% | PALS | MAP/PAP/PVP & SE & LE &AP | 标准化测验 | 6/5/5 |
65 | Wolters, | 224 | 中学 | 45.54% | PALS | PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 6/6 |
66 | Zhou, | 164 | 大学 | 15.85% | AGQ | MAP/MVP/PAP/PVP & SE &AP | 课程测验 | 7/7/6/6 |
67 | Zychinski, | 133 | 小学 | 57.89% | PALS | MAP & LE &AP | 课程测验 | 7 |
(*为纳入元分析的文献) | |
[1] | 陈陈. (2023). 课堂目标结构对小学生学业发展与心理健康的影响——成就目标中介作用在横向和纵向研究中的一致性. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), (3), 63-77. |
[2] | 陈松. (2011). 自我调节学习中成就目标的动机效应研究 (博士学位论文). 华东师范大学, 上海. |
[3] | 程阳春, 黄瑾. (2023). 近似数量系统与数学能力的关系:一项元分析. 心理发展与教育, 39(3), 379-390. |
[4] | 党宝宝, 祁生琴. (2022). 学生成就目标定向的结构维度、理论依据及对学业发展的影响. 当代教育与文化, 14(1), 46-54. |
[5] |
邓小平, 罗秀文, 邬雨臻. (2016). 父母卷入在家庭社会经济地位与学业成就间的中介作用:元分析结构方程模型. 心理科学进展, 24(12), 1844-1853.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01844 |
[6] | 高峰, 白学军, 章鹏, 曹海波. (2023). 中国青少年父母教养方式与自杀意念的元分析. 心理发展与教育, 39(1), 97-108. |
[7] | 侯金芹. (2019). 成就目标定向的发展轨迹及其对中考的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 27(5), 1006-1011. |
[8] | 黄庆双, 李玉斌, 任永功, 郑玉敏, 黄悦悦. (2019). 大学生成就目标定向对在线学习投入影响研究:学业拖延的中介作用. 现代远距离教育, 185(5), 77-85. |
[9] | 蒋京川, 刘华山. (2005). 中学生成就目标定向与学习策略、学业成绩的关系研究. 心理发展与教育, 21(2), 56-61. |
[10] | 姜怡. (2022). 高中生学习动机发展模态及其对学业成绩的影响. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 40(11), 80-91. |
[11] | 靳娟娟, 邵蕾, 黄潇潇, 张亚利, 俞国良. (2023). 社会排斥与攻击的关系:一项元分析. 心理学报, 55(12), 1-19. |
[12] | 库尔特·勒温. (2011). 拓扑心理学原理. 北京: 商务印书馆. |
[13] | 刘在花. (2022). 成就目标定向对中学生学习满意度的影响机制——学业自我效能感和学习投入的链式中介作用. 教育研究与实验, (5), 98-103. |
[14] | 刘志国, 齐冰, 李亚平, 王润洲, 崔佳, 宋耀武. (2023). 成就目标定向在学业自我概念与学业成绩关系中的调节作用:基于内/外参照模型. 心理发展与教育, 39(1), 68-76. |
[15] | 孟现鑫, 陈怡静, 王馨怡, 袁加锦, 俞德霖. (2023). 学校联结与抑郁的关系:一项三水平元分析. 心理科学进展, 32(2), 246-263. |
[16] | 秦红芳. (2015). 中国学生成就目标的结构特征与形成机制 (博士学位论文). 东北师范大学, 长春. |
[17] |
王嘉莹, 姚梅林, 刘红瑞. (2022). 成就目标与教师效能感、焦虑、工作投入的关系:基于变量中心和个体中心的视角. 心理与行为研究, 20(1), 122-129.
doi: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.01.018 |
[18] | 王莉华, 高源月. (2021). 研究型大学研究生成就目标定向与学业拖延——学业自我效能感的中介效应. 研究生教育研究, 63(3), 26-34. |
[19] | 王一军. (2015). 服务学生自主发展的大学课程. 教育发展研究, 35(17), 40-49. |
[20] | 颜志强, 苏彦捷. (2018). 共情的性别差异:来自元分析的证据. 心理发展与教育, 34(2), 129-136. |
[21] | 杨舒文, 潘斌, 王婷婷, 司继伟. (2018). 小学生成就目标定向与学业成绩的双向关系:一项交叉滞后分析. 心理与行为研究, 16(1), 81-87. |
[22] | 杨晓超. (2019). 高师学生成就目标定向与学业成就的关系——一个多重中介模型 (硕士学位论文). 山西师范大学, 太原. |
[23] | 尹睿, 徐欢云. (2017). 在线学习投入结构模型构建——基于结构方程模型的实证分析. 开放教育研究, 23(4), 101-111. |
[24] | 张文新, 陈光辉. (2009). 发展情境论——一种新的发展系统理论. 心理科学进展, 17(4), 736-744. |
[25] |
张亚利, 李森, 俞国良. (2019). 自尊与社交焦虑的关系:基于中国学生群体的元分析. 心理科学进展, 27(6), 1005-1018.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01005 |
[26] | 朱丽雅. (2012). 大学生成就动机、成就目标定向、学业自我效能对成绩的影响模式探析 (博士学位论文). 吉林大学, 长春. |
[27] | * Adkins, S. J. (2006). The relations of self-regulated learning to public speaking anxiety and achievement (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Houston. |
[28] | Albert, M. A., & Dahling, J. J. (2016). Learning goal orientation and locus of control interact to predict academic self-concept and academic performance in college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 245-248. |
[29] | Alhadabi, A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2020). Grit, self-efficacy, achievement orientation goals, and academic performance in university students. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 519-535. |
[30] | Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271. |
[31] | * Antaramian, S. (2017). The importance of very high life satisfaction for students’ academic success. Cogent Education, 4(1), Article 1307622. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1307622 |
[32] | Assink, M., & Wibbelink, C. J. (2016). Fitting three-level meta-analytic models in R: A step-by-step tutorial. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12(3), 154-174. |
[33] | * Avci, U., & Durak, H. Y. (2023). Innovative thinking skills and creative thinking dispositions in learning environments: Antecedents and consequences. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, Article 101225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101225 |
[34] |
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191 pmid: 847061 |
[35] | Baranik, L. E., Stanley, L. J., Bynum, B. H., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Examining the construct validity of mastery- avoidance achievement goals: A meta-analysis. Human Performance, 23(3), 265-282. |
[36] | * Barber, M. E. (2010). Students’ prior knowledge, ability, motivation, test anxiety, and course engagement as predictors of learning in community college psychology courses (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Florida, Gainesville. |
[37] | Bardach, L., Oczlon, S., Pietschnig, J., & Lüftenegger, M. (2020). Has achievement goal theory been right? A meta-analysis of the relation between goal structures and personal achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1197-1220. |
[38] | * Billotti, S. (2009). Achievement goals, engagement and achievement of African American and White middle school students (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Fordham University, New York. |
[39] |
* Bjørnebekk, G., Diseth, A., & Ulriksen, R. (2013). Achievement motives, self-efficacy, achievement goals, and academic achievement at multiple stages of education: A longitudinal analysis. Psychological Reports, 112(3), 771-787.
pmid: 24245072 |
[40] | * Blume, F., Irmer, A., Dirk, J., & Schmiedek, F. (2022). Day-to-day variation in students’ academic success: The role of self-regulation, working memory, and achievement goals. Developmental Science, 25(6), Article 13301. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13301 |
[41] | * Bong, M. (2005). Within-grade changes in Korean girls’ motivation and perceptions of the learning environment across domains and achievement levels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 656-672. |
[42] | * Bong, M. (2009). Age-related differences in achievement goal differentiation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 879-896. |
[43] | * Bong, M., Hwang, A., Noh, A., & Kim, S.-i. (2014). Perfectionism and motivation of adolescents in academic contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 711-729. |
[44] | Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, Britain: John Wiley & Sons. |
[45] |
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random- effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 97-111.
doi: 10.1002/jrsm.12 pmid: 26061376 |
[46] | * Bubic, A., Krile, K., & Kuzman, I. (2015). The importance of achievement goals and attitudes towards education for explaining adolescents’ career decision self-efficacy. Drustvena Istrazivanja, 24(3), 387-405. |
[47] | Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 26-48. |
[48] | * Çakir, O. E., & Gazioğlu, A. E. I. (2021). The role of psychological and academic variables in predicting transition from primary to secondary education exam achievement in Turkey. Psychology in the Schools, 58(9), 1858-1876. |
[49] | * Cao, L. (2012). Examining ‘active’ procrastination from a self-regulated learning perspective. Educational Psychology, 32(4), 515-545. |
[50] | * Carter, C. M. (2012). Academic and athletic motivation as predictors of academic performance of division I college student-athletes (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). The University of Oklahoma, Norman. |
[51] | Cellar, D. F., Stuhlmacher, A. F., Young, S. K., Fisher, D. M., Adair, C. K., Haynes, S.,... Riester, D. (2010). Trait goal orientation, self-regulation, and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(4), 467-483. |
[52] | * Chan, K.-W., Wong, A. K.-Y., & Lo, E. S.-C. (2012). Relational analysis of intrinsic motivation, achievement goals, learning strategies and academic achievement for Hong Kong secondary students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(2), 230-243. |
[53] | * Chen, J. A., & Pajares, F. (2010). Implicit theories of ability of grade 6 science students: Relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 75-87. |
[54] | Cheng, W., & Nguyen, P. N. T. (2023). Gender differences in future time perspectives and risk of being not in employment, education, or training: The mediating role of achievement goal motivations. Current Psychology, 42(32), 28180-28190. |
[55] | Cheung, M. W. L. (2015). Meta-analysis: A structural equation modeling approach. Chichester, Britain: John Wiley & Sons. |
[56] |
Cheung, M. W. L., & Chan, W. (2005). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach. Psychological Methods, 10(1), 40-64.
doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.40 pmid: 15810868 |
[57] | Cheung, M. W. L., & Cheung, S. F. (2016). Random-effects models for meta-analytic structural equation modeling: Review, issues, and illustrations. Research Synthesis Methods, 7(2), 140-155. |
[58] | * Christian, M. (2017). Modeling the relationship between students’ self-perceptions, goals, and achievement motivation (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of California, Riverside. |
[59] | * Curelaru, V., Muntele-Hendres, D., Diac, G., & Duca, D.-S. (2020). Children’s and mothers’ achievement goal orientations and self-efficacy: Dyadic contributions to students’ well-being. Sustainability, 12(5), Article 1785. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051785 |
[60] | * D’Lima, G. M., Winsler, A., & Kitsantas, A., (2014). Ethnic and gender differences in first-year college students’ goal orientation, self-efficacy, and extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Educational Research, 107(5), 341-356. |
[61] | Diaconu-Gherasim, L. R., Tepordei, A.-M., Măirean, C., & Rusu, A. (2018). Intelligence beliefs, goal orientations and children’s academic achievement: Does the children’s gender matter? Educational Studies, 45(1), 1-18. |
[62] | * Diseth, A. (2011). Self-efficacy, goal orientations and learning strategies as mediators between preceding and subsequent academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 191-195. |
[63] | * Diseth, A., & Kobbeltvedt, T. (2010). A mediation analysis of achievement motives, goals, learning strategies, and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 671-687. |
[64] | Đuranović, M. (2019). Classroom quality in final grades of lower secondary education: Demographic differences and relationship with target learning orientations. Croatian Journal of Education, 21(1), 11-31. |
[65] | Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048. |
[66] | Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273. |
[67] | Eccles, J., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage-environment fit:Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. In R. E. Ames, & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. 3: Goals and cognitions (pp. 139-186). New York, America: Academic Press. |
[68] | Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218-232. |
[69] | Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461-475. |
[70] |
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501 pmid: 11300582 |
[71] | Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 613-628. |
[72] | Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2001). Achievement goals and the hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 139-156. |
[73] |
Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5-12.
pmid: 3346808 |
[74] | * Fenollar, P., Román, S., & Cuestas, P. J. (2007). University students’ academic performance: An integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 873-891. |
[75] | * Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Schuyten, G. (2010). Judgments of self-perceived academic competence and their differential impact on students’ achievement motivation, learning approach, and academic performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25(4), 519-536. |
[76] | Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74-78. |
[77] | * Gonida, E. N., & Cortina, K. S. (2014). Parental involvement in homework: Relations with parent and student achievement- related motivational beliefs and achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 376-396. |
[78] | Guo, J., Hu, X., Elliot, A. J., Marsh, H. W., Murayama, K., Basarkod, G.,... Dicke, T. (2023). Mastery-approach goals: A large-scale cross-cultural analysis of antecedents and consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(2), 397-420. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000436 |
[79] | * Guo, M., & Leung, F. K. S. (2021). Achievement goal orientations, learning strategies, and mathematics achievement: A comparison of Chinese Miao and Han students. Psychology in the Schools, 58(1), 107-123. |
[80] | Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 562-575. |
[81] | Henri, D. C., Morrell, L. J., & Scott, G. W. (2017). Student perceptions of their autonomy at university. Higher Education, 75(3), 507-516. |
[82] | Huang, C. (2012). Discriminant and criterion-related validity of achievement goals in predicting academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 48-73. |
[83] |
Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 422-449.
doi: 10.1037/a0018947 pmid: 20438145 |
[84] | * Hunsu, N. J., Olaogun, O. P., Oje, A. V., Carnell, P. H., & Morkos, B. (2023). Investigating students’ motivational goals and self-efficacy and task beliefs in relationship to course attendance and prior knowledge in an undergraduate statics course. Journal of Engineering Education, 112(1), 108-124. |
[85] |
Jak, S., Li, H., Kolbe, L., de Jonge, H., & Cheung, M. W. (2021). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling made easy: A tutorial and web application for one-stage MASEM. Research Synthesis Methods, 12(5), 590-606.
doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1498 pmid: 34043279 |
[86] | * Jiang, Y., Song, J., Lee, M., & Bong, M. (2014). Self-efficacy and achievement goals as motivational links between perceived contexts and achievement. Educational Psychology, 34(1), 92-117. |
[87] | * Jørgensen Olsen, T. M., & Mehus, I. (2022). Students’ performance in physical education: The role of differential achievement goals and self-regulated learning. Education Sciences, 12(2), Article 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020142 |
[88] | Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in higher education, 38(5), 758-773. |
[89] | * Kaplan, A., Lichtinger, E., & Gorodetsky, M. (2009). Achievement goal orientations and self-regulation in writing: An integrative perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 51-69. |
[90] | Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2006). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 141-184. |
[91] | * Karakus, M. (2016). Understanding the mastery-avoidance goals construct: An investigation among middle school students in two domains (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Temple University, Philadelphia. |
[92] | * Karlen, Y., Suter, F., Hirt, C., & Merki, K. M. (2019). The role of implicit theories in students’ grit, achievement goals, intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, and achievement in the context of a long-term challenging task. Learning and Individual Differences, 74, Article 101757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101757 |
[93] | Katz-Vago, I., & Benita, M. (2023). Mastery-approach and performance-approach goals predict distinct outcomes during personal academic goal pursuit. British Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12645 |
[94] | * Kennedy, G. J., & Tuckman, B. W. (2013). An exploration into the influence of academic and social values, procrastination, and perceived school belongingness on academic performance. Social Psychology of Education, 16(3), 435-470. |
[95] | * King, R. B., & McInerney, D. M. (2014). The work avoidance goal construct: Examining its structure, antecedents, and consequences. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(1), 42-58. |
[96] | Kitsantas, A., Steen, S., & Huie, F. (2009). The role of self-regulated strategies and goal orientation in predicting achievement of elementary school children. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(1), 65-81. |
[97] | Kumar, S., Agarwal, M., & Agarwal, N. (2021). Defining and measuring academic performance of Hei students-a critical review. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 3091-3105. |
[98] | * Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). Interplay between personal goals and classroom goal structures in predicting student outcomes: A multilevel analysis of person-context interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 15-29. |
[99] | Lee, J., & Shute, V. J. (2010). Personal and social-contextual factors in K-12 academic performance: An integrative perspective on student learning. Educational Psychologist, 45(3), 185-202. |
[100] | Lee, J., & Stankov, L. (2018). Non-cognitive predictors of academic achievement: Evidence from TIMSS and PISA. Learning and Individual Differences, 65, 50-64. |
[101] | * Liem, A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 486-512. |
[102] | * Limpo, T., & Alves, R. A. (2017). Relating beliefs in writing skill malleability to writing performance: The mediating role of achievement goals and self-efficacy. Journal of Writing Research, 9(2), 97-125. |
[103] | * Liu, X., Gao, X., & Ping, S. (2019). Post-1990s college students academic sustainability: The role of negative emotions, achievement goals, and self-efficacy on academic performance. Sustainability, 11(3), Article 775. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030775 |
[104] | Lochbaum, M., & Gottardy, J. (2015). A meta-analytic review of the approach-avoidance achievement goals and performance relationships in the sport psychology literature. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4(2), 164-173. |
[105] | * Los, R., & Schweinle, A. (2019). The interaction between student motivation and the instructional environment on academic outcome: A hierarchical linear model. Social Psychology of Education, 22(2), 471-500. |
[106] | * Lu, B., Deng, Y., Yao, X., & Li, Z. (2022). Learning goal orientation and academic performance: A dynamic model. Journal of Career Assessment, 30(2), 329-344. |
[107] | * Lüftenegger, M., Kollmayer, M., Bergsmann, E., Jöstl, G., Spiel, C., & Schober, B. (2015). Mathematically gifted students and high achievement: The role of motivation and classroom structure. High Ability Studies, 26(2), 227-243. |
[108] | * Luo, W., Aye, K. M., Hogan, D., Kaur, B., & Chan, M. C. Y. (2013). Parenting behaviors and learning of Singapore students: The mediational role of achievement goals. Motivation and Emotion, 37(2), 274-285. |
[109] | * Luo, W., Paris, S. G., Hogan, D., & Luo, Z. (2011). Do performance goals promote learning? A pattern analysis of Singapore students’ achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(2), 165-176. |
[110] | * Luo, Z., & Luo, W. (2022). Discrete achievement emotions as mediators between achievement goals and academic engagement of Singapore students. Educational Psychology, 42(6), 749-766. |
[111] | Magni, F., Gong, Y., & Chao, M. M. (2021). A longitudinal examination of the reciprocal relationship between goal orientation and performance: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 179, Article 110960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110960 |
[112] |
Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 133-163.
doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00010.x pmid: 26151468 |
[113] | Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 351-373. |
[114] | * Middleton, M. J., & Midgley, C. (2002). Beyond motivation: Middle school students’ perceptions of press for understanding in math. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(3), 373-391. |
[115] |
Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., Middleton, M., Maehr, M. L., Urdan, T., Anderman, L. H.,... Roeser, R. (1998). The development and validation of scales assessing students’ achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(2), 113-131.
pmid: 9576837 |
[116] | Möcklinghoff, S., Rapoport, O., Heckel, C., Messerschmidt- Grandi, C., & Ringeisen, T. (2023). Relationships between achievement goal orientations, multidimensional test anxiety, and performance-In conclusion, every facet counts. Learning and Individual Differences, 102, Article 102269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102269 |
[117] | Moeyaert, M., Ugille, M., Beretvas, S. N., Ferron, J., Bunuan, R., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2017). Methods for dealing with multiple outcomes in meta-analysis: A comparison between averaging effect sizes, robust variance estimation and multilevel meta-analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 559-572. |
[118] | Möller, J., Pohlmann, B., Köller, O., & Marsh, H. W. (2009). A meta-analytic path analysis of the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1129-1167. |
[119] | Mouratidis, A., Michou, A., Demircioğlu, A. N., & Sayil, M. (2018). Different goals, different pathways to success: Performance-approach goals as direct and mastery-approach goals as indirect predictors of grades in mathematics. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 127-135. |
[120] | * Muenks, K., Yang, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2018). Associations between grit, motivation, and achievement in high school students. Motivation Science, 4(2), 158-176. |
[121] | Müller, F. H., Thomas, A. E., Carmignola, M., Dittrich, A. K., Eckes, A., Großmann, N.,... Bieg, S. (2021). University students’ basic psychological needs, motivation, and vitality before and during COVID-19: A self-determination theory approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 775804. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.775804 |
[122] | Neubauer, A. B., Schmidt, A., Schmiedek, F., & Dirk, J. (2022). Dynamic reciprocal relations of achievement goals with daily experiences of academic success and failure: An ambulatory assessment study. Learning and Instruction, 81, Article 101617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101617 |
[123] | * Ng, C. (2017). Distance learners' multiple goals, learning and achievement in different learning situations. Distance Education, 38(1), 37-58. |
[124] | Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328-346. |
[125] | Niepel, C., Brunner, M., & Preckel, F. (2014). Achievement goals, academic self-concept, and school grades in mathematics: Longitudinal reciprocal relations in above average ability secondary school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(4), 301-313. |
[126] | Noordzij, G., Giel, L., & van Mierlo, H. (2021). A meta- analysis of induced achievement goals: The moderating effects of goal standard and goal framing. Social Psychology of Education, 24(1), 195-245. |
[127] | * Ollfors, M., & Andersson, S. I. (2022). Influence of personality traits, goals, academic efficacy, and stressload on final grades in swedish high school students. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(7), 1204-1220. |
[128] | * Omer Shehzad, M. (2019). Achievement goals and academic achievement: The mediating role of learning strategies. Foundation University Journal of Psychology, 3(1), 1-23. |
[129] | * Pajares, F. (2010). Toward a positive psychology of academic motivation. Journal of Educational Research, 95(1), 27-35. |
[130] |
* Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (2001). Gender differences in writing motivation and achievement of middle school students: A function of gender orientation? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(3), 366-381.
pmid: 11414726 |
[131] | * Palos, R., Magurean, S., & Petrovici, M. C. (2019). Self-Regulated learning and academic performance: The mediating role of students’ achievement goals. Revista De Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala, 67, 234-249. |
[132] |
Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 128-150.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.128 pmid: 17227156 |
[133] |
Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2005). On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 175-181.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.175 pmid: 15641898 |
[134] | * Phan, H. P. (2009). Relations between goals, self-efficacy, critical thinking and deep processing strategies: A path analysis. Educational Psychology, 29(7), 777-799. |
[135] | * Phan, H. P. (2010). Students' academic performance and various cognitive processes of learning: An integrative framework and empirical analysis. Educational Psychology, 30(3), 297-322. |
[136] | Preckel, F., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Kleine, M. (2008). Gender differences in gifted and average-ability students: Comparing girls' and boys' achievement, self-concept, interest, and motivation in mathematics. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(2), 146-159. |
[137] | Qian, Q., & Lau, K. L. (2022). The effects of achievement goals and perceived reading instruction on Chinese student reading performance: Evidence from PISA 2018. Journal of Research in Reading, 45(1), 137-156. |
[138] |
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353-387.
doi: 10.1037/a0026838 pmid: 22352812 |
[139] | * Robison, K. A. (2002). Student perceptions of middle school: relation to academic motivation, learning strategies, and academic achievement in science (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Tulane University, New Orleans. |
[140] | Sajedifard, M., & Sajedifard, Z. (2022). High school students’ achievement goal adoption: Evidence from neglected rural high schools in Iran. International Journal of Education and Learning, 4(1), 58-64. |
[141] | Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). “Yes, I can, I feel good, and I just do it!” on gain cycles and spirals of efficacy beliefs, affect, and engagement. Applied Psychology, 60(2), 255-285. |
[142] | Senko, C. (2019). When do mastery and performance goals facilitate academic achievement? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, Article 101795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101795 |
[143] | Senko, C., & Dawson, B. (2017). Performance-approach goal effects depend on how they are defined: Meta-analytic evidence from multiple educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(4), 574-598. |
[144] | * Sha, T. L. (2010). Motivational beliefs, ethnic identity, and sense of belonging: Relations to school engagement and academic achievement (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Houston. |
[145] | * Singletary, G. (2010). Predicting academic achievement of nontraditional college students (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Kentucky, Lexington. |
[146] | * Strand, K. H. (2009). Behavioral effects of consideration of future consequences and time perspective on self-regulation and procrastination in mastery and performance-oriented college students (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Kentucky, Lexington. |
[147] | Tan, D. A., Cordova, C. C., Saligumba, I. P. B., & Segumpan, L. L. B. (2019). Development of valid and reliable teacher- made tests for grade 10 mathematics. International Journal of English and Education, 8(1), 62-83. |
[148] | * Tortorici, K. M. (2015). Examining the role of classroom environment on peer comparisons and academic outcomes among preadolescents (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Fordham University, New York. |
[149] | Udosen, A. E. (2014). Learner autonomy and curriculum delivery in higher education: The case of university of Uyo, Nigeria. International Education Studies, 7(3), 40-50. |
[150] | Urdan, T., & Schoenfelder, E. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 331-349. |
[151] | * Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E., & Senay, A. (2015). Predicting chemistry achievement through task value, goal orientations, and self-efficacy: A structural model. Croatian Journal of Education-Hrvatski Časopis Za Odgoj I Obrazovanje, 17(3), 725-753. |
[152] | * Valkyrie, K. T. (2006). Self-regulated learning: An examination of motivational, cognitive, resource management, metacognitive components and academic outcomes with open admissions community college students (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Houston. |
[153] | Van Yperen, N. W., Blaga, M., & Postmes, T. (2014). A meta- analysis of self-reported achievement goals and nonself- report performance across three achievement domains (work, sports, and education). Plos One, 9(4), Article e93594. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093594 |
[154] | Van Yperen, N. W., Blaga, M., & Postmes, T. (2015). A meta-analysis of the impact of situationally induced achievement goals on task performance. Human Performance, 28(2), 165-182. |
[155] |
VandeWalle, D., & Cummings, L. L. (1997). A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 390-400.
pmid: 9190146 |
[156] |
Viechtbauer, W., & Cheung, M. W. (2010). Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 112-125.
doi: 10.1002/jrsm.11 pmid: 26061377 |
[157] | Vu, T., Magis-Weinberg, L., Jansen, B. R., van Atteveldt, N., Janssen, T. W., Lee, N. C.,... Meeter, M. (2022). Motivation-achievement cycles in learning: A literature review and research agenda. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 39-71. |
[158] | * Wang, J., Bai, B., & Nie, Y. (2023). Examining the role of perceived classroom goal structures and parents’ goals in ESL/EFL learners’ achievement goals, engagement and achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(5), 820-836. |
[159] | * Wang, M. (2018). The antecedents and implications of different purposes of learning: The case of undergraduates and adolescents in China’s Mainland (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Hong Kong. |
[160] |
Wang, Q., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2009). The motivational landscape of early adolescence in the United States and China: A longitudinal investigation. Child Development, 80(4), 1272-1287.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01331.x pmid: 19630908 |
[161] | * Wei, J. (2018). Academic contingent self-worth of adolescents in China’s Mainland: Distinguishing between success and failure as a basis of self-worth (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Hong Kong. |
[162] | Wilby, J. (2022). Motivation, self-regulation, and writing achievement on a university foundation programme: A programme evaluation study. Language Teaching Research, 26(5), 1010-1033. |
[163] | Wirthwein, L., Sparfeldt, J. R., Pinquart, M., Wegerer, J., & Steinmayr, R. (2013). Achievement goals and academic achievement: A closer look at moderating factors. Educational Research Review, 10, 66-89. |
[164] | * Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 236-250. |
[165] | * Wolters, C. A., Fan, W., & Daugherty, S. G. (2013). Examining achievement goals and causal attributions together as predictors of academic functioning. Journal of Experimental Education, 81(3), 295-321. |
[166] | Wu, H., Li, S., Zheng, J., & Guo, J. (2020). Medical students’ motivation and academic performance: The mediating roles of self-efficacy and learning engagement. Medical Education Online, 25(1), Article 1742964. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1742964 |
[167] | Yusuf, T. A., Onifade, C. A., & Bello, O. S. (2016). Impact of class size on learning, behavioral and general attitudes of students in secondary schools in Abeokuta, Ogun State Nigeria. Journal of Research Initiatives, 2(1), 1-16. |
[168] | * Zhou, M., Adesope, O. O., Winne, P. H., & Nesbit, J. C. (2019). Relations of multivariate goal profiles to motivation, epistemic beliefs and achievement. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 13(1), 1-11. |
[169] | * Zychinski, K. E., & Polo, A. J. (2012). Academic achievement and depressive symptoms in low-income Latino youth. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21(4), 565-577. |
[1] | 卫旭华, 焦文颖. 权力接近−抑制行为理论:基于元分析的理论拓展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(2): 274-290. |
[2] | 赵子卿, 余锦婷, 陈嘉彦, 王芸茹, 黄佳, 陈楚侨. 精神病临床高危人群的症状和功能改变:一项系统综述和三水平元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(1): 42-61. |
[3] | 苏涛, 曾浩文, 钟晓琳, 马文聪, 陈修德. 祸福相依:自恋型领导对下属效能双面效应的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(9): 1463-1487. |
[4] | 唐甜, 王雨, 巩芳颍, 石可, 李喜, 刘伟, 陈宁. 家庭教养方式与中国青少年积极发展的关系:系列元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(8): 1302-1314. |
[5] | 孟现鑫, 颜晨, 俞德霖, 高树玲, 傅小兰. 童年创伤与网络成瘾关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(7): 1087-1103. |
[6] | 文思雁, 于旭晨, 金磊, 宫俊如, 张晓函, 孙敬林, 张杉, 吕厚超. 儿童青少年家庭功能障碍与心理健康关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(5): 771-789. |
[7] | 袁悦, 吴志明, 谢秋实. 时间压力对个体工作结果的作用效果: 基于元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(3): 465-485. |
[8] | 尹奎, 迟志康, 董念念, 李培凯, 赵景. 团队反思与团队资源开发、利用及团队结果的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(2): 228-245. |
[9] | 孟现鑫, 陈怡静, 王馨怡, 袁加锦, 俞德霖. 学校联结与抑郁的关系:一项三水平元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(2): 246-263. |
[10] | 韩志伟, 程延园, 任志帅, 王丹阳, 李国静. 工作连通行为与工作−生活冲突的元分析:基于工作−家庭资源模型的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(12): 2031-2049. |
[11] | 诸彦含, 贺彬, 孙蕾. 状态权力感对亲社会行为的影响:一项三水平元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(11): 1786-1799. |
[12] | 蒋建武, 龙晗寰, 胡洁宇. 工作场所人工智能应用对员工影响的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(10): 1621-1639. |
[13] | 刘红艳, 周泳含, 陈艳霞. 次优食品营销干预策略的有效性探究:来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(10): 1640-1658. |
[14] | 康丹, 文敏, 张颖杰. 儿童精细动作技能与数学能力的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(8): 1443-1459. |
[15] | 李莹, 赵鸿瑜, 张木军, 范子璇, 王悦. 执行控制的双语优势效应及其调节变量:来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(6): 970-987. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||