ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办：中国科学院心理研究所
出版：科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (11): 1898-1909.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.01898

• 元分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

 青少年偏差行为的同伴选择和影响效应：基于纵向社会网络的元分析

 邓小平1,2;  徐 晨2;  程懋伟3;  张向葵4   

  1.  (1赣南师范大学教育经济研究中心; 2赣南师范大学教育科学学院; (3江西省赣州市第十一中学, 赣州 341000) (4东北师范大学心理学院, 长春 130024)
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-17 出版日期:2017-11-15 发布日期:2017-09-25
  • 通讯作者: 邓小平, E-mail: dxp1984@gmail.com E-mail:E-mail: dxp1984@gmail.com
  • 基金资助:
     江西省社会科学规划(15JY54)资助项目, 并得到赣南师范大学招标课题经费资助(14zb15)。

 Peer selection and peer influence: A meta-analysis on social network based research on adolescent delinquency

 DENG Xiaoping1,2; XU Chen2; CHENG Maowei3; ZHANG Xiangkui4   

  1.  (1 The Research Center of Educational Economics, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China) (2 School of Education Science, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China) (3 Ganzhou No.11 Middle School, Ganzhou 341000, China) (4 School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)
  • Received:2017-04-17 Online:2017-11-15 Published:2017-09-25
  • Contact: DENG Xiaoping, E-mail: dxp1984@gmail.com E-mail:E-mail: dxp1984@gmail.com
  • Supported by:
     

PDF (PC)

2709

摘要：  以22篇纵向社会网络分析研究文献(30项独立样本研究, 27746个被试)为对象, 使用元分析技术探讨青少年偏差行为的同伴选择和同伴影响效应假设。结果发现：(1)同伴选择和同伴影响效应都显著, 但同伴影响效应显著大于同伴选择效应; (2)青少年发展阶段在同伴选择和同伴影响过程中存在显著的调节效应。在同伴选择过程中, 青少年早期阶段不显著, 而中、晚期阶段显著; 在同伴影响过程中, 青少年早、中期显著, 晚期阶段不显著。(3)偏差行为类型在同伴选择和同伴影响效应中的调节效应不显著。(4)网络数量在同伴影响过程中存在显著的调节效应, 随着网络数量增加同伴影响效应越可能成立。结论, 中晚期青少年会基于偏差行为相似性选择朋友, 早中期青少年会受朋友的影响而产生偏差行为。

关键词: 青少年偏差行为, 同伴选择, 同伴影响, 纵向社会网络分析, 元分析

Abstract:  Accumulating studies have examined the impact of peer selection and peer influence on adolescent delinquency via longitudinal social network analyses. This meta-analysis aims to synthesize the existing findings. A total of 22 papers that have used longitudinal social network analysis were identified, involving 30 independent samples (N = 27746). The results show that (1) the impacts of both peer selection and peer influence were significant but peer influence exerted stronger impacts; (2) peer selection exerted stronger influences during early stage than during the middle and late stages, whereas peer influence exerted stronger impacts during middle and late stages than during early stage (3) delinquent behavior type did not make a difference. (4) larger number of networks was associated with stronger influence of peer selection and peer influence.

Key words: adolescent delinquency, peer selection, peer influence, longitudinal social network analysis, meta-analysis

中图分类号: