Please wait a minute...
心理学报  2018, Vol. 50 Issue (1): 1-8    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00001
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
 中英流行背景音乐 对大学生中英词汇记忆的影响
高 淇; 白学军
 (教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地; 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300074)
 The influence of Chinese and English background pop music to the memory of Chinese and English words in Chinese undergraduates
 GAO Qi; BAI Xuejun
 (Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of Ministry of Education; Academy of Psychology and Behaviour, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074, China)
全文: PDF(366 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       背景资料
文章导读  
摘要  本研究探讨了无背景音乐、中文流行背景音乐和英文流行背景音乐对熟悉与不熟悉中英字词记忆的影响。以90名通过CET6的大学生为被试。实验1使用熟悉中英名词各32对进行即时回忆任务。实验2增加了任务难度, 使用不熟悉中英字词各10个进行即时再认任务。结果表明, 无音乐条件下记忆量显著高于中英流行音乐条件; 在实验1中, 中文流行音乐条件下对熟悉词汇的回忆量显著低于英文流行音乐条件; 在实验2中, 中英文流行音乐条件下的词汇再认量没有显著差异, 但中文流行音乐条件下对中文不熟悉字词识记干扰更小, 英文流行音乐条件下对英文不熟悉字词识记干扰更小, 提示听觉输入语言熟悉度和视觉任务难度都会影响无关言语效应的大小, 听觉语言熟悉度的影响受视觉任务难度高低的制约。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
高淇
白学军
关键词 中英流行音乐 中英词汇 记忆 无关言语效应    
Abstract: It was generally found that pop music would do harm to the efficiency and accuracy of visual activity when it was as a kind of background music. This is called irrelevant sound effect, which means that the presence of irrelevant sound significantly impairs people’s performance on main visual task. Some researchers believe that the reason of this phenomenon is because the lyrics of the background pop music add extra workload to the working memory, which interferes with the visual task. Moreover, it was shown that the first language lyrics impaired participants’ performance more seriously than a strange language. To participants, the second language is less familiar than the first language but more than a strange language. So how about the irrelevant sound effect when lyrics are participants’ second language? And how about it when the visual task contains the second language? This study aimed to investigate the influence of different language lyrics to the visual memory task, the familiarity of whose materials was different in two experiments. It was hypothesized that there would be significant irrelevant sound effects in different language background musics with different language materials, and languages of the lyrics and materials would have reciprocal actions in both experiments. 180 participants from a university (90 for each experiment)who have passed CET6 (College English Test 6) attended this study to research the effect of lyrics in background pop music on short-term memory for familiar and unfamiliar Chinese and English words. There were three kinds of background sounds: no background sound, Chinese background pop music and English background pop music. In order to control effects caused by instruments, this research used Let it go sung by Yao Beina (Chinese) and Demi Lovato (English) as the background music in both two experiments. Only the refrain was used as music materials. In the first experiment, participants should remember 32 Chinese and 32 English familiar nouns and finish an instant recall task. In the second experiment, participants should remember 10 unfamiliar Chinese and 10 unfamiliar English nouns and finish an instant recognition task. Memory materials were displayed by Eprime 1.0 randomly. In the first experiment, the main effect of music types was significant, F(2,87) = 15.67, p < 0.00, ηp² = 0.15. The scores in the condition of no background music (M = 14.12) were significantly higher than the other two conditions. Participants’ scores in English background pop music (M = 12.50) were significantly higher than that in Chinese background pop music (M = 10.30). In the second experiment, the results showed that the scores in the condition of no background sound (M = 6.87) were still significantly higher than the other two conditions (M = 6.03 for Chinese music, M = 5.83 for English music). F(2,87) = 4.69, p < 0.05, ηp² = 0.05. The difference between two experiments was a significant reciprocal action in the second experiment, F(2,87) = 19.23, p < 0.01, ηp² = 0.20. The scores in the condition of Chinese background pop music were higher when the materials were Chinese words (M = 7.03), and the scores in the condition of English background pop music were higher when the materials were English words (M = 6.93). The conclusion was that lyrics in background music would effect the main visual task no mater what kind of lyrics’ language was, but different familiarity of languages indeed had different influences on the efficiency and accuracy of the main task. When memory words were familiar, the familiar language of lyrics would do more harm to the memory. While the words were unfamiliar, which means the task was more difficult, lyrics would do more harm to the memory of words that with the same language. The level of difficulty of the task and the familiarity of lyrics’ language both can effect the memory, while the former is more important.
Key wordsChinese and English pop music    Chinese and English words    memory    irrelevant sound effect
收稿日期: 2016-10-12      出版日期: 2017-11-28
ZTFLH:     
  B842  
基金资助: 天津市高等学校心理健康与行为调控创新团队、教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(08JJDXLX266)资助。
通讯作者: 白学军, E-mail: bxuejun@126.com   
引用本文:   
高淇, 白学军. (2018).  中英流行背景音乐 对大学生中英词汇记忆的影响. 心理学报, 50(1): 1-8.
GAO Qi, BAI Xuejun. (2018).  The influence of Chinese and English background pop music to the memory of Chinese and English words in Chinese undergraduates. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50(1), 1-8.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00001      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2018/V50/I1/1
[1] 林静远, 林无忌, 孟迎芳. 尼古丁对内隐记忆与外显记忆的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 940-952.
[2] 钟毅平, 张文洁, 李亚蕾, 范伟. 时间压力对错误记忆的影响:情绪的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 929-939.
[3] 王思思,库逸轩. 右侧背外侧前额叶在视觉工作记忆中的因果性作用[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(7): 727-738.
[4] 李毕琴, 李玲, 王爱君, 张明.  言语工作记忆内容在语义水平的注意捕获[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(5): 483-493.
[5] 王静, 薛成波, 刘强.  客体同维度特征的视觉工作记忆存储机制[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(2): 176-185.
[6] 黄羽商, 曹立人. 基于空间方位信息的构型对视觉工作记忆绩效的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(11): 1222-1234.
[7] 潘东旎,王道湍,李雪冰. 基于手机APP的双维n-back训练的认知与情绪效益[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(10): 1105-1119.
[8] 王婷,关宇霞,关红英,张积家. 鄂伦春族的视空间工作记忆能力优势:生态环境和生产方式的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(10): 1094-1104.
[9] 刘湍丽, 白学军.  部分线索对记忆提取的影响:认知抑制能力的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(9): 1158-1171.
[10] 朱祖德, 段懿行, 王穗苹.  个体差异对工作记忆训练迁移效果的调节[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(8): 1022-1030.
[11] 张豹, 胡岑楼, 陈颜璋, 缪素媚, 黄赛.  工作记忆与知觉负载对工作记忆表征 引导注意的调节[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(8): 1009-1021.
[12] 林无忌, 孟迎芳, 林静远.  提取干扰对内隐记忆的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(7): 897-908.
[13] 丁晓, 吕娜, 杨雅琳, 司继伟.  工作记忆成分的年龄相关差异 对算术策略运用的预测效应[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(6): 759-770.
[14] 李腾飞, 马 楠, 胡中华, 刘 强.  空间距离对视觉工作记忆巩固的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(6): 711-722.
[15] 李松泽;胡金生;李骋诗; 王琦;何建青;王妍; 杨翠萍. 高功能孤独症幼儿空间工作记忆的组块加工缺陷[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(5): 631-642.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn