ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (7): 1049-1062.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.01049

• 研究报告 •    下一篇

奖赏预测误差对时间顺序记忆和来源记忆的影响

张弘弛, 成旋, 毛伟宾()   

  1. 山东师范大学心理学院, 济南 250358
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-15 发布日期:2023-04-21 出版日期:2023-07-25
  • 通讯作者: 毛伟宾, E-mail: wb_mao@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2021MC081);山东师范大学“工作记忆的认知及脑机制”科研创新团队资助

The effect of reward prediction errors on temporal order and source memory

ZHANG Hongchi, CHENG Xuan, MAO Weibin()   

  1. School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China
  • Received:2022-09-15 Online:2023-04-21 Published:2023-07-25

摘要:

先前研究表明, 事件边界会增强边界处来源记忆、削弱跨边界的时间顺序记忆, 但对于两者之间是否存在一种权衡关系, 以及内在的、具有社会性意义的变化作为事件边界是如何影响记忆的, 尚鲜有研究。本研究以奖赏预测误差(reward prediction errors, RPE)作为事件边界, 通过两个行为实验和一个ERP实验, 探讨RPE事件边界对时间顺序记忆和来源记忆的影响。结果发现, RPE事件边界增强了边界处信息的来源记忆, 高RPE事件边界引发了记忆权衡效应; 相对于事件内/非边界条件, 跨事件/边界条件记忆的正确提取诱发出更大的N400波幅, 时间顺序记忆的激活主要集中在头皮中前部, 来源记忆的激活主要集中在头皮中后部。本研究表明, 事件边界的切分强度是影响记忆权衡效应的重要因素, N400成分可能是反映事件边界对情景记忆的整合与切分的重要指标。

关键词: 奖赏预测误差, 事件边界, 时间顺序记忆, 来源记忆, 记忆权衡效应

Abstract:

The human brain automatically segments continuous experiences into discrete events to better remember ongoing experiences in daily life. This automatic process is known as event segmentation. The time points between different events are called event boundaries—they indicate when one event ends, and another begins. Studies have shown that the event boundaries may enhance the item-context source memory of information at the boundaries but impair temporal order memory in across-event information. Notably, previous studies mainly focused on the boundaries caused by changes in the external environment and rarely paid attention to the subjective boundaries caused by changes in an individual’s internal psychological context. Moreover, Rouhani et al. (2020) first confirmed that reward prediction errors (RPE) could be used as event boundaries to influence memory. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that the RPE event boundary reduces the temporal order memory in across-event information. However, the effects of the RPE event boundary on temporal order and source memory and whether the mnemonic trade-off effect exists are not clear. The neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the effects of event boundaries on memory require further examination.

This study used behavioral and event-related potentials (ERP) technology in three experiments to explore the effect of RPE event boundaries on temporal order and source memory, respectively, based on behavioral and neurophysiological mechanisms. Experiment 1 used a neutral scene picture matching value as materials. The value of successive pictures fluctuates around an average value to form an event, and event boundaries denote when there is a significant shift in the value, which is the reward prediction error. The participants were required to complete two memory tests: a temporal order memory test and a source memory test. The source memory test was presented with a neutral scene picture, and participants were asked to choose a value that matched the learning stage from the two alternatives. We aimed to explore the effect of the RPE event boundary on temporal order and source memory. However, no mnemonic trade-off effect was observed. Therefore, whether other factors might influence the mnemonic trade-off effect that exists is not clear. In Experiment 2, RPE was divided into high and low strength. We aimed to explore the effects of different RPE strengths on temporal order and source memory. After we obtained stable results, in Experiment 3, we used ERP technology to explore the N400 and P600 effects under different conditions at the memory retrieval stage in the high RPE condition to examine the detailed mechanism of the effect of event boundary on memory.

The behavioral results showed that the RPE event boundary enhanced only the neutral scene picture-value source memory of information at the boundaries in Experiment 1. High and low RPE event boundaries affect temporal order and source memory differently. The high RPE event boundary enhanced the neutral scene picture-value source memory of information at the boundaries. Further it reduced the temporal order memory of information across-events, which caused the mnemonic trade-off effect between temporal order and source memory in Experiment 2. The ERP results showed that compared to the within-event/non-boundary condition, correctly retrieving information of temporal order and source memory in the across-event/boundary condition induced a larger N400 (350−550ms) effect but did not induce a larger P600 (600−1000ms) effect in Experiment 3. These two memory tests were activated in different brain regions. The temporal order memory in the across-events condition was mainly activated in the anterior region, while the source memory boundary condition was mainly activated in the parietal region.

This study can be summarized as follows. The segmentation strength of the event boundary is an important factor affecting the mnemonic trade-off effect between temporal order and source memory. The mnemonic trade-off effect only occurs when the representation difference between events is sufficiently vast, and the segmentation strength of the boundary is sufficiently high. Furthermore, the N400 component is an important index that reflects the integration and segmentation of episodic memory using event boundaries.

Key words: reward prediction errors, event boundaries, temporal order memory, source memory, mnemonic trade-off effect

中图分类号: