Please wait a minute...
心理学报  2017, Vol. 49 Issue (7): 941-952    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00941
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
 社交网站中的上行社会比较与抑郁的关系: 一个有调节的中介模型及性别差异
 连帅磊;孙晓军;牛更枫;周宗奎
 (青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室; 华中师范大学心理学院, 武汉 430079)
 Upward social comparison on SNS and depression: A moderated mediation model and gender difference
 LIAN Shuailei; SUN Xiaojun; NIU Gengfeng; ZHOU Zongkui
 (Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior (CCNU), Ministry of Education; School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)
全文: PDF(514 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       背景资料
文章导读  
摘要  为明确社交网站中的上行社会比较对青少年抑郁的作用机制, 本研究构建了一个有调节的中介模型, 重点考察了妒忌在二者关系中的中介作用、反刍思维的调节作用及其性别差异。以836名高中生为被试(M = 16.34岁, SD = 1.06), 采用问卷法对社交网站中的上行社会比较、妒忌、反刍思维以及抑郁进行调查。结果显示:(1)在控制性别、年龄、年级、社交网站好友数量以及平均每天使用社交网站频率、时间后, 社交网站上行社会比较对抑郁具有显著的正向预测作用; (2)妒忌能够在社交网站上行社会比较与抑郁的关系中起中介作用, 且这种间接效应会受到反刍思维的调节; (3)有调节的中介模型存在性别差异:与男生相比, 妒忌的中介效应在女生被试群体中更显著; 在男生被试群体中, 妒忌的中介作用会受到反刍思维的调节作用的影响, 而在女生被试群体中, 该调节效应不显著。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
连帅磊
孙晓军
牛更枫
周宗奎
关键词  抑郁 社交网站 上行社会比较 妒忌 反刍思维 青少年    
Abstract: Scholars have started investigating the link between social network site (SNS) use and depression among adolescents, but findings remain inconsistent. In order to find out the reasons, researchers conduct lots of studies, trying to give an interpretation for the relationship and its complex mechanisms from a different perspective. Among many factors influencing adolescents’ depression, the role of upward social comparison on SNS has increasingly received attention of both practitioners and researchers over the past few years. There is substantial literature documenting that upward social comparison on SNS has an important influence on adolescents’ depression, but little is known about the mediating and moderating mechanisms underlying this relation. Therefore, based on the social comparison theory of envy and the response styles theory of rumination, the present study constructed a moderated mediation model to examine the effect of upward social comparison on SNS and the underling mechanisms. Specifically, the present study examined whether upward social comparison on SNS would be indirectly related to adolescents’ depression through the experience of envy during SNS using, and whether this indirect association would be moderated by the adolescents’ rumination. This integrated model can address questions about both mediation and moderation in one model. Its results would be helpful to answer the issues such as “what works for whom”, and provide valuable information for early identification and prevention that cannot be obtained by separately testing the two questions. A total of 836 high school students (mean age = 16.34 years, SD = 1.06) participated in this study. Adolescents’ upward social comparison on SNS was measured by the revised upward social comparison questionnaire. Envy was assessed with the SNS envy scale. The short form of ruminative responses scale was used to assess rumination traits. Adolescents’ depression was assessed with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. All the measures have good reliability and validity. The results showed that: (1) after controlling for age, grade, number of friends on SNS and the frequency and time of SNS use, the upward social comparison on SNS has a positive direct effect on adolescents’ depression. (2) The positive association between upward social comparison and adolescents’ depression was mediated by envy, and there is gender difference in this indirect effect. The indirect effect was stronger for girls than boys. (3) For boys, the mediating effect of envy was moderated by rumination. The indirect effect was stronger for boys with high rumination than for those with low rumination. However, the moderating effect of rumination cannot be found in the indirect effect of envy for girls. These findings contribute to our understanding of how and when upward social comparison on SNS impacts adolescents’ depression. On the one hand, the experience of envy during SNS using relative to the upward social comparison on SNS, may serve as a more important role on the emergence and development of adolescents’ depression. On the other hand, more attention should be paid to the boys with high level of rumination (especially reducing their frequency of upward social comparison on SNS) and boys with high frequency of upward social comparison on SNS (especially reducing their rumination). Last but not the least, the prevention and interventions for adolescents’ depression should pay attention not only to the effect of behavior factors, experience factors and personality trait factors, but also to the combined influence of those factors.
Key words depression    social network site (SNS)    upward social comparison    envy    rumination    adolescents
收稿日期: 2016-05-13      出版日期: 2017-05-26
ZTFLH:     
  B844  
  R395  
基金资助: 国家社科基金重大项目(11&ZD151)、国家自然科学青年基金项目(31400887)和霍英东教育基金会资助。
通讯作者: 孙晓军, E-mail: sunxiaojun@mail.ccnu.edu.cn; 周宗奎, E-mail: zhouzk@mail.ccnu.edu.cn     E-mail: E-mail: sunxiaojun@mail.ccnu.edu.cn; E-mail: zhouzk@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
引用本文:   
连帅磊, 孙晓军, 牛更枫, 周宗奎.  社交网站中的上行社会比较与抑郁的关系: 一个有调节的中介模型及性别差异[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(7): 941-952.
LIAN Shuailei, SUN Xiaojun, NIU Gengfeng, ZHOU Zongkui.  Upward social comparison on SNS and depression: A moderated mediation model and gender difference. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(7): 941-952.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00941      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2017/V49/I7/941
[1] 杨海波;赵欣;汪洋;张磊;王瑞萌; 张毅;王力. PTSD青少年执行功能缺陷的情绪特异性[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(5): 643-652.
[2] 刘庆奇;牛更枫;范翠英;周宗奎. 被动性社交网站使用与自尊和自我概念清晰性:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(1): 60-71.
[3] 周宵;伍新春;曾旻;田雨馨. 青少年的情绪调节策略对创伤后应激障碍和创伤后成长的影响:社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(8): 969-980.
[4] 李董平;周月月;赵力燕;王艳辉;孙文强. 累积生态风险与青少年网络成瘾:心理需要满足和积极结果预期的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(12): 1519-1537.
[5] 牛更枫;孙晓军;周宗奎;孔繁昌;田媛. 基于QQ空间的社交网站使用对青少年抑郁的影响:上行社会比较和自尊的序列中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(10): 1282-1291.
[6] 陈武;李董平;鲍振宙;闫昱文;周宗奎. 亲子依恋与青少年的问题性网络使用:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(5): 611-623.
[7] 陆青云;陶芳标;侯方丽;孙莹. 青少年应激下皮质醇应答与风险决策相关性的性别差异[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(5): 647-655.
[8] 王明忠;范翠英;周宗奎;陈武. 父母冲突影响青少年抑郁和社交焦虑 —— 基于认知-情境理论和情绪安全感理论[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(1): 90-100.
[9] 田录梅,陈光辉,王姝琼,刘海娇,张文新. 父母支持、友谊支持对早中期青少年孤独感和抑郁的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(7): 944-956.
[10] 李董平,张卫,李丹黎,王艳辉,甄霜菊. 教养方式、气质对青少年攻击的影响:独特、差别与中介效应检验[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(2): 211-225.
[11] 崔丽霞;史光远;张玉静;于园. 青少年抑郁综合认知模型及其性别差异[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(11): 1501-1514.
[12] 范方,耿富磊,张岚,朱清. 负性生活事件、社会支持和创伤后应激障碍症状:对汶川地震后青少年的追踪研究[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(12): 1398-1407.
[13] 刘肖岑,桑标,窦东徽. 人际/非人际情境下青少年外显与内隐的自我提升[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(11): 1293-1307.
[14] 徐夫真,张文新. 青少年疏离感与病理性互联网使用的关系:家庭功能和同伴接纳的调节效应检验[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(04): 410-419.
[15] 陈晶,索涛,袁文萍,冯廷勇. 青少年结果预期与评价的ERP研究[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(02): 152-163.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn