Please wait a minute...
心理学报
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
两人问题解决中惯例的测量及其微观发生过程
张梅;辛自强;林崇德
(1中央财经大学社会发展学院心理学系, 北京 100081) (2北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京 100875)
The Measurement and Microgenetic Study of Routines in Two-Person Problem Solving
ZHANG Mei;XIN Ziqiang;Lin Chongde
(1 Department of Psychology at School of Social Development, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China) (2 Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)
全文: PDF(754 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 惯例是一种群体的程序化行为, 类似于思维定势, 其实验测量最早源于Cohen与Bacdayan (1994)发明的TTT扑克牌游戏。研究选取35对两人组被试, 在问题解决的框架下采用微观发生法的思路重新设计实验任务, 探讨了两人问题解决中惯例的表现, 并在此基础上探讨了惯例从无到有的产生过程。结果表明:(1)修改后的40局TTT扑克牌游戏中存在明显的惯例现象, 这可以从可靠性、速度、重复的行动序列、基于特定策略的行为模式和偶尔的次优性5个指标进行验证和描述。(2)惯例的产生是在行为掌握基础上, 不断进行表征重述的结果。这一过程体现了惯例的产生是程序性知识转向陈述性知识、无意识转向有意识、稳定性与可变性的统一。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张梅
辛自强
林崇德
关键词 惯例TTT扑克牌游戏问题解决策略微观发生法    
Abstract:Problem solving is a hot topic in cognitive psychology and has reached many consensuses. For example, it was found that individuals often develop strategies that allow them to perform reliably and fluently. One important finding is the einstellung effect. Recently, research on einstellung effect has extended from single to multiple people. Although most empirical studies adopted the task of Transform The Target (TTT) created by Cohen and Bacdayan (1994), this task has not gained as much attention as Tower of Hanoi because of its obscure validation indexes. Moreover, given lacking of the research on the emergence process of routines, two problems, that is, the consciousness and stability of routines, the influence of declarative knowledge on routines are still remained controversial. The purpose of this research was to modify and validate the indexes of routines, describe the emergence process of routines using the microgenetic method. According to the requirement of the study purpose, an electronic program was developed by us. Seventy undergraduates were recruited and were randomly selected into 35 pairs. This study developed a series of 40 hands TTT games according to the requirement of microgenetic method. The moves, the time, and the scores of each participant in the game were recorded. Payoffs were awarded to each pair of players when the tournament was finished. Firstly, this study demonstrated the universality of the routines in this revised TTT game by modifying the picture and confirmation indexes; secondly, it examined the emergence process of routines underlying the instruction of theory of representation redescription and microgenetic method. The results showed that there were obvious routines in the two persons’ problem solving task—TTT game. This effect could be described and confirmed not only through comparing the beginning and finishing 5 hands but also the 5 indexes according to Cohen and Bacdayan’s study (1994): increasing reliability, increasing speed, repeated action sequences, occasional sub-optimality, and patterned behavior based on defined strategy. Based on aforementioned findings, the results further indicated that the generation of routines is the outcome of representation redecoration that based on subjects’ behavior acquisition. The process could be pictured by measuring the path, rate, breadth, the source of behavior and strategies’ change. During the process, routines transformed from procedural to declarative, from unconsciousness to consciousness. These results firstly indicated that the revised indexes were more reasonable and could depict the routines better. Secondly, based on the results in study 2, the generative theory, which is the famous theory of routines, was improved.
Key wordsRoutines    TTT game    problem solving    strategy    microgenetic method
收稿日期: 2012-11-23      出版日期: 2013-10-25
基金资助:

教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-10-0869)、北京市哲学社会科学规划项目(13JYC016)和中央财经大学科研创新团队支持计划资助。

通讯作者: 辛自强   
引用本文:   
张梅;辛自强;林崇德. 两人问题解决中惯例的测量及其微观发生过程[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.01119.
ZHANG Mei;XIN Ziqiang;Lin Chongde. The Measurement and Microgenetic Study of Routines in Two-Person Problem Solving. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(10): 1119-1130.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.01119      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2013/V45/I10/1119
[1] 王 燕, 林镇超, 侯博文, 孙时进.  生命史权衡的内在机制:动机控制策略的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(6): 783-793.
[2] 丁晓, 吕娜, 杨雅琳, 司继伟.  工作记忆成分的年龄相关差异 对算术策略运用的预测效应[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(6): 759-770.
[3] 莫申江;施俊琦. 情绪劳动策略对主动破坏行为的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(3): 349-358.
[4] 周宵;伍新春;曾旻;田雨馨. 青少年的情绪调节策略对创伤后应激障碍和创伤后成长的影响:社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(8): 969-980.
[5] 郭磊; 郑蝉金; 边玉芳; 宋乃庆; 夏凌翔. 认知诊断计算机化自适应测验中新的选题策略:结合项目区分度指标[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(7): 903-914.
[6] 王慧媛; 隋洁; 张明. 线索靶子关联和搜索策略对注意捕获的作用 ——来自意义线索的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(7): 783-793.
[7] 黄碧娟;封洪敏;司继伟;张杰;王翔艳. 双任务协调、任务呈现方式影响成人算术策略执行:估算证据[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 671-683.
[8] 谌小猛; 刘春玲; 乔福强;戚克敏. 盲人建构陌生环境空间表征的策略及其作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 637-647.
[9] 李文福;童丹丹;邱江;张庆林. 科学发明问题解决的脑机制再探[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(4): 331-342.
[10] 艾继如;张红段;司继伟;卢淳;张堂正. 任务呈现方式、双任务反应顺序影响算术估算策略选择与执行[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(10): 1248-1257.
[11] 张梅;辛自强;林崇德. 三人问题解决中的惯例:测量及合作水平的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(6): 814-825.
[12] 罗照盛;喻晓锋;高椿雷;李喻骏;彭亚风;王 睿;王钰彤. 基于属性掌握概率的认知诊断计算机化自适应测验选题策略[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(5): 679-688.
[13] 戴步云;张敏强;焦璨;黎光明; 朱华伟;张文怡. 基于CD-CAT的多策略RRUM模型及其选题方法开发[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(12): 1511-1519.
[14] 辛自强;韩玉蕾. 小学低年级儿童的等值分数概念发展及干预[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(6): 791-806.
[15] 郭磊;王卓然;王丰;边玉芳. 结合a分层的兼具项目曝光和广义测验重叠率控制的选题策略[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(5): 702-713.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn