心理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (8): 921-932.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00921
• 研究报告 • 下一篇
收稿日期:
2019-06-28
发布日期:
2020-06-28
出版日期:
2020-08-25
通讯作者:
隋雪,李雨桐
E-mail:suixue88@163.com;dearliyutong@163.com
基金资助:
YANG Fan, SUI Xue(), YI Yutong()
Received:
2019-06-28
Online:
2020-06-28
Published:
2020-08-25
Contact:
SUI Xue,YI Yutong
E-mail:suixue88@163.com;dearliyutong@163.com
摘要:
从记忆的角度, 探讨中文阅读中长距离回视的引导机制。采用眼动实验, 操纵了回视条件(实验1)、回视可见性(实验2)、目标词位置及词频变量。结果发现:与不阅读组相比, 阅读组的最初回视误差更小, 定位效率更高; 与可见组相比, 不可见组累积回视距离更大, 且难以正确定位目标; 目标词位置主效应显著, 而词频主效应不显著。结果表明, 回视具有空间选择性, 最初的回视由空间记忆引导, 最初回视后的修正眼跳在文本可见情况下才能正常进行, 而词频这一言语属性对回视没有显著影响, 本研究结果支持了空间编码假设。
中图分类号:
杨帆, 隋雪, 李雨桐. (2020). 中文阅读中长距离回视引导机制的眼动研究. 心理学报, 52(8), 921-932.
YANG Fan, SUI Xue, YI Yutong. (2020). An eye movement study for the guidance mechanism of long-distance regressions in Chinese reading. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(8), 921-932.
词汇类型 | 词汇位置 | 句子举例 | 目标词 |
---|---|---|---|
高频 | 前1/3 | 该作品的宗旨就是为了弘扬中国传统文化。 | 作品 |
中间1/3 | 看到如此混乱的局面委员会觉得十分困惑。 | 委员 | |
后1/3 | 这些村民对这个不速之客的生活充满兴趣。 | 生活 | |
低频 | 前1/3 | 该书院的宗旨就是为了弘扬中国传统文化。 | 书院 |
中间1/3 | 看到如此混乱的局面贵宾会觉得十分困惑。 | 贵宾 | |
后1/3 | 这些村民对这个不速之客的面容充满兴趣。 | 面容 |
表1 实验材料举例
词汇类型 | 词汇位置 | 句子举例 | 目标词 |
---|---|---|---|
高频 | 前1/3 | 该作品的宗旨就是为了弘扬中国传统文化。 | 作品 |
中间1/3 | 看到如此混乱的局面委员会觉得十分困惑。 | 委员 | |
后1/3 | 这些村民对这个不速之客的生活充满兴趣。 | 生活 | |
低频 | 前1/3 | 该书院的宗旨就是为了弘扬中国传统文化。 | 书院 |
中间1/3 | 看到如此混乱的局面贵宾会觉得十分困惑。 | 贵宾 | |
后1/3 | 这些村民对这个不速之客的面容充满兴趣。 | 面容 |
回视条件 | 词频 | 目标词位置 | 最初回视误差 | 最初回视大小 | 累积回视距离 | 回视反应时 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
阅读组 | 高频词 | 前1/3 | 248.97 (68.38) | 436.42 (71.52) | 26.74 (3.45) | 2012 (736) |
中间1/3 | 159.26 (36.31) | 410.63 (63.76) | 23.87 (3.05) | 1804 (577) | ||
后1/3 | 116.20 (41.41) | 373.39 (67.86) | 22.23 (5.38) | 1613 (471) | ||
低频词 | 前1/3 | 252.84 (71.40) | 432.07 (73.97) | 26.35 (3.96) | 1906 (812) | |
中间1/3 | 143.39 (32.19) | 410.57 (47.71) | 23.00 (3.91) | 1863 (642) | ||
后1/3 | 112.11 (36.49) | 353.59 (73.56) | 20.68 (5.69) | 1688 (591) | ||
不阅读组 | 高频词 | 前1/3 | 317.02 (122.25) | 375.64 (137.14) | 30.57 (5.63) | 2234 (743) |
中间1/3 | 202.17 (66.28) | 387.95 (138.31) | 30.52 (9.20) | 1894 (570) | ||
后1/3 | 158.15 (100.56) | 396.33 (151.15) | 29.96 (9.66) | 1756 (680) | ||
低频词 | 前1/3 | 310.23 (114.87) | 376.61 (122.86) | 30.97 (6.54) | 2240 (922) | |
中间1/3 | 211.48 (61.01) | 368.88 (143.83) | 28.52 (6.78) | 1858 (506) | ||
后1/3 | 159.76 (81.62) | 402.25 (125.88) | 30.91 (9.86) | 1925 (607) |
表2 所有实验条件在4个回视指标上的描述统计结果[M (SD)]
回视条件 | 词频 | 目标词位置 | 最初回视误差 | 最初回视大小 | 累积回视距离 | 回视反应时 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
阅读组 | 高频词 | 前1/3 | 248.97 (68.38) | 436.42 (71.52) | 26.74 (3.45) | 2012 (736) |
中间1/3 | 159.26 (36.31) | 410.63 (63.76) | 23.87 (3.05) | 1804 (577) | ||
后1/3 | 116.20 (41.41) | 373.39 (67.86) | 22.23 (5.38) | 1613 (471) | ||
低频词 | 前1/3 | 252.84 (71.40) | 432.07 (73.97) | 26.35 (3.96) | 1906 (812) | |
中间1/3 | 143.39 (32.19) | 410.57 (47.71) | 23.00 (3.91) | 1863 (642) | ||
后1/3 | 112.11 (36.49) | 353.59 (73.56) | 20.68 (5.69) | 1688 (591) | ||
不阅读组 | 高频词 | 前1/3 | 317.02 (122.25) | 375.64 (137.14) | 30.57 (5.63) | 2234 (743) |
中间1/3 | 202.17 (66.28) | 387.95 (138.31) | 30.52 (9.20) | 1894 (570) | ||
后1/3 | 158.15 (100.56) | 396.33 (151.15) | 29.96 (9.66) | 1756 (680) | ||
低频词 | 前1/3 | 310.23 (114.87) | 376.61 (122.86) | 30.97 (6.54) | 2240 (922) | |
中间1/3 | 211.48 (61.01) | 368.88 (143.83) | 28.52 (6.78) | 1858 (506) | ||
后1/3 | 159.76 (81.62) | 402.25 (125.88) | 30.91 (9.86) | 1925 (607) |
回视可见性 | 词频 | 目标词位置 | 最初回视误差 | 最初回视大小 | 累积回视距离 | 回视反应时 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
可见组 | 高频词 | 前1/3 | 275.31 (68.10) | 391.23 (70.06) | 23.76 (1.83) | 1827 (509) |
中间1/3 | 152.24 (35.71) | 392.74 (67.56) | 22.12 (3.61) | 1663 (495) | ||
后1/3 | 93.53 (33.36) | 338.96 (58.62) | 18.24 (3.49) | 1498 (437) | ||
低频词 | 前1/3 | 266.58 (94.40) | 401.30 (98.54) | 23.82 (2.56) | 1802(523) | |
中间1/3 | 162.93 (33.67) | 364.83 (44.58) | 19.92 (2.36) | 1666 (563) | ||
后1/3 | 95.89 (32.92) | 325.91 (64.63) | 18.21 (4.53) | 1579 (472) | ||
不可见组 | 高频词 | 前1/3 | 171.12 (85.65) | 502.00 (92.73) | 23.01 (2.97) | 1948 (504) |
中间1/3 | 133.78 (40.28) | 449.99 (65.31) | 22.61 (4.20) | 2207 (583) | ||
后1/3 | 124.27 (56.12) | 354.42 (91.77) | 19.50 (5.53) | 2005 (423) | ||
低频词 | 前1/3 | 150.41 (68.04) | 524.20 (75.08) | 23.57 (2.85) | 1938 (488) | |
中间1/3 | 136.38 (50.09) | 438.34 (80.93) | 22.48 (3.73) | 2058 (584) | ||
后1/3 | 126.82 (48.44) | 353.43 (67.54) | 20.48 (5.39) | 2049 (552) |
表3 所有实验条件在4个回视指标上的描述统计结果[M (SD)]
回视可见性 | 词频 | 目标词位置 | 最初回视误差 | 最初回视大小 | 累积回视距离 | 回视反应时 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
可见组 | 高频词 | 前1/3 | 275.31 (68.10) | 391.23 (70.06) | 23.76 (1.83) | 1827 (509) |
中间1/3 | 152.24 (35.71) | 392.74 (67.56) | 22.12 (3.61) | 1663 (495) | ||
后1/3 | 93.53 (33.36) | 338.96 (58.62) | 18.24 (3.49) | 1498 (437) | ||
低频词 | 前1/3 | 266.58 (94.40) | 401.30 (98.54) | 23.82 (2.56) | 1802(523) | |
中间1/3 | 162.93 (33.67) | 364.83 (44.58) | 19.92 (2.36) | 1666 (563) | ||
后1/3 | 95.89 (32.92) | 325.91 (64.63) | 18.21 (4.53) | 1579 (472) | ||
不可见组 | 高频词 | 前1/3 | 171.12 (85.65) | 502.00 (92.73) | 23.01 (2.97) | 1948 (504) |
中间1/3 | 133.78 (40.28) | 449.99 (65.31) | 22.61 (4.20) | 2207 (583) | ||
后1/3 | 124.27 (56.12) | 354.42 (91.77) | 19.50 (5.53) | 2005 (423) | ||
低频词 | 前1/3 | 150.41 (68.04) | 524.20 (75.08) | 23.57 (2.85) | 1938 (488) | |
中间1/3 | 136.38 (50.09) | 438.34 (80.93) | 22.48 (3.73) | 2058 (584) | ||
后1/3 | 126.82 (48.44) | 353.43 (67.54) | 20.48 (5.39) | 2049 (552) |
[1] | Baccino, T., & Pynte, J. (1994). Spatial coding and discourse models during text reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(2), 143-155. |
[2] | Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J.(1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation ,(Vol. VIII, pp. 47-89). New York: Academic Press. |
[3] | Bai, X. J., Li, X., & Yan, G. L. (2015). Eye movement control in Chinese reading: A summary over the past 20 years of research. Psychological Development and Education, 31(1), 85-91. |
[ 白学军, 李馨, 闫国利. (2015). 汉语阅读眼动控制:20年研究的总结. 心理发展与教育, 31(1), 85-91.] | |
[4] |
Booth, R. W., & Weger, U. W. (2013). The function of regressions in reading: Backward eye movements allow rereading. Memory and Cognition, 41(1), 82-97.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0244-y URL pmid: 22886737 |
[5] |
Carter, B. T., & Luke, S. G. (2017). Individuals' eye movements in reading are highly consistent across time and trial. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 44(3), 482-492.
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000471 URL pmid: 28816481 |
[6] | Chen, S., Chen, L. J., Yang, X. H., & Yang, Y. F. (2015). The role of discourse context on semantic integration. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(2), 167-175. |
[ 陈双, 陈黎静, 杨晓虹, 杨玉芳. (2015). 语篇背景在语义整合中的作用. 心理学报, 47(2), 167-175.] | |
[7] | Chi, H., Yan, G. L., Xu, X. L., Xia, Y., Cui, L., & Bai, X. J. (2014). The effect of phonetic radicals on identification of Chinese phonograms: Evidence from eye movement. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(9), 1242-1260. |
[ 迟慧, 闫国利, 许晓露, 夏萤, 崔磊, 白学军. (2014). 声旁语音信息对形声字加工的影响——来自眼动研究的证据. 心理学报, 46(9), 1242-1260.] | |
[8] |
Christie, J. M., & Just, M. A. (1976). Remembering the location and content of sentences in a prose passage. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(6), 702-710.
doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.68.6.702 URL |
[9] |
Danna, J., Massendari, D., Furnari, B., & Ducrot, S. (2018). The optimal viewing position effect in printed versus cursive words: Evidence of a reading cost for the cursive font. Acta Psychologica, 188, 110-121.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.06.003 URL pmid: 29908365 |
[10] |
Eskenazi, M. A., & Folk, J. R. (2016). Regressions during reading: The cost depends on the cause. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24(4), 1211-1216.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1200-9 URL pmid: 27873185 |
[11] |
Ferreira, F., Apel, J., & Henderson, J. M. (2008). Taking a new look at looking at nothing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 405-410.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.007 URL pmid: 18805041 |
[12] |
Fischer, M. H. (1999). Memory for word locations in reading. Memory, 7(1), 79-116.
doi: 10.1080/741943718 URL pmid: 10645374 |
[13] | Guan, Y. Y., Song, X. N., Zheng, Y. W., Zhang, Y. L., & Cui, L. (2019). Preview processing of between words and within words in Chinese reading: No word highlighting effect. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(9), 969-981. |
[ 关宜韫, 宋悉妮, 郑玉玮, 张颖靓, 崔磊. (2019). 中文词间词和词内词预视加工的差异:词间阴影的作用. 心理学报, 51(9), 969-981.] | |
[14] |
Guérard, K., Saint-Aubin, J., & Maltais, M. (2013). The role of verbal memory in regressions during reading. Memory and Cognition, 41(1), 122-136.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0243-z URL pmid: 22893066 |
[15] |
Guérard, K., Saint-Aubin, J., Maltais, M., & Lavoie, H. (2014). The role of verbal memory in regressions during reading is modulated by the target word's recency in memory. Memory and Cognition, 42(7), 1155-1170.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0424-z URL pmid: 24879638 |
[16] | Hale, S., Myerson, J., Rhee, S. H., Weiss, C. S., & Abrams, R. A. (1996). Selective interference with the maintenance of location information in working memory. Neuropsychology, 10(2), 228-240. |
[17] | He, L. Y., Huang, Y. Y., Wang, M. X., Meng, Z., & Yan, G. L. (2015). The effects of background noise on Chinese passage reading: An eye movement study. Psychological Science, 38(6), 1290-1295. |
[ 何立媛, 黄有玉, 王梦轩, 孟珠, 闫国利. (2015). 不同背景音对中文篇章阅读影响的眼动研究. 心理科学, 38(6), 1290-1295.] | |
[18] |
Inhoff, A. W., & Weger, U. W. (2005). Memory for word location during reading: Eye movements to previously read words are spatially selective but not precise. Memory and Cognition, 33(3), 447-461.
doi: 10.3758/bf03193062 URL pmid: 16156180 |
[19] | Kennedy, A., Brooks, R., Flynn, L.-A., & Prophet, C. (2003). The reader's spatial code. In R. Radach, J. Hyöna, & H. Deubel (Eds.). In R. Radach, J. Hyöna, & H. Deubel (Eds.).The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research(pp. 193-212). Amsterdam: Elsevier |
[20] | Kennedy, A., & Murray, W. S. (1987). Spatial coordinates and reading: Comments on Monk (1985). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 39(4), 649-656. |
[21] | Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M., & Engbert, R. (2004). Length, frequency and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1/2), 262-284. |
[22] |
Liu, L., & Yan, G. L. (2018). Effect of parafoveal visual attention enhancement in deaf reading: Evidence from disappearing text. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50(7), 715-726.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00715 URL |
[ 刘璐, 闫国利. (2018). 聋人阅读中的副中央凹视觉注意增强效应:来自消失文本的证据. 心理学报, 50(7), 715-726.] | |
[23] | Liu, Z. F., Zhang, Z. J., Pan, Y., Tong, W., & Su, H. (2017). The characteristics of visual word encoding in preview and fixation frames during Chinese reading: Evidences from disappearing text. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(7), 853-865. |
[ 刘志方, 张智君, 潘运, 仝文, 苏衡. (2017). 中文阅读中预视阶段和注视阶段内词汇视觉编码的过程特点:来自消失文本的证据. 心理学报, 49(7), 853-865.] | |
[24] | Ma, G. J., & Zhuang, X. L. (2018). Distributional analyses of word frequency effects in Chinese sentence reading and lexical decision tasks.[J] ournal of Research in Reading, 41(S1), S1823-S196. |
[25] |
Morris, N. (1987). Exploring the visuo-spatial scratch pad. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A Human Experimental Psychology, 39(3), 409-430.
doi: 10.1080/14640748708401796 URL pmid: 3671761 |
[26] |
O'Regan, J. K. (1992). Solving the “real” mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46(3), 461-488.
doi: 10.1037/h0084327 URL pmid: 1486554 |
[27] | Peng, X. L., & Huang, D. (2018). Task difficulty modulates the superiority of visual search in children with autism spectrum disorders. Psychological Science, 41(2), 498-503. |
[ 彭晓玲, 黄丹. (2018). 任务难度对自闭症儿童视觉搜索优势显现的影响. 心理科学, 41(2), 498-503.] | |
[28] | Radach, R., & Kennedy, A. (2013). Eye movements in reading: Some theoretical context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(3), 429-452. |
[29] |
Rawson, K. A., & Miyake, A. (2002). Does relocating information in text depend on verbal or visuospatial abilities? An individual- differences analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(4), 801-806.
doi: 10.3758/bf03196338 URL pmid: 12613686 |
[30] | Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457-1506. |
[31] |
Rayner, K., Binder, K. S., Ashby, J., & Pollatsek, A. (2001). Eye movement control in reading: Word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words. Vision Research, 41 (7), 943-954.
doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00310-2 URL pmid: 11248279 |
[32] |
Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory and Cognition, 14(3), 191-201.
doi: 10.3758/bf03197692 URL pmid: 3736392 |
[33] | Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. |
[34] |
Schotter, E. R., Tran, R., & Rayner, K. (2014). Don't believe what you read (only once): Comprehension is supported by regressions during reading. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1218-1226.
doi: 10.1177/0956797614531148 URL pmid: 24747167 |
[35] | Su, H., Liu, Z. F., & Cao, L. R. (2016). The effects of word frequency and word predictability in preview and their implications for word segmentation in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48(6), 625-636. |
[ 苏衡, 刘志方, 曹立人. (2016). 中文阅读预视加工中的词频和预测性效应及其对词切分的启示:基于眼动的证据. 心理学报, 48(6), 625-636.] | |
[36] | Tanaka, T., Sugimoto, M., Tanida, Y., & Saito, S. (2014). The influences of working memory representations on long-range regression in text reading: An eye-tracking study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 48, 625. |
[37] | Therriault, D. J., & Raney, G. E. (2002). The representation and comprehension of place-on-the-page and text-sequence memory. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(2), 117-134. |
[38] | Vitu, F.(2005). Visual extraction processes and regressive saccades in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Cognitive processes in eye guidance (pp. 1-32). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. |
[39] |
Weger, U. W., & Inhoff, A. W. (2007). Long-range regressions to previously read words are guided by spatial and verbal memory. Memory and Cognition, 35(6), 1293-1306.
doi: 10.3758/bf03193602 URL pmid: 18035628 |
[40] | Yan, G. L., Liu, N. N., Liang, F. F., Liu, Z. F., & Bai, X. J. (2015). The comparison of eye movements between Chinese children and adults when reading disappearing text. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(3), 300-318. |
[ 闫国利, 刘妮娜, 梁菲菲, 刘志方, 白学军. (2015). 中文读者词汇视觉信息获取速度的发展:来自消失文本的证据. 心理学报, 47(3), 300-318.] | |
[41] | Yan, G. L., Xiong, J. P., Zang, C. L., Yu, L. L., Cui, L., & Bai, X. J. (2013). Review of eye-movement measures in reading research. Advances in Psychological Science, 21(4), 589-605. |
[ 闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽, 余莉莉, 崔磊, 白学军. (2013). 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 21(4), 589-605.] | |
[42] | Zang, C. L., Meng, H. X., Bai, X. J., & Yan, G. L. (2013). Advances in landing position effect during reading. Journal of Psychological Science, 36(4), 770-775. |
[ 臧传丽, 孟红霞, 白学军, 闫国利. (2013). 阅读过程中的注视位置效应. 心理科学, 36(4), 770-775.] | |
[43] | Zhao, B. J., Wang, Y. S., Chen, M. J., Li, X., Yan, G. L., & Bai, X. J. (2018). The processing of morpheme and lexical of two-character affects the selection of saccade target during Chinese reading. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 16(6), 721-734.] |
[ 赵冰洁, 王永胜, 陈茗静, 李馨, 闫国利, 白学军. (2018). 双字词整词加工与词素加工在眼跳目标选择中的作用. 心理与行为研究, 16( 6), 721-734.] |
[1] | 庞超, 陈颜璋, 王莉, 杨喜端, 贺雅, 李芷莹, 欧阳小钰, 傅世敏, 南威治. 客体信息在视觉工作记忆编码和维持阶段的不同注意选择模式[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(9): 1397-1410. |
[2] | 李海峰, 林世卿, 万博温. 价值导向的注意刷新及其机制[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(8): 1234-1242. |
[3] | 董天天, 徐璐璐, 贺雯. 积极总是好的吗?积极元刻板印象对工作记忆的影响及其机制[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(8): 1344-1357. |
[4] | 张弘弛, 成旋, 毛伟宾. 奖赏预测误差对时间顺序记忆和来源记忆的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(7): 1049-1062. |
[5] | 龙翼婷, 姜英杰, 崔璨, 岳阳. 奖赏预测误差对项目和联结记忆影响的分离:元记忆的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(6): 877-891. |
[6] | 黄元娜, 江程铭, 刘洪志, 李纾. 风险、跨期和空间决策的决策策略共享:眼动和主观判断的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(6): 994-1015. |
[7] | 郭倩琳, 管健. 记忆对话及身份标识对集体记忆的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(6): 1016-1028. |
[8] | 赵春宇, 郭春彦. 合体字与复合词中联结编码和项目编码的关系[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(4): 513-528. |
[9] | 姜英杰, 马潇潇, 姜元涛, 任吉梅, 龙翼婷. 编码后奖赏影响基于议程的学习:奖赏预期和结果的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(4): 542-555. |
[10] | 刘洪志, 杨钘兰, 李秋月, 魏子晗. 跨期决策中的维度差异偏好:眼动证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(4): 612-625. |
[11] | 曹海波, 兰泽波, 高峰, 于海涛, 李鹏, 王敬欣. 词素位置概率在中文阅读中的作用:词汇判断和眼动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(2): 159-176. |
[12] | 孙亚茹, 刘泽军, 段亚杰, 陈宁, 刘伟. 协作如何减少记忆错误:一项元分析研究[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(11): 1780-1792. |
[13] | 陈悦源, 方卫宁, 郭北苑, 鲍海峰. 作业中断对任务绩效的影响及心理疲劳的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 22-35. |
[14] | 张慢慢, 胡惠兰, 张志超, 李鑫, 汪强, 白学军, 臧传丽. 预测性对快速读者和慢速读者词汇加工的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 79-93. |
[15] | 李妍, 程竞暄, 喻婧. 老年人情景记忆更新的改变:竞争记忆的回溯性干扰[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 106-116. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||