ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (03): 338-346.

• • 上一篇    

贝叶斯网在认知诊断属性层级结构确定中的应用

喻晓锋;丁树良;秦春影;陆云娜   

  1. (1 江西师范大学计算机信息工程学院, 南昌 330027)
    (2 安徽亳州师范高等专科学校计算机系, 亳州 233500)
    (3 江西省南昌市第一中学, 南昌 330003)
  • 收稿日期:2009-12-22 修回日期:1900-01-01 发布日期:2011-03-30 出版日期:2011-03-30
  • 通讯作者: 丁树良

Application of Bayesian Networks to Identify Hierarchical Relation Among
Attributes in Cognitive Diagnosis

YU Xiao-Feng;DING Shu-Liang;QIN Chun-Ying;LU Yun-Na   

  1. (1 Computer Information Engineer College, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330027, China)
    (2 Computer Department, Bozhou teachers College, Bozhou 233500, China) (3 Nanchang No.1 high school, Nanchang 330003, China)
  • Received:2009-12-22 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2011-03-30 Published:2011-03-30
  • Contact: DING Shu-Liang

摘要: K. K. Tatsuoka和她同事研究的规则空间模型(RSM)是一种在国内外有较大影响的认知诊断模型, 但是Tatsuoka的RSM是由学科专家先从已编制的测验中抽取出属性, 然后给出测验的关联Q阵, 再由该Q阵导出属性间的层级关系。已有研究证明, 这种做法所得到的属性间的层级关系难以保证是正确的, 甚至难以保证属性间的层级关系是唯一确定的。这里利用贝叶斯网进行结构学习, 从被试的属性掌握模式中挖掘出属性间的层级关系, 学习所得到的层级关系可以用来验证由RSM中的方法得到的层级关系。模拟实验和实证研究的结果都显示了该方法所得到的属性层级关系是有参考价值的, 可以为命题或测量专家带来有用的信息。

关键词: 规则空间模型, 认知诊断, 贝叶斯网, 结构学习

Abstract: It’s very significant to correctly identify the hierarchical relation among attributes correctly when constructing a diagnosis test. As we know, there are various methods to identify the hierarchical relation among attributes in different cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs). Rule Space Model (RSM) is a kind of great influence CDM which was developed by Tatsuoka and her associates. In RSM, the task of attribute identification is performed after the test items have already been developed. And then an incidence Q matrix can be determined which reflects hierarchical relation. However, in Leighton, Gierl and Hunka’s (2004) Attribute Hierarchy Method (AHM) the organization of attributes(attributes, number of attributes and attribute hierarchical relation) should be determined before developing the test items. In RSM and AHM the importance of correctly identifying the attributes and their hierarchical relation cannot be overstated, and the attributes and their hierarchical relations serve as the most important input variables to the models because they provide the basis for interpreting the results. The hierarchical relation among attributes describes the domain knowledge structures. Understanding the domain knowledge structures in highly specific detail provides a rational basis for proposing and evaluating potential improvements in the measurement of general proficiency. Otherwise, improvement remains largely a trial-and-error process. It has been proved that is not reliable to get the hierarchical relation by analyzing the test items, even the resulting hierarchical relations are not unique.
Now, structure learning of Bayesian Networks would be introduced to study the hierarchical relation from the examinees’ attribute mastery patterns. On the one hand, this paper conducted a simulation study in which Cui, Leighton and Zheng (2006)’s attribute hierarchical relation was employed, and the sample size of 5000 was used. In the simulated study, different sliping rates was considered for the purpose of testing the robustness of Bayesian structure learning. On the other hand, this paper conducted an empirical study to research the attributes which were commonly used in different numeration representation system converting, and the sample size was 189. Also the hierarchical relation generated by Bayesian structure learning and the hierarchical relation extracted by domain expert was compared.
The result of simulation study and empirical study all showed the Bayesian Networks was a very useful tool in determining the hierarchical relation among attributes in the realm of education measurement and psychometrics. It is proved that the result for reference is valuable through structure learning of Bayesian Networks in simulated experiments and practical application. Meanwhile, the Bayesian Networks also can be used to test the hierarchical relation in RSM.

Key words: rule space model, cognitive diagnosis, Bayesian networks, structure learning