ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (07): 809-818.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

大学生负面身体自我认知加工偏好

陈红; 冯文峰;黄希庭   

  1. 认知与人格教育部重点实验室(西南大学),重庆 400715
  • 收稿日期:2007-07-16 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-07-30 发布日期:2008-07-30
  • 通讯作者: 黄希庭

Cognitive Biases among College Students with a Fat or Thin Negative Physical Self

CHEN Hong;FENG Wen-Feng;HUANG Xi-Ting   

  1. Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (Southwest University), Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400715, China
  • Received:2007-07-16 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-07-30 Online:2008-07-30
  • Contact: HUANG Xi-Ting

摘要: 基于负面身体自我图式理论,采用词汇判断任务的实验范式,探讨负面身体自我者的认知加工偏好。研究1考察胖负面身体自我大学生对胖相关的身体信息词加工偏好,结果表明,加工胖身体相关词的编码速度比对照组显著更快,对胖消极和隐喻词偏好量大于积极词。研究2考察瘦负面身体自我大学生对瘦相关的身体信息词的加工偏好,发现对瘦相关词的编码速度显著比对照组更快,但对瘦积极词、消极词、隐喻词、形似词编码的偏好量不存在差异。结果支持负面身体自我图式指导认知加工

关键词: 负面身体自我, 加工偏好, 编码, 反应时

Abstract: From the perspective of negative physical self schema theory, highly efficient knowledge structures about body size and shape guide information processing related to the body. Distorted or negative self-schemata contribute to biased information processing about one’s body, resulting in disturbances in body image.
In two experiments, we tested the hypothesis that individuals with specific concerns in self-reported negative physical self concept would display processing biases during a word judgment task. We extended past work by assessing biases for both fat and thin stimuli. Also, the study attempted to reduce possible confounds (i.e., priming effects, nonequivalent control stimuli, mood consistency) identified in past work.
In Experiment 1, groups scoring high (31 females, 4 males) and low (30 females, 5 males) on the Negative Physical Self Scale (NPS) Fatness subscale evaluated a series of fat and non-body words as positive, negative, or neutral. Results indicated that the High Fatness group had faster reaction times (RT) in judging fat words (e.g. positive words and metaphor words) and rated them more negatively than the comparison group did. In contrast, there were no group differences in RT or judgment for non-body words. In Experiment 2, the same methodology was used to assess cognitive biases for thin body words. Groups scoring high (11 females, 20 males) and low (17 males, 14 females) on the NPS Thinness dimension evaluated thinness and non-body words. Although there were no group differences for non-body words, the high Thinness group had a faster mean RT in judging thin words than did the comparison group. Groups did not differ, however, in their evaluations of thin words.
This may be the first study to highlight how information processing biases are found not only among those preoccupied with fatness but also among peers concerned about being too thin. Specifically, emerging adults with preoccupied with either thinness or fatness judge salient body information more quickly than their less preoccupied counterparts do. Howevever, those concerned with fatness have an additional interpretative bias in that they evaluate information about the body more harshly than peers do. Extensions to other sources of body image concern such as physical stature are warranted and future research is needed to clarify the extent to which these biases are risks for and consequences of body image concerns

Key words: negative physical self, cognitive bias, judgment, China, reaction time

中图分类号: