[1] |
Alario F. X., Perre L., Castel C., & Ziegler J. C . (2007). The role of orthography in speech production revisited. Cognition, 102(3), 464-475.
|
[2] |
Chen J.-Y . (2000). Syllable errors from naturalistic slips of the tongue in Mandarin Chinese. Psychologia, 43(1), 15-26.
|
[3] |
Chen J.-Y., Chen T.-M., & Dell G. S . (2002). Word-form encoding in Mandarin Chinese as assessed by the implicit priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(4), 751-781.
|
[4] |
Chen J.-Y., Lin W.-C., & Ferrand L . (2003). Masked priming of the syllable in Mandarin Chinese speech production. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 45, 107-120.
|
[5] |
Chen J.-Y., O'Séaghdha P. G., & Chen T.-M . (2016). The primacy of abstract syllables in Chinese word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(5), 825-836.
|
[6] |
Cholin J., Schiller N. O., & Levelt W. J. M. (2004). The preparation of syllables in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(1), 47-61.
|
[7] |
Damian M. F., & Bowers J. S . (2003). Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 119-132.
|
[8] |
Damian M. F., & Dumay N . (2007). Time pressure and phonological advance planning in spoken production. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(2), 195-209.
|
[9] |
Damian M. F., & Dumay N . (2009). Exploring phonological encoding through repeated segments. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(5), 685-712.
|
[10] |
Damian M. F., & Martin R. C . (1999). Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(2), 345-361.
|
[11] |
Dell G. S . (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283-321.
|
[12] |
Desmedt J. E . (1980). P300 in serial tasks: An essential post-decision closure mechanism. Progessing in Brain Research, 54, 682-686.
|
[13] |
Donchin E., & Coles M. G. H . (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(3), 357-427.
|
[14] |
Forster K. I., & Davis C . (1991). The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task: Interference effects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(1), 1-25.
|
[15] |
Gray J. R., & Burgess G. C . (2004). Personality differences in cognitive control? BAS, processing efficiency, and the prefrontal cortex. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(1), 35-36.
|
[16] |
Hackley S. A., Woldorff M., & Hillyard S. A . (1990). Cross- modal selective attention effects on retinal, myogenic, brainstem, and cerebral evoked potentials. Psychophysiology, 27(2), 195-208.
|
[17] |
Indefrey P . (2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: A critical update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1-16.
|
[18] |
Jacobs C. L., & Dell G. S . (2014). “hotdog”, not “hot” “dog”: The phonological planning of compound words. Language, cognition and neuroscience, 29(4), 512-523.
|
[19] |
Kinoshita S., & Woollams A . (2002). The masked onset priming effect in naming: Computation of phonology or speech planning. Memory and Cognition, 30, 237-245.
|
[20] |
Levelt W. J. M., Roelofs A., & Meyer A.S . (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1-38.
|
[21] |
Luck S. J., & Hillyard S. A . (1994). Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology, 31(3), 291-308.
|
[22] |
Malouf T., & Kinoshita S . (2007). Masked onset priming effect for high-frequency words: Further support for the speech-planning account. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(8), 1155-1167.
|
[23] |
Meyer A. S . (1990). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: The encoding of successive syllables of a word. Journal of Memory & Language, 29(5), 524-545.
|
[24] |
Meyer A. S . (1991). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(1), 69-89.
|
[25] |
Meyer A. S., & Schriefers H . (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 17(6), 1146-1160.
|
[26] |
O’Seaghdha P. G., Chen J.-Y., & Chen T.-M . (2010). Proximate units in word production: Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English. Cognition, 115(2), 282-302.
|
[27] |
O’Seaghdha P. G., Chen J.-Y., & Chen T.-M . (2013). Close but not proximate: The significance of phonological segments in speaking depends on their functional engagement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(1), E3.
|
[28] |
Parker Jones O., Green D. W., Grogan A., Pliatsikas C., Filippopolitis K., Ali N., ... Price C. J . (2012). Where, when and why brain activation differs for bilinguals and monolinguals during picture naming and reading aloud. Cerebral Cortex, 22(4), 892-902.
|
[29] |
Picton T. W . (1992). The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 9(4), 456-479.
|
[30] |
Qu Q. Q., Damian M. F., & Kazanina N . (2012). Sound-sized segments are significant for Mandarin speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(35), 14265-14270.
|
[31] |
Roelofs A . (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64(3), 249-284.
|
[32] |
Roelofs A . (2015). Modeling of phonological encoding in spoken word production: From Germanic languages to Mandarin Chinese and Japanese. Japanese Psychological Research, 57(1), 22-37.
|
[33] |
Schiller N. O . (2008). The masked onset priming effect in picture naming. Cognition, 106(2), 952-962.
|
[34] |
Shattuck-Hufnagel S . (1979). Speech errors as evidence for a serial-ordering mechanism in sentence production. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garret (pp. 295-342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
|
[35] |
Verdonschot R. G., Nakayama M., Zhang Q. F., Tamaoka K., & Schiller N. O . (2013). The proximate phonological unit of Chinese-English bilinguals: Proficiency matters. PloS One, 8(4), e61454.
|
[36] |
Verdonschot R. G., Tokimoto S., & Miyaoka Y . (2019). The fundamental phonological unit of Japanese word production: An EEG study using the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 51, 184-193.
|
[37] |
Verleger R . (1998). Toward an integration of P3 research with cognitive neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(1), 150-152.
|
[38] |
Wang J., Wong A. W.-K., Wang S. P., & Chen H.-C . (2017). Primary phonological planning units in spoken word production are language-specific: Evidence from an ERP study. Scientific Reports, 7, 5815-5822.
|
[39] |
Wang L., Bastiaansen M., Yang Y. F., & Hagoort P . (2011). The influence of information structure on the depth of semantic processing: How focus and pitch accent determine the size of the N400 effect. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 813-820.
|
[40] |
Wong A. W.-K, & Chen H.-C . (2008). Processing segmental and prosodic information in Cantonese word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(5), 1172-1190.
|
[41] |
Wong A. W.-K, & Chen H.-C . (2009). What are effective phonological units in Cantonese spoken word planning? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(5), 888-892.
|
[42] |
Wong A. W.-K., Huang. J, & Chen H.-C . (2012). Phonological units in spoken word production: Insights from Cantonese. PloS One, 7(11), e48776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048776.
|
[43] |
Wong A. W.-K., Ng T.-Y., & Chen H.-C . (2016). Syllabic encoding during overt speech production in Cantonese: Evidence from temporal brain responses. Brain Research, 1648, 101-109.
|
[44] |
You W., Zhang Q., & Verdonschot R. G . (2012). Masked syllable priming effects in word and picture naming in chinese. PLoS ONE, 7(10).
|
[45] |
Yu M., Mo C., & Mo L . (2014). The role of phoneme in Mandarin Chinese production: Evidence from ERPs. PLoS One, 9(9), e106486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106486.
|
[46] |
Yue Y., & Zhang Q. F . (2015). Syllable and segments effects in Mandarin Chinese spoken word production. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(3), 319-328.
|
|
[ 岳源, 张清芳 . (2015). 汉语口语产生中音节和音段的促进和抑制效应. 心理学报, 47(3), 319-328.]
|
[47] |
Zhang Q. F . (2008). Phonological encoding in monosyllabic and bisyllabic Mandarin word production: Implicit priming paradigm study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 40(3), 253-262.
|
|
[ 张清芳 . (2008). 汉语单音节和双音节词汇产生中的音韵编码过程: 内隐启动范式研究. 心理学报, 40(3), 253-262.]
|
[48] |
Zhang Q. F., & Damian M. F . (2019). Syllables constitute proximate units for Mandarin speakers: Electrophysiological evidence from a masked priming task. Psychophysiology, 56(1), e13317. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13317.
|
[49] |
Zhang Q. F., & Yang Y. F . (2005). The phonological planning unit in Chinese monosyllabic word production. Journal of Psychological Science, 28(2), 374-378.
|
|
[ 张清芳, 杨玉芳 . (2005). 汉语单音节词汇产生中音韵编码的单元. 心理科学, 28(2), 374-378.]
|