ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办：中国心理学会
　　　中国科学院心理研究所
出版：科学出版社
2025年4月7日 星期一

心理学报 ›› 1993, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 3-10. cstr: 32110.14.1993.00003

• •    下一篇

时间判断的视听通道效应的实验研究

黄希庭;郑云   

  1. 西南师范大学心理学研究所,西南师范大学心理学研究所 重庆,630715 ,重庆,630715
  • 发布日期:1993-09-25 出版日期:1993-09-25

AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF AUDITORY-VISUAL M0DALITY EFFECT IN TIME JUDGEMENT

Huang Xiting;Zheng Yun Institute of Psychology, Southwest China Normal University, Chongqing   

  • Online:1993-09-25 Published:1993-09-25

摘要： 该实验用视觉或听觉两种方式一次呈现两个时距,随机地指定其中的一个时距要求被试立即再现或延迟5秒再现。实验结果表明:①对短时距信息(1秒,1.5秒,2秒)的判断,听觉比视觉具有明显的优势,听觉的再现时距较精确,延迟对听觉的时间信息检测的破坏作用较小;而对长时距信息(10秒,11秒,12秒)的判断,却未发现听觉比视觉有优势现象。②通道效应的产生机制源于记忆的特点而不是感觉储存的特点。③对短时距的判断通常表现为正时间顺序误差,而对长时距的判断则表现为负时间顺序误差。

关键词: 时间判断, 视听通道效应, 记忆, 时间顺序误差

Abstract: Two intervals were presented at the same time auditorily or visually.Following the presentation, the subject was given randomly one of the twointervals, and was asked to reproduce it immediately orafter a delay of 5sec.The results showed that: (1) In the short time interval condition (1sec.,1.5sec., 2sec.),the reproduction is more accurate for audition rather than vision,and for audition,deley has little effect on temporal information coding. How-ever, in the Iong interval condition (10sec., 11sec., 12sec.), the subject'spreformance was indistinguishable whether the intervals were presented audi-torily or visually. (2) The source of the modality effects is not sensory storedbut memory. (3) Positive time-order-error often occurred in the judgement off-short time interval,negative time-order-error was more likely to occur in longtime interval.

Key words: time judgement, auditory-visual modality\effect, memory, time-order-error