心理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (1): 94-105.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.00094 cstr: 32110.14.2023.00094
收稿日期:
2021-08-23
发布日期:
2022-10-13
出版日期:
2023-01-25
基金资助:
Received:
2021-08-23
Online:
2022-10-13
Published:
2023-01-25
摘要:
动态基频(F0)轮廓有助于嘈杂环境下的言语识别, 可以作为将目标语音从背景声中分离的知觉线索。本研究通过评估老年人与年轻人在言语掩蔽下聆听具有自然动态F0轮廓与对F0轮廓操作调节后的汉语语句的言语识别能力, 探讨老龄化对F0轮廓线索在汉语言语识别去掩蔽作用中的影响。结果显示, 在言语掩蔽下自然动态的F0轮廓比压扁或拉伸的F0轮廓更能帮助年轻人抵抗信息掩蔽识别目标言语; 而老年人在言语掩蔽下却难以从动态F0轮廓线索中受益。研究结果揭示了老年人利用F0轮廓线索促进掩蔽下言语感知能力的老化特点。
中图分类号:
吴梅红. (2023). 老龄化对F0轮廓线索在汉语言语识别去掩蔽作用的影响. 心理学报, 55(1), 94-105.
WU Meihong. (2023). The influence of aging on the unmasking effect of F0 contour cue in Chinese speech recognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 55(1), 94-105.
图3 不同F0轮廓条件下识别率随信噪比变化的函数以及对应的参数方程拟合曲线 注:图中用实线表示年轻人的识别成绩, 平滑的曲线是对数据进行参数拟合的结果。虚线部分显示的是老年人的识别成绩进行参数拟合的结果。图中3种标记分别描述3种不同F0轮廓条件下的识别率:1)扁平的F0轮廓条件(空心圆); 2)自然的F0轮廓条件(实心圆); 3)拉伸的F0轮廓条件(实心三角形)。
[1] |
Arehart K. H. (1994). Effects of harmonic content on complex- tone fundamental-frequency discrimination in hearing- impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95(6), 3574-85.
doi: 10.1121/1.409975 URL |
[2] |
Arehart K. H., Souza P. E., Muralimanohar R. K., & Miller C. W. (2011). Effects of age on concurrent vowel perception in acoustic and simulated electroacoustic hearing. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 54(1), 190-210.
doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0145) URL |
[3] | Assmann P. F., Summerfield Q. (2004). The perception of speech under adverse conditions. In S. Greenberg, W. A. Ainsworth, A. N. Popper, & R. R. Fay (Eds.), Springer Handbook of Auditory Research: Vol. 14: Speech processing in the auditory system (pp. 231-308). New York: Springer. |
[4] |
Baayen R. H., Davidson D. J., & Bates D. M. (2008). Mixed- effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390-412.
doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 URL |
[5] |
Binns C., & Culling J. F. (2007). The role of fundamental frequency contours in the perception of speech against interfering speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(3), 1765-1776.
doi: 10.1121/1.2751394 URL |
[6] | Bologna W. J., Vaden K. I., Ahlstrom J. B., & Dubno J. R. (2019). Age effects on the contributions of envelope and periodicity cues to recognition of interrupted speech in quiet and with a competing talker. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(3), EL173-EL178. |
[7] |
Brown C. A., & Bacon S. P. (2010). Fundamental frequency and speech intelligibility in background noise. Hearing Research, 266(1-2), 52-59.
doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.08.011 pmid: 19748564 |
[8] |
Brungart D. S., Simpson B. D., Ericson M. A., & Scott K. R. (2001). Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(5), 2527-2538.
doi: 10.1121/1.1408946 URL |
[9] |
Chen J., Yang H. Y., Wu X. H., & Moore B. C. J. (2018). The effect of F0 contour on the intelligibility of speech in the presence of interfering sounds for Mandarin Chinese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 143(2), 864-877.
doi: 10.1121/1.5023218 URL |
[10] |
Clinard C. G., & Cotter C. M. (2015). Neural representation of dynamic frequency is degraded in older adults. Hearing Research, 323, 91-98.
doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.02.002 pmid: 25724819 |
[11] |
Clinard C. G., & Tremblay K. L. (2013). Aging degrades the neural encoding of simple and complex sounds in the human brainstem. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 24(7), 590-644.
doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.7.7 pmid: 24047946 |
[12] |
Cutler A., Dahan D., & van Donselaar W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech, 40, 141-201.
doi: 10.1177/002383099704000203 URL |
[13] |
Dannenbring G. L. (1976). Perceived auditory continuity with alternately rising and falling frequency transitions. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 30(2), 99-114.
doi: 10.1037/h0082053 URL |
[14] |
Darwin C. J. (2008). Listening to speech in the presence of other sounds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363(1493), 1011-1021.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2156 URL |
[15] |
Darwin C. J., Brungart D. S., & Simpson B. D. (2003). Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length changes on attention to one of two simultaneous talkers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(5), 2913-2922.
doi: 10.1121/1.1616924 URL |
[16] |
Du Y., Buchsbaum B. R., Grady C. L., & Alain C. (2016). Increased activity in frontal motor cortex compensates impaired speech perception in older adults. Nature Communications, 7, 12241.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms12241 pmid: 27483187 |
[17] |
Frisina D. R., & Frisina R. D. (1997). Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: Relations to possible neural mechanisms. Hearing Research, 106(1-2), 95-104.
pmid: 9112109 |
[18] | Füllgrabe C., Moore B. C., & Stone M. A. (2014). Age- group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 347. |
[19] |
Grant K. W. (1987). Identification of intonation contours by normally hearing and profoundly hearing-impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82(4), 1172-1178.
doi: 10.1121/1.395253 URL |
[20] | Greenberg S., Ainsworth W., Popper A., & Fay R. (2004). Speech processing in the auditory system: Springer Press. |
[21] |
Grose J. H., & Mamo S. K. (2010). Processing of temporal fine structure as a function of age. Ear and Hearing, 31(6), 755-760.
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e627e7 pmid: 20592614 |
[22] |
Helfer K. S., & Freyman R. L. (2008). Aging and speech- on-speech masking. Ear and Hearing, 29(1), 87-98.
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31815d638b pmid: 18091104 |
[23] | Hillenbrand J. M. (2003). Some effects of intonation contour on sentence intelligibility. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(4), 2338. |
[24] |
Hopkins K., & Moore B. (2011). The effects of age and cochlear hearing loss on temporal fine structure sensitivity, frequency selectivity, and speech reception in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(1), 334-349.
doi: 10.1121/1.3585848 URL |
[25] |
Huang Y., Huang Q., Chen X., Qu T. S., Wu X. H., & Li L. (2008). Perceptual integration between target speech and target-speech reflection reduces masking for target-speech recognition in younger adults and older adults. Hearing Research, 244(1-2), 51-65.
doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.07.006 pmid: 18694813 |
[26] |
Humes L. E., Lee J. H., & Coughlin M. P. (2006). Auditory measures of selective and divided attention in young and older adults using single-talker competition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(5), 2926-2937.
doi: 10.1121/1.2354070 URL |
[27] | Jeffreys H. (Ed.). (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. |
[28] |
Kang J. (1998). Comparison of speech intelligibility between english and chinese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103(2), 1213-1216.
doi: 10.1121/1.421253 URL |
[29] |
Lee J. H. (2013). Age-related deficits in the processing of fundamental frequency differences for the intelligibility of competing voices. Korean Journal of Audiology, 17(1), 1-8.
doi: 10.7874/kja.2013.17.1.1 pmid: 24653895 |
[30] |
Li L., Daneman M., Qi J. G., & Schneider B. A. (2004). Does the information content of an irrelevant source differentially affect spoken word recognition in younger and older adults? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(6), 1077-1091.
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.6.1077 URL |
[31] |
Li L., Zheng Y. J., Wu C, Li J. H., Zhang C. X., & Lu L. X. (2017). The brain network mechanisms underlying perceptual unmasking cue-induced improvement of speech recognition under cocktail-party listening conditions. Advances in Psychological Science, 25(12), 2099-2110.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.02099 URL |
[李量, 郑英君, 吴超, 黎绢花, 张畅芯, 陆灵犀. (2017). 在鸡尾酒会场景下利用去掩蔽知觉线索提高言语识别的脑网络机制. 心理科学进展, 25(12), 2099-2110.] | |
[32] |
Miller S. E., Schlauch R. S., & Watson P. J. (2010). The effects of fundamental frequency contour manipulations on speech intelligibility in background noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(1), 435-443.
doi: 10.1121/1.3397384 URL |
[33] | Moore B., & Peters R. W. (1992). Pitch discrimination and phase sensitivity in young and elderly subjects and its relationship to frequency selectivity. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(5), 2881. |
[34] |
Oxenham A. J. (2008). Pitch perception and auditory stream segregation: implications for hearing loss and cochlear implants. Trends in Amplification, 12(4), 316-331.
doi: 10.1177/1084713808325881 pmid: 18974203 |
[35] | Patel A. D., Xu Y., & Wang B. (2010, May). The role of F0 variation in the intelligibility of Mandarin sentences. Paper presented at the International Conference on Speech Prosody, 2010, Chicago, USA. |
[36] |
Pichora-Fuller M. K., Schneider B. A., Macdonald E., Pass H. E., & Brown S. (2007). Temporal jitter disrupts speech intelligibility: A simulation of auditory aging. Hearing Research, 223(1-2), 114-121.
pmid: 17157462 |
[37] |
Rosen S. (1992). Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 336(1278), 367-373.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.1992.0070 URL |
[38] |
Rossi-Katz J., & Arehart K. H. (2009). Message and talker identification in older adults: Effects of task, distinctiveness of the talkers' voices, and meaningfulness of the competing message. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 52(2), 435-453.
doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0243) pmid: 19064902 |
[39] |
Ruggles D., Bharadwaj H., & Shinn-Cunningham B. G. (2011). Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding of suprathreshold features important in everyday communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(37), 15516-15521.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108912108 pmid: 21844339 |
[40] | Schneider B. A., Avivi-Reich M., & Daneman M. (2016). How spoken language comprehension is achieved by older listeners in difficult listening situations. Experimental Aging Research, 42(1), 40-63. |
[41] |
Schneider B. A., Li L., & Daneman M. (2007). How competing speech interferes with speech comprehension in everyday listening situations. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 18(7), 559-572.
pmid: 18236644 |
[42] |
Sheldon S., Pichora-Fuller M. K., & Schneider B. A. (2008). Priming and sentence context support listening to noise- vocoded speech by younger and older adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(1), 489-499.
doi: 10.1121/1.2783762 URL |
[43] |
Shen J., & Souza P. E. (2017). Do older listeners with hearing loss benefit from dynamic pitch for speech recognition in noise?. American Journal of Audiology, 26(3S), 462-466.
doi: 10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0137 pmid: 29049629 |
[44] | Shen J., & Souza P. E. (2019). The ability to glimpse dynamic pitch in noise by younger and older listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 146(3), El232-El237. |
[45] |
Singh G., Pichora-Fuller M. K., & Schneider B. A. (2008). The effect of age on auditory spatial attention in conditions of real and simulated spatial separation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(2), 1294-1305.
doi: 10.1121/1.2949399 URL |
[46] |
Smith Z. M., Delgutte B., & Oxenham A. J. (2002). Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature, 416(6876), 87-90.
doi: 10.1038/416087a URL |
[47] |
Snyder J. S., & Alain C. (2005). Age-related changes in neural activity associated with concurrent vowel segregation. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(3), 492-499.
pmid: 16099361 |
[48] |
Souza P., Arehart K., Miller C. W., & Muralimanohar R. K. (2011). Effects of age on F0 discrimination and intonation perception in simulated electric and electroacoustic hearing. Ear and Hearing, 32(1), 75-83.
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181eccfe9 pmid: 20739892 |
[49] |
Souza P. E., & Boike K. T. (2006). Combining temporal- envelope cues across channels: Effects of age and hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(1), 138-149.
doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/011) URL |
[50] |
Stone M. A., Füllgrabe C., & Moore B. (2008). Benefit of high-rate envelope cues in vocoder processing: Effect of number of channels and spectral region. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(4), 2272-82.
doi: 10.1121/1.2968678 URL |
[51] |
Tun P. A., McCoy S., & Wingfield A. (2009). Aging, hearing acuity, and the attentional costs of effortful listening. Psychology and Aging, 24(3), 761-766.
doi: 10.1037/a0014802 pmid: 19739934 |
[52] |
van Knijff E. C., Coene M., & Govaerts P. J. (2018). Speech understanding in noise in elderly adults: The effect of inhibitory control and syntactic complexity. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 53(3), 628-642.
doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12376 pmid: 29446191 |
[53] |
Vongpaisal T., & Pichora-Fuller M. K. (2007). Effect of age on F0 difference limen and concurrent vowel identification. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(5), 1139-1156.
pmid: 17905901 |
[54] |
Wagenmakers E.-J., Love J., Marsman M., Jamil T., Ly A., Verhagen J.,... Morey R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 58-76.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7 URL |
[55] |
Wang J., Hua S., Zhang L., Liu Z., & Zhang Y. (2013). The roles of fundamental frequency contours and sentence context in mandarin chinese speech intelligibility. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(1), EL91-7.
doi: 10.1121/1.4811159 URL |
[56] |
Wingfield A., & Tun P. A. (2001). Spoken language comprehension in older adults: Interactions between sensory and cognitive change in normal aging. Seminars in Hearing, 22(3), 287-302.
doi: 10.1055/s-2001-15632 URL |
[57] |
Wingfield A., & Tun P. A. (2007). Cognitive supports and cognitive constraints on comprehension of spoken language. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 18(7), 548-558.
pmid: 18236643 |
[58] | Wright H. H. (Ed.). (2016). Cognition, language and aging. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. |
[59] | Wu M. H. (2019). Effect of F0 contour on perception of Mandarin Chinese speech against masking. Plos One, 14(1), e0209976. |
[60] |
Wu M. H., Li H. H., Hong Z. L., Xian X. C., Li J. Y., Wu X. H., & Li L. (2012). Effects of aging on the ability to benefit from prior knowledge of message content in masked speech recognition. Speech Communication, 54(4), 529-542.
doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2011.11.003 URL |
[61] | Xu L., & Zhou N. (2011). Tonal languages and cochlear implants. In: F. G. Zeng, A. N. Popper, & R. R. Fay (Eds.), Auditory prostheses: New horizons (pp. 341-364). Springer; New York. |
[62] |
Yang Z. G., Chen J., Huang Q., Wu X. H., Wu Y. H., Schneider B. A., & Li L. (2007). The effect of voice cuing on releasing Chinese speech from informational masking. Speech Communication, 49(12), 892-904.
doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2007.05.005 URL |
[63] | Zhang Z. P., Wang X., Yu Y. S., & Wu X. H. (2010, November). Hierarchical pitch target model for Mandarin speech. IEEE 2010 7th International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing (pp.378-382). |
[1] | 华山, 姜欣桐, 高扬震宇, 穆妍, 杜忆. 音乐训练与音乐素养对共情能力的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(4): 544-558. |
[2] | 张环, 秦锡权, 刘雨, 林琳, 吴捷. 不同强度趋近动机积极情绪对基于语义关联性错误记忆的影响及其神经机制[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(3): 349-362. |
[3] | 张俐娟, 江妍雪, 马建平, 崔博洋, 张锦坤. 提取难度对困难材料提取练习效应的促进作用:来自行为和fNIRS的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(3): 363-379. |
[4] | 谢晓玲, 潘文谊, 张纯纯, 林静远, 李红. 连续反馈影响主导感的心理与脑电机制[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(3): 380-397. |
[5] | 李春好, 刘荣媛, 刘远豪. 经典和对偶共结果效应对前景集结果区间的依赖性:基于概率权重的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(3): 398-414. |
[6] | 连浩敏, 张倩, 谷雪敏, 李寿欣. 持续性视觉注意对视觉工作记忆项目优先加工的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(2): 191-206. |
[7] | 史滋福, 夏笔奇, 刘欣, 陈火红, 靳紫阳, 彭玲艺. 时间预测中的任务分解效应:未来边界和思维焦点的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(2): 207-217. |
[8] | 郝磊, 许天委, 周文龙, 杨杰, 彭思雅, 刘明兰, 徐家华, 王延培, 谭淑平, 高家红, 贺永, 陶沙, 董奇, 秦绍正. 多种情感与认知任务驱动下大脑可泛化神经表征的发育模式[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(2): 218-231. |
[9] | 孙岩, 王艺锦, 侯沛雨, 冯雪, 兰帆. 抑郁倾向对自我关注重评和情境关注重评影响的脑网络研究[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(2): 232-246. |
[10] | 夏莲香, 刘凯歌, 李新宇, 叶群. 编码方式与叙事连贯性调节情绪对时间顺序记忆的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(1): 1-17. |
[11] | 俞梦霞, 宋宜颖, 刘嘉. 实地导航训练提高大脑功能连接模式稳定性[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(12): 1661-1675. |
[12] | 赵文博, 曹宇琪, 徐木子, 杨春亮, 罗良. 学习判断对虚假记忆的反应性效应[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(12): 1691-1705. |
[13] | 王铖铖, 赵宇飞, 盛缨莹, 赵庆柏, 肖梦施, 韩磊. 数字SNARC效应的发生阶段[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(12): 1706-1717. |
[14] | 李想, 贾丽娜, 魏士琳, 陈俊涛, 夏尧远, 王芹, 金花. 运动特征对抽象动词具身表征的影响:来自fMRI及EMG的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(12): 1718-1733. |
[15] | 梁菲菲, 刘瑛, 贺斐, 冯琳琳, 王峥, 白学军. 中文阅读伴随词汇学习中的视觉复杂性效应:基于笔画数和词长的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(12): 1734-1750. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||