The integration mechanisms of feedforward and feedback control in speech motor system

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00588

Abstract

Abstract:

The final stage in the process of spoken production is articulation, which involves the integration of feedforward and feedback control in speech motor system. Specifically, feedforward control (top-down mechanism) refers to speakers’ ability to retrieve and execute the motor commands responsible for producing target speech sounds, while feedback control (bottom-up mechanism) refers to speakers’ ability to adjust speech movements based on the sensory feedback generated by articulation. Sensory goals and sensory predictions are important hubs linking feedforward and feedback control systems. Based on the neural computational model DIVA (directions into velocities of articulators), the cognitive and neural mechanisms of the integration between feedforward and feedback control are illustrated in the stage of speech acquisition and speech production. On the basis of previous studies, how speakers utilize auditory feedback to control online speech and update feedforward motor representations, and the cognitive significance of the P1-N1-P2 components in the ERP studies are especially discussed. Furthermore, various factors that influence feedforward and feedback control are summarized, including individual variabilities, training experience and task demands. Additionally, some suggestions are proposed for future investigation.

Key words: speech motor system, feedforward control, feedback control, auditory feedback

CLC Number:

B842

CAI Xiao, ZHANG Qingfang. The integration mechanisms of feedforward and feedback control in speech motor system[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(4): 588-603.

Figures/Tables 1

References 107

1	张清芳, 杨玉芳 . ( 2003). 言语产生中的词汇通达理论. 心理科学进展, 11( 1), 6-11.
2	Alsius A., Mitsuya T., & Munhall K . ( 2013). Does compensation in auditory feedback require attention? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 19( 1), 3342.
3	Ballard K. J., Halaki M., Sowman P. F., Kha A., Daliri A., Robin D., .. Guenther F . ( 2018). An investigation of compensation and adaptation to auditory perturbations in individuals with acquired apraxia of speech. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 510.
4	Ballard K. J., Tourville J., & Robin D. A . ( 2014). Behavioral, computational, and neuroimaging studies of acquired apraxia of speech. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 892.
5	Bauer J. J., Mittal J., Larson C. R., & Hain T. C . ( 2006). Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: An automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119( 4), 2363-2371.
6	Behroozmand R., Ibrahim N., Korzyukov O., Robin D. A., & Larson C. R . ( 2015). Functional role of delta and theta band oscillations for auditory feedback processing during vocal pitch motor control. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, 109.
7	Behroozmand, R., & Larson, C . ( 2011). Error-dependent modulation of speech-induced auditory suppression for pitch-shifted voice feedback. BMC Neuroscience, 12( 1), 54-63.
8	Behroozmand R., Sangtian S., Korzyukov O., & Larson C. R . ( 2016). A temporal predictive code for voice motor control: Evidence from ERP and behavioral responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback. Brain Research, 1636, 1-12.
9	Bohland, J. W., & Guenther, F. H . ( 2006). An fMRI investigation of syllable sequence production. NeuroImage, 32( 2), 821-841.
10	Cai, S . ( 2012). Online control of articulation based on auditory feedback in normal speech and stuttering: Behavioral and modeling studies (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
11	Cai S., Beal D. S., Ghosh S. S., Tiede M. K., Guenther F. H., & Perkell J. S . ( 2012). Weak responses to auditory feedback perturbation during articulation in persons who stutter: Evidence for abnormal auditory-motor transformation. PLoS ONE, 7( 7), e41830.
12	Cai S., Ghosh S. S., Guenther F. H., & Perkell J. S . ( 2010). Adaptive auditory feedback control of the production of formant trajectories in the Mandarin triphthong /iau/ and its pattern of generalization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128( 4), 2033-2048.
13	Cai S., Ghosh S. S., Guenther F. H., & Perkell J. S . ( 2011). Focal manipulations of formant trajectories reveal a role of auditory feedback in the online control of both within- syllable and between-syllable speech timing. Journal of Neuroscience, 31( 45), 16483-16490.
14	Cavanagh, J. F., & Frank, M. J . ( 2014). Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18( 8), 414-421.
15	Chang E. F., Niziolek C. A., Knight R. T., Nagarajan S. S., & Houde J. F . ( 2013). Human cortical sensorimotor network underlying feedback control of vocal pitch. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110( 7), 2653-2658.
16	Chen Z., Chen X., Liu P., Huang D., & Liu H . ( 2012). Effect of temporal predictability on the neural processing of self-triggered auditory stimulation during vocalization. BMC Neuroscience, 13( 1), 1-10.
17	Chen Z., Liu P., Jones J. A., Huang D., & Liu H . ( 2010). Sex-related differences in vocal responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(6), EL355-EL360.
18	Chen Z., Liu P., Wang E. Q., Larson C. R., Huang D., & Liu H . ( 2012). ERP correlates of language-specific processing of auditory pitch feedback during self-vocalization. Brain and Language, 121( 1), 25-34.
19	Chen Z., Wong F. C. K., Jones J. A., Li W., Liu P., Chen X., & Liu H . ( 2015). Transfer effect of speech-sound learning on auditory-motor processing of perceived vocal pitch errors. Scientific Reports, 5, 13134.
20	Civier O., Tasko S. M., & Guenther F. H . ( 2010). Overreliance on auditory feedback may lead to sound/syllable repetitions: simulations of stuttering and fluency-inducing conditions with a neural model of speech production. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 35( 3), 246-279.
21	Cowie R., Douglas-Cowie E., & Kerr A. G . ( 1982). A study of speech deterioration in post-lingually deafened adults. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 96( 2), 101-112.
22	Cruikshank L. C., Singhal A., Hueppelsheuser M., & Caplan J. B . ( 2012). Theta oscillations reflect a putative neural mechanism for human sensorimotor integration. Journal of Neurophysiology, 107( 1), 65-77.
23	Daliri, A., & Max, L . ( 2015a). Electrophysiological evidence for a general auditory prediction deficit in adults who stutter. Brain and Language, 150, 37-44.
24	Daliri, A., & Max, L . ( 2015b). Modulation of auditory processing during speech movement planning is limited in adults who stutter. Brain and Language, 143, 59-68.
25	Daliri A., Wieland E. A., Cai S., Guenther F. H., & Chang S.-E . ( 2017). Auditory-motor adaptation is reduced in adults who stutter but not in children who stutter. Developmental Science, 21( 2), e12521.
26	Delvaux, V., & Soquet, A . ( 2007). The influence of ambient speech on adult speech productions through unintentional imitation. Phonetica, 64( 2-3), 145-173.
27	Franken M. K., Acheson D. J., Mcqueen J. M., Peter H., & Frank E . ( 2018). Opposing and following responses in sensorimotor speech control: Why responses go both ways. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25( 4), 1458-1467.
28	Franken M. K., Frank E., Acheson D. J., Mcqueen J. M., Peter H., & Jan-Mathijs S . ( 2018). Self-monitoring in the cerebral cortex: Neural responses to small pitch shifts in auditory feedback during speech production. NeuroImage, 179, 326-336.
29	Franklin, D. W., & Wolpert, D. M . ( 2011). Computational mechanisms of sensorimotor control. Neuron, 72( 3), 425-442.
30	Fu C. H., Vythelingum G. N., Brammer M. J., Williams S. C., Amaro E., Jr., Andrew C. M., … McGuire K. P . ( 2006). An fMRI study of verbal self-monitoring: Neural correlates of auditory verbal feedback. Cerebral Cortex, 16( 7), 969-977.
31	Golfinopoulos E., Tourville J. A., Bohland J. W., Ghosh S. S., Nieto-Castanon A., & Guenther F. H . ( 2011). fMRI investigation of unexpected somatosensory feedback perturbation during speech. NeuroImage, 55( 3), 1324-1338.
32	Golfinopoulos E., Tourville J. A., & Guenther F. H . ( 2010). The integration of large-scale neural network modeling and functional brain imaging in speech motor control. NeuroImage, 52( 3), 862-874.
33	Gould J., Lane H., Vick J., Perkell J. S., Matthies M. L., & Zandipour M . ( 2001). Changes in speech intelligibility of postlingually deaf adults after cochlear implantation. Ear and Hearing, 22( 6), 453-460.
34	Grafton S. T., Schmitt P., van Horn J., & Diedrichsen J . ( 2008). Neural substrates of visuomotor learning based on improved feedback control and prediction. NeuroImage, 39( 3), 1383-1395.
35	Guenther, F. H . ( 1994). A neural network model of speech acquisition and motor equivalent speech production. Biological Cybernetics, 72( 1), 43-53.
36	Guenther, F. H . ( 1995). Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production. Psychological Review, 102( 3), 594-621.
37	Guenther, F . ( 2006). Cortical interactions underlying the production of speech sounds. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39( 5), 350-365.
38	Guenther F. H. ( 2006). Neural control of speech . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39	Guenther F. H., Ghosh S. S., & Tourville J. A . ( 2006). Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain and Language, 96( 3), 280-301.
40	Guenther, F., & Vladusich, T . ( 2012). A neural theory of speech acquisition and production. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 25( 5), 408-422.
41	Heinks‐Maldonado T. H., Mathalon D. H., Gray M., & Ford J. M . ( 2005). Fine‐tuning of auditory cortex during speech production. Psychophysiology, 42( 2), 180-190.
42	Heinks-Maldonado T. H., Nagarajan S. S., & Houde J. F . ( 2006). Magnetoencephalographic evidence for a precise forward model in speech production. Neuroreport, 17( 13), 1375-1379.
43	Hickok, G . ( 2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13( 2), 135-145.
44	Hickok G., Houde J., & Rong F . ( 2011). Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: Computational basis and neural organization. Neuron, 69( 3), 407-422.
45	Hickok G., Okada K., & Serences J. T . ( 2009). Area Spt in the human planum temporale supports sensory-motor integration for speech processing. Journal of Neurophysiology, 101( 5), 2725-2732.
46	Houde, J. F., & Chang, E. F . ( 2015). The cortical computations underlying feedback control in vocal production. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 33, 174-181.
47	Houde, J. F., & Nagarajan, S. S . ( 2011). Speech production as state feedback control. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 82.
48	Houde J. F., Nagarajan S. S., Sekihara K., & Merzenich M. M . ( 2002). Modulation of the auditory cortex during speech: An MEG study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14( 8), 1125-1138.
49	Indefrey, P . ( 2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: A critical update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 255.
50	Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M . ( 2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92( 1-2), 101-144.
51	Ito, M . ( 2000). Mechanisms of motor learning in the cerebellum. Brain Research, 886( 1-2), 237-245.
52	Iuzzini-Seigel J., Hogan T. P., Guarino A. J., & Green J. R . ( 2015). Reliance on auditory feedback in children with childhood apraxia of speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 54, 32-42.
53	Jones, J. A., & Keough, D . ( 2008). Auditory-motor mapping for pitch control in singers and nonsingers. Experimental Brain Research, 190( 3), 279-287.
54	Jones J. A., Scheerer N., & Tumber A . ( 2013). The relationship between vocal pitch feedback error and event-related brain potentials. In Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, Vol. 19, 060151.
55	Kakimoto A., Ito S., Okada H., Nishizawa S., Minoshima S., & Ouchi Y . ( 2016). Age-related sex-specific changes in brain metabolism and morphology. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 57( 2), 221-225.
56	Kalpouzos G., Nyberg L., . ( 2010). Asymmetry of memory in the brain. In K. Hugdahl, R. Westerhausen, (Eds). The two halves of the brain: Information processing in the cerebral hemispheres. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. 499-530.
57	Kearney, E., & Guenther, F. H . ( 2019). Articulating: The neural mechanisms of speech production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34( 9), 1-16.
58	Kearney E., Nieto-Castoñón A., Weerathunge H. R., Falsini R., Daliri A., Abur D., .. Guenther F. H . ( 2020). A simple 3-parameter model for examining adaptation in speech and voice production. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2995.
59	Keough D., Hawco C., & Jones J. A . ( 2013). Auditory-motor adaptation to frequency-altered auditory feedback occurs when participants ignore feedback. BMC Neuroscience, 14( 1), 25-35.
60	Kort N. S., Nagarajan S. S., & Houde J. F . ( 2014). A bilateral cortical network responds to pitch perturbations in speech feedback. NeuroImage, 86, 525-535.
61	Korzyukov O., Karvelis L., Behroozmand R., & Larson C. R . ( 2012). ERP correlates of auditory processing during automatic correction of unexpected perturbations in voice auditory feedback. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83( 1), 71-78.
62	Korzyukov O., Sattler L., Behroozmand R., & Larson C. R . ( 2012). Neuronal mechanisms of voice control are affected by implicit expectancy of externally triggered perturbations in auditory feedback. PLoS One, 7( 7), e41216.
63	Lametti D. R., Krol S. A., Shiller D. M., & Ostry D. J . ( 2014). Brief periods of auditory perceptual training can determine the sensory targets of speech motor learning. Psychological Science, 25( 7), 1325-1336.
64	Lametti D. R., Nasir S. M., & Ostry D. J . ( 2012). Sensory preference in speech production revealed by simultaneous alteration of auditory and somatosensory feedback. Journal of Neuroscience, 32( 27), 9351-9358.
65	Lane, H., & Webster, J. W . ( 1991). Speech deterioration in postlingually deafened adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89( 2), 859-866.
66	Levelt W. J. M., Roelofs A., & Meyer A. S . ( 1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22( 1), 1-75.
67	Li J., Hu H., Chen N., Jones J. A., Wu D., Liu P., & Liu H . ( 2018). Aging and sex influence cortical auditory-motor integration for speech control. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, 749.
68	Liu H., Meshman M., Behroozmand R., & Larson C. R . ( 2011). Differential effects of perturbation direction and magnitude on the neural processing of voice pitch feedback. Clinical Neurophysiology, 122( 5), 951-957.
69	Liu H., Russo N., & Larson C. R . ( 2010). Age-related differences in vocal responses to pitch feedback perturbations: A preliminary study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127( 2), 1042-1046.
70	Liu H., Wang E. Q., Chen Z., Liu P., Larson C. R., & Huang D . ( 2010). Effect of tonal native language on voice fundamental frequency responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalizations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128( 6), 3739-3746.
71	Liu, X., & Tian, X . ( 2018). The functional relations among motor-based prediction, sensory goals and feedback in learning non-native speech sounds: Evidence from adult Mandarin Chinese speakers with an auditory feedback masking paradigm. Scientific Reports, 8( 1), 11910.
72	Liu Y., Hu H., Jones J., Guo Z., Li W., Chen X., … Liu H . ( 2015). Selective and divided attention modulates auditory-vocal integration in the processing of pitch feedback errors. European Journal of Neuroscience, 42( 3), 1895-1904.
73	Maas E., Mailend M. L., & Guenther F. H . ( 2015). Feedforward and feedback control in apraxia of speech: Effects of noise masking on vowel production. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58( 2), 185-200.
74	Mitsuya T., Munhall K. G., & Purcell D. W . ( 2017). Modulation of auditory-motor learning in response to formant perturbation as a function of delayed auditory feedback. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141( 4), 2758-2767.
75	Munhall K. G., Macdonald E. N., Byrne S. K., & Johnsrude I . ( 2009). Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not to compensate. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125( 1), 384-390.
76	New A. B., Robin D. A., Parkinson A. L., Duffy J. R., McNeil M. R., Piguet O., … Ballard K . ( 2015). Altered resting-state network connectivity in stroke patients with and without apraxia of speech. NeuroImage: Clinical, 8, 429-439.
77	Ning L.-H., Loucks T. M., & Shih C . ( 2015). The effects of language learning and vocal training on sensorimotor control of lexical tone. Journal of Phonetics, 51, 50-69.
78	Ning L.-H., Shih C., & Loucks T. M . ( 2014). Mandarin tone learning in L2 adults: A test of perceptual and sensorimotor contributions. Speech Communication, 63-64, 55-69.
79	Niziolek C. A., Nagarajan S. S., & Houde J. F . ( 2013). What does motor efference copy represent? Evidence from speech production. Journal of Neuroscience, 33( 41), 16110-16116.
80	Oller, D. K., & Eilers, R. E . ( 1988). The role of audition in infant babbling. Child Development, 59( 2), 441-449.
81	O’Reilly J. X., Mesulam M. M., & Nobre A. C . ( 2008). The cerebellum predicts the timing of perceptual events. Journal of Neuroscience, 28( 9), 2252-2260.
82	Parkinson A. L., Flagmeier S. G., Manes J. L., Larson C. R., Rogers B., & Robin D. A . ( 2012). Understanding the neural mechanisms involved in sensory control of voice production. NeuroImage, 61( 1), 314-322.
83	Parrell B., Agnew Z., Nagarajan S., Houde J., & Ivry R. B . ( 2017). Impaired feedforward control and enhanced feedback control of speech in patients with cerebellar degeneration. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37( 38), 9249-9258.
84	Parrell B., Lammert A. C., Ciccarelli G., & Quatieri T. F . ( 2019). Current models of speech motor control: A control-theoretic overview of architectures and properties. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145( 3), 1456-1481.
85	Patel R., Reilly K. J., Archibald E., Cai S., & Guenther F. H . ( 2015). Responses to intensity-shifted auditory feedback during running speech. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 58( 6), 1687-1694.
86	Perkell, J. S . ( 2012). Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 25( 5), 382-407.
87	Reilly, K. J., & Pettibone, C . ( 2017). Vowel generalization and its relation to adaptation during perturbations of auditory feedback. Journal of Neurophysiology, 118( 5), 2925-2934.
88	Saltzman, E., & Munhall, K . ( 1989). A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecological Psychology, 1( 4), 333-382.
89	Scheerer N. E., Behich J., Liu H., & Jones J. A . ( 2013). ERP correlates of the magnitude of pitch errors detected in the human voice. Neuroscience, 240, 176-185.
90	Scheerer, N. E., & Jones, J. A . ( 2012). The relationship between vocal accuracy and variability to the level of compensation to altered auditory feedback. Neuroscience Letters, 529( 2), 128-132.
91	Scheerer, N. E., & Jones, J. A . ( 2014). The predictability of frequency-altered auditory feedback changes the weighting of feedback and feedforward input for speech motor control. European Journal of Neuroscience, 40( 12), 3793-3806.
92	Scheerer, N. E., & Jones, J. A . ( 2018). Detecting our own vocal errors: An event-related study of the thresholds for perceiving and compensating for vocal pitch errors. Neuropsychologia, 114, 158-167.
93	Scheerer N. E., Liu H., & Jones J. A . ( 2013). The developmental trajectory of vocal and event-related potential responses to frequency-altered auditory feedback. European Journal of Neuroscience, 38( 8), 3189-3200.
94	Simmonds A. J., Wise R. J., & Leech R . ( 2011). Two tongues, one brain: Imaging bilingual speech production. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 166.
95	Swink, S., & Stuart, A . ( 2012). The effect of gender on the N1-P2 auditory complex while listening and speaking with altered auditory feedback. Brain and Language, 122( 1), 25-33.
96	Terband H., Rodd J., & Maas E . ( 2015). Simulations of feedforward and feedback control in apraxia of speech (AOS): Effects of noise masking on vowel production in the DIVA model. In The 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2015). Glasgow, UK.
97	Tian, X., & Poeppel, D . ( 2010). Mental imagery of speech and movement implicates the dynamics of internal forward models. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 166.
98	Tian, X., & Poeppel, D . ( 2012). Mental imagery of speech: Linking motor and perceptual systems through internal simulation and estimation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 314.
99	Tian, X., & Poeppel, D . ( 2015). Dynamics of self-monitoring and error detection in speech production: Evidence from mental imagery and MEG. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27( 2), 352-364.
100	Tian X., Zarate J. M., & Poeppel D . ( 2016). Mental imagery of speech implicates two mechanisms of perceptual reactivation. Cortex, 77( 7), 1-12.
101	Tourville, J. A., & Guenther, F. H . ( 2011). The DIVA model: A neural theory of speech acquisition and production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26( 7), 952-981.
102	Tourville J. A., Reilly K. J., & Guenther F. H . ( 2008). Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech. NeuroImage, 39( 3), 1429-1443.
103	Toyomura A., Koyama S., Miyamaoto T., Terao A., Omori T., Murohashi H., & Kurikl S . ( 2007). Neural correlates of auditory feedback control in human. Neuroscience, 146( 2), 499-503.
104	Tumber A. K., Scheerer N. E., & Jones J. A . ( 2014). Attentional demands influence vocal compensations to pitch errors heard in auditory feedback. PLoS ONE, 9( 10), e109968.
105	Tye-Murray, N, & Spencer, L . ( 1995). Acquisition of speech by children who have prolonged cochlear implant experience. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38( 2), 327-337.
106	Wolpert D. M., Diedrichsen J., & Flanagan J. R . ( 2011). Principles of sensorimotor learning. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12( 12), 739-751.
107	Zheng Z. Z., Munhall K. G., & Johnsrude I. S . ( 2010). Functional overlap between regions involved in speech perception and in monitoring oneʼs own voice during speech production. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22( 8), 1770-1781.

[1]	YE Shuqi, YIN Junting, LI Zhaoxian, LUO Junlong. The influence mechanism of emotion on intuitive and analytical processing [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 736-746.
[2]	LI Yadan, DU Ying, XIE Cong, LIU Chunyu, YANG Yilong, LI Yangping, QIU Jiang. A meta-analysis of the relationship between semantic distance and creative thinking [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 519-534.
[3]	YU Jie, CHEN Youguo. Spatiotemporal interference effect: An explanation based on Bayesian models [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 597-607.
[4]	WANG Yongli, GE Shengnan, Lancy Lantin Huang, WAN Qin, LU Haidan. Neural mechanism of speech imagery [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 608-621.
[5]	YANG Qing, LI Yaqin. Is uncertainty bad? Mixed findings and explanatory model of error processing under uncertainty [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(3): 338-349.
[6]	WANG Xudong, HE Yaji, FAN Huiyong, LUO Yangmei, CHEN Xuhai. The advantages and disadvantages of interpersonal anger: Evidence from meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(3): 386-401.
[7]	LI Qingyang, YIN Junting, LUO Junlong. Legs move, thoughts flow: Physical exercise influences creative thinking [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(3): 455-466.
[8]	CHEN Zi-Wei, FU Di, LIU Xun. Better to misidentify than to miss: A review of occurrence mechanisms and applications of face pareidolia [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(2): 240-255.
[9]	WANG Songxue, CHENG Si, JIANG Ting, LIU Xun, ZHANG Mingxia. The effect of external rewards on declarative memory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(1): 78-86.
[10]	XIE Caifeng, WU Jiahua, XU Liying, YU Feng, ZHAND Yuyan, XIE Yingying. The process motivation model of algorithmic decision-making approach and avoidance [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(1): 60-77.
[11]	YE Weihao, YU Meiqi, ZHANG Lihui, GAO Qi, FU Mingzhu, LU Jiamei. Negative emotion granularity: Its mechanisms and related interventions [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 0, (): 0-0.
[12]	ZHU Chuanlin, LIU Dianzhi, LUO Wenbo. The cognitive and brain mechanisms of how emotional experience affecting individuals’ utilization of estimation strategies [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(12): 2639-2649.
[13]	SHI Hanwen, LI Yutong, SUI Xue. Effects of emotional word types: behavioral and neural evidence for discrimination between emotion-label and emotion-laden words [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(12): 2696-2707.
[14]	CHEN Yutian, CHEN Rui, LI Peng. The development of concept and theoretical models of “chunking” in working memory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(12): 2708-2717.
[15]	SHI Huiying, TANG Jie, LIU Pingping. Instability of the watching eyes effect and perceived norms: A new perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(12): 2718-2734.