Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8): 1411-1428.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.01411
• Conceptual Framework • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-11-10
Online:
2023-08-15
Published:
2023-05-12
CLC Number:
GAO Zhonghua, XU Yan. Mentoring in intelligent manufacturing and its impacts on team dual innovation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(8): 1411-1428.
区别 | 传统师徒关系 | 智能制造师徒关系 |
---|---|---|
参与对象 | 师傅、徒弟 | 师傅、徒弟、智能平台 |
传授形式 | 面对面接受师傅的言传身教 师传徒的单向传承 师傅和徒弟身份相对单一 | 通过智能平台向师傅主动学习 师徒多方学习网络 师傅和徒弟身份自由切换 |
关系特征 | 被动性 二元性 单线性 | 主动性 网络性 动态性 |
区别 | 传统师徒关系 | 智能制造师徒关系 |
---|---|---|
参与对象 | 师傅、徒弟 | 师傅、徒弟、智能平台 |
传授形式 | 面对面接受师傅的言传身教 师传徒的单向传承 师傅和徒弟身份相对单一 | 通过智能平台向师傅主动学习 师徒多方学习网络 师傅和徒弟身份自由切换 |
关系特征 | 被动性 二元性 单线性 | 主动性 网络性 动态性 |
[1] | 边燕杰, 丘海雄. (2000, 2月). 企业的社会资本及其功效. 中国社会科学, 2, 87-99. |
[2] |
陈诚, 文鹏, 舒晓兵. (2015). 多水平导师指导行为对员工结果的影响机制. 心理科学进展, 23(4), 554-561.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.00554 |
[3] | 陈驰茵, 唐宁玉. (2017, 12月). 团队过程研究十年回顾: 2008至2017. 中国人力资源开发, 12, 47-59. |
[4] | 陈金亮, 赵雅欣, 林嵩. (2021). 智能制造能促进企业创新绩效吗? 外国经济与管理, 43(9), 83-101. |
[5] | 陈璐, 柏帅皎, 王月梅. (2016). CEO变革型领导与高管团队创造力: 一个被调节的中介模型. 南开管理评论, 19(2), 63-74. |
[6] | 杜鹏程, 李敏, 倪清, 吴婷. (2015). 差错反感文化对员工创新行为的影响机制研究. 管理学报, 12(4), 538-545. |
[7] | 高中华, 赵晨, 付悦, 刘永虹. (2020). 团队情境下忧患型领导对角色绩效的多层链式影响机制研究. 管理世界, 36(9), 186-201+216+202. |
[8] | 韩翼, 杨百寅. (2012, 6月). 师徒关系开启徒弟职业成功之门: 政治技能视角. 管理世界, 6, 124-132. |
[9] | 韩翼, 周洁, 孙习习, 杨百寅. (2013). 师徒关系结构、作用机制及其效应. 管理评论, 25(7), 54-66. |
[10] |
何贵兵, 陈诚, 何泽桐, 崔力丹, 陆嘉琦, 宣泓舟, 林琳. (2022). 智能组织中的人机协同决策: 基于人机内部兼容性的研究探索. 心理科学进展, 30(12), 2619-2627.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.02619 |
[11] | 何勤, 董晓雨, 朱晓妹. (2022). 人工智能引发劳动关系变革: 系统重构与治理框架. 中国人力资源开发, 39(1), 134-148. |
[12] | 晋琳琳, 陈宇, 奚菁. (2016). 家长式领导对科研团队创新绩效影响: 一项跨层次研究. 科研管理, 37(7), 107-116. |
[13] | 李进生, 曾颢, 赵曙明. (2021). 师徒制对徒弟创新绩效的影响机制研究: 心理可得性和主动性人格的作用. 商业经济与管理, (3), 19-29. |
[14] | 刘宁, 贾俊生. (2012, 6月). 研发团队多元性、知识分享与创新绩效关系的实证研究. 南开管理评论, 6, 85-92, 103. |
[15] | 刘智强, 卫利华, 周空, 廖书迪. (2019). 地位冲突的“双面”特性与团队创新. 南开管理评论, 22(4), 176-186. |
[16] | 罗文豪, 霍伟伟, 赵宜萱, 王震. (2022). 人工智能驱动的组织与人力资源管理变革: 实践洞察与研究方向. 中国人力资源开发, 39(1), 4-16. |
[17] |
罗文豪, 王尧. (2022). 成为自己的掌舵者: 个体自我领导的多层次驱动机制. 心理科学进展, 30(10), 2177-2193.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.02177 |
[18] | 吕鸿江, 张秋萍, 彭丽娟. (2020, 11月). 领导被下属“逆向指导”的权变机制——信息深加工和信任地位的作用. 中国工业经济, 11, 174-192. |
[19] | 宋萌, 王震, 张华磊. (2017). 领导跨界行为影响团队创新的内在机制和边界条件: 知识管理的视角. 管理评论, 29(3), 126-135. |
[20] | 孙继伟, 李晓琳. (2018). 技术型企业过往绩效对团队创新行为的影响: 关系冲突的中介效应. 科技进步与对策, 35(5), 88-95. |
[21] | 孙玺, 李南, 付信夺. (2013). 企业师徒制知识共享与转移的有效性评价. 情报理论与实践, 36(7), 76-80. |
[22] | 王凯, 韩翼. (2018). 企业师徒关系对徒弟工作活力与创新绩效的影响. 科技进步与对策, 35(5), 147-153. |
[23] | 卫武, 赵鹤. (2018). 团队时间领导与团队创新行为: 基于团队从工作中的心理解脱视角. 南开管理评论, 21(4), 39-49. |
[24] | 魏翔宇, 于广涛. (2021). 企业导师指导如何激发徒弟创新——基于认知和情感的双路径机制研究. 经济管理, 43(2), 123-138. |
[25] |
徐禕, 刘艺璇. (2021). 技术信任和领导信任对企业员工新技术接受的影响. 心理科学进展, 29(10), 1711-1723.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.01711 |
[26] | 姚柱, 罗瑾琏, 张显春, 熊正德. (2020). 研发团队时间压力、团队反思与创新绩效. 科学学研究, 38(8), 1526-1536. |
[27] | 叶龙, 刘园园, 郭名. (2020). 传承的意义:企业师徒关系对徒弟工匠精神的影响研究. 外国经济与管理, 42(7), 95-107. |
[28] | 袁庆宏, 张华磊, 王震, 黄勇. (2015). 研发团队跨界活动对团队创新绩效的“双刃剑”效应——团队反思的中介作用和授权领导的调节作用. 南开管理评论, 18(3), 13-23. |
[29] | 曾德麟, 蔡家玮, 欧阳桃花. (2021). 数字化转型研究: 整合框架与未来展望. 外国经济与管理, 43(5), 63-76. |
[30] | 曾颢, 赵曙明. (2017, 4月). 工匠精神的企业行为与省际实践. 改革, 4, 125-136. |
[31] | 张敏, 赵宜萱. (2022). 机器学习在人力资源管理领域中的应用研究. 中国人力资源开发, 39(1), 71-83. |
[32] | 张明超, 孙新波, 钱雨. (2021). 数据赋能驱动智能制造企业C2M反向定制模式创新实现机理. 管理学报, 18(8), 1175-1186. |
[33] | 张远, 李焕杰. (2022, 1月). 企业智能化转型对内部劳动力结构转换的影响研究. 中国人力资源开发, 1, 98-118. |
[34] | 张云运, 张其文, 张李斌, 任萍, 秦幸娜, 常睿生. (2022). 青少年友谊网络与受欺凌的共同变化关系: 一项纵向社会网络分析研究. 心理学报, 54(9), 1050-1060. |
[35] | 赵晨, 周锦来, 高中华. (2021). 社会化互动视角下新员工嵌入团队交互记忆系统的动态机制. 河南师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 48(6), 100-107. |
[36] |
Alsharo, M., Gregg, D., & Ramirez, R. (2017). Virtual team effectiveness: The role of knowledge sharing and trust. Information & Management, 54(4), 479-490.
doi: 10.1016/j.im.2016.10.005 URL |
[37] |
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
doi: 10.2307/256995 URL |
[38] |
Argote, L., & Miron-Spektor, E. (2011). Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organization Science, 22(5), 1123-1137.
doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0621 URL |
[39] |
Austin, J. R. (2003). Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 866-878.
pmid: 14516250 |
[40] |
Bang, H., & Reio, T. G.,Jr. (2017). Personal accomplishment, mentoring, and creative self-efficacy as predictors of creative work involvement: The moderating role of positive and negative affect. The Journal of Psychology, 151(2), 148-170.
doi: 10.1080/00223980.2016.1248808 URL |
[41] |
Barczak, G., Lassk, F., & Mulki, J. (2010). Antecedents of team creativity: An examination of team emotional intelligence, team trust and collaborative culture. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(4), 332-345.
doi: 10.1111/caim.2010.19.issue-4 URL |
[42] |
Belso-Martinez, J. A., & Diez-Vial, I. (2018). Firm's strategic choices and network knowledge dynamics: How do they affect innovation? Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(1), 1-20.
doi: 10.1108/JKM-12-2016-0524 URL |
[43] |
Bowers, C., Kreutzer, C., Cannon-Bowers, J., & Lamb, J. (2017). Team resilience as a second-order emergent state: A theoretical model and research directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1360. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01360
doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01360 |
[44] |
Brennecke, J., & Rank, O. N. (2016). The interplay between formal project memberships and informal advice seeking in knowledge-intensive firms: A multilevel network approach. Social Networks, 44, 307-318.
doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2015.02.004 URL |
[45] |
Brock, J. K. U., & von Wangenheim, F. (2019). Demystifying AI: What digital transformation leaders can teach you about realistic artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 110-134.
doi: 10.1177/1536504219865226 URL |
[46] |
Büchi, G., Cugno, M., & Castagnoli, R. (2020). Smart factory performance and industry 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119790-119800.
doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119790 URL |
[47] |
Chao, G. T., Walz, P., & Gardner, P. D. (1992). Formal and informal mentorships: A comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with nonmentored counterparts. Personnel Psychology, 45(3), 619-636.
doi: 10.1111/peps.1992.45.issue-3 URL |
[48] |
Chen, A. S. Y., & Hou, Y. H. (2016). The effects of ethical leadership, voice behavior and climates for innovation on creativity: A moderated mediation examination. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 1-13.
doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.007 URL |
[49] |
Chou, L. F., Cheng, B. S., Huang, M. P., & Cheng, H. Y. (2006). Guanxi networks and members’ effectiveness in Chinese work teams: Mediating effects of trust networks. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9(2), 79-95.
doi: 10.1111/ajsp.2006.9.issue-2 URL |
[50] |
Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544-560.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2006.21794671 URL |
[51] |
Crnjac, M., Vea, I., & Banduka, N. (2017). From concept to the introduction of industry 4.0. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 8(1), 21-30.
doi: 10.24867/IJIEM URL |
[52] |
Curtis, M. B., & Taylor, E. Z. (2018). Developmental mentoring, affective organizational commitment, and knowledge sharing in public accounting firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(1), 142-161.
doi: 10.1108/JKM-03-2017-0097 URL |
[53] |
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Tan, H. H. (2000). The trusted general manager and business unit performance: Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 563-576.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266 URL |
[54] |
de Jong, B. A., & Elfring, T. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 535-549.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.51468649 URL |
[55] |
Demir, M., McNeese, N. J., & Cooke, N. J. (2020). Understanding human-robot teams in light of all-human teams: Aspects of team interaction and shared cognition. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 140, 102436-102463.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102436 URL |
[56] |
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
doi: 10.2307/2666999 URL |
[57] |
Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. (2001). Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 685-716.
doi: 10.2307/3094828 URL |
[58] |
Ensher, E. A., Heun, C., & Blanchard, A. (2003). Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: New directions in research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(2), 264-288.
doi: 10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00044-7 URL |
[59] | Ensher, E. A., & Murphy, S. E. (2007). E-mentoring. In B. R. Ragins & K. E. Kram (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 299-322). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. |
[60] | Freeman, L. (2004). The development of social network analysis. A Study in the Sociology of Science, 1(687), 159-167. |
[61] |
Fuller, M. A., Hardin, A. M., & Davison, R. M. (2006). Efficacy in technology-mediated distributed teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 209-235.
doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222230308 URL |
[62] |
Germain, M. L., & McGuire, D. (2014). The role of swift trust in virtual teams and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(3), 356-370.
doi: 10.1177/1523422314532097 URL |
[63] |
Gibbons, D. E. (2004). Network structure and innovation ambiguity effects on diffusion in dynamic organizational fields. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 938-951.
doi: 10.2307/20159633 URL |
[64] | Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 269-313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. |
[65] |
Hameed, W. U., Nisar, Q. A., & Wu, H. C. (2021). Relationships between external knowledge, internal innovation, firms' open innovation performance, service innovation and business performance in the Pakistani hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 92, Article 102745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102745
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102745 |
[66] | Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., & Schaefer, K. E. (2011). Can you trust your robot? Ergonomics in Design, 19(3), 24-29. |
[67] |
Healey, M. P., Vuori, T., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2015). When teams agree while disagreeing: Reflexion and reflection in shared cognition. Academy of Management Review, 40(3), 399-422.
doi: 10.5465/amr.2013.0154 URL |
[68] |
Hong, P., Doll, W. J., Nahm, A. Y., & Li, X. (2004). Knowledge sharing in integrated product development. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(2), 102-112.
doi: 10.1108/14601060410534393 URL |
[69] |
Hu, C., Baranik, L. E., Cheng, Y. N., Huang, J. C., & Yang, C. C. (2020). Mentoring support and protégé creativity: Examining the moderating roles of job dissatisfaction and Chinese traditionality. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 58(3), 335-355.
doi: 10.1111/aphr.v58.3 URL |
[70] |
Hu, J., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Leader-team complementarity: Exploring the interactive effects of leader personality traits and team power distance values on team processes and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(6), 935-955.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000203 pmid: 28277722 |
[71] |
Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128-1145.
doi: 10.1037/a0015978 pmid: 19702361 |
[72] |
Hunt, D. M., & Michael, C. (1983). Mentorship: A career training and development tool. Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 475-485.
doi: 10.2307/257836 URL |
[73] |
Jin, Y., & Shao, Y. F. (2022). Power-leveraging paradox and firm innovation: The influence of network power, knowledge integration and breakthrough innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 102, 205-215.
doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.01.007 URL |
[74] | Jordan, J., & Sorell, M. (2019, October). Why reverse mentoring works and how to do it right. Harvard Business Review. |
[75] |
Kram, K. E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 608-625.
doi: 10.2307/255910 URL |
[76] |
Lee, H. W., Choi, J. N., & Kim, S. (2018). Does gender diversity help teams constructively manage status conflict? An evolutionary perspective of status conflict, team psychological safety, and team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 144, 187-199.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.09.005 URL |
[77] |
LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Jackson, C. L., Mathieu, J. E., & Saul, J. R. (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 273-307.
doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x URL |
[78] |
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967-985.
doi: 10.2307/2578601 URL |
[79] |
Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 587-604.
pmid: 12940401 |
[80] |
Lewis, K., & Herndon, B. (2011). Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1254-1265.
doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0647 URL |
[81] | Li, B. H., Hou, B. C., Yu, W. T., Lu, X. B., & Yang, C. W. (2017). Applications of artificial intelligence in intelligent manufacturing: A review. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 18(1), 86-96. |
[82] |
Liu, S., Hu, J., Li, Y., Wang, Z., & Lin, X. (2014). Examining the cross-level relationship between shared leadership and learning in teams: Evidence from China. Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 282-295.
doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.08.006 URL |
[83] |
Lu, J. G., Hafenbrack, A. C., Eastwick, P. W., Wang, D. J., Maddux, W. W., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017). “Going out” of the box: Close intercultural friendships and romantic relationships spark creativity, workplace innovation, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(7), 1091-1108.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000212 URL |
[84] |
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356-376.
doi: 10.2307/259182 URL |
[85] |
Mathieu, J. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., van Knippenberg, D., & Ilgen, D. R. (2017). A century of work teams in the journal of applied psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 452-467.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000128 pmid: 28150984 |
[86] |
Murphy, W. M. (2012). Reverse mentoring at work: Fostering cross-generational learning and developing millennial leaders. Human Resource Management, 51(4), 549-573.
doi: 10.1002/hrm.v51.4 URL |
[87] |
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
doi: 10.2307/259373 URL |
[88] |
Nifadkar, S. S., & Bauer, T. N. (2016). Breach of belongingness: Newcomer relationship conflict, information, and task- related outcomes during organizational socialization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 1-13.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000035 pmid: 26052711 |
[89] |
Ozer, M., & Zhang, W. (2015). The effects of geographic and network ties on exploitative and exploratory product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 36(7), 1105-1114.
doi: 10.1002/smj.2015.36.issue-7 URL |
[90] |
Ragins, B. R., & McFarlin, D. B. (1990). Perceptions of mentor roles in cross-gender mentoring relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37(3), 321-339.
doi: 10.1016/0001-8791(90)90048-7 URL |
[91] |
Raj, A., Dwivedi, G., Sharma, A., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., & Rajak, S. (2019). Barriers to the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: An inter- country comparative perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, Article 107546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107546
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107546 |
[92] |
Rulke, D. L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2000). Distribution of knowledge, group network structure, and group performance. Management Science, 46(5), 612-625.
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.5.612.12052 URL |
[93] |
Scandura, T. A. (1992). Mentorship and career mobility: An empirical investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 169-174.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379 URL |
[94] |
Scandura, T. A. (1997). Mentoring and organizational justice: An empirical investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51(1), 58-69.
doi: 10.1006/jvbe.1997.1588 URL |
[95] |
Scandura, T. A., & Ragins, B. R. (1993). The effects of sex and gender role orientation on mentorship in male- dominated occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43(3), 251-265.
doi: 10.1006/jvbe.1993.1046 URL |
[96] |
Schippers, M. C., West, M. A., & Dawson, J. F. (2015). Team reflexivity and innovation: The moderating role of team context. Journal of Management, 41(3), 769-788.
doi: 10.1177/0149206312441210 URL |
[97] |
Seeber, I., Bittner, E., Briggs, R. O., De Vreede, T., De Vreede, G. J., Elkins, A.,... Söllner, M. (2020). Machines as teammates: A research agenda on AI in team collaboration. Information & Management, 57(2), Article 103174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103174
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103174 |
[98] |
Seibert, S. E., Silver, S. R., & Randolph, W. A. (2004). Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 332-349.
doi: 10.2307/20159585 URL |
[99] | Shehadeh, M. A., Schroeder, S., Richert, A., & Jeschke, S. (2017, October). Hybrid teams of industry 4.0: A work place considering robots as key players. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) (pp. 1208-1213). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. |
[100] |
Snoeren, M. M., Raaijmakers, R., Niessen, T. J., & Abma, T. A. (2016). Mentoring with (in) care: A co-constructed auto- ethnography of mutual learning. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(1), 3-22.
doi: 10.1002/job.2011 URL |
[101] |
van Emmerik, H., Baugh, S. G., & Euwema, M. C. (2005). Who wants to be a mentor? an examination of attitudinal, instrumental, and social motivational components. Career Development International, 10(4), 310-324.
doi: 10.1108/13620430510609145 URL |
[102] | Wanberg, C. R., Welsh, E. T., & Hezlett, S. A. (2003). Mentoring research:A review and dynamic process model. In J. J. Martocchio & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 22, pp. 39-124). Elsevier Science Ltd. |
[103] | West, M. A. (2000). Reflexivity, revolution and innovation in work teams. In M. Beyerlein, D. Johnson, & S. Beyerlein (Eds.), Product development teams: Vol. 5: Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams (pp. 1-29). Stamford, USA: Jai Press. |
[104] |
Wynne, K. T., & Lyons, J. B. (2018). An integrative model of autonomous agent teammate-likeness. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 19(3), 353-374.
doi: 10.1080/1463922X.2016.1260181 URL |
[105] |
Xie, Y., Xue, W., Li, L., Wang, A., Chen, Y., Zheng, Q.,... Li, X. (2018). Leadership style and innovation atmosphere in enterprises: An empirical study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 257-265.
doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.017 URL |
[106] |
Xu, X., Jiang, L., & Wang, H. J. (2019). How to build your team for innovation? A cross-level mediation model of team personality, team climate for innovation, creativity, and job crafting. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(4), 848-872.
doi: 10.1111/joop.v92.4 URL |
[107] |
Yang, J. (2005). Knowledge integration and innovation: Securing new product advantage in high technology industry. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 16(1), 121-135.
doi: 10.1016/j.hitech.2005.06.007 URL |
[108] |
Yukawa, J. (2006). Co-reflection in online learning: Collaborative critical thinking as narrative. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 203-228.
doi: 10.1007/s11412-006-8994-9 URL |
[109] |
Zhang, Y., Robinson, D. K., Porter, A. L., Zhu, D., Zhang, G., & Lu, J. (2016). Technology roadmapping for competitive technical intelligence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 110, 175-186.
doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.029 URL |
[110] |
Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2012). How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1090-1102.
doi: 10.1002/smj.1959 URL |
[1] | MENG Liang, LI Dandan. Revisiting family motivation from the actor versus observer perspectives [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(8): 1342-1358. |
[2] | SHI Guanfeng, WU Yuying, PANG Huiwei, LIU Zhaohui, XIE Zhihui. Structural measures, multidimensional effects and formation mechanisms of workplace fear of missing out [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(8): 1374-1388. |
[3] | ZHANG Xufan, ZHANG Wenjian. How does team growth mindsets effect team innovation? A perspective from attention composition and attention configuration [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(8): 1389-1410. |
[4] | SHI Yanwei, XIE Julan, WANG Yani, ZHAGN Nan. Digital job crafting and its positive impact on job performance: The perspective of individual-task-technology fit [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(7): 1133-1145. |
[5] | LIU Beini, ZHANG Zhixue. What enables teams to “bounce back” from adversity? The influence of leader mindfulness on team resilience [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(7): 1146-1159. |
[6] | XIAO Sufang, XU Zhengli. Conceptualization of voice-taking and its effect on work behaviors: From the perspective of regulatory focus theory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 697-708. |
[7] | ZOU Yanchun, ZHANG Huimin, PENG Jian, TIAN Yiwen. Environmentally specific servant leadership: Consequences and their underlying mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 827-839. |
[8] | WANG Song, ZHANG Liaodan, LUAN Kun. The concept of employee networking behavior and its influence mechanisms on working outcomes [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 840-853. |
[9] | ZHANG Ying, ZHANG Jian, ZHANG Jingya, GONG Zhenxing. A new categorization of career shocks and their effects based on different theoretical explanations [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 854-865. |
[10] | LI Jie, ZHANG Zhenzhen, LIANG Qiaozhuan, LI Genqiang. The conversion mechanism and double-edged sword effect of expressed leader humility from the perspective of leader authenticity [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 570-581. |
[11] | GUO Li, JIA Suosuo, LI Guiquan, LI Manlin. Lonely at the top? Exploring the multi-level double-edged sword effect of leader workplace loneliness [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 582-596. |
[12] | YANG Mengxi, LIN Yuying, CHEN Wansi, CHEN Xuan, BAO Hongying, LI Xinyu. Double-edged sword effect of supervisor bottom-line mentality on team innovation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(3): 361-370. |
[13] | SUN Hui, XU Jie. Prompt reply: Workplace telepressure in the information and communications technology (ICT) era [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(3): 467-479. |
[14] | WAN Jin, ZHOU Wenjun, ZHOU Haiming, LI Pingping, SHI Kan. The impact of psychological detachment on work engagement: Promotion or inhibition? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(2): 209-222. |
[15] | LI Yongjuan, XU Yuanyuan, WANG Moran, XUE Junti, FENG Yuting, XU Yaoshan. Safety management actions improvement as leverage for safety climate promotion in high-risk industries [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(1): 33-44. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||