Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 411-424.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2025.0411
• Meta-Analysis • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Hu1, LI Jianguo1(), ZENG Lei1, SU Lingjie2
Received:
2024-09-02
Online:
2025-03-15
Published:
2025-01-24
CLC Number:
LI Hu, LI Jianguo, ZENG Lei, SU Lingjie. A meta-analysis of the influence of work connectivity behavior after-hours on employees: The mediating role of work autonomy and psychological detachment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2025, 33(3): 411-424.
变量 | Q | df(Q) | I2 | Tau2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
工作自主性 | 128.49*** | 18 | 85.99 | 0.01 |
心理脱离 | 374.61*** | 28 | 92.53 | 0.03 |
工作−家庭平衡 | 67.56*** | 11 | 83.72 | 0.01 |
任务绩效 | 655.87*** | 16 | 97.56 | 0.14 |
变量 | Q | df(Q) | I2 | Tau2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
工作自主性 | 128.49*** | 18 | 85.99 | 0.01 |
心理脱离 | 374.61*** | 28 | 92.53 | 0.03 |
工作−家庭平衡 | 67.56*** | 11 | 83.72 | 0.01 |
任务绩效 | 655.87*** | 16 | 97.56 | 0.14 |
变量 | Egger检验 | Begg检验 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
截距项 | p | Z | p | |
工作自主性 | −2.00 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.40 |
心理脱离 | 3.11 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.90 |
工作−家庭平衡 | 1.03 | 0.57 | 0.48 | 0.63 |
任务绩效 | 7.05 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
变量 | Egger检验 | Begg检验 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
截距项 | p | Z | p | |
工作自主性 | −2.00 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.40 |
心理脱离 | 3.11 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.90 |
工作−家庭平衡 | 1.03 | 0.57 | 0.48 | 0.63 |
任务绩效 | 7.05 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
变量 | k | N | ρ | SD | 95% CI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
工作自主性 | 19 | 12737 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.24 |
心理脱离 | 29 | 10583 | −0.38 | 0.04 | −0.44 | −0.32 |
工作−家庭平衡 | 12 | 5665 | −0.24 | 0.01 | −0.30 | −0.17 |
任务绩效 | 17 | 5147 | 0.06 | 0.06 | −0.13 | 0.23 |
变量 | k | N | ρ | SD | 95% CI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
工作自主性 | 19 | 12737 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.24 |
心理脱离 | 29 | 10583 | −0.38 | 0.04 | −0.44 | −0.32 |
工作−家庭平衡 | 12 | 5665 | −0.24 | 0.01 | −0.30 | −0.17 |
任务绩效 | 17 | 5147 | 0.06 | 0.06 | −0.13 | 0.23 |
变量 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. WCBA | 1 | ||||
2. 工作自主性 (k, N) | 0.18 (19, 12737) | 1 | |||
3. 心理脱离 (k, N) | −0.38 (29, 10583) | 0.06a (20, 11570) | 1 | ||
4. 工作−家庭平衡 (k, N) | −0.24 (12, 5665) | 0.28b (15, 17619) | 0.52 (10, 2260) | 1 | |
5. 任务绩效 (k, N) | 0.06 (17, 5147) | 0.28c (46, 11937) | 0.09a (8, 4551) | 0.38 (7, 1834) | 1 |
变量 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. WCBA | 1 | ||||
2. 工作自主性 (k, N) | 0.18 (19, 12737) | 1 | |||
3. 心理脱离 (k, N) | −0.38 (29, 10583) | 0.06a (20, 11570) | 1 | ||
4. 工作−家庭平衡 (k, N) | −0.24 (12, 5665) | 0.28b (15, 17619) | 0.52 (10, 2260) | 1 | |
5. 任务绩效 (k, N) | 0.06 (17, 5147) | 0.28c (46, 11937) | 0.09a (8, 4551) | 0.38 (7, 1834) | 1 |
变量 | 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | 模型4 | 模型5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFI | 0.98 | 0.84 | 0.94 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
SRMR | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.03 |
RMSEA | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.30 | 0.11 |
χ2 (df) | 103.87(1) | 670.03(3) | 273.64(2) | 904.67(2) | 113.46(2) |
Δχ2 (Δdf) | 566.16(2)*** | 169.77(1)*** | 800.80(1)*** | 9.59(1)** |
变量 | 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | 模型4 | 模型5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFI | 0.98 | 0.84 | 0.94 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
SRMR | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.03 |
RMSEA | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.30 | 0.11 |
χ2 (df) | 103.87(1) | 670.03(3) | 273.64(2) | 904.67(2) | 113.46(2) |
Δχ2 (Δdf) | 566.16(2)*** | 169.77(1)*** | 800.80(1)*** | 9.59(1)** |
路径 | 间接效应 | 95% CI |
---|---|---|
WCBA→工作自主性→工作−家庭平衡 | 0.05*** | [0.04, 0.06] |
WCBA→心理脱离→工作−家庭平衡 | −0.18*** | [−0.19, −0.16] |
Dif1 | −0.13*** | [−0.14, −0.11] |
WCBA→工作自主性→任务绩效 | 0.05*** | [0.04, 0.06] |
WCBA→心理脱离→任务绩效 | −0.03*** | [−0.04, −0.02] |
Dif2 | 0.01* | [0.00, 0.02] |
路径 | 间接效应 | 95% CI |
---|---|---|
WCBA→工作自主性→工作−家庭平衡 | 0.05*** | [0.04, 0.06] |
WCBA→心理脱离→工作−家庭平衡 | −0.18*** | [−0.19, −0.16] |
Dif1 | −0.13*** | [−0.14, −0.11] |
WCBA→工作自主性→任务绩效 | 0.05*** | [0.04, 0.06] |
WCBA→心理脱离→任务绩效 | −0.03*** | [−0.04, −0.02] |
Dif2 | 0.01* | [0.00, 0.02] |
(纳入元分析的文献请见网络版附录) | |
[1] | 陈兴华, 凌文辁, 方俐洛. (2004). 工作-家庭冲突及其平衡策略. 外国经济与管理, 26(4), 16-19. |
[2] |
韩志伟, 程延园, 任志帅, 王丹阳, 李国静. (2024). 工作连通行为与工作-生活冲突的元分析: 基于工作-家庭资源模型的视角. 心理科学进展, 32(12), 2031-2049.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.02031 |
[3] | 胡君辰, 李荣华. (2022). “恢复体验”为何重要: 文献述评与未来展望. 管理现代化, 42(2), 148-154. |
[4] |
李超平, 孟雪, 胥彦, 蓝媛美. (2023). 家庭支持型主管行为对员工的影响与作用机制: 基于元分析的证据. 心理学报, 55(2), 257-271.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.00257 |
[5] | 马红宇, 谢菊兰, 唐汉瑛, 申传刚, 张晓翔. (2016). 工作性通信工具使用与双职工夫妻的幸福感: 基于溢出-交叉效应的分析. 心理学报, 48(1), 48-58. |
[6] | 石冠峰, 郑雄. (2021). 非工作时间工作连通行为对工作繁荣的"双刃剑"影响. 软科学, 35(4), 106-111. |
[7] | 孙健敏, 杨梅, 赵景. (2024). 工作资源无法满足我的工作需求: 非工作时间连通行为对工作-家庭平衡的损耗. 商业经济与管理, (8), 40-50. |
[8] | 王晶, 吴明霞, 廖礼惠, 吴梅宝. (2010). 国外工作-家庭平衡研究的现状述评. 心理科学进展, 18(8), 1269-1276. |
[9] | 王晓辰, 徐乃赞, 刘剑, 李清. (2019). 非工作时间连通行为对工作-家庭平衡满意度的影响研究: 一个有调节的中介模型. 心理科学, 42(4), 956-962. |
[10] | 王杨阳, 杨婷婷, 苗心萌, 宋国萍. (2021). 非工作时间使用手机工作与员工生活满意度: 心理脱离的中介作用和动机的调节作用. 心理科学, 44(2), 405-411. |
[11] | 卫旭华. (2021). 组织与管理研究中的元分析方法. 科学出版社. |
[12] |
温忠麟, 方杰, 谢晋艳, 欧阳劲樱. (2022). 国内中介效应的方法学研究. 心理科学进展, 30(8), 1692-1702.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.01692 |
[13] | 叶萌, 唐汉瑛, 谢菊兰, 马红宇, 岳闪闪. (2018). 非工作时间使用通信技术处理工作的"双刃剑"效应及心理机制. 心理科学, 41(1), 160-166. |
[14] | 袁凌, 童瑶, 王钧力. (2023). 非工作时间工作连通行为对员工创造力的双刃剑效应: 基于赋权奴役悖论. 科技进步与对策, 40(11), 141-150. |
[15] | 张兰霞, 蔡丽, 付竞瑶, 李末芝. (2020). 员工非工作时间工作连通行为对创造力的双路径影响模型. 技术经济, 39(2), 46-54+63. |
[16] | 张晓翔, 马红宇, 谢菊兰, 唐汉瑛, 周殷. (2013). 工作-家庭中心性与心理解脱: 非工作时间工作连通行为的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(6), 1008-1012. |
[17] | 赵慧军, 焦昕婷. (2023). 非工作时间工作连通行为如何引发工作退缩行为?——基于资源保存理论视角. 安徽大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 47(3), 123-132. |
[18] | 赵越, 王艳平, 王琛, 李行翔, 陈雨欣. (2024). 非工作时间工作连通行为影响工作感受和工作行为的元分析研究. 应用心理学, (7), 1-18. |
[19] | Abendroth, A. K., & Den Dulk, L. (2011). Support for the work-life balance in Europe: The impact of state, workplace and family support on work-life balance satisfaction. Work, Employment and Society, 25(2), 234-256. |
[20] | Beckel, J. L., Kunz, J. J., Prasad, J. J., Finch, H. M., & Kaldahl, K. N. (2023). The impact of telework on conflict between work and family: A meta-analytic investigation. Occupational Health Science, 7(4), 681-706. |
[21] |
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50(4), 1088-1101.
pmid: 7786990 |
[22] | Belkin, L. Y., Becker, W. J., & Conroy, S. A. (2020). The invisible leash: The impact of organizational expectations for email monitoring after-hours on employee resources, well-being, and turnover intentions. Group & Organization Management, 45(5), 709-740. |
[23] | Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99-109. |
[24] | Boswell, W. R., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (2007). The use of communication technologies after hours: The role of work attitudes and work-life conflict. Journal of Management, 33(4), 592-610. |
[25] |
Casper, W. J., Vaziri, H., Wayne, J. H., DeHauw, S., & Greenhaus, J. (2018). The Jingle-Jangle of work-nonwork balance: A comprehensive and meta-analytic review of its meaning and measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(2), 182-214.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000259 pmid: 29016161 |
[26] | Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Nassrelgrgawi, A. S. (2016). Performance, incentives, and needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness: A meta-analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 40, 781-813. |
[27] | Coffeng, J. K., van Sluijs, E. M., Hendriksen, I. J., van Mechelen, W., & Boot, C. R. (2015). Physical activity and relaxation during and after work are independently associated with the need for recovery. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 12(1), 109-115. |
[28] | De Bloom, J., Geurts, S. A., & Kompier, M. A. (2013). Vacation (after-) effects on employee health and well-being, and the role of vacation activities, experiences and sleep. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(2), 613-633. |
[29] | Derks, D., Bakker, A. B., Peters, P., & van Wingerden, P. (2016). Work-related smartphone use, work-family conflict and family role performance: The role of segmentation preference. Human Relations, 69(5), 1045-1068. |
[30] |
Derks, D., Van Mierlo, H., & Schmitz, E. B. (2014). A diary study on work-related smartphone use, psychological detachment and exhaustion: Examining the role of the perceived segmentation norm. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(1), 74-84.
doi: 10.1037/a0035076 pmid: 24447222 |
[31] | Dettmers, J. (2017). How extended work availability affects well-being: The mediating roles of psychological detachment and work-family-conflict. Work & Stress, 31(1), 24-41. |
[32] | Dettmers, J., Bamberg, E., & Seffzek, K. (2016). Characteristics of extended availability for work: The role of demands and resources. International Journal of Stress Management, 23(3), 276-297. |
[33] | Diaz, I., Chiaburu, D. S., Zimmerman, R. D., & Boswell, W. R. (2012). Communication technology: Pros and cons of constant connection to work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 500-508. |
[34] | Ďuranová, L., & Ohly, S. (2016). Persistent work-related technology use, recovery and well-being processes: Focus on supplemental work after hours. Springer. |
[35] | Eden, D. (2001). Job stress and respite relief:Overcoming high-tech tethers. In P. L. Perrewé, & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Exploring the Oretical Mechanisms and Perspectives (pp. 143-194). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. |
[36] | Egger, M., Smith, G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629-634. |
[37] | Eichberger, C., Derks, D., & Zacher, H. (2021). Technology- assisted supplemental work, psychological detachment, and employee well-being: A daily diary study. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 35(2), 199-223. |
[38] | Fender, C. M. (2010). Electronic tethering: Perpetual wireless connectivity to the organization [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Drexel University. |
[39] | Fenner, G. H., & Renn, R. W. (2010). Technology-assisted supplemental work and work-to-family conflict: The role of instrumentality beliefs, organizational expectations and time management. Human Relations, 63(1), 63-82. |
[40] |
Ferguson, M., Carlson, D., Boswell, W., Whitten, D., Butts, M. M., & Kacmar, K. M. (2016). Tethered to work: A family systems approach linking mobile device use to turnover intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(4), 520-534.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000075 pmid: 26653530 |
[41] | Fritz, C., Sonnentag, S., Spector, P. E., & McInroe, J. A. (2010). The weekend matters: Relationships between stress recovery and affective experiences. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(8), 1137-1162. |
[42] | Greenhaus, J., & Allen, T. D. (2011). Work-family balance:A review and extension of the literature. In J. C. Quick, & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (pp. 183-265). American Psychological Association. |
[43] | Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279. |
[44] | Harrison, D. A., Newman, D. A., & Roth, P. L. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 305-325. |
[45] | Headrick, L., Newman, D. A., Park, Y. A., & Liang, Y. (2023). Recovery experiences for work and health outcomes: A meta-analysis and recovery-engagement-exhaustion model. Journal of Business and Psychology, 38(4), 821-864. |
[46] |
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524.
doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.44.3.513 pmid: 2648906 |
[47] | Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337-421. |
[48] | Hobfoll, S. E. (2011). Conservation of resources theory: Its implication for stress, health, and resilience. In S. Folkman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping (pp. 127-147). Oxford University Press. |
[49] | Hunter, J. E. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA. |
[50] |
Jak, S., & Cheung, M. W. L. (2018). Accounting for missing correlation coefficients in fixed-effects MASEM. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(1), 1-14.
doi: 10.1080/00273171.2017.1375886 pmid: 29220593 |
[51] | Lapierre, L. M., Li, Y., Kwan, H. K., Greenhaus, J. H., DiRenzo, M. S., & Shao, P. (2018). A meta-analysis of the antecedents of work-family enrichment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(4), 385-401. |
[52] | Lee, S., Zhou, Z. E., Xie, J., & Guo, H. (2021). Work-related use of information and communication technologies after hours and employee fatigue: The exacerbating effect of affective commitment. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 36(6), 477-490. |
[53] | Leslie, L. M., Mayer, D. M., & Kravitz, D. A. (2014). The stigma of affirmative action: A stereotyping- based theory and meta-analytic test of the consequences for performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 964-989. |
[54] |
Liao, E. Y., Lau, V. P., Hui, R. T. Y., & Kong, K. H. (2019). A resource-based perspective on work-family conflict: Meta-analytical findings. Career Development International, 24(1), 37-73.
doi: 10.1108/CDI-12-2017-0236 |
[55] | Muecke, S., & Iseke, A. (2019). How does job autonomy influence job performance? A meta-analytic test of theoretical mechanisms. Academy of Management Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.145 |
[56] | Ohly, S., & Latour, A. (2014). Work-related smartphone use and well-being in the evening. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 13(4), 174-183. |
[57] | Pak, S., Kramer, A., Lee, Y., & Kim, K. J. (2022). The impact of work hours on work-to-family enrichment and conflict through energy processes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(4), 709-743. |
[58] |
Park, Y., Fritz, C., & Jex, S. M. (2011). Relationships between work-home segmentation and psychological detachment from work: The role of communication technology use at home. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(4), 457-467.
doi: 10.1037/a0023594 pmid: 21728434 |
[59] | Peng, A. C., & Kim, D. (2020). A meta-analytic test of the differential pathways linking ethical leadership to normative conduct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(4), 348-368. |
[60] | Perlow, L. A. (2012). Sleeping with your smartphone: How to break the 24/7 habit and change the way you work. Harvard Business Review Press. |
[61] | Preacher, K. J., & Selig, J. P. (2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 77-98. |
[62] | Ragsdale, J. M., & Hoover, C. S. (2016). Cell phones during nonwork time: A source of job demands and resources. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 54-60. |
[63] | Ren, S., Hu, J., Tang, G., & Chadee, D. (2023). Digital connectivity for work after hours: Its curvilinear relationship with employee job performance. Personnel Psychology, 76(3), 731-757. |
[64] | Richardson, K., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2011). Examining the antecedents of work connectivity behavior during non- work time. Information and Organization, 21(3), 142-160. |
[65] | Richardson, K. M., & Thompson, C. (2012). High tech tethers and work-family conflict: A conservation of resources approach. Engineering Management Research, 1, 29-43. |
[66] | Roth, T. L., Puig-Saus, C., Yu, R., Shifrut, E., Carnevale, J., Li, P. J., ... Marson, A. (2018). Reprogramming human T cell function and specificity with non-viral genome targeting. Nature, 559(7714), 405-409. |
[67] | Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In H. R., Rothstei, A. J., Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.), Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment & adjustments (pp. 1-7). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons. |
[68] | Schlachter, S., McDowall, A., Cropley, M., & Inceoglu, I. (2018). Voluntary work-related technology use during non-work time: A narrative synthesis of empirical research and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(4), 825-846. |
[69] | Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2015). Recovery from job stress: The stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S72-S103. |
[70] | Tennakoon, K. L. U. (2021). Empowerment or enslavement: The impact of technology-driven work intrusions on work-life balance. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 38(4), 414-429. |
[71] | Thörel, E., Pauls, N., & Göritz, A. (2022). The association of work-related extended availability with recuperation, well-being, life domain balance and work: A meta-analysis. Organizational Psychology Review, 12, 387-427. |
[72] | Vaziri, H., Wayne, J. H., Casper, W. J., Lapierre, L. M., Greenhaus, J. H., Amirkamali, F., & Li, Y. (2022). A meta- analytic investigation of the personal and work-related antecedents of work-family balance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(4), 662-692. |
[73] | Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 865-885. |
[74] | Wang, R., Li, Z., Bu, C., & Zhu, W. (2023). Work connectivity behavior after-hours spills over to cyberloafing: The roles of motivation and workaholism. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 38(8), 597-610. |
[75] | Ward, S., & Steptoe-Warren, G. (2014). A conservation of resources approach to BlackBerry use, work-family conflict and well-being: Job control and psychological detachment from work as potential mediators. Engineering Management Research, 3(1), 8-23. |
[76] | Weigelt, O., & Syrek, C. J. (2017). Ovsiankina’s great relief: How supplemental work during the weekend may contribute to recovery in the face of unfinished tasks. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(12), 1606. |
[77] | Wendsche, J., & Lohmann-Haislah, A. (2017). A meta- analysis on antecedents and outcomes of detachment from work. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2072. |
[78] | Xie, J., Ma, H., Zhou, Z. E., & Tang, H. (2018). Work-related use of information and communication technologies after hours (W_ICTs) and emotional exhaustion: A mediated moderation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 94-104. |
[79] | Yang, Y., Yan, R., & Meng, Y. (2022). Can’t Disconnect Even After-Hours: How Work Connectivity Behavior After-Hours Affects Employees’ Thriving at Work and Family. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 865776. |
[80] | Zhu, F., Gao, Y., & Chen, X. (2024). Freedom or bondage? The double-edged sword effect of work connectivity behavior after-hours on employee occupational mental health. Chinese Management Studies, 18(1), 265-285. |
[1] | TIAN Renxia, YANG Ping, GUO Yuanyuan, WU Xia. Treatment of autism spectrum disorder: The potential role of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2025, 33(4): 598-610. |
[2] | ZHANG Jing, MENG Yu, ZHANG Meng, CHEN Huiya. Effects of empolyee mindfulness on job performance and the mediating mechanisms: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2025, 33(4): 647-672. |
[3] | CHEN Silu, ZHANG Guanglei, LIU Wenxing, TIAN Yuan. The driving mechanism and its function mechanism of gratitude-focused human resource management practices [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(6): 908-927. |
[4] | YAN Ming, ZHENG Shi. Segmentation or integration? The managerial approach to work-family balance in the age of virtual team work [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(5): 754-770. |
[5] | FENG Pan, ZHAO Hengyue, JIANG Yumeng, ZHANG Yuetong, FENG Tingyong. Cognitive neural mechanisms underlying the impact of oxytocin on conditioned fear processing [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(4): 557-567. |
[6] | HAN Zhiwei, CHENG Yanyuan, REN Zhishuai, WANG Danyang, LI Guojing. A meta-analysis of work connectivity behavior after-hours and work-life conflict: Based on the work-home resources model [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(12): 2031-2049. |
[7] | Yiru Huang, Zitian Liu, Zidong Chen, Yanyan Wu, Minbin Yu. Visual Training Enhances Visual Cortex Plasticity to Restore Vision from Amblyopia in Adult Mice [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 130-130. |
[8] | Wenjun Huang, Bao Hong, Jiahe Wu, Jing Chen, Li Li. Investigating Brain Structural Correlates of Ocular Tracking in Preadolescent Children and Young Adults [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 141-141. |
[9] | Yiru Huang, Zitian Liu, Zidong Chen, Yanyan Wu, Daming Deng, Fang-Fang Yan, Chang-Bing Huang, Minbin Yu. Cortical Reorganization after Axial Alignment in Older Children and Adults with Strabismus [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 152-152. |
[10] | Baoqi GONG, Wei JIN, Pinglei BAO. Object Space as the Foundation for Object Recognition in the Human Ventral Temporal Cortex [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 153-153. |
[11] | Zheng Ye, Shunshun Chen, Hongyan Lu, Jian Ding, Qingyan Sun, Tianmiao Hua. A Study on Information Encoding Strategies in V1 and V4 Cortex of Cat During Visual Contrast Detection [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 154-154. |
[12] | Zu Guangyao, Li Shuqi, Zhang Tianyang, Wang Aijun, Zhang Ming. Effect of inhibition of return on audiovisual cross-modal correspondence [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 183-183. |
[13] | Mengting Chen, Nan Jiang, Jiawei Zhou, Seung Hyun Min. Examination of Interocular Delay in Anisomyopia [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 3-3. |
[14] | Wei Huang, Hengjiang Li, Diwei Wu, Huafu Chen, Hongmei Yan. Language Decoding for Visual Perception Based on Transformer [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 11-11. |
[15] | ZHOU Shiren, QIU Xiufu, HE Zhenhong, ZHANG Dandan. Non-invasive brain stimulation-based emotion regulation interventions [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(8): 1477-1495. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||