Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 1961-1979.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.01961
• Conceptual Framework • Previous Articles Next Articles
BAI Xinwen1,2, QI Shuting3,4, WANG Zhuojun1,2, REN Siyu1,2, SUN Wen1,2
Received:
2024-01-07
Online:
2024-12-15
Published:
2024-09-24
CLC Number:
BAI Xinwen, QI Shuting, WANG Zhuojun, REN Siyu, SUN Wen. The double-edged sword effect of rivalry on decision-makers’ creativity recognition: An information processing perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(12): 1961-1979.
[1] 白新文, 齐舒婷, 明晓东, 周意勇, 黄明权.(2019). 骏马易见, 伯乐难寻:决策者心智模式影响创意识别的机制及边界条件. [2] 董念念, 王雪莉. (2020). 有志者, 事竟成:内在动机倾向, 创意质量与创意实施. [3] 郭名媛, 杨欢维. (2017. 共享单车的“橙黄大战”——ofo与摩拜的动态竞争. 中国管理案例共享中心(案例编号: EPSM-0195). 2023-03-10取自: 2017). 共享单车的“橙黄大战”——ofo与摩拜的动态竞争. 中国管理案例共享中心(案例编号: EPSM-0195). 2023-03-10取自: http://www.cmcc-dlut.cn/ Cases/Detail/2775 [4] 霍伟伟, 罗瑾琏, 李鲜苗, 黄懿. (2018). 好创意为何易“夭折”: 创意领地视角的多层次研究. [5] 李艳, 杨百寅.(2016). 创意实施 [6] 齐舒婷, 白新文, 林琳.(2019). 慧眼识珠:创意识别的研究现状及未来方向. [7] 齐舒婷, 周意勇, 白新文. (2021). 决策者的组织创新困境及创意识别偏差的心理机制. 见:胡卫平 (编), 中国创造力研究进展报告 (pp. 264-276). 陕西师范大学出版总社. [8] 吴梦, 白新文.(2012). 动机性信息加工理论及其在工业与组织心理学中的应用. [9] 许长勇, 翟丹华, 李风华, 果飒. (2019. 共享单车:风投是天使还是魔鬼. 中国管理案例共享中心(案例编号: MSL-0043). 2023-03-10取自: 2019). 共享单车:风投是天使还是魔鬼. 中国管理案例共享中心(案例编号: MSL-0043). 2023-03-10取自: http://www.cmcc-dlut.cn/ Cases/Detail/3753 [10] 周意勇, 白新文, 齐舒婷. (2020). 领导认可你的创造力吗? [11] Adam M. T.P., Krämer, J., & Müller, M. B.(2015). Auction fever! How time pressure and social competition affect bidders’ arousal and bids in retail auctions. [12] Ager P., Bursztyn L., Leucht L., & Voth H. -J. (2022). Killer incentives: Rivalry, performance and risk-taking among german fighter pilots, 1939-45. Review of Economic Studies, 89(5), 2257-2292. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/ rdab085 [13] Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations.Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167. [14] Anderson N., Potocnik K., & Zhou J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128 [15] Antons D.,& Piller, F. T.(2015). Opening the black box of “not invented here”: Attitudes, decision biases, and behavioral consequences. [16] Assanskiy A., Shaposhnikov D., Tylkin I.,& Vasiliev, G.(2022). Prove them wrong: Do professional athletes perform better when facing their former clubs? [17] Baer, M. (2012). Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. [18] Bechtoldt M. N., De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad B. A., & Choi H. S. (2010). Motivated information processing, social tuning, and group creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 622-637. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0019386 [19] Berg, J. M. (2016). Balancing on the creative high-wire: Forecasting the success of novel ideas in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(3), 433-468. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0001839216642211 [20] Boudreau K., Guinan E. C., Lakhani K. R.,& Riedl, C.(2016). Looking across and looking beyond the knowledge frontier: Intellectual distance, novelty, and resource allocation in science. [21] Buckert M., Schwieren C., Kudielka B. M.,& Fiebach, C. J.(2017). How stressful are economic competitions in the lab? An investigation with physiological measures. [22] Chaiken S.,& Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. Guilford Press.. [23] Chen M.-J.(1996). Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. [24] Chen, M. -J., & Miller, D. (2012). Competitive dynamics: Themes, trends, and a prospective research platform. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 135-210. https:// doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.660762 [25] Clarke J. S., Cornelissen J. P.,& Healey, M.(2019). Actions speak louder than words: How figurative language and gesturing in entrepreneurial pitches influences investment judgments. [26] Converse, B. A., & Reinhard, D. A. (2016). On rivalry and goal pursuit: Shared competitive history, legacy concerns, and strategy selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(2), 191-213. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000038 [27] Converse B. A., Reinhard D. A., & Austin, M. M. K. (2021). Psychology of rivalry: A social-cognitive approach to competitive relationships In S M Garcia, A Tor, & A J Elliot (Eds), The Oxford handbook of the psychology of competition (pp 422-443) Oxford University Press https://doiorg/101093/oxfordhb/9780190060800 A social-cognitive approach to competitive relationships. In S. M. Garcia, A. Tor, & A. J. Elliot (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the psychology of competition (pp. 422-443). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190060800.013.18 [28] Correa, J. A., & Ornaghi, C. (2014). Competition & innovation: Evidence from U.S. Patent and productivity data. [29] Criscuolo P., Dahlander L., Grohsjean T.,& Salter, A.(2017). Evaluating novelty: The role of panels in the selection of R&D projects. [30] Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313-335). Cambridge University Press. [31] De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad B. A., & van Knippenberg D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(1), 22-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307304092 [32] Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of co-operation and competition. Human Relations, 2(2), 129-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 001872674900200204 [33] Duan J., Yin J.,& Xu, Y.(2022). Distance makes the heart grow fonder: A construal-level perspective on entrepreneurial opportunity evaluation. [34] Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 255-278. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.psych.59.103006.093629 [35] Ford, C. M., & Gioia, D. A. (2000). Factors influencing creativity in the domain of managerial decision making. Journal of Management, 26(4), 705-732. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/014920630002600406 [36] Galinsky A. D., Magee J. C., Gruenfeld D. H., Whitson J. A., & Liljenquist K. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1450-1466. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012633 [37] George, J. M. (2007). Creativity in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 439-477. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/078559814 [38] Guo W., Sengul M.,& Yu, T.(2020). Rivals' negative earnings surprises, language signals, and firms' competitive actions. [39] Haselhuhn M. P., Wong E. M.,& Ormiston, M. E.(2022). Investors respond negatively to executives’ discussion of creativity. [40] Hill L. A., Tedards E., & Swan T. (2021). Drive innovation with better decision-making: Don't let old habits undermine your organization's creativity.Harvard Business Review, 99(6), 70-79. [41] Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121-140. https:// doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791606 [42] Huang S. -C., Lin S. C., & Zhang Y. (2019). When individual goal pursuit turns competitive: How we sabotage and coast. [43] Jiang L., Yin D., Liu D., & Johnson R. (2023). The more enthusiastic, the better? Unveiling a negative pathway from entrepreneurs’ displayed enthusiasm to funders’ funding intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(4), 1356-1388. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587221076391 [44] Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982). Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. [45] Kilduff, G. J. (2014). Driven to win: Rivalry, motivation, and performance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(8), 944-952. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614539770 [46] Kilduff G. J.(2019). Interfirm relational rivalry: Implications for competitive strategy. [47] Kilduff G. J., Elfenbein H. A.,& Staw, B. M.(2010). The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition. [48] Kilduff G. J.,& Galinsky, A. D.(2017). The spark that ignites: Mere exposure to rivals increases machiavellianism and unethical behavior. [49] Kilduff G. J., Galinsky A. D., Gallo E.,& Reade, J. J.(2016). Whatever it takes to win: Rivalry increases unethical behavior. [50] Kornish, L. J., & Ulrich, K. T. (2014). The importance of the raw idea in innovation: Testing the sow's ear hypothesis. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(1), 14-26. https://doi.org/ 10.1509/jmr.12.0401 [51] Krieger J. L.(2021). Trials and terminations: Learning from competitors' R&D failures. [52] Ku G., Malhotra D.,& Murnighan, J. K.(2005). Towards a competitive arousal model of decision-making: A study of auction fever in live and internet auctions. [53] Levin I. P., Huneke M. E.,& Jasper, J. D.(2000). Information processing at successive stages of decision making: Need for cognition and inclusion-exclusion effects. [54] Li J., Chen X. -P., Kotha S., & Fisher G. (2017). Catching fire and spreading it: A glimpse into displayed entrepreneurial passion in crowdfunding campaigns. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(7), 1075-1090. https://doi.org/10.1037/ apl0000217 [55] Lu S., Bartol K. M., Venkataramani V., Zheng X., & Liu X. (2019). Pitching novel ideas to the boss: The interactive effects of employees’ idea enactment and influence tactics on creativity assessment and implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 579-606. https:// doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0942 [56] Luan, Y., & Kim, Y. J. (2022). An integrative model of new product evaluation: A systematic investigation of perceived novelty and product evaluation in the movie industry. PLoS ONE, 17(3), e0265193. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0265193 [57] Malhotra, D. (2010). The desire to win: The effects of competitive arousal on motivation and behavior. [58] Markou P., Kavadias S.,& Oraiopoulos, N.(2023). Rival signals and project selection: Insights from the drug development process. [59] Menon T., Thompson L., & Choi H. -S. (2006). Tainted knowledge vs. Tempting knowledge: People avoid knowledge from internal rivals and seek knowledge from external rivals. [60] Milstein N., Striet Y., Lavidor M., Anaki D., & Gordon I. (2022). Rivalry and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Organizational Psychology Review, 12(3), 332-361. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866221082128 [61] Mount M. P., Baer M., & Lupoli M. J. (2021). Quantum leaps or baby steps? Expertise distance, construal level, and the propensity to invest in novel technological ideas. Strategic Management Journal, 42(8), 1490-1515. https:// doi.org/10.1002/smj.3267 [62] Mueller J.,& Yin, Y. (2021). Unraveling the bias against novelty: Guiding the study of our tendency to desire but reject the new. In J. Zhou & E. D. Rouse (Eds.), Handbook of research on creativity and innovation (pp. 267-289). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977272.00023 [63] Mueller J. S., Melwani S., & Goncalo J. A. (2012). The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23(1), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611421018 [64] Mueller J. S., Melwani S., Loewenstein J.,& Deal, J.(2018). Reframing the decision-makers’ dilemma: Towards a social context model of creative idea recognition. [65] Mueller J. S., Wakslak C. J.,& Krishnan, V.(2014). Construing creativity: The how and why of recognizing creative ideas. [66] Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2012). The competition- performance relation: A meta-analytic review and test of the opposing processes model of competition and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1035-1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028324 [67] Nijstad B. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., Rietzschel E. F., & Baas M. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. [68] Packalen, M., & Bhattacharya, J. (2015). New ideas in invention (NBER Working Paper No. 20922). Retrieved March 6, 2023, from https://doi.org/ 10.3386/w20922 [69] Packalen, M., & Bhattacharya, J. (2020). NIH funding and the pursuit of edge science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 12011-12016. https://doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.1910160117 [70] Perry-Smith,J. E., & Mannucci, P. V.(2017). From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. [71] Piezunka H., Lee W., Haynes R., & Bothner M. S. (2018). Escalation of competition into conflict in competitive networks of formula one drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(15), E3361-E3367. https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1717303115 [72] Pike B. E., Kilduff G. J., & Galinsky A. D. (2018). The long shadow of rivalry: Rivalry motivates performance today and tomorrow. Psychological Science, 29(5), 804- 813. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1177/0956797617744796 [73] Pirlott A. G.,& MacKinnon, D. P.(2016). Design approaches to experimental mediation. [74] Posavac S. S., Kardes F. R.,& Joško Brakus, J.(2010). Focus induced tunnel vision in managerial judgment and decision making: The peril and the antidote. [75] Qi S., Bai X., & Lin L. (2022). [76] Rassin E., Muris P., Booster E.,& Kolsloot, I.(2008). Indecisiveness and informational tunnel vision. [77] Siler K., Lee K., & Bero L. (2015). Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(2), 360-365. https:// doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418218112 [78] Spencer S. J., Zanna M. P., & Fong G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845-851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.89.6.845 [79] Staw, B. M. (1995). Why no one really wants creativity. In C. M. Ford & D. A. Gioia (Eds.), [80] Stevens G. A.,& Burley, J.(1997). 3, 000 raw ideas = 1 commercial success! [81] Swab, R. G., & Johnson, P. D. (2019). Steel sharpens steel: A review of multilevel competition and competitiveness in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(2), 147-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2340 [82] To C., Kilduff G. J., Ordonez L.,& Schweitzer, M. E.(2018). Going for it on fourth down: Rivalry increases risk-taking, physiological arousal, and promotion focus. [83] To C., Kilduff G. J.,& Rosikiewicz, B.(2020). When interpersonal competition helps and when it harms: An integration via challenge and threat. [84] Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963 [85] West, M. A. (2002). Ideas are ten a penny: It’s team implementation not idea generation that counts. Applied Psychology, 51(3), 411-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464- 0597.01006 [86] Wilden R., Lin N., Hohberger J., & Randhawa K. (2023). Selecting innovation projects: Do middle and senior managers differ when it comes to radical innovation? [87] Woodman R. W., Sawyer J. E.,& Griffin, R. W.(1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. [88] Yip J. A., Schweitzer M. E.,& Nurmohamed, S.(2018). Trash-talking: Competitive incivility motivates rivalry, performance, and unethical behavior. [89] Zhou, J., & Hoever, I. J. (2014). Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 333-359. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych- 031413-091226 [90] Zhou J., Wang X. M., Bavato D., Tasselli S., & Wu J. (2019). Understanding the receiving side of creativity: A multidisciplinary review and implications for management research. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2570-2595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319827088 [91] Zhou J., Wang X. M., Song L. J., & Wu J. (2017). Is it new? Personal and contextual influences on perceptions of novelty and creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(2), 180-202. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000166 [92] Zhou J., Wu J., & Wang X. M. (2022). Interactive effects of receiver power and generator status on endorsement of creative ideas. Journal of Management, 50(2), 620-653. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221123262 |
[1] | SU Tao, ZENG Haowen, ZHONG Xiaolin, MA Wencong, CHEN Xiude. Woe-fortune interdependence: A meta-analysis of the two-sided effect of narcissistic leadership on subordinates’ work efficiency [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(9): 1463-1487. |
[2] | LIU Zhengguang, LI Mengyin. Being a good parent helps to be a better leader? A leadership development model from parent-leader enrichment perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(9): 1551-1566. |
[3] | WANG Wangshuai, YI Yanxi, LUO Zhiwei, LI Jie. “Rat Race” or “Lying Flat”? The effect of competition stress on psychological compensation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(7): 1057-1072. |
[4] | LI Yuhui, YANG Chenlu. The concept of team temporal leadership and its mechanisms on team and individual effectiveness [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(7): 1073-1086. |
[5] | TANG Yipeng, FAN Wei, ZHANG Xiao, WANG Shuhong, XIONG Shankuo, PU Xiaoping. The effect of virtual communication styles on leadership emergence [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(6): 886-907. |
[6] | WANG Hongli, LI Zhen, ZHOU Mengnan, CHEN Zhengren. Empowerment or disempowerment: The influence of using AI on creative personality [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(12): 1990-2004. |
[7] | Yang YANG, Zhengbo CHEN, Yongchun CAI. Metaplasticity in Short-Term Monocular Deprivation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 111-111. |
[8] | Rong Jiang, Ming Meng. Integration and Suppression Interact in Binocular Vision [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 147-147. |
[9] | ZOU Yanchun, ZHANG Huimin, PENG Jian, TIAN Yiwen. Environmentally specific servant leadership: Consequences and their underlying mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 827-839. |
[10] | GUO Li, JIA Suosuo, LI Guiquan, LI Manlin. Lonely at the top? Exploring the multi-level double-edged sword effect of leader workplace loneliness [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 582-596. |
[11] | LI Qian, LI Chaofan, GONG Shiyang, ZHOU Qiwei, KE Yi. The effect of multicultural experiences on the capabilities and development of leaders [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(9): 1922-1943. |
[12] | LIU Songbo, CHENG Jinkai, WANG Xi. The double-edged sword of shared leadership in virtual teams: A perspective from adaptive structuration theory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(8): 1770-1784. |
[13] | GUO Yudong, OU Qiwen, DUAN Jinyun. Psychological and behavioral responses of leaders toward proactive behaviors from subordinates [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 1158-1167. |
[14] | LIN Xinqi, LUAN Yuxiang, ZHAO Kai, ZHAO Guolong. A meta-analysis of the relationship between leadership styles and employee creative performance: A self-determination perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(4): 781-801. |
[15] | LING Qian, ZHANG Zhengjie, QIU Xiaoyan. The negative effects of servant leadership and its buffer mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(4): 922-940. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||