前瞻记忆意图后效中执行错误的机制

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.0600

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

前瞻记忆意图后效是指已完成或取消的意图失活失败对当前认知任务造成的干扰。近期研究采用前瞻记忆任务范式探究意图后效的影响因素及认知机制。自发提取-抑制失败和预备性监控两种认知机制的分歧在于提取旧意图是否依赖注意资源的参与。脑成像研究也证实意图提取存在两条神经通路：自发提取通路和预备性监控提取通路。未来研究应探索兼容有意遗忘失败、旧意图再提取、抑制失败三者的研究范式以及降低执行错误的有效措施。

关键词: 意图后效, 执行错误, 认知机制, 注意资源, 神经机制

Abstract:

Aftereffects of completed intentions refer to participants continue retrieving intentions interfering with current cognitive tasks, after their failures in deactivating completed or cancelled intentions. Recent studies investigated the related factors and cognitive mechanisms in prospective memory task paradigm. Spontaneous retrieval and preparatory monitoring retrieval diverge in whether the retrieval process depends on attentional resources. Brain imaging research also showed that there are two neural pathways for intention retrieval. Further studies are necessary to explore effective approaches to reduce commission errors, and develop a new paradigm including three aspects of aftereffects of completed intentions, which are failures in intentional forgetting, retrieval of completed intentions and failures in inhibition.

Key words: aftereffects of completed intentions, commission errors, cognitive mechanisms, attentional resources, neural mechanisms

中图分类号:

B842

黄欢, 刘博, 周晨琛, 姬鸣. (2018). 前瞻记忆意图后效中执行错误的机制. 心理科学进展 , 26(9), 1600-1607.

Huan HUANG, Bo LIU, Chenchen ZHOU, Ming JI. (2018). Mechanisms of commission errors in aftereffects of completed intentions. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(9), 1600-1607.

参考文献

1	卢焕华, 王岩, 郭春彦 . ( 2010). 从ERP研究看前瞻记忆的神经基础和认知加工机制. 心理科学进展, 18( 3), 426-431.
2	卢家楣, 孙俊才, 刘伟 . ( 2008). 诱发负性情绪时人际情绪调节与个体情绪调节对前瞻记忆的影响. 心理学报, 40( 12), 1258-1265.
3	Anderson, F. T., & Einstein, G. O. ( 2017). The fate of completed intentions. Memory, 25( 4), 467-480.
4	Beck S. M., Ruge H., Walser M., & Goschke T. ( 2014). The functional neuroanatomy of spontaneous retrieval and strategic monitoring of delayed intentions. Neuropsychologia, 52, 37-50.
5	Bugg, J. M., & Scullin, M. K. ( 2013). Controlling intentions: The surprising ease of stopping after going relative to stopping after never having gone. Psychological Science, 24( 12), 2463-2471.
6	Bugg J. M., Scullin M. K., & McDaniel M. A. ( 2013). Strengthening encoding via implementation intention formation increases prospective memory commission errors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20( 3), 522-527.
7	Bugg J. M., Scullin M. K., & Rauvola R. S. ( 2016). Forgetting no-longer-relevant prospective memory intentions is (sometimes) harder with age but easier with forgetting practice. Psychology and Aging, 31( 4), 358-369.
8	Burgess P. W., Dumontheil I., & Gilbert S. J. ( 2007). The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11( 7), 290-298.
9	Burgess P. W., Gonen-Yaacovi G., & Volle E. ( 2011). Functional neuroimaging studies of prospective memory: What have we learnt so far? Neuropsychologia, 49( 8), 2246-2257.
10	Cohen A.-L., Dixon R. A., & Lindsay D. S. ( 2005). The intention interference effect and aging: Similar magnitude of effects for young and old adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19( 9), 1177-1197.
11	Cohen A.-L., Kantner J., Dixon R. A., & Lindsay D. S. ( 2011). The intention interference effect: The difficulty of ignoring what you intend to do. Experimental Psychology, 58( 6), 425-433.
12	Cona G., Bisiacchi P. S., Sartori G., & Scarpazza C. ( 2016). Effects of cue focality on the neural mechanisms of prospective memory: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Scientific Reports, 6, 25983.
13	Cona G., Scarpazza C., Sartori G., Moscovitch M., & Bisiacchi P. S. ( 2015). Neural bases of prospective memory: A meta-analysis and the "Attention to Delayed Intention" (AtoDI) model. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 52, 21-37.
14	Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. ( 2002). Control of goal- directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3( 3), 201-215.
15	Einstein G. O., McDaniel M. A., Thomas R., Mayfield S., Shank H., Morrisette N., & Breneiser J. ( 2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134( 3), 327-342.
16	Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. ( 2017). Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex, 86, 186-204.
17	Gollwitzer, P. M. ( 1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54( 7), 493-503.
18	Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. ( 1993). Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19( 5), 1211-1226.
19	Harris, L. M., & Cumming, S. R. ( 2003). An examination of the relationship between anxiety and performance on prospective and retrospective memory tasks. Australian Journal of Psychology, 55( 1), 51-55.
20	Leech, R., & Sharp, D. J. ( 2014). The role of the posterior cingulate cortex in cognition and disease. Brain, 137( 1), 12-32.
21	Lustig C., Hasher L., & Zacks R. T. ( 2007). Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a "new view". In D. S. Gorfein & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), The place of inhibition in cognition ( pp. 145-162). Washington: American Psychological Association.
22	Marsh R. L., Hicks J. L., & Bink M. L. ( 1998). Activation of completed, uncompleted, and partially completed intentions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24( 2), 350-361.
23	McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. ( 2011). The neuropsychology of prospective memory in normal aging: A componential approach. Neuropsychologia, 49( 8), 2147-2155.
24	McDaniel M. A., LaMontagne P., Beck S. M., Scullin M. K., & Braver T. S. ( 2013). Dissociable neural routes to successful prospective memory. Psychological Science, 24( 9), 1791-1800.
25	McDaniel, M. A., & Scullin, M. K. ( 2010). Implementation intention encoding does not automatize prospective memory responding. Memory & Cognition, 38( 2), 221-232.
26	Moscovitch, M. ( 1994). Memory and working with memory: Evaluation of a component process model and comparisons with other models. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems (pp. 269-310). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27	Mullet H. G., Scullin M. K., Hess T. J., Scullin R. B., Arnold K. M., & Einstein G. O. ( 2013). Prospective memory and aging: Evidence for preserved spontaneous retrieval with exact but not related cues. Psychology and Aging, 28( 4), 910-922.
28	Penningroth, S. L. ( 2011). When does the intention- superiority effect occur? Activation patterns before and after task completion, and moderating variables. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23( 1), 140-156.
29	Pink, J. E., & Dodson, C. S. ( 2013). Negative prospective memory: Remembering not to perform an action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20( 1), 184-190.
30	Schaper, P., & Grundgeiger, T. ( 2017). Commission errors in delay-execute prospective memory tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70( 8), 1423-1438.
31	Scullin, M. K., & Bugg, J. M. ( 2013). Failing to forget: Prospective memory commission errors can result from spontaneous retrieval and impaired executive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39( 3), 965-971.
32	Scullin M. K., Bugg J. M., & McDaniel M. A. ( 2012). Whoops, I did it again: Commission errors in prospective memory. Psychology and Aging, 27( 1), 46-53.
33	Scullin M. K., Bugg J. M., McDaniel M. A., & Einstein G. O. ( 2011). Prospective memory and aging: Preserved spontaneous retrieval, but impaired deactivation in older adults. Memory & Cognition, 39( 7), 1232-1240.
34	Scullin M. K., Einstein G. O., & McDaniel M. A. ( 2009). Evidence for spontaneous retrieval of suspended but not finished prospective memories. Memory & Cognition, 37( 4), 425-433.
35	Seeley W. W., Menon V., Schatzberg A. F., Keller J., Glover G. H., Kenna H., … Greicius M. D. ( 2007). Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. Journal of Neuroscience, 27( 9), 2349-2356.
36	Shenhav A., Botvinick M. M., & Cohen J. D. ( 2013). The Expected value of control: An integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron, 79( 2), 217-240.
37	Smith, R. E. ( 2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29( 3), 347-361.
38	Walser M., Fischer R., & Goschke T. ( 2012). The failure of deactivating intentions: Aftereffects of completed intentions in the repeated prospective memory cue paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38( 4), 1030-1044.
39	Walser M., Goschke T., & Fischer R. ( 2014). The difficulty of letting go: Moderators of the deactivation of completed intentions. Psychological Research, 78( 4), 574-583.
40	Walser M., Goschke T., Möschl M., & Fischer R. ( 2017). Intention deactivation: Effects of prospective memory task similarity on aftereffects of completed intentions. Psychological Research, 81( 5), 961-981.
41	Walser M., Plessow F., Goschke T., & Fischer R. ( 2014). The role of temporal delay and repeated prospective memory cue exposure on the deactivation of completed intentions. Psychological Research, 78( 4), 584-596.

[1]	王勇丽, 葛胜男, Lancy Lantin Huang, 万勤, 卢海丹. 言语想象的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(4): 608-621.
[2]	孔祥祯, 张凤翔, 蒲艺. 空间导航的脑网络基础和调控机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(3): 330-337.
[3]	张明霞, 李雨欣, 李瑾, 刘勋. 内外动机对青少年记忆的影响及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(1): 1-9.
[4]	王松雪, 程思, 蒋挺, 刘勋, 张明霞. 外在奖赏对陈述性记忆的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(1): 78-86.
[5]	邹迪, 李红, 王福顺. 唤醒定义探析及其认知神经生理基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(9): 2020-2033.
[6]	邓尧, 王梦梦, 饶恒毅. 风险决策研究中的仿真气球冒险任务[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(6): 1377-1392.
[7]	李亮, 李红. 人们为什么会羞怯：认知机制及神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(5): 1038-1049.
[8]	张航, 孟乐, 张积家. 为什么和声能诱发音乐情感?——音乐协和性的作用及其认知机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(4): 817-833.
[9]	武晓菲, 肖风, 罗劲. 创造性认知重评在情绪调节中的迁移效应及其神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3): 477-485.
[10]	张琳琳, 魏坤琳, 李晶. 儿童的人际运动同步[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3): 623-634.
[11]	章丽娜, 宣宾. 语言产生中词频效应老化的神经基础与时间进程[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(2): 333-342.
[12]	李何慧, 黄慧雅, 董琳, 罗跃嘉, 陶伍海. 发展性阅读障碍与小脑异常：小脑的功能和两者的因果关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(2): 343-353.
[13]	胡佳宝, 雷扬, 定险峰, 程晓荣, 范炤. 大众与个人审美品位的认知与神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(2): 354-364.
[14]	黄建平, 许婧娴, 宛小昂. 联想学习对消费行为的影响：基于产品搜索经验的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(11): 2414-2423.
[15]	陈群林, 丁珂. 发散思维的序列位置效应：创新想法动态产生机制的新视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(11): 2507-2517.