一种新决策模型——量子决策模型

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01365

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近10年以来, 一些学者基于量子理论研究思想与方法探索出了量子决策模型。由于该模型独特的理论结构, 它可被用于解释传统决策理论所难以解释的问题, 尤其是个体在不确定情况下的决策行为。该模型解释了诸如分离效应、分类决策的干涉效应以及合取谬误等传统决策模型很难解释的问题, 研究者已经证实其中一种称为量子问题等式的决策模型可以精确地预测决策中的顺序效应。作为一个有助于分析心理学中决策现象的新研究领域, 量子决策模型具有深入研究的理论意义和实践意义。

关键词: 量子, 决策, 模型, 概率

Abstract:

During the recent decade, quantum decision-making models were established based on the mathematical structure and methodologies of quantum mechanics. Owing to its unique theoretical structure, the quantum decision-making models can be applied to explain problems that violate the classical decision models, especially for judgments under uncertainty and decisions under conflicts. Quantum decision-making models have been used to explain phenomena such as disjunction effect, conjunction fallacy and interference of categorization on decision making which are difficult to account for with classical decision models. A model called quantum question equality has been tested for its accurate prediction of order effects. Being a new research field contributing to analysis of decision making, quantum decision-making models worth further investigations both in theoretical and applicative levels.

Key words: quantum, decision making, model, probability

中图分类号:

B841.2

辛潇洋, 徐晨虹, 陈宏玉, 李瑛. (2018). 一种新决策模型——量子决策模型. 心理科学进展 , 26(8), 1365-1373.

XIN Xiaoyang, XU Chenhong, CHEN Hongyu, LI Ying. (2018). Quantum models for decision making. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(8), 1365-1373.

图/表 6

图1 薛定谔的猫

图2 双缝衍射路径简图

表1 分类-决策实验的部分实验结果(资料来源：Busemeyer & Bruza, 2012)

C-then-D					D-alone
p (G)	p (A\|G)	p (B)	p (A\|B)	p_T(A)	p (A)
0.17	0.41	0.83	0.63	0.59	0.69

图3 分类决策实验的路径简图

图4 Linda问题的几何投影解释图(注：彩图见电子版)

图5 量子问题等式统计结果图(资料来源：Busemeyer & Wang, 2015)

参考文献 47

1	顾樵 . ( 2014). 量子力学Ⅰ. 北京: 科学出版社.
2	李红, 谢松法 . ( 2013). 复变函数与积分变换 (第4版). 北京: 高等教育出版社.
3	刘程浩, 徐富明, 王伟, 李燕, 史燕伟 . ( 2015). 概率判断中的合取谬误. 心理科学进展, 23( 6), 967-978. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.00967 URL
4	罗俊明 . ( 2002). 概率论与数理统计. 郑州: 郑州大学出版社.
5	史荣昌, 魏丰 . ( 2010). 矩阵分析 (第3版). 北京: 北京理工大学出版社.
6	苏汝铿 . ( 2002). 量子力学 (第2版). 北京: 高等教育出版社.
7	孙炯, 王万义, 赫建文 . ( 2010). 泛函分析. 北京: 高等教育出版社.
8	汪祚军, 李纾 . ( 2008). 行为决策中出现的分离效应. 心理科学进展, 16( 4), 513-517.
9	曾谨言 . ( 2014). 量子力学教程 (第3版). 北京: 科学出版社.
10	Aerts, D . ( 2009). Quantum structure in cognition. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53( 5), 314-348. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2009.04.005 URL
11	Aerts, D., & Gabora, L . ( 2005). A theory of concepts and their combinations II: A Hilbert space representation. Kybernetes, 34( 1-2), 192-221. doi: 10.1108/03684920510575807 URL
12	Aerts D., Gabora L., & Sozzo S . ( 2013). Concepts and their dynamics: A quantum-theoretic modeling of human thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5( 4), 737-772. doi: 10.1111/tops.12042 URL pmid: 24039114
13	Aerts D., Sozzo S., & Veloz T . ( 2016). New fundamental evidence of non-classical structure in the combination of natural concepts. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 374(2058), 20150095.
14	Artemenkov, S. L . ( 2006). Kansei versus extensional reasoning: The scientific illusion of the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Kansei ( pp. 8-11). Fukuoka, Japan.
15	Asano M., Basieva I., Khrennikov A., Ohya M., & Tanaka Y . ( 2012). Quantum-like generalization of the Bayesian updating scheme for objective and subjective mental uncertainties. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56( 3), 166-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2012.02.003 URL
16	Atmanspacher, H., & Filk, T. . ( 2010). A proposed test of temporal nonlocality in bistable perception. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54( 3), 314-321. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2009.12.001 URL
17	Bagassi, M., & Macchi, L . ( 2006). Pragmatic approach to decision making under uncertainty: The case of the disjunction effect. Thinking & Reasoning, 12( 3), 329-350. doi: 10.1080/13546780500375663 URL
18	Baron, J . ( 1988). Thinking and deciding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19	Blutner R., Pothos E. M., & Bruza P . ( 2013). A quantum probability perspective on borderline vagueness. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5( 4), 711-736. doi: 10.1111/tops.12041 URL pmid: 24039093
20	Brainerd C. J., Wang Z., & Reyna V. F . ( 2013). Superposition of episodic memories: Overdistribution and quantum models. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5( 4), 773-799. doi: 10.1111/tops.12039 URL pmid: 24027175
21	Bruza P., Kitto K., Nelson D., & McEvoy C . ( 2009). Is there something quantum-like about the human mental lexicon? Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53( 5), 363-377.
22	Bruza P. D., Wang Z., & Busemeyer J. R . ( 2015). Quantum cognition: A new theoretical approach to psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19( 7), 383-393. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.05.001 URL pmid: 26058709
23	Busemeyer J. R., & Bruza, P. D. .( 2012) . Quantum models of cognition and decision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24	Busemeyer, J. R., & Wang, Z. . ( 2015). What is quantum cognition, and how is it applied to psychology? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24( 3), 163-169. doi: 10.1177/0963721414568663 URL
25	Busemeyer J. R., Wang Z., Khrennikov A., & Basieva I . ( 2014). Applying quantum principles to psychology. Physica Scripta, 2014, 014007. doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/2014/T163/014007 URL
26	Busemeyer J. R., Wang Z., & Lambert-Mogiliansky A . ( 2009). Empirical comparison of Markov and quantum models of decision making. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53( 5), 423-433. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2009.03.002 URL
27	Busemeyer J. R., Wang Z., & Townsend J. T . ( 2006). Quantum dynamics of human decision-making. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50( 3), 220-241. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2006.01.003 URL
28	Chater N., Tenenbaum J. B., & Yuille A . ( 2006). Probabilistic models of cognition: Conceptual foundations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10( 7), 287-291. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.007 URL pmid: 16807064
29	De Barros, J. A., & Suppes, P . ( 2009). Quantum mechanics, interference, and the brain. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53( 5), 306-313. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2009.03.005 URL
30	Gilboa, I . ( 2009). Theory of decision under uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31	Lewinski, P . ( 2015). Commentary: Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1832.
32	Li S., Jiang C. M., Dunn J. C., & Wang Z. J . ( 2012). A test of “reason-based” and “reluctance-to-think” accounts of the disjunction effect. Information Sciences, 184( 1), 166-175 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2011.09.002 URL
33	Li, S., & Taplin, J . ( 2002). Examining whether there is a disjunction effect in prisoner's dilemma games. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 44( 1), 25-46.
34	Moore, D. W . ( 2002). Measuring new types of question-order effects: Additive and subtractive. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66( 1), 80-91. doi: 10.1086/338631 URL
35	Pothos, E. M., & Busemeyer, J. R . ( 2009). A quantum probability explanation for violations of 'rational' decision theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276( 1665), 2171-2178. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0121 URL pmid: 19324743
36	Pothos E. M., Busemeyer J. R., & Trueblood J. S . ( 2013). A quantum geometric model of similarity. Psychological Review, 120( 3), 679-696. doi: 10.1037/a0033142 URL pmid: 23915087
37	Savage L J . ( 1954). The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.
38	Sun Y., Li S., & Li Y. M . ( 2008). Reexamining the role of the description of problem texts in the disjunction effect. The Journal of Psychology, 142( 3), 261-265. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.142.3.261-266 URL pmid: 18589936
39	Tenenbaum J. B., Griffiths T. L., & Kemp C . ( 2006). Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10( 7), 309-318. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.009 URL pmid: 16797219
40	Townsend J. T., Smith J. S., Wenger M. J., & Silva K. M . ( 2000). Exploring the relations between categorization and decision making with regard to realistic face stimuli. Pragmatics & Cognition, 8( 1), 83-106.
41	Trueblood, J. S., & Busemeyer, J. R . ( 2012). A quantum probability model of causal reasoning. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 138. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00138 URL pmid: 3350941
42	Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D . ( 1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185( 4157), 1124-1131. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 URL pmid: 17835457
43	Tversky, A., & Shafir, E . ( 1992). The disjunction effect in choice under uncertainty. Psychological Science, 3( 5), 305-309. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00678.x URL
44	Wang, Z., & Busemeyer, J. R . ( 2013). A quantum question order model supported by empirical tests of an A priori and precise prediction. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5, 689-710.
45	Wang, Z., & Busemeyer, J. R . ( 2016). Interference effects of categorization on decision making. Cognition, 150, 133-149. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.019 URL pmid: 26896726
46	Wang Z. J., Li S., & Jiang C. M . ( 2012). Emotional response in a disjunction condition. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33( 1), 71-78.
47	Yearsley, J. M., & Busemeyer, J. R . ( 2016). Quantum cognition and decision theories: A tutorial. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 74, 99-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2015.11.005 URL

[1]	张凯丽, 郑红, 汪凤炎. “一个序曲”与“两个阶段”：智慧心理学近50年研究历程的写照[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(5): 721-735.
[2]	方俊燕, 温忠麟. 追踪研究中的内生性问题：来源与应对[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(4): 507-518.
[3]	郭理, 加锁锁, 李圭泉, 李蔓林. 高处不胜寒?领导工作场所孤独感的多层次双刃剑效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(4): 582-596.
[4]	余婕, 陈有国. 时空干扰效应：基于贝叶斯模型的解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(4): 597-607.
[5]	冯廷勇, 张碧滢. 拖延行为的认知神经模型及干预[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(3): 350-360.
[6]	孙卉, 徐洁. 秒回?信息通讯技术时代的职场通讯压力[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(3): 467-479.
[7]	杨智超, 王艇. 消费决策中的零：零价格效应和零比较效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(3): 492-506.
[8]	万金, 周雯珺, 周海明, 李平平, 时勘. 心理脱离对工作投入的影响：促进还是抑制?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(2): 209-222.
[9]	谢才凤, 邬家骅, 许丽颖, 喻丰, 张语嫣, 谢莹莹. 算法决策趋避的过程动机理论[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(1): 60-77.
[10]	翟宏堃, 李强, 魏晓薇. 结构方程模型统计检验力分析：原理与方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(9): 2117-2130.
[11]	温忠麟, 方杰, 谢晋艳, 欧阳劲樱. 国内中介效应的方法学研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(8): 1692-1702.
[12]	王阳, 温忠麟, 李伟, 方杰. 新世纪20年国内结构方程模型方法研究与模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(8): 1715-1733.
[13]	林浇敏, 李爱梅, 周雅然, 何军红, 周蕾. 眼动操纵技术在决策研究中的应用前景：改变决策行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(8): 1794-1803.
[14]	杜棠艳, 胡小勇, 杨静, 李兰玉, 王甜甜. 低社会经济地位与跨期决策：威胁视角下的心理转变机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(8): 1894-1904.
[15]	杨琪, 蒋晓鸣, 周晓林. 语言理解中的预设加工[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(7): 1511-1523.