肢体识别的倒置效应

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00027

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

肢体识别加工的研究常常以倒置肢体作为对象.肢体倒置效应是指, 与正立肢体相比, 人们识别倒置肢体的时间更长,正确率更低.该现象为探究肢体识别提供了新的思路.近些年, 研究者们使用多种技术考察了这一效应及肢体构形加工的特异机制与神经基础.其中, 头部信息在肢体倒置效应中的作用引起了一些研究者的争论.此外, 构形加工理论和构形加工连续量理论都肯定了构形加工在该效应产生中的作用, 但对于构形加工所包含的子成分还存在一些分歧.未来需要进一步拓展该领域的特殊群体研究, 揭示头部信息的具体作用, 完善相关理论解释以及探索更具有生态效度的肢体倒置效应.

关键词: 肢体倒置效应, 头部信息, 构形加工理论, 构形加工连续量理论

Abstract:

The studies for body recognition processing often focus on inverted body. And the body inversion effect refers to the fact that the reaction time to identify the inverted body is longer and the correct rate is lower than that to the upright body. Recently, researchers have used a variety of techniques to examine the effect and its configural processing mechanism, in which there are still controversy about the role of head information. In addition, now available body inversion effect mainly concentrated on the configural processing theory and the configural processing continuum theory, however there are still some discrepancies between the two theories in terms of the subcomponents involved in the configural processing. Further researches, with more special populations involved, can focus on the improvements of relevant theories and the specific role of head information, through using materials of high ecological validity.

Key words: body inversion effect, head information, configural processing theory, configural processing continuum theory

中图分类号:

B842

张珂烨, 张明明, 刘田田, 罗文波, 何蔚祺. (2019). 肢体识别的倒置效应. 心理科学进展 , 27(1), 27-36.

ZHANG Keye, ZHANG Mingming, LIU Tiantian, LUO Wenbo, HE Weiqi. (2019). The inversion effect of body recognition. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(1), 27-36.

参考文献 56

1	陈丽, 李伟霞, 张烨, 张庆林 . (2015). 躯体知觉的认知神经机制. 心理科学,38(1), 85-92.
2	范聪, 陈顺森, 张灵聪, 罗文波 . (2014). 身体表情加工的神经机制. 心理学进展, 4(3), 506-514.
3	陶维东, 孙弘进, 张旭东, 郑剑虹 . (2011). 非面孔物体倒置效应形成过程的认知神经机制. 心理科学进展,19(8), 1104-1114. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2011.01104 URL
4	汪海玲, 傅世敏 . (2011). 面孔倒置效应的研究与理论述评. 心理科学进展,19(11), 1588-1594. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2011.01588 URL
5	汪亚珉, 黄雅梅 . (2011). 面孔识别中的构形加工与特征加工. 心理科学进展,19(8), 1126-1137. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2011.01126 URL
6	Arizpe J. M., Mckean D. L., Tsao J. W ., & Chan , A. W. Y. (2017). Where you look matters for body perception: Preferred gaze location contributes to the body inversion effect. PLoS ONE, 12(1), e0169148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169148 URL pmid: 5234795
7	Bentin S., Allison T., Puce A., Perez E., & Mccarthy G . (2009). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(6), 551-65.
8	Brandman T., & Yovel G. (2010). The body inversion effect is mediated by face-selective, not body-selective, mechanisms. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(31), 10534-10540. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0911-10.2010 URL pmid: 20685996
9	Brandman T., & Yovel G. (2016). Bodies are represented as wholes rather than their sum of parts in the occipital- emporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 26(2), 530-543. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu205 URL pmid: 25217470
10	Cabeza R., & Kato T. (2000). Features are also important: Contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition. Psychological Science, 11(5), 429-433. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00283 URL pmid: 11228917
11	Cave C.B., &Kosslyn S.M . (1993). The role of parts and spatial relations in object identification. Perception, 22(2), 229-248.
12	Chang D. H.F., &Troje N.F . (2009). Acceleration carries the local inversion effect in biological motion perception. Journal of Vision, 9(1), 1-17. doi: 10.1167/9.1.19 URL pmid: 19271889
13	Cleary L., Looney K., Brady N., & Fitzgerald M . (2014). Inversion effects in the perception of the moving human form: A comparison of adolescents with autism spectrum disorder and typically developing adolescents. Autism, 18(8), 943-952. doi: 10.1177/1362361313499455 URL pmid: 24126867
14	de Gelder B. (2016). Why bodies? In B. de Gelder (Eds.), Emotions and the body (pp. 1-22) . New York, US: Oxford University Press.
15	de Gelder B., Van den Stock J., Meeren H. K. M., Sinke C. B. A., Kret M. E., & Tamietto M . (2010). Standing up for the body. Recent progress in uncovering the networks involved in the perception of bodies and bodily expressions. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(4), 513-27. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.10.008 URL pmid: 19857515
16	Gauthier I., &Tarr M.J . (1997). Becoming a "Greeble" expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research, 37(12), 1673-1682.
17	Gauthier I., Williams P., Tarr M. J., & Tanaka J . (1998). Training 'greeble' experts: A framework for studying expert object recognition processes. Vision Research, 38(15-16), 2401-2428.
18	Le Grand R. L., Mondloch C. J., Maurer D., & Brent H. P . (2001). Neuroperception: Early visual experience and face processing. Nature, 410(6831), 890.
19	Groves K., Kennett S., & Gillmeister H . (2017). Evidence for ERP biomarkers of eating disorder symptoms in women. Biological Psychology, 123, 205-219. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.12.016 URL pmid: 28057515
20	Haig N.D . (2013). The effect of feature displacement on face recognition. Perception, 42(11), 1158-1165. doi: 10.1068/p130505 URL pmid: 6535975
21	Harris A., Vyas D. B., & Reed C. L . (2016). Holistic processing for bodies and body parts: New evidence from stereoscopic depth manipulations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(5), 1513-1519. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1027-4 URL pmid: 27001251
22	Itier R.J., &Taylor M.J . (2004 a). Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs. NeuroImage, 21(4), 1518-1532. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.016 URL pmid: 15050576
23	Itier R.J., &Taylor M.J . (2004 b). Face recognition memory and configural processing: A developmental ERP study using upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(3), 487-502.
24	Itier R.J., &Taylor M.J . (2004 c). N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cerebral Cortex, 14(2), 132-142. doi: 10.1021/ed085p221 URL pmid: 14704210
25	Kanwisher N. . (2010). Functional specificity in the human brain: A window into the functional architecture of the mind. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(25), 11163-11170. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005062107 URL pmid: 20484679
26	Lefaucheur J. P., André-Obadia N., Antal A., Ayache S. S., Baeken C., Benninger D. H., ... Garcia-Larrea L . (2014). Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clinical Neurophysiology, 125(11), 2150-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021 URL pmid: 25034472
27	Luck S.J . (2014). Overview of common ERP components. In S. J. Luck (Eds.), An introduction to the event-related potential technique(2 ed., pp. 71-117). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT press.
28	Maurer D., Le Grand R., & Mondloch C. J . (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 255-260. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01903-4 URL pmid: 12039607
29	Minnebusch D. A., Suchan B., & Daum I . (2009). Losing your head: Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of body inversion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(5), 865-874. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21074 URL pmid: 1870258142
30	Mohamed T. N., Neumann M. F., & Schweinberger S. R . (2011). Combined effects of attention and inversion on event-related potentials to human bodies and faces. Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(3-4), 138-146. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2011.597848 URL pmid: 24168528
31	Papeo L., Stein T., & Soto-Faraco S . (2017). The two-body inversion effect. Psychological Science, 28(3), 369-379. doi: 10.1177/0956797616685769 URL pmid: 28140764
32	Peelen M.V., &Downing P.E . (2007). The neural basis of visual body perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(8), 636-648. doi: 10.1038/nrn2195 URL pmid: 17643089
33	Reed C. L., Beall P. M., Stone V. E., Kopelioff L., Pulham D. J., & Hepburn S. L . (2007). Brief report: Perception of body posture-What individuals with autism spectrum disorder might be missing. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(8), 1576-1584. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0220-0 URL pmid: 17029019
34	Reed C. L., Stone V. E., Bozova S., & Tanaka J . (2003). The body-inversion effect. Psychological Science, 14(4), 302-308.
35	Reed C. L., Stone V. E., Grubb J. D., & Mcgoldrick J. E . (2006). Turning configural processing upside down: Part and whole body postures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 73-87. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.73 URL pmid: 16478327
36	Rezlescu C., Susilo T., Wilmer J. B., & Caramazza A . (2017). The inversion, part-whole, and composite effects reflect distinct perceptual mechanisms with varied relationships to face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,43(12), 1961-1973. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000400 URL pmid: 28406690
37	Righart R., & de Gelder B. (2007). Impaired face and body perception in developmental prosopagnosia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(43), 17234-17238. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707753104 URL pmid: 17942679
38	Rivolta D., Lawson R. P., & Palermo R . (2016). More than just a problem with faces: Altered body perception in a group of congenital prosopagnosics. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(2), 276-286. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1174277 URL pmid: 27049475
39	Robbins R.A., & Coltheart M. (2012). The effects of inversion and familiarity on face versus body cues to person recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(5), 1098-1104. doi: 10.1037/a0028584 URL pmid: 22642217
40	Rossion B., & Jacques C. (2008). Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170. NeuroImage, 39(4), 1959-1979. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.011 URL pmid: 18055223
41	Shao H. Y., Weng X. C., & He S . (2017). Functional organization of the face-sensitive areas in human occipital-temporal cortex. NeuroImage, 157, 129-143. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.061 URL pmid: 28572061
42	Soria Bauser, D., & Suchan B. (2013). Behavioral and electrophysiological correlates of intact and scrambled body perception. Clinical Neurophysiology, 124(4), 686-696. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.09.030 URL pmid: 23375380
43	Soria B.D., & Suchan B. (2015). Is the whole the sum of its parts? Configural processing of headless bodies in the right fusiform gyrus. Behavioural Brain Research, 281, 102-110. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.015 URL pmid: 25510195
44	Stein T., Sterzer P., & Peelen M. V . (2012). Privileged detection of conspecifics: Evidence from inversion effects during continuous flash suppression. Cognition, 125(1), 64-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.005 URL pmid: 22776239
45	Stekelenburg J.J., & de Gelder B. (2004). The neural correlates of perceiving human bodies: An ERP study on the body-inversion effect. Neuroreport, 15(5), 777-780. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200404090-00007 URL pmid: 15073513
46	Susilo T., Yovel G., Barton J. J. S., & Duchaine B . (2013). Face perception is category-specific: Evidence from normal body perception in acquired prosopagnosia. Cognition, 129(1), 88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.004 URL pmid: 23856076
47	Tanaka J.W., &Farah M.J . (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 46(2), 225-245. doi: 10.1080/14640749308401045 URL pmid: 8316637
48	Tao W.D., &Sun H.J . (2013). Configural processing in body posture recognition: An eye-tracking study. Neuroreport, 24(16), 903-910. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000017 URL pmid: 24071707
49	Tao W. D., Zeng W. X., & Sun H. J . (2014). Behavioral and electrophysiological measures of the body inversion effect: The contribution of the limb configurations. Neuroreport, 25(14), 1099-1108. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000234 URL pmid: 25076068
50	Taylor J. C., Wiggett A. J., & Downing P. E . (2007). Functional MRI analysis of body and body part representations in the extrastriate and fusiform body areas. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98(3), 1626-1633. doi: 10.1152/jn.00012.2007 URL pmid: 17596425
51	Urgesi C., Calvo-Merino B., Haggard P., & Aglioti S. M . (2007). Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals two cortical pathways for visual body processing. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(30), 8023-8030. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0789-07.2007 URL pmid: 17652592
52	Urgesi C., Fornasari L., Canalaz F., Perini L., Cremaschi S., Faleschini L., .. Fabbro F . (2014). Impaired configural body processing in anorexia nervosa: Evidence from the body inversion effect. British Journal of Psychology, 105(4), 486-508. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12057 URL pmid: 24206365
53	Willems S., Vrancken L., Germeys F., & Verfaillie K . (2014). Holistic processing of human body postures: Evidence from the composite effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(7), 618. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00618 URL pmid: 24999337
54	Yin R.K . (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 141-145. doi: 10.1037/h0027474 URL
55	Yovel G., & Kanwisher N. (2005). The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect. Current Biology, 15(24), 2256-2262.
56	Yovel G., Pelc T., & Lubetzky I . (2010). It's all in your head: Why is the body inversion effect abolished for headless bodies? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(3), 759-767. doi: 10.1037/a0017451 URL pmid: 20515202

[1]	叶舒琪, 尹俊婷, 李招贤, 罗俊龙. 情绪对直觉与分析加工的影响机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(5): 736-746.
[2]	李亚丹, 杜颖, 谢聪, 刘春宇, 杨毅隆, 李阳萍, 邱江. 语义距离与创造性思维关系的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(4): 519-534.
[3]	余婕, 陈有国. 时空干扰效应：基于贝叶斯模型的解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(4): 597-607.
[4]	王勇丽, 葛胜男, Lancy Lantin Huang, 万勤, 卢海丹. 言语想象的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(4): 608-621.
[5]	杨庆, 李亚琴. 不确定是坏的么?不确定状态中的错误加工特点及其解释机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(3): 338-349.
[6]	王旭东, 何雅吉, 范会勇, 罗扬眉, 陈煦海. 人际愤怒的利与弊：来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(3): 386-401.
[7]	李清扬, 尹俊婷, 罗俊龙. 才思泉涌“举步”间：体育运动对创造性思维的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(3): 455-466.
[8]	陈子炜, 付迪, 刘勋. 错认总比错过好——面孔视错觉的发生机制及其应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(2): 240-255.
[9]	王松雪, 程思, 蒋挺, 刘勋, 张明霞. 外在奖赏对陈述性记忆的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(1): 78-86.
[10]	谢才凤, 邬家骅, 许丽颖, 喻丰, 张语嫣, 谢莹莹. 算法决策趋避的过程动机理论[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(1): 60-77.
[11]	叶伟豪于美琪张利会高琪傅明珠卢家楣. 精准的意义：负性情绪粒度的作用机制与干预[J]. 心理科学进展, 0, (): 0-0.
[12]	朱传林, 刘电芝, 罗文波. 情绪体验影响估算策略运用的认知与脑机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(12): 2639-2649.
[13]	史汉文, 李雨桐, 隋雪. 情绪词类型效应：区分情绪标签词和情绪负载词的行为和神经活动证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(12): 2696-2707.
[14]	陈玉田, 陈睿, 李鹏. 工作记忆中“组块”概念的演化及理论模型[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(12): 2708-2717.
[15]	时慧颖, 汤洁, 刘萍萍. 眼睛效应不稳定与感知规范：一个新视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(12): 2718-2734.