[1] 柴方圆, 喻丰, 彭凯平. (2016). 审美愉悦与加工流畅性.心理学探新, 36(2), 101-106. [2] 何先友, 陈雅珏, 杨丹妮, 何德娴. (2019). 流畅性对审美鉴赏的影响——从加工流畅性模型到审美愉悦与兴趣模型.华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), (3), 71-76. [3] 唐国尧, 徐祥运. (2022). 审美知觉研究的新视域: 预测加工理论探析.科学技术哲学研究, 39(5), 27-32. [4] Albrecht, S., & Carbon, C. C. (2014). The fluency amplification model: Fluent stimuli show more intense but not evidently more positive evaluations.Acta Psychologica, 148, 195-203. [5] Armstrong, T., & Detweiler-Bedell, B. (2008). Beauty as an emotion: The exhilarating prospect of mastering a challenging world.Review of General Psychology, 12(4), 305-329. [6] Brielmann, A. A., & Dayan, P. (2022). A computational model of aesthetic value.Psychological Review, 129(6), 1319-1337. [7] Brouillet, D., & Friston, K. (2023). Relative fluency (unfelt vs felt) in active inference.Consciousness and Cognition, 115, 103579-103579. [8] Bullot, N. J., & Reber, R. (2013). The artful mind meets art history: Toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(2), 123-137. [9] Carr E. W., Brady T. F., & Winkielman P. (2017). Are you smiling, or have I seen you before? Familiarity makes faces look happier.Psychological Science, 28(8), 1087-1102. [10] Carr E. W., Huber D. E., Pecher D., Zeelenberg R., Halberstadt J., & Winkielman P. (2017). The ugliness-in- averageness effect: Tempering the warm glow of familiarity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(6), 787-812. [11] Carr E. W., Rotteveel M., & Winkielman P. (2016). Easy moves: Perceptual fluency facilitates approach-related action.Emotion, 16(4), 540-552. [12] Erle, T. M., & Topolinski, S. (2018). Disillusionment: How expectations shape the enjoyment of early perceptual processes.Experimental Psychology, 65(6), 332-344. [13] Forster, M. (2022). Processing fluency. In M. Nadal & O. Vartanian (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of empirical aesthetics (pp. 430-446). Oxford University Press. [14] Frascaroli J., Leder H., Brattico E., & Van de Cruys, S. (2024). Aesthetics and predictive processing: Grounds and prospects of a fruitful encounter.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 379(1895), 20220410. [15] Friston, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360(1456), 815-836. [16] Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory?Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127-138. [17] Friston K. J., Lin M., Frith C. D., Pezzulo G., Hobson J. A., & Ondobaka S. (2017). Active inference, curiosity and insight.Neural Computation, 29(10), 2633-2683. [18] Furnham, A., & Bunyan, M. (1988). Personality and art preferences.European Journal of Personality, 2(1), 67-74. [19] Gershman, S. J. (2019). What does the free energy principle tell us about the brain?Neurons, Behavior, Data Analysis, and Theory, 2(3), 1-12. [20] Graf, L. K. M., & Landwehr, J. R. (2015). A dual-process perspective on fluency-based aesthetics: The Pleasure- Interest Model of Aesthetic Liking.Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(4), 395-410. [21] Graf, L. K. M., & Landwehr, J. R. (2017). Aesthetic pleasure versus aesthetic interest: The two routes to aesthetic liking.Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 15. [22] Halberstadt, J., & Winkielman, P. (2014). Easy on the eyes, or hard to categorize: Classification difficulty decreases the appeal of facial blends.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 175-183. [23] Hansen, J., & Topolinski, S. (2011). An exploratory mindset reduces preference for prototypes and increases preference for novel exemplars.Cognition & Emotion, 25(4), 709-716. [24] Hansen J.,& Wänke, M. (2013). Fluency in context: Discrepancy makes processing experiences informative In C Unkelbach & R Greifender (Eds), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behaviour (pp 70-84) Psychology Press Discrepancy makes processing experiences informative. In C. Unkelbach & R. Greifender (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behaviour (pp. 70-84). Psychology Press. [25] Heilbron M., Armeni K., Schoffelen J.-M., Hagoort P., & de Lange, F. P. (2022). A hierarchy of linguistic predictions during natural language comprehension.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(32), e2201968119. [26] Herzog S. M.,& Hertwig, R. (2013). The ecological validity of fluency. In C. Unkelbach & R. Greifender (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behaviour (pp. 190-219). Psychology Press. [27] Hesp C., Smith R., Parr T., Allen M., Friston K. J., & Ramstead, M. J. D. (2021). Deeply felt affect: The emergence of valence in deep active inference.Neural Computation, 33(2), 398-446. [28] Jacoby L. L., Kelley C., M., & Dywan J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H. L. Roediger & F. I. M. Craik (Eds), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving(pp. 391-422). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. [29] Jakesch, M., & Carbon, C.-C. (2012). The mere exposure effect in the domain of haptics.PLoS ONE, 7(2), e31215. [30] Jakesch M., Leder H., & Forster M. (2013). Image ambiguity and fluency.PLoS ONE, 8(9), e74084. [31] Jiang Y., Marcowski P., Ryazanov A., & Winkielman P. (2023). People conform to social norms when gambling with lives or money.Scientific Reports, 13(1), 853. [32] Kaminska O. K., Magnuski M., Olszanowski M., Gola M., Brzezicka A., & Winkielman P. (2020). Ambiguous at the second sight: Mixed facial expressions trigger late electrophysiological responses linked to lower social impressions.Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 20(2), 441-454. [33] Kaube H., Eiserbeck A., & Rahman R. A. (2023). Separating art from the artist: The effect of negative affective knowledge on ERPs and aesthetic experience.PLOS ONE, 18(1), e0281082. [34] Kruglanski, A. W. (2023). Uncertain: How to turn your biggest fear into your greatest power. Penguin. [35] Kruglanski A. W., Jasko K., & Friston K. (2020). All thinking is “wishful” thinking.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(6), 413-424. [36] Kruglanski A. W., Jasko K., Milyavsky M., Chernikova M., Webber D., Pierro A., & di Santo D. (2018). Cognitive consistency theory in social psychology: A paradigm reconsidered.Psychological Inquiry, 29(2), 45-59. [37] Kukkonen, K. (2024). Designs on consciousness: Literature and predictive processing.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 379(1895), 20220423. [38] Leder H., Belke B., Oeberst A., & Augustin D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments.British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489-508. [39] Leder, H., & Nadal, M. (2014). Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: The aesthetic episode-developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics.British Journal of Psychology, 105(4), 443-464. [40] Mantegna F., Hintz F., Ostarek M., Alday P. M., & Huettig F. (2019). Distinguishing integration and prediction accounts of ERP N400 modulations in language processing through experimental design.Neuropsychologia, 134, 107199. [41] Mayer, S., & Landwehr, J. R. (2018). Quantifying visual aesthetics based on processing fluency theory: Four algorithmic measures for antecedents of aesthetic preferences.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(4), 399-431. [42] Menninghaus W., Wagner V., Wassiliwizky E., Schindler I., Hanich J., Jacobsen T., & Koelsch S. (2019). What are aesthetic emotions?Psychological Review, 126(2), 171-195. [43] Montoya R. M., Horton R. S., Vevea J. L., Citkowicz M., & Lauber E. A. (2017). A re-examination of the mere exposure effect: The influence of repeated exposure on recognition, familiarity, and liking.Psychological Bulletin, 143(5), 459-498. [44] Muth, C., & Carbon, C.-C. (2024). Predicting instabilities: An embodied perspective on unstable experiences with art and design.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 379(1895), 20220416. [45] Nadal, M., & Chatterjee, A. (2018). Neuroaesthetics and art’s diversity and universality.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 10(3), e1487. [46] Nieuwland M. S., Barr D. J., Bartolozzi F., Busch-Moreno S., Darley E., Donaldson D. I., … Wolfsthurn, S. V. G. Z. (2020). Dissociable effects of prediction and integration during language comprehension: Evidence from a large- scale study using brain potentials.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375(1791), 20180522. [47] Nook, E. C., & Zaki, J. (2015). Social norms shift behavioral and neural responses to foods.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(7), 1412-1426. [48] Owen H. E., Halberstadt J., Carr E. W., & Winkielman P. (2016). Johnny Depp, reconsidered: How category-relative processing fluency determines the appeal of gender ambiguity.PLOS ONE, 11(2), e0146328. [49] Pocheptsova A., Labroo A. A., & Dhar R. (2010). Making products feel special: When metacognitive difficulty enhances evaluation.Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1059-1069. [50] Reber R., Schwarz N., & Winkielman P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364-382. [51] Rosenbaum, J. E., & Johnson, B. K. (2016). Who’s afraid of spoilers? Need for cognition, need for affect, and narrative selection and enjoyment.Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(3), 273-289. [52] Ryali C. K., Goffin S., Winkielman P., & Yu A. J. (2020). From likely to likable: The role of statistical typicality in human social assessment of faces.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(47), 29371-29380. [53] Schwarz N., Jalbert M., Noah T., & Zhang L. (2021). Metacognitive experiences as information: Processing fluency in consumer judgment and decision making.Consumer Psychology Review, 4(1), 4-25. [54] Siev, J. J., & Teeny, J. D. (2024). Personal misconduct elicits harsher professional consequences for artists (vs. scientists): A moral-decoupling process.Psychological Science, 35(1), 82-92. [55] Silvia P. J.(2012). Human emotions and aesthetic experience: An overview of empirical aesthetics. In A. Shimamura & S. E. Palmer (Eds.), Aesthetic science: Connecting minds, brains, and experience (pp. 250-275). Oxford University Press. [56] Unkelbach, C., & Greifender, R. (2013). The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behaviour. Taylor and Francis. [57] Van de Cruys S., Bervoets J., & Moors A. (2022). Preferences need inferences. In M. Nadal & M. Skov (Eds), The Routledge international handbook of neuroaesthetics(pp. 475-506). Routledge. [58] Van de Cruys S., Frascaroli J., & Friston K. (2024). Order and change in art: Towards an active inference account of aesthetic experience.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 379(1895), 20220411. [59] Van de Cruys, S., & Wagemans, J. (2011). Putting reward in art: A tentative prediction error account of visual art.I-Perception, 2(9), 1035-1062. [60] Vogel T., Ingendahl M., & Winkielman P. (2021). The architecture of prototype preferences: Typicality, fluency, and valence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(1), 187-194. [61] Wänke, M., & Hansen, J. (2015). Relative processing fluency.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 195-199. [62] Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(6), 1235-1253. [63] Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (1998). Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don’t? A discrepancy- attribution account of feelings of familiarity.Acta Psychologica, 98(2-3), 141-165. [64] Wiersema D. V., van der Schalk J., & van Kleef, G. A. (2012). Who’s afraid of red, yellow, and blue? Need for cognitive closure predicts aesthetic preferences.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 168-174. [65] Winkielman P., Huber D. E., Kavanagh L., & Schwarz, N. (2012). Fluency of consistency: When thoughts fit nicely and flow smoothly In B Gawronski & F Strack (Eds), Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle in social cognition (pp 89-111) The Guilford Press When thoughts fit nicely and flow smoothly. In B. Gawronski & F. Strack (Eds.), Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle in social cognition (pp. 89-111). The Guilford Press. [66] Winkielman P., Olszanowski M., & Gola M. (2015). Faces in-between: Evaluations reflect the interplay of facial features and task-dependent fluency.Emotion, 15(2), 232-242. [67] Winkielman P., Schwarz N., Fazendeiro T. A., & Reber R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In I. Munch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion(pp. 189-217). Lawrence Erlbaum. [68] Wolf, J. (2020). Predictive coding: Neuroscience and art.Progress in Brain Research, 253, 139-167. [69] Yoo J., Jasko K., & Winkielman P. (2024). Fluency, prediction and motivation: How processing dynamics, expectations and epistemic goals shape aesthetic judgements.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 379(1895), 20230326. [70] Yoo, J., & Winkielman, P. (2023). Constructing aesthetic preferences: The interplay of individual and social influences. The Association for Consumer Research Conference, Seattle, WA, October, 28-30. |