ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2027, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 234-247.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2027.0234 cstr: 32111.14.2027.0234

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

组织中感激表达效应的整合与扩展

曹李梅1, 成翔2, 姚岳炜2, 殷睿2, 陈炜华1, 秦昕2   

  1. 1中山大学旅游学院, 珠海 519082;
    2中山大学管理学院, 广州 510275
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-16 出版日期:2027-01-15 发布日期:2026-11-06
  • 通讯作者: 秦昕, E-mail: qinxin@sysu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(72502250; 72325012)、广东省自然科学基金面上项目(2026A1515011276)、中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2025M780678)、中山大学高校基本科研业务费青年教师培育项目(2025qntd67)

Integrating and expanding the effects of gratitude expression in organizations

CAO Limei1, CHENG Xiang2, YAO Yuewei2, YIN Rui2, CHEN Weihua1, QIN Xin2   

  1. 1School of Tourism Management, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China;
    2School of Business, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
  • Received:2026-03-16 Online:2027-01-15 Published:2026-11-06

摘要: 感激表达是组织情境中常见的人际互动行为, 通常被认为能够传递积极社会信号并产生多方面有益的心理与行为影响。然而, 现有研究发现感激表达在不同情境中可能产生差异化的结果, 其影响机制尚缺乏系统整合与解释。本文在系统梳理相关实证研究的基础上, 从效应范围(个体内 vs. 个体间)与效应效价(积极 vs. 消极)两个维度构建分类框架, 整合了感激表达对表达者、接收者和目睹者的影响, 并据此归纳出个体内积极效应、个体间积极效应、个体间消极效应和个体内消极效应四类效应类型。在此基础上, 本文基于社会关系理论提出以共生关系感知或交换关系感知为核心的效应分化解释框架, 并将影响关系感知的情境线索归纳为个体线索与互动线索两类, 以阐释不同情境条件如何影响感激表达的效应方向。基于上述整合与解释, 本文提出丰富个体内及消极效应研究、系统化边界条件研究以及从时间视角拓展效应研究三个未来研究方向, 为理解感激表达在组织中的复杂作用提供了新的理论视角, 也为未来研究提供了系统化的研究议程。

关键词: 感激, 感激表达, 积极效应, 消极效应, 情境

Abstract: Gratitude is a common psychological experience across time and cultures and has been studied as both a personality trait and an emotional state. Existing reviews have primarily focused on trait gratitude and state gratitude, with particular attention to their beneficial effects on individuals themselves. However, gratitude can also be expressed through interpersonal behavior. In organizational contexts, gratitude expression refers to the verbal and nonverbal behaviors through which individuals convey their gratitude to others. A growing body of empirical research has examined gratitude expression, yet this literature has not been systematically integrated. Moreover, although gratitude expression is generally assumed to convey positive social signals and produce beneficial psychological and behavioral outcomes, existing studies show that its effects may vary across contexts. The mechanisms underlying such variation also remain unclear. Thus, a systematic understanding is needed of both the effects of gratitude expression in organizations and the mechanisms that explain why these effects differ across contexts.
To clarify the effects of gratitude expression, we systematically review existing empirical research and develop a classification framework along two dimensions: the scope of effects (intrapersonal vs. interpersonal) and the valence of effects (positive vs. negative). This framework distinguishes between the effects of gratitude expression on the expresser and those on others (i.e., recipients or observers), and integrates both positive and negative outcomes. Based on these two dimensions, we identify four types of effects: intrapersonal positive effects, interpersonal positive effects, interpersonal negative effects, and intrapersonal negative effects. We further organize these effects across four domains: health, ethics, relationships, and performance. Together, this framework provides a structured overview of the current literature on gratitude expression.
To explain why the effects of gratitude expression differ across contexts, we draw on social relational theory and propose an explanatory framework centered on communal and exchange relationships. We argue that the key lies in how individuals perceive their relationships during interpersonal interactions. When gratitude expression strengthens perceptions of a communal relationship, it generally promotes positive outcomes. In contrast, when contextual cues (e.g., competitive contexts) make an exchange relationship more salient, gratitude expression may produce unintended negative consequences. Importantly, communal and exchange relationships are not mutually exclusive; rather, their relative salience varies across contexts. We therefore categorize the contextual cues that shape relational perceptions into two types: individual cues and interactional cues. These cues influence individuals' information-processing orientations and, in turn, shape the relative salience of communal versus exchange relationship perceptions.
Building on the literature review and theoretical framework, we propose three directions for future research. First, future research could further examine intrapersonal and negative effects that remain insufficiently understood. Second, future research could develop a more systematic framework for understanding boundary conditions by examining how different situational characteristics shape relational perceptions and outcomes. Third, future research could adopt a temporal perspective to examine how relational perceptions accumulate and change across repeated interactions and how these dynamics shape the long-term effects of gratitude expression.
This study systematically integrates and extends the literature on gratitude expression in organizations. First, we develop a two-dimensional classification framework that provides a structured map of the diverse effects of gratitude expression. Compared with existing reviews, this framework not only integrates the positive effects but also distinguishes between interpersonal and intrapersonal negative effects and their underlying psychological mechanisms. In doing so, it moves the literature beyond a predominantly positive view toward a more balanced and comprehensive understanding of gratitude expression. Second, we propose a theoretical framework to explain why gratitude expression may produce different effects across contexts. By focusing on whether gratitude expression strengthens perceptions of a communal relationship or makes an exchange relationship more salient, this framework offers a unifying explanation for previously fragmented findings and provides a theoretical basis for systematically examining the boundary conditions of gratitude expression effects.

Key words: gratitude, gratitude expression, positive effects, negative effects, context

中图分类号: