ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8): 1411-1428.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.01411

• 研究构想 • 上一篇    下一篇

智能制造师徒关系理论构建及对团队双元创新的驱动机制

高中华1, 徐燕2()   

  1. 1中国社会科学院工业经济研究所, 北京 100006
    2首都经济贸易大学工商管理学院, 北京 100070
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-10 出版日期:2023-08-15 发布日期:2023-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 徐燕, E-mail: 1214730775@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(72272148);北京社科基金青年学术带头人项目(21DTR053);教育部人文社科规划项目(21YJA630018);国家自然科学基金重点项目(72132009)

Mentoring in intelligent manufacturing and its impacts on team dual innovation

GAO Zhonghua1, XU Yan2()   

  1. 1Institute of Industrial Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100006, China
    2School of Business Administration, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China
  • Received:2022-11-10 Online:2023-08-15 Published:2023-05-12

摘要:

智能制造正逐渐成为制造业企业在数字经济时代获得竞争优势的新方向, 企业创新则成为制造业推动数智化转型、实现高质量发展的重要途径。然而, 当前关于智能制造以及数智化转型的企业管理研究中, 学者们多聚焦于技术构成、商业模式等宏观层次议题, 缺乏从企业内部社会关系网络视角开展创新的激发过程研究。基于此, 本研究在智能制造情境中构建新型师徒关系理论, 为企业从微观视角激发团队双元创新提供了新的切入点。基于多重团队过程模型, 本研究探讨了智能制造师徒关系通过塑造团队转化和行动两个不同过程激发团队渐进式创新和突破式创新的具体路径, 同时基于人际和人智两个过程分析智能制造情境中团队双元创新激发过程的边界条件。本研究不仅为智能制造情境中的人才培养与管理提供理论思路, 且从微观层次丰富学界对智能制造情境中企业创新驱动机制的认识。

关键词: 智能制造师徒关系, 团队双元创新, 团队过程模型

Abstract:

Intelligent manufacturing provides a direction for manufacturing enterprises to gain competitive advantage in the era of digital economy. Meanwhile, innovation becomes an important way for manufacturing enterprises to promote digital and intelligent transformation in order to achieve high-quality development. However, in the extant literature on intelligent manufacturing and digital transformation, much attention has been largely paid to topics at macro-level topics, such as technology composition and business pattern. Scholars seldom paid attention to the stimulation of innovation from micro-level perspectives, such as team processes, social relationship network, and mentor-protege interactions. Accordingly, this study aims to develop a new mentoring theory based on the context of intelligent manufacturing, which provides a new direction for enterprises to stimulate team dual innovation from micro perspectives.

First, this study theoretically explored the conceptual connotation of mentoring in intelligent manufacturing. We discussed how it was distinct from traditional mentoring from three aspects, including participants, interaction patterns, and relational characteristics. Then, we theoretically discussed how to develop and validate a measure for this construct based on the three-dimension structure of mentoring in the traditional work context, including career guidance, social support and role model. In essence, mentoring in intelligent manufacturing, which usually develops based on an intelligent platform, belongs to a type of social networks that include dyadic, trilateral, one-to-many and many-to-many interpersonal interactions. In this sense, social network analysis is an appropriate approach to measure mentoring in intelligent manufacturing. This study cannot only help to enrich our understanding of mentoring in the context of intelligent manufacturing, but also provide a theoretical framework and relevant tools for future research on the development and effectiveness of mentoring in the context of intelligent manufacturing.

Second, in order to help enterprises successfully cross the ‘last mile’ of digital and intelligent transformation, this study reveals the role of mentoring in stimulating team dual innovation in the context of intelligent manufacturing through integrating the extant literature on team-level outcomes of mentoring and prior research on intelligent manufacturing. We deem that mentoring in intelligent manufacturing can help to enhance team incremental and radical innovation through generating two processes, team transition and team action respectively. Specifically, team technical reflection and team procedural improvement are sequential phases in the team transition process, whereas team transactive memory systems and team knowledge integration are sequential phases in the team action processes. Meanwhile, interpersonal process, which runs through all episodes in the whole team process, provides an important guarantee for team transition process and team action processes. Specifically, team cognitive trust, a variable in interpersonal process, acts as a boundary condition of the team transition process. Moreover, on the basis of three processes in the TAR model, we add human-AI process as a new type of team process that is specific to the context to intelligent manufacturing. We believe that team technical trust, a variable in human-AI process serves as a boundary condition about how mentoring in intelligent manufacturing affects team dual innovation through activating transition and action processes in the team.

Finally, this study also builds a systematic framework for the establishment and optimization of the mentoring theory in intelligent manufacturing, which further provides new directions for facilitating the evolution of work force from ‘line workers’ to ‘innovative talents’ in the digital intelligent transformation process of enterprises. In sum, this study contributes to both the theory and the practice not only by updating the concept of mentoring in intelligent manufacturing, which enriches the understanding of the micro mechanism of enterprise innovation in intelligent manufacturing, but also by building a systematic model as a guidance to the practices of talent nurturing and developing in this context.

Key words: mentoring in intelligent manufacturing, team dual innovation, team process model

中图分类号: