心理科学进展 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 1287-1301.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.01287
潘静洲, 杨雯静
收稿日期:
2023-12-31
出版日期:
2024-08-15
发布日期:
2024-06-05
通讯作者:
潘静洲, E-mail: painepjz@sina.com
基金资助:
PAN Jingzhou, YANG Wenjing
Received:
2023-12-31
Online:
2024-08-15
Published:
2024-06-05
摘要: 在组织中, 领导与下属的交换关系(Leader-member exchange, LMX)不是一成不变的, 而是会随着时间以及关键事件的触发而发生变化。然而以往研究缺乏探索LMX形成和发展的动态研究, 且对事件推动变化的认识不足。本研究从激发LMX质量发生变化的“关键事件”切入, 系统分析引起LMX关系动态变化的前因及潜在的影响机制。首先, 通过演绎理论构建和归纳定性研究相结合的方法初步探索LMX关系变化的基本趋势及触动其变动的关键事件。其次, 在对LMX变化基本规律和触发LMX变化的关键事件初步探索的基础上, 针对LMX发展的不同时期的动态变化开展实证研究。针对LMX建立阶段, 着眼于员工与领导直接互动和间接互动的事件, 探索新员工的LMX建立与发展的过程。针对LMX常规化阶段, 基于事件研究的视角, 探索触发LMX再变化的组织内外部重要事件及LMX变化规律。研究以关键事件作为切入点, 发展了LMX动态变化的理论, 并为管理者和团队管理实践提供思路和建议。
中图分类号:
潘静洲, 杨雯静. (2024). 关键事件触发的领导与下属交换关系的变化及作用机制. 心理科学进展 , 32(8), 1287-1301.
PAN Jingzhou, YANG Wenjing. (2024). Changes in leader-member exchange triggered by key events and the related mechanisms. Advances in Psychological Science, 32(8), 1287-1301.
[1] 李翠, 程志超. (2013). 领导-成员交换关系对团队创新的影响. [2] 李秀娟, 魏峰. (2006). 打开领导有效性的黑箱: 领导行为和领导下属关系研究. [3] 李永芳, 吕慧, 宋琪, 陈扬. (2022). “至关重要”如何促进“精进不休”?——事件关键性对员工工作绩效的影响机制研究. [4] 刘东, 刘军. (2017). 事件系统理论原理及其在管理科研与实践中的应用分析. [5] 孟陆, 刘凤军, 段珅, 陈欣, 李同茂. (2023). 共享员工事件强度对公民行为的影响——基于企业社会责任感知的视角. [6] 潘静洲, 唐子阳, 张光磊, 钟锐. (2021). 领导-下属交换关系差异化基础对分配公平氛围及团队绩效的影响. [7] 童辉杰, 杨雪龙. (2003). 关于严重突发事件危机干预的研究评述. [8] 王辉, 牛雄鹰, Kenneth S. Law. (2004). 领导-部属交换的多维结构及对工作绩效和情境绩效的影响. [9] 王忠军, 龙立荣, 刘丽丹. (2011). 组织中主管-下属关系的运作机制与效果. [10] 吴婷, 张正堂. (2017). LMX对员工组织支持感知与情绪枯竭的影响——LMX差异化的调节作用. [11] 徐广路, 王皓天. (2023). 人工智能冲击意识对员工职业满意度的影响: 工作压力和目标导向的作用. [12] Anand S., Vidyarthi P. R., & Park, H. S. (2015). LMX differentiation: Understanding relational leadership at individual and group levels In T N Bauer & B Erdogan (Eds), The Oxford handbook of leader-member exchange (pp 525-574) Oxford University Press Understanding relational leadership at individual and group levels. In T. N. Bauer & B. Erdogan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of leader-member exchange (pp. 525-574). Oxford University Press. [13] Ashford, S. J., & Black, J. S. (1996). Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of desire for control. [14] Bartels A. L., Nahrgang J. D., Sessions H., Wilson K. S., & Law-Penrose J. (2022). With a frown or a smile: How leader affective states spark the leader-follower reciprocal exchange process.Personnel Psychology, 75(1), 147-177. [15] Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test.Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1538-1567. [16] Beersma B.,Van Kleef, G. A., & Dijkstra, M. T. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of gossip in work groups. In F. Giardini & R. Wittek (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gossip and reputation (pp. 417-434). Oxford University Press. [17] Bendersky, C., & Hays, N. A. (2012). Status conflict in groups.Organization Science, 23(2), 323-340. [18] Bergeron, D. M. (2007). The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost?Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1078-1095. [19] Blau, P. (1964). [20] Boekhorst J. A., Basir N., & Malhotra S. (2024). Star light, but why not so bright? A process model of how incumbents influence star newcomer performance.Academy of Management Review, 49(1), 56-79. [21] Bowling N. A., Beehr T. A., & Swader W. M. (2005). Giving and receiving social support at work: The roles of personality and reciprocity.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(3), 476-489. [22] Boyd, N. G., & Taylor, R. R. (1998). A developmental approach to the examination of friendship in leader- follower relationships.Leadership Quarterly, 9(1), 0-25. [23] Bundy J., Pfarrer M. D., Short C. E., & Coombs W. T. (2017). Crises and crisis management: Integration, interpretation, and research development. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1661-1692. [24] Chen Y., Liu D., Tang G., & Hogan T. M. (2021). Workplace events and employee creativity: A multistudy field investigation.Personnel Psychology, 74(2), 211-236. [25] Cropanzano R., Dasborough M. T., & Weiss H. M. (2017). Affective events and the development of leader-member exchange.Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 233-258. [26] Dansereau F., Jr., Graen G., & Haga W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46-78. [27] Day D. V.,& Miscenko, D. (2015). Leader-member exchange (LMX): Construct evolution, contributions, and future prospects for advancing leadership theory. In T. N. Bauer & B. Erdogan (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of leader-member exchange (pp. 9-28). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. [28] De Vos, A., & Freese, C. (2011). Sensemaking during organizational entry: Changes in newcomer information seeking and the relationship with psychological contract fulfilment.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(2), 288-314. [29] Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development.Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 618-634. [30] Dimotakis N., Lambert L. S., Fu S., Boulamatsi A., Smith T. A., Runnalls B., .. Maurer T. (2023). Gains and losses: Week-to-week changes in leader-follower relationships.Academy of Management Journal, 66(1), 248-275. [31] Dulebohn J. H., Bommer W. H., Liden R. C., Brouer R. L., & Ferris G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future.Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715-1759. [32] Ellis A. M., Bauer T. N., Erdogan B., & Truxillo D. M. (2018). Daily perceptions of relationship quality with leaders: Implications for follower well-being.Work and Stress, 33(2), 119-136. [33] Ellis A. M., Nifadkar S. S., Bauer T. N., & Erdogan B. (2017). Newcomer adjustment: Examining the role of managers’ perception of newcomer proactive behavior during organizational socialization.Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(6), 993-1001. [34] Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2005). From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 659-676. [35] Erdogan B.,& Bauer, T. N. (2014). Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory: The relational approach to leadership. In S. K. Parker & C. H. Wu (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp. 407-456). Oxford University Press. [36] Ford, L. R., & Seers, A. (2006). Relational leadership and team climates: Pitting differentiation versus agreement.The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 258-270. [37] Galvin B. M., Waldman D. A., & Balthazard P. (2010). Visionary communication qualities as mediators of the relationship between narcissism and attributions of leader charisma.Personnel Psychology, 63(3), 509-537. [38] Graen, G. B. (1976). Role making processes within complex organizations. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed.), [39] Graen G. B.,& Cashman, J. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership frontiers (pp. 143-166). Kent, OH: Kent State University Press. [40] Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing.Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175-208. [41] Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective.Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247. [42] Grosser T. J., Lopez-Kidwell V., Labianca G. J., & Ellwardt L. (2012). Hearing it through the grapevine: Positive and negative workplace gossip.Organizational Dynamics, 41(1), 52-61. [43] Heider, F. (1958). [44] Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress.American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524. [45] Ilies R., Schwind K. M., Wagner D. T., Johnson M. D., DeRue D. S., & Ilgen D. R. (2007). When can employees have a family life? The effects of daily workload and affect on work-family conflict and social behaviors at home.Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1368-1379. [46] Jiang J. Y., Law K. S., & Sun, J. J. M. (2014). Leader-member relationship and burnout: The moderating role of leader integrity.Management and Organization Review, 10(2), 223-247. [47] Jones, G. R. (1983). Transaction costs, property rights, and organizational culture: An exchange perspective. [48] Kahn R. L., Wolfe D. M., Quinn R. P., Snoek J. D., & Rosenthal R. A. (1964). [49] Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 657-690. [50] Lam W., Huang X., & Snape E. D. (2007). Feedback- seeking behavior and leader-member exchange: Do supervisor-attributed motives matter?Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 348-363. [51] Lawler, E. J., & Thye, S. R. (1999). Bringing emotions into social exchange theory.Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 217-244. [52] Liao Z., Liu W., Li X., & Song Z. (2019). Give and take: An episodic perspective on leader-member exchange.Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(1), 34-51. [53] Liden R. C., Wayne S. J., & Stilwell D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader- member exchanges.Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 662-674. [54] Lin W., Shao Y., Li G., Guo Y., & Zhan X. (2021). The psychological implications of COVID-19 on employee job insecurity and its consequences: The mitigating role of organization adaptive practices.Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(3), 317-329. [55] Liu D., Chen Y., & Li N. (2021). Tackling the negative impact of COVID-19 on work engagement and taking charge: A multi-study investigation of frontline health workers.Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(2), 185-198. [56] Louis, M. R. (1980). Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings.Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(2), 226-251. [57] Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward.Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57-125. [58] Martin R., Guillaume Y., Thomas G., Lee A., & Epitropaki O. (2016). Leader-member exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta-analytic review.Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 67-121. [59] Martin R., Ono M., Legood A., Dello Russo S., & Thomas G. (2023). Leader-member exchange (LMX) quality and follower well-being: A daily diary study.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 28(2), 103-116. [60] Matta F. K., Scott B. A., Koopman J., & Conlon D. E. (2015). Does seeing “eye to eye” affect work engagement and organizational citizenship behavior? A role theory perspective on LMX agreement.Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1686-1708. [61] Min S. W., Humphrey S. E., Aime F., Petrenko O. V., Quade M. J., & Fu S. (Q.). (2022). Dealing with new members: Team members’ reactions to newcomer’s attractiveness and sex.Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(7), 1115-1129. [62] Morgeson F. P., Mitchell T. R., & Liu D. (2015). Event System Theory: An Event-Oriented Approach to the Organizational Sciences.Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 515-537. [63] Nahrgang J. D., Morgeson F. P., & Ilies R. (2009). The development of leader-member exchanges: Exploring how personality and performance influence leader and member relationships over time.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 108(2), 256-266. [64] Naidoo L. J., Scherbaum C. A., Goldstein H. W., & Graen G. B. (2011). A longitudinal examination of the effects of LMX, ability, and differentiation on team performance.Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(3), 347-357. [65] Okhuysen, G. A. (2001). Structuring change: Familiarity and formal interventions in problem-solving groups.Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 794-808. [66] Pan J., Zheng X., Xu H., Li J., & Lam C. K. (2021). What if my coworker builds a better LMX? The roles of envy and coworker pride for the relationships of LMX social comparison with learning and undermining.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(9), 1144-1167. [67] Park S., Sturman M. C., Vanderpool C., & Chan E. (2015). Only time will tell: The changing relationships between LMX, job performance, and justice.Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 660-680. [68] Poulin, F., & Chan, A. (2010). Friendship stability and change in childhood and adolescence.Developmental Review, 30(3), 257-272. [69] Reichers, A. E. (1987). An interactionist perspective on newcomer socialization rates.Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 278-287. [70] Rentsch, J. R. (1990). Climate and culture: Interaction and qualitative differences in organizational meanings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 668-681. [71] Rockstuhl T., Dulebohn J. H., Ang S., & Shore L. M. (2012). Leader-member exchange (LMX) and culture: A meta-analysis of correlates of LMX across 23 countries.Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1097-1130. [72] Saks, A. M. (1994). Moderating effects of self‐efficacy for the relationship between training method and anxiety and stress reactions of newcomers.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(7), 639-654. [73] Saks A. M., Uggerslev K. L., & Fassina N. E. (2007). Socialization tactics and newcomer adjustment: A meta-analytic review and test of a model.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(3), 413-446. [74] Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design.Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224-253. [75] Scott, K. A., & Zweig, D. (2020). The cynical subordinate: Exploring organizational cynicism, LMX, and loyalty.Personnel Review, 49(8), 1731-1748. [76] Sherony, K. M., & Green, S. G. (2002). Coworker exchange: Relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 542-548. [77] Sluss, D. M., & Thompson, B. S. (2012). Socializing the newcomer: The mediating role of leader-member exchange.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 114-125. [78] Sommerfeld R. D., Krambeck H. J., Semmann D., & Milinski M. (2007). Gossip as an alternative for direct observation in games of indirect reciprocity.Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences, 104(44), 17435-17440. [79] Summers J. K., Humphrey S. E., & Ferris G. R. (2012). Team member change, flux in coordination, and performance: Effects of strategic core roles, information transfer, and cognitive ability.Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 314-338. [80] Tan N., Yam K. C., Zhang P., & Brown D. J. (2021). Are you gossiping about me? The costs and benefits of high workplace gossip prevalence.Journal of Business and Psychology, 36, 417-434. [81] Tse H. H. M., Troth A. C., Ashkanasy N. M., & Liden R. C. (2021). New perspectives for studying the role of affect in interpersonal work relationships.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(9), 1135-1143. [82] Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited.Group & Organization Studies, 2(4), 419-427. [83] Tyre, M. J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1994). Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations.Organization Science, 5(1), 98-118. [84] Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. [85] Vidyarthi P. R., Liden R. C., Anand S., Erdogan B., & Ghosh S. (2010). Where do I stand? Examining the effects of leader-member exchange social comparison on employee work behaviors.Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 849-861. [86] Wayne S. J., Shore L. M., Bommer W. H., & Tetrick L. E. (2002). The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange.Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 590-598. [87] Zhang L., Gao Y., Lu W., & Guo W. (2023). The influence of conflict event strength on interorganizational cooperation: Moderating roles of contractual complexity and trust.Journal of Business Research, 159, 113750. |
[1] | 王祯, 管健. 性别刻板印象的变与不变?来自内容、方法与影响的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(6): 939-950. |
[2] | 陈子龙, 季琭妍. 多面孔情绪变异性的自动化加工:来自视觉失匹配负波的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(suppl.): 34-34. |
[3] | 黄一丰, 沈毅, 赵苑秀. 事件信息与客体信息在视觉工作记忆中的独立存储[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(suppl.): 81-81. |
[4] | 罗钰萱, 张奇凯, 吴静岚, 高在峰. 社会交互信息在工作记忆中的表征方式:工作记忆中的“同事件优势”[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(suppl.): 82-82. |
[5] | 孙建群, 叶文娟, 李锐, 田晓明. 团队建设性偏差的形成与影响过程:组织惯例演变的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(6): 932-943. |
[6] | 刘文华, 温秀娟, 陈灵, 杨瑞, 胡逸儒. 奖励期待和结果评估的脑电成分在精神疾病研究中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(5): 783-799. |
[7] | 王颂, 张了丹, 栾琨. 员工网络建构行为的概念内涵及作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(5): 840-853. |
[8] | 张莹, 张剑, 张静雅, 巩振兴. 职业冲击的新分类及不同理论视角下的影响效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(5): 854-865. |
[9] | 刘源, 都弘彦, 方杰, 温忠麟. 国内追踪数据分析方法研究与模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(8): 1734-1746. |
[10] | 方慧, 付辉建, 张慧君. 胜任需要挫败的“双刃剑”效应及干预策略:行为和认知神经科学视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(5): 1005-1017. |
[11] | 饶婷婷, 朱晓文, 杨沈龙, 白洁. 突发公共事件中公众的补偿性控制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(5): 1119-1130. |
[12] | 王海珍, 耿紫珍, 丁琳, 单春霞. 辱虐管理的成因[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(4): 906-921. |
[13] | 朱传林, 刘电芝, 罗文波. 情绪体验影响估算策略运用的认知与脑机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(12): 2639-2649. |
[14] | 郝喜玲, 刘依冉, 杜晶晶, 郑方. 失败恐惧的形成及对创业行为的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(9): 1551-1560. |
[15] | 王晓田, 王娜, 何金波. 前瞻性情绪作为社会风险的信息源假说:公共场景下风险决策的情绪及文化机制探讨[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 959-966. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||