心理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (4): 355-370.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00355
司继伟1(), 郭凯玥1, 赵晓萌1, 张明亮1,2, 李红霞1, 黄碧娟1, 徐艳丽1
收稿日期:
2021-05-14
发布日期:
2022-02-21
出版日期:
2022-04-25
通讯作者:
司继伟
E-mail:sijiwei1974@126.com
基金资助:
SI Jiwei1(), GUO Kaiyue1, ZHAO Xiaomeng1, ZHANG Mingliang1,2, LI Hongxia1, HUANG Bijuan1, XU Yanli1
Received:
2021-05-14
Online:
2022-02-21
Published:
2022-04-25
Contact:
SI Jiwei
E-mail:sijiwei1974@126.com
摘要:
研究采用潜在转变分析考察小学儿童数学焦虑的类别转变以及父母教育卷入在小学儿童数学焦虑类别转变中的作用。以1720名三、四年级儿童为被试, 对其数学焦虑和感知到的父母教育卷入进行3次追踪, 每次间隔1年。结果表明:(1)小学儿童数学焦虑存在低数学焦虑组、高数学评估焦虑组和高数学获得焦虑组3种不同类别; (2)随时间的推移, 高数学评估焦虑组倾向于向低数学焦虑组转变, 高数学获得焦虑组倾向于向高数学评估焦虑组转变, 而低数学焦虑组稳定性较强; (3)父亲/母亲教育卷入对儿童数学焦虑类别转变的预测作用, 因不同的数学焦虑类别而异。上述发现为深入理解数学焦虑的形成机制以及干预措施的制定提供了重要参考。
中图分类号:
司继伟, 郭凯玥, 赵晓萌, 张明亮, 李红霞, 黄碧娟, 徐艳丽. (2022). 小学儿童数学焦虑的潜在类别转变及其父母教育卷入效应:3年纵向考察. 心理学报, 54(4), 355-370.
SI Jiwei, GUO Kaiyue, ZHAO Xiaomeng, ZHANG Mingliang, LI Hongxia, HUANG Bijuan, XU Yanli. (2022). Transition of latent classes of children’s mathematics anxiety in primary school and the distinctive effects of parental educational involvement: A three-wave longitudinal study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(4), 355-370.
模型 | S-Bχ2 (df ) | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | ∆χ2 (∆df ) | p | ∆CFI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
父亲教育卷入 | |||||||
Model 1 | 8652.034 (3462) | 0.931 | 0.925 | 0.030 | - | - | - |
Model 2 | 8805.099 (3510) | 0.929 | 0.925 | 0.030 | 153.065 (48) | < 0.01 | 0.002 |
Model 3 | 9094.466 (3558) | 0.926 | 0.922 | 0.030 | 289.367 (48) | < 0.01 | 0.003 |
母亲教育卷入 | |||||||
Model 1 | 7733.688 (3462) | 0.926 | 0.920 | 0.027 | - | - | - |
Model 2 | 7923.238 (3510) | 0.924 | 0.919 | 0.027 | 189.550 (48) | < 0.01 | 0.002 |
Model 3 | 8425.155 (3558) | 0.916 | 0.912 | 0.028 | 501.917 (48) | < 0.01 | 0.008 |
数学焦虑 | |||||||
Model 1 | 3951.169 (1947) | 0.956 | 0.951 | 0.024 | - | - | - |
Model 2 | 4032.857 (1983) | 0.955 | 0.951 | 0.025 | 81.688 (36) | < 0.01 | 0.001 |
Model 3 | 4192.570 (2019) | 0.952 | 0.949 | 0.025 | 159.713 (36) | < 0.01 | 0.003 |
表1 各量表在3个时间点的纵向不变性检验拟合指数
模型 | S-Bχ2 (df ) | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | ∆χ2 (∆df ) | p | ∆CFI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
父亲教育卷入 | |||||||
Model 1 | 8652.034 (3462) | 0.931 | 0.925 | 0.030 | - | - | - |
Model 2 | 8805.099 (3510) | 0.929 | 0.925 | 0.030 | 153.065 (48) | < 0.01 | 0.002 |
Model 3 | 9094.466 (3558) | 0.926 | 0.922 | 0.030 | 289.367 (48) | < 0.01 | 0.003 |
母亲教育卷入 | |||||||
Model 1 | 7733.688 (3462) | 0.926 | 0.920 | 0.027 | - | - | - |
Model 2 | 7923.238 (3510) | 0.924 | 0.919 | 0.027 | 189.550 (48) | < 0.01 | 0.002 |
Model 3 | 8425.155 (3558) | 0.916 | 0.912 | 0.028 | 501.917 (48) | < 0.01 | 0.008 |
数学焦虑 | |||||||
Model 1 | 3951.169 (1947) | 0.956 | 0.951 | 0.024 | - | - | - |
Model 2 | 4032.857 (1983) | 0.955 | 0.951 | 0.025 | 81.688 (36) | < 0.01 | 0.001 |
Model 3 | 4192.570 (2019) | 0.952 | 0.949 | 0.025 | 159.713 (36) | < 0.01 | 0.003 |
变量 | T1父亲 教育卷入 | T2父亲 教育卷入 | T3父亲 教育卷入 | T1母亲 教育卷入 | T2母亲 教育卷入 | T3母亲 教育卷入 | T1儿童 数学焦虑 | T2儿童 数学焦虑 | T3儿童 数学焦虑 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别 | |||||||||
男 | 2.55 (0.71) | 2.68 (0.79) | 2.70 (0.73) | 2.85 (0.61) | 3.10 (0.63) | 3.16 (0.63) | 1.93 (0.62) | 1.86 (0.67) | 1.77 (0.68) |
女 | 2.60 (0.69) | 2.73 (0.74) | 2.61 (0.73) | 2.90 (0.60) | 3.10 (0.62) | 3.08 (0.64) | 1.82 (0.60) | 1.80 (0.62) | 1.79 (0.61) |
年级 | |||||||||
三年级 | 2.52 (0.70) | 2.59 (0.74) | 2.67 (0.71) | 2.78 (0.60) | 3.01 (0.61) | 3.14 (0.62) | 1.99 (0.64) | 1.92 (0.64) | 1.83 (0.66) |
四年级 | 2.62 (0.70) | 2.82 (0.79) | 2.66 (0.75) | 2.96 (0.61) | 3.19 (0.62) | 3.11 (0.65) | 1.78 (0.57) | 1.75 (0.65) | 1.73 (0.63) |
性别(r) | 0.04 | 0.03 | -0.06* | 0.04 | -0.01 | -0.06* | -0.09** | -0.05* | 0.01 |
年级(r) | 0.07** | 0.15** | -0.01 | 0.14** | 0.14** | -0.02 | -0.17** | -0.14** | -0.08** |
考试焦虑(r) | -0.13** | -0.14** | -0.14** | -0.10** | -0.11** | -0.09** | 0.39** | 0.29** | 0.24** |
T1数学成绩(r) | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.06* | 0.03 | 0.02 | -0.25** | -0.23** | -0.26** |
T2数学成绩(r) | 0.06* | 0.08** | 0.09** | 0.10** | 0.08** | 0.09** | -0.26** | -0.24** | -0.31** |
T3数学成绩(r) | 0.09** | 0.04 | 0.05* | 0.10** | 0.07** | 0.06** | -0.26** | -0.27** | -0.33** |
表2 父母教育卷入和儿童数学焦虑在性别和年级上的描述统计[M (SD)]
变量 | T1父亲 教育卷入 | T2父亲 教育卷入 | T3父亲 教育卷入 | T1母亲 教育卷入 | T2母亲 教育卷入 | T3母亲 教育卷入 | T1儿童 数学焦虑 | T2儿童 数学焦虑 | T3儿童 数学焦虑 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别 | |||||||||
男 | 2.55 (0.71) | 2.68 (0.79) | 2.70 (0.73) | 2.85 (0.61) | 3.10 (0.63) | 3.16 (0.63) | 1.93 (0.62) | 1.86 (0.67) | 1.77 (0.68) |
女 | 2.60 (0.69) | 2.73 (0.74) | 2.61 (0.73) | 2.90 (0.60) | 3.10 (0.62) | 3.08 (0.64) | 1.82 (0.60) | 1.80 (0.62) | 1.79 (0.61) |
年级 | |||||||||
三年级 | 2.52 (0.70) | 2.59 (0.74) | 2.67 (0.71) | 2.78 (0.60) | 3.01 (0.61) | 3.14 (0.62) | 1.99 (0.64) | 1.92 (0.64) | 1.83 (0.66) |
四年级 | 2.62 (0.70) | 2.82 (0.79) | 2.66 (0.75) | 2.96 (0.61) | 3.19 (0.62) | 3.11 (0.65) | 1.78 (0.57) | 1.75 (0.65) | 1.73 (0.63) |
性别(r) | 0.04 | 0.03 | -0.06* | 0.04 | -0.01 | -0.06* | -0.09** | -0.05* | 0.01 |
年级(r) | 0.07** | 0.15** | -0.01 | 0.14** | 0.14** | -0.02 | -0.17** | -0.14** | -0.08** |
考试焦虑(r) | -0.13** | -0.14** | -0.14** | -0.10** | -0.11** | -0.09** | 0.39** | 0.29** | 0.24** |
T1数学成绩(r) | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.06* | 0.03 | 0.02 | -0.25** | -0.23** | -0.26** |
T2数学成绩(r) | 0.06* | 0.08** | 0.09** | 0.10** | 0.08** | 0.09** | -0.26** | -0.24** | -0.31** |
T3数学成绩(r) | 0.09** | 0.04 | 0.05* | 0.10** | 0.07** | 0.06** | -0.26** | -0.27** | -0.33** |
时间点 | 类别数目 | AIC | BIC | aBIC | Entropy | LMRT (p) | BLRT (p) | 所占比例(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 2 | 16547.51 | 16618.36 | 16577.06 | 0.90 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 71.3 / 28.7 |
3 | 15381.52 | 15479.63 | 15422.44 | 0.86 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 49.2 / 35.2 / 15.6 | |
4 | 14698.64 | 14824.00 | 14750.93 | 0.88 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 45.8 / 32.2 / 4.4 / 17.6 | |
5 | 14480.28 | 14632.88 | 14543.93 | 0.83 | >0.05 | < 0.01 | 38.4 / 28.1 / 14.7 / 4.3 / 14.5 | |
T2 | 2 | 16291.11 | 16361.96 | 16320.66 | 0.92 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 71.3 / 28.7 |
3 | 15070.49 | 15168.59 | 15111.41 | 0.88 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 54.2 / 32.8 / 13.0 | |
4 | 14336.19 | 14461.55 | 14388.48 | 0.90 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 49.3 / 30.3 / 2.7 / 17.7 | |
5 | 14015.38 | 14167.98 | 14079.03 | 0.90 | >0.05 | < 0.01 | 46.6 / 9.6 / 14.1 / 2.2 / 27.5 | |
T3 | 2 | 15736.23 | 15807.08 | 15765.78 | 0.94 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 76.3 / 23.7 |
3 | 14499.57 | 14597.67 | 14540.49 | 0.93 | < 0.05 | < 0.01 | 68.1 / 24.7 / 7.2 | |
4 | 13692.59 | 13817.94 | 13744.87 | 0.90 | < 0.05 | < 0.01 | 53.3 / 27.6 / 15.2 / 3.9 | |
5 | 13374.71 | 13527.32 | 13438.36 | 0.88 | >0.05 | < 0.01 | 48.9 / 9.2 / 14.3 / 25.4 / 2.2 |
表4 T1、T2、T3各LPA模型的模型拟合指标
时间点 | 类别数目 | AIC | BIC | aBIC | Entropy | LMRT (p) | BLRT (p) | 所占比例(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 2 | 16547.51 | 16618.36 | 16577.06 | 0.90 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 71.3 / 28.7 |
3 | 15381.52 | 15479.63 | 15422.44 | 0.86 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 49.2 / 35.2 / 15.6 | |
4 | 14698.64 | 14824.00 | 14750.93 | 0.88 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 45.8 / 32.2 / 4.4 / 17.6 | |
5 | 14480.28 | 14632.88 | 14543.93 | 0.83 | >0.05 | < 0.01 | 38.4 / 28.1 / 14.7 / 4.3 / 14.5 | |
T2 | 2 | 16291.11 | 16361.96 | 16320.66 | 0.92 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 71.3 / 28.7 |
3 | 15070.49 | 15168.59 | 15111.41 | 0.88 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 54.2 / 32.8 / 13.0 | |
4 | 14336.19 | 14461.55 | 14388.48 | 0.90 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 49.3 / 30.3 / 2.7 / 17.7 | |
5 | 14015.38 | 14167.98 | 14079.03 | 0.90 | >0.05 | < 0.01 | 46.6 / 9.6 / 14.1 / 2.2 / 27.5 | |
T3 | 2 | 15736.23 | 15807.08 | 15765.78 | 0.94 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 76.3 / 23.7 |
3 | 14499.57 | 14597.67 | 14540.49 | 0.93 | < 0.05 | < 0.01 | 68.1 / 24.7 / 7.2 | |
4 | 13692.59 | 13817.94 | 13744.87 | 0.90 | < 0.05 | < 0.01 | 53.3 / 27.6 / 15.2 / 3.9 | |
5 | 13374.71 | 13527.32 | 13438.36 | 0.88 | >0.05 | < 0.01 | 48.9 / 9.2 / 14.3 / 25.4 / 2.2 |
维度 | 低数学焦虑组 | 数学评估焦虑组 | 数学获得焦虑组 | F | ηp2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | |||||
数学评估焦虑 | -0.69 (0.72)a | 0.67 (0.68)b | 0.80 (0.75)b | 829.48*** | 0.49 |
数学学习焦虑 | -0.71 (0.33)a | 0.32 (0.59)b | 1.78 (0.81)c | 2362.426*** | 0.73 |
数学问题解决焦虑 | -0.73 (0.45)a | 0.44 (0.63)b | 1.54 (0.79)c | 1775.93*** | 0.67 |
数学教师焦虑 | -0.62 (0.35)a | 0.16 (0.74)b | 1.83 (0.75)c | 1740.40*** | 0.67 |
T2 | |||||
数学评估焦虑 | -0.68 (0.65)a | 0.67 (0.75)b | 0.88 (0.77)c | 870.18*** | 0.50 |
数学学习焦虑 | -0.68 (0.28)a | 0.28 (0.61)b | 1.82 (0.80)c | 2456.36*** | 0.74 |
数学问题解决焦虑 | -0.72 (0.38)a | 0.40 (0.60)b | 1.65 (0.81)c | 2099.78*** | 0.71 |
数学教师焦虑 | -0.59 (0.32)a | 0.14 (0.69)b | 1.83 (0.92)c | 1721.54*** | 0.67 |
T3 | |||||
数学评估焦虑 | -0.64 (0.64)a | 0.73 (0.71)b | 0.97 (0.82)c | 949.11*** | 0.53 |
数学学习焦虑 | -0.62 (0.27)a | 0.24 (0.57)b | 1.87 (0.86)c | 2679.75*** | 0.76 |
数学问题解决焦虑 | -0.66 (0.34)a | 0.37 (0.55)b | 1.77 (0.82)c | 2576.41*** | 0.75 |
数学教师焦虑 | -0.59 (0.30)a | 0.21 (0.68)b | 1.79 (0.93)c | 1864.27*** | 0.69 |
表5 三个数学焦虑亚组在数学焦虑各维度上的均值标准分差异
维度 | 低数学焦虑组 | 数学评估焦虑组 | 数学获得焦虑组 | F | ηp2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | |||||
数学评估焦虑 | -0.69 (0.72)a | 0.67 (0.68)b | 0.80 (0.75)b | 829.48*** | 0.49 |
数学学习焦虑 | -0.71 (0.33)a | 0.32 (0.59)b | 1.78 (0.81)c | 2362.426*** | 0.73 |
数学问题解决焦虑 | -0.73 (0.45)a | 0.44 (0.63)b | 1.54 (0.79)c | 1775.93*** | 0.67 |
数学教师焦虑 | -0.62 (0.35)a | 0.16 (0.74)b | 1.83 (0.75)c | 1740.40*** | 0.67 |
T2 | |||||
数学评估焦虑 | -0.68 (0.65)a | 0.67 (0.75)b | 0.88 (0.77)c | 870.18*** | 0.50 |
数学学习焦虑 | -0.68 (0.28)a | 0.28 (0.61)b | 1.82 (0.80)c | 2456.36*** | 0.74 |
数学问题解决焦虑 | -0.72 (0.38)a | 0.40 (0.60)b | 1.65 (0.81)c | 2099.78*** | 0.71 |
数学教师焦虑 | -0.59 (0.32)a | 0.14 (0.69)b | 1.83 (0.92)c | 1721.54*** | 0.67 |
T3 | |||||
数学评估焦虑 | -0.64 (0.64)a | 0.73 (0.71)b | 0.97 (0.82)c | 949.11*** | 0.53 |
数学学习焦虑 | -0.62 (0.27)a | 0.24 (0.57)b | 1.87 (0.86)c | 2679.75*** | 0.76 |
数学问题解决焦虑 | -0.66 (0.34)a | 0.37 (0.55)b | 1.77 (0.82)c | 2576.41*** | 0.75 |
数学教师焦虑 | -0.59 (0.30)a | 0.21 (0.68)b | 1.79 (0.93)c | 1864.27*** | 0.69 |
时间点 | 低数学焦虑组 | 高数学评估焦虑组 | 高数学获得焦虑组 |
---|---|---|---|
潜在状态概率 | |||
T1 | 0.49 | 0.35 | 0.16 |
T2 | 0.54 | 0.33 | 0.13 |
T3 | 0.68 | 0.25 | 0.07 |
T1到T2的转变概率 | |||
低数学焦虑组 | 0.73 | 0.20 | 0.07 |
高数学评估焦虑组 | 0.29 | 0.50 | 0.21 |
高数学获得焦虑组 | 0.31 | 0.45 | 0.24 |
T2到T3的转变概率 | |||
低数学焦虑组 | 0.82 | 0.13 | 0.05 |
高数学评估焦虑组 | 0.31 | 0.51 | 0.18 |
高数学获得焦虑组 | 0.21 | 0.36 | 0.43 |
表6 T1~T3的潜在状态概率和潜在转变概率
时间点 | 低数学焦虑组 | 高数学评估焦虑组 | 高数学获得焦虑组 |
---|---|---|---|
潜在状态概率 | |||
T1 | 0.49 | 0.35 | 0.16 |
T2 | 0.54 | 0.33 | 0.13 |
T3 | 0.68 | 0.25 | 0.07 |
T1到T2的转变概率 | |||
低数学焦虑组 | 0.73 | 0.20 | 0.07 |
高数学评估焦虑组 | 0.29 | 0.50 | 0.21 |
高数学获得焦虑组 | 0.31 | 0.45 | 0.24 |
T2到T3的转变概率 | |||
低数学焦虑组 | 0.82 | 0.13 | 0.05 |
高数学评估焦虑组 | 0.31 | 0.51 | 0.18 |
高数学获得焦虑组 | 0.21 | 0.36 | 0.43 |
潜在状态 | 影响因素 | 低数学焦虑组 | 高数学评估焦虑组 | 高数学获得焦虑组 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B (SE) | OR | 95% CI | B (SE) | OR | 95% CI | B (SE) | OR | 95% CI | ||
T1到T2 | ||||||||||
低数学焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | -0.49** (0.15) | 0.61 | [0.45, 0.82] | -0.23 (0.25) | 0.79 | [0.49, 1.28] |
母亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | 0.14 (0.19) | 1.16 | [0.80, 1.66] | -0.36 (0.29) | 0.70 | [0.40, 1.23] | |
高数学评估焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | -0.01 (0.16) | 0.99 | [0.72, 1.36] | - | - | - | 0.11 (0.18) | 1.11 | [0.78, 1.58] |
母亲教育卷入 | 0.38* (0.19) | 1.46 | [1.01, 2.11] | - | - | - | -0.21 (0.20) | 0.81 | [0.55, 1.21] | |
高数学获得焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | 0.15 (0.31) | 1.16 | [0.63, 2.13] | -0.24 (0.29) | 0.78 | [0.45, 1.37] | - | - | - |
母亲教育卷入 | -0.09 (0.34) | 0.92 | [0.48, 1.77] | 0.18 (0.31) | 1.20 | [0.65, 2.21] | - | - | - | |
T2到T3 | ||||||||||
低数学焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | 0.26 (0.17) | 1.29 | [0.93, 1.78] | -0.07 (0.23) | 0.93 | [0.60, 1.45] |
母亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | -0.92*** (0.19) | 0.40 | [0.27, 0.58] | -0.43 (0.29) | 0.65 | [0.37, 1.14] | |
高数学评估焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | 0.03 (0.15) | 1.03 | [0.78, 1.37] | - | - | - | -0.19 (0.17) | 0.83 | [0.59, 1.16] |
母亲教育卷入 | 0.29 (0.17) | 1.34 | [0.96, 1.88] | - | - | - | 0.49* (0.21) | 1.63 | [1.08, 2.46] | |
高数学获得焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | 0.64* (0.27) | 1.90 | [1.13, 3.20] | -0.02 (0.21) | 0.98 | [0.65, 1.49] | - | - | - |
母亲教育卷入 | 0.17 (0.32) | 1.19 | [0.64, 2.21] | -0.03 (0.25) | 0.97 | [0.59, 1.60] | - | - | - |
表7 协变量影响下转变概率的发生比
潜在状态 | 影响因素 | 低数学焦虑组 | 高数学评估焦虑组 | 高数学获得焦虑组 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B (SE) | OR | 95% CI | B (SE) | OR | 95% CI | B (SE) | OR | 95% CI | ||
T1到T2 | ||||||||||
低数学焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | -0.49** (0.15) | 0.61 | [0.45, 0.82] | -0.23 (0.25) | 0.79 | [0.49, 1.28] |
母亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | 0.14 (0.19) | 1.16 | [0.80, 1.66] | -0.36 (0.29) | 0.70 | [0.40, 1.23] | |
高数学评估焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | -0.01 (0.16) | 0.99 | [0.72, 1.36] | - | - | - | 0.11 (0.18) | 1.11 | [0.78, 1.58] |
母亲教育卷入 | 0.38* (0.19) | 1.46 | [1.01, 2.11] | - | - | - | -0.21 (0.20) | 0.81 | [0.55, 1.21] | |
高数学获得焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | 0.15 (0.31) | 1.16 | [0.63, 2.13] | -0.24 (0.29) | 0.78 | [0.45, 1.37] | - | - | - |
母亲教育卷入 | -0.09 (0.34) | 0.92 | [0.48, 1.77] | 0.18 (0.31) | 1.20 | [0.65, 2.21] | - | - | - | |
T2到T3 | ||||||||||
低数学焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | 0.26 (0.17) | 1.29 | [0.93, 1.78] | -0.07 (0.23) | 0.93 | [0.60, 1.45] |
母亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | -0.92*** (0.19) | 0.40 | [0.27, 0.58] | -0.43 (0.29) | 0.65 | [0.37, 1.14] | |
高数学评估焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | 0.03 (0.15) | 1.03 | [0.78, 1.37] | - | - | - | -0.19 (0.17) | 0.83 | [0.59, 1.16] |
母亲教育卷入 | 0.29 (0.17) | 1.34 | [0.96, 1.88] | - | - | - | 0.49* (0.21) | 1.63 | [1.08, 2.46] | |
高数学获得焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | 0.64* (0.27) | 1.90 | [1.13, 3.20] | -0.02 (0.21) | 0.98 | [0.65, 1.49] | - | - | - |
母亲教育卷入 | 0.17 (0.32) | 1.19 | [0.64, 2.21] | -0.03 (0.25) | 0.97 | [0.59, 1.60] | - | - | - |
潜在状态 | 影响因素 | 低数学焦虑组 | 高数学评估焦虑组 | 高数学获得焦虑组 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B (SE) | OR | 95% CI | B (SE) | OR | 95% CI | B (SE) | OR | 95% CI | ||
T1-T2 | ||||||||||
低数学焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | -0.74*** (0.20) | 0.48 | [0.32, 0.70] | -0.36 (0.30) | 0.70 | [0.39, 1.25] |
母亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | 0.44 (0.24) | 1.55 | [0.96, 2.50] | -0.16 (0.35) | 0.86 | [0.43, 1.71] | |
高数学评估焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | 0.04 (0.20) | 1.04 | [0.70, 1.55] | - | - | - | 0.16 (0.21) | 1.17 | [0.77, 1.78] |
母亲教育卷入 | 0.24 (0.24) | 1.27 | [0.80, 2.01] | - | - | - | -0.15 (0.25) | 0.86 | [0.53, 1.39] | |
高数学获得焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | 0.04 (0.36) | 1.04 | [0.51, 2.11] | -0.39 (0.33) | 0.68 | [0.35, 1.30] | - | - | - |
母亲教育卷入 | -0.25 (0.39) | 0.78 | [0.36, 1.68] | 0.48 (0.38) | 1.62 | [0.77, 3.37] | - | - | - | |
T2-T3 | ||||||||||
低数学焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | 0.14 (0.21) | 1.15 | [0.76, 1.74] | 0.06 (0.26) | 1.06 | [0.64, 1.76] |
母亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | -0.88** (0.26) | 0.41 | [0.25, 0.69] | -0.36 (0.33) | 0.70 | [0.37, 1.33] | |
高数学评估焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | 0.14 (0.18) | 1.15 | [0.81, 1.64] | - | - | - | -0.15 (0.22) | 0.86 | [0.56, 1.32] |
母亲教育卷入 | 0.36 (0.22) | 1.43 | [0.93, 2.20] | - | - | - | 0.53 (0.27) | 1.69 | [1.00, 2.88] | |
高数学获得焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | 0.33 (0.30) | 1.38 | [0.76, 2.51] | -0.29 (0.26) | 0.75 | [0.45, 1.24] | - | - | - |
母亲教育卷入 | 0.56 (0.38) | 1.75 | [0.84, 3.67] | 0.10 (0.30) | 1.11 | [0.61, 1.99] | - | - | - |
表8 男生协变量影响下转变概率的发生比
潜在状态 | 影响因素 | 低数学焦虑组 | 高数学评估焦虑组 | 高数学获得焦虑组 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B (SE) | OR | 95% CI | B (SE) | OR | 95% CI | B (SE) | OR | 95% CI | ||
T1-T2 | ||||||||||
低数学焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | -0.74*** (0.20) | 0.48 | [0.32, 0.70] | -0.36 (0.30) | 0.70 | [0.39, 1.25] |
母亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | 0.44 (0.24) | 1.55 | [0.96, 2.50] | -0.16 (0.35) | 0.86 | [0.43, 1.71] | |
高数学评估焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | 0.04 (0.20) | 1.04 | [0.70, 1.55] | - | - | - | 0.16 (0.21) | 1.17 | [0.77, 1.78] |
母亲教育卷入 | 0.24 (0.24) | 1.27 | [0.80, 2.01] | - | - | - | -0.15 (0.25) | 0.86 | [0.53, 1.39] | |
高数学获得焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | 0.04 (0.36) | 1.04 | [0.51, 2.11] | -0.39 (0.33) | 0.68 | [0.35, 1.30] | - | - | - |
母亲教育卷入 | -0.25 (0.39) | 0.78 | [0.36, 1.68] | 0.48 (0.38) | 1.62 | [0.77, 3.37] | - | - | - | |
T2-T3 | ||||||||||
低数学焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | 0.14 (0.21) | 1.15 | [0.76, 1.74] | 0.06 (0.26) | 1.06 | [0.64, 1.76] |
母亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | -0.88** (0.26) | 0.41 | [0.25, 0.69] | -0.36 (0.33) | 0.70 | [0.37, 1.33] | |
高数学评估焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | 0.14 (0.18) | 1.15 | [0.81, 1.64] | - | - | - | -0.15 (0.22) | 0.86 | [0.56, 1.32] |
母亲教育卷入 | 0.36 (0.22) | 1.43 | [0.93, 2.20] | - | - | - | 0.53 (0.27) | 1.69 | [1.00, 2.88] | |
高数学获得焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | 0.33 (0.30) | 1.38 | [0.76, 2.51] | -0.29 (0.26) | 0.75 | [0.45, 1.24] | - | - | - |
母亲教育卷入 | 0.56 (0.38) | 1.75 | [0.84, 3.67] | 0.10 (0.30) | 1.11 | [0.61, 1.99] | - | - | - |
潜在状态 | 影响因素 | 低数学焦虑组 | 高数学评估焦虑组 | 高数学获得焦虑组 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B (SE) | OR | 95% CI | B (SE) | OR | 95% CI | B (SE) | OR | 95% CI | ||
T1-T2 | ||||||||||
低数学焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | -0.11 (0.25) | 0.90 | [0.55, 1.47] | 0.06 (0.46) | 1.06 | [0.43, 2.60] |
母亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | -0.31 (0.30) | 0.73 | [0.41, 1.31] | -0.80 (0.52) | 0.45 | [0.16, 1.25] | |
高数学评估焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | -0.17 (0.28) | 0.85 | [0.49, 1.47] | - | - | - | -0.10 (0.35) | 0.90 | [0.45, 1.80] |
母亲教育卷入 | 0.66* (0.32) | 1.93 | [1.03, 3.62] | - | - | - | -0.27 (0.38) | 0.76 | [0.36, 1.61] | |
高数学获得焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | 0.42 (0.63) | 1.53 | [0.45, 5.19] | 0.19 (0.57) | 1.21 | [0.40, 3.68] | - | - | - |
母亲教育卷入 | 0.18 (0.67) | 1.19 | [0.32, 4.46] | -0.45 (0.60) | 0.64 | [0.20, 2.06] | - | - | - | |
T2-T3 | ||||||||||
低数学焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | 0.47 (0.27) | 1.60 | [0.94, 2.71] | -0.43 (0.46) | 0.65 | [0.27, 1.59] |
母亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | -1.14*** (0.31) | 0.32 | [0.18, 0.58] | -0.53 (0.58) | 0.59 | [0.19, 1.83] | |
高数学评估焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | -0.16 (0.25) | 0.86 | [0.52, 1.40] | - | - | - | -0.21 (0.28) | 0.81 | [0.46, 1.41] |
母亲教育卷入 | 0.20 (0.29) | 1.22 | [0.70, 2.15] | - | - | - | 0.36 (0.33) | 1.44 | [0.75, 2.76] | |
高数学获得焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | 1.57** (0.54) | 4.79 | [1.65, 13.92] | 0.63 (0.41) | 1.87 | [0.84, 4.16] | - | - | - |
母亲教育卷入 | -0.95 (0.60) | 0.39 | [0.12, 1.26] | -0.44 (0.49) | 0.64 | [0.25, 1.67] | - | - | - |
表9 女生协变量影响下转变概率的发生比
潜在状态 | 影响因素 | 低数学焦虑组 | 高数学评估焦虑组 | 高数学获得焦虑组 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B (SE) | OR | 95% CI | B (SE) | OR | 95% CI | B (SE) | OR | 95% CI | ||
T1-T2 | ||||||||||
低数学焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | -0.11 (0.25) | 0.90 | [0.55, 1.47] | 0.06 (0.46) | 1.06 | [0.43, 2.60] |
母亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | -0.31 (0.30) | 0.73 | [0.41, 1.31] | -0.80 (0.52) | 0.45 | [0.16, 1.25] | |
高数学评估焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | -0.17 (0.28) | 0.85 | [0.49, 1.47] | - | - | - | -0.10 (0.35) | 0.90 | [0.45, 1.80] |
母亲教育卷入 | 0.66* (0.32) | 1.93 | [1.03, 3.62] | - | - | - | -0.27 (0.38) | 0.76 | [0.36, 1.61] | |
高数学获得焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | 0.42 (0.63) | 1.53 | [0.45, 5.19] | 0.19 (0.57) | 1.21 | [0.40, 3.68] | - | - | - |
母亲教育卷入 | 0.18 (0.67) | 1.19 | [0.32, 4.46] | -0.45 (0.60) | 0.64 | [0.20, 2.06] | - | - | - | |
T2-T3 | ||||||||||
低数学焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | 0.47 (0.27) | 1.60 | [0.94, 2.71] | -0.43 (0.46) | 0.65 | [0.27, 1.59] |
母亲教育卷入 | - | - | - | -1.14*** (0.31) | 0.32 | [0.18, 0.58] | -0.53 (0.58) | 0.59 | [0.19, 1.83] | |
高数学评估焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | -0.16 (0.25) | 0.86 | [0.52, 1.40] | - | - | - | -0.21 (0.28) | 0.81 | [0.46, 1.41] |
母亲教育卷入 | 0.20 (0.29) | 1.22 | [0.70, 2.15] | - | - | - | 0.36 (0.33) | 1.44 | [0.75, 2.76] | |
高数学获得焦虑组 | 父亲教育卷入 | 1.57** (0.54) | 4.79 | [1.65, 13.92] | 0.63 (0.41) | 1.87 | [0.84, 4.16] | - | - | - |
母亲教育卷入 | -0.95 (0.60) | 0.39 | [0.12, 1.26] | -0.44 (0.49) | 0.64 | [0.25, 1.67] | - | - | - |
[1] | Bai, X. W., & Chen, Y. W. (2004). Measurement equivalence: Conception and test conditions. Advances in Psychological Science, 12(2), 231-239. |
[ 白新文, 陈毅文. (2004). 测量等价性的概念及其判定条件. 心理科学进展, 12(2), 231-239.] | |
[2] |
Barger, M. M., Kim, E. M., Kuncel, N. R., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2019). The relation between parents' involvement in children's schooling and children's adjustment: A meta- analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 145(9), 855-980.
doi: 10.1037/bul0000201 URL |
[3] |
Barroso, C., Ganley, C. M., McGraw, A. L., Geer, E. A., Hart, S. A., & Daucourt, M. C. (2020). A meta-analysis of the relation between math anxiety and math achievement. Psychological Bulletin. 147(2), 134-168.
doi: 10.1037/bul0000307 URL |
[4] |
Bretherton, I. (2010). Fathers in attachment theory and research: A review. Early Child Development and Care, 180(1-2), 9-23.
doi: 10.1080/03004430903414646 URL |
[5] | Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press. |
[6] |
Cheung, S. S., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2011). Parents’ involvement in children’s learning in the United States and China: Implications for children’s academic and emotional adjustment. Child Development, 82(3), 932-950.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.2011.82.issue-3 URL |
[7] |
Ching, H. H., Wu, H. X., & Chen, T. T. (2021). Maternal achievement-oriented psychological control: Implications for adolescent academic contingent self-esteem and mathematics anxiety. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 45(3), 193-203.
doi: 10.1177/0165025420981638 URL |
[8] | Chiu, L., & Henry, L. L. (1990). Development and validation of the mathematics anxiety scale for children. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development, 23(3), 121-127. |
[9] | Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. |
[10] |
Del Rio, M. F., Susperreguy, M. I., Strasser, K., & Salinas, V. (2017). Distinct influences of mothers and fathers on kindergartners' numeracy performance: The role of math anxiety, home numeracy practices, and numeracy expectations. Early Education and Development, 28(8), 939-955.
doi: 10.1080/10409289.2017.1331662 URL |
[11] |
Demirtaş, A. S., & Uygun-Eryurt, T. (2020). Attachment to parents and math anxiety in early adolescence: Hope and perceived school climate as mediators. Current Psychological Research. doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-00964-1
doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-00964-1 |
[12] |
Devine, A., Fawcett, K., Szücs, D., & Dowker, A. (2012). Gender differences in mathematics anxiety and the relation to mathematics performance while controlling for test anxiety. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 8, 33. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-8-33
doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-8-33 pmid: 22769743 |
[13] |
DiStefano, M., O’Brien, B., Storozuk, A., Ramirez, G., & Maloney, E. A. (2020). Exploring math anxious parents’ emotional experience surrounding math homework-help. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 101526. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101526
doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101526 URL |
[14] |
Dowker, A., Sarkar, A., & Looi, C. Y. (2016). Mathematics anxiety: What have we learned in 60 years? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 508. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00508
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00508 pmid: 27199789 |
[15] |
Fan, X., Hambleton, R. K., & Zhang, M. (2019). Profiles of mathematics anxiety among 15-year-old students: A cross- cultural study using multi-group latent profile analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1217. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01217
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01217 URL |
[16] | Geng, L. N., & Chen, Y. H. (2005). The relationship between children’s mathematics anxiety and add-and-subtract cognitive strategy selection and implement. Psychological Development and Education, 21(4), 24-27. |
[ 耿柳娜, 陈英和. (2005). 数学焦虑对儿童加减法认知策略选择和执行的影响. 心理发展与教育, 21(4), 24-27.] | |
[17] |
Harari, R. R., Vukovic, R. K., & Bailey, S. P. (2013). Mathematics anxiety in young children: An exploratory study. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(4), 538-555.
doi: 10.1080/00220973.2012.727888 URL |
[18] |
Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 33-46.
doi: 10.2307/749455 URL |
[19] |
Hickendorff, M., Edelsbrunner, P. A., McMullen, J., Schneider, M., & Trezise, K. (2018). Informative tools for characterizing individual differences in learning: Latent class, latent profile, and latent transition analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 66, 4-15.
doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.001 URL |
[20] |
Hong, S., Yoo, S.-K., You, S., & Wu, C.-C. (2010). The reciprocal relationship between parental involvement and mathematics achievement: Autoregressive cross-lagged modeling. Journal of Experimental Education, 78(4), 419-439.
doi: 10.1080/00220970903292926 URL |
[21] |
Hopko, D. R., Mahadevan, R., Bare, R. L., & Hunt, M. A. (2003). The abbreviated math anxiety scale (AMAS): Construction, validity, and reliability. Assessment, 10(2), 178-182.
doi: 10.1177/1073191103010002008 URL |
[22] |
Jung, T., & Wickrama, A. S. (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 302-317.
doi: 10.1111/spco.2008.2.issue-1 URL |
[23] | Lerner, R. M. (2002). Concepts and theories of human development (3rd ed). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |
[24] |
Li, X., Han, M., Cohen, G. L., & Markus, H. R. (2021). Passion matters but not equally everywhere: Predicting achievement from interest, enjoyment, and efficacy in 59 societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(11), e2016964118.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2016964118 URL |
[25] |
Lital, D. C., & Orly, R. (2017). Mothers, intrinsic math motivation, arithmetic skills, and math anxiety in elementary school. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1939. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01939
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01939 |
[26] |
Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. (2007). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychology Methods, 10(1), 21-39.
doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.21 URL |
[27] | Luo, L., Wu, Y. F., & Wei, W. (2014). Properties of parent- involved education with high quality. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences), (1), 53-60. |
[ 罗良, 吴艺方, 韦唯. (2014). 高质量父母教育卷入的特征. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 53-60.] | |
[28] |
Ma, M., Li, D., & Zhang, L. (2021). Longitudinal prediction of children's math anxiety from parent-child relationships. Learning and Individual Differences, 88(4), 102016.
doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102016 URL |
[29] |
Maloney, E. A., Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2015). Intergenerational effects of parents' math anxiety on children's math achievement and anxiety. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1480-1488.
doi: 10.1177/0956797615592630 pmid: 26253552 |
[30] |
McKenna, J. S., & Nickols, S. Y. (1988). Planning for retirement security: What helps or hinders women in the middle years? Home Economics Research Journal, 17(2), 153-164.
doi: 10.1177/1077727X8801700204 URL |
[31] | Nylund, K. L. (2007). Latent transition analysis: Modeling extensions and an application to peer victimization (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles. |
[32] | OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving, and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing. |
[33] |
Rolison, J. J., Morsanyi, K., & Peters, E. (2020). Understanding health risk comprehension: The role of math anxiety, subjective numeracy, and objective numeracy. Medical Decision Making, 40(2), 222-234.
doi: 10.1177/0272989X20904725 URL |
[34] |
Rubinsten, O., Marciano, H., Levy, H. E., & Cohen, L. D. (2018). A framework for studying the heterogeneity of risk factors in math anxiety. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 291. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00291
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00291 pmid: 30559654 |
[35] | Sarason, I. G. (1978). Test anxiety scale:Concept and research. In C. D. Spielberger & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Stress and anxiety: Vol. 5 (pp. 193-216). Washington D. C: Hemisphere Publishing Corp. |
[36] |
Si, J. W., Xu, Y. L., Feng, H. M., Xu, X. H., & Zhou, C. (2014). Differences of arithmetic strategy use in adults with different math anxieties: An ERP study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(12), 1835-1849.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.01835 URL |
[ 司继伟, 徐艳丽, 封洪敏, 许晓华, 周超. (2014). 不同数学焦虑成人的算术策略运用差异:ERP研究. 心理学报, 46(12), 1835-1849.] | |
[37] |
Szczygieł, M. (2020). When does math anxiety in parents and teachers predict math anxiety and math achievement in elementary school children? The role of gender and grade year. Social Psychology of Education, 23(4), 1023-1054.
doi: 10.1007/s11218-020-09570-2 URL |
[38] |
Tomasetto, C., Mirisola, A., Galdi, S., & Cadinu, M. (2015). Parents’ math-gender stereotypes, children’s self-perception of ability, and children’s appraisal of parents’ evaluations in 6-year-olds. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 186-198.
doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.06.007 URL |
[39] |
Tomasetto, C., Morsanyi, K., Guardabassi, V., & O’Connor, P. A. (2021). Math anxiety interferes with learning novel mathematics contents in early elementary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(2), 315-329.
doi: 10.1037/edu0000602 URL |
[40] |
Vanbinst, K., Bellon, E., & Dowker, A. (2020). Mathematics anxiety: An intergenerational approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01648
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01648 pmid: 32793047 |
[41] |
Vukovic, R. K., Roberts, S. O., & Wright, G. L. (2013). From parental involvement to children's mathematical performance: The role of mathematics anxiety. Early Education and Development, 24(4), 446-467.
doi: 10.1080/10409289.2012.693430 URL |
[42] | Wang, B. Y., Zhang, M. Q., Zhang, J. T., & Hu, J. (2015). Describing the stage process of individual through transition matrix: Latent transition model. Psychological Research, 8(4), 36-43. |
[ 王碧瑶, 张敏强, 张洁婷, 胡俊. (2015). 基于转变矩阵描述的个体阶段性发展:潜在转变模型. 心理研究, 8(4), 36-43.] | |
[43] | Wang, C. K. (2001). Reliability and validity of test anxiety scale-Chinese version. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 15(2), 96-97. |
[ 王才康. (2001). 考试焦虑量表在大学生中的测试报告. 中国心理卫生杂志, 15(2), 96-97.] | |
[44] |
Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119-140.
doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x URL |
[45] |
Wang, Z., Oh, W., Malanchini, M., & Borriello, G. A. (2020). The developmental trajectories of mathematics anxiety: Cognitive, personality, and environmental correlates. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101876. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101876
doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101876 URL |
[46] |
Wang, Z., Shakeshaft, N., Schofield, K., & Malanchini, M. (2018). Anxiety is not enough to drive me away: A latent profile analysis on math anxiety and math motivation. PLoS ONE, 13(2), e0192072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192072
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192072 URL |
[47] | Wu, Y. F., Hang, X. H., Wei, W., & Luo, L. (2013). Theoretical model construction and testing of parental involvement in primary school children education. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences), (1), 61-69. |
[ 吴艺方, 韩秀华, 韦唯, 罗良. (2013). 小学生父母教育卷入行为理论模型的建构与验证. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 61-69.] | |
[48] |
Xiao, F., & Sun, L. (2021). Students' motivation and affection profiles and their relation to mathematics achievement, persistence, and behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 533593. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.533593
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.533593 URL |
[49] | Zhang, W. X., & Chen, G. H. (2009). Developmental contextualism: An instance of development system theories. Advances in Psychological Science, 17(4), 736-744. |
[ 张文新, 陈光辉. (2009). 发展情境论--一种新的发展系统理论. 心理科学进展, 17(4), 736-744.] | |
[50] | Zhou, H., & Long, L. R. (2004). Statistical remedies for common method biases. Advances in Psychological Science, 12(6), 942-950. |
[ 周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.] |
[1] | 陈诗韵, 屈笛扬, 卜禾, 梁凯欣, 张沛超, 迟新丽. 迷“网”的少年:网瘾风险青少年的症状演化*[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(9): 1465-1476. |
[2] | 崔芳, 廖心明, 杨嘉望, 刘洁. 数学焦虑影响数学概念知识加工的脑机制:静息态功能磁共振研究[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(6): 968-977. |
[3] | 祝孝亮, 赵鑫. 执行功能在不同年级儿童数学能力中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(5): 696-710. |
[4] | 陈必忠, 黄璇, 牛更枫, 孙晓军, 蔡志慧. 学步期至青年期社交焦虑的发展轨迹和稳定性:一项基于纵向研究的三水平元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(10): 1637-1652. |
[5] | 侯晴晴, 郭明宇, 王玲晓, 吕辉, 常淑敏. 学校资源与早期青少年心理社会适应的关系:一项潜在转变分析[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(8): 917-930. |
[6] | 廖友国, 陈建文, 张妍, 彭聪. 儿童青少年同伴侵害与内化问题的双向关系: 纵向研究的元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(7): 828-849. |
[7] | 梁一鸣, 杨璐溪, 席居哲, 刘正奎. 睡眠问题在创伤后应激障碍各症状间的独特作用:基于交叉滞后网络分析模型[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(10): 1206-1215. |
[8] | 刘洁, 李瑾琪, 申超然, 胡小惠, 赵庭浩, 关青, 罗跃嘉. 数学焦虑个体近似数量加工的神经机制:一项EEG研究[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(8): 958-970. |
[9] | 赵鑫, 李红利, 金戈, 李世峰, 周爱保, 梁文佳, 郭红霞, 蔡亚亚. 语音记忆和中央执行功能在不同年级儿童解码和语言理解中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(4): 469-484. |
[10] | 梁一鸣, 郑昊, 刘正奎. 震后儿童创伤后应激障碍的症状网络演化[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(11): 1301-1312. |
[11] | 陈红君, 赵英, 伍新春, 孙鹏, 谢瑞波, 冯杰. 小学儿童词汇知识与阅读理解的关系:交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(8): 924-934. |
[12] | 张明亮, 司继伟, 杨伟星, 邢淑芬, 李红霞, 张佳佳. BDNF基因rs6265多态性与父母教育卷入对小学儿童基本数学能力的交互作用 *[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 1007-1017. |
[13] | 吴国婷, 张敏强, 倪雨菡, 杨亚威, 漆成明, 吴健星. 老年人孤独感及其影响因素的潜在转变分析 *[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 1061-1070. |
[14] | 司继伟;徐艳丽;封洪敏;许晓华;周超. 不同数学焦虑成人的算术策略运用差异:ERP研究[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(12): 1835-1849. |
[15] | Roger A. Dixon, Cindy M. de Frias. 老年人记忆补偿的长期稳定性和变异性:来自维多利亚纵向研究的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(11): 1091-1101. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||