ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (9): 1683-1697.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2026.1683 cstr: 32110.14.2026.1683

• “压力、韧性与健康”专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

以柔克刚:自我关怀与韧性关系的三水平元分析

李忻奕, 贺嘉玺, 肖涵, 刘筱笛, 周广玉   

  1. 北京大学心理与认知科学学院; 生物与机器智能教育部重点实验室, 北京 100871
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-30 发布日期:2026-07-29 出版日期:2026-09-25
  • 通讯作者: 周广玉, E-mail: gyzhou@pku.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目(21BSH158)与国家自然科学基金(32271136)资助

When softness builds strength: A three-level meta-analysis of the relationship between self-compassion and resilience

LI Xinyi, HE jiaxi, XIAO Han, LIU Xiaodi, ZHOU Guangyu   

  1. School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; Key Laboratory of Machine Perception (Ministry of Education), Beijing 100871, China
  • Received:2025-08-30 Online:2026-07-29 Published:2026-09-25

摘要: 自我关怀作为一种基于接纳与慈悲的自我相处之道, 可能是潜在的韧性保护性因素。研究采用三水平元分析探究自我关怀与韧性的关系及其异质性。通过系统性检索与筛选, 共纳入124篇文献、128个样本与296个效应量, 总样本量为44, 775。结果表明, 自我关怀与韧性显著正相关(r = 0.46), 且自我关怀干预对韧性有显著促进作用(g = 0.49)。调节效应分析发现, 自我关怀与韧性的关系受人群特征(健康状况)、情境因素(逆境与文化背景)、韧性操作化方式与研究设计的影响。不同自我关怀类型与成分对韧性的效应存在差异:非自我关怀式反应与韧性的关系相对更强; 普遍人性感与韧性的关系较弱。研究建构并检验了自我关怀促进韧性的情感调节模型, 支持将自我关怀作为韧性干预的核心靶点之一, 并为开展精准干预与本土化干预提供了实践启示。

关键词: 自我关怀, 韧性, 三水平元分析, 文化, 情感调节

Abstract: Stressors are pervasive in contemporary society and contribute to increased vulnerability to stress-related disorders. Strengthening resilience is crucial for reducing health risks. Among protective factors, self-compassion has been proposed as a promising resource for promoting resilience. This argument is supported by the tripartite model of affect regulation, which posits that self-compassion activates the soothing system and down-regulates the threat system. This affect regulation process is considered a central mechanism underlying resilience within the affect regulation framework of psychological resilience. However, empirical findings on the relationship between self-compassion and resilience remain scattered and inconsistent, with some studies reporting robust associations, while others showing weak or nonsignificant results. The inconsistency raises questions regarding the overall strength of this association and the boundary conditions. To address this gap, the present meta-analysis aimed to quantitatively synthesize both correlational and causal evidence on the relationship between self-compassion and resilience, and to examine potential moderators related to population characteristics, contextual factors, operationalization of resilience, self-compassion types and components, and study design, guided by the systemic model of resilience.
A systematic literature search was conducted across six databases: CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), Web of Science, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Scopus, and CINAHL. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and extracted data. A three-level meta-analysis was performed in R 4.2.2 to estimate pooled effect sizes and examine moderators. Study quality was assessed using the JBI critical appraisal tools. Publication bias was evaluated using Egger-MLMA regression and the fail-safe number, and sensitivity analyses were conducted with multiple diagnostics, including studentized deleted residuals, Cook’s distance, and DFBETAS. Results indicated a low risk of publication bias and robust findings.
A total of 124 studies, comprising 128 independent samples and 296 effect sizes from 44, 775 participants, were included in the meta-analyses. Self-compassion was positively correlated with resilience (r = 0.46, 95% CI [0.42, 0.49]), and self-compassion interventions significantly enhanced resilience (Hedges’ g = 0.49, 95% CI [0.32, 0.65]). Moderator analyses revealed that the relationship between self-compassion and resilience was influenced by population characteristics (health status), contextual factors (adversity types, specific adverse events, and cultural backgrounds), resilience operationalization (orientation, measurement and domains of resilient outcomes), and intervention formats. Specifically, stronger associations were observed in cultural contexts more distant from Chinese culture, under social adversity (particularly stigma and interpersonal violence), and when resilience was conceptualized as a trait and assessed as psychological or overall resilience. Different types and components of self-compassion exhibited differential associations with resilience: uncompassionate self-responding was more strongly associated with resilience than compassionate self-responding, whereas common humanity showed the weakest association among the six components. In intervention samples, effects were more pronounced among individuals at higher health risk and when the intervention was delivered in blended online-offline formats. Age, gender, and study design did not moderate their relationship.
The findings support the proposed affect-regulation model of self-compassion in promoting resilience (Affect-Regulation Model, ARM), advancing theoretical understanding of the relationship between self-compassion and resilience. Practically, the results provide evidence for targeting self-compassion in resilience-enhancing interventions, highlight the need for targeted and context-sensitive approaches, particularly for vulnerable populations and under social adversity, and underscore the importance of culturally adapted interventions. Future research should give greater consideration to different operationalizations of resilience, its multidimensional nature, and more fine-grained moderators.

Key words: self-compassion, resilience, three-level meta-analysis, culture, affect regulation