绿色助推

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00814

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

我们人类当前的生活方式不是可持续的。提升可持续性的途径之一是发展更绿色的科学技术, 另一种补充性途径是改变人们的态度、习惯和行为。在本文中, 我们讨论了6种心理技术, 其宗旨是推动或助推(nudge)人们做出更环保的选择和行为。这些心理技术涵盖范围非常广泛, 有些可以远程使用, 如在通知公告中建构沟通信息, 有些则涉及对人们的决策情境做出的改变。因此, 本综述关乎到各行业从业人员, 如市场营销人员、政策制定者、消费者代表等。对于每项心理技术, 我们讨论了其认知和(或)情绪的理论性基础。此外, 我们探讨了目前文献中存在的空白, 并提出了可填补这些空白的未来研究方向。

关键词: 决策, 助推, 亲环境决策, 情境效应

Abstract:

Our current lifestyle is not sustainable. One way to increase sustainability is by developing greener technologies. Another, complementary way, is by altering people’s attitudes, habits, and behaviors. Here we discuss six techniques that aim to gently push or nudge people towards more pro-environmental choices and behaviors. These techniques range from ones that can be applied from a distance, e.g., techniques which could inform the construction of communication messages, to ones that involve changes in the context where the choice takes place. Therefore, the present review can be of interest to practitioners such as marketers, policymakers, and consumer representatives. For each technique, we discuss its theorized cognitive and/or emotional underpinnings. Furthermore, we identify gaps in the literature and ways in which future research could fill these gaps.

Key words: decision-making, nudging, pro-environmental decisions, context effects

中图分类号:

B849:C91

Nicolao Bonini, Constantinos Hadjichristidis, Michele Graffeo. (2018). 绿色助推. 心理学报, 50(8), 814-826.

Nicolao Bonini, Constantinos Hadjichristidis, Michele Graffeo. (2018). Green nudging. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50(8), 814-826.

参考文献 46

[1]	Bhargava S., &Loewenstein G. , (2015). Behavioral economics and public policy 102: Beyond Nudging. American Economic Review, 105, 396-401, doi: 10.1257/ aer.p20151049. doi: 10.1257/aer.p20151049 URL
[2]	Bonini N., Biel A., Gärling T., & Karlsson N . (2002). Influencing what the money is perceived to be worth: Framing and priming in contingent valuation studies. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 655-663.
[3]	Bonini N., Graffeo M., Hadjichristidis C., & Perrotta V . (2015). The effects of incidental scents in the evaluation of environmental goods: The role of congruity. PsyCh Journal, 4( 2), 66-73, doi: 10.1002/pchj.76. doi: 10.1002/pchj.76 URL pmid: 26261906
[4]	Bonini N., Ritov I., & Graffeo M . (2008). When does a referent public problem affect financial and political support for public action? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 169-182. doi: 10.1002/bdm.580 URL
[5]	Caldwell-Harris C.L . (2015). Emotionality differences between a native and foreign language: Implications for everyday life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 214-219, doi: 10.1177/0963721414566268. doi: 10.1177/0963721414566268 URL
[6]	Camerer C., Issacharoff S., Loewenstein G., O'Donoghue T., & Rabin M . (2003). Regulation for conservatives: Behavioral economics and the case for "asymmetric paternalism". University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151( 3), 1211-1254. doi: 10.2307/3312889 URL
[7]	Cialdini R. B., Reno R. R., & Kallgren C. A . (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58( 6), 1015-1026, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015.
[8]	Cialdini R.B., &Trost M.R, . (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 151-192). Boston, MA: McGraw- Hill.
[9]	Costa A., Foucart A., Hayakawa S., Aparici M., Apesteguia J., Heafner J., & Keysar B . (2014). Your morals depend on language. PLoS One, 9, e94842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094842 URL pmid: 24760073
[10]	Costa A., Vives M.-L., & Corey J. D . (2017). On language processing shaping decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26( 2), 146-151, doi: 10.1177/ 0963721416680263. doi: 10.1177/0963721416680263 URL
[11]	Dorofeeva K., Bonini N., & Hadjichristidis C . (2017). Visual priming with pictures of nature promotes recycling behaviour. Unpublished manuscript .
[12]	Fischer C.., (2008). Feedback on household electricity consumption: A tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency, 1, 79-104. doi: 10.1007/s12053-008-9009-7 URL
[13]	Geipel J., Hadjichristidis C., & Kleese A.-K. (2018). Barriers to sustainable consumption attenuated by foreign language use. Nature Sustainability, 1, 31-33. doi: 10.1038/s41893- 017-0005-9 doi: 10.1038/s41893-017-0005-9 URL
[14]	Geipel J., Hadjichristidis C., & Surian L . (2015 a). How foreign language shapes moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.02.001 URL
[15]	Geipel J., Hadjichristidis C., & Surian L . (2015 b). The foreign language effect on moral judgment: The role of emotions and norms. PLoS One, 10, e0131529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131529 URL pmid: 4503530
[16]	Geipel J., Hadjichristidis C., & Surian L . (2016). Foreign language affects the contribution of intentions and outcomes to moral judgment. Cognition, 154, 34-39.
[17]	Graffeo M., Ritov I., Bonini N., & Hadjichristidis C . (2015). To make people save energy tell them what others do but also who they are: A preliminary study. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1287, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01287. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01287 URL pmid: 4551825
[18]	Hadjichristidis C., Geipel J., & Savadori L . (2015). The effect of foreign language in judgments of risk and benefit: The role of affect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21( 2), 117-129. doi: 10.1037/xap0000044 URL pmid: 25893443
[19]	Hadjichristidis C., Geipel J., & Surian L . (2017). How foreign language affects decisions: Rethinking the brain- drain model. Journal of International Business Studies,48( 5), 645-651. doi: 10.1057/s41267-016-0040-1. doi: 10.1057/s41267-016-0040-1 URL
[20]	Halpern D.., (2015). Inside the nudge unit: How small changes can make a big difference.London, UK: WH Allen
[21]	Hayakawa S., Costa A., Foucart A., & Keysar B . (2016). Using a foreign language changes our choices. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20( 11), 791-793, doi: 10.1016/j.tics. 2016.08.004. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.004 URL pmid: 27600315
[22]	Hornstein H. A., Fisch E., & Holmes M . (1968). Influence of a model's feeling about his behavior and his relevance as a comparison other on observers' helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 222-226.
[23]	Kahneman D.., (2011). Thinking, fast and slow.New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
[24]	Kahneman D., &Ritov I. , (1994). Determinants of stated willingness to pay for public goods: A study in the headline method. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 9( 1), 5-37. doi: 10.1007/BF01073401 URL
[25]	Kahneman D., Ritov I., & Schkade D . (1999). Economic preferences or attitude expressions?: An analysis of dollar responses to public issues. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19 ( 1-3), 203-235. doi: 10.1023/A:1007835629236 URL
[26]	Kahneman D., &Tversky A. , (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292.
[27]	Keysar B., Hayakawa S. L., & An S. G . (2012). The foreign-language effect: Thinking in a foreign tongue reduces decision biases. Psychological Science, 23( 6), 661-668. doi: 10.1177/0956797611432178 URL pmid: 22517192
[28]	Lichtenstein S. , & Slovic, P. (Eds).(2006) . The construction of preference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[29]	Liljenquist K., Zhong C. B., & Galinsky A. D . (2010). The smell of virtue: Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity. Psychological Science, 21( 3), 381-383. doi: 10.1177/0956797610361426 doi: 10.1177/0956797610361426 URL pmid: 2042407420
[30]	Oppenheimer D. M. , & Olivola, C. Y. (Eds). (2010) . The science of giving: Experimental approaches to the study of charity New York: Psychology Press Experimental approaches to the study of charity .New York: Psychology Press.
[31]	Pichert D., &Katsikopoulos K.V . (2008). Green defaults: Information presentation and pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.004 URL
[32]	Puntoni S., de Langhe B., & van Osselaer S. M. J.., ., (2009). Bilingualism and the emotional intensity of advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research, 35( 6), 1012-1025. doi: 10.1086/595022 URL
[33]	, , Ritov I.., Baron J. , (1992). Status-quo and omission biases. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5( 1), 49-61. doi: 10.1007/BF00208786 URL
[34]	Ritov I, & Kahneman D.. , (1997). How people value the environment: Attitudes versus economic values In M H Bazerman, D M Messick, A E Tenbrunsel, & K A Wade-Benzoni (Eds), Environment, ethics, and behavior: The psychology of environmental valuation and degradation (pp 33-51) San Francisco, CA, US: The New Lexington Press/Jossey-Bass Inc Attitudes versus economic values. In M. H. Bazerman, D. M. Messick, A. E. Tenbrunsel, & K. A. Wade-Benzoni (Eds.), Environment, ethics, and behavior: The psychology of environmental valuation and degradation (pp. 33-51) . San Francisco, CA, US:The New Lexington Press/Jossey-Bass Inc.
[35]	Rozin P., Haddad B., Nemeroff C., & Slovic P . (2015). Psychological aspects of the rejection of recycled water: Contamination, purification and disgust. Judgment and Decision Making, 10( 1), 50-63.
[36]	Rutgers. (2017). Printing. Retrieved June 16, 2017, from 2017). .
[37]	Schultz P. W., Nolan J. M., Cialdini R. B., Goldstein N. J., & Griskevicius V . (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18( 5), 429-434.
[38]	Shafir E., Simonson I., & Tversky A . (1993). Reason-based choice. Cognition, 49, 11-36.
[39]	Sugden R (2005). Anomalies and stated preference techniques: A framework for a discussion of coping strategies. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32, 1-12.
[40]	Sunstein C.R . (2014). Nudging: A very short guide. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37, 583-588. doi: 10.1007/s10603-014-9273-1 URL
[41]	Teachman B. A., Norton M. I., & Spellman B. A . (2015). Memos to the president from a "Council of Psychological Science Advisers". Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10( 6), 697-700. doi: 10.1177/1745691615605829 doi: 10.1177/1745691615605829 URL pmid: 26581720
[42]	Thaler R.H., & Sunstein, C. R . (2003). Libertarian paternalism. American Economic Review, 93, 175-179.
[43]	Thaler R. H, & Sunstein C. R.. . (2008). Nudge:Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness New Haven, CT: Yale University Press Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven , CT: Yale University Press.
[44]	Turley L.W., & Milliman, R. E . (2000). Atmospheric effects on shopping behavior: A review of the experimental evidence. Journal of Business Research, 49, 193-211. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00010-7 doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00010-7 URL
[45]	Wilson J.Q., & Kelling, G. L . (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly, 249, 29-38.
[46]	Zimbardo P.G . (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 17, 237-307.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

2886

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	203	0	0	2683

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	2007	879
比例	70%	30%

摘要

1669

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	1669

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	1632	37
比例	98%	2%

绿色助推

Green nudging

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

English Version

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 46

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李春好, 刘荣媛, 刘远豪. 经典和对偶共结果效应对前景集结果区间的依赖性：基于概率权重的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(3): 398-414.
[2]	陆嘉琦, 李雨斯, 何贵兵. 双相障碍患者的风险决策偏好：来自三水平元分析的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(1): 100-124.
[3]	赵远婕, 莫子川, 马京晶. 互联网“捐赠箱”效应：增加“捐赠箱”对个体互联网捐赠意愿的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(9): 1190-1209.
[4]	刘梦颖, 蒋婧怡, 杨依琳, 江波, 黄建平. 古典美还是表现美：摆盘美学影响健康饮食决策的计算与神经机制[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(8): 1061-1075.
[5]	辛自强, 王鲁晓, 李越. 基金投资决策中老手与新手的信息加工差异及干预[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(6): 799-813.
[6]	张南, 曹沛伶, 李宁, 孙晓敏, 乔志宏, 赵精武. 法官工作时间贫困感的前因及其司法决策后果的质性探究[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(6): 814-830.
[7]	王碧瑶, 陈晨, 胡晓斐, 王迪, 李宝林. 视觉时距知觉序列依赖效应的空间迁移性[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(4): 394-411.
[8]	童廷婷, 白幼玲, 冯廷勇. 情绪调节改善拖延行为的认知机制：任务厌恶中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(4): 458-468.
[9]	邱天, 江南, 陆静怡. 切忌班门弄斧?低估在评价者擅长领域展现能力的好处[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(5): 766-780.
[10]	卓利楠, 曾祥玉, 吴冰, 牛荣荣, 于萍, 王玮文. 内侧前额皮层−伏隔核环路在决策冲动中的作用：基于动物模型的研究[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(4): 556-571.
[11]	刘洪志, 杨钘兰, 李秋月, 魏子晗. 跨期决策中的维度差异偏好：眼动证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(4): 612-625.
[12]	胡馨允, 沈悦, 戴俊毅. 系列决策任务中的策略转换：来自爱荷华赌博任务的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(11): 1793-1805.
[13]	李梅, 李琎, 张冠斐, 钟毅平, 李红. 承诺水平与社会距离对信任投资的影响：来自行为与ERPs的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(11): 1859-1871.
[14]	孙庆洲, 黄靖茹, 虞晓芬, 高倾德. 授人以鱼还是授人以渔?高、低社会阶层的捐助行为差异[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(10): 1677-1695.
[15]	张宝山, 金豆, 马梦佳, 徐冉. 消极刻板印象对老年人医疗决策的影响及归因偏差的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(8): 951-963.