大学生性别角色观的差异

心理学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (05): 658-664.

大学生性别角色观的差异

王道阳,张更立,姚本先

安徽师范大学心理学系，芜湖 241000

收稿日期:2004-12-13 修回日期:1900-01-01 发布日期:2005-09-30 出版日期:2005-09-30
通讯作者: 王道阳

THE DIFFERENCE OF THE NOTION FORSEX ROLES AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS

Wang Daoyang, Zhang Gengli, Yao Benxian

Department of psychology, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241000, China

Received:2004-12-13 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2005-09-30 Published:2005-09-30
Contact: Wang Daoyang

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 运用问卷调查法，结合人格特质词分类法，对140名大学本科新生的性别角色观进行了研究。发现：（1）男女大学生都把勇敢和善良分别放在男女性别角色正价特质的第一位；虚伪和自私分别放在男女性别角色负价特质的第一位。（2）男女大学生在善良是男女性别角色共有正价特质，负责、真诚、稳重和善良是男性角色正价特质，温柔与真诚是女性角色正价特质的重要性认识等方面有显著性的性别差异。在男生认为的男性角色的主要正价特质中女生只认为勇敢、坚强、真诚、稳重、负责是男性角色的主要正价特质。男生更认为温柔是女性角色的正价特质，女生更认为真诚是女性角色的正价特质。（3）男女生都认为势利、自私、虚伪、刻薄、饶舌是女性角色的主要负价特质，但男生把势利是放在女性角色负价特质的第一位，女生把自私放在女性角色负价特质的第一位；男女生都认为势利、自负、自私、粗鲁是男性角色的主要负价特质，但女生比男生更认为自负与懦弱是男性角色的主要负价特质，男生认为势利比自负更是男性角色的主要负价特质。

关键词: 大学生, 性别角色, 人格特质, 刻板印象

Abstract: Employing the questionnaire method and the word-grouping method for personalitical traits, have carried on research to 140 universities of undergraduate course new students' sex role's views. Findings showed that: (1) University students of men and women all place being bravely and kindheartedly on the primary importance of the specialties of positive price of sex roles of men and women; False selfish to place role, sex of men and women, on shoulder primary importance, price of speciality respectively. (2) Men and women university student in kindhearted to own positive price speciality in common role, sex of men and women, responsible for, it is male role positive price speciality to be sincere calm and steady kindhearted, it is positive price importance person who know respect of speciality, role of women, have gender differences of significance to be gentle and sincere. Girl student think brave strong sincere calm and steady it responsible for to be male main positive price specialitying of role only among male main positive price speciality of role that boy student think. Boy students think gentle positive price speciality, women of role, girl students think sincere positive price speciality, women of role even more even more. (3) Man girl student think snobbish selfish false unkind too talkative women role mainly shoulder the speciality of prices, but the boy student places being snobbish on the primary importance where the women role shoulders the speciality of prices, girl students place being selfish on women role's shouldering the primary importance of the speciality of prices; It is shouldering the speciality of prices mainly of male role that the man girl students all think it snobbish, conceited, selfish, rough, but girl student think than boy student conceited and cowardly to shoulder price speciality mainly male role even more, boy students think snobbish than mainly shouldering the speciality of prices of male role even more.

Key words: College Students, Sex-roles, Personalitical Traits, Stereotype

中图分类号:

B844

王道阳,张更立,姚本先. (2005). 大学生性别角色观的差异. 心理学报, 37(05), 658-664.

Wang Daoyang, Zhang Gengli, Yao Benxian. (2005). THE DIFFERENCE OF THE NOTION FORSEX ROLES AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS. , 37(05), 658-664.

[1]	董天天, 徐璐璐, 贺雯. 积极总是好的吗?积极元刻板印象对工作记忆的影响及其机制[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(8): 1344-1357.
[2]	兰泽波, 郭梅华, 姜琨, 吴俊杰, 闫国利. 听障大学生词汇识别过程的特异性：语言经验和阅读能力的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(6): 954-967.
[3]	张宝山, 金豆, 马梦佳, 徐冉. 消极刻板印象对老年人医疗决策的影响及归因偏差的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(8): 951-963.
[4]	陈莉, 石晓柯, 李维娜, 胡妍. 基于不同冲突水平的认知控制对性别刻板印象表达的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(6): 628-645.
[5]	王铭, 孙启武, 柳静, 任志洪, 江光荣. PTSD易感性人格特质、工作记忆能力和创伤期间认知加工对模拟创伤闪回的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(2): 168-181.
[6]	佐斌, 戴月娥, 温芳芳, 高佳, 谢志杰, 何赛飞. 人如其食：食物性别刻板印象及对人物评价的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(3): 259-272.
[7]	李依蔓, 刘程, 庄恺祥, 霍腾宾, 徐鹏飞, 罗跃嘉, 邱江. 人格特质及脑功能连接对社交网络的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(12): 1335-1347.
[8]	徐冉, 张宝山, 林瑶. 家人情感卷入对老年自我刻板印象的影响：基于潜变量增长模型的分析[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(11): 1215-1227.
[9]	黄潇潇, 张宝山, 张媛, 麻雨婷. 元刻板印象对随迁儿童攻击行为的效应及挫折感的中介作用 ^*[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(4): 484-496.
[10]	杨亚平, 徐强, 朱婷婷, 郑旭涛, 董晓晔, 陈庆伟. 不同热情-能力社会群体刻板印象激活效应的行为模式：基于刻板印象内容模型 ^*[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(10): 1143-1156.
[11]	崔诣晨, 王沛, 崔亚娟. 知觉冲突印象形成的认知控制策略：以刻板化信息与反刻板化信息为例 ^*[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(10): 1157-1170.
[12]	丁倩, 唐云, 魏华, 张永欣, 周宗奎. 相对剥夺感与大学生网络游戏成瘾的关系：一个有调节的中介模型 ^*[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 1041-1050.
[13]	金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 乌云特娜, 金祥忠. 暴力环境接触对大学生网络攻击行为的影响：反刍思维与网络道德的作用 ^*[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 1051-1060.
[14]	易仲怡, 杨文登, 叶浩生. 具身认知视角下软硬触觉经验对性别角色认知的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(7): 793-802.
[15]	佐斌, 温芳芳, 吴漾, 代涛涛. 群际评价中热情与能力关系的情境演变：评价意图与结果的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(10): 1180-1196.