心理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (9): 1239-1251.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2024.01239
石荣1(), 刘昌2(), 唐慧琳3, 郝俊懿2, 沈汪兵4
收稿日期:
2023-09-27
发布日期:
2024-06-25
出版日期:
2024-09-25
通讯作者:
石荣,刘昌
E-mail:shirong2020@sdu.edu.cn;liuchang@njnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
SHI Rong1(), LIU Chang2(), TANG Huilin3, HAO Junyi2, SHEN Wangbing4
Received:
2023-09-27
Online:
2024-06-25
Published:
2024-09-25
Contact:
SHI Rong, LIU Chang
E-mail:shirong2020@sdu.edu.cn;liuchang@njnu.edu.cn
摘要:
亲社会行为作为亲社会属性的重要方面, 一直是自然和社会科学研究的焦点。然而, 对于人们是否能够形成亲社会行为的一般直觉倾向, 仍存在争论。研究聚焦于慈善情境下的捐助行为, 采用事件相关电位技术考察加工模式和情境紧急性对捐助行为的影响及其神经机制。行为结果发现, 捐助行为受紧急性和捐助成本的双重影响, 随着成本的增加, 个体更愿意帮助紧急情境下的求助者。脑电结果发现, 直觉加工比反思加工诱发了更大的前部N1波幅, 而反思加工比直觉加工诱发了更大的P2波幅。在非紧急情境下, 反思加工比直觉加工诱发了更大的P3波幅。这一结果表明加工模式不仅影响了个体的早期注意和对刺激的评估, 还调节了晚期阶段对非紧急事件的认知投入。研究揭示了加工模式和事件紧急性对亲社会行为的影响, 通过关注紧急性这一潜在调节因素为不一致结果指出了方向, 扩展了对社会启发式假说的理解。
中图分类号:
石荣, 刘昌, 唐慧琳, 郝俊懿, 沈汪兵. (2024). 自发的善行:加工模式和情境紧急性影响亲社会行为. 心理学报, 56(9), 1239-1251.
SHI Rong, LIU Chang, TANG Huilin, HAO Junyi, SHEN Wangbing. (2024). Spontaneous giving: Processing mode and emergency affect prosocial behavior. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 56(9), 1239-1251.
[1] | Achtziger, A., Alós-Ferrer, C., & Wagner, A. K. (2016). The impact of self-control depletion on social preferences in the ultimatum game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 53, 1-16. |
[2] |
Bago, B., Frey, D., Vidal, J., Houdé, O., Borst, G., & De Neys, W. (2018). Fast and slow thinking: Electrophysiological evidence for early conflict sensitivity. Neuropsychologia, 117, 483-490.
doi: S0028-3932(18)30344-0 pmid: 30025789 |
[3] | Batson, C. D., & Adam, A. P. (2003). Altruism and Prosocial Behavior. In T.Millon & M. J.Lerner (I. B., Weiner (Ed.-in-chief).Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology. (Vol. 5, pp. 463-484). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons. |
[4] |
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 396-403.
doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x pmid: 26151975 |
[5] | Bear, A., & Rand, D. G. (2016). Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(4), 936-941. |
[6] | Berg, M.K., Kitayama, S., & Kross, E. (2021). How relationships bias moral reasoning: Neural and self-report evidence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 95, Article 104156. |
[7] | Bolton, G., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90, 166-193. |
[8] | Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31-44. |
[9] |
Carlson, R. W., Aknin, L. B., & Liotti, M. (2016). When is giving an impulse? An ERP investigation of intuitive prosocial behavior. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(7), 1121-1129.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv077 pmid: 26084530 |
[10] |
Chiu Loke, I., Evans, A. D., & Lee, K. (2011). The neural correlates of reasoning about prosocial-helping decisions: An event-related brain potentials study. Brain Research, 1369, 140-148.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.10.109 pmid: 21075089 |
[11] |
Cornelissen, G., Dewitte, S., & Warlop, L. (2011). Are Social Value Orientations Expressed Automatically? Decision Making in the Dictator Game. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(8), 1080-1090.
doi: 10.1177/0146167211405996 pmid: 21518808 |
[12] | Cuthbert, B. N., Schupp, H. T., Bradley, M. M., Birbaumer, N., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Brain potentials in affective picture processing: Covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biological Psychology, 52(2), 95-111. |
[13] |
Decety, J., & Cacioppo, S. (2012). The speed of morality: A high-density electrical neuroimaging study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 108(11), 3068-3072.
doi: 10.1152/jn.00473.2012 pmid: 22956794 |
[14] |
Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J. P. (2011). Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron, 70(2), 200-227.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018 pmid: 21521609 |
[15] |
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9-21.
doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 pmid: 15102499 |
[16] | Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. A. (2006). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. |
[17] |
Eisenberger, N. I. (2015). Social pain and the brain: Controversies, questions, and where to go from here. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 601-629.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115146 pmid: 25251482 |
[18] | Evans, J. S. B. (2018). Dual-process theories. In L. J.Ball, & V. A.Thompson (Eds.). The Routledge International Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 151-166). New York, NY: Routledge. |
[19] |
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223-241.
doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685 pmid: 26172965 |
[20] |
Fan, W., Zhang, Y. X., Wang, X., Wang, X. Y., Zhang, X. Y., & Zhong, Y. P. (2011). The temporal features of self-referential processing evoked by national flag. Neuroscience Letters, 505(3), 233-237.
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.10.017 pmid: 22015762 |
[21] |
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.
doi: 10.3758/bf03193146 pmid: 17695343 |
[22] |
Ferree, T. C., Luu, P., Russell, G. S., & Tucker, D. M. (2001). Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112(3), 536-544.
doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00533-2 pmid: 11222977 |
[23] |
Fields, E. C., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). It’s all about you: An ERP study of emotion and self-relevance in discourse. NeuroImage, 62(1), 562-574.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.003 pmid: 22584232 |
[24] | Fischer, P., Greitemeyer, T., Pollozek, F., & Frey, D. (2006). The unresponsive bystander: Are bystanders more responsive in dangerous emergencies? European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(2), 267-278. |
[25] | Gui, D. Y., Gan, T., & Liu, C. (2016). Neural evidence for moral intuition and the temporal dynamics of interactions between emotional processes and moral cognition. Social Neuroscience, 11(4), 380-394. |
[26] |
Harper, J., Malone, S. M., & Bernat, E. M. (2014). Theta and delta band activity explain N2 and P3 ERP component activity in a go/no-go task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 125(1), 124-132.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.06.025 pmid: 23891195 |
[27] | Hillyard, S. A., & Anllo-Vento, L. (1998). Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(3), 781-787. |
[28] | Horstmann, N., Hausmann, D., & Ryf, S. (2010). Methods for inducing intuitive and deliberate processing modes. In A.Glöckner & C.Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods (pp. 219-237). Hove, England: Psychology Press. |
[29] | Hortensius, R., Schutter, D. J. L. G., & de Gelder, B. (2016). Personal distress and the influence of bystanders on responding to an emergency. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 16(4), 672-688. |
[30] |
Houston, R. J., & Stanford, M. S. (2001). Mid-latency evoked potentials in self-reported impulsive aggression. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 40(1), 1-15.
pmid: 11166104 |
[31] | Hu, X., & Mai, X. (2021). Social value orientation modulates fairness processing during social decision-making: Evidence from behavior and brain potentials. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(7), 670-682. |
[32] |
Isler, O., Yilmaz, O., & John Maule, A. (2021). Religion, parochialism and intuitive cooperation. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(4), 512-521.
doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01014-3 pmid: 33398149 |
[33] |
Isreal, J. B., Chesney, G. L., Wickens, C. D., & Donchin, E. (1980). P300 and tracking difficulty: Evidence for multiple resources in dual-task performance. Psychophysiology, 17(3), 259-273.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1980.tb00146.x pmid: 7384376 |
[34] | Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux. |
[35] |
Keenan, J. P., Wheeler, M. A., Gallup Jr, G. G., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2000). Self-recognition and the right prefrontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(9), 338-344.
pmid: 10962615 |
[36] | Kieslich, P. J., & Hilbig, B. E. (2014). Cognitive conflict in social dilemmas: An analysis of response dynamics. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(6), 510-522. |
[37] |
Kumar, S., Soto, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2009). Electrophysiological evidence for attentional guidance by the contents of working memory. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30(2), 307-317.
doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06805.x pmid: 19691812 |
[38] | Kvarven, A., Strømland, E., Wollbrant, C., Andersson, D., Johannesson, M., Tinghög, G., … Myrseth, K. O. R. (2020). The intuitive cooperation hypothesis revisited: A meta-analytic examination of effect size and between-study heterogeneity. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 6(1), 26-42. |
[39] |
Kwak, Y., Chen, X. J., McDonald, K., & Boutin, B. (2020). Money for me and money for friend: An ERP study of social reward processing in adolescents and adults. Social Neuroscience, 15(1), 83-97.
doi: 10.1080/17470919.2019.1653963 pmid: 31389757 |
[40] |
Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 56(2), 183-197.
doi: 10.3758/bf03213897 pmid: 7971119 |
[41] | Li, J., Sun, Y., Yang, Z., & Zhong, Y. (2020). Social value orientation modulates the processing of social rewards for self: Evidence from ERPs study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(6), 786-800. |
[李琎, 孙宇, 杨子鹿, 钟毅平. (2020). 社会价值取向对自我社会奖赏加工的影响——来自ERPs的证据. 心理学报, 52(6), 786-800.]
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00786 |
|
[42] |
Li, M., Li, J., Li, H., Zhang, G., Fan, W., & Zhong, Y. (2022). Interpersonal distance modulates the influence of social observation on prosocial behaviour: An event-related potential (ERP) study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 176, 108-116.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.03.013 pmid: 35381278 |
[43] | Lieberman, M. D. (2007). The X- and C-systems:The Neural Basis of Automatic and Controlled Social Cognition. In E.HarmonJones & P.Winkielman (Eds.), Fundamentals of social neuroscience (pp. 290-315). New York, NY: Guilford Press. |
[44] | Mischkowski, D., Thielmann, I., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Think it through before making a choice? Processing mode does not influence social mindfulness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 85-97. |
[45] | Niendam, T. A., Laird, A. R., Ray, K. L., Dean, Y. M., Glahn, D. C., & Carter, C. S. (2012). Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 12(2), 241-268. |
[46] | Ortigue, S., Thompson, J. C., Parasuraman, R., & Grafton, S. T. (2009). Spatio-temporal dynamics of human intention understanding in temporo-parietal cortex: A combined EEG/fMRI repetition suppression paradigm. PloS One, 4(9), Article e6962. |
[47] |
Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365-392.
pmid: 15709940 |
[48] | Peysakhovich, A., & Rand, D. G. (2016). Habits of virtue: Creating norms of cooperation and defection in the laboratory. Management Science, 62(3), 631-647. |
[49] |
Protzko, J., Zedelius, C. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2019). Rushing to Appear Virtuous: Time Pressure Increases Socially Desirable Responding. Psychological Science, 30(11), 1584-1591.
doi: 10.1177/0956797619867939 pmid: 31603024 |
[50] |
Rand, D. G. (2016). Cooperation, fast and slow: Meta-analytic evidence for a theory of social heuristics and self-interested deliberation. Psychological Science, 27(9), 1192-1206.
doi: 10.1177/0956797616654455 pmid: 27422875 |
[51] | Rand, D. G., Brescoll, V. L., Everett, J. A., Capraro, V., & Barcelo, H. (2016). Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(4), 389-396. |
[52] | Rand, D. G., & Epstein, Z. G. (2014). Risking your life without a second thought: Intuitive decision-making and extreme altruism. PLoS One, 9(10), Article e109687. |
[53] | Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489(7416), 427-430. |
[54] | Shi, R., Chen, Y., Qi, W., Shen, W., & Liu, S. (2023). When do unfair victims become more prosocial? Benefiting from growth beliefs. Current Psychology, 42(17), 14428-14439. |
[55] |
Shi, R., & Liu, C. (2019). Intuition-based prosociality: Thinking based on social heuristics hypothesis. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(8), 1468-1477.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01468 |
[石荣, 刘昌. (2019). 基于直觉的亲社会性:来自社会启发式假设的思考. 心理科学进展, 27(8), 1468-1477.]
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01468 |
|
[56] | Shi, R., Qi, W. G., Ding, Y., Liu, C., & Shen, W. (2020). Under what circumstances is helping an impulse? Emergency and prosocial traits affect intuitive prosocial behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 159, Article 109828. |
[57] | Siu, A. M., & Shek, D. T. (2005). Validation of the interpersonal reactivity index in a Chinese context. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(2), 118-126. |
[58] | Small, D. A., Loewenstein, G., & Slovic, P. (2007). Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 143-153. |
[59] |
Steinbeis, N., Bernhardt, B. C., & Singer, T. (2012). Impulse control and underlying functions of the left DLPFC mediate age-related and age-independent individual differences in strategic social behavior. Neuron, 73(5), 1040-1051.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.027 pmid: 22405212 |
[60] |
Stevens, J. R., & Hauser, M. D. (2004). Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(2), 60-65.
pmid: 15588809 |
[61] | Tan, M., Li, M., Li, J., Li, H., You, C., Zhang, G., & Zhong, Y. (2022). Risk decision: The self-charity discrepancies in electrophysiological responses to outcome evaluation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, Article 965677. |
[62] |
Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2000). The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology, 37(2), 190-203.
pmid: 10731769 |
[63] | Yan, Z., Yan, L., Zou, X., Fan, W., Tian, Q., & Qiu, X. (2015). A cognitive study of kinship on moral dilemma judgement: Evidence of ERPs. Journal of Psychological Science, 38(1), 54-61. |
[颜志雄, 邹霞, 燕良轼, 范伟, 谭千保, 邱小艳. (2015). 道德两难判断中亲属关系的认知研究: 来自ERPs的证据. 心理科学, 38(1), 54-61 ] | |
[64] |
Yoder, K. J., & Decety, J. (2014). Spatiotemporal neural dynamics of moral judgment: A high-density ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 60, 39-45.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.022 pmid: 24905282 |
[65] | Zaki, J., & Mitchell, J. P. (2013). Intuitive Prosociality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(6), 466-470. |
[66] | Zaki, J. A., & Mitchell, J. P. (2016). Prosociality as a form of reward-seeking. In J. D.Greene, I.Morrison, & M. E.P. Seligman (Eds.), Positive Neuroscience (pp. 57-72). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
[67] |
Zhan, Y., Xiao, X., Tan, Q., Li, J., & Zhong, Y. (2022). Influence of reputational concern and social distance on moral decision-making under the harmful dilemma: Evidence from behavioral and ERPs study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(6), 613-627.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00613 |
[占友龙, 肖啸, 谭千保, 李琎, 钟毅平. (2022). 声誉关注与社会距离对伤害困境中道德决策的影响:来自行为与ERPs的证据. 心理学报, 54(6), 613-627 ]
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00613 |
|
[68] | Zhang, H., Ding, H., Lu, Y., Wang, X., & Cai, D. (2021). Neural Responses to Mandatory and Voluntary Donation Impact Charitable Giving Decisions: An Event-Related Potentials Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 783825. |
[69] | Zhang, H., Zhao, H., & Xu, Y. (2018). The structure of Chinese virtuous personality and questionnaire development. Psychological Exploration, (3), 221-227. |
[张和云, 赵欢欢, 许燕. (2018). 中国人善良人格的结构研究. 心理学探新, (3), 221-227.] |
[1] | 王天鸿, 金珊, 程子鹏, 娄宇, 谢晓非. 利他炫耀中的预测偏差:助人者低估来自旁观者的社会评价[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(9): 1210-1224. |
[2] | 王婧嫣, 张洪. 直觉还是推理?亲社会行为的决策模式与人性感知[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(9): 1225-1238. |
[3] | 林靓, 徐博雅, 杨莹, 张庆鹏, 寇彧. 青少年亲社会行为的网络分析及核心维度[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(9): 1252-1265. |
[4] | 刘梦颖, 蒋婧怡, 杨依琳, 江波, 黄建平. 古典美还是表现美:摆盘美学影响健康饮食决策的计算与神经机制[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(8): 1061-1075. |
[5] | 张锋, 皮瑜, 李小保. 个体与集体时间自我评价:来自行为和ERP的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(4): 447-457. |
[6] | 张玮玮, 陈逸群, 朱莉琪. “近朱者赤”:同伴捐赠决策信息对青少年亲社会行为的影响及公正世界信念的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(9): 1453-1464. |
[7] | 张文芸, 卓诗维, 郑倩倩, 关颖琳, 彭微微. 自闭特质对疼痛共情的影响:疼痛负性情绪和认知的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(9): 1501-1517. |
[8] | 刘倩文, 王振宏. 亲子关系、感觉加工敏感性与COMT Val158Met多态性对学前儿童亲社会行为的交互影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(5): 711-725. |
[9] | 钟毅平, 牛娜娜, 范伟, 任梦梦, 李梅. 动作自主性与社会距离对主动控制感的影响:来自行为与ERPs的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(12): 1932-1948. |
[10] | 李梅, 李琎, 张冠斐, 钟毅平, 李红. 承诺水平与社会距离对信任投资的影响:来自行为与ERPs的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(11): 1859-1871. |
[11] | 覃慧怡, 丁丽洪, 段威, 雷旭. 脑电的重测信度:在多项静息态和任务态实验中的对比[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(10): 1587-1596. |
[12] | 段文婷, 孙启武, 王铭, 吴才智, 陈真珍. 青少年早期亲社会行为倾向、内化问题和外化问题发展级联的个体内分析[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(7): 813-827. |
[13] | 占友龙, 肖啸, 谭千保, 李琎, 钟毅平. 声誉关注与社会距离对伤害困境中道德决策的影响:来自行为与ERPs的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(6): 613-627. |
[14] | 范伟, 任梦梦, 张文洁, 钟毅平. 反馈对自我欺骗的影响:来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(5): 481-496. |
[15] | 李建花, 解佳佳, 庄锦英. 生理周期对情景记忆的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(5): 466-480. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||