心理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (9): 1225-1238.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2024.01225
收稿日期:
2023-09-19
发布日期:
2024-06-25
出版日期:
2024-09-25
通讯作者:
张洪
E-mail:vivianzh@nju.edu.cn
基金资助:
Received:
2023-09-19
Online:
2024-06-25
Published:
2024-09-25
Contact:
ZHANG Hong
E-mail:vivianzh@nju.edu.cn
摘要:
亲社会行为背后可能有着复杂的决策机制, 然而鲜有研究关注人们在实施亲社会行为时采取的不同决策模式对社会认知和判断产生的影响。本研究通过4项实验(N = 1657), 考察了在高、低情感唤起场景中, 人们对于采取直觉或推理决策模式的亲社会行为者的人性判断。结果发现: 在高情感唤起情境中, 直觉亲社会行为者人性中的本质属性维度高于推理亲社会行为者, 但在独特属性上没有差异(实验1~3); 在低情感唤起情境中, 推理亲社会行为者人性中的独特属性维度高于直觉亲社会行为者, 本质属性上的结果则可能依赖于情境(如后果等, 实验2~4)。因而, 实验4在低情感唤起情境下引入了积极和消极的行为后果, 发现积极的行为后果可能增加对直觉亲社会行为者的人性判断。该研究贴合复杂的现实社会情境, 有助于我们更好地认识亲社会行为的多样性, 并加深我们对于人性的理解。
中图分类号:
王婧嫣, 张洪. (2024). 直觉还是推理?亲社会行为的决策模式与人性感知. 心理学报, 56(9), 1225-1238.
WANG Jingyan, ZHANG Hong. (2024). Intuition or deliberation? Decision making strategies in prosocial behavior and perceptions of humanness. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 56(9), 1225-1238.
[1] |
Aquino, K., & Reed, A. II. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423-1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423
URL pmid: 12500822 |
[2] | Bago, B., Bonnefon, J. -F., & De Neys, W. (2021). Intuition rather than deliberation determines selfish and prosocial choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(6), 1081-1094. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000968 |
[3] |
Barasch, A., Levine, E. E., Berman, J. Z., & Small, D. A. (2014). Selfish or selfless? on the signal value of emotion in altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 393-413. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037207
doi: 10.1037/a0037207 URL pmid: 25133723 |
[4] | Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2010). Excluded from humanity: The dehumanizing effects of social ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.022 |
[5] | Bastian, B., Jetten, J., & Radke, H. R. (2012). Cyber- dehumanization: Violent video game play diminishes our humanity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 486-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.009 |
[6] | Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation:Is it ever truly altruistic? In L.Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 65-122). Academic Press. |
[7] | Batson, C. D. (1990). How social an animal? the human capacity for caring. American Psychologist, 45(3), 336-346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.3.336 |
[8] | Batson, C. D., & Shaw, L. L. (1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2(2), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0202_1 |
[9] | Berman, J. Z., & Silver, I. (2022). Prosocial behavior and reputation: When does doing good lead to looking good? Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 102-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.021 |
[10] | Carlo, G. (2014). The development and correlates of prosocial moral behaviors. In M.Killen & J. G.Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 208-234). Psychology Press. |
[11] | Dubljević, V., Sattler, S., & Racine, E. (2018). Deciphering moral intuition: How agents, deeds, and consequences influence moral judgment. PloS One, 13(10), e0204631. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206750 |
[12] | Eisenberg, N., Pasternack, J. F., Cameron, E., & Tryon, K. (1984). The relation of quantity and mode of prosocial behavior to moral cognitions and social style. Child Development, 55(4), 1479-1485. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130017 |
[13] |
Epley, N., Akalis, S., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). Creating social connection through inferential reproduction: Loneliness and perceived agency in gadgets, gods, and greyhounds. Psychological Science, 19(2), 114-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02056.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02056.x URL pmid: 18271858 |
[14] | Epstein, S. (2013). Cognitive-experiential self-theory:An integrative theory of personality. In H.Tennen, J.Suls, I.& Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology (pp. 93-118). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
[15] |
Evans, J. S. B. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
URL pmid: 18154502 |
[16] |
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
doi: 10.3758/bf03193146 URL pmid: 17695343 |
[17] | Forsyth, D. R. (1985). Individual differences in information integration during moral judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 264-272. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.264 |
[18] |
Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315(5812), 619-619. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134475
URL pmid: 17272713 |
[19] |
Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107(3), 1144-1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004
URL pmid: 18158145 |
[20] | Grueneisen, S., & Warneken, F. (2022). The development of prosocial behavior-From sympathy to strategy. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 323-328. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.005 |
[21] |
Hare, B. (2017). Survival of the friendliest: Homo sapiens evolved via selection for prosociality. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 155-186. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044201
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044201 URL pmid: 27732802 |
[22] |
Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252-264. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4 URL pmid: 16859440 |
[23] | Haslam, N. (2022). Dehumanization and the lack of social connection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 312-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.013 |
[24] | Haslam, N., Loughnan, S., Reynolds, C., & Wilson, S. (2007). Dehumanization: A new perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 409-422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00030.x |
[25] | Hein, G., Lamm, C., Brodbeck, C., & Singer, T. (2011). Skin conductance response to the pain of others predicts later costly helping. PloS One, 6(8), e22759. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022759 |
[26] | Henrich, J., & Henrich, N. (2006). Culture, evolution and the puzzle of human cooperation. Cognitive Systems Research, 7(2-3), 220-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.11.010 |
[27] | Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 283-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38006-9 |
[28] | Lakens, D., & Caldwell, A. R. (2021). Simulation-based power analysis for factorial analysis of variance designs. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920951503 |
[29] | Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition & Emotion, 14(4), 473-493. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402763 |
[30] | Levine, E. E., Barasch, A., Rand, D., Berman, J. Z., & Small, D. A. (2018). Signaling emotion and reason in cooperation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(5), 702-719. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000399 |
[31] | Leyens, J. P., Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez-Perez, A., & Gaunt, R. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 186-197. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_06 |
[32] | Liang, F., Tan, Q., Zhan, Y., Wu, X., & Li, J. (2021). Selfish or altruistic? the influence of thinking styles and stereotypes on moral decision-making. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110465 |
[33] | Lin-Healy, F., & Small, D. A. (2012). Cheapened altruism: Discounting personally affected prosocial actors. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(2), 269-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.11.006 |
[34] |
Maglio, S. J., & Reich, T. (2019). Feeling certain: Gut choice, the true self, and attitude certainty. Emotion, 19(5), 876-888. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000490
doi: 10.1037/emo0000490 URL pmid: 30198736 |
[35] |
Newman, G. E., De Freitas, J., & Knobe, J. (2015). Beliefs about the true self explain asymmetries based on moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 39(1), 96-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12134
doi: 10.1111/cogs.12134 URL pmid: 25039306 |
[36] |
Norris, P., & Epstein, S. (2011). An experiential thinking style: Its facets and relations with objective and subjective criterion measures. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1043-1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00718.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00718.x URL pmid: 21241307 |
[37] |
Parkes, D. C., & Wellman, M. P. (2015). Economic reasoning and artificial intelligence. Science, 349(6245), 267-272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8403
doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8403 URL pmid: 26185245 |
[38] |
Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365-392. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141
URL pmid: 15709940 |
[39] | Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489(7416), 427-430. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11467 |
[40] |
Rode, C., Cosmides, L., Hell, W., & Tooby, J. (1999). When and why do people avoid unknown probabilities in decisions under uncertainty? Testing some predictions from optimal foraging theory. Cognition, 72(3), 269-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00041-4
URL pmid: 10519925 |
[41] |
Shi, R., & Liu, C. (2019). Intuition-based prosociality: Thinking based on social heuristics hypothesis. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(8), 1468-1477. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01468
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01468 URL |
[石荣, 刘昌. (2019). 基于直觉的亲社会性:来自社会启发式假设的思考. 心理科学进展, 27(8), 1468-1477. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01468]
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01468 URL |
|
[42] | Shi, R., Qi, W. G., Ding, Y., Liu, C., & Shen, W. (2020). Under what circumstances is helping an impulse? Emergency and prosocial traits affect intuitive prosocial behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 159, 109828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109828 |
[43] | Silver, I., Kelly, B. A., & Small, D. A. (2021). Selfless first movers and self-interested followers: Order of entry signals purity of motive in pursuit of the greater good. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(3), 501-517. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1228 |
[44] | Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 322-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x |
[45] | Sorrapera, I., Suvorov, A., van de Ven, J., & Villeval, M. C. (2019). Doing bad to look good: Negative consequences of image concerns on prosocial behavior. Revue Economique, 70(6), 909-931. https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.706.0945 |
[46] |
Steinbeis, N., Bernhardt, B. C., & Singer, T. (2012). Impulse control and underlying functions of the left DLPFC mediate age-related and age-independent individual differences in strategic social behavior. Neuron, 73(5), 1040-1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.027
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.027 URL pmid: 22405212 |
[47] |
Stevens, J. R., & Hauser, M. D. (2004). Why be nice? psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(2), 60-65. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.003
URL pmid: 15588809 |
[48] |
Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science, 311(5765), 1301-1303. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121448
doi: 10.1126/science.1121448 URL pmid: 16513986 |
[49] |
Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 222-244. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016984
doi: 10.1037/a0016984 URL pmid: 20085397 |
[50] | Zhan, Y. L., Liu, C. L., Xiao, X., Tan, Q. B., & Fu, X. L. (2023). Theoretical models and neural mechanisms of prosocial risky behavior. Chinese Science Bulletin, 68(2-3), 154-168. https://doi.org/10.1360/TB-2022-0699 |
[占友龙, 刘长林, 肖啸, 谭千保, 傅小兰. (2023). 亲社会风险行为及其理论模型与神经机制. 科学通报, 68(2-3), 154-168. https://doi.org/10.1360/TB-2022-0699 ] |
[1] | 王天鸿, 金珊, 程子鹏, 娄宇, 谢晓非. 利他炫耀中的预测偏差:助人者低估来自旁观者的社会评价[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(9): 1210-1224. |
[2] | 石荣, 刘昌, 唐慧琳, 郝俊懿, 沈汪兵. 自发的善行:加工模式和情境紧急性影响亲社会行为[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(9): 1239-1251. |
[3] | 林靓, 徐博雅, 杨莹, 张庆鹏, 寇彧. 青少年亲社会行为的网络分析及核心维度[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(9): 1252-1265. |
[4] | 王阳, 温芳芳, 佐斌. 3~8岁儿童对群体认知的社会性线索偏好及发展特点[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(9): 1424-1440. |
[5] | 张玮玮, 陈逸群, 朱莉琪. “近朱者赤”:同伴捐赠决策信息对青少年亲社会行为的影响及公正世界信念的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(9): 1453-1464. |
[6] | 刘倩文, 王振宏. 亲子关系、感觉加工敏感性与COMT Val158Met多态性对学前儿童亲社会行为的交互影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(5): 711-725. |
[7] | 张奇, 张庆翔, 张笑笑, 高超. 规则变型推理对远迁移问题解决的促进[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 117-128. |
[8] | 段文婷, 孙启武, 王铭, 吴才智, 陈真珍. 青少年早期亲社会行为倾向、内化问题和外化问题发展级联的个体内分析[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(7): 813-827. |
[9] | 刘文兴, 祝养浩, 柏阳, 王海江, 韩翼. 孤芳自赏还是乐于助人?员工自恋对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(3): 300-312. |
[10] | 张文新, 李曦, 陈光辉, 曹衍淼. 母亲积极教养与青少年亲社会行为:共情的中介作用与OXTR基因的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(9): 976-991. |
[11] | 魏新东, 汪凤炎. 自我-朋友冲突情境下智慧推理的文化差异及其机制[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(11): 1244-1259. |
[12] | 陈曦梅, 罗一君, 陈红. 友谊质量与青少年直觉进食:链式中介模型及性别差异[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(4): 485-496. |
[13] | 王文超, 伍新春. 共情对灾后青少年亲社会行为的影响:感恩、社会支持和创伤后成长的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(3): 307-316. |
[14] | 姚琦, 吴章建, 张常清, 符国群. 权力感对炫耀性亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(12): 1421-1435. |
[15] | 王建峰, 戴冰. “追名弃利”:权力动机与社会存在对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(1): 55-65. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||