心理科学进展 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7): 1048-1056.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.01048
周蕾1, 林浇敏1, 陈艺琦1, 梁泳超1, 古晨妍1(), 孙祺章2(
)
收稿日期:
2023-11-10
出版日期:
2024-07-15
发布日期:
2024-05-09
通讯作者:
古晨妍, E-mail: g_cy1989163@163.com;
孙祺章, E-mail: Qizhang.Sun@bit.edu.cn
基金资助:
ZHOU Lei1, LIN Jiao-Min1, CHEN Yi-Qi1, LIANG Yong-Chao1, GU Chen-Yan1(), SUN Qi-Zhang2(
)
Received:
2023-11-10
Online:
2024-07-15
Published:
2024-05-09
摘要:
公众的绿色行为普遍要求将可持续原则纳入日常的跨期决策, 选择对环境友好的长远利益。然而, 绿色行为通常“知易行难”, 其重要原因可能在于人们对行为的结果和效用等存在不确定性感知。在绿色行为的跨期决策研究中, 不确定性感知如何影响决策偏好尚缺少证据。因此, 本研究拟基于整合的不确定性跨期决策新理论框架, 综合运用行为实验、眼动追踪、现场实验, 辅以计算建模、眼动操纵等技术, 揭示在不确定性条件下, 人们践行绿色跨期行为的规律和心理机制, 并探索基于心理机制助推和助力绿色行为的有效途径。本研究将加深对绿色行为心理机制的理解, 并为有效促进绿色行为提供方案, 为相关公共政策的制定与发布提供依据。
中图分类号:
周蕾, 林浇敏, 陈艺琦, 梁泳超, 古晨妍, 孙祺章. (2024). 不确定性跨期决策视角下绿色行为的心理机制及干预. 心理科学进展 , 32(7), 1048-1056.
ZHOU Lei, LIN Jiao-Min, CHEN Yi-Qi, LIANG Yong-Chao, GU Chen-Yan, SUN Qi-Zhang. (2024). The psychological mechanism and promotion of green behavior from the perspective of uncertainty intertemporal decision-making. Advances in Psychological Science, 32(7), 1048-1056.
[1] | 白晶, 张义, 戴侃记, 张建霞, 张少白, 张峰, 张发胜, 李德兵. (2015). 陕西省山区留守儿童预防接种核心信息干预效果评价. 医学动物防制, 31(12), 1370-1372. |
[2] | 陈泓菲, 辛自强. (2018-3-19). 助推, 促进, 由心而治——社会治理的三种心理学路径. 中国社会科学报, 6. |
[3] | 陈凯. (2020). 信息干预对绿色消费行为的影响分析. 中国特色社会主义研究, 2(5/6), 126-131. |
[4] | 范志国, 郭靖丽. (2014). 虚拟品牌社群体验对消费者购买意愿影响的实证研究——基于感知不确定性的中介效应. 工业技术经济, 33(11), 29-37. |
[5] |
郭梦茜, 张宁. (2022). 助推手卫生的行为干预策略. 心理科学进展, 30(4), 863-876.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.00863 |
[6] |
何贵兵, 李纾, 梁竹苑. (2018). 以小拨大: 行为决策助推社会发展. 心理学报, 50(8), 803-813.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00803 |
[7] | 何贵兵, 杨鑫蔚, 蒋多. (2017). 环境损益的社会折扣: 利他人格的影响. 心理学报, 49(10), 1334-1343. |
[8] |
黄元娜, 宋星云, 邵洋, 李纾, 梁竹苑. (2018). 以小拨大: 默认选项和反应模式效应助推中国器官捐献登记. 心理学报, 50(8), 868-879.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00868 |
[9] |
李爱梅, 王海侠, 孙海龙, 熊冠星, 杨韶丽. (2018). “长计远虑”的助推效应: 怀孕与环境跨期决策. 心理学报, 50(8), 858-867.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00858 |
[10] |
林浇敏, 李爱梅, 周雅然, 何军红, 周蕾. (2022). 眼动操纵技术在决策研究中的应用前景: 改变决策行为. 心理科学进展, 30(8), 1794-1803.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.01794 |
[11] | 生态环境部环境与经济政策研究中心. (2022). 公民生态环境行为调查报告. 2023-12-05取自: http://www.prcee.org/zyhd/202306/t20230629_1034892.html |
[12] | 新华社. (2020). 习近平在第七十五届联合国大会一般性辩论上的讲话. 2022-01-30取自: http://bit.ly/3vDFMm6 |
[13] | 张耕, 刘震宇. (2010). 在线消费者感知不确定性及其影响因素的作用. 南开管理评论, 13(5), 99-106. |
[14] | 张书维, 王宇, 周蕾. (2018). 行为公共政策视角下的助推与助力: 殊途同归. 中国公共政策评论, 15(2), 20-38. |
[15] | 钟玲, 曹磊, 刘清芝, 张小丹. (2021). 关于推动绿色生活方式的思考与建议. 环境与可持续发展, 46(5), 140-143. |
[16] |
周蕾, 李爱梅, 张磊, 李纾, 梁竹苑. (2019). 风险决策和跨期决策的过程比较: 以确定效应和即刻效应为例. 心理学报, 51(3), 337-352.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00337 |
[17] | Amir, D., Jordan, M. R., & Rand, D. G. (2018). An uncertainty management perspective on long-run impacts of adversity: The influence of childhood socioeconomic status on risk, time, and social preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 217-226. |
[18] |
Ammerman, A. S., Lindquist, C. H., Lohr, K. N., & Hersey, J. (2002). The efficacy of behavioral interventions to modify dietary fat and fruit and vegetable intake: A review of the evidence. Preventive Medicine, 35(1), 25-41.
doi: 10.1006/pmed.2002.1028 pmid: 12079438 |
[19] | Arimura, T. H., Li, S., Newell, R. G., & Palmer, K. (2012). Cost-effectiveness of electricity energy efficiency programs. The Energy Journal, 33(2), 63-100. |
[20] | Ashley, R., Blackwood, D., Butler, D., Davies, J., Jowitt, P., & Smith, H. (2003). Sustainable decision making for the UK water industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability, 156(1), 41-49. |
[21] | Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992-1026. |
[22] | Boon-Falleur, M., Baumard, N., & André, J. -B. (2021). Risk-seeking or impatient? Disentangling variance and time in hazardous behaviors. Evolution and Human Behavior, 42(5), 453-460. |
[23] |
Brunyé, T. T., & Gardony, A. L. (2017). Eye tracking measures of uncertainty during perceptual decision making. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 120, 60-68.
doi: S0167-8760(17)30238-6 pmid: 28732659 |
[24] | Bulley, A., & Pepper, G. V. (2017). Cross-country relationships between life expectancy, intertemporal choice and age at first birth. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(5), 652-658. |
[25] | Carson, R. T., & Tran, B. R. (2009). Discounting behavior and environmental decisions. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 2(2), 112-130. |
[26] | Chen, Y., Lu, F., & Zhang, J. (2017). Social comparisons, status and driving behavior. Journal of Public Economics, 155, 11-20. |
[27] | Cooper, D. J., & Rege, M. (2011). Misery loves company: Social regret and social interaction effects in choices under risk and uncertainty. Games and Economic Behavior, 73(1), 91-110. |
[28] | Corral-Verdugo, V., Fraijo-Sing, B., & Pinheiro, J. Q. (2006). Sustainable behavior and time perspective: Present, past, and future orientations and their relationship with water conservation behavior. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 139-147. |
[29] | Dai, J., Pachur, T., Pleskac, T. J., & Hertwig, R. (2019). Tomorrow never knows:Why and how uncertainty matters in intertemporal choice. In R. Hertwig, T. J. Pleskac, T. Pachur, & the Center for Adaptive Rationality (Eds.), Taming uncertainty (pp. 175-190). Mit Press. |
[30] |
De Groot, J. I. M., Steg, L., & Poortinga, W. (2013). Values, perceived risks and benefits, and acceptability of nuclear energy. Risk Analysis, 33(2), 307-317.
doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01845.x pmid: 22642255 |
[31] | Emas, R. (2015). The concept of sustainable development: Definition and defining principles. Brief for GSDR, Florida International University. |
[32] | Enzler, H. B., Diekmann, A., & Liebe, U. (2019). Do environmental concern and future orientation predict metered household electricity use? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 62, 22-29. |
[33] | Farias, A. R., Coruk, S., & Simão, C. (2021). The effects of temporal discounting on perceived seriousness of environmental behavior: Exploring the moderator role of consumer attitudes regarding green purchasing. Sustainability, 13(13), 7130. |
[34] |
Fiorenzato, E., & Cona, G. (2022). One-year into COVID-19 pandemic: Decision-making and mental-health outcomes and their risk factors. Journal of Affective Disorders, 309, 418-427.
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.144 pmid: 35490882 |
[35] | Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351-401. |
[36] | Fuller, C., Michie, S., Savage, J., McAteer, J., Besser, S., Charlett, S.,... Duckworth, G., (2012). The feedback intervention trial (FIT)—improving hand-hygiene compliance in UK healthcare workers: A stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. PloS One, 7(10), Article e41617. |
[37] | Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472-482. |
[38] | Grandin, A., Guillou, L., Sater, R. A., Foucault, M., & Chevallier, C. (2022). Socioeconomic status, time preferences and pro-environmentalism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79, Article 101720. |
[39] | Haltinner, K., & Sarathchandra, D. (2022). Predictors of pro-environmental beliefs, behaviors, and policy support among climate change skeptics. Social Currents, 9(2), 180-202. |
[40] | Hardisty, D. J., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Discounting future green: Money versus the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 329-340. |
[41] | Hersh, M. A. (1999). Sustainable decision making: The role of decision support systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 29(3), 395-408. |
[42] | Hertwig, R. (2017). When to consider boosting: Some rules for policy-makers. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(2), 143-161. |
[43] |
Hertwig, R., & Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2017). Nudging and boosting: Steering or empowering good decisions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 973-986.
doi: 10.1177/1745691617702496 pmid: 28792862 |
[44] | Jian, Y., Yu, I. Y., Yang, M. X., & Zeng, K. J. (2020). The impacts of fear and uncertainty of COVID-19 on environmental concerns, brand trust, and behavioral intentions toward green hotels. Sustainability, 12(20), 8688. |
[45] | Joireman, J. A., Van Lange, P. A. M., & Van Vugt, M. (2004). Who cares about the environmental impact of cars? Those with an eye toward the future. Environment and Behavior, 36(2), 187-206. |
[46] | Kidd, C., Palmeri, H., & Aslin, R. N. (2013). Rational snacking: Young children’s decision-making on the marshmallow task is moderated by beliefs about environmental reliability. Cognition, 126(1), 109-114. |
[47] |
Kortenkamp, K. V., & Moore, C. F. (2006). Time, uncertainty, and individual differences in decisions to cooperate in resource dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(5), 603-615.
pmid: 16702154 |
[48] | Lew, D. K. (2018). Discounting future payments in stated preference choice experiments. Resource and Energy Economics, 54, 150-164. |
[49] | Liao, Y. -K., Wu, W. -Y., & Pham, T. -T. (2020). Examining the moderating effects of green marketing and green psychological benefits on customers’ green attitude, value and purchase intention. Sustainability, 12(18), 7461. |
[50] | Loomes, G., Orr, S., & Sugden, R. (2009). Taste uncertainty and status quo effects in consumer choice. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 39(2), 113-135. |
[51] | Luckman, A., Donkin, C., & Newell, B. R. (2020). An evaluation and comparison of models of risky intertemporal choice. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1097-1138. |
[52] |
McGuire, J. T., & Kable, J. W. (2013). Rational temporal predictions can underlie apparent failures to delay gratification. Psychological Review, 120(2), 395-410.
doi: 10.1037/a0031910 pmid: 23458085 |
[53] |
Noar, S. M., Benac, C. N., & Harris, M. S. (2007). Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 673-693.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.673 pmid: 17592961 |
[54] | Pichert, D., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2008). Green defaults: Information presentation and pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), 63-73. |
[55] | Premier Ministre Français (Ed.) (2011). “Green nudges”: New incentives for ecological behaviour. Centre d'analyse stratégique, |
[56] | Qin, C., Xu, J., Wong-Parodi, G., & Xue, L. (2018). Change in public concern and responsive behaviors toward air pollution under the dome. Risk Analysis, 40(10), 1983-2001. |
[57] | Read, D. (2004). Intertemporal choice. In N. H. Derek & J. Koehler (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 424-443). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. |
[58] | Refaie, N., & Mishra, S. (2020). Embodied capital and risk-related traits, attitudes, behaviors, and outcomes: An exploratory examination of attractiveness, cognitive ability, and physical ability. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(7), 949-964. |
[59] | Reijula, S., & Hertwig, R. (2022). Self-nudging and the citizen choice architect. Behavioural Public Policy, 6(1), 119-149. |
[60] | Ryu, H., & Jun, S. (2019, May). Influence of social self- identification on sustainable consumption: Moderating role of future self-continuity. Paper presented at the 48th Annual EMAC Conference, Hamburg, Germany. |
[61] | Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424. |
[62] | Stöckigt, G., Schiebener, J., & Brand, M. (2018). Providing sustainability information in shopping situations contributes to sustainable decision making: An empirical study with choice-based conjoint analyses. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 43, 188-199. |
[63] | Sun, X., Su, W., Guo, X., & Tian, Z. (2021). The impact of awe induced by COVID-19 pandemic on green consumption behavior in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 543. |
[64] | Tanaka, T., Camerer, C. F., & Nguyen, Q. (2010). Risk and time preferences: Linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. American Economic Review, 100(1), 557-571. |
[65] | Thaler, R. H., Sunstein, C. R., & Balz, J. P. (2013). Choice architecture. In E. Shafir (Ed.), The behavioral foundations of public policy (pp. 428-439). Princeton University Press. |
[66] | van der Wal, A. J., van Horen, F., & Grinstein, A. (2018). Temporal myopia in sustainable behavior under uncertainty. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35(3), 378-393. |
[67] | Vedadi, A., & Greer, T. H. (2021). Revisiting how perceived uncertainty and herd behavior influence technology choice. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 33(6), 1-19. |
[68] |
Winterich, K. P., Nenkov, G. Y., & Gonzales, G. E. (2019). Knowing what it makes: How product transformation salience increases recycling. Journal of Marketing, 83(4), 21-37.
doi: 10.1177/0022242919842167 |
[69] | Wu, X., Li, J., & Li, Y. (2022). The impact of uncertainty induced by the COVID-19 pandemic on intertemporal choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 103, Article 104397. |
[70] | Yoon, A., Jeong, D., & Chon, J. (2021). The impact of the risk perception of ocean microplastics on tourists’ pro-environmental behavior intention. Science of The Total Environment, 774, Article 144782. |
[71] | Zhang, X., Wu, Z., & He, Q. (2023). A mini-review on how the COVID-19 pandemic affected intertemporal choice. Psychoradiology, 3, Article kkad021. |
[72] | Zhang, Y., Gao, Y., & Jiang, J. (2021). An unpredictable environment reduces pro-environmental behavior: A dynamic public goods experiment on forest use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 78, Article 101702. |
[1] | 贾云丞, 程刚, 丁芳媛, 陈加, 龙女, 陈玉荣, 林楠. 对中性婴儿面孔注意偏向与表情不确定性的关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(9): 1393-1407. |
[2] | 匡仪, 黄元娜, 马家涛, 尹述飞. 时空框架效应的理论与应用探索[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(9): 1416-1429. |
[3] | 傅昱涵, 梅高兴. 刺激持续时间调节序列依赖效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(suppl.): 125-125. |
[4] | 陈妍妍, 伍俊辉, 栾胜华. 代际困境中合作行为的发生机制及促进策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(9): 1728-1741. |
[5] | 沈丝楚, 王耀民, 张寒冰, 马家涛. 折扣还是权衡:混合得失双结果跨期决策的理论探索[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(7): 1121-1132. |
[6] | 张宁, 王安然. 助推戒烟的行为干预策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(4): 684-696. |
[7] | 李燕, 陈文进, 张书维. 基于元分析的助推效果研究:“认知路径”与“透明性”的二维视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(12): 2275-2294. |
[8] | 杜棠艳, 胡小勇, 杨静, 李兰玉, 王甜甜. 低社会经济地位与跨期决策:威胁视角下的心理转变机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(8): 1894-1904. |
[9] | 赵宁, 刘鑫, 李纾, 郑蕊. 默认选项设置的助推效果:来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(6): 1230-1241. |
[10] | 毕翠华, 齐怀远. 时间感知在跨期决策中的作用——时间决策模型的新探索[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(5): 1106-1118. |
[11] | 张姝玥, 黄骏青, 赵峰, 徐科朋. 社会排斥影响跨期决策的心理机制探讨[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3): 486-498. |
[12] | 孙海龙, 安薪如, 李爱梅, 赖慧燕, 李泽虹. 动机冲突影响混合跨期决策:趋近-回避动机理论视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(12): 2628-2638. |
[13] | 于坤, 王哲源, 彭雄良, 王佩, 赵泽珺, 严一丹, 曹培悦. 组织中利他行为的可持续性及其前因机制:基于主动性动机视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(10): 2164-2176. |
[14] | 李爱梅, 车敬上, 刘楠, 孙海龙, 周玮. 海量信息如何影响跨期决策?基于注意资源的理论视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(9): 1521-1533. |
[15] | 黄元娜, 李云箫, 李纾. 为什么被选的和被拒的会是同一个备择选项?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 1010-1021. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||