ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (9): 1728-1741.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.01728

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

代际困境中合作行为的发生机制及促进策略

陈妍妍, 伍俊辉(), 栾胜华()   

  1. 中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室, 北京 100101;中国科学院大学心理系, 北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-31 出版日期:2023-09-15 发布日期:2023-05-31
  • 通讯作者: 伍俊辉,栾胜华 E-mail:wujunhui@psych.ac.cn;luansh@psych.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学院心理研究所科研项目(Y5CX052003);中国科学院心理研究所科研项目(E2CX3315CX);中国科学院心理研究所科研项目(E1CX0230);国家自然科学基金项目(32171074)

The mechanisms and promotion strategies of cooperation in the intergenerational dilemma

CHEN Yanyan, WU Junhui(), LUAN Shenghua()   

  1. CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2023-01-31 Online:2023-09-15 Published:2023-05-31
  • Contact: WU Junhui, LUAN Shenghua E-mail:wujunhui@psych.ac.cn;luansh@psych.ac.cn

摘要:

代际困境反映了当前自我利益与未来他人利益之间发生冲突的情境。人们在代际困境中如何权衡利益事关个体、组织乃至全人类的福祉。相比于传统社会困境, 代际困境具有权力不对称、合作行为无直接回报和心理距离较远这三个特异性特征, 它们是阻碍代际合作的主要原因。基于当前研究广泛关注的个人特质、决策情境和社会规范这三类影响代际合作的因素, 本文建议可通过培养感恩与亲社会品质、扩大代际合作的声誉影响、提高与未来世代的亲近度、减少对未来结果的不确定感等方式促进代际合作行为。未来研究需进一步探究研究范式的生态效度, 揭示声誉线索对代际合作的影响, 并广泛开展跨文化研究, 为促进代际合作行为提供更有力的理论和实践依据。

关键词: 代际合作, 亲社会特质, 社会规范, 声誉, 助推

Abstract:

Intergenerational dilemma refers to situations that involve conflicts between one’s self-interest in the present and the interest of others in the future, which are ubiquitous in any human society. How people make decisions in such situations can affect individuals, organizations, and even the welfare of all human beings. Different from traditional social dilemmas that reflect the conflicting interests between individuals and the group they belong to, intergenerational dilemmas involve “generations” across time and space, who are broadly defined as individuals or groups playing a specific role during a limited period. Moreover, intergenerational dilemmas are characterized by three unique features, namely power asymmetry (i.e., the behavior of the previous generation affects the interests of the next generation, but the behavior of the next generation does not affect the interests of the previous generation), lack of direct reciprocity (i.e., the next generation cannot directly reciprocate the cooperative behavior of the previous generation), and longer psychological distance (i.e., greater time lag, social distance, and uncertainty for the outcomes of future others). These features are the key reasons why the overall level of intergenerational cooperation tends to be low. To explore why people cooperate in intergenerational dilemmas, researchers often measure intergenerational cooperation using participants’ willingness to cooperate in hypothetical scenarios or observe their actual behavior in incentivized game tasks, both of which have their own advantages and limitations. Overall, previous research has suggested three main factors—personality traits, decision contexts, and social norms—that influence intergenerational cooperation. Based on these factors and two unique features of intergenerational dilemmas (i.e., lack of direct reciprocity and longer psychological distance), we propose four boosting or nudging intervention strategies to promote cooperative behavior in intergenerational dilemmas: (a) to cultivate gratitude and prosocial traits starting from early childhood, such as writing gratitude diaries and expressing gratitude to specific people, (b) to enhance the reputational effects of intergenerational cooperative behavior, such as increasing the publicity of individuals’ behaviors that have consequences for future generations, (c) to increase individuals’ affinity with future generations, such as asking them to record the potential future risks of climate change or write to future others, and (d) to decrease individuals’ perceived uncertainty about future outcomes, such as providing them with accurate value information about the behavioral consequences for carbon emissions and carbon reduction.
Notably, despite the accumulation of research on intergenerational dilemmas, there remains three major unanswered questions that are worthy of future research. First, future research should examine the ecological validity of extant research paradigms, particularly distinguishing the intergenerational cooperation measured by different paradigms and examining how they correlate with real-world intergenerational cooperation. Second, future research should investigate the roles of reputational cues in intergenerational dilemmas and explore the situations in which they promote intergenerational cooperation. Finally, in the context of global climate change, how to promote intergenerational cooperation and sustainable development is a common challenge faced by all countries in the world, but the conclusions drawn from a single cultural background cannot be directly applied to different cultural groups. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the cross-cultural differences in intergenerational cooperation and the sociocultural variables (e.g., individualism-collectivism, cultural tightness-looseness) that may explain these differences. Addressing these issues will provide useful insights for how to make policies that promote intergenerational cooperation more effectively.

Key words: intergenerational cooperation, prosocial trait, social norm, reputation, nudge

中图分类号: