心理科学进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 492-506.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.00492
• 研究前沿 • 上一篇
收稿日期:
2022-07-18
出版日期:
2023-03-15
发布日期:
2022-12-22
通讯作者:
王艇
E-mail:t-wang@163.com
基金资助:
Received:
2022-07-18
Online:
2023-03-15
Published:
2022-12-22
Contact:
WANG Ting
E-mail:t-wang@163.com
摘要:
数字“0”由于自身所具有的特性(最小的自然数和不可作为被除数), 当其与商品的价格维度和属性维度相结合时会对消费者的决策产生影响。已有研究表明商品的零价格和零属性会对消费决策产生影响, 即零价格效应和零比较效应。情绪和社会规范是零价格效应产生的心理机制, 参照依赖则是零比较效应产生的心理机制。商品价格、商品类型和消费者的心理因素是零价格效应的边界条件; 而选项的数量是零比较效应的边界条件。未来的研究可以从不同商品类型、不同社会规范、“价格-损失”与“价格-质量”、注意等角度对零价格效应进行深入研究; 也可以从结构匹配模型和齐当别模型的角度进一步探索零比较效应的“比较”机制; 可以探讨价格是否能被视为商品的“坏属性”, 进而讨论零价格效应和零比较效应二者之间的关系。
中图分类号:
杨智超, 王艇. (2023). 消费决策中的零:零价格效应和零比较效应. 心理科学进展 , 31(3), 492-506.
YANG Zhichao, WANG Ting. (2023). Zero in consumer decision-making: The zero-price effect and the zero-comparison effect. Advances in Psychological Science, 31(3), 492-506.
[1] | 毕研玲, 李纾. (2007). 有限理性的“占优启发式”和“齐当别”决策模型的作为——当Allais悖论杠杆撬动了期望效用理论. 心理科学进展, 15(4), 682-688. |
[2] | 江程铭, 杨舒雯, 陈俊芳, 李纾. (2018). 信上帝还是不信上帝: 分析式和启发式决策的解释. 自然辩证法通讯, 40(10), 23-31. |
[3] | 李晓靖, 贾士军, 崔文君. (2019). 数字偏好与住宅价格——以广州市为例. 中国房地产, (9), 19-28. |
[4] | 沈超红, 方新, 喻路遥. (2019). “零价格效应”的作用机制研究. 价格理论与实践, (2), 112-116. |
[5] | 孙颖, 王鲁晓, 宋玥, 蒋奖. (2020). 物质主义者眼中的奢侈品:符号还是功能?. 心理科学, 43(6), 1398-1404. |
[6] | 吴莹皓, 蒋晶. (2018). 数字效应对消费者行为的影响及其心理机制. 心理科学进展, 26(9), 1680-1688. |
[7] | 赵娜, 秦学者, 刘雅倩, 孙铃. (2022). 一分价钱, 一分货?价格质量效应的理论机制与调节因素. 心理科学进展, 30(10), 2372-2380. |
[8] | 郑玉香. (2009). 我国大学生面子消费决策行为特点的探索性研究. 经济问题探索, (2), 55-60. |
[9] | Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. London: Harper Collins Publishers. |
[10] |
Ariely, D., Gneezy, U., & Haruvy, E. (2018). Social norms and the price of zero. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(2), 180-191.
doi: 10.1002/jcpy.1018 URL |
[11] |
Ashby, N. J., & Rakow, T. (2016). Eyes on the prize? Evidence of diminishing attention to experienced and foregone outcomes in repeated experiential choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(2-3), 183-193.
doi: 10.1002/bdm.1872 URL |
[12] |
Baumbach, E. (2016). The zero-price effect in a multicomponent product context. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(3), 689-694.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.01.009 URL |
[13] | Ben-Shahar, D., & Ash, D. (2021). Zero price and consumer welfare: Evidence from online classified home service. Social Science Research Network. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3942468 |
[14] |
Biswas, A., Bhowmick, S., Guha, A., & Grewal, D. (2013). Consumer evaluations of sale prices: Role of the subtraction principle. Journal of Marketing, 77(4), 49-66.
doi: 10.1509/jm.12.0052 URL |
[15] |
Bornemann, T., & Homburg, C. (2011). Psychological distance and the dual role of price. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(3), 490-504.
doi: 10.1086/659874 URL |
[16] |
Chandran, S., & Morwitz, V. G. (2006). The price of “free”- dom: Consumer sensitivity to promotions with negative contextual influences. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(3), 384-392.
doi: 10.1086/508439 URL |
[17] |
Chang, S.-S., Chang, C.-C., & Su, W.-G. (2015). Quality or sacrifice? The influence of decision task and product characteristics on the dual role of price. Psychological Reports, 117(1), 72-88.
doi: 10.2466/01.PR0.117c14z3 URL |
[18] |
Ching, A. T., Granlund, D., & Sundström, D. (2022). Quantifying the zero-price effect in the field: Evidence from Swedish prescription drug choices. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 7(2), 175-185.
doi: 10.1086/718460 URL |
[19] | Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 151-192). New York: McGraw-Hill. |
[20] |
Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015-1026.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015 URL |
[21] |
Dallas, S. K., & Morwitz, V. G. (2018). “There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch”: Consumers’ reactions to pseudo-free offers. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(6), 900-915.
doi: 10.1177/0022243718817010 URL |
[22] |
Dinsmore, J. B., Wright, S. A., & Plotkina, D. (2021). When time pressure counters the zero price effect. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 38(3), 399-350.
doi: 10.1108/JCM-03-2020-3722 URL |
[23] | Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319. |
[24] | Drake, C., Cai, S.-T., Anderson, D., & Sacks, D. W. (2021). Financial transaction costs reduce benefit take-up: Evidence from zero-premium health plans in Colorado. Social Science Research Network. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3743009 |
[25] | Driouchi, A., Chetioui, Y., & Baddou, M. (2011). How zero price affects demand?: Experimental evidence from the Moroccan telecommunication market. Münich Personal RePEc Archive. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/32352/ |
[26] |
Fan, X., Cai, F. C., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2022). The boomerang effect of zero pricing: When and why a zero price is less effective than a low price for enhancing consumer demand. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50(3), 521-537.
doi: 10.1007/s11747-022-00842-1 URL |
[27] |
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52(1), 45-56.
doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.45 URL |
[28] |
Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). Pay enough or don't pay at all. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 791-810.
doi: 10.1162/003355300554917 URL |
[29] | Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2) 161-178. |
[30] |
Graham, D. J., & Mohr, G. S. (2014). When zero is greater than one: Consumer misinterpretations of nutrition labels. Health Psychology, 33(12), 1579-1587.
doi: 10.1037/hea0000080 pmid: 24707845 |
[31] |
Grossman, G. M., & Shapiro, C. (1988). Foreign counterfeiting of status goods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(1), 79-100.
doi: 10.2307/1882643 URL |
[32] |
Gu, X., Kannan, P. K., & Ma, L. (2018). Selling the premium in freemium. Journal of Marketing, 82(6), 10-27.
doi: 10.1177/0022242918807170 URL |
[33] |
Heyman, J., & Ariely, D. (2004). Effort for payment: A tale of two markets. Psychological Science, 15(11), 787-793.
doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00757.x pmid: 15482452 |
[34] |
Hossain, M. T., & Saini, R. (2015). Free indulgences: Enhanced zero-price effect for hedonic options. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(4), 457-460.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.10.001 URL |
[35] |
Hsee, C. K., Yang, Y., Gu, Y., & Chen, J. (2009). Specification seeking: How product specifications influence consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 952-966.
doi: 10.1086/593947 URL |
[36] |
Hüttel, B. A., Schumann, J. H., Mende, M., Scott, M. L., & Wagner, C. J. (2018). How consumers assess free e-services: The role of benefit-inflation and cost-deflation effects. Journal of Service Research, 21(3), 267-283.
doi: 10.1177/1094670517746779 URL |
[37] | Hüttel, B. A., Wagner, C. J., Schumann, J. H. (2016). Adding new perspectives to the zero-price effect: The role of non-monetary cost perceptions. In L. Petruzzellis, & R. Winer (Eds.), Rediscovering the essentiality of marketing. Developments in marketing science: Proceedings of the academy of marketing science. (p. 113). Cham, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29877-1_25 |
[38] | Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. |
[39] |
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292.
doi: 10.2307/1914185 URL |
[40] |
Kamins, M. A., Folkes, V. S., & Fedorikhin, A. (2009). Promotional bundles and consumers’ price judgments: When the best things in life are not free. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 660-670.
doi: 10.1086/599806 URL |
[41] | Kanat, I., Raghu, T. S., & Vinze, A. (2016). What would make a free product an even better deal? Zero price effects on end user choice. Social Science Research Network. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2847698 |
[42] |
Koch, O. F., & Benlian, A. (2017). The effect of free sampling strategies on freemium conversion rates. Electronic Markets, 27(1), 67-76.
doi: 10.1007/s12525-016-0236-z URL |
[43] |
Krajbich, I., Lu, D., Camerer, C., & Rangel, A. (2012). The attentional drift-diffusion model extends to simple purchasing decisions. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 193.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00193 pmid: 22707945 |
[44] |
Li, J. J., & Su, C. (2007). How face influences consumption—A comparative study of American and Chinese consumers. International Journal of Market Research, 49(2), 237-256.
doi: 10.1177/147078530704900207 URL |
[45] |
Lichtenstein, D. R., & Burton, S. (1989). The relationship between perceived and objective price-quality. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(4), 429-443.
doi: 10.1177/002224378902600405 URL |
[46] | Lin, T.-C., Hsu, J. S. C., & Chen, H.-C. (2013). Customer willingness to pay for online music: The role of free mentality. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 14(4), 315-333. |
[47] |
Ma, H., Mo, Z., Zhang, H., Wang, C., & Fu, H. (2018). The temptation of zero price: Event-related potentials evidence of how price framing influences the purchase of bundles. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, 251.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00251 pmid: 29731705 |
[48] |
Mao, W. (2021). Choice set size and consumer preference for an option with a “zero” attribute value. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(3), 626-634.
doi: 10.1002/cb.1889 URL |
[49] |
Mao, W. (2016). Sometimes “fee” is better than “free”: Token promotional pricing and consumer reactions to price promotion offering product upgrades. Journal of Retailing, 92(2), 173-184.
doi: 10.1016/j.jretai.2015.09.001 URL |
[50] |
Murata, A. (2017). Discussion on human's irrational behavior to price of zero: Identification of condition of zero-price effect. International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics, 6(1), 34-46.
doi: 10.4018/IJABE.2017010103 URL |
[51] |
Nicolau, J. L., & Sellers, R. (2012). The free breakfast effect: An experimental approach to the zero price model in tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 51(3), 243-249.
doi: 10.1177/0047287511418370 URL |
[52] |
Niemand, T., Mai, R., & Kraus, S. (2019). The zero-price effect in freemium business models: The moderating effects of free mentality and price-quality inference. Psychology & Marketing, 36(8), 773-790.
doi: 10.1002/mar.21211 URL |
[53] | Niemand, T., Tischer, S., Fritzsche, T., & Kraus, S. (2015, December). The freemium effect: Why consumers perceive more value with free than with premium offers. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2015), Fort Worth, Texas, United States. |
[54] |
O’Brien, D. (2022). Free lunch for all?-A path analysis on free mentality, paying intent and media budget for digital journalism. Journal of Media Economics, 34(1), 29-61.
doi: 10.1080/08997764.2022.2060241 URL |
[55] |
Palmeira, M. M. (2011). The zero-comparison effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 16-26.
doi: 10.1086/657998 URL |
[56] |
Palmeira, M. M., & Srivastava, J. (2013). Free offer≠ cheap product: A selective accessibility account on the valuation of free offers. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4), 644-656.
doi: 10.1086/671565 URL |
[57] |
Pham, M. T. (1998). Representativeness, relevance, and the use of feelings in decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(2), 144-159.
doi: 10.1086/209532 URL |
[58] |
Pinhas, M., & Tzelgov, J. (2012). Expanding on the mental number line: Zero is perceived as the “smallest”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1187-1205.
doi: 10.1037/a0027390 URL |
[59] |
Raghubir, P. (2004). Free gift with purchase: Promoting or discounting the brand?. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1-2), 181-186.
doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_20 URL |
[60] |
Schindler, R. M., & Kirby, P. N. (1997). Patterns of rightmost digits used in advertised prices: Implications for nine-ending effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 192-201.
doi: 10.1086/209504 URL |
[61] |
Schneider, M., & Coulter, R. A. (2015). A dual process evaluability framework for decision anomalies. Journal of Economic Psychology, 51, 183-198.
doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2015.09.005 URL |
[62] |
Shampanier, K., Mazar, N., & Ariely, D. (2007). Zero as a special price: The true value of free products. Marketing Science, 26(6), 742-757.
doi: 10.1287/mksc.1060.0254 URL |
[63] |
Stiving, M., & Winer, R. S. (1997). An empirical analysis of price endings with scanner data. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(1), 57-67.
doi: 10.1086/209493 URL |
[64] |
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039-1061.
doi: 10.2307/2937956 URL |
[65] |
Votinov, M., Aso, T., Fukuyama, H., & Mima, T. (2016). A neural mechanism of preference shifting under zero price condition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 177.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00177 pmid: 27148024 |
[66] |
Zhang, S., & Markman, A. B. (1998). Overcoming the early entrant advantage: The role of alignable and nonalignable differences. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(4), 413-426.
doi: 10.1177/002224379803500401 URL |
[1] | 叶舒琪, 尹俊婷, 李招贤, 罗俊龙. 情绪对直觉与分析加工的影响机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(5): 736-746. |
[2] | 郭理, 加锁锁, 李圭泉, 李蔓林. 高处不胜寒?领导工作场所孤独感的多层次双刃剑效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(4): 582-596. |
[3] | 马原啸, 陈旭. 焦虑易感群体焦虑识别与消退中催产素的作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(1): 10-19. |
[4] | 肖婷炜, 董洁, 梁飞, 王福顺, 李洋. 厌恶情绪与自杀行为的关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(1): 87-98. |
[5] | 寇东晓, 王晓玉. 权力对人际敏感性的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(1): 108-115. |
[6] | 邹迪, 李红, 王福顺. 唤醒定义探析及其认知神经生理基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(9): 2020-2033. |
[7] | 刘薇, 沈晓玲. 团队行动中反思与团队创新关系研究的动态视角——认知与情绪的双元路径[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(8): 1759-1769. |
[8] | 梁飞, 江瑶, 肖婷炜, 董洁, 王福顺. 基本情绪的神经基础:来自fMRI与机器视觉技术研究的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(8): 1832-1843. |
[9] | 杨倩. 负性情绪在冲突适应中的作用机制:分离与整合视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(8): 1844-1855. |
[10] | 刘春晓, 刘立志, 王丹, 陈文锋. 集体仪式促进群体情绪感染的机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(8): 1870-1882. |
[11] | 王燕青, 龚少英, 姜甜甜, 吴亚男. 情感代理能否提高多媒体学习的效果?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(7): 1524-1535. |
[12] | 武晓菲, 肖风, 罗劲. 创造性认知重评在情绪调节中的迁移效应及其神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3): 477-485. |
[13] | 刘俊材, 冉光明, 张琪. 不同情绪载体的神经活动及其异同——脑成像研究的ALE元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3): 536-555. |
[14] | 姚海娟, 王琦, 李兆卿. 情绪调节中的认知重评创造力[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3): 601-612. |
[15] | 赵信娴, 杨小虎. 老年人群的韵律感知[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3): 613-621. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||