ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办：中国科学院心理研究所
出版：科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 99-110.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00099

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

人格研究中的“能动”与“共生”及其关系

潘 哲;郭永玉;徐步霄;杨沈龙   

  1. (华中师范大学心理学院, 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室, 人的发展与心理健康湖北省重点实验室, 武汉 430079)
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-12 出版日期:2017-01-15 发布日期:2017-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 郭永玉, E-mail: yyguo@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    (1)国家社会科学基金重点项目：危机管理中的心理社会支持研究(13AZD087); (2)华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费(人文社科类)重大培育项目之重大学术成果培育计划：社会治理中的心理学问题(CCNU14 Z02018)。

Agency, Communion and their relationship in personality research

PAN Zhe; GUO Yongyu; XU Buxiao; YANG Shenlong   

  1. (School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education, and Hubei Human Development and Mental Health Key Laboratory, Wuhan 430079, China)
  • Received:2016-04-12 Online:2017-01-15 Published:2017-01-15
  • Contact: GUO Yongyu, E-mail: yyguo@mail.ccnu.edu.cn

PDF (PC)

3099

摘要：

能动意为个体通过权力、控制等方式追求自身的独立; 共生意为个体通过关爱、交流等方式追求融入集体。能动与共生是一种人格分类系统, 能够对特质、动机及价值观等领域进行有效划分。对于能动与共生在不同的人格领域中是何种关系, 以往的理论和研究存有分歧：在特质领域中正交关系受到了较多支持, 在动机领域中存在着对立与不完全对立的分歧, 在价值观领域中存在着对立与正交的分歧。分歧的可能原因包括研究者对于概念界定的差异、不同人格领域的独特属性以及领域间的相互作用。未来的研究应关注文化对于这两者的含义及关系的影响, 考察这一分类系统在中国文化中的适用性。

关键词: 能动, 共生, 人格分类系统, 特质, 动机, 价值观

Abstract:

Agency is the pursuit of individuality through power and control; communion is the participation in a large organism through care and contact. Agency and communion are regarded as a personality taxonomy which can be properly used to classify phenomena within domains of traits, motivations, and values. However, theoretical reasoning and empirical findings show some disagreement about the relationship between agency and communion. Specifically, for traits, an orthogonality of agency and communion is supported; for motivations, a divergence exists between a mutually exclusive relation and a partially exclusive relation; for values, a divergence exists between an orthogonal relation and a mutually exclusive relation. Possible reasons for the disagreement are as follows: diverse definitions of agency and communion by different researchers; unique properties of each personality domain, as well as interactions between these domains. Further research should focus on the influence of culture background on the relationship and the meanings of agency and communion. The application of such taxonomy to the personality of Chinese should be explored as well.

Key words: agency, communion, personality taxonomy, trait, motivation, values