[1] 冯雪, 彭凯平. (2015). 技能和风格: 理性思维的两种测量途径.心理科学进展, 23(9), 1550-1559. [2] 李艳红, 刘佳诺. (2022). 人们为什么相信假新闻:对“假新闻信念”的认知心理学解释.新闻界, 8, 14-26. [3] 刘雅辉, 靳小龙, 沈华伟, 鲍鹏, 程学旗. (2018). 社交媒体中的谣言识别研究综述.计算机学报, 41(7), 1536-1558. [4] 彭知辉. (2022). 论中国语境下Disinformation概念的对接、转换与重新阐释.情报理论与实践, 45(1), 1-10. [5] 汪新建, 张慧娟, 武迪, 吕小康. (2017). 文化对个体风险感知的影响:文化认知理论的解释.心理科学进展, 25(8), 1251-1260. [6] 吴诗苑, 董庆兴, 宋志君, 张斌. (2022). 社交媒体中错误信息的检测方法研究述评.情报学报, 41(6), 651-661. [7] 朱月龙, 张开华, 段锦云. (2017). 建议采纳的情绪机制.心理科学进展, 25(9), 1607-1613. [8] Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2017). Fast logic?: Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory.Cognition, 158, 90-109. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.014 [9] Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2019). The intuitive greater good: Testing the corrective dual process model of moral cognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(10), 1782-1801. doi: 10.1037/xge0000533 [10] Bago B., Rand D. G., & Pennycook G. (2020). Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(8), 1608-1613. doi: 10.1037/xge0000729 [11] Bago B., Rosenzweig L. R., Berinsky A. J., & Rand D. G. (2022). Emotion may predict susceptibility to fake news but emotion regulation does not seem to help.Cognition and Emotion, 36(6), 1166-1180. doi: 10.1080/02699931. 2022.2090318 [12] Baron, J. (2017). Comment on Kahan and Corbin: Can polarization increase with actively open-minded thinking?Research & Politics, 4(1), 1-4. doi: 10.1177/2053168016688122 [13] Batailler C., Brannon S. M., Teas P. E., & Gawronski B. (2022). A signal detection approach to understanding the identification of fake news.Perspectives On Psychological Science, 17(1), 78-98. doi: 10.1177/1745691620986135 [14] Brashier, N. M., & Marsh, E. J. (2020). Judging truth.Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 499-515. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050807 [15] Bronstein M. V., Pennycook G., Bear A., Rand D. G., & Cannon T. D. (2019). Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking.Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 108-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.005 [16] Evans, J., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate.Perspectives On Psychological Science, 8(3), 223-241. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685 [17] Gawronski B., Ng N. L., & Luke D. M. (2023). Truth sensitivity and partisan bias in responses to misinformation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(8), 2205-2236. doi: 10.1037/xge0001381 [18] Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (Eds). (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. John Wiley. [19] Hornsey, M. J., & Fielding, K. S. (2017). Attitude roots and Jiu Jitsu persuasion: Understanding and overcoming the motivated rejection of science.American Psychologist, 72(5), 459-473. doi: 10.1037/a0040437 [20] Ismagilova E., Slade E., Rana N. P., & Dwivedi Y. K. (2020). The effect of characteristics of source credibility on consumer behaviour: A meta-analysis.Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101736. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.005 [21] Kahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection.Judgment and Decision Making, 8(4), 407-424. doi: 10.1017/S1930297500005271 [22] Kahan, D. M. (2017). ‘Ordinary science intelligence': A science-comprehension measure for study of risk and science communication, with notes on evolution and climate change.Journal of Risk Research, 20(8), 995-1016. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2016.1148067 [23] Kahan D. M., Braman D., Monahan J., Callahan L., & Peters E. (2010). Cultural cognition and public policy: The case of outpatient commitment laws. Law and Human Behavior, 34(2), 118-140. doi: 10.1007/s10979- 008-9174-4 [24] Kahan, D. M., & Corbin, J. C. (2016). A note on the perverse effects of actively open-minded thinking on climate-change polarization.Research & Politics, 3(4), 1-5. doi: 10.1177/2053168016676705 [25] Kahan D. M., Peters E., Dawson E. C., & Slovic P. (2017). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government.Behavioural Public Policy, 1(1), 54-86. doi: 10.1017/bpp. 2016.2 [26] Kahan D. M., Peters E., Wittlin M., Slovic P., Ouellette L. L., Braman D., & Mandel G. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks.Nature Climate Change, 2(10), 732-735. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1547 [27] Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning.Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480-498. doi: 10.1037/0033- 2909.108.3.480 [28] Lerner J. S., Li Y., Valdesolo P., & Kassam K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making.Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 799-823. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych- 010213-115043 [29] Lewandowsky S., Ecker U. K. H., & Cook J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “Post-Truth” era.Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353-369. doi: 10.1016/ j.jarmac.2017.07.008 [30] Lewandowsky S., Ecker U. K., Seifert C. M., Schwarz N., & Cook J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106-131. doi: 10.1177/1529100612451018 [31] Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2016). Motivated rejection of science.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(4), 217-222. doi: 10.1177/0963721416654436 [32] Li Y., Fan Z., Yuan X., & Zhang X. (2022). Recognizing fake information through a developed feature scheme: A user study of health misinformation on social media in China. Information Processing & Management, 59(1), Article 102769. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102769 [33] Lynn, S. K., & Barrett, L. F. (2014). “Utilizing” signal detection theory.Psychological Science, 25(9), 1663-1673. doi: 10.1177/0956797614541991 [34] Martel C., Pennycook G., & Rand D. G. (2020). Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5, Article 47. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3 [35] Mirhoseini M., Early S., El Shamy N., & Hassanein K. (2023). Actively open-minded thinking is key to combating fake news: A multimethod study. Information & Management, 60(3), 103761. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2023. 103761 [36] Pehlivanoglu D., Lighthall N. R., Lin T., Chi K. J., Polk R., Perez E., … Ebner N. C. (2022). Aging in an “infodemic”: The role of analytical reasoning, affect, and news consumption frequency on news veracity detection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 28(3), 468-485. doi: 10.1037/xap0000426 [37] Pennycook G., Bear A., & Collins E. (2020). The implied truth effect: Attaching warnings to a subset of fake news headlines increases perceived accuracy of headlines without warnings.Management Science, 66(11), 4944-4957. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2019.3478 [38] Pennycook G., Cannon T. D., & Rand D. G. (2018). Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(12), 1865-1880. doi: 10.1037/xge0000465 [39] Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.Cognition, 188, 39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011 [40] Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking.Journal of Personality, 88(2), 185-200. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12476 [41] Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388-402. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007 [42] Pham, M. (2006). Emotion and rationality: A critical review and interpretation of empirical evidence.Review of General Psychology, 11(2), 155-178. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.155 [43] Pilditch T. D., Madsen J. K., & Custers R. (2020). False prophets and Cassandra's curse: The role of credibility in belief updating.Acta Psychologica, 202, 102956. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102956 [44] Qiu X. Y., Oliveira D., Shirazi A. S., Flammini A., & Menczer F. (2017). Limited individual attention and online virality of low-quality information.Nature Human Behaviour, 1(8), 1-7. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0507-0 [45] Rathje S., Roozenbeek J., Van Bavel J. J., & van der Linden, S. (2023). Accuracy and social motivations shape judgements of (mis)information.Nature Human Behaviour, 7(6), 892-903. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01540-w [46] Saltor J., Barberia I., & Rodríguez-Ferreiro J. (2023). Thinking disposition, thinking style, and susceptibility to causal illusion predict fake news discriminability.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 37(2), 360-368. doi: 10.1002/acp.4008 [47] Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2003). Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychological Inquiry, 14(3-4), 296-303. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1403&4_20 [48] Slovic P., Finucane M. L., Peters E., & MacGregor D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic.European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1333-1352. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006 [49] Stanovich, K. E. (2016). The comprehensive assessment of rational thinking.Educational Psychologist, 51(1), 23-34. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2015.1125787 [50] Swire B., Ecker U. K., & Lewandowsky S. (2017). The role of familiarity in correcting inaccurate information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(12), 1948-1961. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000422 [51] Thompson, V. A., & Johnson, S. C. (2014). Conflict, metacognition, and analytic thinking.Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 215-244. doi: 10.1080/13546783. 2013.869763 [52] Thomson, K. S., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2016). Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test.Judgment and Decision Making, 11(1), 99-113. doi: 10.1017/ S1930297500007622 [53] Trivedi N., Krakow M., Hyatt Hawkins K., Peterson E. B., & Chou W. S. (2020). “Well, the message is from the institute of something”: Exploring source trust of cancer- related messages on simulated facebook posts.Frontiers in Communication, 5, 12. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2020.00012 [54] Trivedi N., Lowry M., Gaysynsky A., & Chou W. S. (2022). Factors associated with cancer message believability: A mixed methods study on simulated facebook posts.Journal of Cancer Education, 37(6), 1870-1878. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02054-7 [55] Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.Psychological Review, 90(4), 293-315. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293 [56] Van Bavel, J. J., & Pereira, A. (2018). The partisan brain: An identity-based model of political belief.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(3), 213-224. doi: 10.1016/j.tics. 2018.01.004 [57] Vosoughi S., Roy D., & Aral S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online.Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559 [58] Wang Y., McKee M., Torbica A., & Stuckler D. (2019). Systematic literature review on the spread of health- related misinformation on social media.Social Science & Medicine, 240, 112552. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552 [59] Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe. [60] Weeks, B. E. (2015). Emotions, partisanship, and misperceptions: How anger and anxiety moderate the effect of partisan bias on susceptibility to political misinformation.Journal of Communication, 65(4), 699-719. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12164 [61] Zheng X., Wu S., & Nie D. (2021). Online health misinformation and corrective messages in China: A comparison of message features.Communication Studies, 72, 1-16. doi: 10.1080/10510974.2021.1917437 |