互联网企业玩兴氛围对创新行为的跨层次作用机制

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00523

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

互联网企业通过营造快乐愉悦的玩兴氛围, 推动员工持续创新, 以期组织目标的实现。然而, 现有玩兴氛围与员工创新行为关系的研究以理论分析为主, 缺乏实证研究, 进展相对缓慢。在回顾组织管理领域玩兴研究成果的基础上, 开展三个方面的研究：研究一基于组织氛围理论和玩兴活动特征, 开发中国情境下互联网企业的团队玩兴氛围量表。研究二立足于团队层次, 依据资源保存理论重点探讨了玩兴氛围对员工创新行为的跨层次作用机制。研究三从创造力成分模型出发, 引入个体思维方式和多重认同, 探讨激发员工创新行为的边界条件。研究结果发展了中国互联网企业团队玩兴氛围的概念, 促进了玩兴氛围理论的发展, 为互联网类企业营造玩兴氛围以激发创新行为提供理论支持和实践启示。

关键词: 玩兴氛围, 创新行为, 工作重塑, 资源保存理论, 创造力成分模型

Abstract:

To achieve organizational goals, Internet companies often stimulate continuous innovation of employees by cultivating a happy and joyful work environment. However, the link between playful climate and employees’ innovative behaviors is still underdeveloped, primarily focusing on theoretical analyses and lacking empirical support. Building on the prior findings of playfulness in the field of organizational management, the present study explores three important issues. Based on the theory of organizational climate and the characteristics of playfulness, study 1 develops a scale to measure team playful climate in Chinese Internet firms. Standing on the team level study 2 discusses the cross-level mechanisms underlying the relationship between playful work environment and employees’ innovation from the perspective of Conservation of Resources Theory. Based on the Componential Theory of Individual Creativity, study 3 introduces individual thinking styles and multiple identities to explore the boundary conditions that stimulate employees’ innovative behaviors. Our findings have developed the concept of team playful climate in Chinese Internet companies, enhanced playful climate theory. And the implications for practice in the context of Internet companies are discussed.

Key words: playful climate, innovative behaviors, job crafting, conservation of resources theory, componential theory of individual creativity

中图分类号:

B849:C93

杨洁, 张露, 黄勇. (2020). 互联网企业玩兴氛围对创新行为的跨层次作用机制. 心理科学进展 , 28(4), 523-534.

YANG Jie, ZHANG Lu, HUANG Yong. (2020). Cross-level mechanism of playful climate on innovative behaviors in internet companies. Advances in Psychological Science, 28(4), 523-534.

图/表 1

参考文献 83

1	彼得·费希万, 诺琳·费希万, 爱格尼丝·蒂瓦里, 费利克斯·尤恩 . ( 2009). 作为普遍人类现象的批判性思维——中国和美国的视角. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 46( 1), 55-62.
2	德鲁克, P. F. . (2006). 巨变时代的管理(朱雁斌译). 北京: 机械工业出版.
3	段锦云, 凌斌 . ( 2011). 中国背景下员工建言行为结构及中庸思维对其的影响. 心理学报, 43( 10), 1185-1197.
4	韩翼, 杨百寅 . ( 2011). 真实型领导、心理资本与员工创新行为: 领导成员交换的调节作用. 管理世界, (12), 78-86+188.
5	侯玉波 . ( 2017). 批判性思维对中国人创新观念与行为的影响. 心理科学进展, 25( 5), 723-730.
6	胡贝贝, 王胜光, 段玉厂 . ( 2019). 互联网引发的新技术-经济范式解析. 科学学研究, 37( 4), 582-589.
7	江静, 杨百寅 . ( 2016). 换位思考、任务反思与团队创造力: 领导批判性思维的调节作用. 南开管理评论, 19( 6), 27-35.
8	李辉 . ( 2018). 工作资源对员工创新行为的影响研究: 基于资源保存理论的视角. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 17( 6), 73-84.
9	李阳, 白新文 . ( 2015). 善心点亮创造力: 内部动机和亲社会动机对创造力的影响. 心理科学进展, 23( 2), 175-181.
10	梁萌 . ( 2016). 技术变迁视角下的劳动过程研究——以互联网虚拟团队为例. 社会学研究, 31(2), 82-101+243.
11	梁萌 . ( 2019). 弹性工时制何以失效? 互联网企业工作压力机制的理论与实践研究. 社会学评论, 7( 3), 35-49.
12	梁萌, 陈建伟 . ( 2017). 补偿还是自主: 互联网技术嵌入与工作压力作用机制变迁研究. 中国人力资源开发, (8), 36-47+70.
13	刘文彬, 唐杰, 邵云飞 . ( 2017). 基于广义文献的组织管理中的“工作乐趣”研究. 中国软科学, ( 9), 175-183.
14	刘云硕, 叶龙, 郭名 . ( 2019). 中国情境下工作重塑对员工创造力的影响研究. 软科学, 33( 5), 87-91.
15	马丽, 鲍红娟, 杨春江, 毛承成, 刘伟姣 . ( 2016). 新生代员工工作场所乐趣对离职的影响: 组织嵌入的中介作用. 中国人力资源开发, ( 23), 6-14.
16	聂晶, 卢新怡 . ( 2016). 玩兴与创造: 基于个体和组织视角分析. 中国科技论坛, ( 3), 19-23.
17	唐汉瑛, 龙立荣 . ( 2019). 员工建言促进工作绩效: 谦卑领导的调节作用. 管理科学, 32( 1), 95-104.
18	王石磊, 彭正龙 . ( 2013). 新员工反馈寻求行为对其创新行为的影响研究. 管理评论, 25( 12), 156-164.
19	杨洁, 常铭超, 张露 . ( 2019). 工作场所乐趣对员工创新行为的作用机制研究. 管理科学, 32( 3), 28-41.
20	杨中芳 . ( 2009). 传统文化与社会科学结合之实例: 中庸的社会心理学研究. 中国人民大学学报, 2009, 23( 3), 53-60.
21	叶余建, 张炜 . ( 2019). 互联网工程师工作绩效影响因素研究: 基于工作场所乐趣和代际差异的解释. 高等工程教育研究, ( 4), 119-124.
22	余嫔 . ( 2005). 工作趣味化:玩兴管理的概念与方向. 应用心理研究, ( 26), 73-94.
23	余嫔, 吴静吉, 林伟文 . ( 2003). 成人玩兴量表与组织玩兴气氛量表之发展. 测量学刊, 50( 1), 73-110.
24	袁庆宏, 丁刚, 李珲 . ( 2014). 知识型员工职业成长与离职意愿: 组织认同和专业认同的调节作用. 科学学与科学技术管理, 35( 1), 155-164.
25	曾琦 . ( 2008). 领导风格、组织玩兴气氛及组织创新之研究(硕士学位论文). 高雄应用科技大学, 台湾.
26	张军伟, 龙立荣 . ( 2016). 服务型领导对员工人际公民行为的影响: 宽恕氛围与中庸思维的作用. 管理工程学报, 30( 1), 43-51.
27	张宁俊, 朱伏平, 张斌 . ( 2013). 高校教师职业认同与组织认同关系及影响因素研究. 教育发展研究, 33( 21), 53-59.
28	张正堂 . ( 2009). 如何让研发人员“乐在其中”: 营造促进创新的玩兴氛围. 中国人力资源开发, ( 7), 27-30.
29	赵继新, 王梦茜, 赵大丽 . ( 2018). 基于Price-Mueller模型的互联网公司员工离职影响因素研究. 河北经贸大学学报, 39( 5), 93-101.
30	赵宇楠, 程震霞, 井润田 . ( 2019). 平台组织交互设计及演化机制探究. 管理科学, 32( 3), 3-15.
31	Abramis, D. J . ( 1990). Play in work: Childish hedonism or adult enthusiasm? American Behavioral Scientist, 33( 3), 353-373.
32	Amabile, T. M . ( 1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40( 1), 39-58.
33	Amabile T. M., Conti R., Coon H., Lazenby J., & Herron M . ( 1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. The Academy of Management Journal, 39( 5), 1154-1184.
34	Anderson N., Potočnik K., & Zhou J . ( 2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40( 5), 1297-1333.
35	Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F . ( 1989). Scocial identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14( 1), 20-39.
36	Burris E. R., Rockmann K. W., & Kimmons Y. S . ( 2017). The value of voice to managers: Employee identification and the content of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 60( 6), 2099-2125.
37	Chan, S. C. H., & Mak, W.-M . ( 2016). Have you experienced fun in the workplace. Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management, 7( 1), 27-38.
38	Clark S. M., Gioia D. A., Ketchen D. J., & Thomas J. B . ( 2010). Transitional identity as a facilitator of organizational identity change during a merger. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55( 3), 397-438.
39	Csikszentmihalyi, M . ( 1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: The experience of play in work and games. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40	Ekvall, G . ( 1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 5( 1), 105-123.
41	Fluegge-Woolf, E. R . ( 2014). Play hard, work hard: Fun at work and job performance. Management Research Review, 37( 8), 682-705.
42	Ford R. C., McLaughlin F. S., & Newstrom J. W . ( 2003). Questions and answers about fun at work. Human Resource Planning, 26( 4), 18-33.
43	Glynn, M. A., & Webster, J . ( 1992). The adult playfulness scale: An initial assessment. Psychological Reports, 71( 1), 83-103.
44	Gordon H. J., Demerouti E., Le Blanc P. M., & Bipp T . ( 2015). Job crafting and performance of Dutch and American health care professionals. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14( 4), 192-202.
45	Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W . ( 2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54( 1), 73-96.
46	Halbesleben J. R. B., Neveu J.-P., Paustian-Underdahl S. C., & Westman M . ( 2014). Getting to the “COR”: Understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. Journal of Management, 40( 5), 1334-1364.
47	Han H., Kim W., & Jeong C . ( 2016). Workplace fun for better team performance: Focus on frontline hotel employees. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28( 7), 1391-1416.
48	Hekman D. R., Bigley G. A., Steensma H. K., & Hereford J. F . ( 2009). Combined effects of organizational and professional identification on the reciprocity dynamic for professional employees. Academy of Management Journal, 52( 3), 506-526.
49	Hobfoll, S. E . ( 2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An international Review, 50( 3), 337-421.
50	Hunter C., Jemielniak D., & Postula A . ( 2010). Temporal and spatial shifts within playful work. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23( 1), 87-102.
51	Isaksen S. G., Lauer K. J., & Ekvall G . ( 1999). Situational outlook questionnaire: A measure of the climate for creativity and change. Psychological Reports, 85( 2), 665-674.
52	Jiang, J., & Yang, B . ( 2015). Roles of creative process engagement and leader-member exchange in critical thinking and employee creativity. Social Behavior and Personality, 43( 7), 1217-1232.
53	Johnson M. D., Morgeson F. P., Ilgen, D. R, Meyer, C. J., & Lloyd J. W . ( 2006). Multiple professional identities: Examining differences in identification across work-related targets. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91( 2), 498-506.
54	Kamalan, K., & Sutha, J . ( 2017). Influence of fun/entertainment at workplace on employee performance in Sri Lankan IT sector. Scholars Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 4( 11), 739-748.
55	Karamfilov, K . ( 2018). Leaders’ endorsement of idiosyncratic workplace fun, organizational playfulness climate, and organizational creativity (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
56	Karl K., Peluchette J., Hall L., & Harland L . ( 2005). Attitudes toward workplace fun: A three sector comparison. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12( 2), 1-17.
57	Leana C., Appelbaum E., & Shevchuk I . ( 2009). Work Process and quality of care in early childhood education: The role of job crafting. Academy of Management Journal, 52( 6), 1169-1192.
58	Lundin S. C., Paul H., & Christensen J . ( 2000). Fish! A remarkable way to boost morale and improve results (pp. 23-35). New York, NY: Hyperion.
59	Mainemelis, C., & Ronson, S . ( 2006). Ideas are born in fields of play: Towards a theory of play and creativity in organizational settings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 81-131.
60	McDowell, T ( 2004). Fun at work: Scale development, confirmatory factor analysis, and links to organizational outcomes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Alliant International University, San Diego, CA.
61	Michel, J. W., Tews, M. J., & Allen D. G . ( 2019). Fun in the workplace: A review and expanded theoretical perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 29( 1), 98-110.
62	Müceldili, B., & Erdil, O . ( 2016). Finding fun in work: The effect of workplace fun on taking charge and job engagement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science, 235, 304-312.
63	Mumford M. D., Todd E. M., Higgs C., & McIntosh T . ( 2017). Cognitive skills and leadership performance: The nine critical skills. The Leadership Quarterly, 28( 1), 24-39.
64	Petelczyc C. A., Capezio A., Wang L., Restubog S. L. D., & Aquino K . ( 2018). Play at work: An integrative review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 44( 1), 161-190.
65	Plester B., Cooper-Thomas H., & Winquist J . ( 2015). The fun paradox. Employee Relations, 37( 3), 380-398.
66	Plester, B., & Hutchison, A . ( 2016). Fun times: The relationship between fun and workplace engagement. Employee Relations, 38( 3), 332-350.
67	Schmidt, E., & Rosenberg, J . ( 2014). How Google works (pp. 26-74, 203-210). London: John Murray.
68	Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A . ( 1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37( 3), 580-607.
69	Shin, J., & Grant, A. M . ( 2019). Bored by interest: How intrinsic motivation in one task can reduce performance on other tasks. Academy of Management Journal, 62( 2), 415-436.
70	Song D., Liu H.-F., Gu J., & He C.-Q . ( 2018). Collectivism and employees’ innovative behavior: The mediating role of team identification and the moderating role of leader-member exchange. Creativity and Innovation Management, 27( 2), 221-231.
71	Tang J., Liu M.-S., & Liu W.-B . ( 2017). How workplace fun influences employees’ performance: The role of person-organization value congruence. Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal, 45( 11), 1787-1802.
72	Tavares S. M., van Knippenberg D., & van Dick R . ( 2016). Organizational identification and “currencies of exchange”: Integrating social identity and social exchange perspectives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46( 1), 34-45.
73	Tews M. J., Michel J. W., & Allen D. G . ( 2014). Fun and friends: The impact of workplace fun and constituent attachment on turnover in a hospitality context. Human Relations, 67( 8), 923-946.
74	Tews M. J., Michel J. W., & Bartlett A . ( 2012). The fundamental role of workplace fun in applicant attraction. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19( 1), 105-114.
75	Tims M., Bakker A. B., & Derks D . ( 2012). Development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80( 1):173-186.
76	Tims M., Bakker A. B., & Derks D . ( 2013a). The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18( 2), 230-40.
77	Tims M., Bakker A. B., Derks D., & van Rhenen W . ( 2013b). Job crafting at the team and individual level: Implications for work engagement and performance. Group & Organization Management, 38( 4), 427-454.
78	Tiwari A., Lai P., So M., & Yueh K ., ( 2006). A comparison of the effects of problem-based learning and lecturing on the development of students’ critical thinking. Medical Education, 40( 6), 547-554.
79	van Vleet, M., & Feeney, B. C . ( 2015). Young at heart: A perspective for advancing research on play in adulthood. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10( 5), 639-645.
80	West, M. A . ( 1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In M. A. West and J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 309-333). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
81	Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E . ( 2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26( 2), 179-201.
82	Zhou, J. & Hoever, I. J . ( 2014). Research on Workplace Creativity: A Review and Redirection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 333-359.
83	Zhu Y.-Q., Gardner D. G., & Chen H.-G . ( 2018). Relationships between work team climate, individual motivation, and creativity. Journal of Management, 44( 5), 2094-2115.

[1]	王颂, 张了丹, 栾琨. 员工网络建构行为的概念内涵及作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(5): 840-853.
[2]	林新月, 孟亮. 嵌入于社会情境的工作重塑[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(4): 888-905.
[3]	王琼. 职业可续视角下的工作重塑行为研究：动力、路径及干预机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3): 499-510.
[4]	马冰, 杨蓉, 杜旌, 马贵梅. 居危思变?工作不安全感对创新行为的差异化影响?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(11): 2381-2394.
[5]	田喜洲, 郭小东, 许浩. 工作重塑研究的新动向——基于调节定向的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(8): 1367-1378.
[6]	王桢. 团队工作重塑的形成与影响机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(3): 390-404.
[7]	向姝婷, 赵锴, 宁南. “赋能”还是“负担”?领导者授权行为对员工工作行为影响的双刃剑效应探究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(11): 1814-1835.
[8]	王忠军, 张丽瑶, 杨茵茵, 王仁华, 彭义升. 职业生涯晚期工作重塑与工作中成功老龄化[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(9): 1643-1655.
[9]	刘艳, 邹希, 舒心. 组织认同对员工创新行为的促进和抑制过程[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1153-1166.
[10]	李姗姗, 王海宁, 栾贞增, 王强. 交互视角下工作重塑干预的影响效应整合模型[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(4): 726-736.
[11]	徐长江, 陈实. 工作重塑干预：对员工工作自主性的培养[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(8): 1501-1510.
[12]	田喜洲, 刘美玲. 基于个体优势的工作重塑[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(9): 1579-1596.
[13]	张春雨;韦嘉;陈谢平;张进辅. 工作设计的新视角：员工的工作重塑[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(8): 1305-1313.