具身效应何处寻：解决可重复性危机的分析性途径

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.02260

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

最近的研究发现某些具身效应不能被重复, 这给心理学界带来了空前的可重复性危机。基于对具身认知“概念化”、“替代”和“构成”主题的分析, 通过区分具身效应的生成层次、强弱条件、建构方向和任务特性四个方面, 以便在实验中更准确地“定位”具身效应。未来研究可以从具身效应层次的分离与综合, 强弱条件的界分, 调节或中介机制探讨以及实验范式革新等方面加以推进。

关键词: 具身认知, 可重复性, 具身层次, 具身强弱, 具身方向, 在线-离线任务

Abstract:

Recently, previously established embodiment effects (e.g. power pose effects) have partly failed to replicate, calling into question whether embodiment is in fact a true effect. Based on an analysis of the concepts of “conceptualization”, “alternative” and “construction” of embodiment cognition, this present article proposed a way out of the dilemma by specifying four characteristics of this effect: embodied generating level, strength degree, constructing direction and experimental task. Clarifying these four aspects could be helpful to accurately understand the embodiment effect and address the replication crisis. Future studies could conduct by differentiating and synthesizing the embodied generating levels, distinguishing different conditions for embodied strength, discovering the mediating or moderating role of embodied variables, and creating new specific experimental paradigms.

Key words: embodied cognition, replication, generating level, strength degree, constructing direction, online- offline task

中图分类号:

B841

刘传军, 廖江群. (2018). 具身效应何处寻：解决可重复性危机的分析性途径. 心理科学进展 , 26(12), 2260-2271.

LIU Chuanjun, LIAO Jiangqun. (2018). An analytical approach to understanding and solving the replication crisis of the embodiment effect. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(12), 2260-2271.

图/表 1

参考文献 103

1	陈巍 . ( 2014). 可重复性: 盘旋在具身认知实验室上方的“幽灵”. 心理技术与应用, ( 1), 23-25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5588.2014.01.006 URL
2	陈巍, 郭本禹 . ( 2014). 具身-生成的认知科学: 走出“战国时代”. 心理学探新, 34( 2), 111-116. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5184.2014.02.003 URL
3	陈潇, 江琦, 侯敏, 朱梦音 . ( 2014). 具身道德: 道德心理学研究的新取向. 心理发展与教育, 30( 6), 664-672.
4	方溦, 葛列众, 甘甜 . ( 2016). 道德具身认知的理论研究. 心理与行为研究, 14( 6), 765-772.
5	韩冬, 叶浩生 . ( 2014). 重中之“重”——具身视角下重的体验与表征. 心理科学进展, 22( 6), 918-925. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00918 URL
6	何华容, 丁道群 . ( 2014). 良心的重量: 基于具身视角的内疚情绪与重量感关系的实验研究. 第十七届全国心理学学术会议, 中国北京.
7	黄茜羽, 李宏翰 . ( 2013). 冷暖体验对道德判断的影响. 心理学与创新能力提升——第十六届全国心理学学术会议, 中国南京.
8	胡传鹏, 王非, 过继成思, 宋梦迪, 隋洁, 彭凯平 . ( 2016). 心理学研究中的可重复性问题: 从危机到契机. 心理科学进展, 24( 9), 1504-1518. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01504 URL
9	黎晓丹, 杜建政, 叶浩生 . ( 2016). 中国礼文化的具身隐喻效应: 蜷缩的身体使人更卑微. 心理学报, 48( 6), 746-756. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00746 URL
10	刘亚, 王振宏, 孔风 . ( 2011). 情绪具身观: 情绪研究的新视角. 心理科学进展, 19( 1), 50-59. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2011.00050 URL
11	刘钊, 丁凤琴 . ( 2016). 大学生道德概念的重量与洁净隐喻. 中国健康心理学杂志, 24( 4), 533-536. doi: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2016.04.014 URL
12	栾子烟 . ( 2013). 道德温度:身体冷暖与青少年道德决策(硕士学位论文). 上海:华东师范大学.
13	牛怡然, 鲁忠义 . ( 2013). 道德概念的亮度隐喻表征及其对亮度知觉判断的影响 . 心理学与创新能力提升——第十六届全国心理学学术会议, 中国南京.
14	彭凯平, 喻丰 . ( 2012). 道德的心理物理学现象、机制与意义. 中国社会科学, ( 12), 28-45.
15	苏彦捷, 孙芳芳 . ( 2014). 道德具身性的元分析研究. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 32( 2), 88-96.
16	伍秋萍, 冯聪, 陈斌斌 . ( 2011). 具身框架下的社会认知研究述评. 心理科学进展, 19( 3), 336-345. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2011.00336 URL
17	薛灿灿, 叶浩生 . ( 2011). 具身社会认知: 认知心理学的生态学转向. 心理科学, 34( 5), 1230-1235.
18	阎书昌 . ( 2011). 身体洁净与道德. 心理科学进展, 19( 8), 1242-1248.
19	杨继平, 郭秀梅 . ( 2016). 具身视角下道德概念的隐喻研究. 心理学探新, 36( 5), 387-391.
20	杨继平, 郭秀梅, 王兴超 . ( 2017). 道德概念的隐喻表征——从红白颜色、左右位置和正斜字体的维度. 心理学报, 49( 7), 875-885. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00875 URL
21	叶浩生 . ( 2010). 具身认知: 认知心理学的新取向. 心理科学进展, 18( 5), 705-710.
22	叶浩生 . ( 2013). 认知与身体: 理论心理学的视角. 心理学报, 45( 4), 481-488. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.00481 URL
23	殷融, 曲方炳, 叶浩生 . ( 2012). 具身概念表征的研究及理论述评. 心理科学进展, 20( 9), 1372-1381. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2012.01372 URL
24	殷融, 苏得权, 叶浩生 . ( 2013). 具身认知视角下的概念隐喻理论. 心理科学进展, 21( 2), 220-234. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00220 URL
25	翟贤亮, 葛鲁嘉 . ( 2017). 从离身到具身: 具身管理学的可能. 心理科学, 40( 1), 238-243.
26	Ackerman J. M., Nocera C. C., & Bargh J. A . ( 2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, 328( 5986), 1712-1715. doi: 10.1126/science.1189993 URL pmid: 20576894
27	Andy, C(2008 ). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(02)00217-1 URL
28	Bai Y., Maruskin L. A., Chen S., Gordon A. M., Stellar J. E., McNeil G. D., .. Keltner D . ( 2017). Awe, the diminished self, and collective engagement: Universals and cultural variations in the small self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113( 2), 185-209. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000087 URL pmid: 28481617
29	Banerjee P., Chatterjee P., & Sinha J . ( 2012). Is it light or dark? Recalling moral behavior changes perception of brightness. Psychological Science, 23( 4), 407-409. doi: 10.1177/0956797611432497 URL pmid: 22395128
30	Bargh J. A., Chen M., & Burrows L . ( 1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71( 2), 230-244. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.230 URL pmid: 8765481
31	Carney D. R., Cuddy A. J., & Yap A. J . ( 2010). Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21( 10), 1363-1368.
32	Chapman H. A., Kim D. A., Susskind J. M., & Anderson A. K . ( 2009). In bad taste: Evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science, 323( 5918), 1222-1226. doi: 10.1126/science.1165565 URL pmid: 19251631
33	Chartrand T. L., Huber J., Shiv B., & Tanner R. J . ( 2008). Nonconscious goals and consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35( 2), 189-201. doi: 10.1086/588685 URL
34	Day, M.V., &Bobocel, D.R . ( 2013). The weight of a guilty conscience: Subjective body weight as an embodiment of guilt. PLoS One, 8( 7), e69546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069546 URL pmid: 3729967
35	Dijksterhuis, Ap, &Nordgren, Loran F . ( 2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 1( 2), 95-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00007.x URL pmid: 26151465
36	Doyen S., Klein O., Pichon C. L., & Cleeremans A . ( 2012). Behavioral priming: It's all in the mind, but whose mind? Plos One, 7( 1), e29081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029081 URL pmid: 22279526
37	Eisenberger N. I., Lieberman M. D., & Williams K. D . ( 2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302( 5643), 290-292. doi: 10.1126/science.1089134 URL pmid: 14551436
38	Eskine K. J., Kacinik N. A., & Prinz J. J . ( 2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science, 22( 3), 295-299. doi: 10.1177/0956797611398497 URL pmid: 21307274
39	Eskine K. J., Kacinik N. A., & Webster G. D . ( 2012). The bitter truth about morality: Virtue, not vice, makes a bland beverage taste nice. PLoS One, 7( 7), e41159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041159 URL pmid: 3399822
40	Ferrin, A. ( 2017). Good moral judgment and decision-making without deliberation. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 55( 1), 68-95. doi: 10.1111/sjp.12210 URL
41	Fischer J., Fischer P., Englich B., Aydin N., & Frey D . ( 2011). Empower my decisions: The effects of power gestures on confirmatory information processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47( 6), 1146-1154. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.008 URL
42	Garrison K. E., Tang D., & Schmeichel B. J . ( 2016). Embodying power: A preregistered replication and extension of the power pose effect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7( 7), 623-630.
43	Gilead M., Gal O., Polak M., & Cholow Y . ( 2015). The role of nature and nurture in conceptual metaphors the case of gustatory priming. Social Psychology, 46( 3), 167-173. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000238 URL
44	Giner-Sorolla, R., &Chapman, H.A . ( 2017). Beyond Purity. Psychological Science, 28( 1), 80-91.
45	Goldinger S. D., Papesh M. H., Barnhart A. S., Hansen W. A., & Hout M. C . ( 2016). The poverty of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23( 4), 959-978. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0860-1 URL pmid: 27282990
46	Greene, J.D. ( 2007). Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 11( 8), 322-323. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.004 URL pmid: 17625951
47	Greene J. D., Morelli S. A., Lowenberg K., Nystrom L. E., & Cohen J. D . ( 2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107( 3), 1144-1154. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004 URL pmid: 2429958
48	Gronau Q. F., Van Erp S., Heck D. W., Cesario J., Jonas K. J., & Wagenmakers E.-J . ( 2017). A Bayesian model-averaged meta-analysis of the power pose effect with informed and default priors: The case of felt power. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2( 1), 123-138. doi: 10.1080/23743603.2017.1326760 URL
49	Helzer, E.G., &Pizarro, D.A . ( 2011). Dirty liberals! reminders of physical cleanliness influence moral and political attitudes. Psychological Science, 22( 4), 517-522. doi: 10.1177/0956797611402514 URL pmid: 21421934
50	Homan P., Ely B. A., Yuan M., Brosch T., Ng J., Trope Y., & Schiller D . ( 2017). Aversive smell associations shape social judgment. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 144, 86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.07.004 URL
51	Horberg E. J., Oveis C., Keltner D., & Cohen A. B . ( 2009). Disgust and the moralization of purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97( 6), 963-976. doi: 10.1037/a0017423 URL pmid: 19968413
52	IJzerman, H., &Koole, S.L . ( 2011). From perceptual rags to metaphoric riches-bodily, social, and cultural constraints on sociocognitive metaphors: Comment on Landau, Meier, and Keefer (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 137( 2), 355-361. doi: 10.1037/a0022373 URL pmid: 21355634
53	Inbar Y., Pizarro D. A., & Bloom P . ( 2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition & Emotion, 23( 4), 714-725. doi: 10.1080/02699930802110007 URL
54	Inbar Y., Pizarro D. A., Knobe J., & Bloom P . ( 2009). Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays. Emotion, 9( 3), 435-439. doi: 10.1037/a0015960 URL pmid: 19485621
55	Johnson D. J., Cheung F., & Donnellan M. B . ( 2014). Does cleanliness influence moral judgments? A direct replication of Schnall, Benton, and Harvey (2008). Social Psychology, 45( 3), 209-215. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000186 URL
56	Kang, E., &Lakshmanan, A . ( 2017). Role of executive attention in consumer learning with background music. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27( 1), 35-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2016.03.003 URL
57	Kang Y., Williams L. E., Clark M. S., Gray J. R., & Bargh J. A . ( 2011). Physical temperature effects on trust behavior: The role of insula. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6( 4), 507-515. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq077 URL pmid: 3150863
58	Landau M. J., Meier B. P., & Keefer L. A . ( 2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136( 6), 1045-1067. doi: 10.1037/a0020970 URL pmid: 20822208
59	Landy, J.F., &Goodwin, G.P . ( 2015). Does incidental disgust amplify moral judgment? a meta-analytic review of experimental evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science A Journal of The Association for Psychological Science, 10( 4), 518-536. doi: 10.1177/1745691615583128 URL pmid: 26177951
60	Lee, S. W.S., &Schwarz, N . ( 2011). Wiping the slate clean: Psychological consequences of physical cleansing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20( 5), 307-311.
61	Lee, S. W.S., &Schwarz, N . ( 2012). Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103( 5), 737-749. doi: 10.1037/a0029708 URL pmid: 22905770
62	Liljenquist K., Zhong C. B., & Galinsky A. D . ( 2010). The smell of virtue: Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity. Psychological Science, 21( 3), 381-383. doi: 10.1177/0956797610361426 URL pmid: 2042407420
63	Meier B. P., Moeller S. K., Riemer-Peltz M., & Robinson M. D . ( 2012). Sweet taste preferences and experiences predict prosocial inferences, personalities, and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102( 1), 163-174. doi: 10.1037/a0025253 URL pmid: 21875232
64	Meier B. P., Simone S., Norbert S., & Bargh J. A . ( 2012). Embodiment in social psychology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4( 4), 705-716.
65	Montoro P. R., Contreras M. J., Elosúa M. R., & Marmolejoramos F . ( 2015). Cross-modal metaphorical mapping of spoken emotion words onto vertical space. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1205. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01205 URL pmid: 4531208
66	Moore, C., &Barresi, J . ( 2017). The role of second-person information in the development of social understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1667. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01667 URL pmid: 5622194
67	Mukherjee S., Kramer T., & Kulow K . ( 2017). The effect of spicy gustatory sensations on variety-seeking. Psychology & Marketing, 34( 8), 786-794. doi: 10.1002/mar.21022 URL
68	Natanzon, M., &Ferguson, M.J . ( 2012). Goal pursuit is grounded: The link between forward movement and achievement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48( 1), 379-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.021 URL
69	Niedenthal, P.M. ( 2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316( 5827), 1002-1005.
70	Nosek B. A., Hawkins C. B., & Frazier R. S . ( 2011). Implicit social cognition: From measures to mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15( 4), 152-159. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.005 URL pmid: 3073696
71	Oosterwijk S., Rotteveel M., Fischer A. H., & Hess U . ( 2009). Embodied emotion concepts: How generating words about pride and disappointment influences posture. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39( 3), 457-466. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.584 URL
72	Preston, J.L., &Ritter, R.S . ( 2012). Cleanliness and godliness: Mutual association between two kinds of personal purity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48( 6), 1365-1368. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.015 URL
73	Price, T.F., &Harmon-Jones, E . ( 2015). Embodied emotion: The influence of manipulated facial and bodily states on emotive responses. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science, 6( 6), 461-473. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1370 URL pmid: 26401657
74	Ranehill E., Dreber A., Johannesson M., Leiberg S., Sul S., & Weber R. A . ( 2015). Assessing the robustness of power posing: No effect on hormones and risk tolerance in a large sample of men and women. Psychological Science, 26( 5), 653-656. doi: 10.1177/0956797614553946 URL pmid: 25810452
75	Ritter, R.S., &Preston, J.L . ( 2011). Gross gods and icky atheism: Disgust responses to rejected religious beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47( 6), 1225-1230. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.006 URL
76	Rotella, K.N., &Richeson, J.A . ( 2013). Body of guilt: Using embodied cognition to mitigate backlash to reminders of personal & ingroup wrongdoing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49( 4), 643-650.
77	Rozin P., Haidt J., & Fincher K . ( 2009). Psychology. From oral to moral. Science, 323( 5918), 1179-1180. doi: 10.1126/science.1170492 URL pmid: 19251619
78	Rozin P., Lowery L., Imada S., & Haidt J . ( 1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76( 4), 574-586. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.574 URL pmid: 10234846
79	Schaefer M., Denke C., Heinze H. J., & Rotte M . ( 2014). Rough primes and rough conversations: Evidence for a modality-specific basis to mental metaphors. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9( 11), 1653-1659. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst163 URL pmid: 4221208
80	Schaefer M., Rotte M., Heinze H. J., & Denke C . ( 2015). Dirty deeds and dirty bodies: Embodiment of the Macbeth effect is mapped topographically onto the somatosensory cortex. Scientific Reports, 5, 18051. doi: 10.1038/srep18051 URL pmid: 26686599
81	Schilbach L., Timmermans B., Reddy V., Costall A., Bente G., Schlicht T., & Vogeley K . ( 2013). Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36( 4), 393-462.
82	Schnall, S. ( 2017). Disgust as embodied loss aversion. European Review of Social Psychology, 28( 1), 50-94. doi: 10.1080/10463283.2016.1259844 URL
83	Schnall S., Benton J., & Harvey S . ( 2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19( 12), 1219-1222. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02227.x URL pmid: 19121126
84	Schnall S., Haidt J., Clore G. L., & Jordan A. H . ( 2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34( 8), 1096-1109.
85	Seidel, A., &Prinz, J . ( 2013). Sound morality: Irritating and icky noises amplify judgments in divergent moral domains. Cognition, 127( 1), 1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.004 URL pmid: 23318349
86	ShapiroL. ( 2011). Embodied Cognition. London and New York: Rutledge.
87	Sheikh S., Botindari L., & White E . ( 2013). Embodied metaphors and emotions in the moralization of restrained eating practices. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49( 3), 509-513. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.016 URL
88	Sherman, G.D., &Clore, G.L . ( 2009). The color of sin: White and black are perceptual symbols of moral purity and pollution. Psychological Science, 20( 8), 1019-1025. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02403.x URL pmid: 2832478
89	Skarlicki D. P., Hoegg J., Aquino K., & Nadisic T . ( 2013). Does injustice affect your sense of taste and smell? The mediating role of moral disgust. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49( 5), 852-859. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.011 URL
90	Song H. J., Vonasch A. J., Meier B. P., & Bargh J. A . ( 2012). Brighten up: Smiles facilitate perceptual judgment of facial lightness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48( 1), 450-452. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.003 URL
91	Valdesolo P., Ouyang J., & DeSteno D . ( 2010). The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46( 4), 693-695. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.004 URL
92	Wei W. Q., Lu J. G., Galinsky A. D., Wu H., Gosling S. D., Rentfrow P. J., .. Wang L . ( 2017). Regional ambient temperature is associated with human personality. Nature Human Behaviour, 1( 12), 890-895. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0240-0 URL
93	Williams, L.E., &Bargh, J.A . ( 2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322( 5901), 606-607. doi: 10.1126/science.1162548 URL pmid: 2737341
94	Wilson, M. ( 2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9( 4), 625-636. doi: 10.3758/BF03196322 URL pmid: 12613670
95	Wiswede D., MÜnte T. F., Krämer U. M., & RÜsseler J . ( 2009). Embodied emotion modulates neural signature of performance monitoring. Plos One, 4( 6), e5754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005754 URL pmid: 2685014
96	Xu A. J., Zwick R., & Schwarz N . ( 2012). Washing away your (good or bad) luck: Physical cleansing affects risk-taking behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141( 1), 26-30. doi: 10.1037/a0023997 URL pmid: 21707206
97	Yan Z. X., Ding D. Q., & Yan L. S . ( 2011). To wash your body, or purify your soul: Physical cleansing would strengthen the sense of high moral character. Psychology, 2( 9), 992-997.
98	Yang Q., Wu X. C., Zhou X. Y., Mead N. L., Vohs K. D., & Baumeister R. F . ( 2013). Diverging effects of clean versus dirty money on attitudes, values, and interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104( 3), 473-489. doi: 10.1037/a0030596 URL pmid: 23127377
99	Zapatafonseca L., Froese T., Schilbach L., Vogeley K., & Timmermans B . ( 2018). Sensitivity to social contingency in adults with high-functioning autism during computer- mediated embodied interaction. Behavioral Science, 8, 22. doi: 10.3390/bs8020022 URL pmid: 29419758
100	Zestcott C. A., Stone J., & Landau M. J . ( 2017). The role of conscious attention in how weight serves as an embodiment of importance. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 43( 12), 1712-1723. doi: 10.1177/0146167217727505 URL
101	Zhang, M., &Li, X.P . ( 2012). From physical weight to psychological significance: The contribution of semantic activations. Journal of Consumer Research, 38( 6), 1063-1075. doi: 10.1086/661768 URL
102	Zhong, C.B., &Liljenquist, K . ( 2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313( 5792), 1451-1452.
103	Ziv N., Hoftman M., & Geyer M . ( 2012). Music and moral judgment: The effect of background music on the evaluation of ads promoting unethical behavior. Psychology of Music, 40( 6), 738-760. doi: 10.1177/0305735611406579 URL

[1]	黄顺森, 陈豪杰, 来枭雄, 代欣然, 王耘. 多元宇宙样分析：简介及应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(2): 196-208.
[2]	杨雪, 朱旭. 情感触摸对心理健康的影响及应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(12): 2789-2798.
[3]	金雨薇, 孙潇, 宋耀武. 具身记忆及其内在机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(11): 2497-2506.
[4]	白亚停, 何文广. 二语具身认知：自动激活还是母语中介?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(11): 1970-1978.
[5]	于文华, 鲁忠义. 手势认知功能研究的新视角：“空间化”手势假设[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(3): 426-433.
[6]	熊素红, 孙洪杰, 陆佶, 姚琦, 张全成. 具身认知视角的饮食消费行为——基于心理模拟“具身”方式[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(3): 486-496.
[7]	李莹, 张灿, 王悦. 道德情绪在道德隐喻映射中的作用及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1224-1231.
[8]	殷继兴, 胡传鹏. 神经科学偏见效应：可重复性及其心理机制的探索[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(12): 1988-1995.
[9]	陈琳, 田晓明, 段锦云. 建议采纳的认知机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(1): 149-159.
[10]	魏华, 段海岑, 周宗奎. 具身认知视角下的消费者行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(7): 1294-1306.
[11]	李恒. “前”、“后”轴上的内隐时空映射及其影响因素 ^*[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(6): 975-983.
[12]	路红, 张心园, 韦文琦, 刘毅. 空间物理秩序对心理和行为的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(3): 560-570.
[13]	胡传鹏;王非;过继成思;宋梦迪; 隋洁;彭凯平. 心理学研究中的可重复性问题：从危机到契机[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(9): 1504-1518.
[14]	孙炳丽;田雨;孙海洋;王文忠. 从心理咨询与治疗的角度看自我[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(1): 83-90.
[15]	叶红燕;张凤华. 从具身视角看道德判断[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(8): 1480-1488.