[1] 胡传鹏. (2019). 将预注册的重复实验纳入心理学研究方法的课程. 心理技术与应用, 7(5), 261-262, 265. [2] 胡传鹏, 王非, 过继成思, 宋梦迪, 隋洁, 彭凯平.(2016). 心理学研究中的可重复性问题: 从危机到契机. 心理科学进展, 24(9), 1504-1518. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01504 [3] Allen, C., & Mehler, D. M. A. (2019). Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond. PLOS Biology, 17(5), e3000246. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000246 [4] Baxter M. G.,& Burwell, R. D. (2017). Promoting transparency and reproducibility in Behavioral Neuroscience: Publishing replications, registered reports, and null results. Behavioral Neuroscience, 131(4), 275-276. https://doi.org/10.1037/bne0000207 [5] Button K. S., Ioannidis J. P. A., Mokrysz C., Nosek B. A., Flint J., Robinson E. S. J., & Munafò M. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 365-376. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3475 [6] Chambers C. D.(2013). Registered reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016 [7] Chambers, C. D. (2017). Talks. Retrieved June 16, 2023, from https://osf.io/9exdz [8] Chambers, C. D. (2019). What's next for Registered Reports? Nature, 573(7773), 187-189. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02674-6 [9] Chambers C. D., Feredoes E., Muthukumaraswamy S. D.,& Etchells, P.(2014). Instead of "playing the game" it is time to change the rules: Registered Reports at AIMS Neuroscience and beyond. AIMS Neuroscience, 12014.1.4 [10] Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2022). The past, present and future of Registered Reports. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(1), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01193-7 [11] Christensen G., Wang Z., Levy Paluck E., Swanson N., Birke D., Miguel E., & Littman R. (2019). Open science practices are on the rise: The state of social science (3S) survey. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5rksu [12] Conry-Murray C., Mcconnon A., & Bower M. (2022). The effect of preregistration and p-value patterns on trust in psychology and biology research. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), 36306. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.36306 [13] de Angelis C., Drazen J. M., Frizelle F. A., Haug C., Hoey J., Horton R., .. van der Weyden, M. B. (2004). Clinical trial registration: A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. The New England Journal of Medicine, 351(12), 1250-1251. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe048225 [14] Eich, E. (2014). Business not as usual. Psychological Science, 25(1), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613512465 [15] Fanelli, D. (2010). “Positive” results increase down the hierarchy of the sciences. PLOS One, 5(4), e10068. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010068 [16] Feldman, G. (2022). Peer Community in Registered Report (PCI RR) as the future of science: Our experience from 15 in-process scheduled PCI RR replication and extension submissions. Retrieved August 27, 2023, from https://osf.io/pn64d [17] Franco A., Malhotra N., & Simonovits G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502-1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484 [18] Gliklich R. E., Dreyer N. A., & Leavy M. B. (Eds). (2014). Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: A user’s guide (Vol. 2). AHRQ Publication No. 13 (14)-EHC111. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. [19] Hardwicke, T. E., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2018). Mapping the universe of registered reports. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(11), 793-796. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0444-y [20] Hardwicke, T. E., & Vazire, S. (2023). Transparency is now the default at psychological science. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231221573 [21] Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 [22] Jin H., Wang Q., Yang Y.-F., Zhang H., Gao M., Jin S., .. Chuan-Peng H. (2023). The Chinese Open Science Network (COSN): Building an open science community from scratch. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(1), 25152459221144986. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221144986 [23] John L. K., Loewenstein G., & Prelec D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524-532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953 [24] Jones B. C., DeBruine L. M., Flake J. K., Liuzza M. T., Antfolk J., Arinze N. C., .. Coles N. A. (2021). To which world regions does the valence-dominance model of social perception apply? Nature Human Behaviour, 5(1), 159-169. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01007-2 [25] Jones C. W., Keil L. G., Holland W. C., Caughey M. C., & Platts-Mills T. F. (2015). Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: A systematic review. BMC Medicine, 13(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0520-3 [26] Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196-217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4 [27] Kiyonaga A.,& Scimeca, J. M.(2019). Practical considerations for navigating registered reports. Trends in Neurosciences, 422019.07.003 [28] Klein R. A., Ratliff K. A., Vianello M., Adams Jr R. B., Bahník Š., Bernstein M. J., .. Nosek B. A. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45(3), 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178 [29] Klein R. A., Vianello M., Hasselman F., Adams B. G., Adams Jr R. B., Alper S., Aveyard M., .. Nosek B. A. (2018). Many labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443-490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225 [30] Lindsay D. S., Simons D. J., & Lilienfeld S. O. (2016). Research preregistration 101. APS Observer, 29, 14-16. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/research-preregistration-101 [31] Macnamara, B. N., & Burgoyne, A. P. (2023). Do growth mindset interventions impact students' academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. Psychological Bulletin. 149(3-4), 133- 173. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000352 [32] Makel M. C., Plucker J. A., & Hegarty B. (2012). Replications in psychology research: How often do they really occur? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 537-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460688 [33] McIntosh, R. D.(2017). Exploratory reports: A new article type for Cortex. Cortex, 962017.07.014 [34] Mellor D. T., Esposito J., Hardwicke T. E., Nosek B. A., Cohoon J., Soderberg C. K., .. Speidel R. (2019). Preregistration challenge: Plan, test, discover. Retrieved June 18, 2023, from https://osf.io/jea94 [35] Munafò M. R., Nosek B. A., Bishop D. V. M., Button K. S., Chambers C. D., Percie du Sert N., .. Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), 0021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021 [36] Nature Editorial. (2023). Nature welcomes Registered Reports. Nature, 614(7949), 594. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00506-2 [37] Nosek B. A., Alter G., Banks G. C., Borsboom D., Bowman S. D., Breckler S. J., .. Yarkoni T. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348(6242), 1422-1425. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374 [38] Nosek B. A., Beck E. D., Campbell L., Flake J. K., Hardwicke T. E., Mellor D. T., van 't Veer, A. E., & Vazire, S.(2019). Preregistration is hard, and worthwhile. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 232019.07.009 [39] Nosek B. A., Ebersole C. R., DeHaven A. C., & Mellor D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600-2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114 [40] Nosek B. A., Hardwicke T. E., Moshontz H., Allard A., Corker K. S., Dreber A., .. Vazire S. (2022). Replicability, robustness, and reproducibility in Psychological Science. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 719-748. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157 [41] Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results. Social Psychology, 45(3), 137-141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192 [42] Nosek, B. A., & Lindsay, D. S. (2018). Preregistration becoming the norm in psychological science. APS Observer, 31(3). https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/preregistration-becoming-the-norm-in-psychological-science [43] Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716 [44] Pfeiffer, N., & Call, M. (2022). Surpassing 100, 000 Registrations on OSF: Strides in adoption of open and reproducible research. Retrieved July 10, 2023, from https://www.cos.io/blog/surpassing-100000-registrations-on-osf [45] Pham, M. T., & Oh, T. T. (2021). Preregistration is neither sufficient nor necessary for good science. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1209 [46] Platt, J. R. (1964). Strong inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. Science, 146(3642), 347-353. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.146.3642.347 [47] Poldrack R. A.(2019). The costs of reproducibility. Neuron, 101(1), 11-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.11.030 [48] Scheel A. M., Schijen M. R. M. J., & Lakens D. (2021). An excess of positive results: Comparing the standard psychology literature with registered reports. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(2). 25152459 211007467. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211007467 [49] Schmidt, S. (2009). Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13(2), 90-100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015108 [50] Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (1992). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? In Methodological issues & strategies in clinical research. (pp. 389-406). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10109-032 [51] Simmons J. P., Nelson L. D., & Simonsohn U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359-1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632 [52] Simmons J. P., Nelson L. D., & Simonsohn U. (2021). Pre- registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208 [53] Soderberg C. K., Errington T. M., Schiavone S. R., Bottesini J., Thorn F. S., Vazire S., Esterling K. M., & Nosek B. A. (2021). Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(8), 990-997. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01142-4 [54] Spitzer, L., & Mueller, S. (2021). Registered report protocol: Survey on attitudes and experiences regarding preregistration in psychological research. PLOS One, 16(7), e0253950. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253950 [55] Syed, M. (2023). Some data indicating that editors and reviewers do not check preregistrations during the review process. PsyArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/nh7qw [56] Szollosi A., Kellen D., Navarro D. J., Shiffrin R., van Rooij, I., van Zandt, T., & Donkin, C.(2020). Is preregistration worthwhile? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 242019.11.009 [57] van den Akker, O. R., van Assen M., Bakker M., Elsherif M., Wong T. K., & Wicherts J. M. (2023). Preregistration in practice: A comparison of preregistered and non- preregistered studies in psychology. Behavior Research Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02277-0 [58] Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Dutilh, G. (2016). Seven selfish reasons for preregistration. APS Observer, 29(9). https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/seven-selfish-reasons-for-preregistration [59] Wagenmakers E. J., Wetzels R., Borsboom D., & van der Maas, H. L. (2011). Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 426-432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022790 [60] Wicherts J. M., Bakker M., & Molenaar D. (2011). Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results. PLOS One, 6(11), e26828. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026828 [61] Wicherts J. M., Borsboom D., Kats J., & Molenaar D. (2006). The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. American Psychologist, 61(7), 726- 728. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.61.7.726 |