ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办：中国科学院心理研究所
出版：科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2): 303-315.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.00303

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

选择与坚持：跨期选择与延迟满足之比较

任天虹1;胡志善2;孙红月3;刘扬1;李纾1   

  1. (1中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室, 北京 100101) (2浙江师范大学杭州幼儿师范学院, 杭州 310012) (3上海师范大学教育学院, 上海 200235)
  • 收稿日期:2014-02-14 出版日期:2015-02-14 发布日期:2015-02-14
  • 通讯作者: 李纾, E-mail: lishu@psych.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(2011CB711002)、国家自然科学基金(31170976; 31300843)、中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(SCX2-EW-J-8)、北京市优秀博士学位论文指导教师人文社科项目(20138012501)以及北京市重点学科建设项目资助。感谢审稿人、特别是二位编委所提的建设性意见。

Making A Decision vs. Sticking to A Decision: A Comparison of Intertemporal Choice and Delay of Gratification

REN Tian-Hong1; HU Zhi-Shan2; SUN Hong-Yue3; LIU Yang1; LI Shu1   

  1. (1 Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China) (2 Hangzhou Preschool Teachers College, Zhejiang Normal University, Hangzhou 310012, China) (3 College of Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200235, China)
  • Received:2014-02-14 Online:2015-02-14 Published:2015-02-14
  • Contact: LI Shu, E-mail: lishu@psych.ac.cn

PDF (PC)

3603

摘要：

做出选择与坚持选择是决策活动的两个重要阶段。跨期选择源于经济学领域对成人对发生在不同时间点的结果“做出选择”过程的研究; 延迟满足则源于心理学领域对儿童为获得未来较大收益而抵制当前诱惑的“坚持选择”过程的研究。二者均致力于研究与时间相关的决策活动, 从不同视角关注个体的冲动性与自我控制, 但鲜见学者对二者异同的系统比较。本文着重从研究方法、认知机制与神经基础入手探讨了二者的异同, 冀为两个研究领域协同发展、共同促进人类远见的培养与实践提供科学的理论支持。

关键词: 跨期选择, 延迟满足, 选择, 坚持

Abstract:

Making and sticking to a decision are two important stages in decision behavior. Intertemporal choice stems from economic research on the process of adults choosing among outcomes at different points in time, whereas delay of gratification comes from psychological research on childhood persistence, in which children had to resist the temptation of the sooner but smaller reward to obtain the later but larger reward. Both studies relate to time and focus on individual impulsiveness and self-control, although from different perspectives. Nonetheless, the two areas are rarely compared systematically. The article addresses this issue and compares their methods as well as their cognitive and neural mechanisms. The article provides scientific theoretical foundations for the collaborative development of both areas to facilitate the practice of foresight.

Key words: intertemporal choice, delay of gratification, choose, persist